How to remove broken PPAs using Terminal at once? [on hold] Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to cleanly remove a badly installed .deb?How to use apt-get to install packages without one specify package?How to use sed to edit /var/log/apt/history.log in order to apt-get remove numerous installed packages?Automatically disable a ppa'apt-get update' fails when using proxyHow Do I fix my particular broken package system?Install multiple ppas at once via terminal without using scriptHow to purge Steam ppa completelyDpkg: error processing package linux-image-extra-3.13.0-93-genericCommand not found: apt-get

Seeking colloquialism for “just because”

Why light coming from distant stars is not discreet?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?

Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

What is Arya's weapon design?

When do you get frequent flier miles - when you buy, or when you fly?

ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order

51k Euros annually for a family of 4 in Berlin: Is it enough?

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

What is known about the Ubaid lizard-people figurines?

How to find all the available tools in mac terminal?

Extract all GPU name, model and GPU ram

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

How does debian/ubuntu knows a package has a updated version

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes



How to remove broken PPAs using Terminal at once? [on hold]



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to cleanly remove a badly installed .deb?How to use apt-get to install packages without one specify package?How to use sed to edit /var/log/apt/history.log in order to apt-get remove numerous installed packages?Automatically disable a ppa'apt-get update' fails when using proxyHow Do I fix my particular broken package system?Install multiple ppas at once via terminal without using scriptHow to purge Steam ppa completelyDpkg: error processing package linux-image-extra-3.13.0-93-genericCommand not found: apt-get



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








-1















I have lots of broken PPAs that I like to get rid of, but since I have lots of PPAs in general, deleting them by hand is not an option. I want to somehow delete all broken PPAs at once. Thank you for your help!



EDIT: This is the result of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. I think this might be a good indicator whether a PPA is broken or not.










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho Apr 13 at 15:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Bug reports and problems specific to development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad so that developers can see, track and fix these issues." – Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1





    I don't know any general method, that can tell the difference between good and broken PPAs. But you can try sudo add-apt-repository -r ppa:whatever-you-want-to-remove for each PPA that you want to get rid of.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:53












  • @sudodus PPAs that fail when calling apt-get update shall be a good indicator IMO.

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 18:56











  • In that case you can use that information in a shellscript file in order to decide which PPAs to treat with add-apt-repository -r

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:58











  • @sudodus I'm not very good with shellscripts. Could you write me one? here's the output of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. pastebin.com/MiiLHZYX

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 19:05











  • I don't say no, but I can't do it now. Let us hope that someone else has better time this weekend and can help you.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 19:15

















-1















I have lots of broken PPAs that I like to get rid of, but since I have lots of PPAs in general, deleting them by hand is not an option. I want to somehow delete all broken PPAs at once. Thank you for your help!



EDIT: This is the result of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. I think this might be a good indicator whether a PPA is broken or not.










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho Apr 13 at 15:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Bug reports and problems specific to development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad so that developers can see, track and fix these issues." – Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1





    I don't know any general method, that can tell the difference between good and broken PPAs. But you can try sudo add-apt-repository -r ppa:whatever-you-want-to-remove for each PPA that you want to get rid of.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:53












  • @sudodus PPAs that fail when calling apt-get update shall be a good indicator IMO.

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 18:56











  • In that case you can use that information in a shellscript file in order to decide which PPAs to treat with add-apt-repository -r

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:58











  • @sudodus I'm not very good with shellscripts. Could you write me one? here's the output of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. pastebin.com/MiiLHZYX

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 19:05











  • I don't say no, but I can't do it now. Let us hope that someone else has better time this weekend and can help you.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 19:15













-1












-1








-1








I have lots of broken PPAs that I like to get rid of, but since I have lots of PPAs in general, deleting them by hand is not an option. I want to somehow delete all broken PPAs at once. Thank you for your help!



EDIT: This is the result of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. I think this might be a good indicator whether a PPA is broken or not.










share|improve this question
















I have lots of broken PPAs that I like to get rid of, but since I have lots of PPAs in general, deleting them by hand is not an option. I want to somehow delete all broken PPAs at once. Thank you for your help!



EDIT: This is the result of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. I think this might be a good indicator whether a PPA is broken or not.







apt lubuntu ppa 19.04






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 13 at 5:49







Farhood ET

















asked Apr 12 at 18:35









Farhood ETFarhood ET

1217




1217




put on hold as off-topic by Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho Apr 13 at 15:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Bug reports and problems specific to development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad so that developers can see, track and fix these issues." – Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho Apr 13 at 15:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Bug reports and problems specific to development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad so that developers can see, track and fix these issues." – Kulfy, fkraiem, karel, N0rbert, Eric Carvalho
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 1





    I don't know any general method, that can tell the difference between good and broken PPAs. But you can try sudo add-apt-repository -r ppa:whatever-you-want-to-remove for each PPA that you want to get rid of.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:53












  • @sudodus PPAs that fail when calling apt-get update shall be a good indicator IMO.

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 18:56











  • In that case you can use that information in a shellscript file in order to decide which PPAs to treat with add-apt-repository -r

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:58











  • @sudodus I'm not very good with shellscripts. Could you write me one? here's the output of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. pastebin.com/MiiLHZYX

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 19:05











  • I don't say no, but I can't do it now. Let us hope that someone else has better time this weekend and can help you.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 19:15












  • 1





    I don't know any general method, that can tell the difference between good and broken PPAs. But you can try sudo add-apt-repository -r ppa:whatever-you-want-to-remove for each PPA that you want to get rid of.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:53












  • @sudodus PPAs that fail when calling apt-get update shall be a good indicator IMO.

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 18:56











  • In that case you can use that information in a shellscript file in order to decide which PPAs to treat with add-apt-repository -r

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 18:58











  • @sudodus I'm not very good with shellscripts. Could you write me one? here's the output of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. pastebin.com/MiiLHZYX

    – Farhood ET
    Apr 12 at 19:05











  • I don't say no, but I can't do it now. Let us hope that someone else has better time this weekend and can help you.

    – sudodus
    Apr 12 at 19:15







1




1





I don't know any general method, that can tell the difference between good and broken PPAs. But you can try sudo add-apt-repository -r ppa:whatever-you-want-to-remove for each PPA that you want to get rid of.

– sudodus
Apr 12 at 18:53






I don't know any general method, that can tell the difference between good and broken PPAs. But you can try sudo add-apt-repository -r ppa:whatever-you-want-to-remove for each PPA that you want to get rid of.

– sudodus
Apr 12 at 18:53














@sudodus PPAs that fail when calling apt-get update shall be a good indicator IMO.

– Farhood ET
Apr 12 at 18:56





@sudodus PPAs that fail when calling apt-get update shall be a good indicator IMO.

– Farhood ET
Apr 12 at 18:56













In that case you can use that information in a shellscript file in order to decide which PPAs to treat with add-apt-repository -r

– sudodus
Apr 12 at 18:58





In that case you can use that information in a shellscript file in order to decide which PPAs to treat with add-apt-repository -r

– sudodus
Apr 12 at 18:58













@sudodus I'm not very good with shellscripts. Could you write me one? here's the output of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. pastebin.com/MiiLHZYX

– Farhood ET
Apr 12 at 19:05





@sudodus I'm not very good with shellscripts. Could you write me one? here's the output of sudo apt-get update | grep Failed. pastebin.com/MiiLHZYX

– Farhood ET
Apr 12 at 19:05













I don't say no, but I can't do it now. Let us hope that someone else has better time this weekend and can help you.

– sudodus
Apr 12 at 19:15





I don't say no, but I can't do it now. Let us hope that someone else has better time this weekend and can help you.

– sudodus
Apr 12 at 19:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














We really don't discuss 19.04 until later this month when it's formally released. You caused these problems mostly by prematurely upgrading to a as yet unreleased version of Ubuntu.



However, to solve your problem...



is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list:50 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vivaldi.list:3


It tells you right there where the problem is. You have the same repository entered twice, once in sources.list line 50, and vivaldi.list line 3. View vivadi.list, and then edit sources.list and remove the duplicate entry on line 50.



The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/brightbox/ruby-ng/ubuntu disco Release' does not have a Release file.


Because you upgraded to 19.04 prematurely, some PPA's got updated to the disco release prematurely, and those don't exist yet. Edit each of these and use cosmic, or some older Ubuntu release. Easiest to do this in Software & Updates application.






share|improve this answer





























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    We really don't discuss 19.04 until later this month when it's formally released. You caused these problems mostly by prematurely upgrading to a as yet unreleased version of Ubuntu.



    However, to solve your problem...



    is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list:50 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vivaldi.list:3


    It tells you right there where the problem is. You have the same repository entered twice, once in sources.list line 50, and vivaldi.list line 3. View vivadi.list, and then edit sources.list and remove the duplicate entry on line 50.



    The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/brightbox/ruby-ng/ubuntu disco Release' does not have a Release file.


    Because you upgraded to 19.04 prematurely, some PPA's got updated to the disco release prematurely, and those don't exist yet. Edit each of these and use cosmic, or some older Ubuntu release. Easiest to do this in Software & Updates application.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      We really don't discuss 19.04 until later this month when it's formally released. You caused these problems mostly by prematurely upgrading to a as yet unreleased version of Ubuntu.



      However, to solve your problem...



      is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list:50 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vivaldi.list:3


      It tells you right there where the problem is. You have the same repository entered twice, once in sources.list line 50, and vivaldi.list line 3. View vivadi.list, and then edit sources.list and remove the duplicate entry on line 50.



      The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/brightbox/ruby-ng/ubuntu disco Release' does not have a Release file.


      Because you upgraded to 19.04 prematurely, some PPA's got updated to the disco release prematurely, and those don't exist yet. Edit each of these and use cosmic, or some older Ubuntu release. Easiest to do this in Software & Updates application.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        We really don't discuss 19.04 until later this month when it's formally released. You caused these problems mostly by prematurely upgrading to a as yet unreleased version of Ubuntu.



        However, to solve your problem...



        is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list:50 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vivaldi.list:3


        It tells you right there where the problem is. You have the same repository entered twice, once in sources.list line 50, and vivaldi.list line 3. View vivadi.list, and then edit sources.list and remove the duplicate entry on line 50.



        The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/brightbox/ruby-ng/ubuntu disco Release' does not have a Release file.


        Because you upgraded to 19.04 prematurely, some PPA's got updated to the disco release prematurely, and those don't exist yet. Edit each of these and use cosmic, or some older Ubuntu release. Easiest to do this in Software & Updates application.






        share|improve this answer













        We really don't discuss 19.04 until later this month when it's formally released. You caused these problems mostly by prematurely upgrading to a as yet unreleased version of Ubuntu.



        However, to solve your problem...



        is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list:50 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vivaldi.list:3


        It tells you right there where the problem is. You have the same repository entered twice, once in sources.list line 50, and vivaldi.list line 3. View vivadi.list, and then edit sources.list and remove the duplicate entry on line 50.



        The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/brightbox/ruby-ng/ubuntu disco Release' does not have a Release file.


        Because you upgraded to 19.04 prematurely, some PPA's got updated to the disco release prematurely, and those don't exist yet. Edit each of these and use cosmic, or some older Ubuntu release. Easiest to do this in Software & Updates application.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 13 at 13:09









        heynnemaheynnema

        21.6k32361




        21.6k32361













            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?