Sum of the first natural numbers: how many and what are the most common methods to verify it? [duplicate]Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+ldots+n$?Spivak's Calculus (Chapter 2, Exercise 17)What are the most famous (common used) precalculus books and its differences?Compute $ax^3+by^3$ given $ax^2+by^2$ and $ax+by$.Calculate the Gauss integral without squaring it firstSum of first n natural numbers proofPerforming Induction on the process of Induction (Function Spaces?)Summation of series of first $2n$ natural numbers and first $3n$ natural numbersProof by induction (Recursion)sum of the first $n^2$ natural numbers closed form
During a long rest if someone is fully rested, can they keep watch longer than 2 hours?
Was there a "mechanist" program of early rationalists, like Descartes and Leibniz?
How can I repair a leak in a PVC water line without bringing down the system for an extended period of time?
Is publishing runnable code instead of pseudo code shunned?
Number puzzle. Can you replace the question mark?
What are examples of (collections of) papers which "close" a field?
Evil plans - how do you come up with interesting ones?
When did Hebrew start replacing Yiddish?
Team members' and manager's behaviour is indifferent after I announce my intention to leave in 8 months
Is it possible for a moon to have a higher surface gravity than the planet it is attached to?
Conditional types in TypeScript
Did Roger Rabbit exist prior to the film "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?"
Do you need to reveal which specific tunnel you’re attempting to claim?
What method to solve a sparse complex symmetric (non-Hermitian) system?
Can two moons have intersecting orbits yet be guaranteed not to collide?
Are optimal hyperparameters still optimal for a deeper neural net architecture?
Prospective employer asking for my current pay slip during interview
Is there a way to add salted hashing to my user authentication without breaking my former login server
Can we reduce power consumption of digital interfaces by using high impedance transmission lines?
Furnace: pipe is leaking when switched to air-conditioning
How do electric hot water heaters explode and what can be done to prevent that from happening?
Is it academically dishonest to submit the same project to two different classes in the same semester?
How to tell my Mom that I don't care about someone without upsetting her?
Using brushes as low-volume drumsticks
Sum of the first natural numbers: how many and what are the most common methods to verify it? [duplicate]
Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+ldots+n$?Spivak's Calculus (Chapter 2, Exercise 17)What are the most famous (common used) precalculus books and its differences?Compute $ax^3+by^3$ given $ax^2+by^2$ and $ax+by$.Calculate the Gauss integral without squaring it firstSum of first n natural numbers proofPerforming Induction on the process of Induction (Function Spaces?)Summation of series of first $2n$ natural numbers and first $3n$ natural numbersProof by induction (Recursion)sum of the first $n^2$ natural numbers closed form
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+ldots+n$?
32 answers
We know that Gauss has shown that the sum $S$ of the first $n$ natural numbers is given by the relation:
$$S=fracn(n+1)2 tag*$$
The proof that I remember most frequently is as follows:
Let be $S=1+2+dotsb+(n-1)+n tag1$ We can write $S$ it also as: $tag2 S=n+(n-1)+dotsb+2+1.$
By adding up member to member we get:
$tag3 2S=underbrace(n+1)+(n+1)+dotsb+2+1_n-mathrmtimes.$
Hence we obtain the $(^ast)$.
How many other simple methods exist to calculate the sum of the first natural numbers?
algebra-precalculus induction alternative-proof
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Aloizio Macedo♦ Sep 27 at 6:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+ldots+n$?
32 answers
We know that Gauss has shown that the sum $S$ of the first $n$ natural numbers is given by the relation:
$$S=fracn(n+1)2 tag*$$
The proof that I remember most frequently is as follows:
Let be $S=1+2+dotsb+(n-1)+n tag1$ We can write $S$ it also as: $tag2 S=n+(n-1)+dotsb+2+1.$
By adding up member to member we get:
$tag3 2S=underbrace(n+1)+(n+1)+dotsb+2+1_n-mathrmtimes.$
Hence we obtain the $(^ast)$.
How many other simple methods exist to calculate the sum of the first natural numbers?
algebra-precalculus induction alternative-proof
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Aloizio Macedo♦ Sep 27 at 6:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
Induction. $$
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Sep 26 at 21:24
$begingroup$
@copper.hat Yes, of course. But I remember that there is another simple form which has the similar form of my question.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:26
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+ldots+n$?
32 answers
We know that Gauss has shown that the sum $S$ of the first $n$ natural numbers is given by the relation:
$$S=fracn(n+1)2 tag*$$
The proof that I remember most frequently is as follows:
Let be $S=1+2+dotsb+(n-1)+n tag1$ We can write $S$ it also as: $tag2 S=n+(n-1)+dotsb+2+1.$
By adding up member to member we get:
$tag3 2S=underbrace(n+1)+(n+1)+dotsb+2+1_n-mathrmtimes.$
Hence we obtain the $(^ast)$.
How many other simple methods exist to calculate the sum of the first natural numbers?
algebra-precalculus induction alternative-proof
$endgroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+ldots+n$?
32 answers
We know that Gauss has shown that the sum $S$ of the first $n$ natural numbers is given by the relation:
$$S=fracn(n+1)2 tag*$$
The proof that I remember most frequently is as follows:
Let be $S=1+2+dotsb+(n-1)+n tag1$ We can write $S$ it also as: $tag2 S=n+(n-1)+dotsb+2+1.$
By adding up member to member we get:
$tag3 2S=underbrace(n+1)+(n+1)+dotsb+2+1_n-mathrmtimes.$
Hence we obtain the $(^ast)$.
How many other simple methods exist to calculate the sum of the first natural numbers?
This question already has an answer here:
Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+ldots+n$?
32 answers
algebra-precalculus induction alternative-proof
algebra-precalculus induction alternative-proof
asked Sep 26 at 21:20
SebastianoSebastiano
6192 silver badges18 bronze badges
6192 silver badges18 bronze badges
marked as duplicate by Aloizio Macedo♦ Sep 27 at 6:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Aloizio Macedo♦ Sep 27 at 6:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Aloizio Macedo♦ Sep 27 at 6:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
Induction. $$
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Sep 26 at 21:24
$begingroup$
@copper.hat Yes, of course. But I remember that there is another simple form which has the similar form of my question.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:26
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Induction. $$
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Sep 26 at 21:24
$begingroup$
@copper.hat Yes, of course. But I remember that there is another simple form which has the similar form of my question.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:26
$begingroup$
Induction. $$
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Sep 26 at 21:24
$begingroup$
Induction. $$
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Sep 26 at 21:24
$begingroup$
@copper.hat Yes, of course. But I remember that there is another simple form which has the similar form of my question.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@copper.hat Yes, of course. But I remember that there is another simple form which has the similar form of my question.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:26
add a comment
|
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a proof using ideas from probability theory. Let $X$ be a random variable that is uniformly distributed on the set $1,dotsc, n$. Then it is easy to see that $n+1-X$ has the same distribution as $X$ whence
$$
E(n+1-X)=EX
$$
i.e. $n+1-EX=EX$ so
$$
EX=fracn+12tag0.
$$
But on the other hand,
$$
EX=sum_k=1^n kP(X=k)=frac1nsum_k=1^n k.tag1
$$
Combining $(0)$ and $(1)$ we get that
$$
sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for all users, and also for you. My sincere "grazie".
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 22:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Certainly overkill, but we can do this with the method of generating functions: let
$$f(x)=sum_k=0^nx^n=frac1-x^n+11-x$$
So that $f'(1)=sum_k=0^nk$. We just need to find $f'(x)$, and we proceed as usual:
$$fracddxfrac1-x^n+11-x=frac-(n+1)x^n(1-x)+(1-x^n+1)(1-x)^2$$
Taking the limit as $xto1$, we have by L'hopital's rule and after simplification,
$$lim_xto1frac-n(n+1)x^n-1(1-x)-2(1-x)=lim_xto1fracn(n+1)2=fracn(n+1)2$$
From which we obtain the conclusion.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you’re going with generating functions, why not instead compute $[x^n-1](1-x)^-3$? That only requires using the Generalized Binomial Theorem.
$endgroup$
– amd
Sep 28 at 7:29
$begingroup$
@amd I never said you couldn't do that, of course. That would be another way.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Sep 28 at 7:33
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The expression of $S_n$ must be a quadratic polynomial (because the difference $S_n-S_n-1=n$ is a linear polynomial). As $S_0=0$, it is of the form $an^2+bn.$
By identification,
$$begincasesS_1=a+b=1,\S_2=4a+2b=3endcases$$
and $$a=b=dfrac12.$$
The Lagrangian polynomial by $(0,0)$, $(1,1)$, $(2,3)$ is $dfracx^22+dfrac x2$.
$$S(n)-S(n-1)=an^2+bn-a(n-1)^2-b(n-1)=a(2n-1)+b=n$$
so that
$$a=b=dfrac12.$$
A posteriori:
$$S_n-S_n-1=fracn(n+1)2-frac(n-1)n2=n.$$
As an arithmetic progression is linear, the average term is the average of the extreme terms.
$$fracS_nn=frac1+n2$$ and $$S_n=fracn(n+1)2.$$
Let the function defined by a geometric series
$$f(x):=sum_k=0^n x^k=fracx^n+1-1x-1.$$
We differentiate on $x$,
$$f'(x)=sum_k=0^n k x^k-1=fracx^n+1-1x-1=frac(n+1)x^n(x-1)-(x^n+1-1)(x-1)^2.$$
Then with $x=1$, using L'Hospital,
$$f'(1)=sum_k=0^n k =lim_xto0fracnx^n+1-(n+1)x^n+1(x-1)^2 =lim_xto0fracn(n+1)x^n-(n+1)nx^n-12(x-1)=fracn(n+1)2.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much also to you. Have you used the telescopic rule? :o)
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:37
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The telescoping can be discussed in terms of binomial coefficients, viz.$$sum_k=1^nk=sum_k=1^nbinomk1=binomn+12$$by the hockey-stick identity. But we can also derive that without telescoping by a double-counting argument.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@J.G. Very difficult for my students to understand. However thank you for your precious comment.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:45
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The double-counting argument I mentioned might be the easiest way for them to understand it.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:48
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The identity
$$sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2$$
is a classical result which can be easily proved by the following
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Use can use the sum of AP to arrive at the same conclusion.
$a=1, d=1$
$$S_n = nover 2(2a+(n-1)d)$$
$$S_n = nover 2(2+(n-1))$$
$$S_n = nover 2(n+1)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sam. Excuse me very much. What is the word AP? :-(
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano Arithmetic progression.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:41
add a comment
|
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a proof using ideas from probability theory. Let $X$ be a random variable that is uniformly distributed on the set $1,dotsc, n$. Then it is easy to see that $n+1-X$ has the same distribution as $X$ whence
$$
E(n+1-X)=EX
$$
i.e. $n+1-EX=EX$ so
$$
EX=fracn+12tag0.
$$
But on the other hand,
$$
EX=sum_k=1^n kP(X=k)=frac1nsum_k=1^n k.tag1
$$
Combining $(0)$ and $(1)$ we get that
$$
sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for all users, and also for you. My sincere "grazie".
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 22:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Here is a proof using ideas from probability theory. Let $X$ be a random variable that is uniformly distributed on the set $1,dotsc, n$. Then it is easy to see that $n+1-X$ has the same distribution as $X$ whence
$$
E(n+1-X)=EX
$$
i.e. $n+1-EX=EX$ so
$$
EX=fracn+12tag0.
$$
But on the other hand,
$$
EX=sum_k=1^n kP(X=k)=frac1nsum_k=1^n k.tag1
$$
Combining $(0)$ and $(1)$ we get that
$$
sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for all users, and also for you. My sincere "grazie".
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 22:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Here is a proof using ideas from probability theory. Let $X$ be a random variable that is uniformly distributed on the set $1,dotsc, n$. Then it is easy to see that $n+1-X$ has the same distribution as $X$ whence
$$
E(n+1-X)=EX
$$
i.e. $n+1-EX=EX$ so
$$
EX=fracn+12tag0.
$$
But on the other hand,
$$
EX=sum_k=1^n kP(X=k)=frac1nsum_k=1^n k.tag1
$$
Combining $(0)$ and $(1)$ we get that
$$
sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2.
$$
$endgroup$
Here is a proof using ideas from probability theory. Let $X$ be a random variable that is uniformly distributed on the set $1,dotsc, n$. Then it is easy to see that $n+1-X$ has the same distribution as $X$ whence
$$
E(n+1-X)=EX
$$
i.e. $n+1-EX=EX$ so
$$
EX=fracn+12tag0.
$$
But on the other hand,
$$
EX=sum_k=1^n kP(X=k)=frac1nsum_k=1^n k.tag1
$$
Combining $(0)$ and $(1)$ we get that
$$
sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2.
$$
answered Sep 26 at 22:15
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
26.4k4 gold badges15 silver badges57 bronze badges
26.4k4 gold badges15 silver badges57 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thank you for all users, and also for you. My sincere "grazie".
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 22:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Thank you for all users, and also for you. My sincere "grazie".
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 22:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for all users, and also for you. My sincere "grazie".
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 22:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for all users, and also for you. My sincere "grazie".
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 22:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Certainly overkill, but we can do this with the method of generating functions: let
$$f(x)=sum_k=0^nx^n=frac1-x^n+11-x$$
So that $f'(1)=sum_k=0^nk$. We just need to find $f'(x)$, and we proceed as usual:
$$fracddxfrac1-x^n+11-x=frac-(n+1)x^n(1-x)+(1-x^n+1)(1-x)^2$$
Taking the limit as $xto1$, we have by L'hopital's rule and after simplification,
$$lim_xto1frac-n(n+1)x^n-1(1-x)-2(1-x)=lim_xto1fracn(n+1)2=fracn(n+1)2$$
From which we obtain the conclusion.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you’re going with generating functions, why not instead compute $[x^n-1](1-x)^-3$? That only requires using the Generalized Binomial Theorem.
$endgroup$
– amd
Sep 28 at 7:29
$begingroup$
@amd I never said you couldn't do that, of course. That would be another way.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Sep 28 at 7:33
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Certainly overkill, but we can do this with the method of generating functions: let
$$f(x)=sum_k=0^nx^n=frac1-x^n+11-x$$
So that $f'(1)=sum_k=0^nk$. We just need to find $f'(x)$, and we proceed as usual:
$$fracddxfrac1-x^n+11-x=frac-(n+1)x^n(1-x)+(1-x^n+1)(1-x)^2$$
Taking the limit as $xto1$, we have by L'hopital's rule and after simplification,
$$lim_xto1frac-n(n+1)x^n-1(1-x)-2(1-x)=lim_xto1fracn(n+1)2=fracn(n+1)2$$
From which we obtain the conclusion.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you’re going with generating functions, why not instead compute $[x^n-1](1-x)^-3$? That only requires using the Generalized Binomial Theorem.
$endgroup$
– amd
Sep 28 at 7:29
$begingroup$
@amd I never said you couldn't do that, of course. That would be another way.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Sep 28 at 7:33
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Certainly overkill, but we can do this with the method of generating functions: let
$$f(x)=sum_k=0^nx^n=frac1-x^n+11-x$$
So that $f'(1)=sum_k=0^nk$. We just need to find $f'(x)$, and we proceed as usual:
$$fracddxfrac1-x^n+11-x=frac-(n+1)x^n(1-x)+(1-x^n+1)(1-x)^2$$
Taking the limit as $xto1$, we have by L'hopital's rule and after simplification,
$$lim_xto1frac-n(n+1)x^n-1(1-x)-2(1-x)=lim_xto1fracn(n+1)2=fracn(n+1)2$$
From which we obtain the conclusion.
$endgroup$
Certainly overkill, but we can do this with the method of generating functions: let
$$f(x)=sum_k=0^nx^n=frac1-x^n+11-x$$
So that $f'(1)=sum_k=0^nk$. We just need to find $f'(x)$, and we proceed as usual:
$$fracddxfrac1-x^n+11-x=frac-(n+1)x^n(1-x)+(1-x^n+1)(1-x)^2$$
Taking the limit as $xto1$, we have by L'hopital's rule and after simplification,
$$lim_xto1frac-n(n+1)x^n-1(1-x)-2(1-x)=lim_xto1fracn(n+1)2=fracn(n+1)2$$
From which we obtain the conclusion.
answered Sep 27 at 6:03
YiFanYiFan
11.2k4 gold badges16 silver badges43 bronze badges
11.2k4 gold badges16 silver badges43 bronze badges
$begingroup$
If you’re going with generating functions, why not instead compute $[x^n-1](1-x)^-3$? That only requires using the Generalized Binomial Theorem.
$endgroup$
– amd
Sep 28 at 7:29
$begingroup$
@amd I never said you couldn't do that, of course. That would be another way.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Sep 28 at 7:33
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If you’re going with generating functions, why not instead compute $[x^n-1](1-x)^-3$? That only requires using the Generalized Binomial Theorem.
$endgroup$
– amd
Sep 28 at 7:29
$begingroup$
@amd I never said you couldn't do that, of course. That would be another way.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Sep 28 at 7:33
$begingroup$
If you’re going with generating functions, why not instead compute $[x^n-1](1-x)^-3$? That only requires using the Generalized Binomial Theorem.
$endgroup$
– amd
Sep 28 at 7:29
$begingroup$
If you’re going with generating functions, why not instead compute $[x^n-1](1-x)^-3$? That only requires using the Generalized Binomial Theorem.
$endgroup$
– amd
Sep 28 at 7:29
$begingroup$
@amd I never said you couldn't do that, of course. That would be another way.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Sep 28 at 7:33
$begingroup$
@amd I never said you couldn't do that, of course. That would be another way.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Sep 28 at 7:33
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The expression of $S_n$ must be a quadratic polynomial (because the difference $S_n-S_n-1=n$ is a linear polynomial). As $S_0=0$, it is of the form $an^2+bn.$
By identification,
$$begincasesS_1=a+b=1,\S_2=4a+2b=3endcases$$
and $$a=b=dfrac12.$$
The Lagrangian polynomial by $(0,0)$, $(1,1)$, $(2,3)$ is $dfracx^22+dfrac x2$.
$$S(n)-S(n-1)=an^2+bn-a(n-1)^2-b(n-1)=a(2n-1)+b=n$$
so that
$$a=b=dfrac12.$$
A posteriori:
$$S_n-S_n-1=fracn(n+1)2-frac(n-1)n2=n.$$
As an arithmetic progression is linear, the average term is the average of the extreme terms.
$$fracS_nn=frac1+n2$$ and $$S_n=fracn(n+1)2.$$
Let the function defined by a geometric series
$$f(x):=sum_k=0^n x^k=fracx^n+1-1x-1.$$
We differentiate on $x$,
$$f'(x)=sum_k=0^n k x^k-1=fracx^n+1-1x-1=frac(n+1)x^n(x-1)-(x^n+1-1)(x-1)^2.$$
Then with $x=1$, using L'Hospital,
$$f'(1)=sum_k=0^n k =lim_xto0fracnx^n+1-(n+1)x^n+1(x-1)^2 =lim_xto0fracn(n+1)x^n-(n+1)nx^n-12(x-1)=fracn(n+1)2.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much also to you. Have you used the telescopic rule? :o)
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:37
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The telescoping can be discussed in terms of binomial coefficients, viz.$$sum_k=1^nk=sum_k=1^nbinomk1=binomn+12$$by the hockey-stick identity. But we can also derive that without telescoping by a double-counting argument.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@J.G. Very difficult for my students to understand. However thank you for your precious comment.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:45
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The double-counting argument I mentioned might be the easiest way for them to understand it.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:48
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The expression of $S_n$ must be a quadratic polynomial (because the difference $S_n-S_n-1=n$ is a linear polynomial). As $S_0=0$, it is of the form $an^2+bn.$
By identification,
$$begincasesS_1=a+b=1,\S_2=4a+2b=3endcases$$
and $$a=b=dfrac12.$$
The Lagrangian polynomial by $(0,0)$, $(1,1)$, $(2,3)$ is $dfracx^22+dfrac x2$.
$$S(n)-S(n-1)=an^2+bn-a(n-1)^2-b(n-1)=a(2n-1)+b=n$$
so that
$$a=b=dfrac12.$$
A posteriori:
$$S_n-S_n-1=fracn(n+1)2-frac(n-1)n2=n.$$
As an arithmetic progression is linear, the average term is the average of the extreme terms.
$$fracS_nn=frac1+n2$$ and $$S_n=fracn(n+1)2.$$
Let the function defined by a geometric series
$$f(x):=sum_k=0^n x^k=fracx^n+1-1x-1.$$
We differentiate on $x$,
$$f'(x)=sum_k=0^n k x^k-1=fracx^n+1-1x-1=frac(n+1)x^n(x-1)-(x^n+1-1)(x-1)^2.$$
Then with $x=1$, using L'Hospital,
$$f'(1)=sum_k=0^n k =lim_xto0fracnx^n+1-(n+1)x^n+1(x-1)^2 =lim_xto0fracn(n+1)x^n-(n+1)nx^n-12(x-1)=fracn(n+1)2.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much also to you. Have you used the telescopic rule? :o)
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:37
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The telescoping can be discussed in terms of binomial coefficients, viz.$$sum_k=1^nk=sum_k=1^nbinomk1=binomn+12$$by the hockey-stick identity. But we can also derive that without telescoping by a double-counting argument.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@J.G. Very difficult for my students to understand. However thank you for your precious comment.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:45
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The double-counting argument I mentioned might be the easiest way for them to understand it.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:48
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The expression of $S_n$ must be a quadratic polynomial (because the difference $S_n-S_n-1=n$ is a linear polynomial). As $S_0=0$, it is of the form $an^2+bn.$
By identification,
$$begincasesS_1=a+b=1,\S_2=4a+2b=3endcases$$
and $$a=b=dfrac12.$$
The Lagrangian polynomial by $(0,0)$, $(1,1)$, $(2,3)$ is $dfracx^22+dfrac x2$.
$$S(n)-S(n-1)=an^2+bn-a(n-1)^2-b(n-1)=a(2n-1)+b=n$$
so that
$$a=b=dfrac12.$$
A posteriori:
$$S_n-S_n-1=fracn(n+1)2-frac(n-1)n2=n.$$
As an arithmetic progression is linear, the average term is the average of the extreme terms.
$$fracS_nn=frac1+n2$$ and $$S_n=fracn(n+1)2.$$
Let the function defined by a geometric series
$$f(x):=sum_k=0^n x^k=fracx^n+1-1x-1.$$
We differentiate on $x$,
$$f'(x)=sum_k=0^n k x^k-1=fracx^n+1-1x-1=frac(n+1)x^n(x-1)-(x^n+1-1)(x-1)^2.$$
Then with $x=1$, using L'Hospital,
$$f'(1)=sum_k=0^n k =lim_xto0fracnx^n+1-(n+1)x^n+1(x-1)^2 =lim_xto0fracn(n+1)x^n-(n+1)nx^n-12(x-1)=fracn(n+1)2.$$
$endgroup$
The expression of $S_n$ must be a quadratic polynomial (because the difference $S_n-S_n-1=n$ is a linear polynomial). As $S_0=0$, it is of the form $an^2+bn.$
By identification,
$$begincasesS_1=a+b=1,\S_2=4a+2b=3endcases$$
and $$a=b=dfrac12.$$
The Lagrangian polynomial by $(0,0)$, $(1,1)$, $(2,3)$ is $dfracx^22+dfrac x2$.
$$S(n)-S(n-1)=an^2+bn-a(n-1)^2-b(n-1)=a(2n-1)+b=n$$
so that
$$a=b=dfrac12.$$
A posteriori:
$$S_n-S_n-1=fracn(n+1)2-frac(n-1)n2=n.$$
As an arithmetic progression is linear, the average term is the average of the extreme terms.
$$fracS_nn=frac1+n2$$ and $$S_n=fracn(n+1)2.$$
Let the function defined by a geometric series
$$f(x):=sum_k=0^n x^k=fracx^n+1-1x-1.$$
We differentiate on $x$,
$$f'(x)=sum_k=0^n k x^k-1=fracx^n+1-1x-1=frac(n+1)x^n(x-1)-(x^n+1-1)(x-1)^2.$$
Then with $x=1$, using L'Hospital,
$$f'(1)=sum_k=0^n k =lim_xto0fracnx^n+1-(n+1)x^n+1(x-1)^2 =lim_xto0fracn(n+1)x^n-(n+1)nx^n-12(x-1)=fracn(n+1)2.$$
edited Sep 27 at 8:33
answered Sep 26 at 21:36
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
152k13 gold badges92 silver badges251 bronze badges
152k13 gold badges92 silver badges251 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thank you very much also to you. Have you used the telescopic rule? :o)
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:37
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The telescoping can be discussed in terms of binomial coefficients, viz.$$sum_k=1^nk=sum_k=1^nbinomk1=binomn+12$$by the hockey-stick identity. But we can also derive that without telescoping by a double-counting argument.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@J.G. Very difficult for my students to understand. However thank you for your precious comment.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:45
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The double-counting argument I mentioned might be the easiest way for them to understand it.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:48
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Thank you very much also to you. Have you used the telescopic rule? :o)
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:37
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The telescoping can be discussed in terms of binomial coefficients, viz.$$sum_k=1^nk=sum_k=1^nbinomk1=binomn+12$$by the hockey-stick identity. But we can also derive that without telescoping by a double-counting argument.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@J.G. Very difficult for my students to understand. However thank you for your precious comment.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:45
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The double-counting argument I mentioned might be the easiest way for them to understand it.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:48
$begingroup$
Thank you very much also to you. Have you used the telescopic rule? :o)
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:37
$begingroup$
Thank you very much also to you. Have you used the telescopic rule? :o)
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:37
1
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The telescoping can be discussed in terms of binomial coefficients, viz.$$sum_k=1^nk=sum_k=1^nbinomk1=binomn+12$$by the hockey-stick identity. But we can also derive that without telescoping by a double-counting argument.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The telescoping can be discussed in terms of binomial coefficients, viz.$$sum_k=1^nk=sum_k=1^nbinomk1=binomn+12$$by the hockey-stick identity. But we can also derive that without telescoping by a double-counting argument.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@J.G. Very difficult for my students to understand. However thank you for your precious comment.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:45
$begingroup$
@J.G. Very difficult for my students to understand. However thank you for your precious comment.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:45
1
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The double-counting argument I mentioned might be the easiest way for them to understand it.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:48
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano The double-counting argument I mentioned might be the easiest way for them to understand it.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:48
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The identity
$$sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2$$
is a classical result which can be easily proved by the following
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The identity
$$sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2$$
is a classical result which can be easily proved by the following
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The identity
$$sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2$$
is a classical result which can be easily proved by the following
$endgroup$
The identity
$$sum_k=1^nk=fracn(n+1)2$$
is a classical result which can be easily proved by the following
answered Sep 26 at 21:31
useruser
111k10 gold badges49 silver badges102 bronze badges
111k10 gold badges49 silver badges102 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Use can use the sum of AP to arrive at the same conclusion.
$a=1, d=1$
$$S_n = nover 2(2a+(n-1)d)$$
$$S_n = nover 2(2+(n-1))$$
$$S_n = nover 2(n+1)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sam. Excuse me very much. What is the word AP? :-(
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano Arithmetic progression.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:41
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Use can use the sum of AP to arrive at the same conclusion.
$a=1, d=1$
$$S_n = nover 2(2a+(n-1)d)$$
$$S_n = nover 2(2+(n-1))$$
$$S_n = nover 2(n+1)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sam. Excuse me very much. What is the word AP? :-(
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano Arithmetic progression.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:41
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Use can use the sum of AP to arrive at the same conclusion.
$a=1, d=1$
$$S_n = nover 2(2a+(n-1)d)$$
$$S_n = nover 2(2+(n-1))$$
$$S_n = nover 2(n+1)$$
$endgroup$
Use can use the sum of AP to arrive at the same conclusion.
$a=1, d=1$
$$S_n = nover 2(2a+(n-1)d)$$
$$S_n = nover 2(2+(n-1))$$
$$S_n = nover 2(n+1)$$
answered Sep 26 at 21:37
SamSam
9111 silver badge11 bronze badges
9111 silver badge11 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Sam. Excuse me very much. What is the word AP? :-(
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano Arithmetic progression.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:41
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Sam. Excuse me very much. What is the word AP? :-(
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:40
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano Arithmetic progression.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:41
$begingroup$
Sam. Excuse me very much. What is the word AP? :-(
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
Sam. Excuse me very much. What is the word AP? :-(
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:40
1
1
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano Arithmetic progression.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:41
$begingroup$
@Sebastiano Arithmetic progression.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Sep 26 at 21:41
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Induction. $$
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Sep 26 at 21:24
$begingroup$
@copper.hat Yes, of course. But I remember that there is another simple form which has the similar form of my question.
$endgroup$
– Sebastiano
Sep 26 at 21:26