VirtualBox error after last (Ubuntu) Software UpdateVirtualBox 6.0 problem in 14-04 LTSVirtualBox crashed after Ubuntu Mate updateTTY doesn't wait for passwordSafely removing USB 3.0 drive freezes the system - why and how to fix?4.4.0-143-generic upgrade 16.04 VMware no longer workingUpdate broke VirtualBoxIs it safe to automatically install security updates?VirtualBox looses gtk theme after system updateVirtualbox UpdateVirtualbox fullscreen mode stops working after updateProblem with Virtual Box on Xubuntu running under Androidvirtualbox fails after kernel updateCan't sign vboxdrv, mokutil thinks Secure Boot is not supported yet it isError when starting virtualbox after ubuntu updateEnrolling MOK certificate with dkms and virtualbox-dkms (Virtualbox with secure boot enabled)Virtualbox guest won't run - Ubuntu 16.04

Is there a SQL/english like language that lets you define formulations given some data?

Random Double Arc Endpoint Angles

What are these funnel-looking green things in my yard?

U.S. Jurisdiction over Virgin Islands

Why did I get only 5 points even though I won?

Is there any way to stop a user from creating executables and running them?

How to disable "Completion time:..." in SQL Server Messages window

Why aren’t there water shutoff valves for each room?

Can a PC use the Levitate spell to avoid movement speed reduction from exhaustion?

A continuous water "planet" ring around a star

Bitcoin successfully deducted on sender wallet but did not reach receiver wallet

How exactly are corporate bonds priced at issue

First amendment and employment: Can a police department terminate an officer for speech?

Why are Tucker and Malcolm not dead?

80's/90's superhero cartoon with a man on fire and a man who made ice runways like Frozone

Submitting a new paper just after another was accepted by the same journal

Do I have to cite common CS algorithms?

Simplification of numbers

What should I call bands of armed men in the Middle Ages?

Basic properties of expectation in non-separable Banach spaces

visible indication that a cell is not evaluatable

What is a good class if we remove subclasses?

Boss wants me to ignore a software API license prohibiting mass download

How to take the beginning and end parts of a list with simpler syntax?



VirtualBox error after last (Ubuntu) Software Update


VirtualBox 6.0 problem in 14-04 LTSVirtualBox crashed after Ubuntu Mate updateTTY doesn't wait for passwordSafely removing USB 3.0 drive freezes the system - why and how to fix?4.4.0-143-generic upgrade 16.04 VMware no longer workingUpdate broke VirtualBoxIs it safe to automatically install security updates?VirtualBox looses gtk theme after system updateVirtualbox UpdateVirtualbox fullscreen mode stops working after updateProblem with Virtual Box on Xubuntu running under Androidvirtualbox fails after kernel updateCan't sign vboxdrv, mokutil thinks Secure Boot is not supported yet it isError when starting virtualbox after ubuntu updateEnrolling MOK certificate with dkms and virtualbox-dkms (Virtualbox with secure boot enabled)Virtualbox guest won't run - Ubuntu 16.04






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








18















  • Ubuntu version: 16.04


  • VirtualBox version: 5.2.26


  • Updates which have "broken" something: those between last week and today (2019/03/18)


I ran Ubuntu Software Updater this morning, after turning on the computer. Afterwards I tried to launch a Virtual Box machine (version installed via .deb, not the Ubuntu Software Center one) and got that famous error:



Kernel driver not installed (rc=-1908)

The VirtualBox Linux kernel driver (vboxdrv) is either not loaded or there is a permission problem with /dev/vboxdrv. Please reinstall the kernel module by executing

'/sbin/vboxconfig'

as root.

where: suplibOsInit what: 3 VERR_VM_DRIVER_NOT_INSTALLED (-1908) - The support driver is not installed. On linux, open returned ENOENT.


After reading about similar problems and understanding why should I do it, I executed it (same results with 'sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup' and any other solutions to similar problems/posts I've found on this site):



$ sudo /sbin/vboxconfig

vboxdrv.sh: Stopping VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Starting VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Building VirtualBox kernel modules.
vboxdrv.sh: failed: Look at /var/log/vbox-setup.log to find out what went wrong.


Reading the .log, I see that the problem seems to be related with the "get_user_pages" function, and at this point I honestly have no idea how to solve it.



Building the main VirtualBox module.
Error building the module:
make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build SUBDIRS=/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/tmp/vbox.0 -j8 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
mkdir -p /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions ; rm -f /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions/*
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=/tmp/vbox.0
[...]
[...]
[...]
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c: In function ‘rtR0MemObjNativeLockUser’:
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1122:33: warning: passing argument 6 of ‘get_user_pages’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
fWrite, /* force write access. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct page **’ but argument is of type ‘int’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1124:33: warning: passing argument 7 of ‘get_user_pages’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
&pMemLnx->apPages[0], /* Page array. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct vm_area_struct **’ but argument is of type ‘struct page **’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1112:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’
rc = get_user_pages(pTask, /* Task for fault accounting. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: declared here
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
gcc -Wp,-MD,/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include -I./arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi -Iinclude/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h -Iubuntu/include -D__KERNEL__ -fno-pie -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -fno-PIE -fno-pie -no-pie -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mskip-rax-setup -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SSSE3=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CRC32=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX2=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA1_NI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA256_NI=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register -DRETPOLINE -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -O2 --param=allow-store-data-races=0 -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -Wframe-larger-than=1024 -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-var-tracking-assignments -pg -mfentry -DCC_USING_FENTRY -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-merge-all-constants -fmerge-constants -fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=strict-prototypes -Werror=date-time -include /tmp/vbox.0/include/VBox/SUPDrvMangling.h -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-pie -I/lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/ -I/tmp/vbox.0/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DRT_OS_LINUX -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DSUPDRV_WITH_RELEASE_LOGGER -Wno-declaration-after-statement -DCONFIG_VBOXDRV_AS_MISC -DRT_ARCH_AMD64 -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(mpnotification_r0drv_linux)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(vboxdrv)" -c -o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.tmp_mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.c
scripts/Makefile.build:285: recipe for target '/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o' failed
make[2]: *** [/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
Makefile:1454: recipe for target '_module_/tmp/vbox.0' failed
make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/vbox.0] Error 2
/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2


I have already tried every solution for similar issues with this error message but none works for me.



Anyone has had similar problems after last Ubuntu updates?



UPDATE:
I have completely uninstalled VirtualBox, restarted the system, installed VirtualBox again, and still the very same error.










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    Absolutely. What I do not understand is that there are people claiming that previous "version" of the error to be solved for Trusty and Xenial this very March 10th and today we have a "new version" of the problem.

    – Alberto Martín
    Mar 18 at 14:28











  • Have you tried VB 6.0?

    – heynnema
    Mar 18 at 14:50






  • 1





    I've seen this today after updating a couple of host machines to 4.4.0-143. One had a pretty old version of VirtualBox on it (5.0.x) and the other had 5.2.x (so not quite so old). After the update neither of them would launch my VMs showing the kernel module not installed problem. I upgrade/reverted to 5.1.38 on both, finally getting them to run the VMs. However, when I try to install guest additions on one of the guests, I get the get_user_pages error in the vboxadd-install.log file.

    – cosimo193
    Mar 18 at 16:48











  • I got the same error recently when I attempted to install Virtualbox 5.2.18 and then v6.0, my latop which is a UEFI system with Secure Boot, so there is an added complication, is yours a UEFI system, if it is let me know as I know how to fix this adn can provide a solution. You can confirm your system is UEFI or not by running the command: cd /sys/firmware/efi

    – user927685
    Mar 18 at 23:17












  • If it may be useful for anyone: there's a bug report at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1821083

    – Ganton
    Mar 23 at 8:30

















18















  • Ubuntu version: 16.04


  • VirtualBox version: 5.2.26


  • Updates which have "broken" something: those between last week and today (2019/03/18)


I ran Ubuntu Software Updater this morning, after turning on the computer. Afterwards I tried to launch a Virtual Box machine (version installed via .deb, not the Ubuntu Software Center one) and got that famous error:



Kernel driver not installed (rc=-1908)

The VirtualBox Linux kernel driver (vboxdrv) is either not loaded or there is a permission problem with /dev/vboxdrv. Please reinstall the kernel module by executing

'/sbin/vboxconfig'

as root.

where: suplibOsInit what: 3 VERR_VM_DRIVER_NOT_INSTALLED (-1908) - The support driver is not installed. On linux, open returned ENOENT.


After reading about similar problems and understanding why should I do it, I executed it (same results with 'sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup' and any other solutions to similar problems/posts I've found on this site):



$ sudo /sbin/vboxconfig

vboxdrv.sh: Stopping VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Starting VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Building VirtualBox kernel modules.
vboxdrv.sh: failed: Look at /var/log/vbox-setup.log to find out what went wrong.


Reading the .log, I see that the problem seems to be related with the "get_user_pages" function, and at this point I honestly have no idea how to solve it.



Building the main VirtualBox module.
Error building the module:
make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build SUBDIRS=/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/tmp/vbox.0 -j8 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
mkdir -p /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions ; rm -f /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions/*
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=/tmp/vbox.0
[...]
[...]
[...]
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c: In function ‘rtR0MemObjNativeLockUser’:
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1122:33: warning: passing argument 6 of ‘get_user_pages’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
fWrite, /* force write access. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct page **’ but argument is of type ‘int’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1124:33: warning: passing argument 7 of ‘get_user_pages’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
&pMemLnx->apPages[0], /* Page array. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct vm_area_struct **’ but argument is of type ‘struct page **’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1112:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’
rc = get_user_pages(pTask, /* Task for fault accounting. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: declared here
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
gcc -Wp,-MD,/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include -I./arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi -Iinclude/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h -Iubuntu/include -D__KERNEL__ -fno-pie -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -fno-PIE -fno-pie -no-pie -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mskip-rax-setup -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SSSE3=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CRC32=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX2=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA1_NI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA256_NI=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register -DRETPOLINE -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -O2 --param=allow-store-data-races=0 -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -Wframe-larger-than=1024 -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-var-tracking-assignments -pg -mfentry -DCC_USING_FENTRY -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-merge-all-constants -fmerge-constants -fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=strict-prototypes -Werror=date-time -include /tmp/vbox.0/include/VBox/SUPDrvMangling.h -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-pie -I/lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/ -I/tmp/vbox.0/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DRT_OS_LINUX -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DSUPDRV_WITH_RELEASE_LOGGER -Wno-declaration-after-statement -DCONFIG_VBOXDRV_AS_MISC -DRT_ARCH_AMD64 -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(mpnotification_r0drv_linux)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(vboxdrv)" -c -o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.tmp_mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.c
scripts/Makefile.build:285: recipe for target '/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o' failed
make[2]: *** [/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
Makefile:1454: recipe for target '_module_/tmp/vbox.0' failed
make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/vbox.0] Error 2
/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2


I have already tried every solution for similar issues with this error message but none works for me.



Anyone has had similar problems after last Ubuntu updates?



UPDATE:
I have completely uninstalled VirtualBox, restarted the system, installed VirtualBox again, and still the very same error.










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    Absolutely. What I do not understand is that there are people claiming that previous "version" of the error to be solved for Trusty and Xenial this very March 10th and today we have a "new version" of the problem.

    – Alberto Martín
    Mar 18 at 14:28











  • Have you tried VB 6.0?

    – heynnema
    Mar 18 at 14:50






  • 1





    I've seen this today after updating a couple of host machines to 4.4.0-143. One had a pretty old version of VirtualBox on it (5.0.x) and the other had 5.2.x (so not quite so old). After the update neither of them would launch my VMs showing the kernel module not installed problem. I upgrade/reverted to 5.1.38 on both, finally getting them to run the VMs. However, when I try to install guest additions on one of the guests, I get the get_user_pages error in the vboxadd-install.log file.

    – cosimo193
    Mar 18 at 16:48











  • I got the same error recently when I attempted to install Virtualbox 5.2.18 and then v6.0, my latop which is a UEFI system with Secure Boot, so there is an added complication, is yours a UEFI system, if it is let me know as I know how to fix this adn can provide a solution. You can confirm your system is UEFI or not by running the command: cd /sys/firmware/efi

    – user927685
    Mar 18 at 23:17












  • If it may be useful for anyone: there's a bug report at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1821083

    – Ganton
    Mar 23 at 8:30













18












18








18


7






  • Ubuntu version: 16.04


  • VirtualBox version: 5.2.26


  • Updates which have "broken" something: those between last week and today (2019/03/18)


I ran Ubuntu Software Updater this morning, after turning on the computer. Afterwards I tried to launch a Virtual Box machine (version installed via .deb, not the Ubuntu Software Center one) and got that famous error:



Kernel driver not installed (rc=-1908)

The VirtualBox Linux kernel driver (vboxdrv) is either not loaded or there is a permission problem with /dev/vboxdrv. Please reinstall the kernel module by executing

'/sbin/vboxconfig'

as root.

where: suplibOsInit what: 3 VERR_VM_DRIVER_NOT_INSTALLED (-1908) - The support driver is not installed. On linux, open returned ENOENT.


After reading about similar problems and understanding why should I do it, I executed it (same results with 'sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup' and any other solutions to similar problems/posts I've found on this site):



$ sudo /sbin/vboxconfig

vboxdrv.sh: Stopping VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Starting VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Building VirtualBox kernel modules.
vboxdrv.sh: failed: Look at /var/log/vbox-setup.log to find out what went wrong.


Reading the .log, I see that the problem seems to be related with the "get_user_pages" function, and at this point I honestly have no idea how to solve it.



Building the main VirtualBox module.
Error building the module:
make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build SUBDIRS=/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/tmp/vbox.0 -j8 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
mkdir -p /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions ; rm -f /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions/*
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=/tmp/vbox.0
[...]
[...]
[...]
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c: In function ‘rtR0MemObjNativeLockUser’:
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1122:33: warning: passing argument 6 of ‘get_user_pages’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
fWrite, /* force write access. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct page **’ but argument is of type ‘int’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1124:33: warning: passing argument 7 of ‘get_user_pages’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
&pMemLnx->apPages[0], /* Page array. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct vm_area_struct **’ but argument is of type ‘struct page **’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1112:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’
rc = get_user_pages(pTask, /* Task for fault accounting. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: declared here
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
gcc -Wp,-MD,/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include -I./arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi -Iinclude/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h -Iubuntu/include -D__KERNEL__ -fno-pie -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -fno-PIE -fno-pie -no-pie -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mskip-rax-setup -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SSSE3=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CRC32=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX2=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA1_NI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA256_NI=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register -DRETPOLINE -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -O2 --param=allow-store-data-races=0 -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -Wframe-larger-than=1024 -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-var-tracking-assignments -pg -mfentry -DCC_USING_FENTRY -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-merge-all-constants -fmerge-constants -fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=strict-prototypes -Werror=date-time -include /tmp/vbox.0/include/VBox/SUPDrvMangling.h -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-pie -I/lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/ -I/tmp/vbox.0/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DRT_OS_LINUX -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DSUPDRV_WITH_RELEASE_LOGGER -Wno-declaration-after-statement -DCONFIG_VBOXDRV_AS_MISC -DRT_ARCH_AMD64 -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(mpnotification_r0drv_linux)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(vboxdrv)" -c -o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.tmp_mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.c
scripts/Makefile.build:285: recipe for target '/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o' failed
make[2]: *** [/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
Makefile:1454: recipe for target '_module_/tmp/vbox.0' failed
make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/vbox.0] Error 2
/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2


I have already tried every solution for similar issues with this error message but none works for me.



Anyone has had similar problems after last Ubuntu updates?



UPDATE:
I have completely uninstalled VirtualBox, restarted the system, installed VirtualBox again, and still the very same error.










share|improve this question
















  • Ubuntu version: 16.04


  • VirtualBox version: 5.2.26


  • Updates which have "broken" something: those between last week and today (2019/03/18)


I ran Ubuntu Software Updater this morning, after turning on the computer. Afterwards I tried to launch a Virtual Box machine (version installed via .deb, not the Ubuntu Software Center one) and got that famous error:



Kernel driver not installed (rc=-1908)

The VirtualBox Linux kernel driver (vboxdrv) is either not loaded or there is a permission problem with /dev/vboxdrv. Please reinstall the kernel module by executing

'/sbin/vboxconfig'

as root.

where: suplibOsInit what: 3 VERR_VM_DRIVER_NOT_INSTALLED (-1908) - The support driver is not installed. On linux, open returned ENOENT.


After reading about similar problems and understanding why should I do it, I executed it (same results with 'sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup' and any other solutions to similar problems/posts I've found on this site):



$ sudo /sbin/vboxconfig

vboxdrv.sh: Stopping VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Starting VirtualBox services.
vboxdrv.sh: Building VirtualBox kernel modules.
vboxdrv.sh: failed: Look at /var/log/vbox-setup.log to find out what went wrong.


Reading the .log, I see that the problem seems to be related with the "get_user_pages" function, and at this point I honestly have no idea how to solve it.



Building the main VirtualBox module.
Error building the module:
make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build SUBDIRS=/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/tmp/vbox.0 -j8 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
mkdir -p /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions ; rm -f /tmp/vbox.0/.tmp_versions/*
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=/tmp/vbox.0
[...]
[...]
[...]
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c: In function ‘rtR0MemObjNativeLockUser’:
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1122:33: warning: passing argument 6 of ‘get_user_pages’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
fWrite, /* force write access. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct page **’ but argument is of type ‘int’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1124:33: warning: passing argument 7 of ‘get_user_pages’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
&pMemLnx->apPages[0], /* Page array. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: expected ‘struct vm_area_struct **’ but argument is of type ‘struct page **’
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1112:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’
rc = get_user_pages(pTask, /* Task for fault accounting. */
^
In file included from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/the-linux-kernel.h:98:0,
from /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:31:
include/linux/mm.h:1222:6: note: declared here
long get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
^
gcc -Wp,-MD,/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include -I./arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude -I./arch/x86/include/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi -Iinclude/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/kconfig.h -Iubuntu/include -D__KERNEL__ -fno-pie -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -fno-PIE -fno-pie -no-pie -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mskip-rax-setup -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SSSE3=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CRC32=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX=1 -DCONFIG_AS_AVX2=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA1_NI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_SHA256_NI=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register -DRETPOLINE -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -O2 --param=allow-store-data-races=0 -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -Wframe-larger-than=1024 -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-var-tracking-assignments -pg -mfentry -DCC_USING_FENTRY -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-merge-all-constants -fmerge-constants -fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=strict-prototypes -Werror=date-time -include /tmp/vbox.0/include/VBox/SUPDrvMangling.h -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-pie -I/lib/modules/4.4.0-143-generic/build/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/ -I/tmp/vbox.0/include -I/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DRT_OS_LINUX -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DSUPDRV_WITH_RELEASE_LOGGER -Wno-declaration-after-statement -DCONFIG_VBOXDRV_AS_MISC -DRT_ARCH_AMD64 -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(mpnotification_r0drv_linux)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(vboxdrv)" -c -o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/.tmp_mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.c
scripts/Makefile.build:285: recipe for target '/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o' failed
make[2]: *** [/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/SUPDrv.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/assert-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/alloc-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/memuserkernel-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mpnotification-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
if [ "-pg" = "-pg" ]; then if [ /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o != "scripts/mod/empty.o" ]; then ./scripts/recordmcount "/tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.o"; fi; fi;
Makefile:1454: recipe for target '_module_/tmp/vbox.0' failed
make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/vbox.0] Error 2
/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2


I have already tried every solution for similar issues with this error message but none works for me.



Anyone has had similar problems after last Ubuntu updates?



UPDATE:
I have completely uninstalled VirtualBox, restarted the system, installed VirtualBox again, and still the very same error.







virtualbox






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 18 at 11:52







Alberto Martín

















asked Mar 18 at 11:12









Alberto MartínAlberto Martín

2451 gold badge3 silver badges10 bronze badges




2451 gold badge3 silver badges10 bronze badges










  • 2





    Absolutely. What I do not understand is that there are people claiming that previous "version" of the error to be solved for Trusty and Xenial this very March 10th and today we have a "new version" of the problem.

    – Alberto Martín
    Mar 18 at 14:28











  • Have you tried VB 6.0?

    – heynnema
    Mar 18 at 14:50






  • 1





    I've seen this today after updating a couple of host machines to 4.4.0-143. One had a pretty old version of VirtualBox on it (5.0.x) and the other had 5.2.x (so not quite so old). After the update neither of them would launch my VMs showing the kernel module not installed problem. I upgrade/reverted to 5.1.38 on both, finally getting them to run the VMs. However, when I try to install guest additions on one of the guests, I get the get_user_pages error in the vboxadd-install.log file.

    – cosimo193
    Mar 18 at 16:48











  • I got the same error recently when I attempted to install Virtualbox 5.2.18 and then v6.0, my latop which is a UEFI system with Secure Boot, so there is an added complication, is yours a UEFI system, if it is let me know as I know how to fix this adn can provide a solution. You can confirm your system is UEFI or not by running the command: cd /sys/firmware/efi

    – user927685
    Mar 18 at 23:17












  • If it may be useful for anyone: there's a bug report at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1821083

    – Ganton
    Mar 23 at 8:30












  • 2





    Absolutely. What I do not understand is that there are people claiming that previous "version" of the error to be solved for Trusty and Xenial this very March 10th and today we have a "new version" of the problem.

    – Alberto Martín
    Mar 18 at 14:28











  • Have you tried VB 6.0?

    – heynnema
    Mar 18 at 14:50






  • 1





    I've seen this today after updating a couple of host machines to 4.4.0-143. One had a pretty old version of VirtualBox on it (5.0.x) and the other had 5.2.x (so not quite so old). After the update neither of them would launch my VMs showing the kernel module not installed problem. I upgrade/reverted to 5.1.38 on both, finally getting them to run the VMs. However, when I try to install guest additions on one of the guests, I get the get_user_pages error in the vboxadd-install.log file.

    – cosimo193
    Mar 18 at 16:48











  • I got the same error recently when I attempted to install Virtualbox 5.2.18 and then v6.0, my latop which is a UEFI system with Secure Boot, so there is an added complication, is yours a UEFI system, if it is let me know as I know how to fix this adn can provide a solution. You can confirm your system is UEFI or not by running the command: cd /sys/firmware/efi

    – user927685
    Mar 18 at 23:17












  • If it may be useful for anyone: there's a bug report at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1821083

    – Ganton
    Mar 23 at 8:30







2




2





Absolutely. What I do not understand is that there are people claiming that previous "version" of the error to be solved for Trusty and Xenial this very March 10th and today we have a "new version" of the problem.

– Alberto Martín
Mar 18 at 14:28





Absolutely. What I do not understand is that there are people claiming that previous "version" of the error to be solved for Trusty and Xenial this very March 10th and today we have a "new version" of the problem.

– Alberto Martín
Mar 18 at 14:28













Have you tried VB 6.0?

– heynnema
Mar 18 at 14:50





Have you tried VB 6.0?

– heynnema
Mar 18 at 14:50




1




1





I've seen this today after updating a couple of host machines to 4.4.0-143. One had a pretty old version of VirtualBox on it (5.0.x) and the other had 5.2.x (so not quite so old). After the update neither of them would launch my VMs showing the kernel module not installed problem. I upgrade/reverted to 5.1.38 on both, finally getting them to run the VMs. However, when I try to install guest additions on one of the guests, I get the get_user_pages error in the vboxadd-install.log file.

– cosimo193
Mar 18 at 16:48





I've seen this today after updating a couple of host machines to 4.4.0-143. One had a pretty old version of VirtualBox on it (5.0.x) and the other had 5.2.x (so not quite so old). After the update neither of them would launch my VMs showing the kernel module not installed problem. I upgrade/reverted to 5.1.38 on both, finally getting them to run the VMs. However, when I try to install guest additions on one of the guests, I get the get_user_pages error in the vboxadd-install.log file.

– cosimo193
Mar 18 at 16:48













I got the same error recently when I attempted to install Virtualbox 5.2.18 and then v6.0, my latop which is a UEFI system with Secure Boot, so there is an added complication, is yours a UEFI system, if it is let me know as I know how to fix this adn can provide a solution. You can confirm your system is UEFI or not by running the command: cd /sys/firmware/efi

– user927685
Mar 18 at 23:17






I got the same error recently when I attempted to install Virtualbox 5.2.18 and then v6.0, my latop which is a UEFI system with Secure Boot, so there is an added complication, is yours a UEFI system, if it is let me know as I know how to fix this adn can provide a solution. You can confirm your system is UEFI or not by running the command: cd /sys/firmware/efi

– user927685
Mar 18 at 23:17














If it may be useful for anyone: there's a bug report at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1821083

– Ganton
Mar 23 at 8:30





If it may be useful for anyone: there's a bug report at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1821083

– Ganton
Mar 23 at 8:30










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















12














The easy answer, for now - use the testbuild provided by Vbox while we wait for a kernel patch.



You can find the build here. You will need to use the current links provided on that page because the ones used here in the example have changed.



Make sure you uninstall your current version:



sudo apt remove virtualbox*
dkpk -r virtualbox
# the tab key will autocomplete the version if there's one for dpkg to remove


Install the test build (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
chmod +x VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
sudo ./VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run


If you need the extension pack (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack
sudo VBoxManage extpack install Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack





share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    Thanks Robco. I haven't had the time to give it a try; I downgraded VirtualBox and in principle I'll just wait until it be fixed or just until next kernel (I really do not need the very last version of VirtualBox). However your solution seems to me the best one for those who need the last/before last version, as far as it be stable. Have you tried it yourself? Is it stable?

    – Alberto Martín
    Mar 23 at 17:49












  • Hi Alberto. Yes, I prefer not to downgrade the kernel and I tried downgrading vbox (maybe I didn't go back far enough) but the driver was still unable to be built. I have done this for 4 users and have had no issues.

    – Robco
    Mar 25 at 14:03






  • 1





    Thank you for the feedback Robco. Sounds pretty good. In that case I guess this is the most elegant solution to the problem so far.

    – Alberto Martín
    Mar 25 at 16:17






  • 1





    You can find the latest test builds on this page: virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds.

    – Tom Saleeba
    Apr 15 at 6:18






  • 1





    This has a caveat: "Please also use version 5.2 if you still need support for 32-bit hosts, as this has been discontinued in 6.0" virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads . 32-bit guests are still supported.

    – Piskvor
    Apr 23 at 11:43


















4














I have the same problems.



I switched back to previous kernel. See this: http://karlcode.owtelse.com/blog/2017/03/13/reverting-to-a-previous-kernel/



after that reinstall virtual box and it's working again.



Regards Alex






share|improve this answer

























  • Hi Alex. As much as that could probably make the trick, I find it way too messy and sometimes risky than just downgrading the very VirtualBox, which will work perfectly.

    – Alberto Martín
    Mar 18 at 13:25


















4














This looks very similar to known bug 1818049 named "virtualbox dkms modules fail to build with linux 4.4.0-143.169 [error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’]".



The real working solution would be the same as for TTY problem - remove latest kernels and install previous good one (4.4.0-138-generic looks best for me - USB 3.0 safely remove will work, getty problem will be absent):



sudo apt-get purge linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic
sudo apt-get purge linux-image-4.4.0-139-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-139-generic
linux-image-4.4.0-140-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-140-generic
linux-image-4.4.0-141-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-141-generic
linux-image-4.4.0-142-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-142-generic
linux-image-4.4.0-143-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-143-generic

sudo apt-get install amd64-microcode intel-microcode thermald
sudo apt-get autoremove

sudo apt-get install linux-image-4.4.0-138-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-138-generic
sudo apt-get install linux-headers-4.4.0-138 linux-headers-4.4.0-138-generic


and reboot afterwards. So we need to wait for normal stable well-tested kernel.



Warning: do not upgrade kernel to 4.4.0-143-generic if you need VirtualBox on guests and hosts. Subscribe to the bug 1818049 and after the confirmation of the fix - install newest kernel back with sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic.






share|improve this answer


































    3














    The easiest fix for Ubuntu 16.04 is to upgrade the kernel to the same version Ubuntu 18.04 uses by running the following command:



    sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-hwe-16.04



    Reboot after running the above command.



    If you run dkms, you won't have to reinstall the guest additions after the machine reboots. Else, reinstall the guest additions, and it should work fine now in Ubuntu 16.04






    share|improve this answer

























    • Thanks, worked for me

      – Jason Morgan
      Apr 26 at 19:27


















    2














    Very much like Alberto's



    1. sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup (I get errors, but stops VBox...)

    2. sudo dpkg -l | grep virtualbox (get VBox version.)

    3. sudo apt-get purge virtualbox-5.XYZ virtualbox-qt (XYZ version from step 2)

    4. Installed from Ubuntu Software: it downgraded to 5.1.38

    Up and running again!






    share|improve this answer
































      2














      After trying pretty hard to solve it (neither DKMS nor Synaptics seem to be useful as workaround to the problem), I've been unable to do it, so as TEMPORARY solution for those who could be in the same situation, and just in order to be able to keep on working with guest machines, I suggest to downgrade VirtualBox to the version USC offers.



      • Just uninstall current VirtualBox version (I did it via Synaptics, but GDebi would perfectly work too).


      • Install VirtualBox USC offered version (either via USC or Synaptics)


      • Downgrade (uninstall-install) VBoxGuestAdditions module in host machine.


      • In the guest machines, remember to downgrade VBoxGuestAdditions (insert old VBoxGuestAdditions CD and run it).


      The problem/error is still there since it doesn't allow to use last VirtualBox version, I hope it helps though, but I would appreciate an ultimate solution in order to be able to install and use .deb version again.



      UPDATE:
      So far it seems that there is not ultimate solution, so in my case* this one keeps on being the simplest one. (* Personally I prefer to downgrade VirtualBox instead of going back to previous Ubuntu kernels).



      However, if for any reason someone needs to use/install the very last version of VirtualBox, he could do it following these instructions, also mentioned by other users:
      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1818049/comments/27






      share|improve this answer


































        1














        I also saw this problem. I have Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. It updated to 4.4.0-143 kernel. Virtualbox (5.2.14) would not build vboxdrv.ko. Downgrading to kernel 4.4.0-142 (then removing -143) resolved the problem.






        share|improve this answer



























          protected by Community Apr 12 at 11:00



          Thank you for your interest in this question.
          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes








          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          12














          The easy answer, for now - use the testbuild provided by Vbox while we wait for a kernel patch.



          You can find the build here. You will need to use the current links provided on that page because the ones used here in the example have changed.



          Make sure you uninstall your current version:



          sudo apt remove virtualbox*
          dkpk -r virtualbox
          # the tab key will autocomplete the version if there's one for dpkg to remove


          Install the test build (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          chmod +x VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          sudo ./VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run


          If you need the extension pack (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack
          sudo VBoxManage extpack install Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack





          share|improve this answer






















          • 1





            Thanks Robco. I haven't had the time to give it a try; I downgraded VirtualBox and in principle I'll just wait until it be fixed or just until next kernel (I really do not need the very last version of VirtualBox). However your solution seems to me the best one for those who need the last/before last version, as far as it be stable. Have you tried it yourself? Is it stable?

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 23 at 17:49












          • Hi Alberto. Yes, I prefer not to downgrade the kernel and I tried downgrading vbox (maybe I didn't go back far enough) but the driver was still unable to be built. I have done this for 4 users and have had no issues.

            – Robco
            Mar 25 at 14:03






          • 1





            Thank you for the feedback Robco. Sounds pretty good. In that case I guess this is the most elegant solution to the problem so far.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 25 at 16:17






          • 1





            You can find the latest test builds on this page: virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds.

            – Tom Saleeba
            Apr 15 at 6:18






          • 1





            This has a caveat: "Please also use version 5.2 if you still need support for 32-bit hosts, as this has been discontinued in 6.0" virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads . 32-bit guests are still supported.

            – Piskvor
            Apr 23 at 11:43















          12














          The easy answer, for now - use the testbuild provided by Vbox while we wait for a kernel patch.



          You can find the build here. You will need to use the current links provided on that page because the ones used here in the example have changed.



          Make sure you uninstall your current version:



          sudo apt remove virtualbox*
          dkpk -r virtualbox
          # the tab key will autocomplete the version if there's one for dpkg to remove


          Install the test build (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          chmod +x VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          sudo ./VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run


          If you need the extension pack (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack
          sudo VBoxManage extpack install Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack





          share|improve this answer






















          • 1





            Thanks Robco. I haven't had the time to give it a try; I downgraded VirtualBox and in principle I'll just wait until it be fixed or just until next kernel (I really do not need the very last version of VirtualBox). However your solution seems to me the best one for those who need the last/before last version, as far as it be stable. Have you tried it yourself? Is it stable?

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 23 at 17:49












          • Hi Alberto. Yes, I prefer not to downgrade the kernel and I tried downgrading vbox (maybe I didn't go back far enough) but the driver was still unable to be built. I have done this for 4 users and have had no issues.

            – Robco
            Mar 25 at 14:03






          • 1





            Thank you for the feedback Robco. Sounds pretty good. In that case I guess this is the most elegant solution to the problem so far.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 25 at 16:17






          • 1





            You can find the latest test builds on this page: virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds.

            – Tom Saleeba
            Apr 15 at 6:18






          • 1





            This has a caveat: "Please also use version 5.2 if you still need support for 32-bit hosts, as this has been discontinued in 6.0" virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads . 32-bit guests are still supported.

            – Piskvor
            Apr 23 at 11:43













          12












          12








          12







          The easy answer, for now - use the testbuild provided by Vbox while we wait for a kernel patch.



          You can find the build here. You will need to use the current links provided on that page because the ones used here in the example have changed.



          Make sure you uninstall your current version:



          sudo apt remove virtualbox*
          dkpk -r virtualbox
          # the tab key will autocomplete the version if there's one for dpkg to remove


          Install the test build (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          chmod +x VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          sudo ./VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run


          If you need the extension pack (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack
          sudo VBoxManage extpack install Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack





          share|improve this answer















          The easy answer, for now - use the testbuild provided by Vbox while we wait for a kernel patch.



          You can find the build here. You will need to use the current links provided on that page because the ones used here in the example have changed.



          Make sure you uninstall your current version:



          sudo apt remove virtualbox*
          dkpk -r virtualbox
          # the tab key will autocomplete the version if there's one for dpkg to remove


          Install the test build (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          chmod +x VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run
          sudo ./VirtualBox-6.0.5-129423-Linux_amd64.run


          If you need the extension pack (change the url to match the latest test build provided by virtualbox using the above link - https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds):



          wget https://www.virtualbox.org/download/testcase/Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack
          sudo VBoxManage extpack install Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.0.5-129380.vbox-extpack






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 15 at 15:22

























          answered Mar 19 at 15:28









          RobcoRobco

          1213 bronze badges




          1213 bronze badges










          • 1





            Thanks Robco. I haven't had the time to give it a try; I downgraded VirtualBox and in principle I'll just wait until it be fixed or just until next kernel (I really do not need the very last version of VirtualBox). However your solution seems to me the best one for those who need the last/before last version, as far as it be stable. Have you tried it yourself? Is it stable?

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 23 at 17:49












          • Hi Alberto. Yes, I prefer not to downgrade the kernel and I tried downgrading vbox (maybe I didn't go back far enough) but the driver was still unable to be built. I have done this for 4 users and have had no issues.

            – Robco
            Mar 25 at 14:03






          • 1





            Thank you for the feedback Robco. Sounds pretty good. In that case I guess this is the most elegant solution to the problem so far.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 25 at 16:17






          • 1





            You can find the latest test builds on this page: virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds.

            – Tom Saleeba
            Apr 15 at 6:18






          • 1





            This has a caveat: "Please also use version 5.2 if you still need support for 32-bit hosts, as this has been discontinued in 6.0" virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads . 32-bit guests are still supported.

            – Piskvor
            Apr 23 at 11:43












          • 1





            Thanks Robco. I haven't had the time to give it a try; I downgraded VirtualBox and in principle I'll just wait until it be fixed or just until next kernel (I really do not need the very last version of VirtualBox). However your solution seems to me the best one for those who need the last/before last version, as far as it be stable. Have you tried it yourself? Is it stable?

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 23 at 17:49












          • Hi Alberto. Yes, I prefer not to downgrade the kernel and I tried downgrading vbox (maybe I didn't go back far enough) but the driver was still unable to be built. I have done this for 4 users and have had no issues.

            – Robco
            Mar 25 at 14:03






          • 1





            Thank you for the feedback Robco. Sounds pretty good. In that case I guess this is the most elegant solution to the problem so far.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 25 at 16:17






          • 1





            You can find the latest test builds on this page: virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds.

            – Tom Saleeba
            Apr 15 at 6:18






          • 1





            This has a caveat: "Please also use version 5.2 if you still need support for 32-bit hosts, as this has been discontinued in 6.0" virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads . 32-bit guests are still supported.

            – Piskvor
            Apr 23 at 11:43







          1




          1





          Thanks Robco. I haven't had the time to give it a try; I downgraded VirtualBox and in principle I'll just wait until it be fixed or just until next kernel (I really do not need the very last version of VirtualBox). However your solution seems to me the best one for those who need the last/before last version, as far as it be stable. Have you tried it yourself? Is it stable?

          – Alberto Martín
          Mar 23 at 17:49






          Thanks Robco. I haven't had the time to give it a try; I downgraded VirtualBox and in principle I'll just wait until it be fixed or just until next kernel (I really do not need the very last version of VirtualBox). However your solution seems to me the best one for those who need the last/before last version, as far as it be stable. Have you tried it yourself? Is it stable?

          – Alberto Martín
          Mar 23 at 17:49














          Hi Alberto. Yes, I prefer not to downgrade the kernel and I tried downgrading vbox (maybe I didn't go back far enough) but the driver was still unable to be built. I have done this for 4 users and have had no issues.

          – Robco
          Mar 25 at 14:03





          Hi Alberto. Yes, I prefer not to downgrade the kernel and I tried downgrading vbox (maybe I didn't go back far enough) but the driver was still unable to be built. I have done this for 4 users and have had no issues.

          – Robco
          Mar 25 at 14:03




          1




          1





          Thank you for the feedback Robco. Sounds pretty good. In that case I guess this is the most elegant solution to the problem so far.

          – Alberto Martín
          Mar 25 at 16:17





          Thank you for the feedback Robco. Sounds pretty good. In that case I guess this is the most elegant solution to the problem so far.

          – Alberto Martín
          Mar 25 at 16:17




          1




          1





          You can find the latest test builds on this page: virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds.

          – Tom Saleeba
          Apr 15 at 6:18





          You can find the latest test builds on this page: virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds.

          – Tom Saleeba
          Apr 15 at 6:18




          1




          1





          This has a caveat: "Please also use version 5.2 if you still need support for 32-bit hosts, as this has been discontinued in 6.0" virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads . 32-bit guests are still supported.

          – Piskvor
          Apr 23 at 11:43





          This has a caveat: "Please also use version 5.2 if you still need support for 32-bit hosts, as this has been discontinued in 6.0" virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads . 32-bit guests are still supported.

          – Piskvor
          Apr 23 at 11:43













          4














          I have the same problems.



          I switched back to previous kernel. See this: http://karlcode.owtelse.com/blog/2017/03/13/reverting-to-a-previous-kernel/



          after that reinstall virtual box and it's working again.



          Regards Alex






          share|improve this answer

























          • Hi Alex. As much as that could probably make the trick, I find it way too messy and sometimes risky than just downgrading the very VirtualBox, which will work perfectly.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 18 at 13:25















          4














          I have the same problems.



          I switched back to previous kernel. See this: http://karlcode.owtelse.com/blog/2017/03/13/reverting-to-a-previous-kernel/



          after that reinstall virtual box and it's working again.



          Regards Alex






          share|improve this answer

























          • Hi Alex. As much as that could probably make the trick, I find it way too messy and sometimes risky than just downgrading the very VirtualBox, which will work perfectly.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 18 at 13:25













          4












          4








          4







          I have the same problems.



          I switched back to previous kernel. See this: http://karlcode.owtelse.com/blog/2017/03/13/reverting-to-a-previous-kernel/



          after that reinstall virtual box and it's working again.



          Regards Alex






          share|improve this answer













          I have the same problems.



          I switched back to previous kernel. See this: http://karlcode.owtelse.com/blog/2017/03/13/reverting-to-a-previous-kernel/



          after that reinstall virtual box and it's working again.



          Regards Alex







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 18 at 12:28









          AlexAlex

          411 bronze badge




          411 bronze badge















          • Hi Alex. As much as that could probably make the trick, I find it way too messy and sometimes risky than just downgrading the very VirtualBox, which will work perfectly.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 18 at 13:25

















          • Hi Alex. As much as that could probably make the trick, I find it way too messy and sometimes risky than just downgrading the very VirtualBox, which will work perfectly.

            – Alberto Martín
            Mar 18 at 13:25
















          Hi Alex. As much as that could probably make the trick, I find it way too messy and sometimes risky than just downgrading the very VirtualBox, which will work perfectly.

          – Alberto Martín
          Mar 18 at 13:25





          Hi Alex. As much as that could probably make the trick, I find it way too messy and sometimes risky than just downgrading the very VirtualBox, which will work perfectly.

          – Alberto Martín
          Mar 18 at 13:25











          4














          This looks very similar to known bug 1818049 named "virtualbox dkms modules fail to build with linux 4.4.0-143.169 [error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’]".



          The real working solution would be the same as for TTY problem - remove latest kernels and install previous good one (4.4.0-138-generic looks best for me - USB 3.0 safely remove will work, getty problem will be absent):



          sudo apt-get purge linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic
          sudo apt-get purge linux-image-4.4.0-139-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-139-generic
          linux-image-4.4.0-140-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-140-generic
          linux-image-4.4.0-141-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-141-generic
          linux-image-4.4.0-142-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-142-generic
          linux-image-4.4.0-143-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-143-generic

          sudo apt-get install amd64-microcode intel-microcode thermald
          sudo apt-get autoremove

          sudo apt-get install linux-image-4.4.0-138-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-138-generic
          sudo apt-get install linux-headers-4.4.0-138 linux-headers-4.4.0-138-generic


          and reboot afterwards. So we need to wait for normal stable well-tested kernel.



          Warning: do not upgrade kernel to 4.4.0-143-generic if you need VirtualBox on guests and hosts. Subscribe to the bug 1818049 and after the confirmation of the fix - install newest kernel back with sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic.






          share|improve this answer































            4














            This looks very similar to known bug 1818049 named "virtualbox dkms modules fail to build with linux 4.4.0-143.169 [error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’]".



            The real working solution would be the same as for TTY problem - remove latest kernels and install previous good one (4.4.0-138-generic looks best for me - USB 3.0 safely remove will work, getty problem will be absent):



            sudo apt-get purge linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic
            sudo apt-get purge linux-image-4.4.0-139-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-139-generic
            linux-image-4.4.0-140-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-140-generic
            linux-image-4.4.0-141-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-141-generic
            linux-image-4.4.0-142-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-142-generic
            linux-image-4.4.0-143-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-143-generic

            sudo apt-get install amd64-microcode intel-microcode thermald
            sudo apt-get autoremove

            sudo apt-get install linux-image-4.4.0-138-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-138-generic
            sudo apt-get install linux-headers-4.4.0-138 linux-headers-4.4.0-138-generic


            and reboot afterwards. So we need to wait for normal stable well-tested kernel.



            Warning: do not upgrade kernel to 4.4.0-143-generic if you need VirtualBox on guests and hosts. Subscribe to the bug 1818049 and after the confirmation of the fix - install newest kernel back with sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic.






            share|improve this answer





























              4












              4








              4







              This looks very similar to known bug 1818049 named "virtualbox dkms modules fail to build with linux 4.4.0-143.169 [error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’]".



              The real working solution would be the same as for TTY problem - remove latest kernels and install previous good one (4.4.0-138-generic looks best for me - USB 3.0 safely remove will work, getty problem will be absent):



              sudo apt-get purge linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic
              sudo apt-get purge linux-image-4.4.0-139-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-139-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-140-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-140-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-141-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-141-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-142-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-142-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-143-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-143-generic

              sudo apt-get install amd64-microcode intel-microcode thermald
              sudo apt-get autoremove

              sudo apt-get install linux-image-4.4.0-138-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-138-generic
              sudo apt-get install linux-headers-4.4.0-138 linux-headers-4.4.0-138-generic


              and reboot afterwards. So we need to wait for normal stable well-tested kernel.



              Warning: do not upgrade kernel to 4.4.0-143-generic if you need VirtualBox on guests and hosts. Subscribe to the bug 1818049 and after the confirmation of the fix - install newest kernel back with sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic.






              share|improve this answer















              This looks very similar to known bug 1818049 named "virtualbox dkms modules fail to build with linux 4.4.0-143.169 [error: too many arguments to function ‘get_user_pages’]".



              The real working solution would be the same as for TTY problem - remove latest kernels and install previous good one (4.4.0-138-generic looks best for me - USB 3.0 safely remove will work, getty problem will be absent):



              sudo apt-get purge linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic
              sudo apt-get purge linux-image-4.4.0-139-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-139-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-140-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-140-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-141-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-141-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-142-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-142-generic
              linux-image-4.4.0-143-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-143-generic

              sudo apt-get install amd64-microcode intel-microcode thermald
              sudo apt-get autoremove

              sudo apt-get install linux-image-4.4.0-138-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-138-generic
              sudo apt-get install linux-headers-4.4.0-138 linux-headers-4.4.0-138-generic


              and reboot afterwards. So we need to wait for normal stable well-tested kernel.



              Warning: do not upgrade kernel to 4.4.0-143-generic if you need VirtualBox on guests and hosts. Subscribe to the bug 1818049 and after the confirmation of the fix - install newest kernel back with sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic linux-headers-generic.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Mar 22 at 17:54

























              answered Mar 18 at 17:36









              N0rbertN0rbert

              30.4k10 gold badges72 silver badges148 bronze badges




              30.4k10 gold badges72 silver badges148 bronze badges
























                  3














                  The easiest fix for Ubuntu 16.04 is to upgrade the kernel to the same version Ubuntu 18.04 uses by running the following command:



                  sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-hwe-16.04



                  Reboot after running the above command.



                  If you run dkms, you won't have to reinstall the guest additions after the machine reboots. Else, reinstall the guest additions, and it should work fine now in Ubuntu 16.04






                  share|improve this answer

























                  • Thanks, worked for me

                    – Jason Morgan
                    Apr 26 at 19:27















                  3














                  The easiest fix for Ubuntu 16.04 is to upgrade the kernel to the same version Ubuntu 18.04 uses by running the following command:



                  sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-hwe-16.04



                  Reboot after running the above command.



                  If you run dkms, you won't have to reinstall the guest additions after the machine reboots. Else, reinstall the guest additions, and it should work fine now in Ubuntu 16.04






                  share|improve this answer

























                  • Thanks, worked for me

                    – Jason Morgan
                    Apr 26 at 19:27













                  3












                  3








                  3







                  The easiest fix for Ubuntu 16.04 is to upgrade the kernel to the same version Ubuntu 18.04 uses by running the following command:



                  sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-hwe-16.04



                  Reboot after running the above command.



                  If you run dkms, you won't have to reinstall the guest additions after the machine reboots. Else, reinstall the guest additions, and it should work fine now in Ubuntu 16.04






                  share|improve this answer













                  The easiest fix for Ubuntu 16.04 is to upgrade the kernel to the same version Ubuntu 18.04 uses by running the following command:



                  sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-hwe-16.04



                  Reboot after running the above command.



                  If you run dkms, you won't have to reinstall the guest additions after the machine reboots. Else, reinstall the guest additions, and it should work fine now in Ubuntu 16.04







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 12 at 16:28









                  OwNOwN

                  1412 bronze badges




                  1412 bronze badges















                  • Thanks, worked for me

                    – Jason Morgan
                    Apr 26 at 19:27

















                  • Thanks, worked for me

                    – Jason Morgan
                    Apr 26 at 19:27
















                  Thanks, worked for me

                  – Jason Morgan
                  Apr 26 at 19:27





                  Thanks, worked for me

                  – Jason Morgan
                  Apr 26 at 19:27











                  2














                  Very much like Alberto's



                  1. sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup (I get errors, but stops VBox...)

                  2. sudo dpkg -l | grep virtualbox (get VBox version.)

                  3. sudo apt-get purge virtualbox-5.XYZ virtualbox-qt (XYZ version from step 2)

                  4. Installed from Ubuntu Software: it downgraded to 5.1.38

                  Up and running again!






                  share|improve this answer





























                    2














                    Very much like Alberto's



                    1. sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup (I get errors, but stops VBox...)

                    2. sudo dpkg -l | grep virtualbox (get VBox version.)

                    3. sudo apt-get purge virtualbox-5.XYZ virtualbox-qt (XYZ version from step 2)

                    4. Installed from Ubuntu Software: it downgraded to 5.1.38

                    Up and running again!






                    share|improve this answer



























                      2












                      2








                      2







                      Very much like Alberto's



                      1. sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup (I get errors, but stops VBox...)

                      2. sudo dpkg -l | grep virtualbox (get VBox version.)

                      3. sudo apt-get purge virtualbox-5.XYZ virtualbox-qt (XYZ version from step 2)

                      4. Installed from Ubuntu Software: it downgraded to 5.1.38

                      Up and running again!






                      share|improve this answer













                      Very much like Alberto's



                      1. sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup (I get errors, but stops VBox...)

                      2. sudo dpkg -l | grep virtualbox (get VBox version.)

                      3. sudo apt-get purge virtualbox-5.XYZ virtualbox-qt (XYZ version from step 2)

                      4. Installed from Ubuntu Software: it downgraded to 5.1.38

                      Up and running again!







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Mar 19 at 10:03









                      Luis CaprilesLuis Capriles

                      211 bronze badge




                      211 bronze badge
























                          2














                          After trying pretty hard to solve it (neither DKMS nor Synaptics seem to be useful as workaround to the problem), I've been unable to do it, so as TEMPORARY solution for those who could be in the same situation, and just in order to be able to keep on working with guest machines, I suggest to downgrade VirtualBox to the version USC offers.



                          • Just uninstall current VirtualBox version (I did it via Synaptics, but GDebi would perfectly work too).


                          • Install VirtualBox USC offered version (either via USC or Synaptics)


                          • Downgrade (uninstall-install) VBoxGuestAdditions module in host machine.


                          • In the guest machines, remember to downgrade VBoxGuestAdditions (insert old VBoxGuestAdditions CD and run it).


                          The problem/error is still there since it doesn't allow to use last VirtualBox version, I hope it helps though, but I would appreciate an ultimate solution in order to be able to install and use .deb version again.



                          UPDATE:
                          So far it seems that there is not ultimate solution, so in my case* this one keeps on being the simplest one. (* Personally I prefer to downgrade VirtualBox instead of going back to previous Ubuntu kernels).



                          However, if for any reason someone needs to use/install the very last version of VirtualBox, he could do it following these instructions, also mentioned by other users:
                          https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1818049/comments/27






                          share|improve this answer































                            2














                            After trying pretty hard to solve it (neither DKMS nor Synaptics seem to be useful as workaround to the problem), I've been unable to do it, so as TEMPORARY solution for those who could be in the same situation, and just in order to be able to keep on working with guest machines, I suggest to downgrade VirtualBox to the version USC offers.



                            • Just uninstall current VirtualBox version (I did it via Synaptics, but GDebi would perfectly work too).


                            • Install VirtualBox USC offered version (either via USC or Synaptics)


                            • Downgrade (uninstall-install) VBoxGuestAdditions module in host machine.


                            • In the guest machines, remember to downgrade VBoxGuestAdditions (insert old VBoxGuestAdditions CD and run it).


                            The problem/error is still there since it doesn't allow to use last VirtualBox version, I hope it helps though, but I would appreciate an ultimate solution in order to be able to install and use .deb version again.



                            UPDATE:
                            So far it seems that there is not ultimate solution, so in my case* this one keeps on being the simplest one. (* Personally I prefer to downgrade VirtualBox instead of going back to previous Ubuntu kernels).



                            However, if for any reason someone needs to use/install the very last version of VirtualBox, he could do it following these instructions, also mentioned by other users:
                            https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1818049/comments/27






                            share|improve this answer





























                              2












                              2








                              2







                              After trying pretty hard to solve it (neither DKMS nor Synaptics seem to be useful as workaround to the problem), I've been unable to do it, so as TEMPORARY solution for those who could be in the same situation, and just in order to be able to keep on working with guest machines, I suggest to downgrade VirtualBox to the version USC offers.



                              • Just uninstall current VirtualBox version (I did it via Synaptics, but GDebi would perfectly work too).


                              • Install VirtualBox USC offered version (either via USC or Synaptics)


                              • Downgrade (uninstall-install) VBoxGuestAdditions module in host machine.


                              • In the guest machines, remember to downgrade VBoxGuestAdditions (insert old VBoxGuestAdditions CD and run it).


                              The problem/error is still there since it doesn't allow to use last VirtualBox version, I hope it helps though, but I would appreciate an ultimate solution in order to be able to install and use .deb version again.



                              UPDATE:
                              So far it seems that there is not ultimate solution, so in my case* this one keeps on being the simplest one. (* Personally I prefer to downgrade VirtualBox instead of going back to previous Ubuntu kernels).



                              However, if for any reason someone needs to use/install the very last version of VirtualBox, he could do it following these instructions, also mentioned by other users:
                              https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1818049/comments/27






                              share|improve this answer















                              After trying pretty hard to solve it (neither DKMS nor Synaptics seem to be useful as workaround to the problem), I've been unable to do it, so as TEMPORARY solution for those who could be in the same situation, and just in order to be able to keep on working with guest machines, I suggest to downgrade VirtualBox to the version USC offers.



                              • Just uninstall current VirtualBox version (I did it via Synaptics, but GDebi would perfectly work too).


                              • Install VirtualBox USC offered version (either via USC or Synaptics)


                              • Downgrade (uninstall-install) VBoxGuestAdditions module in host machine.


                              • In the guest machines, remember to downgrade VBoxGuestAdditions (insert old VBoxGuestAdditions CD and run it).


                              The problem/error is still there since it doesn't allow to use last VirtualBox version, I hope it helps though, but I would appreciate an ultimate solution in order to be able to install and use .deb version again.



                              UPDATE:
                              So far it seems that there is not ultimate solution, so in my case* this one keeps on being the simplest one. (* Personally I prefer to downgrade VirtualBox instead of going back to previous Ubuntu kernels).



                              However, if for any reason someone needs to use/install the very last version of VirtualBox, he could do it following these instructions, also mentioned by other users:
                              https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1818049/comments/27







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Mar 19 at 20:18

























                              answered Mar 18 at 13:25









                              Alberto MartínAlberto Martín

                              2451 gold badge3 silver badges10 bronze badges




                              2451 gold badge3 silver badges10 bronze badges
























                                  1














                                  I also saw this problem. I have Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. It updated to 4.4.0-143 kernel. Virtualbox (5.2.14) would not build vboxdrv.ko. Downgrading to kernel 4.4.0-142 (then removing -143) resolved the problem.






                                  share|improve this answer































                                    1














                                    I also saw this problem. I have Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. It updated to 4.4.0-143 kernel. Virtualbox (5.2.14) would not build vboxdrv.ko. Downgrading to kernel 4.4.0-142 (then removing -143) resolved the problem.






                                    share|improve this answer





























                                      1












                                      1








                                      1







                                      I also saw this problem. I have Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. It updated to 4.4.0-143 kernel. Virtualbox (5.2.14) would not build vboxdrv.ko. Downgrading to kernel 4.4.0-142 (then removing -143) resolved the problem.






                                      share|improve this answer















                                      I also saw this problem. I have Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. It updated to 4.4.0-143 kernel. Virtualbox (5.2.14) would not build vboxdrv.ko. Downgrading to kernel 4.4.0-142 (then removing -143) resolved the problem.







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Apr 2 at 3:10









                                      Philippe Delteil

                                      1,1001 gold badge10 silver badges23 bronze badges




                                      1,1001 gold badge10 silver badges23 bronze badges










                                      answered Apr 1 at 22:20









                                      Brian ArmstrongBrian Armstrong

                                      111 bronze badge




                                      111 bronze badge


















                                          protected by Community Apr 12 at 11:00



                                          Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                                          Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                                          Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?