Leaving out pronouns in informal conversationTranslation of “anyway” to change subject of conversationWhat does 'Wie warum' translates to in English, precisely, when you are having a conversation?Should a letter to a future host family be formal or informal?When would you use “man” instead of personal pronouns?“Bulle” for “hoss” as an informal nicknameHow to express “fizzle out” in GermanDo people actually use the word “kaputt” in conversation?“Shall we … ?” as a polite-but-informal suggestion : wollen vs. sollen

UK visitors visa needed fast for badly injured family member

How does the credit rating of a country affect its populace?

Balancing empathy and deferring to the syllabus in teaching responsibilities

Is there way to randomly distribute points within a circle on the surface of a sphere?

"Store" a remote SSH session?

Why is oil used as as the lubricant in power generators, while water is the most available, cheapest and accessible lubricant?

Beautiful planar geometry theorems not encountered in high school

How to explain to traditional people why they should upgrade their old Windows XP device?

What other tricks were there to get more data onto floppy disks?

Car no longer starts, behaved weird before giving up

Buy cheaper bike and upgrade

Seen from Europe, why is there a hard separation between Republicans and Democrats in the US?

Was Haile Selassie the world's only involuntary messiah?

"Startup" working hours - is it normal to be asked to work 11 hours/ day?

Would a warhorse allow its rider to approach a Dragon at all?

SSD not reaching advertised speed

Why does this process map every fraction to the golden ratio?

How would you idiomatically translate the French saying "Il n’y a pas d'amour, il n’y a que des preuves d’amour" to English?

Prevent function taking const std::string& from accepting 0

How can a bigfoot hide from satellites?

Patent Agreement in Order to Graduate

How can I find out where to buy uncommon (for the location) items while traveling?

How to remove solidified paste from toothbrush

CEO says not to expect pay increases unless you do something really exceptional. Is this counter-productive?



Leaving out pronouns in informal conversation


Translation of “anyway” to change subject of conversationWhat does 'Wie warum' translates to in English, precisely, when you are having a conversation?Should a letter to a future host family be formal or informal?When would you use “man” instead of personal pronouns?“Bulle” for “hoss” as an informal nicknameHow to express “fizzle out” in GermanDo people actually use the word “kaputt” in conversation?“Shall we … ?” as a polite-but-informal suggestion : wollen vs. sollen






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








4


















I've seen a few simple sentences leave out an "ich" and go straight to the verb, particularly in very informal conversation or for stylistic reasons.
Here are some examples that come to mind:



In the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going."




Läuft.




In a short, half-hearted introduction:




Bin [name].




In this line from a song, though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it. The song is Wolke 4.




Bin zu tief gefallen.




This is quite common to do in Spanish, but I see it much less often in German. Is this a normal or common kind of colloquial speech in German, and in which cases would it be appropriate?










share|improve this question



























  • Could you please add a few examples?

    – Stephie
    Sep 11 at 13:07











  • How about "läuft." like in the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going." I've also once heard someone say "bin [name]" as a short, half-hearted introduction. but maybe this isn't correct. There's also a song w the line "bin zu tief gefallen" though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:17






  • 1





    I think it's way more common in lyrics than in every day usage

    – infinitezero
    Sep 11 at 14:04











  • "läuft", or "läuft bei dir" have always sounded extremely strange to my (German-speaking (?)) ears. Those certainly aren't idioms you can generalize from.

    – sgf
    Sep 12 at 8:31

















4


















I've seen a few simple sentences leave out an "ich" and go straight to the verb, particularly in very informal conversation or for stylistic reasons.
Here are some examples that come to mind:



In the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going."




Läuft.




In a short, half-hearted introduction:




Bin [name].




In this line from a song, though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it. The song is Wolke 4.




Bin zu tief gefallen.




This is quite common to do in Spanish, but I see it much less often in German. Is this a normal or common kind of colloquial speech in German, and in which cases would it be appropriate?










share|improve this question



























  • Could you please add a few examples?

    – Stephie
    Sep 11 at 13:07











  • How about "läuft." like in the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going." I've also once heard someone say "bin [name]" as a short, half-hearted introduction. but maybe this isn't correct. There's also a song w the line "bin zu tief gefallen" though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:17






  • 1





    I think it's way more common in lyrics than in every day usage

    – infinitezero
    Sep 11 at 14:04











  • "läuft", or "läuft bei dir" have always sounded extremely strange to my (German-speaking (?)) ears. Those certainly aren't idioms you can generalize from.

    – sgf
    Sep 12 at 8:31













4













4









4








I've seen a few simple sentences leave out an "ich" and go straight to the verb, particularly in very informal conversation or for stylistic reasons.
Here are some examples that come to mind:



In the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going."




Läuft.




In a short, half-hearted introduction:




Bin [name].




In this line from a song, though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it. The song is Wolke 4.




Bin zu tief gefallen.




This is quite common to do in Spanish, but I see it much less often in German. Is this a normal or common kind of colloquial speech in German, and in which cases would it be appropriate?










share|improve this question
















I've seen a few simple sentences leave out an "ich" and go straight to the verb, particularly in very informal conversation or for stylistic reasons.
Here are some examples that come to mind:



In the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going."




Läuft.




In a short, half-hearted introduction:




Bin [name].




In this line from a song, though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it. The song is Wolke 4.




Bin zu tief gefallen.




This is quite common to do in Spanish, but I see it much less often in German. Is this a normal or common kind of colloquial speech in German, and in which cases would it be appropriate?







word-usage colloquial slang informal






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 11 at 13:26







theupandup

















asked Sep 11 at 12:50









theupanduptheupandup

1255 bronze badges




1255 bronze badges















  • Could you please add a few examples?

    – Stephie
    Sep 11 at 13:07











  • How about "läuft." like in the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going." I've also once heard someone say "bin [name]" as a short, half-hearted introduction. but maybe this isn't correct. There's also a song w the line "bin zu tief gefallen" though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:17






  • 1





    I think it's way more common in lyrics than in every day usage

    – infinitezero
    Sep 11 at 14:04











  • "läuft", or "läuft bei dir" have always sounded extremely strange to my (German-speaking (?)) ears. Those certainly aren't idioms you can generalize from.

    – sgf
    Sep 12 at 8:31

















  • Could you please add a few examples?

    – Stephie
    Sep 11 at 13:07











  • How about "läuft." like in the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going." I've also once heard someone say "bin [name]" as a short, half-hearted introduction. but maybe this isn't correct. There's also a song w the line "bin zu tief gefallen" though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:17






  • 1





    I think it's way more common in lyrics than in every day usage

    – infinitezero
    Sep 11 at 14:04











  • "läuft", or "läuft bei dir" have always sounded extremely strange to my (German-speaking (?)) ears. Those certainly aren't idioms you can generalize from.

    – sgf
    Sep 12 at 8:31
















Could you please add a few examples?

– Stephie
Sep 11 at 13:07





Could you please add a few examples?

– Stephie
Sep 11 at 13:07













How about "läuft." like in the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going." I've also once heard someone say "bin [name]" as a short, half-hearted introduction. but maybe this isn't correct. There's also a song w the line "bin zu tief gefallen" though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it.

– theupandup
Sep 11 at 13:17





How about "läuft." like in the usage "How's it going?" -- "it's going." I've also once heard someone say "bin [name]" as a short, half-hearted introduction. but maybe this isn't correct. There's also a song w the line "bin zu tief gefallen" though I'm unsure if it's meant to be part of the sentence before it.

– theupandup
Sep 11 at 13:17




1




1





I think it's way more common in lyrics than in every day usage

– infinitezero
Sep 11 at 14:04





I think it's way more common in lyrics than in every day usage

– infinitezero
Sep 11 at 14:04













"läuft", or "läuft bei dir" have always sounded extremely strange to my (German-speaking (?)) ears. Those certainly aren't idioms you can generalize from.

– sgf
Sep 12 at 8:31





"läuft", or "läuft bei dir" have always sounded extremely strange to my (German-speaking (?)) ears. Those certainly aren't idioms you can generalize from.

– sgf
Sep 12 at 8:31










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















9



















A number of languages allow omitting pronouns (even) in formal speech and writing. Spanish is one of them, although the pattern is restricted to subject pronouns.



German, like English, is generally "non-pronoun-dropping". However, in informal and colloquial speech, it's not uncommon in either language. Some often-heard examples:




Kann sein. (Could be.)

Weiß nicht. (Don't know.)

Mach ich. (Will do.)




Linguistically, these omissions are ellipses (Ellipsen). As such, they are not governed by a firm grammatical rule, but by speech register and style. The complete phrases would be:




Es kann [so] sein. (It could be [so].)

Ich weiß nicht. (I don't know.)

Das mache ich. (I will do that.)




In an informal context, it is perfectly normal and not unusual to leave out these pronouns. And although I cannot provide a general rule (as per the above), this is not just true for these examples, but for the majority of ordinary phrases where the sentence's leading subject or object can be easily inferred from context. In fact, Wikipedia, in the article linked first, observes (albeit without a reference):




Colloquial and dialectal German, unlike the standard language, are also partially pro-drop; they typically allow deletion of the subject pronoun in main clauses without inversion, but not otherwise.




In the question's second example, I would consider the "half-hearted" introduction borderline impolite, unless it was immediately preceded by other people introducing themselves using the full sentence ("Ich bin …"). Simply because its demonstrated brevity runs counter to common courtesy. The third example, the line from the song, is however neither informal nor colloquial in style. The elliptical usage there lends a decidedly poetic touch to the lyrics.






share|improve this answer




























  • I must agree. Especially in cases where the verb form clearly and unambiguously designates the subject pronoun, it is not that uncommon to leave it out in colloquial speech. For example in "X bin ..:", the only gramatically valid value for X is ich and it can therefore be omitted without loss of meaning.

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 16:48











  • This is a very helpful response, vielen Dank!

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 20:31











  • This is the best answer, in my opinion. It accepts that these ellipses are often heard.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:43











  • I disagree with the interpretation of that lyrics line as lending a poetic subtext... to me, that feels perfectly informal/colloquial. It might be that it's a local thing here in the Ruhr area, but to me it's a perfectly normal informal response to a question like "Why is your leg in a cast?" ("Wieso haste nen Gips am Bein?" -- "Bin zu tief gefallen.")

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:21












  • @JohnHennig I'm aware of the context, and in the context of that song that line does fit into the poetic style of the song. But I would not go as far as saying that that line is the source of the songs poetic touch (which would be my interpretation of your last sentence, and my interpretation might be flawed, of course). To me, that line in itself does not have nor invoke a poetic touch, simply because I would use it without afterthought in colloquial conversation.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 12:57



















5



















A recommended read on the topic is Vorfeld-Analepse bei Aussagen. It's rather long and difficult, but covers a lot of ground. Custom requires that I mention at least a few pertinent points.



  • It is not wise to conceive of this as dropping pronouns. It's about the Vorfeld being left empty in declarative sentences. In contrast, in a pro-drop language such as Italian, the subject pronoun is optional in interrogatives as well: Capisci?



  • That analepsis is limited to the Vorfeld is shown by examples such as the following.




    Und was sagst du zu den neuen Plänen der Regierung?

    Kenn' ich noch gar nicht.

    *Ich kenn' noch gar nicht.





  • In an example like the following, the dropped element seems to be da, which is not a pronoun and itself refers to drauf, which stands in for a prepositional phrase.




    A: Was denkst du über das Fest?

    B: Freu' ich mich riesig drauf.





  • I find bin (der) David impossible and the following example seems to support this. The idea is that rhematic (new) information cannot be left out.




    Wer hat hier geraucht?

    *Hab' geraucht.





  • In contrast to pro-drop, these kind of sentences require context to work, although the context can be extralinguistic.




    Macht nichts [mit Verweis auf ein vorgefallenes Malheur]








share|improve this answer























  • 1





    For anyone wondering: "Als Analepse wird die Auslassung von Satzbestandteilen bezeichnet, die - anders als bei Ellipsen - nicht aus der Vorstellung, sondern eindeutig aus dem Kontext zu rekonstruieren sind" (taken from the linked reference).

    – phipsgabler
    Sep 12 at 6:57


















3



















This is very uncommon in German and I’m not even sure off the top of my head where it would be heard. While personal pronouns can be reduced a lot (the furthest would probably be Bavarian Wenn’st mogst, if you want, where the st on wenn is essentially what replaces du) they are practically always there in one way or another.



Word order is very flexible in German though, so a personal pronoun may not necessarily be anywhere close to the beginning of a sentence – although the soft ordering rules usually suggest they should be somewhere close-ish.




Edit to include your examples:



Läuft as an answer to ‘how are you’ has almost taken on a life of itself and it might be considered a fixed word rather than a full sentence.



Bin (der) Jan (Southerners like me would include an article, Northerners are more likely not to): Yes, possible, and there are a couple of other occasions where a short answer might be given without a personal pronoun but to me this case gives a vibe of ‘here’s your answer, I’ve been polite, now leave me in peace’. A similar example might be if you fell over and are asked if you’re fine you might answer ‘Geht schon wieder’ – the shortest possible reply. It’s not a very common thing and it only applies to rare cases.



As for music, poetry and literature: they follow their own rules and don’t necessarily form full sentences if it sounds better in another way.






share|improve this answer























  • 1





    good to know, thanks. I figured it's very rare since I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples in years of learning. but I'm less acquainted to colloquial speech and don't want to accidentally over-generalize rare grammatical edge cases.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:42











  • Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob es ein Wegfall vom Pronomen oder "nur" ein Zusammenschmelzen von Verb und Pronomen, aber gerade in der Fragestellung ist in vielen Dialekten anscheinend nichts mehr vom Pronomen übrig. Z.B. Bairisch: "Seids ganga?" (seid ihr gegangen) oder "Habds gessn?" (habt ihr gegessen).

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 15:07











  • @jarnbjo das s am Ende von seids oder habts kann man aber durchaus als Verkürzung von ees also ihr auffassen; mehr noch als das st in wennst magst.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:29






  • 1





    Very uncommon? What planet do you live on? I heard them all the time when I lived in Munich.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:45






  • 1





    @theupandup No, it's rather common in colloquial speech. I can vouch for the Ruhr area, TonyK confirms it for Munich, BusyAnt for Saxony ... and my knowledge of low german also points towards it being rather common. But I agree that you would only acquaint yourself with it when you live in germany and have a circle of friends.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:30


















2



















This is called pro-drop and German is not called a pro-drop language. Quite the opposite, we even add a pronoun when it's not needed at all, Es ist mir klar, "Mir ist klar das" (Mir ist klar, dass "das" wird so nicht mehr verstanden), "Es regnet", where Spanish for example uses just a single word for the later.



Anyway, it would be deemed higly incorrect to say "* Will spielen!".



The exception is perhaps "Bin da, wer noch", as known for example from the lovely show Die Dinos, "Bin schon da", "Bin mir nicht sicher", etc. This could be explained as a special exception, if bin was a particularly strong verb, reflecting a preverbal root akin to "bei", "be-come". I'm not sure how this related to certain moods like the optative mood (na los, lass losgehen "let's go"). The imperative mood does not require a pronoun, still. All Indo-European languages have lost the optative (except rudimentary fragments in Greek), supplemented or conflated with other moods. Cp. ich wäre dann be-reit, I [am] be ready; regularly bei'm [gerundive] Gehen, * ich bin gehen "I am going"; Bei Fuß! (a commando given to dogs). Also cp. "wird gemacht", Eng. "will do".



Do examples of other such words exist? Könnte sein!






share|improve this answer




























  • Not sure whether the expletive (Es ist mir klar) can be considered an unnecessary pronoun. It’s grammatically necessary and it is not a pronoun.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 14:48











  • @Jan it is not a pronoun?

    – vectory
    Sep 11 at 14:58











  • It is only a pronoun when it replaces a noun. German knows two different types of expletive es: compare Es wird gefeiert and Es regnet. The difference is obvious when you add a locator: Hier wird gefeiert versus hier regnet es. In the first case, es cannot be a pronoun because it is absolutely impossible for it to replace anything; it is simply there to fill a syntactic void. In the second case, you can argue for it to be pronoun-like because it is actually the sentence subject but it really just is filling a grammatical void there too.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:28











  • @Jan there are different opinions about how to describe such usages of it, see impersonal verbs which is not all the same thing but does mention the issue. Needles to say I do not subscribe to the idea of a dummy pronoun which strikes me as a dumbed down description for elementary scools. Ironically "regnen" is described as an impersonal verb anyhow but not without difficulty. Naively I'd say Hier wird es [das Fest] gefeiert, es [Sylvester] wird gefeiert does make sense (especially in your Rheinische Mundart), but not in other cases.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:29












  • I mean, the indefinite pronoun has to come from regular usage, ultimately.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:31












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "253"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54314%2fleaving-out-pronouns-in-informal-conversation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9



















A number of languages allow omitting pronouns (even) in formal speech and writing. Spanish is one of them, although the pattern is restricted to subject pronouns.



German, like English, is generally "non-pronoun-dropping". However, in informal and colloquial speech, it's not uncommon in either language. Some often-heard examples:




Kann sein. (Could be.)

Weiß nicht. (Don't know.)

Mach ich. (Will do.)




Linguistically, these omissions are ellipses (Ellipsen). As such, they are not governed by a firm grammatical rule, but by speech register and style. The complete phrases would be:




Es kann [so] sein. (It could be [so].)

Ich weiß nicht. (I don't know.)

Das mache ich. (I will do that.)




In an informal context, it is perfectly normal and not unusual to leave out these pronouns. And although I cannot provide a general rule (as per the above), this is not just true for these examples, but for the majority of ordinary phrases where the sentence's leading subject or object can be easily inferred from context. In fact, Wikipedia, in the article linked first, observes (albeit without a reference):




Colloquial and dialectal German, unlike the standard language, are also partially pro-drop; they typically allow deletion of the subject pronoun in main clauses without inversion, but not otherwise.




In the question's second example, I would consider the "half-hearted" introduction borderline impolite, unless it was immediately preceded by other people introducing themselves using the full sentence ("Ich bin …"). Simply because its demonstrated brevity runs counter to common courtesy. The third example, the line from the song, is however neither informal nor colloquial in style. The elliptical usage there lends a decidedly poetic touch to the lyrics.






share|improve this answer




























  • I must agree. Especially in cases where the verb form clearly and unambiguously designates the subject pronoun, it is not that uncommon to leave it out in colloquial speech. For example in "X bin ..:", the only gramatically valid value for X is ich and it can therefore be omitted without loss of meaning.

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 16:48











  • This is a very helpful response, vielen Dank!

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 20:31











  • This is the best answer, in my opinion. It accepts that these ellipses are often heard.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:43











  • I disagree with the interpretation of that lyrics line as lending a poetic subtext... to me, that feels perfectly informal/colloquial. It might be that it's a local thing here in the Ruhr area, but to me it's a perfectly normal informal response to a question like "Why is your leg in a cast?" ("Wieso haste nen Gips am Bein?" -- "Bin zu tief gefallen.")

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:21












  • @JohnHennig I'm aware of the context, and in the context of that song that line does fit into the poetic style of the song. But I would not go as far as saying that that line is the source of the songs poetic touch (which would be my interpretation of your last sentence, and my interpretation might be flawed, of course). To me, that line in itself does not have nor invoke a poetic touch, simply because I would use it without afterthought in colloquial conversation.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 12:57
















9



















A number of languages allow omitting pronouns (even) in formal speech and writing. Spanish is one of them, although the pattern is restricted to subject pronouns.



German, like English, is generally "non-pronoun-dropping". However, in informal and colloquial speech, it's not uncommon in either language. Some often-heard examples:




Kann sein. (Could be.)

Weiß nicht. (Don't know.)

Mach ich. (Will do.)




Linguistically, these omissions are ellipses (Ellipsen). As such, they are not governed by a firm grammatical rule, but by speech register and style. The complete phrases would be:




Es kann [so] sein. (It could be [so].)

Ich weiß nicht. (I don't know.)

Das mache ich. (I will do that.)




In an informal context, it is perfectly normal and not unusual to leave out these pronouns. And although I cannot provide a general rule (as per the above), this is not just true for these examples, but for the majority of ordinary phrases where the sentence's leading subject or object can be easily inferred from context. In fact, Wikipedia, in the article linked first, observes (albeit without a reference):




Colloquial and dialectal German, unlike the standard language, are also partially pro-drop; they typically allow deletion of the subject pronoun in main clauses without inversion, but not otherwise.




In the question's second example, I would consider the "half-hearted" introduction borderline impolite, unless it was immediately preceded by other people introducing themselves using the full sentence ("Ich bin …"). Simply because its demonstrated brevity runs counter to common courtesy. The third example, the line from the song, is however neither informal nor colloquial in style. The elliptical usage there lends a decidedly poetic touch to the lyrics.






share|improve this answer




























  • I must agree. Especially in cases where the verb form clearly and unambiguously designates the subject pronoun, it is not that uncommon to leave it out in colloquial speech. For example in "X bin ..:", the only gramatically valid value for X is ich and it can therefore be omitted without loss of meaning.

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 16:48











  • This is a very helpful response, vielen Dank!

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 20:31











  • This is the best answer, in my opinion. It accepts that these ellipses are often heard.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:43











  • I disagree with the interpretation of that lyrics line as lending a poetic subtext... to me, that feels perfectly informal/colloquial. It might be that it's a local thing here in the Ruhr area, but to me it's a perfectly normal informal response to a question like "Why is your leg in a cast?" ("Wieso haste nen Gips am Bein?" -- "Bin zu tief gefallen.")

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:21












  • @JohnHennig I'm aware of the context, and in the context of that song that line does fit into the poetic style of the song. But I would not go as far as saying that that line is the source of the songs poetic touch (which would be my interpretation of your last sentence, and my interpretation might be flawed, of course). To me, that line in itself does not have nor invoke a poetic touch, simply because I would use it without afterthought in colloquial conversation.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 12:57














9















9











9









A number of languages allow omitting pronouns (even) in formal speech and writing. Spanish is one of them, although the pattern is restricted to subject pronouns.



German, like English, is generally "non-pronoun-dropping". However, in informal and colloquial speech, it's not uncommon in either language. Some often-heard examples:




Kann sein. (Could be.)

Weiß nicht. (Don't know.)

Mach ich. (Will do.)




Linguistically, these omissions are ellipses (Ellipsen). As such, they are not governed by a firm grammatical rule, but by speech register and style. The complete phrases would be:




Es kann [so] sein. (It could be [so].)

Ich weiß nicht. (I don't know.)

Das mache ich. (I will do that.)




In an informal context, it is perfectly normal and not unusual to leave out these pronouns. And although I cannot provide a general rule (as per the above), this is not just true for these examples, but for the majority of ordinary phrases where the sentence's leading subject or object can be easily inferred from context. In fact, Wikipedia, in the article linked first, observes (albeit without a reference):




Colloquial and dialectal German, unlike the standard language, are also partially pro-drop; they typically allow deletion of the subject pronoun in main clauses without inversion, but not otherwise.




In the question's second example, I would consider the "half-hearted" introduction borderline impolite, unless it was immediately preceded by other people introducing themselves using the full sentence ("Ich bin …"). Simply because its demonstrated brevity runs counter to common courtesy. The third example, the line from the song, is however neither informal nor colloquial in style. The elliptical usage there lends a decidedly poetic touch to the lyrics.






share|improve this answer
















A number of languages allow omitting pronouns (even) in formal speech and writing. Spanish is one of them, although the pattern is restricted to subject pronouns.



German, like English, is generally "non-pronoun-dropping". However, in informal and colloquial speech, it's not uncommon in either language. Some often-heard examples:




Kann sein. (Could be.)

Weiß nicht. (Don't know.)

Mach ich. (Will do.)




Linguistically, these omissions are ellipses (Ellipsen). As such, they are not governed by a firm grammatical rule, but by speech register and style. The complete phrases would be:




Es kann [so] sein. (It could be [so].)

Ich weiß nicht. (I don't know.)

Das mache ich. (I will do that.)




In an informal context, it is perfectly normal and not unusual to leave out these pronouns. And although I cannot provide a general rule (as per the above), this is not just true for these examples, but for the majority of ordinary phrases where the sentence's leading subject or object can be easily inferred from context. In fact, Wikipedia, in the article linked first, observes (albeit without a reference):




Colloquial and dialectal German, unlike the standard language, are also partially pro-drop; they typically allow deletion of the subject pronoun in main clauses without inversion, but not otherwise.




In the question's second example, I would consider the "half-hearted" introduction borderline impolite, unless it was immediately preceded by other people introducing themselves using the full sentence ("Ich bin …"). Simply because its demonstrated brevity runs counter to common courtesy. The third example, the line from the song, is however neither informal nor colloquial in style. The elliptical usage there lends a decidedly poetic touch to the lyrics.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited Sep 12 at 9:04

























answered Sep 11 at 16:13









anonanon

36614 bronze badges




36614 bronze badges















  • I must agree. Especially in cases where the verb form clearly and unambiguously designates the subject pronoun, it is not that uncommon to leave it out in colloquial speech. For example in "X bin ..:", the only gramatically valid value for X is ich and it can therefore be omitted without loss of meaning.

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 16:48











  • This is a very helpful response, vielen Dank!

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 20:31











  • This is the best answer, in my opinion. It accepts that these ellipses are often heard.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:43











  • I disagree with the interpretation of that lyrics line as lending a poetic subtext... to me, that feels perfectly informal/colloquial. It might be that it's a local thing here in the Ruhr area, but to me it's a perfectly normal informal response to a question like "Why is your leg in a cast?" ("Wieso haste nen Gips am Bein?" -- "Bin zu tief gefallen.")

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:21












  • @JohnHennig I'm aware of the context, and in the context of that song that line does fit into the poetic style of the song. But I would not go as far as saying that that line is the source of the songs poetic touch (which would be my interpretation of your last sentence, and my interpretation might be flawed, of course). To me, that line in itself does not have nor invoke a poetic touch, simply because I would use it without afterthought in colloquial conversation.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 12:57


















  • I must agree. Especially in cases where the verb form clearly and unambiguously designates the subject pronoun, it is not that uncommon to leave it out in colloquial speech. For example in "X bin ..:", the only gramatically valid value for X is ich and it can therefore be omitted without loss of meaning.

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 16:48











  • This is a very helpful response, vielen Dank!

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 20:31











  • This is the best answer, in my opinion. It accepts that these ellipses are often heard.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:43











  • I disagree with the interpretation of that lyrics line as lending a poetic subtext... to me, that feels perfectly informal/colloquial. It might be that it's a local thing here in the Ruhr area, but to me it's a perfectly normal informal response to a question like "Why is your leg in a cast?" ("Wieso haste nen Gips am Bein?" -- "Bin zu tief gefallen.")

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:21












  • @JohnHennig I'm aware of the context, and in the context of that song that line does fit into the poetic style of the song. But I would not go as far as saying that that line is the source of the songs poetic touch (which would be my interpretation of your last sentence, and my interpretation might be flawed, of course). To me, that line in itself does not have nor invoke a poetic touch, simply because I would use it without afterthought in colloquial conversation.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 12:57

















I must agree. Especially in cases where the verb form clearly and unambiguously designates the subject pronoun, it is not that uncommon to leave it out in colloquial speech. For example in "X bin ..:", the only gramatically valid value for X is ich and it can therefore be omitted without loss of meaning.

– jarnbjo
Sep 11 at 16:48





I must agree. Especially in cases where the verb form clearly and unambiguously designates the subject pronoun, it is not that uncommon to leave it out in colloquial speech. For example in "X bin ..:", the only gramatically valid value for X is ich and it can therefore be omitted without loss of meaning.

– jarnbjo
Sep 11 at 16:48













This is a very helpful response, vielen Dank!

– theupandup
Sep 11 at 20:31





This is a very helpful response, vielen Dank!

– theupandup
Sep 11 at 20:31













This is the best answer, in my opinion. It accepts that these ellipses are often heard.

– TonyK
Sep 11 at 22:43





This is the best answer, in my opinion. It accepts that these ellipses are often heard.

– TonyK
Sep 11 at 22:43













I disagree with the interpretation of that lyrics line as lending a poetic subtext... to me, that feels perfectly informal/colloquial. It might be that it's a local thing here in the Ruhr area, but to me it's a perfectly normal informal response to a question like "Why is your leg in a cast?" ("Wieso haste nen Gips am Bein?" -- "Bin zu tief gefallen.")

– orithena
Sep 12 at 9:21






I disagree with the interpretation of that lyrics line as lending a poetic subtext... to me, that feels perfectly informal/colloquial. It might be that it's a local thing here in the Ruhr area, but to me it's a perfectly normal informal response to a question like "Why is your leg in a cast?" ("Wieso haste nen Gips am Bein?" -- "Bin zu tief gefallen.")

– orithena
Sep 12 at 9:21














@JohnHennig I'm aware of the context, and in the context of that song that line does fit into the poetic style of the song. But I would not go as far as saying that that line is the source of the songs poetic touch (which would be my interpretation of your last sentence, and my interpretation might be flawed, of course). To me, that line in itself does not have nor invoke a poetic touch, simply because I would use it without afterthought in colloquial conversation.

– orithena
Sep 12 at 12:57






@JohnHennig I'm aware of the context, and in the context of that song that line does fit into the poetic style of the song. But I would not go as far as saying that that line is the source of the songs poetic touch (which would be my interpretation of your last sentence, and my interpretation might be flawed, of course). To me, that line in itself does not have nor invoke a poetic touch, simply because I would use it without afterthought in colloquial conversation.

– orithena
Sep 12 at 12:57














5



















A recommended read on the topic is Vorfeld-Analepse bei Aussagen. It's rather long and difficult, but covers a lot of ground. Custom requires that I mention at least a few pertinent points.



  • It is not wise to conceive of this as dropping pronouns. It's about the Vorfeld being left empty in declarative sentences. In contrast, in a pro-drop language such as Italian, the subject pronoun is optional in interrogatives as well: Capisci?



  • That analepsis is limited to the Vorfeld is shown by examples such as the following.




    Und was sagst du zu den neuen Plänen der Regierung?

    Kenn' ich noch gar nicht.

    *Ich kenn' noch gar nicht.





  • In an example like the following, the dropped element seems to be da, which is not a pronoun and itself refers to drauf, which stands in for a prepositional phrase.




    A: Was denkst du über das Fest?

    B: Freu' ich mich riesig drauf.





  • I find bin (der) David impossible and the following example seems to support this. The idea is that rhematic (new) information cannot be left out.




    Wer hat hier geraucht?

    *Hab' geraucht.





  • In contrast to pro-drop, these kind of sentences require context to work, although the context can be extralinguistic.




    Macht nichts [mit Verweis auf ein vorgefallenes Malheur]








share|improve this answer























  • 1





    For anyone wondering: "Als Analepse wird die Auslassung von Satzbestandteilen bezeichnet, die - anders als bei Ellipsen - nicht aus der Vorstellung, sondern eindeutig aus dem Kontext zu rekonstruieren sind" (taken from the linked reference).

    – phipsgabler
    Sep 12 at 6:57















5



















A recommended read on the topic is Vorfeld-Analepse bei Aussagen. It's rather long and difficult, but covers a lot of ground. Custom requires that I mention at least a few pertinent points.



  • It is not wise to conceive of this as dropping pronouns. It's about the Vorfeld being left empty in declarative sentences. In contrast, in a pro-drop language such as Italian, the subject pronoun is optional in interrogatives as well: Capisci?



  • That analepsis is limited to the Vorfeld is shown by examples such as the following.




    Und was sagst du zu den neuen Plänen der Regierung?

    Kenn' ich noch gar nicht.

    *Ich kenn' noch gar nicht.





  • In an example like the following, the dropped element seems to be da, which is not a pronoun and itself refers to drauf, which stands in for a prepositional phrase.




    A: Was denkst du über das Fest?

    B: Freu' ich mich riesig drauf.





  • I find bin (der) David impossible and the following example seems to support this. The idea is that rhematic (new) information cannot be left out.




    Wer hat hier geraucht?

    *Hab' geraucht.





  • In contrast to pro-drop, these kind of sentences require context to work, although the context can be extralinguistic.




    Macht nichts [mit Verweis auf ein vorgefallenes Malheur]








share|improve this answer























  • 1





    For anyone wondering: "Als Analepse wird die Auslassung von Satzbestandteilen bezeichnet, die - anders als bei Ellipsen - nicht aus der Vorstellung, sondern eindeutig aus dem Kontext zu rekonstruieren sind" (taken from the linked reference).

    – phipsgabler
    Sep 12 at 6:57













5















5











5









A recommended read on the topic is Vorfeld-Analepse bei Aussagen. It's rather long and difficult, but covers a lot of ground. Custom requires that I mention at least a few pertinent points.



  • It is not wise to conceive of this as dropping pronouns. It's about the Vorfeld being left empty in declarative sentences. In contrast, in a pro-drop language such as Italian, the subject pronoun is optional in interrogatives as well: Capisci?



  • That analepsis is limited to the Vorfeld is shown by examples such as the following.




    Und was sagst du zu den neuen Plänen der Regierung?

    Kenn' ich noch gar nicht.

    *Ich kenn' noch gar nicht.





  • In an example like the following, the dropped element seems to be da, which is not a pronoun and itself refers to drauf, which stands in for a prepositional phrase.




    A: Was denkst du über das Fest?

    B: Freu' ich mich riesig drauf.





  • I find bin (der) David impossible and the following example seems to support this. The idea is that rhematic (new) information cannot be left out.




    Wer hat hier geraucht?

    *Hab' geraucht.





  • In contrast to pro-drop, these kind of sentences require context to work, although the context can be extralinguistic.




    Macht nichts [mit Verweis auf ein vorgefallenes Malheur]








share|improve this answer
















A recommended read on the topic is Vorfeld-Analepse bei Aussagen. It's rather long and difficult, but covers a lot of ground. Custom requires that I mention at least a few pertinent points.



  • It is not wise to conceive of this as dropping pronouns. It's about the Vorfeld being left empty in declarative sentences. In contrast, in a pro-drop language such as Italian, the subject pronoun is optional in interrogatives as well: Capisci?



  • That analepsis is limited to the Vorfeld is shown by examples such as the following.




    Und was sagst du zu den neuen Plänen der Regierung?

    Kenn' ich noch gar nicht.

    *Ich kenn' noch gar nicht.





  • In an example like the following, the dropped element seems to be da, which is not a pronoun and itself refers to drauf, which stands in for a prepositional phrase.




    A: Was denkst du über das Fest?

    B: Freu' ich mich riesig drauf.





  • I find bin (der) David impossible and the following example seems to support this. The idea is that rhematic (new) information cannot be left out.




    Wer hat hier geraucht?

    *Hab' geraucht.





  • In contrast to pro-drop, these kind of sentences require context to work, although the context can be extralinguistic.




    Macht nichts [mit Verweis auf ein vorgefallenes Malheur]









share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited Sep 12 at 10:12

























answered Sep 11 at 21:04









David VogtDavid Vogt

11k1 gold badge13 silver badges46 bronze badges




11k1 gold badge13 silver badges46 bronze badges










  • 1





    For anyone wondering: "Als Analepse wird die Auslassung von Satzbestandteilen bezeichnet, die - anders als bei Ellipsen - nicht aus der Vorstellung, sondern eindeutig aus dem Kontext zu rekonstruieren sind" (taken from the linked reference).

    – phipsgabler
    Sep 12 at 6:57












  • 1





    For anyone wondering: "Als Analepse wird die Auslassung von Satzbestandteilen bezeichnet, die - anders als bei Ellipsen - nicht aus der Vorstellung, sondern eindeutig aus dem Kontext zu rekonstruieren sind" (taken from the linked reference).

    – phipsgabler
    Sep 12 at 6:57







1




1





For anyone wondering: "Als Analepse wird die Auslassung von Satzbestandteilen bezeichnet, die - anders als bei Ellipsen - nicht aus der Vorstellung, sondern eindeutig aus dem Kontext zu rekonstruieren sind" (taken from the linked reference).

– phipsgabler
Sep 12 at 6:57





For anyone wondering: "Als Analepse wird die Auslassung von Satzbestandteilen bezeichnet, die - anders als bei Ellipsen - nicht aus der Vorstellung, sondern eindeutig aus dem Kontext zu rekonstruieren sind" (taken from the linked reference).

– phipsgabler
Sep 12 at 6:57











3



















This is very uncommon in German and I’m not even sure off the top of my head where it would be heard. While personal pronouns can be reduced a lot (the furthest would probably be Bavarian Wenn’st mogst, if you want, where the st on wenn is essentially what replaces du) they are practically always there in one way or another.



Word order is very flexible in German though, so a personal pronoun may not necessarily be anywhere close to the beginning of a sentence – although the soft ordering rules usually suggest they should be somewhere close-ish.




Edit to include your examples:



Läuft as an answer to ‘how are you’ has almost taken on a life of itself and it might be considered a fixed word rather than a full sentence.



Bin (der) Jan (Southerners like me would include an article, Northerners are more likely not to): Yes, possible, and there are a couple of other occasions where a short answer might be given without a personal pronoun but to me this case gives a vibe of ‘here’s your answer, I’ve been polite, now leave me in peace’. A similar example might be if you fell over and are asked if you’re fine you might answer ‘Geht schon wieder’ – the shortest possible reply. It’s not a very common thing and it only applies to rare cases.



As for music, poetry and literature: they follow their own rules and don’t necessarily form full sentences if it sounds better in another way.






share|improve this answer























  • 1





    good to know, thanks. I figured it's very rare since I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples in years of learning. but I'm less acquainted to colloquial speech and don't want to accidentally over-generalize rare grammatical edge cases.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:42











  • Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob es ein Wegfall vom Pronomen oder "nur" ein Zusammenschmelzen von Verb und Pronomen, aber gerade in der Fragestellung ist in vielen Dialekten anscheinend nichts mehr vom Pronomen übrig. Z.B. Bairisch: "Seids ganga?" (seid ihr gegangen) oder "Habds gessn?" (habt ihr gegessen).

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 15:07











  • @jarnbjo das s am Ende von seids oder habts kann man aber durchaus als Verkürzung von ees also ihr auffassen; mehr noch als das st in wennst magst.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:29






  • 1





    Very uncommon? What planet do you live on? I heard them all the time when I lived in Munich.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:45






  • 1





    @theupandup No, it's rather common in colloquial speech. I can vouch for the Ruhr area, TonyK confirms it for Munich, BusyAnt for Saxony ... and my knowledge of low german also points towards it being rather common. But I agree that you would only acquaint yourself with it when you live in germany and have a circle of friends.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:30















3



















This is very uncommon in German and I’m not even sure off the top of my head where it would be heard. While personal pronouns can be reduced a lot (the furthest would probably be Bavarian Wenn’st mogst, if you want, where the st on wenn is essentially what replaces du) they are practically always there in one way or another.



Word order is very flexible in German though, so a personal pronoun may not necessarily be anywhere close to the beginning of a sentence – although the soft ordering rules usually suggest they should be somewhere close-ish.




Edit to include your examples:



Läuft as an answer to ‘how are you’ has almost taken on a life of itself and it might be considered a fixed word rather than a full sentence.



Bin (der) Jan (Southerners like me would include an article, Northerners are more likely not to): Yes, possible, and there are a couple of other occasions where a short answer might be given without a personal pronoun but to me this case gives a vibe of ‘here’s your answer, I’ve been polite, now leave me in peace’. A similar example might be if you fell over and are asked if you’re fine you might answer ‘Geht schon wieder’ – the shortest possible reply. It’s not a very common thing and it only applies to rare cases.



As for music, poetry and literature: they follow their own rules and don’t necessarily form full sentences if it sounds better in another way.






share|improve this answer























  • 1





    good to know, thanks. I figured it's very rare since I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples in years of learning. but I'm less acquainted to colloquial speech and don't want to accidentally over-generalize rare grammatical edge cases.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:42











  • Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob es ein Wegfall vom Pronomen oder "nur" ein Zusammenschmelzen von Verb und Pronomen, aber gerade in der Fragestellung ist in vielen Dialekten anscheinend nichts mehr vom Pronomen übrig. Z.B. Bairisch: "Seids ganga?" (seid ihr gegangen) oder "Habds gessn?" (habt ihr gegessen).

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 15:07











  • @jarnbjo das s am Ende von seids oder habts kann man aber durchaus als Verkürzung von ees also ihr auffassen; mehr noch als das st in wennst magst.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:29






  • 1





    Very uncommon? What planet do you live on? I heard them all the time when I lived in Munich.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:45






  • 1





    @theupandup No, it's rather common in colloquial speech. I can vouch for the Ruhr area, TonyK confirms it for Munich, BusyAnt for Saxony ... and my knowledge of low german also points towards it being rather common. But I agree that you would only acquaint yourself with it when you live in germany and have a circle of friends.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:30













3















3











3









This is very uncommon in German and I’m not even sure off the top of my head where it would be heard. While personal pronouns can be reduced a lot (the furthest would probably be Bavarian Wenn’st mogst, if you want, where the st on wenn is essentially what replaces du) they are practically always there in one way or another.



Word order is very flexible in German though, so a personal pronoun may not necessarily be anywhere close to the beginning of a sentence – although the soft ordering rules usually suggest they should be somewhere close-ish.




Edit to include your examples:



Läuft as an answer to ‘how are you’ has almost taken on a life of itself and it might be considered a fixed word rather than a full sentence.



Bin (der) Jan (Southerners like me would include an article, Northerners are more likely not to): Yes, possible, and there are a couple of other occasions where a short answer might be given without a personal pronoun but to me this case gives a vibe of ‘here’s your answer, I’ve been polite, now leave me in peace’. A similar example might be if you fell over and are asked if you’re fine you might answer ‘Geht schon wieder’ – the shortest possible reply. It’s not a very common thing and it only applies to rare cases.



As for music, poetry and literature: they follow their own rules and don’t necessarily form full sentences if it sounds better in another way.






share|improve this answer
















This is very uncommon in German and I’m not even sure off the top of my head where it would be heard. While personal pronouns can be reduced a lot (the furthest would probably be Bavarian Wenn’st mogst, if you want, where the st on wenn is essentially what replaces du) they are practically always there in one way or another.



Word order is very flexible in German though, so a personal pronoun may not necessarily be anywhere close to the beginning of a sentence – although the soft ordering rules usually suggest they should be somewhere close-ish.




Edit to include your examples:



Läuft as an answer to ‘how are you’ has almost taken on a life of itself and it might be considered a fixed word rather than a full sentence.



Bin (der) Jan (Southerners like me would include an article, Northerners are more likely not to): Yes, possible, and there are a couple of other occasions where a short answer might be given without a personal pronoun but to me this case gives a vibe of ‘here’s your answer, I’ve been polite, now leave me in peace’. A similar example might be if you fell over and are asked if you’re fine you might answer ‘Geht schon wieder’ – the shortest possible reply. It’s not a very common thing and it only applies to rare cases.



As for music, poetry and literature: they follow their own rules and don’t necessarily form full sentences if it sounds better in another way.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited Sep 11 at 13:52

























answered Sep 11 at 13:05









JanJan

34.6k3 gold badges55 silver badges141 bronze badges




34.6k3 gold badges55 silver badges141 bronze badges










  • 1





    good to know, thanks. I figured it's very rare since I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples in years of learning. but I'm less acquainted to colloquial speech and don't want to accidentally over-generalize rare grammatical edge cases.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:42











  • Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob es ein Wegfall vom Pronomen oder "nur" ein Zusammenschmelzen von Verb und Pronomen, aber gerade in der Fragestellung ist in vielen Dialekten anscheinend nichts mehr vom Pronomen übrig. Z.B. Bairisch: "Seids ganga?" (seid ihr gegangen) oder "Habds gessn?" (habt ihr gegessen).

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 15:07











  • @jarnbjo das s am Ende von seids oder habts kann man aber durchaus als Verkürzung von ees also ihr auffassen; mehr noch als das st in wennst magst.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:29






  • 1





    Very uncommon? What planet do you live on? I heard them all the time when I lived in Munich.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:45






  • 1





    @theupandup No, it's rather common in colloquial speech. I can vouch for the Ruhr area, TonyK confirms it for Munich, BusyAnt for Saxony ... and my knowledge of low german also points towards it being rather common. But I agree that you would only acquaint yourself with it when you live in germany and have a circle of friends.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:30












  • 1





    good to know, thanks. I figured it's very rare since I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples in years of learning. but I'm less acquainted to colloquial speech and don't want to accidentally over-generalize rare grammatical edge cases.

    – theupandup
    Sep 11 at 13:42











  • Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob es ein Wegfall vom Pronomen oder "nur" ein Zusammenschmelzen von Verb und Pronomen, aber gerade in der Fragestellung ist in vielen Dialekten anscheinend nichts mehr vom Pronomen übrig. Z.B. Bairisch: "Seids ganga?" (seid ihr gegangen) oder "Habds gessn?" (habt ihr gegessen).

    – jarnbjo
    Sep 11 at 15:07











  • @jarnbjo das s am Ende von seids oder habts kann man aber durchaus als Verkürzung von ees also ihr auffassen; mehr noch als das st in wennst magst.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:29






  • 1





    Very uncommon? What planet do you live on? I heard them all the time when I lived in Munich.

    – TonyK
    Sep 11 at 22:45






  • 1





    @theupandup No, it's rather common in colloquial speech. I can vouch for the Ruhr area, TonyK confirms it for Munich, BusyAnt for Saxony ... and my knowledge of low german also points towards it being rather common. But I agree that you would only acquaint yourself with it when you live in germany and have a circle of friends.

    – orithena
    Sep 12 at 9:30







1




1





good to know, thanks. I figured it's very rare since I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples in years of learning. but I'm less acquainted to colloquial speech and don't want to accidentally over-generalize rare grammatical edge cases.

– theupandup
Sep 11 at 13:42





good to know, thanks. I figured it's very rare since I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples in years of learning. but I'm less acquainted to colloquial speech and don't want to accidentally over-generalize rare grammatical edge cases.

– theupandup
Sep 11 at 13:42













Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob es ein Wegfall vom Pronomen oder "nur" ein Zusammenschmelzen von Verb und Pronomen, aber gerade in der Fragestellung ist in vielen Dialekten anscheinend nichts mehr vom Pronomen übrig. Z.B. Bairisch: "Seids ganga?" (seid ihr gegangen) oder "Habds gessn?" (habt ihr gegessen).

– jarnbjo
Sep 11 at 15:07





Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob es ein Wegfall vom Pronomen oder "nur" ein Zusammenschmelzen von Verb und Pronomen, aber gerade in der Fragestellung ist in vielen Dialekten anscheinend nichts mehr vom Pronomen übrig. Z.B. Bairisch: "Seids ganga?" (seid ihr gegangen) oder "Habds gessn?" (habt ihr gegessen).

– jarnbjo
Sep 11 at 15:07













@jarnbjo das s am Ende von seids oder habts kann man aber durchaus als Verkürzung von ees also ihr auffassen; mehr noch als das st in wennst magst.

– Jan
Sep 11 at 15:29





@jarnbjo das s am Ende von seids oder habts kann man aber durchaus als Verkürzung von ees also ihr auffassen; mehr noch als das st in wennst magst.

– Jan
Sep 11 at 15:29




1




1





Very uncommon? What planet do you live on? I heard them all the time when I lived in Munich.

– TonyK
Sep 11 at 22:45





Very uncommon? What planet do you live on? I heard them all the time when I lived in Munich.

– TonyK
Sep 11 at 22:45




1




1





@theupandup No, it's rather common in colloquial speech. I can vouch for the Ruhr area, TonyK confirms it for Munich, BusyAnt for Saxony ... and my knowledge of low german also points towards it being rather common. But I agree that you would only acquaint yourself with it when you live in germany and have a circle of friends.

– orithena
Sep 12 at 9:30





@theupandup No, it's rather common in colloquial speech. I can vouch for the Ruhr area, TonyK confirms it for Munich, BusyAnt for Saxony ... and my knowledge of low german also points towards it being rather common. But I agree that you would only acquaint yourself with it when you live in germany and have a circle of friends.

– orithena
Sep 12 at 9:30











2



















This is called pro-drop and German is not called a pro-drop language. Quite the opposite, we even add a pronoun when it's not needed at all, Es ist mir klar, "Mir ist klar das" (Mir ist klar, dass "das" wird so nicht mehr verstanden), "Es regnet", where Spanish for example uses just a single word for the later.



Anyway, it would be deemed higly incorrect to say "* Will spielen!".



The exception is perhaps "Bin da, wer noch", as known for example from the lovely show Die Dinos, "Bin schon da", "Bin mir nicht sicher", etc. This could be explained as a special exception, if bin was a particularly strong verb, reflecting a preverbal root akin to "bei", "be-come". I'm not sure how this related to certain moods like the optative mood (na los, lass losgehen "let's go"). The imperative mood does not require a pronoun, still. All Indo-European languages have lost the optative (except rudimentary fragments in Greek), supplemented or conflated with other moods. Cp. ich wäre dann be-reit, I [am] be ready; regularly bei'm [gerundive] Gehen, * ich bin gehen "I am going"; Bei Fuß! (a commando given to dogs). Also cp. "wird gemacht", Eng. "will do".



Do examples of other such words exist? Könnte sein!






share|improve this answer




























  • Not sure whether the expletive (Es ist mir klar) can be considered an unnecessary pronoun. It’s grammatically necessary and it is not a pronoun.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 14:48











  • @Jan it is not a pronoun?

    – vectory
    Sep 11 at 14:58











  • It is only a pronoun when it replaces a noun. German knows two different types of expletive es: compare Es wird gefeiert and Es regnet. The difference is obvious when you add a locator: Hier wird gefeiert versus hier regnet es. In the first case, es cannot be a pronoun because it is absolutely impossible for it to replace anything; it is simply there to fill a syntactic void. In the second case, you can argue for it to be pronoun-like because it is actually the sentence subject but it really just is filling a grammatical void there too.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:28











  • @Jan there are different opinions about how to describe such usages of it, see impersonal verbs which is not all the same thing but does mention the issue. Needles to say I do not subscribe to the idea of a dummy pronoun which strikes me as a dumbed down description for elementary scools. Ironically "regnen" is described as an impersonal verb anyhow but not without difficulty. Naively I'd say Hier wird es [das Fest] gefeiert, es [Sylvester] wird gefeiert does make sense (especially in your Rheinische Mundart), but not in other cases.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:29












  • I mean, the indefinite pronoun has to come from regular usage, ultimately.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:31















2



















This is called pro-drop and German is not called a pro-drop language. Quite the opposite, we even add a pronoun when it's not needed at all, Es ist mir klar, "Mir ist klar das" (Mir ist klar, dass "das" wird so nicht mehr verstanden), "Es regnet", where Spanish for example uses just a single word for the later.



Anyway, it would be deemed higly incorrect to say "* Will spielen!".



The exception is perhaps "Bin da, wer noch", as known for example from the lovely show Die Dinos, "Bin schon da", "Bin mir nicht sicher", etc. This could be explained as a special exception, if bin was a particularly strong verb, reflecting a preverbal root akin to "bei", "be-come". I'm not sure how this related to certain moods like the optative mood (na los, lass losgehen "let's go"). The imperative mood does not require a pronoun, still. All Indo-European languages have lost the optative (except rudimentary fragments in Greek), supplemented or conflated with other moods. Cp. ich wäre dann be-reit, I [am] be ready; regularly bei'm [gerundive] Gehen, * ich bin gehen "I am going"; Bei Fuß! (a commando given to dogs). Also cp. "wird gemacht", Eng. "will do".



Do examples of other such words exist? Könnte sein!






share|improve this answer




























  • Not sure whether the expletive (Es ist mir klar) can be considered an unnecessary pronoun. It’s grammatically necessary and it is not a pronoun.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 14:48











  • @Jan it is not a pronoun?

    – vectory
    Sep 11 at 14:58











  • It is only a pronoun when it replaces a noun. German knows two different types of expletive es: compare Es wird gefeiert and Es regnet. The difference is obvious when you add a locator: Hier wird gefeiert versus hier regnet es. In the first case, es cannot be a pronoun because it is absolutely impossible for it to replace anything; it is simply there to fill a syntactic void. In the second case, you can argue for it to be pronoun-like because it is actually the sentence subject but it really just is filling a grammatical void there too.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:28











  • @Jan there are different opinions about how to describe such usages of it, see impersonal verbs which is not all the same thing but does mention the issue. Needles to say I do not subscribe to the idea of a dummy pronoun which strikes me as a dumbed down description for elementary scools. Ironically "regnen" is described as an impersonal verb anyhow but not without difficulty. Naively I'd say Hier wird es [das Fest] gefeiert, es [Sylvester] wird gefeiert does make sense (especially in your Rheinische Mundart), but not in other cases.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:29












  • I mean, the indefinite pronoun has to come from regular usage, ultimately.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:31













2















2











2









This is called pro-drop and German is not called a pro-drop language. Quite the opposite, we even add a pronoun when it's not needed at all, Es ist mir klar, "Mir ist klar das" (Mir ist klar, dass "das" wird so nicht mehr verstanden), "Es regnet", where Spanish for example uses just a single word for the later.



Anyway, it would be deemed higly incorrect to say "* Will spielen!".



The exception is perhaps "Bin da, wer noch", as known for example from the lovely show Die Dinos, "Bin schon da", "Bin mir nicht sicher", etc. This could be explained as a special exception, if bin was a particularly strong verb, reflecting a preverbal root akin to "bei", "be-come". I'm not sure how this related to certain moods like the optative mood (na los, lass losgehen "let's go"). The imperative mood does not require a pronoun, still. All Indo-European languages have lost the optative (except rudimentary fragments in Greek), supplemented or conflated with other moods. Cp. ich wäre dann be-reit, I [am] be ready; regularly bei'm [gerundive] Gehen, * ich bin gehen "I am going"; Bei Fuß! (a commando given to dogs). Also cp. "wird gemacht", Eng. "will do".



Do examples of other such words exist? Könnte sein!






share|improve this answer
















This is called pro-drop and German is not called a pro-drop language. Quite the opposite, we even add a pronoun when it's not needed at all, Es ist mir klar, "Mir ist klar das" (Mir ist klar, dass "das" wird so nicht mehr verstanden), "Es regnet", where Spanish for example uses just a single word for the later.



Anyway, it would be deemed higly incorrect to say "* Will spielen!".



The exception is perhaps "Bin da, wer noch", as known for example from the lovely show Die Dinos, "Bin schon da", "Bin mir nicht sicher", etc. This could be explained as a special exception, if bin was a particularly strong verb, reflecting a preverbal root akin to "bei", "be-come". I'm not sure how this related to certain moods like the optative mood (na los, lass losgehen "let's go"). The imperative mood does not require a pronoun, still. All Indo-European languages have lost the optative (except rudimentary fragments in Greek), supplemented or conflated with other moods. Cp. ich wäre dann be-reit, I [am] be ready; regularly bei'm [gerundive] Gehen, * ich bin gehen "I am going"; Bei Fuß! (a commando given to dogs). Also cp. "wird gemacht", Eng. "will do".



Do examples of other such words exist? Könnte sein!







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited Sep 12 at 17:41

























answered Sep 11 at 14:39









vectoryvectory

1,19912 bronze badges




1,19912 bronze badges















  • Not sure whether the expletive (Es ist mir klar) can be considered an unnecessary pronoun. It’s grammatically necessary and it is not a pronoun.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 14:48











  • @Jan it is not a pronoun?

    – vectory
    Sep 11 at 14:58











  • It is only a pronoun when it replaces a noun. German knows two different types of expletive es: compare Es wird gefeiert and Es regnet. The difference is obvious when you add a locator: Hier wird gefeiert versus hier regnet es. In the first case, es cannot be a pronoun because it is absolutely impossible for it to replace anything; it is simply there to fill a syntactic void. In the second case, you can argue for it to be pronoun-like because it is actually the sentence subject but it really just is filling a grammatical void there too.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:28











  • @Jan there are different opinions about how to describe such usages of it, see impersonal verbs which is not all the same thing but does mention the issue. Needles to say I do not subscribe to the idea of a dummy pronoun which strikes me as a dumbed down description for elementary scools. Ironically "regnen" is described as an impersonal verb anyhow but not without difficulty. Naively I'd say Hier wird es [das Fest] gefeiert, es [Sylvester] wird gefeiert does make sense (especially in your Rheinische Mundart), but not in other cases.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:29












  • I mean, the indefinite pronoun has to come from regular usage, ultimately.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:31

















  • Not sure whether the expletive (Es ist mir klar) can be considered an unnecessary pronoun. It’s grammatically necessary and it is not a pronoun.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 14:48











  • @Jan it is not a pronoun?

    – vectory
    Sep 11 at 14:58











  • It is only a pronoun when it replaces a noun. German knows two different types of expletive es: compare Es wird gefeiert and Es regnet. The difference is obvious when you add a locator: Hier wird gefeiert versus hier regnet es. In the first case, es cannot be a pronoun because it is absolutely impossible for it to replace anything; it is simply there to fill a syntactic void. In the second case, you can argue for it to be pronoun-like because it is actually the sentence subject but it really just is filling a grammatical void there too.

    – Jan
    Sep 11 at 15:28











  • @Jan there are different opinions about how to describe such usages of it, see impersonal verbs which is not all the same thing but does mention the issue. Needles to say I do not subscribe to the idea of a dummy pronoun which strikes me as a dumbed down description for elementary scools. Ironically "regnen" is described as an impersonal verb anyhow but not without difficulty. Naively I'd say Hier wird es [das Fest] gefeiert, es [Sylvester] wird gefeiert does make sense (especially in your Rheinische Mundart), but not in other cases.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:29












  • I mean, the indefinite pronoun has to come from regular usage, ultimately.

    – vectory
    Sep 12 at 17:31
















Not sure whether the expletive (Es ist mir klar) can be considered an unnecessary pronoun. It’s grammatically necessary and it is not a pronoun.

– Jan
Sep 11 at 14:48





Not sure whether the expletive (Es ist mir klar) can be considered an unnecessary pronoun. It’s grammatically necessary and it is not a pronoun.

– Jan
Sep 11 at 14:48













@Jan it is not a pronoun?

– vectory
Sep 11 at 14:58





@Jan it is not a pronoun?

– vectory
Sep 11 at 14:58













It is only a pronoun when it replaces a noun. German knows two different types of expletive es: compare Es wird gefeiert and Es regnet. The difference is obvious when you add a locator: Hier wird gefeiert versus hier regnet es. In the first case, es cannot be a pronoun because it is absolutely impossible for it to replace anything; it is simply there to fill a syntactic void. In the second case, you can argue for it to be pronoun-like because it is actually the sentence subject but it really just is filling a grammatical void there too.

– Jan
Sep 11 at 15:28





It is only a pronoun when it replaces a noun. German knows two different types of expletive es: compare Es wird gefeiert and Es regnet. The difference is obvious when you add a locator: Hier wird gefeiert versus hier regnet es. In the first case, es cannot be a pronoun because it is absolutely impossible for it to replace anything; it is simply there to fill a syntactic void. In the second case, you can argue for it to be pronoun-like because it is actually the sentence subject but it really just is filling a grammatical void there too.

– Jan
Sep 11 at 15:28













@Jan there are different opinions about how to describe such usages of it, see impersonal verbs which is not all the same thing but does mention the issue. Needles to say I do not subscribe to the idea of a dummy pronoun which strikes me as a dumbed down description for elementary scools. Ironically "regnen" is described as an impersonal verb anyhow but not without difficulty. Naively I'd say Hier wird es [das Fest] gefeiert, es [Sylvester] wird gefeiert does make sense (especially in your Rheinische Mundart), but not in other cases.

– vectory
Sep 12 at 17:29






@Jan there are different opinions about how to describe such usages of it, see impersonal verbs which is not all the same thing but does mention the issue. Needles to say I do not subscribe to the idea of a dummy pronoun which strikes me as a dumbed down description for elementary scools. Ironically "regnen" is described as an impersonal verb anyhow but not without difficulty. Naively I'd say Hier wird es [das Fest] gefeiert, es [Sylvester] wird gefeiert does make sense (especially in your Rheinische Mundart), but not in other cases.

– vectory
Sep 12 at 17:29














I mean, the indefinite pronoun has to come from regular usage, ultimately.

– vectory
Sep 12 at 17:31





I mean, the indefinite pronoun has to come from regular usage, ultimately.

– vectory
Sep 12 at 17:31


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54314%2fleaving-out-pronouns-in-informal-conversation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?