Libvirt network bridging issuesKVM Network Bridge to assign Static IPBridging: Loosing WLAN network connection with 4addr on option - Why?Bridging two networks: access to bridge slow and unreliable14.04 no internet connection when I up the bridge interface (for LXC container)How to assign static IP to KVM VM after bridging?bridging two wireless interfacesDisable hidden bridging between network interfacesEnable network bridging on Ubuntu serverUnable to bridge network to qemu (libvirt) guestbridging KVM on Ubuntu 18.04Bridging, bonding and netplan
Does the posterior necessarily follow the same conditional dependence structure as the prior?
Can White Castle?
Can you apprehend something instead of someone?
Was there ever a name for the weapons of the Others?
Why does passing to a function a set::iterator instead of a const_iterator violate the One Definition Rule?
If I wouldn't want to read the story, is writing it still a good idea?
How come I was asked by a CBP officer why I was in the US?
Can ADFS connect to other SSO services?
STM Microcontroller burns every time
Is it correct that dependent origination will cease to exist if one doesn't have 12 nidanas?
Trainee keeps missing deadlines for independent learning
Did Karl Marx ever use any example that involved cotton and dollars to illustrate the way capital and surplus value were generated?
Employer wants to use my work email account after I quit
Does Marvel have an equivalent of the Green Lantern?
Cascading Repair Costs following Blown Head Gasket on a 2004 Subaru Outback
Are there any efficient algorithms to solve the longest path problem in networks with cycles?
What are the penalties for overstaying in USA?
Suggested order for Amazon Prime Doctor Who series
Does squid ink pasta bleed?
Where do I get advice and guidance from in my PhD if my supervisor is not an expert in the field I am working on?
Should I tell my insurance company I'm making payments on my new car?
Has there been any indication at all that further negotiation between the UK and EU is possible?
Conjugating present and past negative i-adjectives
How to add multiple ip address in destination ip in acl rule
Libvirt network bridging issues
KVM Network Bridge to assign Static IPBridging: Loosing WLAN network connection with 4addr on option - Why?Bridging two networks: access to bridge slow and unreliable14.04 no internet connection when I up the bridge interface (for LXC container)How to assign static IP to KVM VM after bridging?bridging two wireless interfacesDisable hidden bridging between network interfacesEnable network bridging on Ubuntu serverUnable to bridge network to qemu (libvirt) guestbridging KVM on Ubuntu 18.04Bridging, bonding and netplan
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I want to set up a bridge so that guest VMs on my headless server use the LAN DHCP and not dnsmasq. I followed these instructions: https://jamielinux.com/docs/libvirt-networking-handbook/bridged-network.html#bridge-debian. Looking at the ifconfig
results, it seems to give me exactly what I was looking for:
br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.210 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::4216:7eff:fe63:7516 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 8255 bytes 653898 (653.8 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 633 bytes 60185 (60.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.195 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 42190 bytes 48646124 (48.6 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 3 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 9808 bytes 889965 (889.9 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:7a:ca:5e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
However, if I try to SSH into my server (192.168.1.195) from another machine (192.168.1.196), I can't connect. Pings from the server can't seem to reach other devices on my LAN, but pings from the server to 8.8.8.8 seem to work OK. My /etc/network/interfaces
file looks like the below (the MAC is my server's NIC):
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
# Use the MAC address identified above.
hwaddress ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16
address 192.168.1.210
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.1.1
bridge_ports enp3s0
# If you want to turn on Spanning Tree Protocol, ask your hosting
# provider first as it may conflict with their network.
bridge_stp on
# If STP is off, set to 0. If STP is on, set to 2 (or greater).
bridge_fd 0
I've spent the last two days googling, and re-imaged my server a couple of times as well when things got too broken, and I think I'm just losing the plot... My server is Ubuntu 18.04.2, completely stock other than the libvirt and ssh packages installed. How can I get the server to be reachable by my other network machines?
virtualization network-bridge
add a comment |
I want to set up a bridge so that guest VMs on my headless server use the LAN DHCP and not dnsmasq. I followed these instructions: https://jamielinux.com/docs/libvirt-networking-handbook/bridged-network.html#bridge-debian. Looking at the ifconfig
results, it seems to give me exactly what I was looking for:
br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.210 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::4216:7eff:fe63:7516 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 8255 bytes 653898 (653.8 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 633 bytes 60185 (60.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.195 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 42190 bytes 48646124 (48.6 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 3 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 9808 bytes 889965 (889.9 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:7a:ca:5e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
However, if I try to SSH into my server (192.168.1.195) from another machine (192.168.1.196), I can't connect. Pings from the server can't seem to reach other devices on my LAN, but pings from the server to 8.8.8.8 seem to work OK. My /etc/network/interfaces
file looks like the below (the MAC is my server's NIC):
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
# Use the MAC address identified above.
hwaddress ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16
address 192.168.1.210
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.1.1
bridge_ports enp3s0
# If you want to turn on Spanning Tree Protocol, ask your hosting
# provider first as it may conflict with their network.
bridge_stp on
# If STP is off, set to 0. If STP is on, set to 2 (or greater).
bridge_fd 0
I've spent the last two days googling, and re-imaged my server a couple of times as well when things got too broken, and I think I'm just losing the plot... My server is Ubuntu 18.04.2, completely stock other than the libvirt and ssh packages installed. How can I get the server to be reachable by my other network machines?
virtualization network-bridge
What happens if you try to ssh to the bridge address? 192.168.1.210 in your case. Once the enp3s0 port is bound to the bridge it shouldn't have/need its own address unless you're doing something like configuring sub-interfaces.
– RobertRSeattle
Apr 15 at 2:12
did you modify your vm definitions to use the bridge? See step 2, here.
– Doug Smythies
Apr 15 at 16:20
Thanks for the quick replies, guys! Yes, I can access 192.168.1.210 from my Windows machine using Putty. Sorry - I should have checked before posting. HOWEVER, I've lost access to filesharing (mapped network drive no longer works), and apps running on the server have problems getting to the internet. About ready to throw this thing out the window :)
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:21
I'm still trying to get to a point where my server sits on 192.168.1.195 and my VM guest is on the same subnet, say 192.168.1.210. And where both the server and the VM are visible to my Windows machine 192.168.1.196. Have run out of hair to pull out.
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:36
add a comment |
I want to set up a bridge so that guest VMs on my headless server use the LAN DHCP and not dnsmasq. I followed these instructions: https://jamielinux.com/docs/libvirt-networking-handbook/bridged-network.html#bridge-debian. Looking at the ifconfig
results, it seems to give me exactly what I was looking for:
br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.210 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::4216:7eff:fe63:7516 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 8255 bytes 653898 (653.8 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 633 bytes 60185 (60.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.195 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 42190 bytes 48646124 (48.6 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 3 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 9808 bytes 889965 (889.9 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:7a:ca:5e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
However, if I try to SSH into my server (192.168.1.195) from another machine (192.168.1.196), I can't connect. Pings from the server can't seem to reach other devices on my LAN, but pings from the server to 8.8.8.8 seem to work OK. My /etc/network/interfaces
file looks like the below (the MAC is my server's NIC):
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
# Use the MAC address identified above.
hwaddress ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16
address 192.168.1.210
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.1.1
bridge_ports enp3s0
# If you want to turn on Spanning Tree Protocol, ask your hosting
# provider first as it may conflict with their network.
bridge_stp on
# If STP is off, set to 0. If STP is on, set to 2 (or greater).
bridge_fd 0
I've spent the last two days googling, and re-imaged my server a couple of times as well when things got too broken, and I think I'm just losing the plot... My server is Ubuntu 18.04.2, completely stock other than the libvirt and ssh packages installed. How can I get the server to be reachable by my other network machines?
virtualization network-bridge
I want to set up a bridge so that guest VMs on my headless server use the LAN DHCP and not dnsmasq. I followed these instructions: https://jamielinux.com/docs/libvirt-networking-handbook/bridged-network.html#bridge-debian. Looking at the ifconfig
results, it seems to give me exactly what I was looking for:
br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.210 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::4216:7eff:fe63:7516 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 8255 bytes 653898 (653.8 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 633 bytes 60185 (60.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.195 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 42190 bytes 48646124 (48.6 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 3 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 9808 bytes 889965 (889.9 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 2215 bytes 510180 (510.1 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:7a:ca:5e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
However, if I try to SSH into my server (192.168.1.195) from another machine (192.168.1.196), I can't connect. Pings from the server can't seem to reach other devices on my LAN, but pings from the server to 8.8.8.8 seem to work OK. My /etc/network/interfaces
file looks like the below (the MAC is my server's NIC):
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
# Use the MAC address identified above.
hwaddress ether 40:16:7e:63:75:16
address 192.168.1.210
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.1.1
bridge_ports enp3s0
# If you want to turn on Spanning Tree Protocol, ask your hosting
# provider first as it may conflict with their network.
bridge_stp on
# If STP is off, set to 0. If STP is on, set to 2 (or greater).
bridge_fd 0
I've spent the last two days googling, and re-imaged my server a couple of times as well when things got too broken, and I think I'm just losing the plot... My server is Ubuntu 18.04.2, completely stock other than the libvirt and ssh packages installed. How can I get the server to be reachable by my other network machines?
virtualization network-bridge
virtualization network-bridge
asked Apr 15 at 1:19
Adam MacAdam Mac
214 bronze badges
214 bronze badges
What happens if you try to ssh to the bridge address? 192.168.1.210 in your case. Once the enp3s0 port is bound to the bridge it shouldn't have/need its own address unless you're doing something like configuring sub-interfaces.
– RobertRSeattle
Apr 15 at 2:12
did you modify your vm definitions to use the bridge? See step 2, here.
– Doug Smythies
Apr 15 at 16:20
Thanks for the quick replies, guys! Yes, I can access 192.168.1.210 from my Windows machine using Putty. Sorry - I should have checked before posting. HOWEVER, I've lost access to filesharing (mapped network drive no longer works), and apps running on the server have problems getting to the internet. About ready to throw this thing out the window :)
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:21
I'm still trying to get to a point where my server sits on 192.168.1.195 and my VM guest is on the same subnet, say 192.168.1.210. And where both the server and the VM are visible to my Windows machine 192.168.1.196. Have run out of hair to pull out.
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:36
add a comment |
What happens if you try to ssh to the bridge address? 192.168.1.210 in your case. Once the enp3s0 port is bound to the bridge it shouldn't have/need its own address unless you're doing something like configuring sub-interfaces.
– RobertRSeattle
Apr 15 at 2:12
did you modify your vm definitions to use the bridge? See step 2, here.
– Doug Smythies
Apr 15 at 16:20
Thanks for the quick replies, guys! Yes, I can access 192.168.1.210 from my Windows machine using Putty. Sorry - I should have checked before posting. HOWEVER, I've lost access to filesharing (mapped network drive no longer works), and apps running on the server have problems getting to the internet. About ready to throw this thing out the window :)
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:21
I'm still trying to get to a point where my server sits on 192.168.1.195 and my VM guest is on the same subnet, say 192.168.1.210. And where both the server and the VM are visible to my Windows machine 192.168.1.196. Have run out of hair to pull out.
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:36
What happens if you try to ssh to the bridge address? 192.168.1.210 in your case. Once the enp3s0 port is bound to the bridge it shouldn't have/need its own address unless you're doing something like configuring sub-interfaces.
– RobertRSeattle
Apr 15 at 2:12
What happens if you try to ssh to the bridge address? 192.168.1.210 in your case. Once the enp3s0 port is bound to the bridge it shouldn't have/need its own address unless you're doing something like configuring sub-interfaces.
– RobertRSeattle
Apr 15 at 2:12
did you modify your vm definitions to use the bridge? See step 2, here.
– Doug Smythies
Apr 15 at 16:20
did you modify your vm definitions to use the bridge? See step 2, here.
– Doug Smythies
Apr 15 at 16:20
Thanks for the quick replies, guys! Yes, I can access 192.168.1.210 from my Windows machine using Putty. Sorry - I should have checked before posting. HOWEVER, I've lost access to filesharing (mapped network drive no longer works), and apps running on the server have problems getting to the internet. About ready to throw this thing out the window :)
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:21
Thanks for the quick replies, guys! Yes, I can access 192.168.1.210 from my Windows machine using Putty. Sorry - I should have checked before posting. HOWEVER, I've lost access to filesharing (mapped network drive no longer works), and apps running on the server have problems getting to the internet. About ready to throw this thing out the window :)
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:21
I'm still trying to get to a point where my server sits on 192.168.1.195 and my VM guest is on the same subnet, say 192.168.1.210. And where both the server and the VM are visible to my Windows machine 192.168.1.196. Have run out of hair to pull out.
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:36
I'm still trying to get to a point where my server sits on 192.168.1.195 and my VM guest is on the same subnet, say 192.168.1.210. And where both the server and the VM are visible to my Windows machine 192.168.1.196. Have run out of hair to pull out.
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Sometimes it pays to just leave things alone for a day or two and not look at them. Then come back to it fresh. In the end, setting up a bridge seemed to be fairly straightforward, with the following two steps:
- Update /etc/sysctl.conf
Uncomment the line that says ".net.ipv4.ip_forward=1"
- Update /etc/network/interfaces
For me, this was the entirety of the file. If you have more interfaces, you may want to adjust accordingly. enp3s0 was the ID of my physical interface.
# ifupdown has been replaced by netplan(5) on this system. See
# /etc/netplan for current configuration.
# To re-enable ifupdown on this system, you can run:
# sudo apt install ifupdown
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports enp3s0
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
bridge_maxwait 0
I used an IP address reservation in my router to make sure my VM always got the same IP address. Using DHCP made configuration overall a bit easier for me.
Thanks again to RobertRSeattle and Doug Smythies for putting up with me.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1133933%2flibvirt-network-bridging-issues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sometimes it pays to just leave things alone for a day or two and not look at them. Then come back to it fresh. In the end, setting up a bridge seemed to be fairly straightforward, with the following two steps:
- Update /etc/sysctl.conf
Uncomment the line that says ".net.ipv4.ip_forward=1"
- Update /etc/network/interfaces
For me, this was the entirety of the file. If you have more interfaces, you may want to adjust accordingly. enp3s0 was the ID of my physical interface.
# ifupdown has been replaced by netplan(5) on this system. See
# /etc/netplan for current configuration.
# To re-enable ifupdown on this system, you can run:
# sudo apt install ifupdown
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports enp3s0
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
bridge_maxwait 0
I used an IP address reservation in my router to make sure my VM always got the same IP address. Using DHCP made configuration overall a bit easier for me.
Thanks again to RobertRSeattle and Doug Smythies for putting up with me.
add a comment |
Sometimes it pays to just leave things alone for a day or two and not look at them. Then come back to it fresh. In the end, setting up a bridge seemed to be fairly straightforward, with the following two steps:
- Update /etc/sysctl.conf
Uncomment the line that says ".net.ipv4.ip_forward=1"
- Update /etc/network/interfaces
For me, this was the entirety of the file. If you have more interfaces, you may want to adjust accordingly. enp3s0 was the ID of my physical interface.
# ifupdown has been replaced by netplan(5) on this system. See
# /etc/netplan for current configuration.
# To re-enable ifupdown on this system, you can run:
# sudo apt install ifupdown
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports enp3s0
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
bridge_maxwait 0
I used an IP address reservation in my router to make sure my VM always got the same IP address. Using DHCP made configuration overall a bit easier for me.
Thanks again to RobertRSeattle and Doug Smythies for putting up with me.
add a comment |
Sometimes it pays to just leave things alone for a day or two and not look at them. Then come back to it fresh. In the end, setting up a bridge seemed to be fairly straightforward, with the following two steps:
- Update /etc/sysctl.conf
Uncomment the line that says ".net.ipv4.ip_forward=1"
- Update /etc/network/interfaces
For me, this was the entirety of the file. If you have more interfaces, you may want to adjust accordingly. enp3s0 was the ID of my physical interface.
# ifupdown has been replaced by netplan(5) on this system. See
# /etc/netplan for current configuration.
# To re-enable ifupdown on this system, you can run:
# sudo apt install ifupdown
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports enp3s0
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
bridge_maxwait 0
I used an IP address reservation in my router to make sure my VM always got the same IP address. Using DHCP made configuration overall a bit easier for me.
Thanks again to RobertRSeattle and Doug Smythies for putting up with me.
Sometimes it pays to just leave things alone for a day or two and not look at them. Then come back to it fresh. In the end, setting up a bridge seemed to be fairly straightforward, with the following two steps:
- Update /etc/sysctl.conf
Uncomment the line that says ".net.ipv4.ip_forward=1"
- Update /etc/network/interfaces
For me, this was the entirety of the file. If you have more interfaces, you may want to adjust accordingly. enp3s0 was the ID of my physical interface.
# ifupdown has been replaced by netplan(5) on this system. See
# /etc/netplan for current configuration.
# To re-enable ifupdown on this system, you can run:
# sudo apt install ifupdown
iface enp3s0 inet manual
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports enp3s0
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
bridge_maxwait 0
I used an IP address reservation in my router to make sure my VM always got the same IP address. Using DHCP made configuration overall a bit easier for me.
Thanks again to RobertRSeattle and Doug Smythies for putting up with me.
answered Apr 16 at 16:47
Adam MacAdam Mac
214 bronze badges
214 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1133933%2flibvirt-network-bridging-issues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What happens if you try to ssh to the bridge address? 192.168.1.210 in your case. Once the enp3s0 port is bound to the bridge it shouldn't have/need its own address unless you're doing something like configuring sub-interfaces.
– RobertRSeattle
Apr 15 at 2:12
did you modify your vm definitions to use the bridge? See step 2, here.
– Doug Smythies
Apr 15 at 16:20
Thanks for the quick replies, guys! Yes, I can access 192.168.1.210 from my Windows machine using Putty. Sorry - I should have checked before posting. HOWEVER, I've lost access to filesharing (mapped network drive no longer works), and apps running on the server have problems getting to the internet. About ready to throw this thing out the window :)
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:21
I'm still trying to get to a point where my server sits on 192.168.1.195 and my VM guest is on the same subnet, say 192.168.1.210. And where both the server and the VM are visible to my Windows machine 192.168.1.196. Have run out of hair to pull out.
– Adam Mac
Apr 16 at 0:36