Why didn't this character “real die” when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon?How/Why did Tyler Durden got shot in the head?Why didn't Gazelle die when Merlin detonates the security chips?Why didn't they take their prisoners to the extraction point?Why is “double-sleeving” a crime in Altered Carbon?Where do empty 'natural' Sleeves come from?In Altered carbon S01E05, why does Ortega bother with taking Dimi's head outside the hotel?Why does this character die?Why didn't Drogon attack this character?
Notation clarity question for a conglomerate of accidentals
Does the 'java' command compile Java programs?
"cd" into /sys/kernel/debug/tracing causes permission change
Function overload for string literals lvalue and rvalue reference
How to prove (A v B), (A → C), (B → D) therefore (C v D)
Unable to delete GeoTIFF after adding it to GeoServer
Is "weekend warrior" derogatory?
How can I find places to store/land a private airplane?
Tuning fork in last two episodes of Legion S02
Is right click on tables bad UX
Is there a pattern for handling conflicting function parameters?
How Concerning Is This X-CU-modified: FAKECU Text Attack?
Job interview by video at home and privacy concerns
How to restrict deletion of specific row of SQL server table
What action is recommended if your accommodation refuses to let you leave without paying additional fees?
Present participles of the verb esse
Why is my vegetable stock bitter, but the chicken stock not?
electricity bill doubled
Does it require less energy to reach the Sun from Pluto's orbit than from Earth's orbit?
Could Boris Johnson face criminal charges for illegally proroguing Parliament?
Why is there such a singular place for bird watching?
Young adult short story book with one story where a woman finds a walrus suit and becomes a walrus
What's the correct way to determine turn order in this situation?
Anonymous reviewer disclosed his identity. Should I thank him by name?
Why didn't this character “real die” when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon?
How/Why did Tyler Durden got shot in the head?Why didn't Gazelle die when Merlin detonates the security chips?Why didn't they take their prisoners to the extraction point?Why is “double-sleeving” a crime in Altered Carbon?Where do empty 'natural' Sleeves come from?In Altered carbon S01E05, why does Ortega bother with taking Dimi's head outside the hotel?Why does this character die?Why didn't Drogon attack this character?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
WARNING: Spoilers ahead.
In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.
From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".
He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.
Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.
If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?
plot-explanation altered-carbon
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
add a comment
|
WARNING: Spoilers ahead.
In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.
From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".
He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.
Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.
If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?
plot-explanation altered-carbon
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
1
I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.
– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08
add a comment
|
WARNING: Spoilers ahead.
In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.
From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".
He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.
Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.
If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?
plot-explanation altered-carbon
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
WARNING: Spoilers ahead.
In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.
From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".
He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.
Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.
If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?
plot-explanation altered-carbon
plot-explanation altered-carbon
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
edited Apr 16 at 17:02
justhalf
1033 bronze badges
1033 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
asked Apr 16 at 10:05
LogicalBranchLogicalBranch
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
5161 gold badge3 silver badges19 bronze badges
1
I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.
– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08
add a comment
|
1
I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.
– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08
1
1
I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.
– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08
I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.
– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.
Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.
One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.
Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.
ScreenRant
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 20:50
2
@Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?
– DeeV
Apr 16 at 22:12
add a comment
|
The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.
Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.
Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.
One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.
Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.
ScreenRant
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 20:50
2
@Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?
– DeeV
Apr 16 at 22:12
add a comment
|
The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.
Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.
One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.
Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.
ScreenRant
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 20:50
2
@Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?
– DeeV
Apr 16 at 22:12
add a comment
|
The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.
Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.
One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.
Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.
ScreenRant
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.
Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.
One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.
Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.
ScreenRant
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
edited Apr 16 at 14:52
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
answered Apr 16 at 10:33
Paulie_DPaulie_D
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
102k19 gold badges382 silver badges339 bronze badges
It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 20:50
2
@Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?
– DeeV
Apr 16 at 22:12
add a comment
|
It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 20:50
2
@Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?
– DeeV
Apr 16 at 22:12
It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 20:50
It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 20:50
2
2
@Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?
– DeeV
Apr 16 at 22:12
@Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?
– DeeV
Apr 16 at 22:12
add a comment
|
The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.
Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
add a comment
|
The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.
Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
add a comment
|
The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.
Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.
Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
edited Apr 17 at 4:36
A J♦
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
48.2k18 gold badges259 silver badges283 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
answered Apr 17 at 1:17
AibobotAibobot
1312 bronze badges
1312 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
1
I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.
– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08