Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?How does the plan in the final battle solve the problem of Thanos?Why didn't Thanos make an attempt to steal the Aether?Avengers: why doesn't Ultron make backups?In The Avengers (2012), How did they communicate at the climax without any ear device even though the inner ear technology was created in 2013?Was Titan II always unguarded?How fast can Captain Marvel travel in Endgame?Why did the Sanctuary II focus its attack on Captain Marvel?Why weren't the Avengers surprised to see Thanos?

Interaction between casting spells and the Attack action

How do I count the number of elements in a list which are between two determined values?

First author doesn't want a co-author to read the whole paper

Code Golf Measurer © 2019

Is it safe to pay bills over satellite internet?

How does an alien race from a dying world annihilate most of humanity to colonize the planet for themselves?

Milk instead of water in bread

What's that funny "illo" I keep hearing in Southern Spain?

Drawing a sequence of circles

When to use the gestalt principle of common region?

Trade a bishop in the opening

Charges from Dollar General have never shown up on my debit card. How can I resolve this?

Can you use a virtual credit card to withdraw money from an ATM in the UK?

Does cover affect melee attacks?

Which CentOS 7 package provides the "boot" manpage?

Does Darwin owe a debt to Hegel?

How do I get my boyfriend to remove pictures of his ex girlfriend hanging in his apartment?

Why is my paper "under review" if it contains no results?

If we should encrypt the message rather than the method of transfer, why do we care about wifi security? Is this just security theatre?

Does any politician honestly want a No Deal Brexit?

How can I communicate feelings to players without impacting their agency?

Could an American state survive nuclear war?

Can we not simply connect a battery to a RAM to prevent data loss during power cuts?

How do I remove 'None' items from the end of a list in Python



Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?


How does the plan in the final battle solve the problem of Thanos?Why didn't Thanos make an attempt to steal the Aether?Avengers: why doesn't Ultron make backups?In The Avengers (2012), How did they communicate at the climax without any ear device even though the inner ear technology was created in 2013?Was Titan II always unguarded?How fast can Captain Marvel travel in Endgame?Why did the Sanctuary II focus its attack on Captain Marvel?Why weren't the Avengers surprised to see Thanos?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









20

















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question
























  • 9





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 14





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 12





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29

















20

















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question
























  • 9





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 14





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 12





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29













20












20








20








In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question

















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?







marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 13 at 19:35









Voldemort's Wrath

3,3253 gold badges11 silver badges54 bronze badges




3,3253 gold badges11 silver badges54 bronze badges










asked May 13 at 3:23









chessprogrammerchessprogrammer

2121 gold badge1 silver badge5 bronze badges




2121 gold badge1 silver badge5 bronze badges










  • 9





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 14





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 12





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29












  • 9





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 14





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 12





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29







9




9





We don't trade lives.

– gowenfawr
May 13 at 3:28





We don't trade lives.

– gowenfawr
May 13 at 3:28




13




13





Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

– chessprogrammer
May 13 at 3:29





Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

– chessprogrammer
May 13 at 3:29




14




14





There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

– user
May 13 at 10:52





There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

– user
May 13 at 10:52




12




12





@user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

– TheLethalCarrot
May 13 at 13:00





@user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

– TheLethalCarrot
May 13 at 13:00




3




3





@TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

– user
May 13 at 13:29





@TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

– user
May 13 at 13:29










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















27


















It didn't fit



The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



It didn't occur to them



It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



They didn't know that they could



Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






share|improve this answer























  • 10





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    May 13 at 4:45






  • 2





    I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    May 13 at 16:39


















60


















Because that was never the plan



The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



Avengers: Endgame







share|improve this answer























  • 13





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    May 13 at 12:44











  • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    May 13 at 22:35











  • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 14 at 6:16


















22


















Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



  • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


  • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


  • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


  • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






share|improve this answer























  • 16





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    May 13 at 7:38











  • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    May 13 at 8:23






  • 13





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    May 13 at 10:47






  • 2





    @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    May 13 at 13:58






  • 1





    You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:44


















9



















Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 14:32











  • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 15:05






  • 3





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:18






  • 1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 20:21






  • 2





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:29


















1


















Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






share|improve this answer




























  • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:46











  • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

    – Christopher Vella
    May 16 at 13:49


















0


















Because it would kill them



This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






share|improve this answer





























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212300%2fwhy-didnt-the-avengers-use-this-object-earlier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    27


















    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






    share|improve this answer























    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39















    27


















    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






    share|improve this answer























    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39













    27














    27










    27









    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






    share|improve this answer
















    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited May 13 at 5:49









    Jenayah

    32.4k10 gold badges148 silver badges194 bronze badges




    32.4k10 gold badges148 silver badges194 bronze badges










    answered May 13 at 4:29









    Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

    4,46614 silver badges31 bronze badges




    4,46614 silver badges31 bronze badges










    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39












    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39







    10




    10





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    May 13 at 4:45





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    May 13 at 4:45




    2




    2





    I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    May 13 at 16:39





    I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    May 13 at 16:39













    60


















    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame







    share|improve this answer























    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16















    60


















    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame







    share|improve this answer























    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16













    60














    60










    60









    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame







    share|improve this answer
















    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame








    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited May 13 at 18:28









    Community

    1




    1










    answered May 13 at 10:02









    TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot

    80.4k33 gold badges517 silver badges554 bronze badges




    80.4k33 gold badges517 silver badges554 bronze badges










    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16












    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16







    13




    13





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    May 13 at 12:44





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    May 13 at 12:44













    While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    May 13 at 22:35





    While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    May 13 at 22:35













    @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 14 at 6:16





    @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 14 at 6:16











    22


















    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






    share|improve this answer























    • 16





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44















    22


















    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






    share|improve this answer























    • 16





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44













    22














    22










    22









    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






    share|improve this answer
















    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited May 13 at 5:50









    Jenayah

    32.4k10 gold badges148 silver badges194 bronze badges




    32.4k10 gold badges148 silver badges194 bronze badges










    answered May 13 at 5:20









    Stark07Stark07

    13.3k8 gold badges58 silver badges110 bronze badges




    13.3k8 gold badges58 silver badges110 bronze badges










    • 16





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44












    • 16





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44







    16




    16





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    May 13 at 7:38





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    May 13 at 7:38













    I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    May 13 at 8:23





    I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    May 13 at 8:23




    13




    13





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    May 13 at 10:47





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    May 13 at 10:47




    2




    2





    @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    May 13 at 13:58





    @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    May 13 at 13:58




    1




    1





    You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:44





    You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:44











    9



















    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







    share|improve this answer





















    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29















    9



















    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







    share|improve this answer





















    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29













    9














    9










    9










    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







    share|improve this answer















    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019








    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered May 13 at 5:53









    JenayahJenayah

    32.4k10 gold badges148 silver badges194 bronze badges




    32.4k10 gold badges148 silver badges194 bronze badges










    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29












    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29







    3




    3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 14:32





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 14:32













    @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 15:05





    @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 15:05




    3




    3





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:18





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:18




    1




    1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 20:21





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 20:21




    2




    2





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:29





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:29











    1


















    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






    share|improve this answer




























    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49















    1


















    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






    share|improve this answer




























    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49













    1














    1










    1









    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






    share|improve this answer
















    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited May 16 at 13:54

























    answered May 14 at 5:54









    Christopher VellaChristopher Vella

    1613 bronze badges




    1613 bronze badges















    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49

















    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49
















    Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:46





    Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:46













    The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

    – Christopher Vella
    May 16 at 13:49





    The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

    – Christopher Vella
    May 16 at 13:49











    0


















    Because it would kill them



    This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



    Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






    share|improve this answer
































      0


















      Because it would kill them



      This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



      Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






      share|improve this answer






























        0














        0










        0









        Because it would kill them



        This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



        Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






        share|improve this answer
















        Because it would kill them



        This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



        Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited May 16 at 20:57









        Laurel

        10.3k2 gold badges31 silver badges60 bronze badges




        10.3k2 gold badges31 silver badges60 bronze badges










        answered May 16 at 19:45









        AndreyAndrey

        7056 silver badges18 bronze badges




        7056 silver badges18 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212300%2fwhy-didnt-the-avengers-use-this-object-earlier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?