Create a list of all possible Boolean configurations of three constraintsImplementing a function which generalizes the merging step in merge sortList all possible elements of a setMatlab-style Find in Mathematica? Value list and Boolean List, how to select values according to the boolean list?How to combine all possible N boolean values?Create lists for all nested lists, all nested list lengthsList all possible license plate numbersFind positions of certain value in a big boolean listHow to test all possible input for a logic function?

Is it safe to pay bills over satellite internet?

Uniform Roe algebra of virtually abelian group is type I C*-algebra?

Can you use a virtual credit card to withdraw money from an ATM in the UK?

Why is my paper "under review" if it contains no results?

Does Darwin owe a debt to Hegel?

Why do we need the coupling small when doing perturbative QFT calculation?

Does a restocking fee still qualify as a business expense?

How are Aircraft Noses Designed?

What could possibly power an Alcubierre drive?

How to increment the value of a (decimal) variable (with leading zero) by +1?

90's/00's anime about 3 girls who travel between the real world and a fantasy world

How to deal with people whose priority is to not get blamed?

What is the gold linker?

Car as a good investment

Does the US require a House vote to begin an impeachment inquiry?

Can a Pokemon that I tried to capture from field research run away?

How does a ball bearing door hinge work?

Does cover affect melee attacks?

Easy way of generating a 50-150W load @12V

When to use the gestalt principle of common region?

Can Chandra, Acolyte of Flame cast Heartfire without the additional cost?

Why is technology bad for children?

How to treat unhandled exceptions? (Terminate the application vs. Keep it alive)

First author doesn't want a co-author to read the whole paper



Create a list of all possible Boolean configurations of three constraints


Implementing a function which generalizes the merging step in merge sortList all possible elements of a setMatlab-style Find in Mathematica? Value list and Boolean List, how to select values according to the boolean list?How to combine all possible N boolean values?Create lists for all nested lists, all nested list lengthsList all possible license plate numbersFind positions of certain value in a big boolean listHow to test all possible input for a logic function?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








3














$begingroup$


I have three nonnegativity constraints
beginequation
A_1>0, A_2>0, A_3>0.
endequation

I want to create a single List consisting of all possible/inequivalent Boolean configurations of none (trivial), one (also trivial), two, and three of them, using the AND, NOT and OR operations.



How long will this List be?



Well--in response to the initial comment/answer--I was really thinking of a (multi-element) List such as






Given such a List, I would make the substitutions



B1 -> A1 > 0, B2 -> A2 > 0, B3 -> A3 > 0


and then attempt Boolean integrations using Boole[each element of the resulting list].










share|improve this question












$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Are there any equivalent pairs in this list? res = And @@ MapThread[Construct, #, a, b, c] & /@ Tuples[Not, Identity, 3]; res = Join[res, Not /@ res];
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    May 11 at 13:40

















3














$begingroup$


I have three nonnegativity constraints
beginequation
A_1>0, A_2>0, A_3>0.
endequation

I want to create a single List consisting of all possible/inequivalent Boolean configurations of none (trivial), one (also trivial), two, and three of them, using the AND, NOT and OR operations.



How long will this List be?



Well--in response to the initial comment/answer--I was really thinking of a (multi-element) List such as






Given such a List, I would make the substitutions



B1 -> A1 > 0, B2 -> A2 > 0, B3 -> A3 > 0


and then attempt Boolean integrations using Boole[each element of the resulting list].










share|improve this question












$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Are there any equivalent pairs in this list? res = And @@ MapThread[Construct, #, a, b, c] & /@ Tuples[Not, Identity, 3]; res = Join[res, Not /@ res];
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    May 11 at 13:40













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have three nonnegativity constraints
beginequation
A_1>0, A_2>0, A_3>0.
endequation

I want to create a single List consisting of all possible/inequivalent Boolean configurations of none (trivial), one (also trivial), two, and three of them, using the AND, NOT and OR operations.



How long will this List be?



Well--in response to the initial comment/answer--I was really thinking of a (multi-element) List such as






Given such a List, I would make the substitutions



B1 -> A1 > 0, B2 -> A2 > 0, B3 -> A3 > 0


and then attempt Boolean integrations using Boole[each element of the resulting list].










share|improve this question












$endgroup$




I have three nonnegativity constraints
beginequation
A_1>0, A_2>0, A_3>0.
endequation

I want to create a single List consisting of all possible/inequivalent Boolean configurations of none (trivial), one (also trivial), two, and three of them, using the AND, NOT and OR operations.



How long will this List be?



Well--in response to the initial comment/answer--I was really thinking of a (multi-element) List such as






Given such a List, I would make the substitutions



B1 -> A1 > 0, B2 -> A2 > 0, B3 -> A3 > 0


and then attempt Boolean integrations using Boole[each element of the resulting list].







list-manipulation boolean-computation






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 11 at 15:24







Paul B. Slater

















asked May 11 at 13:09









Paul B. SlaterPaul B. Slater

7934 silver badges14 bronze badges




7934 silver badges14 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Are there any equivalent pairs in this list? res = And @@ MapThread[Construct, #, a, b, c] & /@ Tuples[Not, Identity, 3]; res = Join[res, Not /@ res];
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    May 11 at 13:40
















  • $begingroup$
    Are there any equivalent pairs in this list? res = And @@ MapThread[Construct, #, a, b, c] & /@ Tuples[Not, Identity, 3]; res = Join[res, Not /@ res];
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    May 11 at 13:40















$begingroup$
Are there any equivalent pairs in this list? res = And @@ MapThread[Construct, #, a, b, c] & /@ Tuples[Not, Identity, 3]; res = Join[res, Not /@ res];
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 11 at 13:40




$begingroup$
Are there any equivalent pairs in this list? res = And @@ MapThread[Construct, #, a, b, c] & /@ Tuples[Not, Identity, 3]; res = Join[res, Not /@ res];
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 11 at 13:40










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5
















$begingroup$

You can use BooleanCountingFunction:



exp = Array[Subscript[A, #] > 0 &, 3];
BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[1, 3] @@ exp]

TeXForm @ %



$smallleft(A_1leq 0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3leq 0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land
A_3leq 0right)$




BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[2, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



$small left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3leq
0right)$




BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[3, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



$small A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3>0$







share|improve this answer












$endgroup$






















    3
















    $begingroup$

    You can create a list of all 8 possible combinations:



    tups = Tuples[And[B1, !B1, B2, !B2, B3, !B3]]



    B1 && B2 && B3, B1 && B2 && ! B3, B1 && ! B2 && B3,
    B1 && ! B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && B2 && B3, ! B1 && B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && ! B2 &&
    B3, ! B1 && ! B2 && ! B3




    Then, I think you want the power set:



    sets = BooleanMinimize /@ Subsets[Or @@ tups];
    sets[[;;20]]



    (B1 && ! B2 && ! B3),
    B2 && B3, (B1 && B2 && B3)




    You examples are all included:



    examples = ! (B2 && B3),
    ! B1 && B2 && B3
    ;
    MemberQ[sets, #]& /@ BooleanMinimize /@ examples



    True, True, True, True, True, True







    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Thanks! I don't think I was considering more than 3 member combinations (hard enough to integrate with them as constraints)--but some of those (at most three) member combinations would have OR's in them--such as B1 || (B2 && B3). I don't see that standing by itself in your list (or any other two- or three-member group with an imbedded OR). Why is its presence tested as TRUE? Not sure as to the conversion rules of Boolean operations--can parentheses be removed? That's why I posted the question--to try to efficiently list all three-member distinct possibilities for my integration computations.
      $endgroup$
      – Paul B. Slater
      May 11 at 22:55











    • $begingroup$
      @PaulB.Slater I only showed the first 20 of the 256 elements of the power set. I don't understnad your criteria for what elements of the power set you want to consider.
      $endgroup$
      – Carl Woll
      May 11 at 23:02










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks again! I do now see the full 256 entries. How can I select those among them with n B's in them (n=2, 3, 4,...)? That seem like a resonable order in which to attempt my constrained integrations.
      $endgroup$
      – Paul B. Slater
      May 11 at 23:40













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198169%2fcreate-a-list-of-all-possible-boolean-configurations-of-three-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5
















    $begingroup$

    You can use BooleanCountingFunction:



    exp = Array[Subscript[A, #] > 0 &, 3];
    BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[1, 3] @@ exp]

    TeXForm @ %



    $smallleft(A_1leq 0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3leq 0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land
    A_3leq 0right)$




    BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[2, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



    $small left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3leq
    0right)$




    BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[3, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



    $small A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3>0$







    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$



















      5
















      $begingroup$

      You can use BooleanCountingFunction:



      exp = Array[Subscript[A, #] > 0 &, 3];
      BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[1, 3] @@ exp]

      TeXForm @ %



      $smallleft(A_1leq 0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3leq 0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land
      A_3leq 0right)$




      BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[2, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



      $small left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3leq
      0right)$




      BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[3, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



      $small A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3>0$







      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$

















        5














        5










        5







        $begingroup$

        You can use BooleanCountingFunction:



        exp = Array[Subscript[A, #] > 0 &, 3];
        BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[1, 3] @@ exp]

        TeXForm @ %



        $smallleft(A_1leq 0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3leq 0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land
        A_3leq 0right)$




        BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[2, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



        $small left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3leq
        0right)$




        BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[3, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



        $small A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3>0$







        share|improve this answer












        $endgroup$



        You can use BooleanCountingFunction:



        exp = Array[Subscript[A, #] > 0 &, 3];
        BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[1, 3] @@ exp]

        TeXForm @ %



        $smallleft(A_1leq 0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3leq 0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land
        A_3leq 0right)$




        BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[2, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



        $small left(A_1leq 0land A_2>0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2leq 0land A_3>0right)lor left(A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3leq
        0right)$




        BooleanConvert[BooleanCountingFunction[3, 3] @@ exp] // TeXForm



        $small A_1>0land A_2>0land A_3>0$








        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited May 11 at 13:48

























        answered May 11 at 13:40









        kglrkglr

        220k10 gold badges250 silver badges507 bronze badges




        220k10 gold badges250 silver badges507 bronze badges


























            3
















            $begingroup$

            You can create a list of all 8 possible combinations:



            tups = Tuples[And[B1, !B1, B2, !B2, B3, !B3]]



            B1 && B2 && B3, B1 && B2 && ! B3, B1 && ! B2 && B3,
            B1 && ! B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && B2 && B3, ! B1 && B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && ! B2 &&
            B3, ! B1 && ! B2 && ! B3




            Then, I think you want the power set:



            sets = BooleanMinimize /@ Subsets[Or @@ tups];
            sets[[;;20]]



            (B1 && ! B2 && ! B3),
            B2 && B3, (B1 && B2 && B3)




            You examples are all included:



            examples = ! (B2 && B3),
            ! B1 && B2 && B3
            ;
            MemberQ[sets, #]& /@ BooleanMinimize /@ examples



            True, True, True, True, True, True







            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I don't think I was considering more than 3 member combinations (hard enough to integrate with them as constraints)--but some of those (at most three) member combinations would have OR's in them--such as B1 || (B2 && B3). I don't see that standing by itself in your list (or any other two- or three-member group with an imbedded OR). Why is its presence tested as TRUE? Not sure as to the conversion rules of Boolean operations--can parentheses be removed? That's why I posted the question--to try to efficiently list all three-member distinct possibilities for my integration computations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 22:55











            • $begingroup$
              @PaulB.Slater I only showed the first 20 of the 256 elements of the power set. I don't understnad your criteria for what elements of the power set you want to consider.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Woll
              May 11 at 23:02










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks again! I do now see the full 256 entries. How can I select those among them with n B's in them (n=2, 3, 4,...)? That seem like a resonable order in which to attempt my constrained integrations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 23:40
















            3
















            $begingroup$

            You can create a list of all 8 possible combinations:



            tups = Tuples[And[B1, !B1, B2, !B2, B3, !B3]]



            B1 && B2 && B3, B1 && B2 && ! B3, B1 && ! B2 && B3,
            B1 && ! B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && B2 && B3, ! B1 && B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && ! B2 &&
            B3, ! B1 && ! B2 && ! B3




            Then, I think you want the power set:



            sets = BooleanMinimize /@ Subsets[Or @@ tups];
            sets[[;;20]]



            (B1 && ! B2 && ! B3),
            B2 && B3, (B1 && B2 && B3)




            You examples are all included:



            examples = ! (B2 && B3),
            ! B1 && B2 && B3
            ;
            MemberQ[sets, #]& /@ BooleanMinimize /@ examples



            True, True, True, True, True, True







            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I don't think I was considering more than 3 member combinations (hard enough to integrate with them as constraints)--but some of those (at most three) member combinations would have OR's in them--such as B1 || (B2 && B3). I don't see that standing by itself in your list (or any other two- or three-member group with an imbedded OR). Why is its presence tested as TRUE? Not sure as to the conversion rules of Boolean operations--can parentheses be removed? That's why I posted the question--to try to efficiently list all three-member distinct possibilities for my integration computations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 22:55











            • $begingroup$
              @PaulB.Slater I only showed the first 20 of the 256 elements of the power set. I don't understnad your criteria for what elements of the power set you want to consider.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Woll
              May 11 at 23:02










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks again! I do now see the full 256 entries. How can I select those among them with n B's in them (n=2, 3, 4,...)? That seem like a resonable order in which to attempt my constrained integrations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 23:40














            3














            3










            3







            $begingroup$

            You can create a list of all 8 possible combinations:



            tups = Tuples[And[B1, !B1, B2, !B2, B3, !B3]]



            B1 && B2 && B3, B1 && B2 && ! B3, B1 && ! B2 && B3,
            B1 && ! B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && B2 && B3, ! B1 && B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && ! B2 &&
            B3, ! B1 && ! B2 && ! B3




            Then, I think you want the power set:



            sets = BooleanMinimize /@ Subsets[Or @@ tups];
            sets[[;;20]]



            (B1 && ! B2 && ! B3),
            B2 && B3, (B1 && B2 && B3)




            You examples are all included:



            examples = ! (B2 && B3),
            ! B1 && B2 && B3
            ;
            MemberQ[sets, #]& /@ BooleanMinimize /@ examples



            True, True, True, True, True, True







            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



            You can create a list of all 8 possible combinations:



            tups = Tuples[And[B1, !B1, B2, !B2, B3, !B3]]



            B1 && B2 && B3, B1 && B2 && ! B3, B1 && ! B2 && B3,
            B1 && ! B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && B2 && B3, ! B1 && B2 && ! B3, ! B1 && ! B2 &&
            B3, ! B1 && ! B2 && ! B3




            Then, I think you want the power set:



            sets = BooleanMinimize /@ Subsets[Or @@ tups];
            sets[[;;20]]



            (B1 && ! B2 && ! B3),
            B2 && B3, (B1 && B2 && B3)




            You examples are all included:



            examples = ! (B2 && B3),
            ! B1 && B2 && B3
            ;
            MemberQ[sets, #]& /@ BooleanMinimize /@ examples



            True, True, True, True, True, True








            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer










            answered May 11 at 18:54









            Carl WollCarl Woll

            92.1k3 gold badges121 silver badges233 bronze badges




            92.1k3 gold badges121 silver badges233 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I don't think I was considering more than 3 member combinations (hard enough to integrate with them as constraints)--but some of those (at most three) member combinations would have OR's in them--such as B1 || (B2 && B3). I don't see that standing by itself in your list (or any other two- or three-member group with an imbedded OR). Why is its presence tested as TRUE? Not sure as to the conversion rules of Boolean operations--can parentheses be removed? That's why I posted the question--to try to efficiently list all three-member distinct possibilities for my integration computations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 22:55











            • $begingroup$
              @PaulB.Slater I only showed the first 20 of the 256 elements of the power set. I don't understnad your criteria for what elements of the power set you want to consider.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Woll
              May 11 at 23:02










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks again! I do now see the full 256 entries. How can I select those among them with n B's in them (n=2, 3, 4,...)? That seem like a resonable order in which to attempt my constrained integrations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 23:40

















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I don't think I was considering more than 3 member combinations (hard enough to integrate with them as constraints)--but some of those (at most three) member combinations would have OR's in them--such as B1 || (B2 && B3). I don't see that standing by itself in your list (or any other two- or three-member group with an imbedded OR). Why is its presence tested as TRUE? Not sure as to the conversion rules of Boolean operations--can parentheses be removed? That's why I posted the question--to try to efficiently list all three-member distinct possibilities for my integration computations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 22:55











            • $begingroup$
              @PaulB.Slater I only showed the first 20 of the 256 elements of the power set. I don't understnad your criteria for what elements of the power set you want to consider.
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Woll
              May 11 at 23:02










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks again! I do now see the full 256 entries. How can I select those among them with n B's in them (n=2, 3, 4,...)? That seem like a resonable order in which to attempt my constrained integrations.
              $endgroup$
              – Paul B. Slater
              May 11 at 23:40
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks! I don't think I was considering more than 3 member combinations (hard enough to integrate with them as constraints)--but some of those (at most three) member combinations would have OR's in them--such as B1 || (B2 && B3). I don't see that standing by itself in your list (or any other two- or three-member group with an imbedded OR). Why is its presence tested as TRUE? Not sure as to the conversion rules of Boolean operations--can parentheses be removed? That's why I posted the question--to try to efficiently list all three-member distinct possibilities for my integration computations.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul B. Slater
            May 11 at 22:55





            $begingroup$
            Thanks! I don't think I was considering more than 3 member combinations (hard enough to integrate with them as constraints)--but some of those (at most three) member combinations would have OR's in them--such as B1 || (B2 && B3). I don't see that standing by itself in your list (or any other two- or three-member group with an imbedded OR). Why is its presence tested as TRUE? Not sure as to the conversion rules of Boolean operations--can parentheses be removed? That's why I posted the question--to try to efficiently list all three-member distinct possibilities for my integration computations.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul B. Slater
            May 11 at 22:55













            $begingroup$
            @PaulB.Slater I only showed the first 20 of the 256 elements of the power set. I don't understnad your criteria for what elements of the power set you want to consider.
            $endgroup$
            – Carl Woll
            May 11 at 23:02




            $begingroup$
            @PaulB.Slater I only showed the first 20 of the 256 elements of the power set. I don't understnad your criteria for what elements of the power set you want to consider.
            $endgroup$
            – Carl Woll
            May 11 at 23:02












            $begingroup$
            Thanks again! I do now see the full 256 entries. How can I select those among them with n B's in them (n=2, 3, 4,...)? That seem like a resonable order in which to attempt my constrained integrations.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul B. Slater
            May 11 at 23:40





            $begingroup$
            Thanks again! I do now see the full 256 entries. How can I select those among them with n B's in them (n=2, 3, 4,...)? That seem like a resonable order in which to attempt my constrained integrations.
            $endgroup$
            – Paul B. Slater
            May 11 at 23:40



















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198169%2fcreate-a-list-of-all-possible-boolean-configurations-of-three-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

            How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

            Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü