Single word antonym of “flightless” [closed]Single word antonym of “censorship”Is there a word which describes the experience of not being able to comprehend new sensory input?Single word for “less available” with a corresponding noun and without a cumbersome prefixWhat's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Single word for old and many-times-seen contentWord for a ‘vignette’ on a specific topic within a bookWords to describe electronic informationSingle-word antonym for “cheapest”?Single word antonym of “premature”

Does the deductible apply to each doctor's visit separately or are the costs cumulative over the year?

Are there any “Third Order” acronyms used in space exploration?

What was the ultimate objective of The Party in 1984?

What does "boys rule, girls drool" mean?

Meaning of Swimming their horses

Does a feasible high thrust high specific impulse engine exist using current non space technology?

Teleport everything in a large zone; or teleport all living things and make a lot of equipment disappear

What 68-pin connector is this on my 2.5" solid state drive?

Seven Places at Once - Another Google Earth Challenge?

How do certain apps show new notifications when internet access is restricted to them?

How do we know that black holes are spinning?

An ES6 array of numbers - Double last number, delete the first number

hyperref warns when using cleveref in section

What do these two notes together mean?

How clean are pets?

Is there a tool to measure the "maturity" of a code in Git?

Why any infinite sequence of real functions can be generated from a finite set through composition?

Does a large scratch in an ND filter affect image quality?

What would happen if Protagoras v Euathlus were heard in court today?

Make 2019 with single digits

Unable to find solution to 6 simultaneous equations

Impossible Scrabble Words

Nurikabe minicubes: the Headache, the Panache, the Apache

Asked to Not Use Transactions and to Use A Workaround to Simulate One



Single word antonym of “flightless” [closed]


Single word antonym of “censorship”Is there a word which describes the experience of not being able to comprehend new sensory input?Single word for “less available” with a corresponding noun and without a cumbersome prefixWhat's a word for someone who wants to voice opinions but not have them challenged?Single word for old and many-times-seen contentWord for a ‘vignette’ on a specific topic within a bookWords to describe electronic informationSingle-word antonym for “cheapest”?Single word antonym of “premature”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








16















Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.



I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.



I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:




Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.



Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.



Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.











share|improve this question
















closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2





    The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...

    – user323578
    Apr 15 at 11:06











  • This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.

    – LarsH
    Apr 15 at 13:35












  • Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.

    – Jim
    Apr 15 at 20:47











  • Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.

    – Bill K
    Apr 16 at 21:11


















16















Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.



I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.



I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:




Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.



Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.



Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.











share|improve this question
















closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2





    The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...

    – user323578
    Apr 15 at 11:06











  • This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.

    – LarsH
    Apr 15 at 13:35












  • Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.

    – Jim
    Apr 15 at 20:47











  • Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.

    – Bill K
    Apr 16 at 21:11














16












16








16








Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.



I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.



I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:




Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.



Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.



Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.











share|improve this question
















Is there a single word to describe birds that can fly? Am I struggling to think of a word because the default notion of a bird is that it can fly? So we generally only need to differentiate the ones that can't fly.



I've seen the term "winged" in a few google searches, but to my mind an ostrich is winged, but it is also flightless.



I guess I'm looking for the word you'd put into this blank:




Penguins are flightless because they cannot fly.



Ostriches are flightless because they cannot fly.



Pigeons are ____ because they can fly.








single-word-requests






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 17 at 9:08









Glorfindel

11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges




11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges










asked Apr 15 at 10:07









Dan TempleDan Temple

4945 silver badges12 bronze badges




4945 silver badges12 bronze badges





closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by lbf, JJJ, Neeku, curiousdannii, Chappo Apr 17 at 5:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, curiousdannii, Chappo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 2





    The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...

    – user323578
    Apr 15 at 11:06











  • This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.

    – LarsH
    Apr 15 at 13:35












  • Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.

    – Jim
    Apr 15 at 20:47











  • Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.

    – Bill K
    Apr 16 at 21:11













  • 2





    The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...

    – user323578
    Apr 15 at 11:06











  • This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.

    – LarsH
    Apr 15 at 13:35












  • Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.

    – Jim
    Apr 15 at 20:47











  • Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.

    – Bill K
    Apr 16 at 21:11








2




2





The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...

– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06





The word "flighted" is commonly used; unfortunately I can't find an acceptable source to include this as an answer...

– user323578
Apr 15 at 11:06













This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.

– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35






This seems a reputable example where "flying birds" is used: books.google.com/… But "Pigeons are flying" (without 'birds') is less clear / more confusing. But it's not clear why you want to use the "Pigeons are [single word]" construction.

– LarsH
Apr 15 at 13:35














Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.

– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47





Pigeons are birds. Birds can fly. Emus are flightless birds because they can't fly.

– Jim
Apr 15 at 20:47













Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.

– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11






Flying is a good answer but I just wanted to point out that the reason it's difficult to find the perfect sounding word is because you generally don't say that a bird is enflightanated or anything like that, birds default to air-worthy and would need to be modified by "Flightless" if not.

– Bill K
Apr 16 at 21:11











9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















36
















I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.



It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:




2: flying or capable of flying




(source: Merriam-Webster)






share|improve this answer






















  • 3





    If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice

    – yunzen
    Apr 15 at 11:27






  • 6





    It depends on the context what it means exactly.

    – Glorfindel
    Apr 15 at 12:55






  • 6





    @youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.

    – Chris H
    Apr 15 at 12:55







  • 5





    @youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)

    – LarsH
    Apr 15 at 13:34






  • 2





    Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...

    – Darrel Hoffman
    Apr 15 at 19:18


















35
















Flighted.



This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.



Edit - reference below:



@WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:



"Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
- adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.



- adv. Flight'ily.
-n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.

    – WendyG
    Apr 15 at 12:35











  • @WendyG reference added to answer.

    – youcantryreachingme
    Apr 15 at 12:42






  • 1





    I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?

    – Glorfindel
    Apr 15 at 18:46







  • 4





    If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.

    – user323578
    Apr 15 at 20:57






  • 2





    I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted

    – HotelCalifornia
    Apr 16 at 7:14


















13
















Flighted



https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted




flighted



(of birds) Capable of flight.







share|improve this answer






















  • 3





    I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".

    – RedSonja
    Apr 15 at 13:41






  • 1





    @RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".

    – David Richerby
    Apr 16 at 12:46











  • @DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."

    – RedSonja
    Apr 16 at 13:03


















10
















"Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.






share|improve this answer
































    2
















    You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.






    share|improve this answer



























    • Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?

      – Aethenosity
      Apr 15 at 18:46












    • Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.

      – alephzero
      Apr 15 at 20:47






    • 3





      @alephzero That's not swimming?

      – jimm101
      Apr 15 at 20:52











    • @alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.

      – Aethenosity
      Apr 15 at 20:59












    • Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??

      – Tarun
      Apr 16 at 14:42


















    0
















    I would call them just
    Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
    which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:



    wing



    : one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.



    (According to MWD)






    share|improve this answer






















    • 6





      "Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.

      – user323578
      Apr 15 at 11:01






    • 5





      "Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.

      – Richard
      Apr 15 at 12:09






    • 9





      @user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"

      – user323578
      Apr 15 at 12:21







    • 1





      @user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly

      – Aethenosity
      Apr 15 at 18:48



















    0
















    Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.




    Pigeons are flying [birds]




    fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say




    Pigeons are flying because they can fly




    since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.






    share|improve this answer
































      -1
















      In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation



      So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals






      share|improve this answer






















      • 8





        "may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.

        – LarsH
        Apr 15 at 13:22






      • 1





        Flight-capable.

        – Tom Hundt
        Apr 15 at 19:19











      • Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)

        – Joshua
        Apr 16 at 1:31






      • 3





        Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.

        – Acccumulation
        Apr 16 at 15:03


















      -1
















      The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        "flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.

        – CJ Dennis
        Apr 16 at 23:52



















      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes








      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      36
















      I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.



      It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:




      2: flying or capable of flying




      (source: Merriam-Webster)






      share|improve this answer






















      • 3





        If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice

        – yunzen
        Apr 15 at 11:27






      • 6





        It depends on the context what it means exactly.

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 12:55






      • 6





        @youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.

        – Chris H
        Apr 15 at 12:55







      • 5





        @youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)

        – LarsH
        Apr 15 at 13:34






      • 2





        Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...

        – Darrel Hoffman
        Apr 15 at 19:18















      36
















      I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.



      It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:




      2: flying or capable of flying




      (source: Merriam-Webster)






      share|improve this answer






















      • 3





        If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice

        – yunzen
        Apr 15 at 11:27






      • 6





        It depends on the context what it means exactly.

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 12:55






      • 6





        @youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.

        – Chris H
        Apr 15 at 12:55







      • 5





        @youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)

        – LarsH
        Apr 15 at 13:34






      • 2





        Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...

        – Darrel Hoffman
        Apr 15 at 19:18













      36














      36










      36









      I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.



      It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:




      2: flying or capable of flying




      (source: Merriam-Webster)






      share|improve this answer















      I think you can just use flying to describe them; flying birds sounds perfectly normal and isn't a tautology, nor does it only apply to birds in the air, cf. the title of the Wikipedia article 'Flying and gliding animals'.



      It's obviously an awkward choice for your example sentence, where another option, volant, could be used instead:




      2: flying or capable of flying




      (source: Merriam-Webster)







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 15 at 12:53

























      answered Apr 15 at 10:49









      GlorfindelGlorfindel

      11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges




      11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges










      • 3





        If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice

        – yunzen
        Apr 15 at 11:27






      • 6





        It depends on the context what it means exactly.

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 12:55






      • 6





        @youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.

        – Chris H
        Apr 15 at 12:55







      • 5





        @youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)

        – LarsH
        Apr 15 at 13:34






      • 2





        Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...

        – Darrel Hoffman
        Apr 15 at 19:18












      • 3





        If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice

        – yunzen
        Apr 15 at 11:27






      • 6





        It depends on the context what it means exactly.

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 12:55






      • 6





        @youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.

        – Chris H
        Apr 15 at 12:55







      • 5





        @youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)

        – LarsH
        Apr 15 at 13:34






      • 2





        Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...

        – Darrel Hoffman
        Apr 15 at 19:18







      3




      3





      If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice

      – yunzen
      Apr 15 at 11:27





      If you think of insects capable of flying, you call them flying insects, so flying seems to is a good choice

      – yunzen
      Apr 15 at 11:27




      6




      6





      It depends on the context what it means exactly.

      – Glorfindel
      Apr 15 at 12:55





      It depends on the context what it means exactly.

      – Glorfindel
      Apr 15 at 12:55




      6




      6





      @youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.

      – Chris H
      Apr 15 at 12:55






      @youcantryreachingme would you have the same objection if somebody described moles as burrowing creatures, or lions as meat-eating mammals? At this moment most moles aren't actively burrowing, and most lions aren't currently engaged in the process of eating meat. Or described the vikings as a sea-faring culture? Most of them spent most of their time on land.

      – Chris H
      Apr 15 at 12:55





      5




      5





      @youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)

      – LarsH
      Apr 15 at 13:34





      @youcantryreachingme The phrase 'flying birds' can mean "birds that are presently in flight," and that might be the more common usage, but "birds that are capable of flight" is certainly a valid usage of the phrase. It might be necessary to establish context to make sure the meaning is understood correctly, as in "The bones of nonflying birds are heavier and less hollow than those of flying birds" (books.google.com/…)

      – LarsH
      Apr 15 at 13:34




      2




      2





      Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...

      – Darrel Hoffman
      Apr 15 at 19:18





      Flying squirrels and flying foxes are other instances of the word being used to describe animals that can fly (or at least glide) even when they are not currently flying. You even see that word used to describe things that never actually fly, such as buttresses or trapezes...

      – Darrel Hoffman
      Apr 15 at 19:18













      35
















      Flighted.



      This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.



      Edit - reference below:



      @WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:



      "Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
      - adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.



      - adv. Flight'ily.
      -n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).






      share|improve this answer






















      • 1





        yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.

        – WendyG
        Apr 15 at 12:35











      • @WendyG reference added to answer.

        – youcantryreachingme
        Apr 15 at 12:42






      • 1





        I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 18:46







      • 4





        If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.

        – user323578
        Apr 15 at 20:57






      • 2





        I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted

        – HotelCalifornia
        Apr 16 at 7:14















      35
















      Flighted.



      This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.



      Edit - reference below:



      @WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:



      "Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
      - adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.



      - adv. Flight'ily.
      -n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).






      share|improve this answer






















      • 1





        yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.

        – WendyG
        Apr 15 at 12:35











      • @WendyG reference added to answer.

        – youcantryreachingme
        Apr 15 at 12:42






      • 1





        I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 18:46







      • 4





        If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.

        – user323578
        Apr 15 at 20:57






      • 2





        I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted

        – HotelCalifornia
        Apr 16 at 7:14













      35














      35










      35









      Flighted.



      This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.



      Edit - reference below:



      @WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:



      "Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
      - adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.



      - adv. Flight'ily.
      -n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).






      share|improve this answer















      Flighted.



      This is the straightforward opposite of flightless.



      Edit - reference below:



      @WendyG Chambers's English Dictionary, Enlarged Edition with supplement containing 39 pages of additional words and phrases, W&R Chambers Limited, Edinburgh 1914:



      "Flight, n. a passing through the air: a soaring: excursion : a sally : a series of steps : a flock of birds flying together : the birds produced in the same season : a volley or shower : act of fleeing : hasty removal.
      - adjs. Flight'ed (Milton), flying ; Flight'y, fanciful : changeable : giddy.



      - adv. Flight'ily.
      -n. Flight'iness. [A.S. flyht - fléogan.] (p 350).







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 15 at 13:07









      WendyG

      2,0665 silver badges16 bronze badges




      2,0665 silver badges16 bronze badges










      answered Apr 15 at 11:45









      youcantryreachingmeyoucantryreachingme

      5581 silver badge6 bronze badges




      5581 silver badge6 bronze badges










      • 1





        yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.

        – WendyG
        Apr 15 at 12:35











      • @WendyG reference added to answer.

        – youcantryreachingme
        Apr 15 at 12:42






      • 1





        I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 18:46







      • 4





        If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.

        – user323578
        Apr 15 at 20:57






      • 2





        I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted

        – HotelCalifornia
        Apr 16 at 7:14












      • 1





        yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.

        – WendyG
        Apr 15 at 12:35











      • @WendyG reference added to answer.

        – youcantryreachingme
        Apr 15 at 12:42






      • 1





        I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?

        – Glorfindel
        Apr 15 at 18:46







      • 4





        If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.

        – user323578
        Apr 15 at 20:57






      • 2





        I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted

        – HotelCalifornia
        Apr 16 at 7:14







      1




      1





      yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.

      – WendyG
      Apr 15 at 12:35





      yep flightless/ flighted. But interestingly I can't find this in "proper" dictionaries.

      – WendyG
      Apr 15 at 12:35













      @WendyG reference added to answer.

      – youcantryreachingme
      Apr 15 at 12:42





      @WendyG reference added to answer.

      – youcantryreachingme
      Apr 15 at 12:42




      1




      1





      I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?

      – Glorfindel
      Apr 15 at 18:46






      I'm not saying that this answer is wrong, but which part of the reference supports the claim that 'flighted' (incidentally, my spelling checker complains about it!) is the opposite of flightless?

      – Glorfindel
      Apr 15 at 18:46





      4




      4





      If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.

      – user323578
      Apr 15 at 20:57





      If you read pretty much any article on flightless birds you will find several uses of "flighted" to describe the "other" birds.

      – user323578
      Apr 15 at 20:57




      2




      2





      I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted

      – HotelCalifornia
      Apr 16 at 7:14





      I'm not sure how acceptable this is as evidence, but it may be worth considering and comparing to the pair sightless_/_sighted

      – HotelCalifornia
      Apr 16 at 7:14











      13
















      Flighted



      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted




      flighted



      (of birds) Capable of flight.







      share|improve this answer






















      • 3





        I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".

        – RedSonja
        Apr 15 at 13:41






      • 1





        @RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".

        – David Richerby
        Apr 16 at 12:46











      • @DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."

        – RedSonja
        Apr 16 at 13:03















      13
















      Flighted



      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted




      flighted



      (of birds) Capable of flight.







      share|improve this answer






















      • 3





        I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".

        – RedSonja
        Apr 15 at 13:41






      • 1





        @RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".

        – David Richerby
        Apr 16 at 12:46











      • @DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."

        – RedSonja
        Apr 16 at 13:03













      13














      13










      13









      Flighted



      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted




      flighted



      (of birds) Capable of flight.







      share|improve this answer















      Flighted



      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flighted




      flighted



      (of birds) Capable of flight.








      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 15 at 12:37









      Glorfindel

      11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges




      11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges










      answered Apr 15 at 11:44









      Lord PeterLord Peter

      1,1681 gold badge5 silver badges9 bronze badges




      1,1681 gold badge5 silver badges9 bronze badges










      • 3





        I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".

        – RedSonja
        Apr 15 at 13:41






      • 1





        @RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".

        – David Richerby
        Apr 16 at 12:46











      • @DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."

        – RedSonja
        Apr 16 at 13:03












      • 3





        I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".

        – RedSonja
        Apr 15 at 13:41






      • 1





        @RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".

        – David Richerby
        Apr 16 at 12:46











      • @DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."

        – RedSonja
        Apr 16 at 13:03







      3




      3





      I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".

      – RedSonja
      Apr 15 at 13:41





      I can't help feeling that it ought to be "flit".

      – RedSonja
      Apr 15 at 13:41




      1




      1





      @RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".

      – David Richerby
      Apr 16 at 12:46





      @RedSonja Ah, but "flit" means to fly in a particular way and I can't help feeling that its past tense ought to be "flat".

      – David Richerby
      Apr 16 at 12:46













      @DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."

      – RedSonja
      Apr 16 at 13:03





      @DavidRicherby To me "flit" means to run away silently, especially if you didn't pay your rent. "A moonlight flit". There is a past tense, "They've flitted."

      – RedSonja
      Apr 16 at 13:03











      10
















      "Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.






      share|improve this answer





























        10
















        "Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.






        share|improve this answer



























          10














          10










          10









          "Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.






          share|improve this answer













          "Volant" would be another choice here, but it's likely to send the reader to a dictionary.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 15 at 18:09









          Andrew BealsAndrew Beals

          2311 silver badge4 bronze badges




          2311 silver badge4 bronze badges
























              2
















              You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.






              share|improve this answer



























              • Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:46












              • Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.

                – alephzero
                Apr 15 at 20:47






              • 3





                @alephzero That's not swimming?

                – jimm101
                Apr 15 at 20:52











              • @alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 20:59












              • Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??

                – Tarun
                Apr 16 at 14:42















              2
















              You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.






              share|improve this answer



























              • Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:46












              • Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.

                – alephzero
                Apr 15 at 20:47






              • 3





                @alephzero That's not swimming?

                – jimm101
                Apr 15 at 20:52











              • @alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 20:59












              • Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??

                – Tarun
                Apr 16 at 14:42













              2














              2










              2









              You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.






              share|improve this answer















              You could say, "Pigeons are flighted" as other users mentioned, or "Pigeons possess the ability of flight". It is not one word, but I guess it's very clear.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 16 at 14:43

























              answered Apr 15 at 13:52









              TarunTarun

              213 bronze badges




              213 bronze badges















              • Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:46












              • Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.

                – alephzero
                Apr 15 at 20:47






              • 3





                @alephzero That's not swimming?

                – jimm101
                Apr 15 at 20:52











              • @alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 20:59












              • Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??

                – Tarun
                Apr 16 at 14:42

















              • Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:46












              • Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.

                – alephzero
                Apr 15 at 20:47






              • 3





                @alephzero That's not swimming?

                – jimm101
                Apr 15 at 20:52











              • @alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 20:59












              • Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??

                – Tarun
                Apr 16 at 14:42
















              Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?

              – Aethenosity
              Apr 15 at 18:46






              Penguins CAN'T fly though. Did you mean pigeons (as that was the blank example in the OP)?

              – Aethenosity
              Apr 15 at 18:46














              Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.

              – alephzero
              Apr 15 at 20:47





              Penguins can fly very well, (i.e. they use their wings to propel themselves) but they only do it under water.

              – alephzero
              Apr 15 at 20:47




              3




              3





              @alephzero That's not swimming?

              – jimm101
              Apr 15 at 20:52





              @alephzero That's not swimming?

              – jimm101
              Apr 15 at 20:52













              @alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.

              – Aethenosity
              Apr 15 at 20:59






              @alephzero while there is one definition that would fit that, contextually we are obviously using this definition: move through the air using wings. But my comment was more curious about why he singled out penguins over the blank sentence which used pigeons. I think it was a mistake, but maybe not.

              – Aethenosity
              Apr 15 at 20:59














              Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??

              – Tarun
              Apr 16 at 14:42





              Yeah that was a mistake but they do propel themselves through water which is a fluid so is it flight??

              – Tarun
              Apr 16 at 14:42











              0
















              I would call them just
              Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
              which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:



              wing



              : one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.



              (According to MWD)






              share|improve this answer






















              • 6





                "Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 11:01






              • 5





                "Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.

                – Richard
                Apr 15 at 12:09






              • 9





                @user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 12:21







              • 1





                @user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:48
















              0
















              I would call them just
              Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
              which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:



              wing



              : one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.



              (According to MWD)






              share|improve this answer






















              • 6





                "Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 11:01






              • 5





                "Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.

                – Richard
                Apr 15 at 12:09






              • 9





                @user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 12:21







              • 1





                @user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:48














              0














              0










              0









              I would call them just
              Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
              which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:



              wing



              : one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.



              (According to MWD)






              share|improve this answer















              I would call them just
              Birds without any adjective like 'flying' because of their definition
              which includes 'wings', and birds' wings are always used for flying:



              wing



              : one of the movable feathered or membranous paired appendages by means of which a bird, bat, or insect is able to fly.



              (According to MWD)







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 15 at 10:35

























              answered Apr 15 at 10:18









              user307254user307254

              1




              1










              • 6





                "Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 11:01






              • 5





                "Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.

                – Richard
                Apr 15 at 12:09






              • 9





                @user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 12:21







              • 1





                @user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:48













              • 6





                "Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 11:01






              • 5





                "Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.

                – Richard
                Apr 15 at 12:09






              • 9





                @user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"

                – user323578
                Apr 15 at 12:21







              • 1





                @user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly

                – Aethenosity
                Apr 15 at 18:48








              6




              6





              "Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.

              – user323578
              Apr 15 at 11:01





              "Birds wings are always used for flying"? Not true. Most, maybe all, flightless birds have wings.

              – user323578
              Apr 15 at 11:01




              5




              5





              "Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.

              – Richard
              Apr 15 at 12:09





              "Pigeons are birds because they can fly." Not really a good fit.

              – Richard
              Apr 15 at 12:09




              9




              9





              @user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"

              – user323578
              Apr 15 at 12:21






              @user307254 Better. They are certainly not always used for flying. But it is still no use as an answer to the question: "What is the opposite of flightless birds?" / "Birds with wings" / "Like penguins?" / "No. Other birds with wings." / "Emu?"

              – user323578
              Apr 15 at 12:21





              1




              1





              @user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly

              – Aethenosity
              Apr 15 at 18:48






              @user307254 just because it is the first and natural function of some birds (where it is NOT for others) doesn't mean that they are ONLY for flying. The first and natural function of wings for a penguin, ostrich, kiwi, cassowary, etc is NOT to fly

              – Aethenosity
              Apr 15 at 18:48












              0
















              Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.




              Pigeons are flying [birds]




              fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say




              Pigeons are flying because they can fly




              since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.






              share|improve this answer





























                0
















                Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.




                Pigeons are flying [birds]




                fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say




                Pigeons are flying because they can fly




                since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.






                share|improve this answer



























                  0














                  0










                  0









                  Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.




                  Pigeons are flying [birds]




                  fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say




                  Pigeons are flying because they can fly




                  since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Simply, "Flying" is a very strong word that says what you want. It's not obvious, because your quest for a plug-in unit replacement for flightless it has thrown you off-course. "Flying" is so strong it requires adapting the sentence.




                  Pigeons are flying [birds]




                  fullstop. You might fill in the implied noun. The "plug-in" idea doesn't work: you wouldn't say




                  Pigeons are flying because they can fly




                  since there's an obvious redundancy, which you would eliminate or restyle.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 17 at 0:26









                  HarperHarper

                  1,2072 silver badges8 bronze badges




                  1,2072 silver badges8 bronze badges
























                      -1
















                      In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation



                      So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • 8





                        "may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.

                        – LarsH
                        Apr 15 at 13:22






                      • 1





                        Flight-capable.

                        – Tom Hundt
                        Apr 15 at 19:19











                      • Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)

                        – Joshua
                        Apr 16 at 1:31






                      • 3





                        Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.

                        – Acccumulation
                        Apr 16 at 15:03















                      -1
















                      In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation



                      So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • 8





                        "may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.

                        – LarsH
                        Apr 15 at 13:22






                      • 1





                        Flight-capable.

                        – Tom Hundt
                        Apr 15 at 19:19











                      • Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)

                        – Joshua
                        Apr 16 at 1:31






                      • 3





                        Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.

                        – Acccumulation
                        Apr 16 at 15:03













                      -1














                      -1










                      -1









                      In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation



                      So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals






                      share|improve this answer















                      In German we have it easy: 'flugfähig' and 'flugunfähig'. Deepl gave me this translation



                      So it might be airworthy you are searching for, though it may only be used for contraptions and not for animals







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Apr 15 at 12:38









                      Glorfindel

                      11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges




                      11.9k12 gold badges50 silver badges49 bronze badges










                      answered Apr 15 at 11:21









                      yunzenyunzen

                      1234 bronze badges




                      1234 bronze badges










                      • 8





                        "may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.

                        – LarsH
                        Apr 15 at 13:22






                      • 1





                        Flight-capable.

                        – Tom Hundt
                        Apr 15 at 19:19











                      • Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)

                        – Joshua
                        Apr 16 at 1:31






                      • 3





                        Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.

                        – Acccumulation
                        Apr 16 at 15:03












                      • 8





                        "may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.

                        – LarsH
                        Apr 15 at 13:22






                      • 1





                        Flight-capable.

                        – Tom Hundt
                        Apr 15 at 19:19











                      • Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)

                        – Joshua
                        Apr 16 at 1:31






                      • 3





                        Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.

                        – Acccumulation
                        Apr 16 at 15:03







                      8




                      8





                      "may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.

                      – LarsH
                      Apr 15 at 13:22





                      "may only be used for contraptions and not for animals." Yeah, airworthy birds would at best be seen as a humorous expression.

                      – LarsH
                      Apr 15 at 13:22




                      1




                      1





                      Flight-capable.

                      – Tom Hundt
                      Apr 15 at 19:19





                      Flight-capable.

                      – Tom Hundt
                      Apr 15 at 19:19













                      Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)

                      – Joshua
                      Apr 16 at 1:31





                      Flightworthy... (I see it without any dash in my circles)

                      – Joshua
                      Apr 16 at 1:31




                      3




                      3





                      Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.

                      – Acccumulation
                      Apr 16 at 15:03





                      Airworthy mean not merely that it can fly, but that it should. For instance the Boeing 737 Max can fly, but it's not airworthy.

                      – Acccumulation
                      Apr 16 at 15:03











                      -1
















                      The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.






                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 1





                        "flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.

                        – CJ Dennis
                        Apr 16 at 23:52















                      -1
















                      The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.






                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 1





                        "flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.

                        – CJ Dennis
                        Apr 16 at 23:52













                      -1














                      -1










                      -1









                      The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.






                      share|improve this answer













                      The dodo was a kind of pigeon but lacking the need to escape predators was flightless. Pigeons in countries where predation is a danger are flying birds. So my suggestion is "flying". That is the best I can do. We can talk about the walking wounded or about talking stones and have those adjectives understood. To talk about a flying bird sounds strange but words become acceptable through use.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 16 at 20:55









                      Aled CymroAled Cymro

                      3161 silver badge5 bronze badges




                      3161 silver badge5 bronze badges










                      • 1





                        "flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.

                        – CJ Dennis
                        Apr 16 at 23:52












                      • 1





                        "flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.

                        – CJ Dennis
                        Apr 16 at 23:52







                      1




                      1





                      "flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.

                      – CJ Dennis
                      Apr 16 at 23:52





                      "flying" has already been suggested and is a highly up-voted answer. This answer adds nothing new.

                      – CJ Dennis
                      Apr 16 at 23:52



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                      Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                      Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?