Why did Steve Rogers choose this character in Endgame?Why did Colonel Mortimer's sister kill herself instead of killing Indio?How did Steve Rogers find this place?Was Steve Rogers supporting Bucky by lying?Was Steve Rogers legally a “Captain” America?How could they return the Infinity Stones in their “raw” form?Why was Steve Rogers' yard so overgrown?Why go to such a disadvantageous time in “Avengers: Endgame”?Why didn't this character get a funeral at the end of Avengers: Endgame?Why didn't Steve Rogers want to talk about his wife?

Why is this missile positioned in this odd position? How can it be launched correctly?

Why is it possible to teach real numbers before even rigorously defining them?

Does spacetime structure in GR break time symmetry?

Do rainbows show spectral lines from the sun?

What would make the internet go away?

In a shuttle launch, what would have happened if all three SSMEs failed during flight?

Draw circle using characters

What is the difference between turbojet and turbofan engines?

Why is the Speaker elected by secret ballot?

Printing Command Line Unicode Chess Board

Cooking octopus: simple boil or broth?

Why do airports in the UK have so few runways?

What is "okinta"?

Does Enthrall make targets require perception checks to perceive anything other than the caster?

What music is this?

Was the whistle-blower's (12 Aug 2019) complaint deemed credible?

Stream of Thought/Creeping Chill Interaction?

Best way to clean car carpet?

ssh login using public keys for users that do not (yet) exist

Why does the single dot entry exist in file systems?

Fantasy story about a knife that can cut holes to other dimensions

Monoidal category that is not spacial

What would happen to the world if all lightning stopped?

What is the most efficient algorithm to compute polynomial coefficients from its roots?



Why did Steve Rogers choose this character in Endgame?


Why did Colonel Mortimer's sister kill herself instead of killing Indio?How did Steve Rogers find this place?Was Steve Rogers supporting Bucky by lying?Was Steve Rogers legally a “Captain” America?How could they return the Infinity Stones in their “raw” form?Why was Steve Rogers' yard so overgrown?Why go to such a disadvantageous time in “Avengers: Endgame”?Why didn't this character get a funeral at the end of Avengers: Endgame?Why didn't Steve Rogers want to talk about his wife?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









43

















In the end of Endgame, we see Cap giving the shield to Sam Wilson.



So why didn't he give the shield to Bucky? Sam Wilson was already a great superhero without a shield, and Bucky obviously needed something more than a gun. Also, Steve and Bucky are best friends.










share|improve this question




























  • @NapoleonWilson I approved the last edit, because it actually helps users to avoid spoilers.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 11:44












  • Let's face it, There is nothing super about Sam other than his personality, now with the shield, he just became a bit more super

    – Huangism
    Jul 16 at 17:36











  • @Huangism I just can't imagine Captain America with mechanical wings.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 17:44






  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Huh? In the end of Ciwil War Stark simply rips Bucky's arm off :)

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 14:50







  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Agree :D

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 15:11

















43

















In the end of Endgame, we see Cap giving the shield to Sam Wilson.



So why didn't he give the shield to Bucky? Sam Wilson was already a great superhero without a shield, and Bucky obviously needed something more than a gun. Also, Steve and Bucky are best friends.










share|improve this question




























  • @NapoleonWilson I approved the last edit, because it actually helps users to avoid spoilers.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 11:44












  • Let's face it, There is nothing super about Sam other than his personality, now with the shield, he just became a bit more super

    – Huangism
    Jul 16 at 17:36











  • @Huangism I just can't imagine Captain America with mechanical wings.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 17:44






  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Huh? In the end of Ciwil War Stark simply rips Bucky's arm off :)

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 14:50







  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Agree :D

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 15:11













43












43








43


3






In the end of Endgame, we see Cap giving the shield to Sam Wilson.



So why didn't he give the shield to Bucky? Sam Wilson was already a great superhero without a shield, and Bucky obviously needed something more than a gun. Also, Steve and Bucky are best friends.










share|improve this question

















In the end of Endgame, we see Cap giving the shield to Sam Wilson.



So why didn't he give the shield to Bucky? Sam Wilson was already a great superhero without a shield, and Bucky obviously needed something more than a gun. Also, Steve and Bucky are best friends.







plot-explanation marvel-cinematic-universe ending avengers-endgame






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 16 at 11:36









Dancrumb

1054 bronze badges




1054 bronze badges










asked Jul 15 at 9:04









Ver NickVer Nick

2,2824 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges




2,2824 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges















  • @NapoleonWilson I approved the last edit, because it actually helps users to avoid spoilers.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 11:44












  • Let's face it, There is nothing super about Sam other than his personality, now with the shield, he just became a bit more super

    – Huangism
    Jul 16 at 17:36











  • @Huangism I just can't imagine Captain America with mechanical wings.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 17:44






  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Huh? In the end of Ciwil War Stark simply rips Bucky's arm off :)

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 14:50







  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Agree :D

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 15:11

















  • @NapoleonWilson I approved the last edit, because it actually helps users to avoid spoilers.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 11:44












  • Let's face it, There is nothing super about Sam other than his personality, now with the shield, he just became a bit more super

    – Huangism
    Jul 16 at 17:36











  • @Huangism I just can't imagine Captain America with mechanical wings.

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 16 at 17:44






  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Huh? In the end of Ciwil War Stark simply rips Bucky's arm off :)

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 14:50







  • 1





    @PaulD.Waite Agree :D

    – Ver Nick
    Jul 17 at 15:11
















@NapoleonWilson I approved the last edit, because it actually helps users to avoid spoilers.

– Ver Nick
Jul 16 at 11:44






@NapoleonWilson I approved the last edit, because it actually helps users to avoid spoilers.

– Ver Nick
Jul 16 at 11:44














Let's face it, There is nothing super about Sam other than his personality, now with the shield, he just became a bit more super

– Huangism
Jul 16 at 17:36





Let's face it, There is nothing super about Sam other than his personality, now with the shield, he just became a bit more super

– Huangism
Jul 16 at 17:36













@Huangism I just can't imagine Captain America with mechanical wings.

– Ver Nick
Jul 16 at 17:44





@Huangism I just can't imagine Captain America with mechanical wings.

– Ver Nick
Jul 16 at 17:44




1




1





@PaulD.Waite Huh? In the end of Ciwil War Stark simply rips Bucky's arm off :)

– Ver Nick
Jul 17 at 14:50






@PaulD.Waite Huh? In the end of Ciwil War Stark simply rips Bucky's arm off :)

– Ver Nick
Jul 17 at 14:50





1




1





@PaulD.Waite Agree :D

– Ver Nick
Jul 17 at 15:11





@PaulD.Waite Agree :D

– Ver Nick
Jul 17 at 15:11










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















78


















Although they are Russo's words, I don't agree to their reasoning. I do, however, agree with their decision to pass on the symbol of Captain America to Sam.



Bucky is fighting for the right side now but that doesn't absolve him of the crimes he committed. Him being brainwashed doesn't erase his sins.



At the end of Civil War Bucky is still a criminal in the world. He has taken refuge in Wakanda and is healing. He doesn't leave Wakanda and fights with the Avengers and gets snapped. When he is blipped after 5 years and fights and wins with the Avengers saving humanity, however great his contribution may be, he still committed murder in his past and will be questioned as a criminal if not by law then by the media.



Bucky won't be an unquestioned symbol of integrity. His past and PTSD won't allow him to make the right decision at all times that is expected of Captain America.



Sam, on the other hand, fits the role perfectly. A retired war hero, who helps others with their PTSD, who got back into the field to help Captain America, when no one else would, was branded a fugitive and traitor, but did the right thing everytime no matter the personal cost.



He's the perfect candidate in terms of Steve because he sees himself in Sam.



He's the perfect candidate for the world, with unquestioned integrity.



Also, Steve had seen Bucky's mental and physical suffering and would rather let him rest and live out his days as a normal being. To get a life.






share|improve this answer























  • 2





    Your answer presents some excellent reasoning, but...isn't that pretty much what the Russos are saying, too? The answer still stands on its own, but I can't really see in which way it "disagrees with their reasoning".

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 15:10







  • 5





    @NapoleonWilson In the phrasing that "not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted". I don't get the impression that he can be corrupted and possibly become menace to society if made CA. My reasoning is that he is a broken man, who doesn't have the moral conviction to make right choices for other people like Steve. Also, media would be instantly against him for his past. So, public opinion can go against him

    – KharoBangdo
    Jul 15 at 16:48






  • 1





    I see. I guess I took the Russos' statement less direct and more in the way like you describe Bucky, too.

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 16:52











  • Yeah, I took the Russo's statement to be implying this, although your answer is good to expand on it. For the corruption, I assumed they meant he's also at risk of being further brainwashed as who knows what triggers still exist in him.

    – IronSean
    Jul 17 at 12:52


















27


















Copying from my answer to the same question on SFF:



Because Sam was the logical choice over Bucky



Joe Russo explains it in the following interview.




"It made sense that it was Sam," Joe Russo said. "I don't think that there were significant debates at all. Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted. And Sam, if anyone matches Cap's integrity over the course of the last few films, it's Sam. From the time that they met on the mall in D.C. through the end of this film, and he just seemed like the logical choice in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. We don't have all of the context that the comics have, we can only bring completion to the stories that we've been telling and that seemed to make the most sense."



Comic Book, Avengers: Endgame Directors Explain Why Captain America Chose Sam Over Bucky







share|improve this answer





















  • 10





    "Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted." - this isn't a great reason at all. Presumably, they were able to remove Bucky's conditioning in Wakanda, since he requested to be asleep until that happened. And such a statement that he's" damaged" is a pretty bad message about PTSD.

    – user58
    Jul 15 at 9:55






  • 5





    I think the angle they were going here is that Bucky undeniably has some darkness in him, and despite (presumably) being no longer affected by the conditioning, he's still been left somewhat damaged and cynical by the whole thing. Captain America (as a persona) is optimistic and never gives up ("I could do this all day"). Sam's outlook is definitely the closest to Cap's attitude to life. Plus, I can't help but spot the parallels between the post-Snap therapy session that Cap was running in Endgame, and the PTSD therapy session that Sam was running back in Winter Soldier. He's a natural choice.

    – anaximander
    Jul 16 at 9:58






  • 2





    they wanted a black cap

    – Pemba Tamang
    Jul 17 at 7:57






  • 3





    @Mithrandir: Bucky isn't damaged by PTSD. He's damaged by experimentation and brain-washing that turned him into one of Hydra's deadliest agents.

    – Paul D. Waite
    Jul 17 at 13:53



















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









78


















Although they are Russo's words, I don't agree to their reasoning. I do, however, agree with their decision to pass on the symbol of Captain America to Sam.



Bucky is fighting for the right side now but that doesn't absolve him of the crimes he committed. Him being brainwashed doesn't erase his sins.



At the end of Civil War Bucky is still a criminal in the world. He has taken refuge in Wakanda and is healing. He doesn't leave Wakanda and fights with the Avengers and gets snapped. When he is blipped after 5 years and fights and wins with the Avengers saving humanity, however great his contribution may be, he still committed murder in his past and will be questioned as a criminal if not by law then by the media.



Bucky won't be an unquestioned symbol of integrity. His past and PTSD won't allow him to make the right decision at all times that is expected of Captain America.



Sam, on the other hand, fits the role perfectly. A retired war hero, who helps others with their PTSD, who got back into the field to help Captain America, when no one else would, was branded a fugitive and traitor, but did the right thing everytime no matter the personal cost.



He's the perfect candidate in terms of Steve because he sees himself in Sam.



He's the perfect candidate for the world, with unquestioned integrity.



Also, Steve had seen Bucky's mental and physical suffering and would rather let him rest and live out his days as a normal being. To get a life.






share|improve this answer























  • 2





    Your answer presents some excellent reasoning, but...isn't that pretty much what the Russos are saying, too? The answer still stands on its own, but I can't really see in which way it "disagrees with their reasoning".

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 15:10







  • 5





    @NapoleonWilson In the phrasing that "not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted". I don't get the impression that he can be corrupted and possibly become menace to society if made CA. My reasoning is that he is a broken man, who doesn't have the moral conviction to make right choices for other people like Steve. Also, media would be instantly against him for his past. So, public opinion can go against him

    – KharoBangdo
    Jul 15 at 16:48






  • 1





    I see. I guess I took the Russos' statement less direct and more in the way like you describe Bucky, too.

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 16:52











  • Yeah, I took the Russo's statement to be implying this, although your answer is good to expand on it. For the corruption, I assumed they meant he's also at risk of being further brainwashed as who knows what triggers still exist in him.

    – IronSean
    Jul 17 at 12:52















78


















Although they are Russo's words, I don't agree to their reasoning. I do, however, agree with their decision to pass on the symbol of Captain America to Sam.



Bucky is fighting for the right side now but that doesn't absolve him of the crimes he committed. Him being brainwashed doesn't erase his sins.



At the end of Civil War Bucky is still a criminal in the world. He has taken refuge in Wakanda and is healing. He doesn't leave Wakanda and fights with the Avengers and gets snapped. When he is blipped after 5 years and fights and wins with the Avengers saving humanity, however great his contribution may be, he still committed murder in his past and will be questioned as a criminal if not by law then by the media.



Bucky won't be an unquestioned symbol of integrity. His past and PTSD won't allow him to make the right decision at all times that is expected of Captain America.



Sam, on the other hand, fits the role perfectly. A retired war hero, who helps others with their PTSD, who got back into the field to help Captain America, when no one else would, was branded a fugitive and traitor, but did the right thing everytime no matter the personal cost.



He's the perfect candidate in terms of Steve because he sees himself in Sam.



He's the perfect candidate for the world, with unquestioned integrity.



Also, Steve had seen Bucky's mental and physical suffering and would rather let him rest and live out his days as a normal being. To get a life.






share|improve this answer























  • 2





    Your answer presents some excellent reasoning, but...isn't that pretty much what the Russos are saying, too? The answer still stands on its own, but I can't really see in which way it "disagrees with their reasoning".

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 15:10







  • 5





    @NapoleonWilson In the phrasing that "not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted". I don't get the impression that he can be corrupted and possibly become menace to society if made CA. My reasoning is that he is a broken man, who doesn't have the moral conviction to make right choices for other people like Steve. Also, media would be instantly against him for his past. So, public opinion can go against him

    – KharoBangdo
    Jul 15 at 16:48






  • 1





    I see. I guess I took the Russos' statement less direct and more in the way like you describe Bucky, too.

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 16:52











  • Yeah, I took the Russo's statement to be implying this, although your answer is good to expand on it. For the corruption, I assumed they meant he's also at risk of being further brainwashed as who knows what triggers still exist in him.

    – IronSean
    Jul 17 at 12:52













78














78










78









Although they are Russo's words, I don't agree to their reasoning. I do, however, agree with their decision to pass on the symbol of Captain America to Sam.



Bucky is fighting for the right side now but that doesn't absolve him of the crimes he committed. Him being brainwashed doesn't erase his sins.



At the end of Civil War Bucky is still a criminal in the world. He has taken refuge in Wakanda and is healing. He doesn't leave Wakanda and fights with the Avengers and gets snapped. When he is blipped after 5 years and fights and wins with the Avengers saving humanity, however great his contribution may be, he still committed murder in his past and will be questioned as a criminal if not by law then by the media.



Bucky won't be an unquestioned symbol of integrity. His past and PTSD won't allow him to make the right decision at all times that is expected of Captain America.



Sam, on the other hand, fits the role perfectly. A retired war hero, who helps others with their PTSD, who got back into the field to help Captain America, when no one else would, was branded a fugitive and traitor, but did the right thing everytime no matter the personal cost.



He's the perfect candidate in terms of Steve because he sees himself in Sam.



He's the perfect candidate for the world, with unquestioned integrity.



Also, Steve had seen Bucky's mental and physical suffering and would rather let him rest and live out his days as a normal being. To get a life.






share|improve this answer
















Although they are Russo's words, I don't agree to their reasoning. I do, however, agree with their decision to pass on the symbol of Captain America to Sam.



Bucky is fighting for the right side now but that doesn't absolve him of the crimes he committed. Him being brainwashed doesn't erase his sins.



At the end of Civil War Bucky is still a criminal in the world. He has taken refuge in Wakanda and is healing. He doesn't leave Wakanda and fights with the Avengers and gets snapped. When he is blipped after 5 years and fights and wins with the Avengers saving humanity, however great his contribution may be, he still committed murder in his past and will be questioned as a criminal if not by law then by the media.



Bucky won't be an unquestioned symbol of integrity. His past and PTSD won't allow him to make the right decision at all times that is expected of Captain America.



Sam, on the other hand, fits the role perfectly. A retired war hero, who helps others with their PTSD, who got back into the field to help Captain America, when no one else would, was branded a fugitive and traitor, but did the right thing everytime no matter the personal cost.



He's the perfect candidate in terms of Steve because he sees himself in Sam.



He's the perfect candidate for the world, with unquestioned integrity.



Also, Steve had seen Bucky's mental and physical suffering and would rather let him rest and live out his days as a normal being. To get a life.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited Jul 15 at 15:08









Napoleon Wilson

43.7k47 gold badges289 silver badges557 bronze badges




43.7k47 gold badges289 silver badges557 bronze badges










answered Jul 15 at 12:13









KharoBangdoKharoBangdo

8,72717 gold badges73 silver badges116 bronze badges




8,72717 gold badges73 silver badges116 bronze badges










  • 2





    Your answer presents some excellent reasoning, but...isn't that pretty much what the Russos are saying, too? The answer still stands on its own, but I can't really see in which way it "disagrees with their reasoning".

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 15:10







  • 5





    @NapoleonWilson In the phrasing that "not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted". I don't get the impression that he can be corrupted and possibly become menace to society if made CA. My reasoning is that he is a broken man, who doesn't have the moral conviction to make right choices for other people like Steve. Also, media would be instantly against him for his past. So, public opinion can go against him

    – KharoBangdo
    Jul 15 at 16:48






  • 1





    I see. I guess I took the Russos' statement less direct and more in the way like you describe Bucky, too.

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 16:52











  • Yeah, I took the Russo's statement to be implying this, although your answer is good to expand on it. For the corruption, I assumed they meant he's also at risk of being further brainwashed as who knows what triggers still exist in him.

    – IronSean
    Jul 17 at 12:52












  • 2





    Your answer presents some excellent reasoning, but...isn't that pretty much what the Russos are saying, too? The answer still stands on its own, but I can't really see in which way it "disagrees with their reasoning".

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 15:10







  • 5





    @NapoleonWilson In the phrasing that "not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted". I don't get the impression that he can be corrupted and possibly become menace to society if made CA. My reasoning is that he is a broken man, who doesn't have the moral conviction to make right choices for other people like Steve. Also, media would be instantly against him for his past. So, public opinion can go against him

    – KharoBangdo
    Jul 15 at 16:48






  • 1





    I see. I guess I took the Russos' statement less direct and more in the way like you describe Bucky, too.

    – Napoleon Wilson
    Jul 15 at 16:52











  • Yeah, I took the Russo's statement to be implying this, although your answer is good to expand on it. For the corruption, I assumed they meant he's also at risk of being further brainwashed as who knows what triggers still exist in him.

    – IronSean
    Jul 17 at 12:52







2




2





Your answer presents some excellent reasoning, but...isn't that pretty much what the Russos are saying, too? The answer still stands on its own, but I can't really see in which way it "disagrees with their reasoning".

– Napoleon Wilson
Jul 15 at 15:10






Your answer presents some excellent reasoning, but...isn't that pretty much what the Russos are saying, too? The answer still stands on its own, but I can't really see in which way it "disagrees with their reasoning".

– Napoleon Wilson
Jul 15 at 15:10





5




5





@NapoleonWilson In the phrasing that "not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted". I don't get the impression that he can be corrupted and possibly become menace to society if made CA. My reasoning is that he is a broken man, who doesn't have the moral conviction to make right choices for other people like Steve. Also, media would be instantly against him for his past. So, public opinion can go against him

– KharoBangdo
Jul 15 at 16:48





@NapoleonWilson In the phrasing that "not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted". I don't get the impression that he can be corrupted and possibly become menace to society if made CA. My reasoning is that he is a broken man, who doesn't have the moral conviction to make right choices for other people like Steve. Also, media would be instantly against him for his past. So, public opinion can go against him

– KharoBangdo
Jul 15 at 16:48




1




1





I see. I guess I took the Russos' statement less direct and more in the way like you describe Bucky, too.

– Napoleon Wilson
Jul 15 at 16:52





I see. I guess I took the Russos' statement less direct and more in the way like you describe Bucky, too.

– Napoleon Wilson
Jul 15 at 16:52













Yeah, I took the Russo's statement to be implying this, although your answer is good to expand on it. For the corruption, I assumed they meant he's also at risk of being further brainwashed as who knows what triggers still exist in him.

– IronSean
Jul 17 at 12:52





Yeah, I took the Russo's statement to be implying this, although your answer is good to expand on it. For the corruption, I assumed they meant he's also at risk of being further brainwashed as who knows what triggers still exist in him.

– IronSean
Jul 17 at 12:52













27


















Copying from my answer to the same question on SFF:



Because Sam was the logical choice over Bucky



Joe Russo explains it in the following interview.




"It made sense that it was Sam," Joe Russo said. "I don't think that there were significant debates at all. Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted. And Sam, if anyone matches Cap's integrity over the course of the last few films, it's Sam. From the time that they met on the mall in D.C. through the end of this film, and he just seemed like the logical choice in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. We don't have all of the context that the comics have, we can only bring completion to the stories that we've been telling and that seemed to make the most sense."



Comic Book, Avengers: Endgame Directors Explain Why Captain America Chose Sam Over Bucky







share|improve this answer





















  • 10





    "Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted." - this isn't a great reason at all. Presumably, they were able to remove Bucky's conditioning in Wakanda, since he requested to be asleep until that happened. And such a statement that he's" damaged" is a pretty bad message about PTSD.

    – user58
    Jul 15 at 9:55






  • 5





    I think the angle they were going here is that Bucky undeniably has some darkness in him, and despite (presumably) being no longer affected by the conditioning, he's still been left somewhat damaged and cynical by the whole thing. Captain America (as a persona) is optimistic and never gives up ("I could do this all day"). Sam's outlook is definitely the closest to Cap's attitude to life. Plus, I can't help but spot the parallels between the post-Snap therapy session that Cap was running in Endgame, and the PTSD therapy session that Sam was running back in Winter Soldier. He's a natural choice.

    – anaximander
    Jul 16 at 9:58






  • 2





    they wanted a black cap

    – Pemba Tamang
    Jul 17 at 7:57






  • 3





    @Mithrandir: Bucky isn't damaged by PTSD. He's damaged by experimentation and brain-washing that turned him into one of Hydra's deadliest agents.

    – Paul D. Waite
    Jul 17 at 13:53















27


















Copying from my answer to the same question on SFF:



Because Sam was the logical choice over Bucky



Joe Russo explains it in the following interview.




"It made sense that it was Sam," Joe Russo said. "I don't think that there were significant debates at all. Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted. And Sam, if anyone matches Cap's integrity over the course of the last few films, it's Sam. From the time that they met on the mall in D.C. through the end of this film, and he just seemed like the logical choice in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. We don't have all of the context that the comics have, we can only bring completion to the stories that we've been telling and that seemed to make the most sense."



Comic Book, Avengers: Endgame Directors Explain Why Captain America Chose Sam Over Bucky







share|improve this answer





















  • 10





    "Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted." - this isn't a great reason at all. Presumably, they were able to remove Bucky's conditioning in Wakanda, since he requested to be asleep until that happened. And such a statement that he's" damaged" is a pretty bad message about PTSD.

    – user58
    Jul 15 at 9:55






  • 5





    I think the angle they were going here is that Bucky undeniably has some darkness in him, and despite (presumably) being no longer affected by the conditioning, he's still been left somewhat damaged and cynical by the whole thing. Captain America (as a persona) is optimistic and never gives up ("I could do this all day"). Sam's outlook is definitely the closest to Cap's attitude to life. Plus, I can't help but spot the parallels between the post-Snap therapy session that Cap was running in Endgame, and the PTSD therapy session that Sam was running back in Winter Soldier. He's a natural choice.

    – anaximander
    Jul 16 at 9:58






  • 2





    they wanted a black cap

    – Pemba Tamang
    Jul 17 at 7:57






  • 3





    @Mithrandir: Bucky isn't damaged by PTSD. He's damaged by experimentation and brain-washing that turned him into one of Hydra's deadliest agents.

    – Paul D. Waite
    Jul 17 at 13:53













27














27










27









Copying from my answer to the same question on SFF:



Because Sam was the logical choice over Bucky



Joe Russo explains it in the following interview.




"It made sense that it was Sam," Joe Russo said. "I don't think that there were significant debates at all. Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted. And Sam, if anyone matches Cap's integrity over the course of the last few films, it's Sam. From the time that they met on the mall in D.C. through the end of this film, and he just seemed like the logical choice in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. We don't have all of the context that the comics have, we can only bring completion to the stories that we've been telling and that seemed to make the most sense."



Comic Book, Avengers: Endgame Directors Explain Why Captain America Chose Sam Over Bucky







share|improve this answer














Copying from my answer to the same question on SFF:



Because Sam was the logical choice over Bucky



Joe Russo explains it in the following interview.




"It made sense that it was Sam," Joe Russo said. "I don't think that there were significant debates at all. Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted. And Sam, if anyone matches Cap's integrity over the course of the last few films, it's Sam. From the time that they met on the mall in D.C. through the end of this film, and he just seemed like the logical choice in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. We don't have all of the context that the comics have, we can only bring completion to the stories that we've been telling and that seemed to make the most sense."



Comic Book, Avengers: Endgame Directors Explain Why Captain America Chose Sam Over Bucky








share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered Jul 15 at 9:11









TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot

11k53 silver badges70 bronze badges




11k53 silver badges70 bronze badges










  • 10





    "Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted." - this isn't a great reason at all. Presumably, they were able to remove Bucky's conditioning in Wakanda, since he requested to be asleep until that happened. And such a statement that he's" damaged" is a pretty bad message about PTSD.

    – user58
    Jul 15 at 9:55






  • 5





    I think the angle they were going here is that Bucky undeniably has some darkness in him, and despite (presumably) being no longer affected by the conditioning, he's still been left somewhat damaged and cynical by the whole thing. Captain America (as a persona) is optimistic and never gives up ("I could do this all day"). Sam's outlook is definitely the closest to Cap's attitude to life. Plus, I can't help but spot the parallels between the post-Snap therapy session that Cap was running in Endgame, and the PTSD therapy session that Sam was running back in Winter Soldier. He's a natural choice.

    – anaximander
    Jul 16 at 9:58






  • 2





    they wanted a black cap

    – Pemba Tamang
    Jul 17 at 7:57






  • 3





    @Mithrandir: Bucky isn't damaged by PTSD. He's damaged by experimentation and brain-washing that turned him into one of Hydra's deadliest agents.

    – Paul D. Waite
    Jul 17 at 13:53












  • 10





    "Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted." - this isn't a great reason at all. Presumably, they were able to remove Bucky's conditioning in Wakanda, since he requested to be asleep until that happened. And such a statement that he's" damaged" is a pretty bad message about PTSD.

    – user58
    Jul 15 at 9:55






  • 5





    I think the angle they were going here is that Bucky undeniably has some darkness in him, and despite (presumably) being no longer affected by the conditioning, he's still been left somewhat damaged and cynical by the whole thing. Captain America (as a persona) is optimistic and never gives up ("I could do this all day"). Sam's outlook is definitely the closest to Cap's attitude to life. Plus, I can't help but spot the parallels between the post-Snap therapy session that Cap was running in Endgame, and the PTSD therapy session that Sam was running back in Winter Soldier. He's a natural choice.

    – anaximander
    Jul 16 at 9:58






  • 2





    they wanted a black cap

    – Pemba Tamang
    Jul 17 at 7:57






  • 3





    @Mithrandir: Bucky isn't damaged by PTSD. He's damaged by experimentation and brain-washing that turned him into one of Hydra's deadliest agents.

    – Paul D. Waite
    Jul 17 at 13:53







10




10





"Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted." - this isn't a great reason at all. Presumably, they were able to remove Bucky's conditioning in Wakanda, since he requested to be asleep until that happened. And such a statement that he's" damaged" is a pretty bad message about PTSD.

– user58
Jul 15 at 9:55





"Bucky is portrayed in the films as very damaged, and not necessarily the guy that you would want to trust with another weapon because he can always be corrupted." - this isn't a great reason at all. Presumably, they were able to remove Bucky's conditioning in Wakanda, since he requested to be asleep until that happened. And such a statement that he's" damaged" is a pretty bad message about PTSD.

– user58
Jul 15 at 9:55




5




5





I think the angle they were going here is that Bucky undeniably has some darkness in him, and despite (presumably) being no longer affected by the conditioning, he's still been left somewhat damaged and cynical by the whole thing. Captain America (as a persona) is optimistic and never gives up ("I could do this all day"). Sam's outlook is definitely the closest to Cap's attitude to life. Plus, I can't help but spot the parallels between the post-Snap therapy session that Cap was running in Endgame, and the PTSD therapy session that Sam was running back in Winter Soldier. He's a natural choice.

– anaximander
Jul 16 at 9:58





I think the angle they were going here is that Bucky undeniably has some darkness in him, and despite (presumably) being no longer affected by the conditioning, he's still been left somewhat damaged and cynical by the whole thing. Captain America (as a persona) is optimistic and never gives up ("I could do this all day"). Sam's outlook is definitely the closest to Cap's attitude to life. Plus, I can't help but spot the parallels between the post-Snap therapy session that Cap was running in Endgame, and the PTSD therapy session that Sam was running back in Winter Soldier. He's a natural choice.

– anaximander
Jul 16 at 9:58




2




2





they wanted a black cap

– Pemba Tamang
Jul 17 at 7:57





they wanted a black cap

– Pemba Tamang
Jul 17 at 7:57




3




3





@Mithrandir: Bucky isn't damaged by PTSD. He's damaged by experimentation and brain-washing that turned him into one of Hydra's deadliest agents.

– Paul D. Waite
Jul 17 at 13:53





@Mithrandir: Bucky isn't damaged by PTSD. He's damaged by experimentation and brain-washing that turned him into one of Hydra's deadliest agents.

– Paul D. Waite
Jul 17 at 13:53



Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?