Self-deportation of American Citizens from USWhy does the CBP border zone nearly touch Reno, Nevada?Is it legal for American politicians to accept donations from foreigners (non-American citizens)?Is the detainment and deportation of an established illegal alien in Canada lawful?Under US law, do US citizens have to state their citizenship to foreign entities?Can US citizens be denied entry to the US?Can a nation A stop nation B from issuing visas to citizens of nation A?State forbids it's citizens from purchasing firearms in states where firearms are legalWhat countries blindly protect their own citizens from extradition?American citizenship that got lost in the familyICE Detention of US Citizen
Is there any point in adding more than 6 months' runway in savings instead of investing everything after that?
What does Bitcoin policy language offer the developer that Miniscript doesn't? What is the difference between Bitcoin policy language and Miniscript?
delete specific character "[" from a file
How to present boolean options along with selecting exactly 1 of them as "primary"?
Why does nobody understand the grapple rules?
What is a dropfile?
Customize sysctl parameters by user
How do I experimentally measure the surface area of a rock?
Simplify makes Mathematica forget that a matrix is Hermitian
Was there a clearly identifiable "first computer" to use or demonstrate the use of virtual memory?
Completing the square to solve limit problems
Some doubts about SQL Injection examples, how exactly works?
Will an administrator exceed the 401K limit?
Bo Derek in texbook.tex?
Where is a warlock's soul?
Which battle was the most lopsided result in terms of casualties?
Think of the one you can`t see
The Floer Equation is Elliptic
Equality operator does not get defined for a custom spaceship operator implementation in C++20
If Space Shuttle flies "like a brick", why does it need the wings?
Conditionals across a new environment
Is this a pure function?
Doubt on pronunciation of verbs (stressing)
How to write numbers in the form of using foreach or ...?
Self-deportation of American Citizens from US
Why does the CBP border zone nearly touch Reno, Nevada?Is it legal for American politicians to accept donations from foreigners (non-American citizens)?Is the detainment and deportation of an established illegal alien in Canada lawful?Under US law, do US citizens have to state their citizenship to foreign entities?Can US citizens be denied entry to the US?Can a nation A stop nation B from issuing visas to citizens of nation A?State forbids it's citizens from purchasing firearms in states where firearms are legalWhat countries blindly protect their own citizens from extradition?American citizenship that got lost in the familyICE Detention of US Citizen
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
It is conceivable that US citizens detained at CBP will self deport to exit overcrowded CBP detainment facilities avoid lengthy detainments (>20 days). How would a US citizen's self-deportation affect one's ability to cross borders and return home?
Update:
"Food for thought" for responses:
- Upon deportation, why would CBP allow you to re-enter the country with the questioned documents?
- Would CBP not confiscate the questioned documents before deportation?
- Citizen is held incommuncado.
There is a claim that 2 of 3 Americans live in the 100-Mile border zone
patrolled by CBP:
united-states immigration
add a comment
|
It is conceivable that US citizens detained at CBP will self deport to exit overcrowded CBP detainment facilities avoid lengthy detainments (>20 days). How would a US citizen's self-deportation affect one's ability to cross borders and return home?
Update:
"Food for thought" for responses:
- Upon deportation, why would CBP allow you to re-enter the country with the questioned documents?
- Would CBP not confiscate the questioned documents before deportation?
- Citizen is held incommuncado.
There is a claim that 2 of 3 Americans live in the 100-Mile border zone
patrolled by CBP:
united-states immigration
4
Related: the UK forcibly deported citizens to Jamaica, and not all of them have managed to get back. Some died before the abuse could be rectified. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/…
– pjc50
Jul 30 at 12:46
add a comment
|
It is conceivable that US citizens detained at CBP will self deport to exit overcrowded CBP detainment facilities avoid lengthy detainments (>20 days). How would a US citizen's self-deportation affect one's ability to cross borders and return home?
Update:
"Food for thought" for responses:
- Upon deportation, why would CBP allow you to re-enter the country with the questioned documents?
- Would CBP not confiscate the questioned documents before deportation?
- Citizen is held incommuncado.
There is a claim that 2 of 3 Americans live in the 100-Mile border zone
patrolled by CBP:
united-states immigration
It is conceivable that US citizens detained at CBP will self deport to exit overcrowded CBP detainment facilities avoid lengthy detainments (>20 days). How would a US citizen's self-deportation affect one's ability to cross borders and return home?
Update:
"Food for thought" for responses:
- Upon deportation, why would CBP allow you to re-enter the country with the questioned documents?
- Would CBP not confiscate the questioned documents before deportation?
- Citizen is held incommuncado.
There is a claim that 2 of 3 Americans live in the 100-Mile border zone
patrolled by CBP:
united-states immigration
united-states immigration
edited Jul 31 at 12:58
gatorback
asked Jul 29 at 20:04
gatorbackgatorback
7878 silver badges19 bronze badges
7878 silver badges19 bronze badges
4
Related: the UK forcibly deported citizens to Jamaica, and not all of them have managed to get back. Some died before the abuse could be rectified. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/…
– pjc50
Jul 30 at 12:46
add a comment
|
4
Related: the UK forcibly deported citizens to Jamaica, and not all of them have managed to get back. Some died before the abuse could be rectified. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/…
– pjc50
Jul 30 at 12:46
4
4
Related: the UK forcibly deported citizens to Jamaica, and not all of them have managed to get back. Some died before the abuse could be rectified. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/…
– pjc50
Jul 30 at 12:46
Related: the UK forcibly deported citizens to Jamaica, and not all of them have managed to get back. Some died before the abuse could be rectified. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/…
– pjc50
Jul 30 at 12:46
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
They can't take his citizenship...
Since he claims to be a born citizen, he has citizenship by birthright and nothing CBP can do can possibly revoke it.
He can voluntarily renounce his citizenship, but he has to do that through the State Dept. (which CBP is not part of). And that is an elaborate and expensive process that can't even be done inside the United States. If someone could do it merely by entering without papers and asking for a self-deport, lots of expats would save a lot of money - and that's not gonna happen :)
...but they could put him to serious inconvenience
In this particular case, CBP found his documents suspect. Probably because (if it's the case we've seen documented elsewhere) he was with two other people whose entry was illegal, and they had forged documents.
So most likely, if he agreed to self-deport, CBP would use that as prima-facie evidence that he is not a bona-fide citizen, and therefore, that his papers are faked. They certainly will not give fake papers back to someone who has tried to pass them.
So the victim would be obliged to go back to SSA, the state, etc. and re-acquire his identity documents. From outside the country. It's a pretty big chore.
1
The citizen would be deported and have no papers? Yikes!
– gatorback
Jul 30 at 3:57
9
They had forged documents and his mother claimed he was not born in the US.
– chrylis -on strike-
Jul 30 at 6:26
2
Deported to where?
– gerrit
Jul 30 at 11:20
1
@gerrit In this case back to where his mother and sibling were from which was Mexico.
– Dean MacGregor
Jul 30 at 13:40
2
If I were hateful, I would earn some foreign income, pay US tax on it, then sue the Commissioner for the tax back, saying I shouldn't owe it since I am ruled not a citizen. Pull in CBP as a witness and let the judge give them what-for.
– Harper
Jul 30 at 21:28
|
show 8 more comments
He's a citizen; his citizenship can't be taken by ICE or CBP, and he can't legally be kept from returning to the US from Mexico by them. He was offered "self-deportation" because ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him, thinking that his documents were forged or stolen.
He could have "self-deported" in order to simply get out of detention, since it was offered by ICE; but he's a US citizen, so as soon as he was in Mexico, he could simply go to the border and cross with his documents. If CBP kept him from crossing at the border, his lawyer could attest to his citizenship with documents. And any "self-deportation" document he signed could be shown to be meaningless in court, since he's a citizen, and ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him.
15
Also, since he is not a Mexican citizen, Mexico would be under no obligation to allow him to enter their country, and it could deport him to the U.S. if it wished.
– ohwilleke
Jul 30 at 1:28
15
It strikes me that "simply" is probably not the term that applies to a border crossing after you've been deported as a non-citizen. Your biometrics would be on file as a person who has been deported, and it's not clear to me what travel documents you'd have (they presumably won't deport you and hand you your US passport on your way out the door). I'm not saying that you won't get back, but it's unlikely to be a simple process.
– Zach Lipton
Jul 30 at 7:12
6
If a "self-deportation document" incorporates an "admission" that the signatory is not a US citizen, could a US citizen who signs this and later successfully proves his citizenship be guilty of some offense relating to false statements and become the target of a new, ostensibly lawful, detention?
– Will
Jul 30 at 11:07
4
If there was a reasonable suspicion, that Francisco Erwin Galicia was in possession of forged documents, why is it stated that "ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him"?
– Michael J.
Jul 30 at 14:52
4
@MichaelJ. At some point in the three weeks, whatever reasonable suspicion they had ceased to be reasonable. If it had truly been reasonable, they would have described their reasonable suspicion instead of falsely claiming that he never asserted US citizenship. While they have disclosed facts that make some suspicion reasonable, they have not explained why they held him for so long. Also, for a criminal arrest, the standard is probable cause. They have an obligation to establish probable cause by investigating their suspicion. Whether the investigation was sufficient is not apparent.
– phoog
Jul 31 at 11:48
|
show 12 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43279%2fself-deportation-of-american-citizens-from-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
They can't take his citizenship...
Since he claims to be a born citizen, he has citizenship by birthright and nothing CBP can do can possibly revoke it.
He can voluntarily renounce his citizenship, but he has to do that through the State Dept. (which CBP is not part of). And that is an elaborate and expensive process that can't even be done inside the United States. If someone could do it merely by entering without papers and asking for a self-deport, lots of expats would save a lot of money - and that's not gonna happen :)
...but they could put him to serious inconvenience
In this particular case, CBP found his documents suspect. Probably because (if it's the case we've seen documented elsewhere) he was with two other people whose entry was illegal, and they had forged documents.
So most likely, if he agreed to self-deport, CBP would use that as prima-facie evidence that he is not a bona-fide citizen, and therefore, that his papers are faked. They certainly will not give fake papers back to someone who has tried to pass them.
So the victim would be obliged to go back to SSA, the state, etc. and re-acquire his identity documents. From outside the country. It's a pretty big chore.
1
The citizen would be deported and have no papers? Yikes!
– gatorback
Jul 30 at 3:57
9
They had forged documents and his mother claimed he was not born in the US.
– chrylis -on strike-
Jul 30 at 6:26
2
Deported to where?
– gerrit
Jul 30 at 11:20
1
@gerrit In this case back to where his mother and sibling were from which was Mexico.
– Dean MacGregor
Jul 30 at 13:40
2
If I were hateful, I would earn some foreign income, pay US tax on it, then sue the Commissioner for the tax back, saying I shouldn't owe it since I am ruled not a citizen. Pull in CBP as a witness and let the judge give them what-for.
– Harper
Jul 30 at 21:28
|
show 8 more comments
They can't take his citizenship...
Since he claims to be a born citizen, he has citizenship by birthright and nothing CBP can do can possibly revoke it.
He can voluntarily renounce his citizenship, but he has to do that through the State Dept. (which CBP is not part of). And that is an elaborate and expensive process that can't even be done inside the United States. If someone could do it merely by entering without papers and asking for a self-deport, lots of expats would save a lot of money - and that's not gonna happen :)
...but they could put him to serious inconvenience
In this particular case, CBP found his documents suspect. Probably because (if it's the case we've seen documented elsewhere) he was with two other people whose entry was illegal, and they had forged documents.
So most likely, if he agreed to self-deport, CBP would use that as prima-facie evidence that he is not a bona-fide citizen, and therefore, that his papers are faked. They certainly will not give fake papers back to someone who has tried to pass them.
So the victim would be obliged to go back to SSA, the state, etc. and re-acquire his identity documents. From outside the country. It's a pretty big chore.
1
The citizen would be deported and have no papers? Yikes!
– gatorback
Jul 30 at 3:57
9
They had forged documents and his mother claimed he was not born in the US.
– chrylis -on strike-
Jul 30 at 6:26
2
Deported to where?
– gerrit
Jul 30 at 11:20
1
@gerrit In this case back to where his mother and sibling were from which was Mexico.
– Dean MacGregor
Jul 30 at 13:40
2
If I were hateful, I would earn some foreign income, pay US tax on it, then sue the Commissioner for the tax back, saying I shouldn't owe it since I am ruled not a citizen. Pull in CBP as a witness and let the judge give them what-for.
– Harper
Jul 30 at 21:28
|
show 8 more comments
They can't take his citizenship...
Since he claims to be a born citizen, he has citizenship by birthright and nothing CBP can do can possibly revoke it.
He can voluntarily renounce his citizenship, but he has to do that through the State Dept. (which CBP is not part of). And that is an elaborate and expensive process that can't even be done inside the United States. If someone could do it merely by entering without papers and asking for a self-deport, lots of expats would save a lot of money - and that's not gonna happen :)
...but they could put him to serious inconvenience
In this particular case, CBP found his documents suspect. Probably because (if it's the case we've seen documented elsewhere) he was with two other people whose entry was illegal, and they had forged documents.
So most likely, if he agreed to self-deport, CBP would use that as prima-facie evidence that he is not a bona-fide citizen, and therefore, that his papers are faked. They certainly will not give fake papers back to someone who has tried to pass them.
So the victim would be obliged to go back to SSA, the state, etc. and re-acquire his identity documents. From outside the country. It's a pretty big chore.
They can't take his citizenship...
Since he claims to be a born citizen, he has citizenship by birthright and nothing CBP can do can possibly revoke it.
He can voluntarily renounce his citizenship, but he has to do that through the State Dept. (which CBP is not part of). And that is an elaborate and expensive process that can't even be done inside the United States. If someone could do it merely by entering without papers and asking for a self-deport, lots of expats would save a lot of money - and that's not gonna happen :)
...but they could put him to serious inconvenience
In this particular case, CBP found his documents suspect. Probably because (if it's the case we've seen documented elsewhere) he was with two other people whose entry was illegal, and they had forged documents.
So most likely, if he agreed to self-deport, CBP would use that as prima-facie evidence that he is not a bona-fide citizen, and therefore, that his papers are faked. They certainly will not give fake papers back to someone who has tried to pass them.
So the victim would be obliged to go back to SSA, the state, etc. and re-acquire his identity documents. From outside the country. It's a pretty big chore.
edited Jul 30 at 0:07
answered Jul 29 at 23:57
HarperHarper
5,1302 gold badges7 silver badges28 bronze badges
5,1302 gold badges7 silver badges28 bronze badges
1
The citizen would be deported and have no papers? Yikes!
– gatorback
Jul 30 at 3:57
9
They had forged documents and his mother claimed he was not born in the US.
– chrylis -on strike-
Jul 30 at 6:26
2
Deported to where?
– gerrit
Jul 30 at 11:20
1
@gerrit In this case back to where his mother and sibling were from which was Mexico.
– Dean MacGregor
Jul 30 at 13:40
2
If I were hateful, I would earn some foreign income, pay US tax on it, then sue the Commissioner for the tax back, saying I shouldn't owe it since I am ruled not a citizen. Pull in CBP as a witness and let the judge give them what-for.
– Harper
Jul 30 at 21:28
|
show 8 more comments
1
The citizen would be deported and have no papers? Yikes!
– gatorback
Jul 30 at 3:57
9
They had forged documents and his mother claimed he was not born in the US.
– chrylis -on strike-
Jul 30 at 6:26
2
Deported to where?
– gerrit
Jul 30 at 11:20
1
@gerrit In this case back to where his mother and sibling were from which was Mexico.
– Dean MacGregor
Jul 30 at 13:40
2
If I were hateful, I would earn some foreign income, pay US tax on it, then sue the Commissioner for the tax back, saying I shouldn't owe it since I am ruled not a citizen. Pull in CBP as a witness and let the judge give them what-for.
– Harper
Jul 30 at 21:28
1
1
The citizen would be deported and have no papers? Yikes!
– gatorback
Jul 30 at 3:57
The citizen would be deported and have no papers? Yikes!
– gatorback
Jul 30 at 3:57
9
9
They had forged documents and his mother claimed he was not born in the US.
– chrylis -on strike-
Jul 30 at 6:26
They had forged documents and his mother claimed he was not born in the US.
– chrylis -on strike-
Jul 30 at 6:26
2
2
Deported to where?
– gerrit
Jul 30 at 11:20
Deported to where?
– gerrit
Jul 30 at 11:20
1
1
@gerrit In this case back to where his mother and sibling were from which was Mexico.
– Dean MacGregor
Jul 30 at 13:40
@gerrit In this case back to where his mother and sibling were from which was Mexico.
– Dean MacGregor
Jul 30 at 13:40
2
2
If I were hateful, I would earn some foreign income, pay US tax on it, then sue the Commissioner for the tax back, saying I shouldn't owe it since I am ruled not a citizen. Pull in CBP as a witness and let the judge give them what-for.
– Harper
Jul 30 at 21:28
If I were hateful, I would earn some foreign income, pay US tax on it, then sue the Commissioner for the tax back, saying I shouldn't owe it since I am ruled not a citizen. Pull in CBP as a witness and let the judge give them what-for.
– Harper
Jul 30 at 21:28
|
show 8 more comments
He's a citizen; his citizenship can't be taken by ICE or CBP, and he can't legally be kept from returning to the US from Mexico by them. He was offered "self-deportation" because ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him, thinking that his documents were forged or stolen.
He could have "self-deported" in order to simply get out of detention, since it was offered by ICE; but he's a US citizen, so as soon as he was in Mexico, he could simply go to the border and cross with his documents. If CBP kept him from crossing at the border, his lawyer could attest to his citizenship with documents. And any "self-deportation" document he signed could be shown to be meaningless in court, since he's a citizen, and ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him.
15
Also, since he is not a Mexican citizen, Mexico would be under no obligation to allow him to enter their country, and it could deport him to the U.S. if it wished.
– ohwilleke
Jul 30 at 1:28
15
It strikes me that "simply" is probably not the term that applies to a border crossing after you've been deported as a non-citizen. Your biometrics would be on file as a person who has been deported, and it's not clear to me what travel documents you'd have (they presumably won't deport you and hand you your US passport on your way out the door). I'm not saying that you won't get back, but it's unlikely to be a simple process.
– Zach Lipton
Jul 30 at 7:12
6
If a "self-deportation document" incorporates an "admission" that the signatory is not a US citizen, could a US citizen who signs this and later successfully proves his citizenship be guilty of some offense relating to false statements and become the target of a new, ostensibly lawful, detention?
– Will
Jul 30 at 11:07
4
If there was a reasonable suspicion, that Francisco Erwin Galicia was in possession of forged documents, why is it stated that "ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him"?
– Michael J.
Jul 30 at 14:52
4
@MichaelJ. At some point in the three weeks, whatever reasonable suspicion they had ceased to be reasonable. If it had truly been reasonable, they would have described their reasonable suspicion instead of falsely claiming that he never asserted US citizenship. While they have disclosed facts that make some suspicion reasonable, they have not explained why they held him for so long. Also, for a criminal arrest, the standard is probable cause. They have an obligation to establish probable cause by investigating their suspicion. Whether the investigation was sufficient is not apparent.
– phoog
Jul 31 at 11:48
|
show 12 more comments
He's a citizen; his citizenship can't be taken by ICE or CBP, and he can't legally be kept from returning to the US from Mexico by them. He was offered "self-deportation" because ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him, thinking that his documents were forged or stolen.
He could have "self-deported" in order to simply get out of detention, since it was offered by ICE; but he's a US citizen, so as soon as he was in Mexico, he could simply go to the border and cross with his documents. If CBP kept him from crossing at the border, his lawyer could attest to his citizenship with documents. And any "self-deportation" document he signed could be shown to be meaningless in court, since he's a citizen, and ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him.
15
Also, since he is not a Mexican citizen, Mexico would be under no obligation to allow him to enter their country, and it could deport him to the U.S. if it wished.
– ohwilleke
Jul 30 at 1:28
15
It strikes me that "simply" is probably not the term that applies to a border crossing after you've been deported as a non-citizen. Your biometrics would be on file as a person who has been deported, and it's not clear to me what travel documents you'd have (they presumably won't deport you and hand you your US passport on your way out the door). I'm not saying that you won't get back, but it's unlikely to be a simple process.
– Zach Lipton
Jul 30 at 7:12
6
If a "self-deportation document" incorporates an "admission" that the signatory is not a US citizen, could a US citizen who signs this and later successfully proves his citizenship be guilty of some offense relating to false statements and become the target of a new, ostensibly lawful, detention?
– Will
Jul 30 at 11:07
4
If there was a reasonable suspicion, that Francisco Erwin Galicia was in possession of forged documents, why is it stated that "ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him"?
– Michael J.
Jul 30 at 14:52
4
@MichaelJ. At some point in the three weeks, whatever reasonable suspicion they had ceased to be reasonable. If it had truly been reasonable, they would have described their reasonable suspicion instead of falsely claiming that he never asserted US citizenship. While they have disclosed facts that make some suspicion reasonable, they have not explained why they held him for so long. Also, for a criminal arrest, the standard is probable cause. They have an obligation to establish probable cause by investigating their suspicion. Whether the investigation was sufficient is not apparent.
– phoog
Jul 31 at 11:48
|
show 12 more comments
He's a citizen; his citizenship can't be taken by ICE or CBP, and he can't legally be kept from returning to the US from Mexico by them. He was offered "self-deportation" because ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him, thinking that his documents were forged or stolen.
He could have "self-deported" in order to simply get out of detention, since it was offered by ICE; but he's a US citizen, so as soon as he was in Mexico, he could simply go to the border and cross with his documents. If CBP kept him from crossing at the border, his lawyer could attest to his citizenship with documents. And any "self-deportation" document he signed could be shown to be meaningless in court, since he's a citizen, and ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him.
He's a citizen; his citizenship can't be taken by ICE or CBP, and he can't legally be kept from returning to the US from Mexico by them. He was offered "self-deportation" because ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him, thinking that his documents were forged or stolen.
He could have "self-deported" in order to simply get out of detention, since it was offered by ICE; but he's a US citizen, so as soon as he was in Mexico, he could simply go to the border and cross with his documents. If CBP kept him from crossing at the border, his lawyer could attest to his citizenship with documents. And any "self-deportation" document he signed could be shown to be meaningless in court, since he's a citizen, and ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him.
edited Jul 29 at 20:42
answered Jul 29 at 20:23
BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch
13.1k3 gold badges24 silver badges43 bronze badges
13.1k3 gold badges24 silver badges43 bronze badges
15
Also, since he is not a Mexican citizen, Mexico would be under no obligation to allow him to enter their country, and it could deport him to the U.S. if it wished.
– ohwilleke
Jul 30 at 1:28
15
It strikes me that "simply" is probably not the term that applies to a border crossing after you've been deported as a non-citizen. Your biometrics would be on file as a person who has been deported, and it's not clear to me what travel documents you'd have (they presumably won't deport you and hand you your US passport on your way out the door). I'm not saying that you won't get back, but it's unlikely to be a simple process.
– Zach Lipton
Jul 30 at 7:12
6
If a "self-deportation document" incorporates an "admission" that the signatory is not a US citizen, could a US citizen who signs this and later successfully proves his citizenship be guilty of some offense relating to false statements and become the target of a new, ostensibly lawful, detention?
– Will
Jul 30 at 11:07
4
If there was a reasonable suspicion, that Francisco Erwin Galicia was in possession of forged documents, why is it stated that "ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him"?
– Michael J.
Jul 30 at 14:52
4
@MichaelJ. At some point in the three weeks, whatever reasonable suspicion they had ceased to be reasonable. If it had truly been reasonable, they would have described their reasonable suspicion instead of falsely claiming that he never asserted US citizenship. While they have disclosed facts that make some suspicion reasonable, they have not explained why they held him for so long. Also, for a criminal arrest, the standard is probable cause. They have an obligation to establish probable cause by investigating their suspicion. Whether the investigation was sufficient is not apparent.
– phoog
Jul 31 at 11:48
|
show 12 more comments
15
Also, since he is not a Mexican citizen, Mexico would be under no obligation to allow him to enter their country, and it could deport him to the U.S. if it wished.
– ohwilleke
Jul 30 at 1:28
15
It strikes me that "simply" is probably not the term that applies to a border crossing after you've been deported as a non-citizen. Your biometrics would be on file as a person who has been deported, and it's not clear to me what travel documents you'd have (they presumably won't deport you and hand you your US passport on your way out the door). I'm not saying that you won't get back, but it's unlikely to be a simple process.
– Zach Lipton
Jul 30 at 7:12
6
If a "self-deportation document" incorporates an "admission" that the signatory is not a US citizen, could a US citizen who signs this and later successfully proves his citizenship be guilty of some offense relating to false statements and become the target of a new, ostensibly lawful, detention?
– Will
Jul 30 at 11:07
4
If there was a reasonable suspicion, that Francisco Erwin Galicia was in possession of forged documents, why is it stated that "ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him"?
– Michael J.
Jul 30 at 14:52
4
@MichaelJ. At some point in the three weeks, whatever reasonable suspicion they had ceased to be reasonable. If it had truly been reasonable, they would have described their reasonable suspicion instead of falsely claiming that he never asserted US citizenship. While they have disclosed facts that make some suspicion reasonable, they have not explained why they held him for so long. Also, for a criminal arrest, the standard is probable cause. They have an obligation to establish probable cause by investigating their suspicion. Whether the investigation was sufficient is not apparent.
– phoog
Jul 31 at 11:48
15
15
Also, since he is not a Mexican citizen, Mexico would be under no obligation to allow him to enter their country, and it could deport him to the U.S. if it wished.
– ohwilleke
Jul 30 at 1:28
Also, since he is not a Mexican citizen, Mexico would be under no obligation to allow him to enter their country, and it could deport him to the U.S. if it wished.
– ohwilleke
Jul 30 at 1:28
15
15
It strikes me that "simply" is probably not the term that applies to a border crossing after you've been deported as a non-citizen. Your biometrics would be on file as a person who has been deported, and it's not clear to me what travel documents you'd have (they presumably won't deport you and hand you your US passport on your way out the door). I'm not saying that you won't get back, but it's unlikely to be a simple process.
– Zach Lipton
Jul 30 at 7:12
It strikes me that "simply" is probably not the term that applies to a border crossing after you've been deported as a non-citizen. Your biometrics would be on file as a person who has been deported, and it's not clear to me what travel documents you'd have (they presumably won't deport you and hand you your US passport on your way out the door). I'm not saying that you won't get back, but it's unlikely to be a simple process.
– Zach Lipton
Jul 30 at 7:12
6
6
If a "self-deportation document" incorporates an "admission" that the signatory is not a US citizen, could a US citizen who signs this and later successfully proves his citizenship be guilty of some offense relating to false statements and become the target of a new, ostensibly lawful, detention?
– Will
Jul 30 at 11:07
If a "self-deportation document" incorporates an "admission" that the signatory is not a US citizen, could a US citizen who signs this and later successfully proves his citizenship be guilty of some offense relating to false statements and become the target of a new, ostensibly lawful, detention?
– Will
Jul 30 at 11:07
4
4
If there was a reasonable suspicion, that Francisco Erwin Galicia was in possession of forged documents, why is it stated that "ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him"?
– Michael J.
Jul 30 at 14:52
If there was a reasonable suspicion, that Francisco Erwin Galicia was in possession of forged documents, why is it stated that "ICE was illegally or irrationally detaining him"?
– Michael J.
Jul 30 at 14:52
4
4
@MichaelJ. At some point in the three weeks, whatever reasonable suspicion they had ceased to be reasonable. If it had truly been reasonable, they would have described their reasonable suspicion instead of falsely claiming that he never asserted US citizenship. While they have disclosed facts that make some suspicion reasonable, they have not explained why they held him for so long. Also, for a criminal arrest, the standard is probable cause. They have an obligation to establish probable cause by investigating their suspicion. Whether the investigation was sufficient is not apparent.
– phoog
Jul 31 at 11:48
@MichaelJ. At some point in the three weeks, whatever reasonable suspicion they had ceased to be reasonable. If it had truly been reasonable, they would have described their reasonable suspicion instead of falsely claiming that he never asserted US citizenship. While they have disclosed facts that make some suspicion reasonable, they have not explained why they held him for so long. Also, for a criminal arrest, the standard is probable cause. They have an obligation to establish probable cause by investigating their suspicion. Whether the investigation was sufficient is not apparent.
– phoog
Jul 31 at 11:48
|
show 12 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43279%2fself-deportation-of-american-citizens-from-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
Related: the UK forcibly deported citizens to Jamaica, and not all of them have managed to get back. Some died before the abuse could be rectified. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/…
– pjc50
Jul 30 at 12:46