Coffee Grounds and Gritty Butter Cream IcingHow long can frosting with butter, powdered sugar, salt, vanilla, and milk, that is covered with fondant be left out of the refrigerator?Coffee whipped cream fillingPiping whipped cream icing vs buttercream
Am I obligated to pass on domain knowledge after being let go?
Can the category of partial orders be fully embedded in the category of linear orders?
Is lens flare shot organically, or added in post-production?
Round up my number
Is it harder to enter an atmosphere perpendicular or at an angle
What is the "scientific name" of Slavic / Proto-Slavic ra, re / or, er change?
Site is accessible by domain in all browsers but Chrome
Making one list from two lists by grouping them in a special way
How many atoms in the hydrocarbon?
How do professors and lecturers learn to teach?
A short novel about reaching absolute zero
Is there a material or method to allow "swimmable" coins?
QuantLib Python: caplet/swaption pricing under dual curve
Are lances and nets and versatile weapons considered one-handed weapons?
Query more than 50000 records
Who owns copyright on works found in a storage unit/attic?
What is the logic for the map maker classifying the map this way, specifically in Canada?
Unpaid suspension due to management error
Why should you have travel insurance?
Why doesn't the road lose its thickness to the tyre?
Why is dwarfism considered an advantage for jobs in space?
Why is Brownian motion useful in finance?
What is written in this excerpt from a Manifest of Alien Passengers for the US arriving at Providence?
Can any number of squares sum to a square?
Coffee Grounds and Gritty Butter Cream Icing
How long can frosting with butter, powdered sugar, salt, vanilla, and milk, that is covered with fondant be left out of the refrigerator?Coffee whipped cream fillingPiping whipped cream icing vs buttercream
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
Is there any way to dissolve coffee grinds once added to a butter cream frosting?
I used instant coffee crystals in the past and they have always dissolved when simply added to the butter cream during the mixing stage — without having to dissolve in any sort of hot liquid prior to adding.
I have made this mocha butter cream frosting several times in the past, but didn’t think it through when I decided to use regular coffee instead of instant, which I discovered — albeit too late — that I was out of.
frosting
add a comment
|
Is there any way to dissolve coffee grinds once added to a butter cream frosting?
I used instant coffee crystals in the past and they have always dissolved when simply added to the butter cream during the mixing stage — without having to dissolve in any sort of hot liquid prior to adding.
I have made this mocha butter cream frosting several times in the past, but didn’t think it through when I decided to use regular coffee instead of instant, which I discovered — albeit too late — that I was out of.
frosting
hmm chewy frosting. Kind of like chocolate covered coffee beans. Just eat it and enjoy.
– Mark Schultheiss
Sep 30 at 20:26
add a comment
|
Is there any way to dissolve coffee grinds once added to a butter cream frosting?
I used instant coffee crystals in the past and they have always dissolved when simply added to the butter cream during the mixing stage — without having to dissolve in any sort of hot liquid prior to adding.
I have made this mocha butter cream frosting several times in the past, but didn’t think it through when I decided to use regular coffee instead of instant, which I discovered — albeit too late — that I was out of.
frosting
Is there any way to dissolve coffee grinds once added to a butter cream frosting?
I used instant coffee crystals in the past and they have always dissolved when simply added to the butter cream during the mixing stage — without having to dissolve in any sort of hot liquid prior to adding.
I have made this mocha butter cream frosting several times in the past, but didn’t think it through when I decided to use regular coffee instead of instant, which I discovered — albeit too late — that I was out of.
frosting
frosting
edited Sep 29 at 18:05
JakeGould
1115 bronze badges
1115 bronze badges
asked Sep 28 at 12:30
Anoma HettigeAnoma Hettige
1513 bronze badges
1513 bronze badges
hmm chewy frosting. Kind of like chocolate covered coffee beans. Just eat it and enjoy.
– Mark Schultheiss
Sep 30 at 20:26
add a comment
|
hmm chewy frosting. Kind of like chocolate covered coffee beans. Just eat it and enjoy.
– Mark Schultheiss
Sep 30 at 20:26
hmm chewy frosting. Kind of like chocolate covered coffee beans. Just eat it and enjoy.
– Mark Schultheiss
Sep 30 at 20:26
hmm chewy frosting. Kind of like chocolate covered coffee beans. Just eat it and enjoy.
– Mark Schultheiss
Sep 30 at 20:26
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Instant coffee is "soluble solids of ground coffee" - ie, they made coffee, then they dried the result.
Actual ground coffee will never dissolve.
When you make 'real' coffee you run/pour/pass water through the ground coffee, then throw away the solids. There's no getting around the 'throwing away' part.
Would a very fine mesh filter catch the coffee grounds? It may be worth a shot if there is one, but otherwise it's chuck it and start over.
– GdD
Sep 28 at 21:07
3
@GdD I can't see that working. The sugar in buttercream is solid and would also be caught in the filter, even if you melted it enough to flow.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 6:50
add a comment
|
It's a bit late now, but if you've only got real coffee and want to make buttercream you can still do it. I made a latte buttercream by brewing very strong coffee in hot milk, then straining it and adding the liquid to the plain buttercream ingredients, tasting and adjusting the proportions for texture. It worked well.
I did this by:
- Brewing 1 Tbsp of ground coffee in 3–4 Tbsp of hot milk for a few minutes and straining,
- Beating together 250 g slightly softened butter and 500 g icing sugar, adding most of the latte.
It must have been about a year ago when I did this – they were pumpkin spice latte cupcakes because of a discussion caused by the drinks of the same name, but I've found my notes with the real proportions.
1
It's much easier to use Stack Exchange's "Markdown" formatting than HTML. I edited that as an example, since I was editing anyway (your last sentence was a bit mangled).
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 15:45
1
Thanks @DavidRicherby. I pasted from the source of my recipe notes, which are in html, and was so surprised it worked that I forgot to change it to markdown.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 17:15
Aha. I think all HTML that's equivalent to some markdown works, along with HTML character entities and things like that.
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 17:16
@DavidRicherby what's annoying is that character codes work in answers but not comments.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 18:53
add a comment
|
The particle size of regular ground coffee is too large to use in icing, as you’ve found; you’ll be able to see and feel the individual particles. But coffee specifically ground for making espresso is much finer — it’s much closer to a fine powder than “grounds” — works nicely. It still won’t actually dissolve, per se, but the individual bits are undetectable. Tastes better than instant, too.
You're still going to end up with that funny 'squeaky teeth' feeling, though - like those new "barista-style" instant coffees with added grit… I mean 'real ground coffee' ;)
– Tetsujin
Sep 28 at 16:05
1
probably the same fine grind: outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22416/12619 If I end up drinking some it's just a little grainy, I haven't noticed squeaky teeth. If it were dispersed in food I'm pretty confident it would be completely unnoticeable.
– uhoh
Sep 30 at 16:35
add a comment
|
As discussed here, the human palate is remarkably sensitive to granularity. Even particles as fine as 2 microns have an effect on the subjective perception of food. This means it's going to be very hard to grind something fine enough by hand that it doesn't significantly affect the finished product.
You can get away with adding cocoa powder to frosting because it has grains on the order of 10 microns in diameter. For some perspective, this is about the size of what gets through a coffee filter. Some googling suggests that the grounds themselves are on the order of 100 microns in diameter.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "49"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102594%2fcoffee-grounds-and-gritty-butter-cream-icing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Instant coffee is "soluble solids of ground coffee" - ie, they made coffee, then they dried the result.
Actual ground coffee will never dissolve.
When you make 'real' coffee you run/pour/pass water through the ground coffee, then throw away the solids. There's no getting around the 'throwing away' part.
Would a very fine mesh filter catch the coffee grounds? It may be worth a shot if there is one, but otherwise it's chuck it and start over.
– GdD
Sep 28 at 21:07
3
@GdD I can't see that working. The sugar in buttercream is solid and would also be caught in the filter, even if you melted it enough to flow.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 6:50
add a comment
|
Instant coffee is "soluble solids of ground coffee" - ie, they made coffee, then they dried the result.
Actual ground coffee will never dissolve.
When you make 'real' coffee you run/pour/pass water through the ground coffee, then throw away the solids. There's no getting around the 'throwing away' part.
Would a very fine mesh filter catch the coffee grounds? It may be worth a shot if there is one, but otherwise it's chuck it and start over.
– GdD
Sep 28 at 21:07
3
@GdD I can't see that working. The sugar in buttercream is solid and would also be caught in the filter, even if you melted it enough to flow.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 6:50
add a comment
|
Instant coffee is "soluble solids of ground coffee" - ie, they made coffee, then they dried the result.
Actual ground coffee will never dissolve.
When you make 'real' coffee you run/pour/pass water through the ground coffee, then throw away the solids. There's no getting around the 'throwing away' part.
Instant coffee is "soluble solids of ground coffee" - ie, they made coffee, then they dried the result.
Actual ground coffee will never dissolve.
When you make 'real' coffee you run/pour/pass water through the ground coffee, then throw away the solids. There's no getting around the 'throwing away' part.
answered Sep 28 at 12:53
TetsujinTetsujin
8,1311 gold badge22 silver badges38 bronze badges
8,1311 gold badge22 silver badges38 bronze badges
Would a very fine mesh filter catch the coffee grounds? It may be worth a shot if there is one, but otherwise it's chuck it and start over.
– GdD
Sep 28 at 21:07
3
@GdD I can't see that working. The sugar in buttercream is solid and would also be caught in the filter, even if you melted it enough to flow.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 6:50
add a comment
|
Would a very fine mesh filter catch the coffee grounds? It may be worth a shot if there is one, but otherwise it's chuck it and start over.
– GdD
Sep 28 at 21:07
3
@GdD I can't see that working. The sugar in buttercream is solid and would also be caught in the filter, even if you melted it enough to flow.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 6:50
Would a very fine mesh filter catch the coffee grounds? It may be worth a shot if there is one, but otherwise it's chuck it and start over.
– GdD
Sep 28 at 21:07
Would a very fine mesh filter catch the coffee grounds? It may be worth a shot if there is one, but otherwise it's chuck it and start over.
– GdD
Sep 28 at 21:07
3
3
@GdD I can't see that working. The sugar in buttercream is solid and would also be caught in the filter, even if you melted it enough to flow.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 6:50
@GdD I can't see that working. The sugar in buttercream is solid and would also be caught in the filter, even if you melted it enough to flow.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 6:50
add a comment
|
It's a bit late now, but if you've only got real coffee and want to make buttercream you can still do it. I made a latte buttercream by brewing very strong coffee in hot milk, then straining it and adding the liquid to the plain buttercream ingredients, tasting and adjusting the proportions for texture. It worked well.
I did this by:
- Brewing 1 Tbsp of ground coffee in 3–4 Tbsp of hot milk for a few minutes and straining,
- Beating together 250 g slightly softened butter and 500 g icing sugar, adding most of the latte.
It must have been about a year ago when I did this – they were pumpkin spice latte cupcakes because of a discussion caused by the drinks of the same name, but I've found my notes with the real proportions.
1
It's much easier to use Stack Exchange's "Markdown" formatting than HTML. I edited that as an example, since I was editing anyway (your last sentence was a bit mangled).
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 15:45
1
Thanks @DavidRicherby. I pasted from the source of my recipe notes, which are in html, and was so surprised it worked that I forgot to change it to markdown.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 17:15
Aha. I think all HTML that's equivalent to some markdown works, along with HTML character entities and things like that.
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 17:16
@DavidRicherby what's annoying is that character codes work in answers but not comments.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 18:53
add a comment
|
It's a bit late now, but if you've only got real coffee and want to make buttercream you can still do it. I made a latte buttercream by brewing very strong coffee in hot milk, then straining it and adding the liquid to the plain buttercream ingredients, tasting and adjusting the proportions for texture. It worked well.
I did this by:
- Brewing 1 Tbsp of ground coffee in 3–4 Tbsp of hot milk for a few minutes and straining,
- Beating together 250 g slightly softened butter and 500 g icing sugar, adding most of the latte.
It must have been about a year ago when I did this – they were pumpkin spice latte cupcakes because of a discussion caused by the drinks of the same name, but I've found my notes with the real proportions.
1
It's much easier to use Stack Exchange's "Markdown" formatting than HTML. I edited that as an example, since I was editing anyway (your last sentence was a bit mangled).
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 15:45
1
Thanks @DavidRicherby. I pasted from the source of my recipe notes, which are in html, and was so surprised it worked that I forgot to change it to markdown.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 17:15
Aha. I think all HTML that's equivalent to some markdown works, along with HTML character entities and things like that.
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 17:16
@DavidRicherby what's annoying is that character codes work in answers but not comments.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 18:53
add a comment
|
It's a bit late now, but if you've only got real coffee and want to make buttercream you can still do it. I made a latte buttercream by brewing very strong coffee in hot milk, then straining it and adding the liquid to the plain buttercream ingredients, tasting and adjusting the proportions for texture. It worked well.
I did this by:
- Brewing 1 Tbsp of ground coffee in 3–4 Tbsp of hot milk for a few minutes and straining,
- Beating together 250 g slightly softened butter and 500 g icing sugar, adding most of the latte.
It must have been about a year ago when I did this – they were pumpkin spice latte cupcakes because of a discussion caused by the drinks of the same name, but I've found my notes with the real proportions.
It's a bit late now, but if you've only got real coffee and want to make buttercream you can still do it. I made a latte buttercream by brewing very strong coffee in hot milk, then straining it and adding the liquid to the plain buttercream ingredients, tasting and adjusting the proportions for texture. It worked well.
I did this by:
- Brewing 1 Tbsp of ground coffee in 3–4 Tbsp of hot milk for a few minutes and straining,
- Beating together 250 g slightly softened butter and 500 g icing sugar, adding most of the latte.
It must have been about a year ago when I did this – they were pumpkin spice latte cupcakes because of a discussion caused by the drinks of the same name, but I've found my notes with the real proportions.
edited Sep 29 at 15:45
David Richerby
3,13116 silver badges29 bronze badges
3,13116 silver badges29 bronze badges
answered Sep 29 at 6:56
Chris HChris H
26.3k1 gold badge48 silver badges75 bronze badges
26.3k1 gold badge48 silver badges75 bronze badges
1
It's much easier to use Stack Exchange's "Markdown" formatting than HTML. I edited that as an example, since I was editing anyway (your last sentence was a bit mangled).
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 15:45
1
Thanks @DavidRicherby. I pasted from the source of my recipe notes, which are in html, and was so surprised it worked that I forgot to change it to markdown.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 17:15
Aha. I think all HTML that's equivalent to some markdown works, along with HTML character entities and things like that.
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 17:16
@DavidRicherby what's annoying is that character codes work in answers but not comments.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 18:53
add a comment
|
1
It's much easier to use Stack Exchange's "Markdown" formatting than HTML. I edited that as an example, since I was editing anyway (your last sentence was a bit mangled).
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 15:45
1
Thanks @DavidRicherby. I pasted from the source of my recipe notes, which are in html, and was so surprised it worked that I forgot to change it to markdown.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 17:15
Aha. I think all HTML that's equivalent to some markdown works, along with HTML character entities and things like that.
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 17:16
@DavidRicherby what's annoying is that character codes work in answers but not comments.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 18:53
1
1
It's much easier to use Stack Exchange's "Markdown" formatting than HTML. I edited that as an example, since I was editing anyway (your last sentence was a bit mangled).
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 15:45
It's much easier to use Stack Exchange's "Markdown" formatting than HTML. I edited that as an example, since I was editing anyway (your last sentence was a bit mangled).
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 15:45
1
1
Thanks @DavidRicherby. I pasted from the source of my recipe notes, which are in html, and was so surprised it worked that I forgot to change it to markdown.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 17:15
Thanks @DavidRicherby. I pasted from the source of my recipe notes, which are in html, and was so surprised it worked that I forgot to change it to markdown.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 17:15
Aha. I think all HTML that's equivalent to some markdown works, along with HTML character entities and things like that.
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 17:16
Aha. I think all HTML that's equivalent to some markdown works, along with HTML character entities and things like that.
– David Richerby
Sep 29 at 17:16
@DavidRicherby what's annoying is that character codes work in answers but not comments.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 18:53
@DavidRicherby what's annoying is that character codes work in answers but not comments.
– Chris H
Sep 29 at 18:53
add a comment
|
The particle size of regular ground coffee is too large to use in icing, as you’ve found; you’ll be able to see and feel the individual particles. But coffee specifically ground for making espresso is much finer — it’s much closer to a fine powder than “grounds” — works nicely. It still won’t actually dissolve, per se, but the individual bits are undetectable. Tastes better than instant, too.
You're still going to end up with that funny 'squeaky teeth' feeling, though - like those new "barista-style" instant coffees with added grit… I mean 'real ground coffee' ;)
– Tetsujin
Sep 28 at 16:05
1
probably the same fine grind: outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22416/12619 If I end up drinking some it's just a little grainy, I haven't noticed squeaky teeth. If it were dispersed in food I'm pretty confident it would be completely unnoticeable.
– uhoh
Sep 30 at 16:35
add a comment
|
The particle size of regular ground coffee is too large to use in icing, as you’ve found; you’ll be able to see and feel the individual particles. But coffee specifically ground for making espresso is much finer — it’s much closer to a fine powder than “grounds” — works nicely. It still won’t actually dissolve, per se, but the individual bits are undetectable. Tastes better than instant, too.
You're still going to end up with that funny 'squeaky teeth' feeling, though - like those new "barista-style" instant coffees with added grit… I mean 'real ground coffee' ;)
– Tetsujin
Sep 28 at 16:05
1
probably the same fine grind: outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22416/12619 If I end up drinking some it's just a little grainy, I haven't noticed squeaky teeth. If it were dispersed in food I'm pretty confident it would be completely unnoticeable.
– uhoh
Sep 30 at 16:35
add a comment
|
The particle size of regular ground coffee is too large to use in icing, as you’ve found; you’ll be able to see and feel the individual particles. But coffee specifically ground for making espresso is much finer — it’s much closer to a fine powder than “grounds” — works nicely. It still won’t actually dissolve, per se, but the individual bits are undetectable. Tastes better than instant, too.
The particle size of regular ground coffee is too large to use in icing, as you’ve found; you’ll be able to see and feel the individual particles. But coffee specifically ground for making espresso is much finer — it’s much closer to a fine powder than “grounds” — works nicely. It still won’t actually dissolve, per se, but the individual bits are undetectable. Tastes better than instant, too.
answered Sep 28 at 13:39
Ernest Friedman-HillErnest Friedman-Hill
2831 silver badge7 bronze badges
2831 silver badge7 bronze badges
You're still going to end up with that funny 'squeaky teeth' feeling, though - like those new "barista-style" instant coffees with added grit… I mean 'real ground coffee' ;)
– Tetsujin
Sep 28 at 16:05
1
probably the same fine grind: outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22416/12619 If I end up drinking some it's just a little grainy, I haven't noticed squeaky teeth. If it were dispersed in food I'm pretty confident it would be completely unnoticeable.
– uhoh
Sep 30 at 16:35
add a comment
|
You're still going to end up with that funny 'squeaky teeth' feeling, though - like those new "barista-style" instant coffees with added grit… I mean 'real ground coffee' ;)
– Tetsujin
Sep 28 at 16:05
1
probably the same fine grind: outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22416/12619 If I end up drinking some it's just a little grainy, I haven't noticed squeaky teeth. If it were dispersed in food I'm pretty confident it would be completely unnoticeable.
– uhoh
Sep 30 at 16:35
You're still going to end up with that funny 'squeaky teeth' feeling, though - like those new "barista-style" instant coffees with added grit… I mean 'real ground coffee' ;)
– Tetsujin
Sep 28 at 16:05
You're still going to end up with that funny 'squeaky teeth' feeling, though - like those new "barista-style" instant coffees with added grit… I mean 'real ground coffee' ;)
– Tetsujin
Sep 28 at 16:05
1
1
probably the same fine grind: outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22416/12619 If I end up drinking some it's just a little grainy, I haven't noticed squeaky teeth. If it were dispersed in food I'm pretty confident it would be completely unnoticeable.
– uhoh
Sep 30 at 16:35
probably the same fine grind: outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22416/12619 If I end up drinking some it's just a little grainy, I haven't noticed squeaky teeth. If it were dispersed in food I'm pretty confident it would be completely unnoticeable.
– uhoh
Sep 30 at 16:35
add a comment
|
As discussed here, the human palate is remarkably sensitive to granularity. Even particles as fine as 2 microns have an effect on the subjective perception of food. This means it's going to be very hard to grind something fine enough by hand that it doesn't significantly affect the finished product.
You can get away with adding cocoa powder to frosting because it has grains on the order of 10 microns in diameter. For some perspective, this is about the size of what gets through a coffee filter. Some googling suggests that the grounds themselves are on the order of 100 microns in diameter.
add a comment
|
As discussed here, the human palate is remarkably sensitive to granularity. Even particles as fine as 2 microns have an effect on the subjective perception of food. This means it's going to be very hard to grind something fine enough by hand that it doesn't significantly affect the finished product.
You can get away with adding cocoa powder to frosting because it has grains on the order of 10 microns in diameter. For some perspective, this is about the size of what gets through a coffee filter. Some googling suggests that the grounds themselves are on the order of 100 microns in diameter.
add a comment
|
As discussed here, the human palate is remarkably sensitive to granularity. Even particles as fine as 2 microns have an effect on the subjective perception of food. This means it's going to be very hard to grind something fine enough by hand that it doesn't significantly affect the finished product.
You can get away with adding cocoa powder to frosting because it has grains on the order of 10 microns in diameter. For some perspective, this is about the size of what gets through a coffee filter. Some googling suggests that the grounds themselves are on the order of 100 microns in diameter.
As discussed here, the human palate is remarkably sensitive to granularity. Even particles as fine as 2 microns have an effect on the subjective perception of food. This means it's going to be very hard to grind something fine enough by hand that it doesn't significantly affect the finished product.
You can get away with adding cocoa powder to frosting because it has grains on the order of 10 microns in diameter. For some perspective, this is about the size of what gets through a coffee filter. Some googling suggests that the grounds themselves are on the order of 100 microns in diameter.
edited Sep 30 at 18:23
answered Sep 28 at 22:01
Charles HudginsCharles Hudgins
1836 bronze badges
1836 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Seasoned Advice!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102594%2fcoffee-grounds-and-gritty-butter-cream-icing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
hmm chewy frosting. Kind of like chocolate covered coffee beans. Just eat it and enjoy.
– Mark Schultheiss
Sep 30 at 20:26