Is my research statement supposed to lead to papers in top journals?Applying for jobs without significant publications: is it worth the pain and what to highlight?Background section for research statementHow can I improve my chance of getting a tenure-track positionMy research area has very few research positions, would it still be possible for me to stay in academia?Job prospects in case of an unwelcoming mentorCan I get a tenure track Applied Math assistant professor position in a top US college if my PhD was in a similar ranked private U.S. college?What to do if your phd went well?

How to persuade players not to cheat?

What is the equivalent of "if you say so" in German?

Is putting money in a 401(k) plan risky?

Does the original Game Boy game "Tetris" have a battery memory inside the cartridge?

Instant coffee melts like chocolate

I was mistakenly identified as a criminal, and this has caused rumors. How can I convince my friends that it is all a mistake?

Does the on'yomi of 輪 (リン) have any relation to the English "ring", or is it a coincidence?

Does cashing a 3% share harm the company itself?

Group Policy application on Domain Controllers

How exactly do you avoid fooling yourself?

Creating cryptographic algorithms at runtime

English equivalent of the Malayalam saying "don't stab/poke the dead body"?

Can the Wish spell be used to allow someone to be able to cast all of their spells at will?

Why is Google's quantum supremacy experiment impressive?

There are polygons with only right angles which have an odd number of corners

Is this bible in Koine Greek?

How did composers "test" their music?

"The" for the first time only

Is this change to how XP works in D&D 3.5 unbalanced?

How does Deep Packet Inspection work with encrypted packets?

Is homebrew Martial Spear as balanced as the Chultan spear (yklwa)?

If I am just replacing the car engine, do I need to replace the odometer as well?

What is self hosted version control system?

How to control the padding below a BarLegend?



Is my research statement supposed to lead to papers in top journals?


Applying for jobs without significant publications: is it worth the pain and what to highlight?Background section for research statementHow can I improve my chance of getting a tenure-track positionMy research area has very few research positions, would it still be possible for me to stay in academia?Job prospects in case of an unwelcoming mentorCan I get a tenure track Applied Math assistant professor position in a top US college if my PhD was in a similar ranked private U.S. college?What to do if your phd went well?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









11

















I'm about to start a 2-year postdoc in math with a possibility to stay a 3rd year. This means I will probably be on the job market in one year. I am planning to apply for tenure-track research positions. As I understand it, to get a tenure-track offer I should try to get at least one paper in a top journal. When I look at my research statement, I don't think I have projects that will lead to papers in, say, the Annals or JAMS or Duke. I listed a few projects that I think can get done quickly but are basically extensions of other people's papers, the idea being that these are "low-hanging fruit." I also listed some long-term ideas but they are speculative and aren't concrete problems. If I follow the research statement I probably won't have a paper in a top journal. Am I doing something wrong?



Edit: I should also add that my letter writers all looked at my research statement (they requested it) and didn't say that anything was off.










share|improve this question




























  • Pure mathematics, yes?

    – Buffy
    Jun 14 at 9:40











  • @Buffy: Yes.....

    – Mehta
    Jun 14 at 19:56

















11

















I'm about to start a 2-year postdoc in math with a possibility to stay a 3rd year. This means I will probably be on the job market in one year. I am planning to apply for tenure-track research positions. As I understand it, to get a tenure-track offer I should try to get at least one paper in a top journal. When I look at my research statement, I don't think I have projects that will lead to papers in, say, the Annals or JAMS or Duke. I listed a few projects that I think can get done quickly but are basically extensions of other people's papers, the idea being that these are "low-hanging fruit." I also listed some long-term ideas but they are speculative and aren't concrete problems. If I follow the research statement I probably won't have a paper in a top journal. Am I doing something wrong?



Edit: I should also add that my letter writers all looked at my research statement (they requested it) and didn't say that anything was off.










share|improve this question




























  • Pure mathematics, yes?

    – Buffy
    Jun 14 at 9:40











  • @Buffy: Yes.....

    – Mehta
    Jun 14 at 19:56













11












11








11


2






I'm about to start a 2-year postdoc in math with a possibility to stay a 3rd year. This means I will probably be on the job market in one year. I am planning to apply for tenure-track research positions. As I understand it, to get a tenure-track offer I should try to get at least one paper in a top journal. When I look at my research statement, I don't think I have projects that will lead to papers in, say, the Annals or JAMS or Duke. I listed a few projects that I think can get done quickly but are basically extensions of other people's papers, the idea being that these are "low-hanging fruit." I also listed some long-term ideas but they are speculative and aren't concrete problems. If I follow the research statement I probably won't have a paper in a top journal. Am I doing something wrong?



Edit: I should also add that my letter writers all looked at my research statement (they requested it) and didn't say that anything was off.










share|improve this question

















I'm about to start a 2-year postdoc in math with a possibility to stay a 3rd year. This means I will probably be on the job market in one year. I am planning to apply for tenure-track research positions. As I understand it, to get a tenure-track offer I should try to get at least one paper in a top journal. When I look at my research statement, I don't think I have projects that will lead to papers in, say, the Annals or JAMS or Duke. I listed a few projects that I think can get done quickly but are basically extensions of other people's papers, the idea being that these are "low-hanging fruit." I also listed some long-term ideas but they are speculative and aren't concrete problems. If I follow the research statement I probably won't have a paper in a top journal. Am I doing something wrong?



Edit: I should also add that my letter writers all looked at my research statement (they requested it) and didn't say that anything was off.







postdocs job-search






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 14 at 8:49







Mehta

















asked Jun 14 at 7:43









MehtaMehta

2007 bronze badges




2007 bronze badges















  • Pure mathematics, yes?

    – Buffy
    Jun 14 at 9:40











  • @Buffy: Yes.....

    – Mehta
    Jun 14 at 19:56

















  • Pure mathematics, yes?

    – Buffy
    Jun 14 at 9:40











  • @Buffy: Yes.....

    – Mehta
    Jun 14 at 19:56
















Pure mathematics, yes?

– Buffy
Jun 14 at 9:40





Pure mathematics, yes?

– Buffy
Jun 14 at 9:40













@Buffy: Yes.....

– Mehta
Jun 14 at 19:56





@Buffy: Yes.....

– Mehta
Jun 14 at 19:56










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11


















You do the best you can do with the ideas you have. Most very good mathematicians can’t come up with a JAMS worthy result every year, and it’s harder when you’re just out of graduate school. You do need to spend some time on some more ambitious ideas as a postdoc, but “more ambitious” doesn’t mean JAMS-worthy and there’s luck in which ideas pay off and when there’s an unexpected connection that turns up when you’re in the middle of a project.



Yes if you want a job at a top place you might need top publications, but all you can do is do your best with the ideas you have the expertise you developed. Most of us only get a couple publications at that level in our life. Aim to be productive and to increase the level of your publications, but thinking about how to get into JAMS or the Annals isn’t helpful.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Thanks. I feel as though I'm just starting out and now I feel pressured to have a paper in a very good journal in only one year.

    – Mehta
    Jun 14 at 15:39






  • 4





    That’s a very understandable reaction to the current job market. You’re right that this pressure is there, and you’re right that it’s not a reasonable expectation for most mathematicians. But there’s not much you can do about either of those things and overthinking it isn’t going to help you get there.

    – Noah Snyder
    Jun 14 at 15:46











  • I imagine even the best mathematicians struggle to get published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS), or the Journal of the American Musicological Society (JAMS), or the Journal of African Media Studies (JAMS), or even the Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences (JAMS).

    – Cody Gray
    Jun 14 at 21:37






  • 1





    @Mehta Given that the reviewing process is taking so long, even if you write down something ground breaking soon, it is unlikely that the results would be officially accepted in any top journal in one year's time.

    – Arctic Char
    Jun 29 at 16:13


















9


















This is orthogonal to the actual question, I realize. The answer of Noah Snyder is direct and seems correct to me. But I'd like to make a couple of recommendations about what to do during the postdoc so that when you enter the actual job market you are in the best possible position whether or not your research has resulted in completed high level papers.



First, your current backlog seems appropriate with both short and long term projects. You want to maintain and extend that.



The first recommendation is that you keep a research notebook in which you record ideas, as they occur to you, that might be exploited later when you have time. Researchers in large companies like IBM keep a "patent book" in which they record "possibly patentable" ideas when they occur. You can do the same with any sort of research. Periodically review the entries in your notebook to see whether you have additional extensions of them or can now develop them more fully. This notebook can form the basis of your next "research statement" when you are in the job market. Having a good backlog of projects of various difficulty and in various states of development can be an asset. Research in most fields, including, or maybe especially, mathematics can't really be time boxed. The results come when the insights come. But one big insight is knowing what might be possible to develop - and not forgetting it in the heat of other pursuits. Keep a notebook. Update it constantly.



And if you get blocked for some reason on your currently most important project, go to the notebook to see what you can do now while the main project gestates for a while. Have several irons in the fire, some hotter than others.



The other recommendation is to use your time as a postdoc to develop collaborative opportunities. Talk to a lot of people about your and their ideas. Think about whether it is advantageous to work with them. And make sure you capture anything significant (even slightly significant) in your research notebook. But one important benefit of such collaborative relationships is that you might eventually take a job at a small institution that doesn't have a lot of local opportunities. If you have a lot of prior relationships then you can still carry on a rich research program even if you are somewhat isolated. Even a relatively large department can be weak in your particular research area.



The notebook is useful for another reason, actually. It is useful for a new faculty member to have some ideas available for student research. If you have several partly developed ideas, perhaps they can be taken over by students. You already have given them some thought so it is easier to advise and guide them.






share|improve this answer





























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131880%2fis-my-research-statement-supposed-to-lead-to-papers-in-top-journals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11


















    You do the best you can do with the ideas you have. Most very good mathematicians can’t come up with a JAMS worthy result every year, and it’s harder when you’re just out of graduate school. You do need to spend some time on some more ambitious ideas as a postdoc, but “more ambitious” doesn’t mean JAMS-worthy and there’s luck in which ideas pay off and when there’s an unexpected connection that turns up when you’re in the middle of a project.



    Yes if you want a job at a top place you might need top publications, but all you can do is do your best with the ideas you have the expertise you developed. Most of us only get a couple publications at that level in our life. Aim to be productive and to increase the level of your publications, but thinking about how to get into JAMS or the Annals isn’t helpful.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      Thanks. I feel as though I'm just starting out and now I feel pressured to have a paper in a very good journal in only one year.

      – Mehta
      Jun 14 at 15:39






    • 4





      That’s a very understandable reaction to the current job market. You’re right that this pressure is there, and you’re right that it’s not a reasonable expectation for most mathematicians. But there’s not much you can do about either of those things and overthinking it isn’t going to help you get there.

      – Noah Snyder
      Jun 14 at 15:46











    • I imagine even the best mathematicians struggle to get published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS), or the Journal of the American Musicological Society (JAMS), or the Journal of African Media Studies (JAMS), or even the Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences (JAMS).

      – Cody Gray
      Jun 14 at 21:37






    • 1





      @Mehta Given that the reviewing process is taking so long, even if you write down something ground breaking soon, it is unlikely that the results would be officially accepted in any top journal in one year's time.

      – Arctic Char
      Jun 29 at 16:13















    11


















    You do the best you can do with the ideas you have. Most very good mathematicians can’t come up with a JAMS worthy result every year, and it’s harder when you’re just out of graduate school. You do need to spend some time on some more ambitious ideas as a postdoc, but “more ambitious” doesn’t mean JAMS-worthy and there’s luck in which ideas pay off and when there’s an unexpected connection that turns up when you’re in the middle of a project.



    Yes if you want a job at a top place you might need top publications, but all you can do is do your best with the ideas you have the expertise you developed. Most of us only get a couple publications at that level in our life. Aim to be productive and to increase the level of your publications, but thinking about how to get into JAMS or the Annals isn’t helpful.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      Thanks. I feel as though I'm just starting out and now I feel pressured to have a paper in a very good journal in only one year.

      – Mehta
      Jun 14 at 15:39






    • 4





      That’s a very understandable reaction to the current job market. You’re right that this pressure is there, and you’re right that it’s not a reasonable expectation for most mathematicians. But there’s not much you can do about either of those things and overthinking it isn’t going to help you get there.

      – Noah Snyder
      Jun 14 at 15:46











    • I imagine even the best mathematicians struggle to get published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS), or the Journal of the American Musicological Society (JAMS), or the Journal of African Media Studies (JAMS), or even the Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences (JAMS).

      – Cody Gray
      Jun 14 at 21:37






    • 1





      @Mehta Given that the reviewing process is taking so long, even if you write down something ground breaking soon, it is unlikely that the results would be officially accepted in any top journal in one year's time.

      – Arctic Char
      Jun 29 at 16:13













    11














    11










    11









    You do the best you can do with the ideas you have. Most very good mathematicians can’t come up with a JAMS worthy result every year, and it’s harder when you’re just out of graduate school. You do need to spend some time on some more ambitious ideas as a postdoc, but “more ambitious” doesn’t mean JAMS-worthy and there’s luck in which ideas pay off and when there’s an unexpected connection that turns up when you’re in the middle of a project.



    Yes if you want a job at a top place you might need top publications, but all you can do is do your best with the ideas you have the expertise you developed. Most of us only get a couple publications at that level in our life. Aim to be productive and to increase the level of your publications, but thinking about how to get into JAMS or the Annals isn’t helpful.






    share|improve this answer














    You do the best you can do with the ideas you have. Most very good mathematicians can’t come up with a JAMS worthy result every year, and it’s harder when you’re just out of graduate school. You do need to spend some time on some more ambitious ideas as a postdoc, but “more ambitious” doesn’t mean JAMS-worthy and there’s luck in which ideas pay off and when there’s an unexpected connection that turns up when you’re in the middle of a project.



    Yes if you want a job at a top place you might need top publications, but all you can do is do your best with the ideas you have the expertise you developed. Most of us only get a couple publications at that level in our life. Aim to be productive and to increase the level of your publications, but thinking about how to get into JAMS or the Annals isn’t helpful.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 14 at 9:44









    Noah SnyderNoah Snyder

    18.9k2 gold badges45 silver badges85 bronze badges




    18.9k2 gold badges45 silver badges85 bronze badges










    • 2





      Thanks. I feel as though I'm just starting out and now I feel pressured to have a paper in a very good journal in only one year.

      – Mehta
      Jun 14 at 15:39






    • 4





      That’s a very understandable reaction to the current job market. You’re right that this pressure is there, and you’re right that it’s not a reasonable expectation for most mathematicians. But there’s not much you can do about either of those things and overthinking it isn’t going to help you get there.

      – Noah Snyder
      Jun 14 at 15:46











    • I imagine even the best mathematicians struggle to get published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS), or the Journal of the American Musicological Society (JAMS), or the Journal of African Media Studies (JAMS), or even the Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences (JAMS).

      – Cody Gray
      Jun 14 at 21:37






    • 1





      @Mehta Given that the reviewing process is taking so long, even if you write down something ground breaking soon, it is unlikely that the results would be officially accepted in any top journal in one year's time.

      – Arctic Char
      Jun 29 at 16:13












    • 2





      Thanks. I feel as though I'm just starting out and now I feel pressured to have a paper in a very good journal in only one year.

      – Mehta
      Jun 14 at 15:39






    • 4





      That’s a very understandable reaction to the current job market. You’re right that this pressure is there, and you’re right that it’s not a reasonable expectation for most mathematicians. But there’s not much you can do about either of those things and overthinking it isn’t going to help you get there.

      – Noah Snyder
      Jun 14 at 15:46











    • I imagine even the best mathematicians struggle to get published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS), or the Journal of the American Musicological Society (JAMS), or the Journal of African Media Studies (JAMS), or even the Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences (JAMS).

      – Cody Gray
      Jun 14 at 21:37






    • 1





      @Mehta Given that the reviewing process is taking so long, even if you write down something ground breaking soon, it is unlikely that the results would be officially accepted in any top journal in one year's time.

      – Arctic Char
      Jun 29 at 16:13







    2




    2





    Thanks. I feel as though I'm just starting out and now I feel pressured to have a paper in a very good journal in only one year.

    – Mehta
    Jun 14 at 15:39





    Thanks. I feel as though I'm just starting out and now I feel pressured to have a paper in a very good journal in only one year.

    – Mehta
    Jun 14 at 15:39




    4




    4





    That’s a very understandable reaction to the current job market. You’re right that this pressure is there, and you’re right that it’s not a reasonable expectation for most mathematicians. But there’s not much you can do about either of those things and overthinking it isn’t going to help you get there.

    – Noah Snyder
    Jun 14 at 15:46





    That’s a very understandable reaction to the current job market. You’re right that this pressure is there, and you’re right that it’s not a reasonable expectation for most mathematicians. But there’s not much you can do about either of those things and overthinking it isn’t going to help you get there.

    – Noah Snyder
    Jun 14 at 15:46













    I imagine even the best mathematicians struggle to get published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS), or the Journal of the American Musicological Society (JAMS), or the Journal of African Media Studies (JAMS), or even the Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences (JAMS).

    – Cody Gray
    Jun 14 at 21:37





    I imagine even the best mathematicians struggle to get published in the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS), or the Journal of the American Musicological Society (JAMS), or the Journal of African Media Studies (JAMS), or even the Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences (JAMS).

    – Cody Gray
    Jun 14 at 21:37




    1




    1





    @Mehta Given that the reviewing process is taking so long, even if you write down something ground breaking soon, it is unlikely that the results would be officially accepted in any top journal in one year's time.

    – Arctic Char
    Jun 29 at 16:13





    @Mehta Given that the reviewing process is taking so long, even if you write down something ground breaking soon, it is unlikely that the results would be officially accepted in any top journal in one year's time.

    – Arctic Char
    Jun 29 at 16:13













    9


















    This is orthogonal to the actual question, I realize. The answer of Noah Snyder is direct and seems correct to me. But I'd like to make a couple of recommendations about what to do during the postdoc so that when you enter the actual job market you are in the best possible position whether or not your research has resulted in completed high level papers.



    First, your current backlog seems appropriate with both short and long term projects. You want to maintain and extend that.



    The first recommendation is that you keep a research notebook in which you record ideas, as they occur to you, that might be exploited later when you have time. Researchers in large companies like IBM keep a "patent book" in which they record "possibly patentable" ideas when they occur. You can do the same with any sort of research. Periodically review the entries in your notebook to see whether you have additional extensions of them or can now develop them more fully. This notebook can form the basis of your next "research statement" when you are in the job market. Having a good backlog of projects of various difficulty and in various states of development can be an asset. Research in most fields, including, or maybe especially, mathematics can't really be time boxed. The results come when the insights come. But one big insight is knowing what might be possible to develop - and not forgetting it in the heat of other pursuits. Keep a notebook. Update it constantly.



    And if you get blocked for some reason on your currently most important project, go to the notebook to see what you can do now while the main project gestates for a while. Have several irons in the fire, some hotter than others.



    The other recommendation is to use your time as a postdoc to develop collaborative opportunities. Talk to a lot of people about your and their ideas. Think about whether it is advantageous to work with them. And make sure you capture anything significant (even slightly significant) in your research notebook. But one important benefit of such collaborative relationships is that you might eventually take a job at a small institution that doesn't have a lot of local opportunities. If you have a lot of prior relationships then you can still carry on a rich research program even if you are somewhat isolated. Even a relatively large department can be weak in your particular research area.



    The notebook is useful for another reason, actually. It is useful for a new faculty member to have some ideas available for student research. If you have several partly developed ideas, perhaps they can be taken over by students. You already have given them some thought so it is easier to advise and guide them.






    share|improve this answer
































      9


















      This is orthogonal to the actual question, I realize. The answer of Noah Snyder is direct and seems correct to me. But I'd like to make a couple of recommendations about what to do during the postdoc so that when you enter the actual job market you are in the best possible position whether or not your research has resulted in completed high level papers.



      First, your current backlog seems appropriate with both short and long term projects. You want to maintain and extend that.



      The first recommendation is that you keep a research notebook in which you record ideas, as they occur to you, that might be exploited later when you have time. Researchers in large companies like IBM keep a "patent book" in which they record "possibly patentable" ideas when they occur. You can do the same with any sort of research. Periodically review the entries in your notebook to see whether you have additional extensions of them or can now develop them more fully. This notebook can form the basis of your next "research statement" when you are in the job market. Having a good backlog of projects of various difficulty and in various states of development can be an asset. Research in most fields, including, or maybe especially, mathematics can't really be time boxed. The results come when the insights come. But one big insight is knowing what might be possible to develop - and not forgetting it in the heat of other pursuits. Keep a notebook. Update it constantly.



      And if you get blocked for some reason on your currently most important project, go to the notebook to see what you can do now while the main project gestates for a while. Have several irons in the fire, some hotter than others.



      The other recommendation is to use your time as a postdoc to develop collaborative opportunities. Talk to a lot of people about your and their ideas. Think about whether it is advantageous to work with them. And make sure you capture anything significant (even slightly significant) in your research notebook. But one important benefit of such collaborative relationships is that you might eventually take a job at a small institution that doesn't have a lot of local opportunities. If you have a lot of prior relationships then you can still carry on a rich research program even if you are somewhat isolated. Even a relatively large department can be weak in your particular research area.



      The notebook is useful for another reason, actually. It is useful for a new faculty member to have some ideas available for student research. If you have several partly developed ideas, perhaps they can be taken over by students. You already have given them some thought so it is easier to advise and guide them.






      share|improve this answer






























        9














        9










        9









        This is orthogonal to the actual question, I realize. The answer of Noah Snyder is direct and seems correct to me. But I'd like to make a couple of recommendations about what to do during the postdoc so that when you enter the actual job market you are in the best possible position whether or not your research has resulted in completed high level papers.



        First, your current backlog seems appropriate with both short and long term projects. You want to maintain and extend that.



        The first recommendation is that you keep a research notebook in which you record ideas, as they occur to you, that might be exploited later when you have time. Researchers in large companies like IBM keep a "patent book" in which they record "possibly patentable" ideas when they occur. You can do the same with any sort of research. Periodically review the entries in your notebook to see whether you have additional extensions of them or can now develop them more fully. This notebook can form the basis of your next "research statement" when you are in the job market. Having a good backlog of projects of various difficulty and in various states of development can be an asset. Research in most fields, including, or maybe especially, mathematics can't really be time boxed. The results come when the insights come. But one big insight is knowing what might be possible to develop - and not forgetting it in the heat of other pursuits. Keep a notebook. Update it constantly.



        And if you get blocked for some reason on your currently most important project, go to the notebook to see what you can do now while the main project gestates for a while. Have several irons in the fire, some hotter than others.



        The other recommendation is to use your time as a postdoc to develop collaborative opportunities. Talk to a lot of people about your and their ideas. Think about whether it is advantageous to work with them. And make sure you capture anything significant (even slightly significant) in your research notebook. But one important benefit of such collaborative relationships is that you might eventually take a job at a small institution that doesn't have a lot of local opportunities. If you have a lot of prior relationships then you can still carry on a rich research program even if you are somewhat isolated. Even a relatively large department can be weak in your particular research area.



        The notebook is useful for another reason, actually. It is useful for a new faculty member to have some ideas available for student research. If you have several partly developed ideas, perhaps they can be taken over by students. You already have given them some thought so it is easier to advise and guide them.






        share|improve this answer
















        This is orthogonal to the actual question, I realize. The answer of Noah Snyder is direct and seems correct to me. But I'd like to make a couple of recommendations about what to do during the postdoc so that when you enter the actual job market you are in the best possible position whether or not your research has resulted in completed high level papers.



        First, your current backlog seems appropriate with both short and long term projects. You want to maintain and extend that.



        The first recommendation is that you keep a research notebook in which you record ideas, as they occur to you, that might be exploited later when you have time. Researchers in large companies like IBM keep a "patent book" in which they record "possibly patentable" ideas when they occur. You can do the same with any sort of research. Periodically review the entries in your notebook to see whether you have additional extensions of them or can now develop them more fully. This notebook can form the basis of your next "research statement" when you are in the job market. Having a good backlog of projects of various difficulty and in various states of development can be an asset. Research in most fields, including, or maybe especially, mathematics can't really be time boxed. The results come when the insights come. But one big insight is knowing what might be possible to develop - and not forgetting it in the heat of other pursuits. Keep a notebook. Update it constantly.



        And if you get blocked for some reason on your currently most important project, go to the notebook to see what you can do now while the main project gestates for a while. Have several irons in the fire, some hotter than others.



        The other recommendation is to use your time as a postdoc to develop collaborative opportunities. Talk to a lot of people about your and their ideas. Think about whether it is advantageous to work with them. And make sure you capture anything significant (even slightly significant) in your research notebook. But one important benefit of such collaborative relationships is that you might eventually take a job at a small institution that doesn't have a lot of local opportunities. If you have a lot of prior relationships then you can still carry on a rich research program even if you are somewhat isolated. Even a relatively large department can be weak in your particular research area.



        The notebook is useful for another reason, actually. It is useful for a new faculty member to have some ideas available for student research. If you have several partly developed ideas, perhaps they can be taken over by students. You already have given them some thought so it is easier to advise and guide them.







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited Jun 14 at 11:49

























        answered Jun 14 at 11:21









        BuffyBuffy

        91.7k23 gold badges283 silver badges394 bronze badges




        91.7k23 gold badges283 silver badges394 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131880%2fis-my-research-statement-supposed-to-lead-to-papers-in-top-journals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?