Expectation over a max operationDoes a sample version of the one-sided Chebyshev inequality exist?Cantelli's inequality proofChernoff Bound: Prove that $P[u geq alpha] leq (e^-salpha U(s))^N$Bernstein's inequality for heavy-tailed random variablesInequality regarding expectation of function of a random variableConstructing example showing $mathbbE(X^-1)=(mathbbE(X))^-1$Expectation of square root of sum of independent squared uniform random variablesTwo distributions, same mean, different variance: Stochastic dominance for deviation from mean?Random variables - proof of convergence in probability
Use GPLv3 library in a closed system (no software distribution)
Is it unusual that English uses possessive for past tense?
The use of SlotSequence in If[#1 > #2, ##] &
What's the best way to annotate this syncopation?
Other database besides UTXO?
Should I respond to a sabotage accusation e-mail at work?
Did the US push the Kurds to lower their defences against Turkey in the months preceding the latest Turkish military operation against them?
Probability of a number being rational
A toy model in 0-d QFT
Why is 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 b6 so unpopular?
出かけることにしました - What is the meaning of this?
Why it is a big deal whether or not Adam Schiff talked to the whistleblower?
Are my triangles similar?
Who inspired the character Geordi La Forge?
FPGA starts working after irrelevant changes, why?
Conveying the idea of "tricky"
Generate an array with custom index
Fantasy series about a human girl with gold tattoos who makes too much blood
Meaning of “Bulldog drooled courses through his jowls”
Why didn't Aboriginal Australians discover agriculture?
Would a spacecraft carry arc welding supplies?
Datetime conversion from date vs explicit midnight
Repair drywall and protect wires on back of electrical panel
Can every type of linear filter be modelled by a convolution?
Expectation over a max operation
Does a sample version of the one-sided Chebyshev inequality exist?Cantelli's inequality proofChernoff Bound: Prove that $P[u geq alpha] leq (e^-salpha U(s))^N$Bernstein's inequality for heavy-tailed random variablesInequality regarding expectation of function of a random variableConstructing example showing $mathbbE(X^-1)=(mathbbE(X))^-1$Expectation of square root of sum of independent squared uniform random variablesTwo distributions, same mean, different variance: Stochastic dominance for deviation from mean?Random variables - proof of convergence in probability
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Let $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ be a "non-negative" random variable and $c$ is a "given" strictly positive number. I wonder if the following inequality holds:
$$
E[maxX,c] leq maxE[X],c,
$$
where $E[cdot]$ is the expectation.
I suspect from Jensen's inequality the other way around should be true; but since the $c$ above is a certain constant, I'm still (naively) hopeful that it could be true.
probability mathematical-statistics
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ be a "non-negative" random variable and $c$ is a "given" strictly positive number. I wonder if the following inequality holds:
$$
E[maxX,c] leq maxE[X],c,
$$
where $E[cdot]$ is the expectation.
I suspect from Jensen's inequality the other way around should be true; but since the $c$ above is a certain constant, I'm still (naively) hopeful that it could be true.
probability mathematical-statistics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$newcommandEBbbE$For any constant $c$, $xmapsto max(x,c)$ is a convex function, so as you noted, Jensen's inequality gives us $E[max(X,c)]ge maxleft(E[X],cright)$.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Jun 1 at 12:46
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ be a "non-negative" random variable and $c$ is a "given" strictly positive number. I wonder if the following inequality holds:
$$
E[maxX,c] leq maxE[X],c,
$$
where $E[cdot]$ is the expectation.
I suspect from Jensen's inequality the other way around should be true; but since the $c$ above is a certain constant, I'm still (naively) hopeful that it could be true.
probability mathematical-statistics
$endgroup$
Let $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ be a "non-negative" random variable and $c$ is a "given" strictly positive number. I wonder if the following inequality holds:
$$
E[maxX,c] leq maxE[X],c,
$$
where $E[cdot]$ is the expectation.
I suspect from Jensen's inequality the other way around should be true; but since the $c$ above is a certain constant, I'm still (naively) hopeful that it could be true.
probability mathematical-statistics
probability mathematical-statistics
edited May 27 at 13:02
Navid Noroozi
asked May 27 at 12:39
Navid NorooziNavid Noroozi
312 bronze badges
312 bronze badges
$begingroup$
$newcommandEBbbE$For any constant $c$, $xmapsto max(x,c)$ is a convex function, so as you noted, Jensen's inequality gives us $E[max(X,c)]ge maxleft(E[X],cright)$.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Jun 1 at 12:46
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
$newcommandEBbbE$For any constant $c$, $xmapsto max(x,c)$ is a convex function, so as you noted, Jensen's inequality gives us $E[max(X,c)]ge maxleft(E[X],cright)$.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Jun 1 at 12:46
$begingroup$
$newcommandEBbbE$For any constant $c$, $xmapsto max(x,c)$ is a convex function, so as you noted, Jensen's inequality gives us $E[max(X,c)]ge maxleft(E[X],cright)$.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Jun 1 at 12:46
$begingroup$
$newcommandEBbbE$For any constant $c$, $xmapsto max(x,c)$ is a convex function, so as you noted, Jensen's inequality gives us $E[max(X,c)]ge maxleft(E[X],cright)$.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Jun 1 at 12:46
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $textmax(mathbbE[X], c) = c$, as $textmax(X,c) geq c$, we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq c \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
When $textmax(mathbbE[X],c) = mathbbE[X]$ then again as $textmax(X,c) geq X$ we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq mathbbE[X] \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
So that the inequality is actually the other way
$$
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] geq textmax(mathbbE[X], c)
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you obtain "$c ge max(mathbbE[X], c)$"?
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 13:44
$begingroup$
If you speak about the third line of my answer, I simply substituted $c$ by $textmax(mathbbE[X],c)$
$endgroup$
– winperikle
May 27 at 14:01
1
$begingroup$
Sorry about that comment--I figured it out immediately after writing it and thought I had deleted it. (+1 already.)
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 14:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Similar to winperikle's answer, just tightening the arguments a bit:
$maxX, c geq X$ and $maxX, c geq c$. So, by taking expectation, $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq textE X$ and $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq c$. Combining, we get $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq max textE X, c$.
These arguments can be generalized to show that for a sequence of $mathcalL_1$ random variables $(X_n)_ngeq 1$, $textE left(sup_n geq 1 |X_n| right) geq sup_n geq 1 textE|X_n|$.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let X be uniform in (0, 5) and c=2. Here you have a counterexample with each side of the inequality being 3.5 and 2.5
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your reply. But as $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ your counterexample could not be applied.
$endgroup$
– Navid Noroozi
May 27 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
Oops! My bad! But you can take X uniform in (0,5) and c=2, leading to the same thing. Let's edit the answer
$endgroup$
– David
May 27 at 13:21
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The inequality you have asserted is false: A simple counter-example is $X sim textBin(2,tfrac12)$ and $c=1$, which gives you the expectation:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) = frac34 cdot 1 + frac14 cdot 2 = frac54.$$
For this counter-example we have:
$$frac54 = mathbbE(max(X,c)) > max(mathbbE(X),c) = 1.$$
There is a related inequality that is true: Although the inequality you have asserted is false (or at least, not generally true), the following alternative inequality is true:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) geqslant max(mathbbE(X), c).$$
This inequality can easily be proven either for the discrete or continuous (or mixed) case. For a discrete random variable you have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX x cdot p_X(x) = mathbbE(X). \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
You also have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX c cdot p_X(x) = c. \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
Putting these together gives the inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f410281%2fexpectation-over-a-max-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $textmax(mathbbE[X], c) = c$, as $textmax(X,c) geq c$, we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq c \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
When $textmax(mathbbE[X],c) = mathbbE[X]$ then again as $textmax(X,c) geq X$ we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq mathbbE[X] \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
So that the inequality is actually the other way
$$
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] geq textmax(mathbbE[X], c)
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you obtain "$c ge max(mathbbE[X], c)$"?
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 13:44
$begingroup$
If you speak about the third line of my answer, I simply substituted $c$ by $textmax(mathbbE[X],c)$
$endgroup$
– winperikle
May 27 at 14:01
1
$begingroup$
Sorry about that comment--I figured it out immediately after writing it and thought I had deleted it. (+1 already.)
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 14:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If $textmax(mathbbE[X], c) = c$, as $textmax(X,c) geq c$, we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq c \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
When $textmax(mathbbE[X],c) = mathbbE[X]$ then again as $textmax(X,c) geq X$ we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq mathbbE[X] \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
So that the inequality is actually the other way
$$
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] geq textmax(mathbbE[X], c)
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How did you obtain "$c ge max(mathbbE[X], c)$"?
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 13:44
$begingroup$
If you speak about the third line of my answer, I simply substituted $c$ by $textmax(mathbbE[X],c)$
$endgroup$
– winperikle
May 27 at 14:01
1
$begingroup$
Sorry about that comment--I figured it out immediately after writing it and thought I had deleted it. (+1 already.)
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 14:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If $textmax(mathbbE[X], c) = c$, as $textmax(X,c) geq c$, we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq c \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
When $textmax(mathbbE[X],c) = mathbbE[X]$ then again as $textmax(X,c) geq X$ we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq mathbbE[X] \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
So that the inequality is actually the other way
$$
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] geq textmax(mathbbE[X], c)
$$
$endgroup$
If $textmax(mathbbE[X], c) = c$, as $textmax(X,c) geq c$, we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq c \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
When $textmax(mathbbE[X],c) = mathbbE[X]$ then again as $textmax(X,c) geq X$ we have
beginalign*
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] &geq mathbbE[X] \
&geq textmax(mathbbE[X],c)
endalign*
So that the inequality is actually the other way
$$
mathbbE[textmax(X,c)] geq textmax(mathbbE[X], c)
$$
answered May 27 at 13:31
winperiklewinperikle
5831 silver badge9 bronze badges
5831 silver badge9 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
How did you obtain "$c ge max(mathbbE[X], c)$"?
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 13:44
$begingroup$
If you speak about the third line of my answer, I simply substituted $c$ by $textmax(mathbbE[X],c)$
$endgroup$
– winperikle
May 27 at 14:01
1
$begingroup$
Sorry about that comment--I figured it out immediately after writing it and thought I had deleted it. (+1 already.)
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 14:53
add a comment
|
2
$begingroup$
How did you obtain "$c ge max(mathbbE[X], c)$"?
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 13:44
$begingroup$
If you speak about the third line of my answer, I simply substituted $c$ by $textmax(mathbbE[X],c)$
$endgroup$
– winperikle
May 27 at 14:01
1
$begingroup$
Sorry about that comment--I figured it out immediately after writing it and thought I had deleted it. (+1 already.)
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 14:53
2
2
$begingroup$
How did you obtain "$c ge max(mathbbE[X], c)$"?
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 13:44
$begingroup$
How did you obtain "$c ge max(mathbbE[X], c)$"?
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 13:44
$begingroup$
If you speak about the third line of my answer, I simply substituted $c$ by $textmax(mathbbE[X],c)$
$endgroup$
– winperikle
May 27 at 14:01
$begingroup$
If you speak about the third line of my answer, I simply substituted $c$ by $textmax(mathbbE[X],c)$
$endgroup$
– winperikle
May 27 at 14:01
1
1
$begingroup$
Sorry about that comment--I figured it out immediately after writing it and thought I had deleted it. (+1 already.)
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 14:53
$begingroup$
Sorry about that comment--I figured it out immediately after writing it and thought I had deleted it. (+1 already.)
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 27 at 14:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Similar to winperikle's answer, just tightening the arguments a bit:
$maxX, c geq X$ and $maxX, c geq c$. So, by taking expectation, $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq textE X$ and $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq c$. Combining, we get $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq max textE X, c$.
These arguments can be generalized to show that for a sequence of $mathcalL_1$ random variables $(X_n)_ngeq 1$, $textE left(sup_n geq 1 |X_n| right) geq sup_n geq 1 textE|X_n|$.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Similar to winperikle's answer, just tightening the arguments a bit:
$maxX, c geq X$ and $maxX, c geq c$. So, by taking expectation, $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq textE X$ and $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq c$. Combining, we get $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq max textE X, c$.
These arguments can be generalized to show that for a sequence of $mathcalL_1$ random variables $(X_n)_ngeq 1$, $textE left(sup_n geq 1 |X_n| right) geq sup_n geq 1 textE|X_n|$.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Similar to winperikle's answer, just tightening the arguments a bit:
$maxX, c geq X$ and $maxX, c geq c$. So, by taking expectation, $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq textE X$ and $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq c$. Combining, we get $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq max textE X, c$.
These arguments can be generalized to show that for a sequence of $mathcalL_1$ random variables $(X_n)_ngeq 1$, $textE left(sup_n geq 1 |X_n| right) geq sup_n geq 1 textE|X_n|$.
$endgroup$
Similar to winperikle's answer, just tightening the arguments a bit:
$maxX, c geq X$ and $maxX, c geq c$. So, by taking expectation, $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq textE X$ and $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq c$. Combining, we get $textEleft(maxX, cright) geq max textE X, c$.
These arguments can be generalized to show that for a sequence of $mathcalL_1$ random variables $(X_n)_ngeq 1$, $textE left(sup_n geq 1 |X_n| right) geq sup_n geq 1 textE|X_n|$.
answered May 28 at 5:55
rishicrishic
964 bronze badges
964 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let X be uniform in (0, 5) and c=2. Here you have a counterexample with each side of the inequality being 3.5 and 2.5
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your reply. But as $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ your counterexample could not be applied.
$endgroup$
– Navid Noroozi
May 27 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
Oops! My bad! But you can take X uniform in (0,5) and c=2, leading to the same thing. Let's edit the answer
$endgroup$
– David
May 27 at 13:21
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let X be uniform in (0, 5) and c=2. Here you have a counterexample with each side of the inequality being 3.5 and 2.5
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your reply. But as $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ your counterexample could not be applied.
$endgroup$
– Navid Noroozi
May 27 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
Oops! My bad! But you can take X uniform in (0,5) and c=2, leading to the same thing. Let's edit the answer
$endgroup$
– David
May 27 at 13:21
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let X be uniform in (0, 5) and c=2. Here you have a counterexample with each side of the inequality being 3.5 and 2.5
$endgroup$
Let X be uniform in (0, 5) and c=2. Here you have a counterexample with each side of the inequality being 3.5 and 2.5
edited May 27 at 13:23
answered May 27 at 12:57
DavidDavid
1,6781 gold badge1 silver badge12 bronze badges
1,6781 gold badge1 silver badge12 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thanks for your reply. But as $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ your counterexample could not be applied.
$endgroup$
– Navid Noroozi
May 27 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
Oops! My bad! But you can take X uniform in (0,5) and c=2, leading to the same thing. Let's edit the answer
$endgroup$
– David
May 27 at 13:21
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Thanks for your reply. But as $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ your counterexample could not be applied.
$endgroup$
– Navid Noroozi
May 27 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
Oops! My bad! But you can take X uniform in (0,5) and c=2, leading to the same thing. Let's edit the answer
$endgroup$
– David
May 27 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for your reply. But as $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ your counterexample could not be applied.
$endgroup$
– Navid Noroozi
May 27 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Thanks for your reply. But as $X in mathbbR_geq 0$ your counterexample could not be applied.
$endgroup$
– Navid Noroozi
May 27 at 13:05
1
1
$begingroup$
Oops! My bad! But you can take X uniform in (0,5) and c=2, leading to the same thing. Let's edit the answer
$endgroup$
– David
May 27 at 13:21
$begingroup$
Oops! My bad! But you can take X uniform in (0,5) and c=2, leading to the same thing. Let's edit the answer
$endgroup$
– David
May 27 at 13:21
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The inequality you have asserted is false: A simple counter-example is $X sim textBin(2,tfrac12)$ and $c=1$, which gives you the expectation:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) = frac34 cdot 1 + frac14 cdot 2 = frac54.$$
For this counter-example we have:
$$frac54 = mathbbE(max(X,c)) > max(mathbbE(X),c) = 1.$$
There is a related inequality that is true: Although the inequality you have asserted is false (or at least, not generally true), the following alternative inequality is true:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) geqslant max(mathbbE(X), c).$$
This inequality can easily be proven either for the discrete or continuous (or mixed) case. For a discrete random variable you have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX x cdot p_X(x) = mathbbE(X). \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
You also have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX c cdot p_X(x) = c. \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
Putting these together gives the inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The inequality you have asserted is false: A simple counter-example is $X sim textBin(2,tfrac12)$ and $c=1$, which gives you the expectation:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) = frac34 cdot 1 + frac14 cdot 2 = frac54.$$
For this counter-example we have:
$$frac54 = mathbbE(max(X,c)) > max(mathbbE(X),c) = 1.$$
There is a related inequality that is true: Although the inequality you have asserted is false (or at least, not generally true), the following alternative inequality is true:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) geqslant max(mathbbE(X), c).$$
This inequality can easily be proven either for the discrete or continuous (or mixed) case. For a discrete random variable you have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX x cdot p_X(x) = mathbbE(X). \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
You also have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX c cdot p_X(x) = c. \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
Putting these together gives the inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The inequality you have asserted is false: A simple counter-example is $X sim textBin(2,tfrac12)$ and $c=1$, which gives you the expectation:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) = frac34 cdot 1 + frac14 cdot 2 = frac54.$$
For this counter-example we have:
$$frac54 = mathbbE(max(X,c)) > max(mathbbE(X),c) = 1.$$
There is a related inequality that is true: Although the inequality you have asserted is false (or at least, not generally true), the following alternative inequality is true:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) geqslant max(mathbbE(X), c).$$
This inequality can easily be proven either for the discrete or continuous (or mixed) case. For a discrete random variable you have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX x cdot p_X(x) = mathbbE(X). \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
You also have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX c cdot p_X(x) = c. \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
Putting these together gives the inequality.
$endgroup$
The inequality you have asserted is false: A simple counter-example is $X sim textBin(2,tfrac12)$ and $c=1$, which gives you the expectation:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) = frac34 cdot 1 + frac14 cdot 2 = frac54.$$
For this counter-example we have:
$$frac54 = mathbbE(max(X,c)) > max(mathbbE(X),c) = 1.$$
There is a related inequality that is true: Although the inequality you have asserted is false (or at least, not generally true), the following alternative inequality is true:
$$mathbbE(max(X,c)) geqslant max(mathbbE(X), c).$$
This inequality can easily be proven either for the discrete or continuous (or mixed) case. For a discrete random variable you have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX x cdot p_X(x) = mathbbE(X). \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
You also have:
$$beginequation beginaligned
mathbbE(max(X,c))
&= sum_x in mathscrX max(x,c) cdot p_X(x) \[8pt]
&geqslant sum_x in mathscrX c cdot p_X(x) = c. \[8pt]
endaligned endequation$$
Putting these together gives the inequality.
answered May 28 at 6:48
BenBen
39.1k2 gold badges51 silver badges170 bronze badges
39.1k2 gold badges51 silver badges170 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f410281%2fexpectation-over-a-max-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
$newcommandEBbbE$For any constant $c$, $xmapsto max(x,c)$ is a convex function, so as you noted, Jensen's inequality gives us $E[max(X,c)]ge maxleft(E[X],cright)$.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Jun 1 at 12:46