Chern class of a vector bundle and the associated projective space bundleCanonical Vector Bundle associated to a complete intersectionSeemingly contradictional facts on whether Chern classes determine a line bundle or not.Projective bundle is projective?Computing degrees of projective varieties via Chern classesChern classes of the associated vector bundle of a branched coveringTangent bundle of product of projective spacesChern class computation of push forward.How can I compute the chern roots of a vector bundle using the characteristic classes?Universal property of the tautological line bundleEvery cycle class a Chern class?
How many chess players are over 2500 Elo?
Why do they consider the Ori false gods?
What's the connection between "kicking a pigeon" and "how a bill becomes a law"?
Mother abusing my finances
Is there an explanation for Austria's Freedom Party virtually retaining its vote share despite recent scandal?
Is it ok to put a subplot to a story that is never meant to contribute to the development of the main plot?
Glitch in ac sinewave interfering with phase cut dimming
What caused the tendency for conservatives to not support climate change reform?
What is a subpixel in Super Mario Bros, and how does it relate to wall clipping?
Best strategy for UK visa for a school trip (travelling alone or accomanpied child)?
Circumcircle bisects the segment connecting the vertices of two regular even-sided polygons
What is the most important source of natural gas? coal, oil or other?
What environment would goblins be best adapted for?
Crossing US border with music files I'm legally allowed to possess
What is the difference between nullifying your vote and not going to vote at all?
For which distribution same pdf is generated for given random variable
If a massive object like Jupiter flew past the Earth how close would it need to come to pull people off of the surface?
Is CD audio quality good enough for the final delivery of music?
Where did the “Vikings wear helmets with horn” stereotype come from and why?
Uses of T extends U?
What F1 in name of seeds/varieties means?
Could I be denied entry into Ireland due to medical and police situations during a previous UK visit?
What is the National Identification Number of Dutch citizens?
Why does the UK have more political parties than the US?
Chern class of a vector bundle and the associated projective space bundle
Canonical Vector Bundle associated to a complete intersectionSeemingly contradictional facts on whether Chern classes determine a line bundle or not.Projective bundle is projective?Computing degrees of projective varieties via Chern classesChern classes of the associated vector bundle of a branched coveringTangent bundle of product of projective spacesChern class computation of push forward.How can I compute the chern roots of a vector bundle using the characteristic classes?Universal property of the tautological line bundleEvery cycle class a Chern class?
$begingroup$
I have a very basic question regarding Chern classes. Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety and $mathcalE$ a vector bundle on it. Let $pi:mathbbP(mathcalE)to X$ denote the projective space bundle over $X$ associated to $mathcalE$.
How are the Chern classes $c_i$ of the vector bundle $mathcalE$ on $X$ related to the Chern classes $c_i'$ of the projective variety $mathbbP(mathcalE)$, i.e. the Chern classes of the tangent bundle of $mathbbP(mathcalE)$? My naive hope would be that we simply have $c_i'=pi^* c_i$. Is that true? Is there a good reference?
algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a very basic question regarding Chern classes. Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety and $mathcalE$ a vector bundle on it. Let $pi:mathbbP(mathcalE)to X$ denote the projective space bundle over $X$ associated to $mathcalE$.
How are the Chern classes $c_i$ of the vector bundle $mathcalE$ on $X$ related to the Chern classes $c_i'$ of the projective variety $mathbbP(mathcalE)$, i.e. the Chern classes of the tangent bundle of $mathbbP(mathcalE)$? My naive hope would be that we simply have $c_i'=pi^* c_i$. Is that true? Is there a good reference?
algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The answer is correct, but one can say more. There is a formula for the tangent bundle of a projective bundle that relates it to the pullback of the tangent bundle from below AND the relative tangent bundle. So there is a formula, but the formula makes it clear that what you are asking will almost never hold.
$endgroup$
– aginensky
Apr 13 at 20:10
$begingroup$
Hi @aginensky ! That sounds interesting, can you maybe state this formula in a new answer or point me to a reference?
$endgroup$
– Hans
Apr 15 at 7:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a very basic question regarding Chern classes. Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety and $mathcalE$ a vector bundle on it. Let $pi:mathbbP(mathcalE)to X$ denote the projective space bundle over $X$ associated to $mathcalE$.
How are the Chern classes $c_i$ of the vector bundle $mathcalE$ on $X$ related to the Chern classes $c_i'$ of the projective variety $mathbbP(mathcalE)$, i.e. the Chern classes of the tangent bundle of $mathbbP(mathcalE)$? My naive hope would be that we simply have $c_i'=pi^* c_i$. Is that true? Is there a good reference?
algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
$endgroup$
I have a very basic question regarding Chern classes. Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety and $mathcalE$ a vector bundle on it. Let $pi:mathbbP(mathcalE)to X$ denote the projective space bundle over $X$ associated to $mathcalE$.
How are the Chern classes $c_i$ of the vector bundle $mathcalE$ on $X$ related to the Chern classes $c_i'$ of the projective variety $mathbbP(mathcalE)$, i.e. the Chern classes of the tangent bundle of $mathbbP(mathcalE)$? My naive hope would be that we simply have $c_i'=pi^* c_i$. Is that true? Is there a good reference?
algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
algebraic-geometry vector-bundles
asked Apr 13 at 14:31
HansHans
1,687616
1,687616
1
$begingroup$
The answer is correct, but one can say more. There is a formula for the tangent bundle of a projective bundle that relates it to the pullback of the tangent bundle from below AND the relative tangent bundle. So there is a formula, but the formula makes it clear that what you are asking will almost never hold.
$endgroup$
– aginensky
Apr 13 at 20:10
$begingroup$
Hi @aginensky ! That sounds interesting, can you maybe state this formula in a new answer or point me to a reference?
$endgroup$
– Hans
Apr 15 at 7:55
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The answer is correct, but one can say more. There is a formula for the tangent bundle of a projective bundle that relates it to the pullback of the tangent bundle from below AND the relative tangent bundle. So there is a formula, but the formula makes it clear that what you are asking will almost never hold.
$endgroup$
– aginensky
Apr 13 at 20:10
$begingroup$
Hi @aginensky ! That sounds interesting, can you maybe state this formula in a new answer or point me to a reference?
$endgroup$
– Hans
Apr 15 at 7:55
1
1
$begingroup$
The answer is correct, but one can say more. There is a formula for the tangent bundle of a projective bundle that relates it to the pullback of the tangent bundle from below AND the relative tangent bundle. So there is a formula, but the formula makes it clear that what you are asking will almost never hold.
$endgroup$
– aginensky
Apr 13 at 20:10
$begingroup$
The answer is correct, but one can say more. There is a formula for the tangent bundle of a projective bundle that relates it to the pullback of the tangent bundle from below AND the relative tangent bundle. So there is a formula, but the formula makes it clear that what you are asking will almost never hold.
$endgroup$
– aginensky
Apr 13 at 20:10
$begingroup$
Hi @aginensky ! That sounds interesting, can you maybe state this formula in a new answer or point me to a reference?
$endgroup$
– Hans
Apr 15 at 7:55
$begingroup$
Hi @aginensky ! That sounds interesting, can you maybe state this formula in a new answer or point me to a reference?
$endgroup$
– Hans
Apr 15 at 7:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The nice relation that you hope for is not true unfortunately. Here is a counter-example: consider the trivial rank 2 vector bundle $E= mathcalO oplus mathcalO$ over $mathbbCP^1$. Then $$mathbbP(E) cong mathbbCP^1 times mathbbCP^1.$$
Now, note that $c_2(E)=0$ since $E$ is a trivial bundle, but $int_mathbbP(E) c_2(TmathbbP(E)) = 4$, since this is equal to the topological Euler characteristic of $mathbbP(E)$ (it is a standard result that the integral of the top Chern class of a complex manifold is equal to the topological Euler characteristic).
In general, I don't think that there will be a nice relation (although I could be wrong) since when $E$ has different Chern numbers, the topological type of $mathbbP(E)$ will be different in general, so we are not even talking about Chern classes on the same complex manifold. However, you can actually compute some topological invariants of $mathbbP(E)$ from the chern classes of $E$: see Proposition 15 of Okonek and Van de Ven's "Cubic forms and complex 3-folds".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186298%2fchern-class-of-a-vector-bundle-and-the-associated-projective-space-bundle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The nice relation that you hope for is not true unfortunately. Here is a counter-example: consider the trivial rank 2 vector bundle $E= mathcalO oplus mathcalO$ over $mathbbCP^1$. Then $$mathbbP(E) cong mathbbCP^1 times mathbbCP^1.$$
Now, note that $c_2(E)=0$ since $E$ is a trivial bundle, but $int_mathbbP(E) c_2(TmathbbP(E)) = 4$, since this is equal to the topological Euler characteristic of $mathbbP(E)$ (it is a standard result that the integral of the top Chern class of a complex manifold is equal to the topological Euler characteristic).
In general, I don't think that there will be a nice relation (although I could be wrong) since when $E$ has different Chern numbers, the topological type of $mathbbP(E)$ will be different in general, so we are not even talking about Chern classes on the same complex manifold. However, you can actually compute some topological invariants of $mathbbP(E)$ from the chern classes of $E$: see Proposition 15 of Okonek and Van de Ven's "Cubic forms and complex 3-folds".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nice relation that you hope for is not true unfortunately. Here is a counter-example: consider the trivial rank 2 vector bundle $E= mathcalO oplus mathcalO$ over $mathbbCP^1$. Then $$mathbbP(E) cong mathbbCP^1 times mathbbCP^1.$$
Now, note that $c_2(E)=0$ since $E$ is a trivial bundle, but $int_mathbbP(E) c_2(TmathbbP(E)) = 4$, since this is equal to the topological Euler characteristic of $mathbbP(E)$ (it is a standard result that the integral of the top Chern class of a complex manifold is equal to the topological Euler characteristic).
In general, I don't think that there will be a nice relation (although I could be wrong) since when $E$ has different Chern numbers, the topological type of $mathbbP(E)$ will be different in general, so we are not even talking about Chern classes on the same complex manifold. However, you can actually compute some topological invariants of $mathbbP(E)$ from the chern classes of $E$: see Proposition 15 of Okonek and Van de Ven's "Cubic forms and complex 3-folds".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nice relation that you hope for is not true unfortunately. Here is a counter-example: consider the trivial rank 2 vector bundle $E= mathcalO oplus mathcalO$ over $mathbbCP^1$. Then $$mathbbP(E) cong mathbbCP^1 times mathbbCP^1.$$
Now, note that $c_2(E)=0$ since $E$ is a trivial bundle, but $int_mathbbP(E) c_2(TmathbbP(E)) = 4$, since this is equal to the topological Euler characteristic of $mathbbP(E)$ (it is a standard result that the integral of the top Chern class of a complex manifold is equal to the topological Euler characteristic).
In general, I don't think that there will be a nice relation (although I could be wrong) since when $E$ has different Chern numbers, the topological type of $mathbbP(E)$ will be different in general, so we are not even talking about Chern classes on the same complex manifold. However, you can actually compute some topological invariants of $mathbbP(E)$ from the chern classes of $E$: see Proposition 15 of Okonek and Van de Ven's "Cubic forms and complex 3-folds".
$endgroup$
The nice relation that you hope for is not true unfortunately. Here is a counter-example: consider the trivial rank 2 vector bundle $E= mathcalO oplus mathcalO$ over $mathbbCP^1$. Then $$mathbbP(E) cong mathbbCP^1 times mathbbCP^1.$$
Now, note that $c_2(E)=0$ since $E$ is a trivial bundle, but $int_mathbbP(E) c_2(TmathbbP(E)) = 4$, since this is equal to the topological Euler characteristic of $mathbbP(E)$ (it is a standard result that the integral of the top Chern class of a complex manifold is equal to the topological Euler characteristic).
In general, I don't think that there will be a nice relation (although I could be wrong) since when $E$ has different Chern numbers, the topological type of $mathbbP(E)$ will be different in general, so we are not even talking about Chern classes on the same complex manifold. However, you can actually compute some topological invariants of $mathbbP(E)$ from the chern classes of $E$: see Proposition 15 of Okonek and Van de Ven's "Cubic forms and complex 3-folds".
edited Apr 13 at 14:57
answered Apr 13 at 14:44
Nick LNick L
1,422210
1,422210
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186298%2fchern-class-of-a-vector-bundle-and-the-associated-projective-space-bundle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The answer is correct, but one can say more. There is a formula for the tangent bundle of a projective bundle that relates it to the pullback of the tangent bundle from below AND the relative tangent bundle. So there is a formula, but the formula makes it clear that what you are asking will almost never hold.
$endgroup$
– aginensky
Apr 13 at 20:10
$begingroup$
Hi @aginensky ! That sounds interesting, can you maybe state this formula in a new answer or point me to a reference?
$endgroup$
– Hans
Apr 15 at 7:55