Single word antonym of “flightless” [closed]Single word antonym of “censorship”Is there a word which describes the experience of not being able to comprehend new sensory input?Single word for “less available” with a corresponding noun and without a cumbersome prefixWhat's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Single word for old and many-times-seen contentWord for a ‘vignette’ on a specific topic within a bookWords to describe electronic informationSingle-word antonym for “cheapest”?Single word antonym of “premature”
Does the deductible apply to each doctor's visit separately or are the costs cumulative over the year?
Are there any “Third Order” acronyms used in space exploration?
What was the ultimate objective of The Party in 1984?
What does "boys rule, girls drool" mean?
Meaning of Swimming their horses
Does a feasible high thrust high specific impulse engine exist using current non space technology?
Teleport everything in a large zone; or teleport all living things and make a lot of equipment disappear
What 68-pin connector is this on my 2.5" solid state drive?
Seven Places at Once - Another Google Earth Challenge?
How do certain apps show new notifications when internet access is restricted to them?
How do we know that black holes are spinning?
An ES6 array of numbers - Double last number, delete the first number
hyperref warns when using cleveref in section
What do these two notes together mean?
How clean are pets?
Is there a tool to measure the "maturity" of a code in Git?
Why any infinite sequence of real functions can be generated from a finite set through composition?
Does a large scratch in an ND filter affect image quality?
What would happen if Protagoras v Euathlus were heard in court today?
Make 2019 with single digits
Unable to find solution to 6 simultaneous equations
Impossible Scrabble Words
Nurikabe minicubes: the Headache, the Panache, the Apache
Asked to Not Use Transactions and to Use A Workaround to Simulate One
Single word antonym of “flightless” [closed]
Single word antonym of “censorship”Is there a word which describes the experience of not being able to comprehend new sensory input?Single word for “less available” with a corresponding noun and without a cumbersome prefixWhat's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Single word for old and many-times-seen contentWord for a ‘vignette’ on a specific topic within a bookWords to describe electronic informationSingle-word antonym for “cheapest”?Single word antonym of “premature”
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.
I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.
I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:
Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.
Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.
Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.
single-word-requests
closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
add a comment
|
Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.
I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.
I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:
Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.
Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.
Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.
single-word-requests
closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
2
The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06
This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35
Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.
– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47
Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.
– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11
add a comment
|
Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.
I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.
I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:
Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.
Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.
Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.
single-word-requests
Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.
I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.
I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:
Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.
Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.
Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
edited Apr 17 at 9:08
Glorfindel
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
asked Apr 15 at 10:07
Dan TempleDan Temple
4945 silver badges12 bronze badges
4945 silver badges12 bronze badges
closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
2
The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06
This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35
Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.
– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47
Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.
– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11
add a comment
|
2
The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06
This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35
Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.
– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47
Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.
– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11
2
2
The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06
The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06
This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35
This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35
Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.
– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47
Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.
– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47
Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.
– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11
Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.
– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11
add a comment
|
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.
It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:
2: flying or capable of flying
(source: Merriam-Webster)
3
If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice
– yunzen
Apr 15 at 11:27
6
It depends on the context what it means exactly.
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 12:55
6
@youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.
– Chris H
Apr 15 at 12:55
5
@youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:34
2
Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 15 at 19:18
|
show 7 more comments
Flighted.
This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.
Edit - reference below:
@WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:
"Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
- adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.
- adv. Flight'ily.
-n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).
1
yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.
– WendyG
Apr 15 at 12:35
@WendyG reference added to answer.
– youcantryreachingme
Apr 15 at 12:42
1
I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 18:46
4
If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 20:57
2
I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted
– HotelCalifornia
Apr 16 at 7:14
|
show 4 more comments
Flighted
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted
flighted
(of birds) Capable of flight.
3
I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 13:41
1
@RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".
– David Richerby
Apr 16 at 12:46
@DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."
– RedSonja
Apr 16 at 13:03
add a comment
|
"Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.
add a comment
|
You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.
Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:46
Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.
– alephzero
Apr 15 at 20:47
3
@alephzero That's not swimming?
– jimm101
Apr 15 at 20:52
@alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 20:59
Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??
– Tarun
Apr 16 at 14:42
add a comment
|
I would call them just
Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:
wing
: one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.
(According to MWD)
6
"Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:01
5
"Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.
– Richard
Apr 15 at 12:09
9
@user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"
– user323578
Apr 15 at 12:21
1
@user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:48
add a comment
|
Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.
Pigeons are flying [birds]
fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say
Pigeons are flying because they can fly
since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.
add a comment
|
In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation
So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals
8
"may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:22
1
Flight-capable.
– Tom Hundt
Apr 15 at 19:19
Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)
– Joshua
Apr 16 at 1:31
3
Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 15:03
add a comment
|
The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.
1
"flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.
– CJ Dennis
Apr 16 at 23:52
add a comment
|
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.
It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:
2: flying or capable of flying
(source: Merriam-Webster)
3
If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice
– yunzen
Apr 15 at 11:27
6
It depends on the context what it means exactly.
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 12:55
6
@youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.
– Chris H
Apr 15 at 12:55
5
@youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:34
2
Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 15 at 19:18
|
show 7 more comments
I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.
It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:
2: flying or capable of flying
(source: Merriam-Webster)
3
If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice
– yunzen
Apr 15 at 11:27
6
It depends on the context what it means exactly.
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 12:55
6
@youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.
– Chris H
Apr 15 at 12:55
5
@youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:34
2
Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 15 at 19:18
|
show 7 more comments
I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.
It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:
2: flying or capable of flying
(source: Merriam-Webster)
I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.
It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:
2: flying or capable of flying
(source: Merriam-Webster)
edited Apr 15 at 12:53
answered Apr 15 at 10:49
GlorfindelGlorfindel
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
3
If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice
– yunzen
Apr 15 at 11:27
6
It depends on the context what it means exactly.
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 12:55
6
@youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.
– Chris H
Apr 15 at 12:55
5
@youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:34
2
Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 15 at 19:18
|
show 7 more comments
3
If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice
– yunzen
Apr 15 at 11:27
6
It depends on the context what it means exactly.
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 12:55
6
@youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.
– Chris H
Apr 15 at 12:55
5
@youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:34
2
Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 15 at 19:18
3
3
If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice
– yunzen
Apr 15 at 11:27
If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice
– yunzen
Apr 15 at 11:27
6
6
It depends on the context what it means exactly.
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 12:55
It depends on the context what it means exactly.
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 12:55
6
6
@youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.
– Chris H
Apr 15 at 12:55
@youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.
– Chris H
Apr 15 at 12:55
5
5
@youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:34
@youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:34
2
2
Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 15 at 19:18
Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...
– Darrel Hoffman
Apr 15 at 19:18
|
show 7 more comments
Flighted.
This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.
Edit - reference below:
@WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:
"Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
- adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.
- adv. Flight'ily.
-n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).
1
yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.
– WendyG
Apr 15 at 12:35
@WendyG reference added to answer.
– youcantryreachingme
Apr 15 at 12:42
1
I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 18:46
4
If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 20:57
2
I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted
– HotelCalifornia
Apr 16 at 7:14
|
show 4 more comments
Flighted.
This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.
Edit - reference below:
@WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:
"Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
- adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.
- adv. Flight'ily.
-n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).
1
yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.
– WendyG
Apr 15 at 12:35
@WendyG reference added to answer.
– youcantryreachingme
Apr 15 at 12:42
1
I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 18:46
4
If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 20:57
2
I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted
– HotelCalifornia
Apr 16 at 7:14
|
show 4 more comments
Flighted.
This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.
Edit - reference below:
@WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:
"Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
- adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.
- adv. Flight'ily.
-n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).
Flighted.
This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.
Edit - reference below:
@WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:
"Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
- adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.
- adv. Flight'ily.
-n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).
edited Apr 15 at 13:07
WendyG
2,0665 silver badges16 bronze badges
2,0665 silver badges16 bronze badges
answered Apr 15 at 11:45
youcantryreachingmeyoucantryreachingme
5581 silver badge6 bronze badges
5581 silver badge6 bronze badges
1
yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.
– WendyG
Apr 15 at 12:35
@WendyG reference added to answer.
– youcantryreachingme
Apr 15 at 12:42
1
I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 18:46
4
If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 20:57
2
I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted
– HotelCalifornia
Apr 16 at 7:14
|
show 4 more comments
1
yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.
– WendyG
Apr 15 at 12:35
@WendyG reference added to answer.
– youcantryreachingme
Apr 15 at 12:42
1
I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 18:46
4
If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 20:57
2
I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted
– HotelCalifornia
Apr 16 at 7:14
1
1
yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.
– WendyG
Apr 15 at 12:35
yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.
– WendyG
Apr 15 at 12:35
@WendyG reference added to answer.
– youcantryreachingme
Apr 15 at 12:42
@WendyG reference added to answer.
– youcantryreachingme
Apr 15 at 12:42
1
1
I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 18:46
I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?
– Glorfindel
Apr 15 at 18:46
4
4
If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 20:57
If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 20:57
2
2
I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted
– HotelCalifornia
Apr 16 at 7:14
I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted
– HotelCalifornia
Apr 16 at 7:14
|
show 4 more comments
Flighted
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted
flighted
(of birds) Capable of flight.
3
I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 13:41
1
@RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".
– David Richerby
Apr 16 at 12:46
@DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."
– RedSonja
Apr 16 at 13:03
add a comment
|
Flighted
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted
flighted
(of birds) Capable of flight.
3
I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 13:41
1
@RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".
– David Richerby
Apr 16 at 12:46
@DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."
– RedSonja
Apr 16 at 13:03
add a comment
|
Flighted
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted
flighted
(of birds) Capable of flight.
Flighted
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted
flighted
(of birds) Capable of flight.
edited Apr 15 at 12:37
Glorfindel
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
answered Apr 15 at 11:44
Lord PeterLord Peter
1,1681 gold badge5 silver badges9 bronze badges
1,1681 gold badge5 silver badges9 bronze badges
3
I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 13:41
1
@RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".
– David Richerby
Apr 16 at 12:46
@DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."
– RedSonja
Apr 16 at 13:03
add a comment
|
3
I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 13:41
1
@RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".
– David Richerby
Apr 16 at 12:46
@DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."
– RedSonja
Apr 16 at 13:03
3
3
I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 13:41
I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 13:41
1
1
@RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".
– David Richerby
Apr 16 at 12:46
@RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".
– David Richerby
Apr 16 at 12:46
@DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."
– RedSonja
Apr 16 at 13:03
@DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."
– RedSonja
Apr 16 at 13:03
add a comment
|
"Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.
add a comment
|
"Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.
add a comment
|
"Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.
"Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.
answered Apr 15 at 18:09
Andrew BealsAndrew Beals
2311 silver badge4 bronze badges
2311 silver badge4 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.
Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:46
Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.
– alephzero
Apr 15 at 20:47
3
@alephzero That's not swimming?
– jimm101
Apr 15 at 20:52
@alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 20:59
Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??
– Tarun
Apr 16 at 14:42
add a comment
|
You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.
Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:46
Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.
– alephzero
Apr 15 at 20:47
3
@alephzero That's not swimming?
– jimm101
Apr 15 at 20:52
@alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 20:59
Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??
– Tarun
Apr 16 at 14:42
add a comment
|
You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.
You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.
edited Apr 16 at 14:43
answered Apr 15 at 13:52
TarunTarun
213 bronze badges
213 bronze badges
Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:46
Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.
– alephzero
Apr 15 at 20:47
3
@alephzero That's not swimming?
– jimm101
Apr 15 at 20:52
@alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 20:59
Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??
– Tarun
Apr 16 at 14:42
add a comment
|
Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:46
Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.
– alephzero
Apr 15 at 20:47
3
@alephzero That's not swimming?
– jimm101
Apr 15 at 20:52
@alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 20:59
Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??
– Tarun
Apr 16 at 14:42
Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:46
Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:46
Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.
– alephzero
Apr 15 at 20:47
Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.
– alephzero
Apr 15 at 20:47
3
3
@alephzero That's not swimming?
– jimm101
Apr 15 at 20:52
@alephzero That's not swimming?
– jimm101
Apr 15 at 20:52
@alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 20:59
@alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 20:59
Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??
– Tarun
Apr 16 at 14:42
Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??
– Tarun
Apr 16 at 14:42
add a comment
|
I would call them just
Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:
wing
: one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.
(According to MWD)
6
"Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:01
5
"Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.
– Richard
Apr 15 at 12:09
9
@user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"
– user323578
Apr 15 at 12:21
1
@user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:48
add a comment
|
I would call them just
Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:
wing
: one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.
(According to MWD)
6
"Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:01
5
"Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.
– Richard
Apr 15 at 12:09
9
@user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"
– user323578
Apr 15 at 12:21
1
@user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:48
add a comment
|
I would call them just
Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:
wing
: one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.
(According to MWD)
I would call them just
Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:
wing
: one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.
(According to MWD)
edited Apr 15 at 10:35
answered Apr 15 at 10:18
user307254user307254
1
1
6
"Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:01
5
"Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.
– Richard
Apr 15 at 12:09
9
@user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"
– user323578
Apr 15 at 12:21
1
@user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:48
add a comment
|
6
"Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:01
5
"Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.
– Richard
Apr 15 at 12:09
9
@user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"
– user323578
Apr 15 at 12:21
1
@user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:48
6
6
"Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:01
"Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:01
5
5
"Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.
– Richard
Apr 15 at 12:09
"Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.
– Richard
Apr 15 at 12:09
9
9
@user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"
– user323578
Apr 15 at 12:21
@user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"
– user323578
Apr 15 at 12:21
1
1
@user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:48
@user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly
– Aethenosity
Apr 15 at 18:48
add a comment
|
Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.
Pigeons are flying [birds]
fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say
Pigeons are flying because they can fly
since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.
add a comment
|
Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.
Pigeons are flying [birds]
fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say
Pigeons are flying because they can fly
since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.
add a comment
|
Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.
Pigeons are flying [birds]
fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say
Pigeons are flying because they can fly
since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.
Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.
Pigeons are flying [birds]
fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say
Pigeons are flying because they can fly
since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.
answered Apr 17 at 0:26
HarperHarper
1,2072 silver badges8 bronze badges
1,2072 silver badges8 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation
So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals
8
"may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:22
1
Flight-capable.
– Tom Hundt
Apr 15 at 19:19
Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)
– Joshua
Apr 16 at 1:31
3
Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 15:03
add a comment
|
In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation
So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals
8
"may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:22
1
Flight-capable.
– Tom Hundt
Apr 15 at 19:19
Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)
– Joshua
Apr 16 at 1:31
3
Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 15:03
add a comment
|
In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation
So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals
In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation
So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals
edited Apr 15 at 12:38
Glorfindel
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges
answered Apr 15 at 11:21
yunzenyunzen
1234 bronze badges
1234 bronze badges
8
"may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:22
1
Flight-capable.
– Tom Hundt
Apr 15 at 19:19
Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)
– Joshua
Apr 16 at 1:31
3
Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 15:03
add a comment
|
8
"may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:22
1
Flight-capable.
– Tom Hundt
Apr 15 at 19:19
Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)
– Joshua
Apr 16 at 1:31
3
Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 15:03
8
8
"may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:22
"may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:22
1
1
Flight-capable.
– Tom Hundt
Apr 15 at 19:19
Flight-capable.
– Tom Hundt
Apr 15 at 19:19
Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)
– Joshua
Apr 16 at 1:31
Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)
– Joshua
Apr 16 at 1:31
3
3
Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 15:03
Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.
– Acccumulation
Apr 16 at 15:03
add a comment
|
The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.
1
"flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.
– CJ Dennis
Apr 16 at 23:52
add a comment
|
The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.
1
"flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.
– CJ Dennis
Apr 16 at 23:52
add a comment
|
The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.
The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.
answered Apr 16 at 20:55
Aled CymroAled Cymro
3161 silver badge5 bronze badges
3161 silver badge5 bronze badges
1
"flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.
– CJ Dennis
Apr 16 at 23:52
add a comment
|
1
"flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.
– CJ Dennis
Apr 16 at 23:52
1
1
"flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.
– CJ Dennis
Apr 16 at 23:52
"flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.
– CJ Dennis
Apr 16 at 23:52
add a comment
|
2
The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...
– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06
This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.
– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35
Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.
– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47
Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.
– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11