How could a satellite follow earth around the sun while staying outside of earth's orbit?Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?How deep is the force well of L4 and L5 Lagrangian Points of Earth-Sun set?How does the gravity of a massive non-spherical object act on things around it?What is the average intensity of sunlight on the Venerean surface?Can a satellite orbit Earth so that it always has the Moon in line of sight?Will SMAP produce predictable satellite flares visible to the naked eye from the surface of the Earth?Why was Kepler's orbit chosen to continue to drift away from Earth?Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?What could a High Earth Orbit be used for in practice?How much of a rocket's energy is used to achieve altitude vs horizontal velocity?Why put X-ray telescope Spektr-RG/eROSITA all the way out at Sun-Earth L2?
Log user out after change of IP address?
Is a turbocharged piston aircraft the same thing as turboprop?
What are the reasons OR industry projects fail?
Is it possible to be admitted to CS PhD programs (in US) with scholarship at age 18?
English equivalent of the Malayalam saying "don't stab/poke the dead body"?
I created the game tic tac toe in java in the console
How does an all-female medieval country maintain itself?
Players who play fast in longer time control games
Cheat at Rock-Paper-Scissors-Lizard-Spock
POSIX catch newline in case statement
Fast symmetric key cryptography class
Washing the skin of a dead rat
"The" for the first time only
Complex numbers question - sum of three complex numbers
A Caesar cipher in Python3
Security risks of user generated HTML?
Does there exist a surjective group homomorphism from G to H such that G doesn't contain a subgroup isomorphic to H?
Setting PS1 color
What does it take to make metal music?
How to deal with a 6 year old who was "caught" cheating?
Is there evidence for Col. Vindman being a "Never Trumper"?
Is there an integrated terminal option in file managers such as Nautilus in Ubuntu?
Which Formula One races did Scuderia Ferrari not take part in?
How often to check credit card statement
How could a satellite follow earth around the sun while staying outside of earth's orbit?
Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?How deep is the force well of L4 and L5 Lagrangian Points of Earth-Sun set?How does the gravity of a massive non-spherical object act on things around it?What is the average intensity of sunlight on the Venerean surface?Can a satellite orbit Earth so that it always has the Moon in line of sight?Will SMAP produce predictable satellite flares visible to the naked eye from the surface of the Earth?Why was Kepler's orbit chosen to continue to drift away from Earth?Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?What could a High Earth Orbit be used for in practice?How much of a rocket's energy is used to achieve altitude vs horizontal velocity?Why put X-ray telescope Spektr-RG/eROSITA all the way out at Sun-Earth L2?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if its possible for a satellite to follow earth around the sun while staying outside of its orbit. I wondering for the sake of space based solar infrastructure or just something constantly obstructing sunlight getting to earth.
I read something about objects in L4 or L5 zone taking about a year to orbit earth. I assume that might produce a similar result for what I'm looking for, and maybe its simpler? I'm having a hard time finding information about man made objects orbiting the sun, mostly because of mars trajectories articles.
orbital-mechanics artificial-satellite orbit solar-power
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if its possible for a satellite to follow earth around the sun while staying outside of its orbit. I wondering for the sake of space based solar infrastructure or just something constantly obstructing sunlight getting to earth.
I read something about objects in L4 or L5 zone taking about a year to orbit earth. I assume that might produce a similar result for what I'm looking for, and maybe its simpler? I'm having a hard time finding information about man made objects orbiting the sun, mostly because of mars trajectories articles.
orbital-mechanics artificial-satellite orbit solar-power
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
related but different question: Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 0:10
1
$begingroup$
Do you need a completely black shadow to reach earth? Or do you just want to reduce the energy reaching the earth?
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
Jun 27 at 2:30
$begingroup$
I rolled back your previous edit because it changes the scope of the question and invalidates the answers which were already posted. If you have a followup question, please accept the answer you got and post your followup question as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jun 27 at 11:42
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if its possible for a satellite to follow earth around the sun while staying outside of its orbit. I wondering for the sake of space based solar infrastructure or just something constantly obstructing sunlight getting to earth.
I read something about objects in L4 or L5 zone taking about a year to orbit earth. I assume that might produce a similar result for what I'm looking for, and maybe its simpler? I'm having a hard time finding information about man made objects orbiting the sun, mostly because of mars trajectories articles.
orbital-mechanics artificial-satellite orbit solar-power
$endgroup$
I'm wondering if its possible for a satellite to follow earth around the sun while staying outside of its orbit. I wondering for the sake of space based solar infrastructure or just something constantly obstructing sunlight getting to earth.
I read something about objects in L4 or L5 zone taking about a year to orbit earth. I assume that might produce a similar result for what I'm looking for, and maybe its simpler? I'm having a hard time finding information about man made objects orbiting the sun, mostly because of mars trajectories articles.
orbital-mechanics artificial-satellite orbit solar-power
orbital-mechanics artificial-satellite orbit solar-power
edited Jun 27 at 13:03
Machavity
3,2701 gold badge10 silver badges42 bronze badges
3,2701 gold badge10 silver badges42 bronze badges
asked Jun 26 at 15:15
JeffyxJeffyx
381 silver badge7 bronze badges
381 silver badge7 bronze badges
$begingroup$
related but different question: Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 0:10
1
$begingroup$
Do you need a completely black shadow to reach earth? Or do you just want to reduce the energy reaching the earth?
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
Jun 27 at 2:30
$begingroup$
I rolled back your previous edit because it changes the scope of the question and invalidates the answers which were already posted. If you have a followup question, please accept the answer you got and post your followup question as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jun 27 at 11:42
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
related but different question: Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 0:10
1
$begingroup$
Do you need a completely black shadow to reach earth? Or do you just want to reduce the energy reaching the earth?
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
Jun 27 at 2:30
$begingroup$
I rolled back your previous edit because it changes the scope of the question and invalidates the answers which were already posted. If you have a followup question, please accept the answer you got and post your followup question as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jun 27 at 11:42
$begingroup$
related but different question: Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 0:10
$begingroup$
related but different question: Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 0:10
1
1
$begingroup$
Do you need a completely black shadow to reach earth? Or do you just want to reduce the energy reaching the earth?
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
Jun 27 at 2:30
$begingroup$
Do you need a completely black shadow to reach earth? Or do you just want to reduce the energy reaching the earth?
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
Jun 27 at 2:30
$begingroup$
I rolled back your previous edit because it changes the scope of the question and invalidates the answers which were already posted. If you have a followup question, please accept the answer you got and post your followup question as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jun 27 at 11:42
$begingroup$
I rolled back your previous edit because it changes the scope of the question and invalidates the answers which were already posted. If you have a followup question, please accept the answer you got and post your followup question as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jun 27 at 11:42
add a comment
|
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If I understand the question as it is evolving, you are looking for an orbit that produces a solar eclipse; a complete shadow of the Sun on a small area of the Earth, and further that the object casting the shadow not be in an orbit around the Earth as in the question Is a sun-blocking orbit possible? but instead be in a heliocentric orbit.
That would mean that your object needs to produce an umbra at the Earth's surface, not just a penumbra.
Sun-Earth L1
Other answers have already pointed out that an object in a heliocentric orbit near Sun-Earth L1 would satisfy the orbital conditions:
Source
Remaining at Sun-Earth L1
In order to stay near Sun-Earth L1, the spacecraft would have to perform some station-keeping propulsive maneuvers using thrust. That could come from a rocket engine or ion engine or from a solar sail or some kind of electromagnetic sail producing thrust from the charged particles from the solar wind.
But how big would it have to be to produce an umbra on Earth?
Sun-Earth L1 is about 1.5 million kilometers from Earth. That is 1% of the distance from the Earth to the Sun. So the object would have to be 1% of the Sun's diameter to produce an umbra from SE L1. The Sun is about 1.4 million kilometers in diameter, so your object would have to be 1% of that or about 14,000 kilometers wide in order to cast a complete shadow of the Sun on Earth.
That's pretty big!
Source
Source: TimeAndDate.com's Umbra, Penumbra, and Antumbra: Why Are There 3 Shadows?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I had no idea how shadows from space worked, but now I do!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:34
1
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx great! Space is big!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 13:11
$begingroup$
It's more than "pretty big", it's slightly larger in diameter than the Earth, since the Earth is about 0.009 Sun radii.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Jun 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@uhoh Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
$endgroup$
– chrylis -on strike-
Jun 27 at 19:37
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The only stable points that orbit at the same speed as Earth are the L4 and L5 points, as you mention, but there are some unstable ones as well. See this pic from NASA:
L4 and L5 remain ahead of and behind the Earth, whereas L1, L2 and L3 are inherently unstable. From your question, I'd suggest L4 and L5 would be best suited, unless you really need proximity to Earth, in which case L2 could suit your needs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, I think i understand Lagrangian points better now. Looking at the picture it looks like an object in L2 doesn't block light from earth. A quicker way to ask my question would be, "How to we keep an object in L1 so it blocks light from getting to earth".
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
Well, you'd also need to make it an incredibly large object... And you should probably check to see if there are any posts here already on maintaining L1-L3 orbits
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
Jun 26 at 16:57
$begingroup$
Will do, also I should clarify it doesn't have to cast a shadow entirely over earth. Its shadow just has to reach earth.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 17:00
5
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx L1 is located 1.5 million km away from Earth. The Moon is about 0.4 million km away, and is barely large enough to cast a shadow during eclipses. So, your object should be roughly 4 times larger than the Moon. Good luck with that.
$endgroup$
– IMil
Jun 27 at 0:59
$begingroup$
one problem with L2 is that you end up in the shadow of the earth
$endgroup$
– njzk2
Jun 27 at 6:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Note: the question has been radically re-written since this answer was written. Consequently, it is no longer relevant to the question.
If you want an object to stay between the Sun and Earth, it has to be at the Earth-Sun L1 point, which is about 1.5 million km away. We already have stuff there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_and_Heliospheric_Observatory
At L1, you can arrange for your object to cross the Sun from the perspective of any point on Earth. However, this is different than casting a shadow on Earth. In order to cast a shadow, you'll need your object to have at least the same angular size as the Sun, as seem from Earth. Conveniently, the Moon has approximately the same angular size as the Sun, and it's only 384,400 km away. In order to have to be able to eclipse the sun from L1, your object will need to be substantially larger than the Moon.
Now that we're talking about something enormous, the physics of Lagrange points comes into play. They're only stable(-ish) for objects of negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. SOHO has negligible mass compared to the Earth and the Sun. A sun-shade several times the diameter of the Moon probably doesn't. You could try making it a disc rather than a sphere (to keep its mass down), but I expect that tidal forces would spin it out of alignment quite quickly. Its mass will also noticeably affect Earth's orbit, changing the position of the Earth-Sun L1. You'll end up with a complicated gravitational dance as both Earth and your object try to share a similar orbit. Possible outcomes include:
- The object collides with Earth.
- The object collides with the Moon
- The Moon gets tugged into a much more elliptical orbit, resulting in far higher tides that make a giant mess on Earth.
- The Moon gets ejected from Earth orbit, possibly colliding with Earth.
- The object gets ejected into an elliptical orbit around the Sun, where it probably eventually collides with Earth, Venus, or Mars. Meanwhile, Earth ends up in a somewhat lower orbit and more elliptical orbit, throwing another big wrench into the climate.
- Some combination of the above catastrophes, which may involve the object being a temporary second moon for a while.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
L1 through L3 aren't stable even if the object does have negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. Only L4 and L5 (the equitriangular L-points) are stable locations long-term.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Jun 27 at 1:22
$begingroup$
@Sean: True. But for such a large object, the instabilities of L1 through L3 aren't going to come into play. The physics of Lagrange points simply doesn't apply at all.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 1:29
$begingroup$
I don't see a major problem with a hollow, spinning sphere. Spinning keeps it from collapsing under its own gravity, and being hollow makes it several orders of magnitude lighter than the moon.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Jun 27 at 8:25
$begingroup$
I had no idea how large something had to be to cast a true shadow, thank you for all the information!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:33
$begingroup$
@MSalters: Ok, that could work. It'll still be a huge mass for station-keeping in an unstable L1, but it's probably not heavy enough to significantly destabilize the Earth-Sun system and it has lots of surface area to gather energy.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 16:37
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You're on the right track looking up Lagrangian points, orbits where a small object can stay in the same relationship with two celestial bodies, one orbiting another. The one you are describing is the earth-sun L2 point, a point outside of earth's orbit around the sun. This Wikipedia page will tell you more.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, this was helpful for me figuring out my correct question.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:59
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
With engines!
Orbiting at L1 is completely feasible, as long as your satellite regularly uses little bursts from its engines to keep it there. L1 is "unstable", meaning that a satellite without engines will eventually drift away from L1. But the closer your satellite stays to L1, the less fuel it requires to stay in place. Low thrust, high specific impulse engines such as ion thrusters are often used to keep satellites in the right orbit.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36969%2fhow-could-a-satellite-follow-earth-around-the-sun-while-staying-outside-of-earth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If I understand the question as it is evolving, you are looking for an orbit that produces a solar eclipse; a complete shadow of the Sun on a small area of the Earth, and further that the object casting the shadow not be in an orbit around the Earth as in the question Is a sun-blocking orbit possible? but instead be in a heliocentric orbit.
That would mean that your object needs to produce an umbra at the Earth's surface, not just a penumbra.
Sun-Earth L1
Other answers have already pointed out that an object in a heliocentric orbit near Sun-Earth L1 would satisfy the orbital conditions:
Source
Remaining at Sun-Earth L1
In order to stay near Sun-Earth L1, the spacecraft would have to perform some station-keeping propulsive maneuvers using thrust. That could come from a rocket engine or ion engine or from a solar sail or some kind of electromagnetic sail producing thrust from the charged particles from the solar wind.
But how big would it have to be to produce an umbra on Earth?
Sun-Earth L1 is about 1.5 million kilometers from Earth. That is 1% of the distance from the Earth to the Sun. So the object would have to be 1% of the Sun's diameter to produce an umbra from SE L1. The Sun is about 1.4 million kilometers in diameter, so your object would have to be 1% of that or about 14,000 kilometers wide in order to cast a complete shadow of the Sun on Earth.
That's pretty big!
Source
Source: TimeAndDate.com's Umbra, Penumbra, and Antumbra: Why Are There 3 Shadows?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I had no idea how shadows from space worked, but now I do!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:34
1
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx great! Space is big!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 13:11
$begingroup$
It's more than "pretty big", it's slightly larger in diameter than the Earth, since the Earth is about 0.009 Sun radii.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Jun 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@uhoh Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
$endgroup$
– chrylis -on strike-
Jun 27 at 19:37
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If I understand the question as it is evolving, you are looking for an orbit that produces a solar eclipse; a complete shadow of the Sun on a small area of the Earth, and further that the object casting the shadow not be in an orbit around the Earth as in the question Is a sun-blocking orbit possible? but instead be in a heliocentric orbit.
That would mean that your object needs to produce an umbra at the Earth's surface, not just a penumbra.
Sun-Earth L1
Other answers have already pointed out that an object in a heliocentric orbit near Sun-Earth L1 would satisfy the orbital conditions:
Source
Remaining at Sun-Earth L1
In order to stay near Sun-Earth L1, the spacecraft would have to perform some station-keeping propulsive maneuvers using thrust. That could come from a rocket engine or ion engine or from a solar sail or some kind of electromagnetic sail producing thrust from the charged particles from the solar wind.
But how big would it have to be to produce an umbra on Earth?
Sun-Earth L1 is about 1.5 million kilometers from Earth. That is 1% of the distance from the Earth to the Sun. So the object would have to be 1% of the Sun's diameter to produce an umbra from SE L1. The Sun is about 1.4 million kilometers in diameter, so your object would have to be 1% of that or about 14,000 kilometers wide in order to cast a complete shadow of the Sun on Earth.
That's pretty big!
Source
Source: TimeAndDate.com's Umbra, Penumbra, and Antumbra: Why Are There 3 Shadows?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I had no idea how shadows from space worked, but now I do!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:34
1
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx great! Space is big!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 13:11
$begingroup$
It's more than "pretty big", it's slightly larger in diameter than the Earth, since the Earth is about 0.009 Sun radii.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Jun 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@uhoh Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
$endgroup$
– chrylis -on strike-
Jun 27 at 19:37
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If I understand the question as it is evolving, you are looking for an orbit that produces a solar eclipse; a complete shadow of the Sun on a small area of the Earth, and further that the object casting the shadow not be in an orbit around the Earth as in the question Is a sun-blocking orbit possible? but instead be in a heliocentric orbit.
That would mean that your object needs to produce an umbra at the Earth's surface, not just a penumbra.
Sun-Earth L1
Other answers have already pointed out that an object in a heliocentric orbit near Sun-Earth L1 would satisfy the orbital conditions:
Source
Remaining at Sun-Earth L1
In order to stay near Sun-Earth L1, the spacecraft would have to perform some station-keeping propulsive maneuvers using thrust. That could come from a rocket engine or ion engine or from a solar sail or some kind of electromagnetic sail producing thrust from the charged particles from the solar wind.
But how big would it have to be to produce an umbra on Earth?
Sun-Earth L1 is about 1.5 million kilometers from Earth. That is 1% of the distance from the Earth to the Sun. So the object would have to be 1% of the Sun's diameter to produce an umbra from SE L1. The Sun is about 1.4 million kilometers in diameter, so your object would have to be 1% of that or about 14,000 kilometers wide in order to cast a complete shadow of the Sun on Earth.
That's pretty big!
Source
Source: TimeAndDate.com's Umbra, Penumbra, and Antumbra: Why Are There 3 Shadows?
$endgroup$
If I understand the question as it is evolving, you are looking for an orbit that produces a solar eclipse; a complete shadow of the Sun on a small area of the Earth, and further that the object casting the shadow not be in an orbit around the Earth as in the question Is a sun-blocking orbit possible? but instead be in a heliocentric orbit.
That would mean that your object needs to produce an umbra at the Earth's surface, not just a penumbra.
Sun-Earth L1
Other answers have already pointed out that an object in a heliocentric orbit near Sun-Earth L1 would satisfy the orbital conditions:
Source
Remaining at Sun-Earth L1
In order to stay near Sun-Earth L1, the spacecraft would have to perform some station-keeping propulsive maneuvers using thrust. That could come from a rocket engine or ion engine or from a solar sail or some kind of electromagnetic sail producing thrust from the charged particles from the solar wind.
But how big would it have to be to produce an umbra on Earth?
Sun-Earth L1 is about 1.5 million kilometers from Earth. That is 1% of the distance from the Earth to the Sun. So the object would have to be 1% of the Sun's diameter to produce an umbra from SE L1. The Sun is about 1.4 million kilometers in diameter, so your object would have to be 1% of that or about 14,000 kilometers wide in order to cast a complete shadow of the Sun on Earth.
That's pretty big!
Source
Source: TimeAndDate.com's Umbra, Penumbra, and Antumbra: Why Are There 3 Shadows?
edited Jun 27 at 0:48
answered Jun 27 at 0:42
uhohuhoh
55.7k26 gold badges219 silver badges698 bronze badges
55.7k26 gold badges219 silver badges698 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
I had no idea how shadows from space worked, but now I do!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:34
1
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx great! Space is big!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 13:11
$begingroup$
It's more than "pretty big", it's slightly larger in diameter than the Earth, since the Earth is about 0.009 Sun radii.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Jun 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@uhoh Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
$endgroup$
– chrylis -on strike-
Jun 27 at 19:37
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
I had no idea how shadows from space worked, but now I do!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:34
1
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx great! Space is big!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 13:11
$begingroup$
It's more than "pretty big", it's slightly larger in diameter than the Earth, since the Earth is about 0.009 Sun radii.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Jun 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@uhoh Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
$endgroup$
– chrylis -on strike-
Jun 27 at 19:37
1
1
$begingroup$
I had no idea how shadows from space worked, but now I do!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:34
$begingroup$
I had no idea how shadows from space worked, but now I do!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:34
1
1
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx great! Space is big!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 13:11
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx great! Space is big!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 13:11
$begingroup$
It's more than "pretty big", it's slightly larger in diameter than the Earth, since the Earth is about 0.009 Sun radii.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Jun 27 at 17:14
$begingroup$
It's more than "pretty big", it's slightly larger in diameter than the Earth, since the Earth is about 0.009 Sun radii.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Jun 27 at 17:14
1
1
$begingroup$
@uhoh Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
$endgroup$
– chrylis -on strike-
Jun 27 at 19:37
$begingroup$
@uhoh Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
$endgroup$
– chrylis -on strike-
Jun 27 at 19:37
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The only stable points that orbit at the same speed as Earth are the L4 and L5 points, as you mention, but there are some unstable ones as well. See this pic from NASA:
L4 and L5 remain ahead of and behind the Earth, whereas L1, L2 and L3 are inherently unstable. From your question, I'd suggest L4 and L5 would be best suited, unless you really need proximity to Earth, in which case L2 could suit your needs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, I think i understand Lagrangian points better now. Looking at the picture it looks like an object in L2 doesn't block light from earth. A quicker way to ask my question would be, "How to we keep an object in L1 so it blocks light from getting to earth".
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
Well, you'd also need to make it an incredibly large object... And you should probably check to see if there are any posts here already on maintaining L1-L3 orbits
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
Jun 26 at 16:57
$begingroup$
Will do, also I should clarify it doesn't have to cast a shadow entirely over earth. Its shadow just has to reach earth.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 17:00
5
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx L1 is located 1.5 million km away from Earth. The Moon is about 0.4 million km away, and is barely large enough to cast a shadow during eclipses. So, your object should be roughly 4 times larger than the Moon. Good luck with that.
$endgroup$
– IMil
Jun 27 at 0:59
$begingroup$
one problem with L2 is that you end up in the shadow of the earth
$endgroup$
– njzk2
Jun 27 at 6:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The only stable points that orbit at the same speed as Earth are the L4 and L5 points, as you mention, but there are some unstable ones as well. See this pic from NASA:
L4 and L5 remain ahead of and behind the Earth, whereas L1, L2 and L3 are inherently unstable. From your question, I'd suggest L4 and L5 would be best suited, unless you really need proximity to Earth, in which case L2 could suit your needs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, I think i understand Lagrangian points better now. Looking at the picture it looks like an object in L2 doesn't block light from earth. A quicker way to ask my question would be, "How to we keep an object in L1 so it blocks light from getting to earth".
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
Well, you'd also need to make it an incredibly large object... And you should probably check to see if there are any posts here already on maintaining L1-L3 orbits
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
Jun 26 at 16:57
$begingroup$
Will do, also I should clarify it doesn't have to cast a shadow entirely over earth. Its shadow just has to reach earth.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 17:00
5
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx L1 is located 1.5 million km away from Earth. The Moon is about 0.4 million km away, and is barely large enough to cast a shadow during eclipses. So, your object should be roughly 4 times larger than the Moon. Good luck with that.
$endgroup$
– IMil
Jun 27 at 0:59
$begingroup$
one problem with L2 is that you end up in the shadow of the earth
$endgroup$
– njzk2
Jun 27 at 6:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The only stable points that orbit at the same speed as Earth are the L4 and L5 points, as you mention, but there are some unstable ones as well. See this pic from NASA:
L4 and L5 remain ahead of and behind the Earth, whereas L1, L2 and L3 are inherently unstable. From your question, I'd suggest L4 and L5 would be best suited, unless you really need proximity to Earth, in which case L2 could suit your needs.
$endgroup$
The only stable points that orbit at the same speed as Earth are the L4 and L5 points, as you mention, but there are some unstable ones as well. See this pic from NASA:
L4 and L5 remain ahead of and behind the Earth, whereas L1, L2 and L3 are inherently unstable. From your question, I'd suggest L4 and L5 would be best suited, unless you really need proximity to Earth, in which case L2 could suit your needs.
answered Jun 26 at 16:48
Rory AlsopRory Alsop
10.9k2 gold badges46 silver badges73 bronze badges
10.9k2 gold badges46 silver badges73 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thank you, I think i understand Lagrangian points better now. Looking at the picture it looks like an object in L2 doesn't block light from earth. A quicker way to ask my question would be, "How to we keep an object in L1 so it blocks light from getting to earth".
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
Well, you'd also need to make it an incredibly large object... And you should probably check to see if there are any posts here already on maintaining L1-L3 orbits
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
Jun 26 at 16:57
$begingroup$
Will do, also I should clarify it doesn't have to cast a shadow entirely over earth. Its shadow just has to reach earth.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 17:00
5
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx L1 is located 1.5 million km away from Earth. The Moon is about 0.4 million km away, and is barely large enough to cast a shadow during eclipses. So, your object should be roughly 4 times larger than the Moon. Good luck with that.
$endgroup$
– IMil
Jun 27 at 0:59
$begingroup$
one problem with L2 is that you end up in the shadow of the earth
$endgroup$
– njzk2
Jun 27 at 6:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Thank you, I think i understand Lagrangian points better now. Looking at the picture it looks like an object in L2 doesn't block light from earth. A quicker way to ask my question would be, "How to we keep an object in L1 so it blocks light from getting to earth".
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
Well, you'd also need to make it an incredibly large object... And you should probably check to see if there are any posts here already on maintaining L1-L3 orbits
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
Jun 26 at 16:57
$begingroup$
Will do, also I should clarify it doesn't have to cast a shadow entirely over earth. Its shadow just has to reach earth.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 17:00
5
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx L1 is located 1.5 million km away from Earth. The Moon is about 0.4 million km away, and is barely large enough to cast a shadow during eclipses. So, your object should be roughly 4 times larger than the Moon. Good luck with that.
$endgroup$
– IMil
Jun 27 at 0:59
$begingroup$
one problem with L2 is that you end up in the shadow of the earth
$endgroup$
– njzk2
Jun 27 at 6:17
$begingroup$
Thank you, I think i understand Lagrangian points better now. Looking at the picture it looks like an object in L2 doesn't block light from earth. A quicker way to ask my question would be, "How to we keep an object in L1 so it blocks light from getting to earth".
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:53
$begingroup$
Thank you, I think i understand Lagrangian points better now. Looking at the picture it looks like an object in L2 doesn't block light from earth. A quicker way to ask my question would be, "How to we keep an object in L1 so it blocks light from getting to earth".
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:53
2
2
$begingroup$
Well, you'd also need to make it an incredibly large object... And you should probably check to see if there are any posts here already on maintaining L1-L3 orbits
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
Jun 26 at 16:57
$begingroup$
Well, you'd also need to make it an incredibly large object... And you should probably check to see if there are any posts here already on maintaining L1-L3 orbits
$endgroup$
– Rory Alsop
Jun 26 at 16:57
$begingroup$
Will do, also I should clarify it doesn't have to cast a shadow entirely over earth. Its shadow just has to reach earth.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 17:00
$begingroup$
Will do, also I should clarify it doesn't have to cast a shadow entirely over earth. Its shadow just has to reach earth.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 17:00
5
5
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx L1 is located 1.5 million km away from Earth. The Moon is about 0.4 million km away, and is barely large enough to cast a shadow during eclipses. So, your object should be roughly 4 times larger than the Moon. Good luck with that.
$endgroup$
– IMil
Jun 27 at 0:59
$begingroup$
@Jeffyx L1 is located 1.5 million km away from Earth. The Moon is about 0.4 million km away, and is barely large enough to cast a shadow during eclipses. So, your object should be roughly 4 times larger than the Moon. Good luck with that.
$endgroup$
– IMil
Jun 27 at 0:59
$begingroup$
one problem with L2 is that you end up in the shadow of the earth
$endgroup$
– njzk2
Jun 27 at 6:17
$begingroup$
one problem with L2 is that you end up in the shadow of the earth
$endgroup$
– njzk2
Jun 27 at 6:17
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Note: the question has been radically re-written since this answer was written. Consequently, it is no longer relevant to the question.
If you want an object to stay between the Sun and Earth, it has to be at the Earth-Sun L1 point, which is about 1.5 million km away. We already have stuff there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_and_Heliospheric_Observatory
At L1, you can arrange for your object to cross the Sun from the perspective of any point on Earth. However, this is different than casting a shadow on Earth. In order to cast a shadow, you'll need your object to have at least the same angular size as the Sun, as seem from Earth. Conveniently, the Moon has approximately the same angular size as the Sun, and it's only 384,400 km away. In order to have to be able to eclipse the sun from L1, your object will need to be substantially larger than the Moon.
Now that we're talking about something enormous, the physics of Lagrange points comes into play. They're only stable(-ish) for objects of negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. SOHO has negligible mass compared to the Earth and the Sun. A sun-shade several times the diameter of the Moon probably doesn't. You could try making it a disc rather than a sphere (to keep its mass down), but I expect that tidal forces would spin it out of alignment quite quickly. Its mass will also noticeably affect Earth's orbit, changing the position of the Earth-Sun L1. You'll end up with a complicated gravitational dance as both Earth and your object try to share a similar orbit. Possible outcomes include:
- The object collides with Earth.
- The object collides with the Moon
- The Moon gets tugged into a much more elliptical orbit, resulting in far higher tides that make a giant mess on Earth.
- The Moon gets ejected from Earth orbit, possibly colliding with Earth.
- The object gets ejected into an elliptical orbit around the Sun, where it probably eventually collides with Earth, Venus, or Mars. Meanwhile, Earth ends up in a somewhat lower orbit and more elliptical orbit, throwing another big wrench into the climate.
- Some combination of the above catastrophes, which may involve the object being a temporary second moon for a while.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
L1 through L3 aren't stable even if the object does have negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. Only L4 and L5 (the equitriangular L-points) are stable locations long-term.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Jun 27 at 1:22
$begingroup$
@Sean: True. But for such a large object, the instabilities of L1 through L3 aren't going to come into play. The physics of Lagrange points simply doesn't apply at all.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 1:29
$begingroup$
I don't see a major problem with a hollow, spinning sphere. Spinning keeps it from collapsing under its own gravity, and being hollow makes it several orders of magnitude lighter than the moon.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Jun 27 at 8:25
$begingroup$
I had no idea how large something had to be to cast a true shadow, thank you for all the information!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:33
$begingroup$
@MSalters: Ok, that could work. It'll still be a huge mass for station-keeping in an unstable L1, but it's probably not heavy enough to significantly destabilize the Earth-Sun system and it has lots of surface area to gather energy.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 16:37
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note: the question has been radically re-written since this answer was written. Consequently, it is no longer relevant to the question.
If you want an object to stay between the Sun and Earth, it has to be at the Earth-Sun L1 point, which is about 1.5 million km away. We already have stuff there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_and_Heliospheric_Observatory
At L1, you can arrange for your object to cross the Sun from the perspective of any point on Earth. However, this is different than casting a shadow on Earth. In order to cast a shadow, you'll need your object to have at least the same angular size as the Sun, as seem from Earth. Conveniently, the Moon has approximately the same angular size as the Sun, and it's only 384,400 km away. In order to have to be able to eclipse the sun from L1, your object will need to be substantially larger than the Moon.
Now that we're talking about something enormous, the physics of Lagrange points comes into play. They're only stable(-ish) for objects of negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. SOHO has negligible mass compared to the Earth and the Sun. A sun-shade several times the diameter of the Moon probably doesn't. You could try making it a disc rather than a sphere (to keep its mass down), but I expect that tidal forces would spin it out of alignment quite quickly. Its mass will also noticeably affect Earth's orbit, changing the position of the Earth-Sun L1. You'll end up with a complicated gravitational dance as both Earth and your object try to share a similar orbit. Possible outcomes include:
- The object collides with Earth.
- The object collides with the Moon
- The Moon gets tugged into a much more elliptical orbit, resulting in far higher tides that make a giant mess on Earth.
- The Moon gets ejected from Earth orbit, possibly colliding with Earth.
- The object gets ejected into an elliptical orbit around the Sun, where it probably eventually collides with Earth, Venus, or Mars. Meanwhile, Earth ends up in a somewhat lower orbit and more elliptical orbit, throwing another big wrench into the climate.
- Some combination of the above catastrophes, which may involve the object being a temporary second moon for a while.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
L1 through L3 aren't stable even if the object does have negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. Only L4 and L5 (the equitriangular L-points) are stable locations long-term.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Jun 27 at 1:22
$begingroup$
@Sean: True. But for such a large object, the instabilities of L1 through L3 aren't going to come into play. The physics of Lagrange points simply doesn't apply at all.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 1:29
$begingroup$
I don't see a major problem with a hollow, spinning sphere. Spinning keeps it from collapsing under its own gravity, and being hollow makes it several orders of magnitude lighter than the moon.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Jun 27 at 8:25
$begingroup$
I had no idea how large something had to be to cast a true shadow, thank you for all the information!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:33
$begingroup$
@MSalters: Ok, that could work. It'll still be a huge mass for station-keeping in an unstable L1, but it's probably not heavy enough to significantly destabilize the Earth-Sun system and it has lots of surface area to gather energy.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 16:37
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note: the question has been radically re-written since this answer was written. Consequently, it is no longer relevant to the question.
If you want an object to stay between the Sun and Earth, it has to be at the Earth-Sun L1 point, which is about 1.5 million km away. We already have stuff there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_and_Heliospheric_Observatory
At L1, you can arrange for your object to cross the Sun from the perspective of any point on Earth. However, this is different than casting a shadow on Earth. In order to cast a shadow, you'll need your object to have at least the same angular size as the Sun, as seem from Earth. Conveniently, the Moon has approximately the same angular size as the Sun, and it's only 384,400 km away. In order to have to be able to eclipse the sun from L1, your object will need to be substantially larger than the Moon.
Now that we're talking about something enormous, the physics of Lagrange points comes into play. They're only stable(-ish) for objects of negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. SOHO has negligible mass compared to the Earth and the Sun. A sun-shade several times the diameter of the Moon probably doesn't. You could try making it a disc rather than a sphere (to keep its mass down), but I expect that tidal forces would spin it out of alignment quite quickly. Its mass will also noticeably affect Earth's orbit, changing the position of the Earth-Sun L1. You'll end up with a complicated gravitational dance as both Earth and your object try to share a similar orbit. Possible outcomes include:
- The object collides with Earth.
- The object collides with the Moon
- The Moon gets tugged into a much more elliptical orbit, resulting in far higher tides that make a giant mess on Earth.
- The Moon gets ejected from Earth orbit, possibly colliding with Earth.
- The object gets ejected into an elliptical orbit around the Sun, where it probably eventually collides with Earth, Venus, or Mars. Meanwhile, Earth ends up in a somewhat lower orbit and more elliptical orbit, throwing another big wrench into the climate.
- Some combination of the above catastrophes, which may involve the object being a temporary second moon for a while.
$endgroup$
Note: the question has been radically re-written since this answer was written. Consequently, it is no longer relevant to the question.
If you want an object to stay between the Sun and Earth, it has to be at the Earth-Sun L1 point, which is about 1.5 million km away. We already have stuff there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_and_Heliospheric_Observatory
At L1, you can arrange for your object to cross the Sun from the perspective of any point on Earth. However, this is different than casting a shadow on Earth. In order to cast a shadow, you'll need your object to have at least the same angular size as the Sun, as seem from Earth. Conveniently, the Moon has approximately the same angular size as the Sun, and it's only 384,400 km away. In order to have to be able to eclipse the sun from L1, your object will need to be substantially larger than the Moon.
Now that we're talking about something enormous, the physics of Lagrange points comes into play. They're only stable(-ish) for objects of negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. SOHO has negligible mass compared to the Earth and the Sun. A sun-shade several times the diameter of the Moon probably doesn't. You could try making it a disc rather than a sphere (to keep its mass down), but I expect that tidal forces would spin it out of alignment quite quickly. Its mass will also noticeably affect Earth's orbit, changing the position of the Earth-Sun L1. You'll end up with a complicated gravitational dance as both Earth and your object try to share a similar orbit. Possible outcomes include:
- The object collides with Earth.
- The object collides with the Moon
- The Moon gets tugged into a much more elliptical orbit, resulting in far higher tides that make a giant mess on Earth.
- The Moon gets ejected from Earth orbit, possibly colliding with Earth.
- The object gets ejected into an elliptical orbit around the Sun, where it probably eventually collides with Earth, Venus, or Mars. Meanwhile, Earth ends up in a somewhat lower orbit and more elliptical orbit, throwing another big wrench into the climate.
- Some combination of the above catastrophes, which may involve the object being a temporary second moon for a while.
edited Jun 27 at 19:15
answered Jun 27 at 0:58
user3553031user3553031
1513 bronze badges
1513 bronze badges
$begingroup$
L1 through L3 aren't stable even if the object does have negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. Only L4 and L5 (the equitriangular L-points) are stable locations long-term.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Jun 27 at 1:22
$begingroup$
@Sean: True. But for such a large object, the instabilities of L1 through L3 aren't going to come into play. The physics of Lagrange points simply doesn't apply at all.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 1:29
$begingroup$
I don't see a major problem with a hollow, spinning sphere. Spinning keeps it from collapsing under its own gravity, and being hollow makes it several orders of magnitude lighter than the moon.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Jun 27 at 8:25
$begingroup$
I had no idea how large something had to be to cast a true shadow, thank you for all the information!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:33
$begingroup$
@MSalters: Ok, that could work. It'll still be a huge mass for station-keeping in an unstable L1, but it's probably not heavy enough to significantly destabilize the Earth-Sun system and it has lots of surface area to gather energy.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 16:37
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
L1 through L3 aren't stable even if the object does have negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. Only L4 and L5 (the equitriangular L-points) are stable locations long-term.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Jun 27 at 1:22
$begingroup$
@Sean: True. But for such a large object, the instabilities of L1 through L3 aren't going to come into play. The physics of Lagrange points simply doesn't apply at all.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 1:29
$begingroup$
I don't see a major problem with a hollow, spinning sphere. Spinning keeps it from collapsing under its own gravity, and being hollow makes it several orders of magnitude lighter than the moon.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Jun 27 at 8:25
$begingroup$
I had no idea how large something had to be to cast a true shadow, thank you for all the information!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:33
$begingroup$
@MSalters: Ok, that could work. It'll still be a huge mass for station-keeping in an unstable L1, but it's probably not heavy enough to significantly destabilize the Earth-Sun system and it has lots of surface area to gather energy.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 16:37
$begingroup$
L1 through L3 aren't stable even if the object does have negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. Only L4 and L5 (the equitriangular L-points) are stable locations long-term.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Jun 27 at 1:22
$begingroup$
L1 through L3 aren't stable even if the object does have negligible mass compared to the primary and secondary. Only L4 and L5 (the equitriangular L-points) are stable locations long-term.
$endgroup$
– Sean
Jun 27 at 1:22
$begingroup$
@Sean: True. But for such a large object, the instabilities of L1 through L3 aren't going to come into play. The physics of Lagrange points simply doesn't apply at all.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 1:29
$begingroup$
@Sean: True. But for such a large object, the instabilities of L1 through L3 aren't going to come into play. The physics of Lagrange points simply doesn't apply at all.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 1:29
$begingroup$
I don't see a major problem with a hollow, spinning sphere. Spinning keeps it from collapsing under its own gravity, and being hollow makes it several orders of magnitude lighter than the moon.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Jun 27 at 8:25
$begingroup$
I don't see a major problem with a hollow, spinning sphere. Spinning keeps it from collapsing under its own gravity, and being hollow makes it several orders of magnitude lighter than the moon.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
Jun 27 at 8:25
$begingroup$
I had no idea how large something had to be to cast a true shadow, thank you for all the information!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:33
$begingroup$
I had no idea how large something had to be to cast a true shadow, thank you for all the information!
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 27 at 12:33
$begingroup$
@MSalters: Ok, that could work. It'll still be a huge mass for station-keeping in an unstable L1, but it's probably not heavy enough to significantly destabilize the Earth-Sun system and it has lots of surface area to gather energy.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 16:37
$begingroup$
@MSalters: Ok, that could work. It'll still be a huge mass for station-keeping in an unstable L1, but it's probably not heavy enough to significantly destabilize the Earth-Sun system and it has lots of surface area to gather energy.
$endgroup$
– user3553031
Jun 27 at 16:37
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You're on the right track looking up Lagrangian points, orbits where a small object can stay in the same relationship with two celestial bodies, one orbiting another. The one you are describing is the earth-sun L2 point, a point outside of earth's orbit around the sun. This Wikipedia page will tell you more.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, this was helpful for me figuring out my correct question.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:59
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You're on the right track looking up Lagrangian points, orbits where a small object can stay in the same relationship with two celestial bodies, one orbiting another. The one you are describing is the earth-sun L2 point, a point outside of earth's orbit around the sun. This Wikipedia page will tell you more.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, this was helpful for me figuring out my correct question.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:59
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You're on the right track looking up Lagrangian points, orbits where a small object can stay in the same relationship with two celestial bodies, one orbiting another. The one you are describing is the earth-sun L2 point, a point outside of earth's orbit around the sun. This Wikipedia page will tell you more.
$endgroup$
You're on the right track looking up Lagrangian points, orbits where a small object can stay in the same relationship with two celestial bodies, one orbiting another. The one you are describing is the earth-sun L2 point, a point outside of earth's orbit around the sun. This Wikipedia page will tell you more.
answered Jun 26 at 16:46
antlersoftantlersoft
1314 bronze badges
1314 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thanks, this was helpful for me figuring out my correct question.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:59
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Thanks, this was helpful for me figuring out my correct question.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Thanks, this was helpful for me figuring out my correct question.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Thanks, this was helpful for me figuring out my correct question.
$endgroup$
– Jeffyx
Jun 26 at 16:59
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
With engines!
Orbiting at L1 is completely feasible, as long as your satellite regularly uses little bursts from its engines to keep it there. L1 is "unstable", meaning that a satellite without engines will eventually drift away from L1. But the closer your satellite stays to L1, the less fuel it requires to stay in place. Low thrust, high specific impulse engines such as ion thrusters are often used to keep satellites in the right orbit.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
With engines!
Orbiting at L1 is completely feasible, as long as your satellite regularly uses little bursts from its engines to keep it there. L1 is "unstable", meaning that a satellite without engines will eventually drift away from L1. But the closer your satellite stays to L1, the less fuel it requires to stay in place. Low thrust, high specific impulse engines such as ion thrusters are often used to keep satellites in the right orbit.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
With engines!
Orbiting at L1 is completely feasible, as long as your satellite regularly uses little bursts from its engines to keep it there. L1 is "unstable", meaning that a satellite without engines will eventually drift away from L1. But the closer your satellite stays to L1, the less fuel it requires to stay in place. Low thrust, high specific impulse engines such as ion thrusters are often used to keep satellites in the right orbit.
$endgroup$
With engines!
Orbiting at L1 is completely feasible, as long as your satellite regularly uses little bursts from its engines to keep it there. L1 is "unstable", meaning that a satellite without engines will eventually drift away from L1. But the closer your satellite stays to L1, the less fuel it requires to stay in place. Low thrust, high specific impulse engines such as ion thrusters are often used to keep satellites in the right orbit.
answered Jun 27 at 1:04
RobynRobyn
1113 bronze badges
1113 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36969%2fhow-could-a-satellite-follow-earth-around-the-sun-while-staying-outside-of-earth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
related but different question: Is a sun-blocking orbit possible?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jun 27 at 0:10
1
$begingroup$
Do you need a completely black shadow to reach earth? Or do you just want to reduce the energy reaching the earth?
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
Jun 27 at 2:30
$begingroup$
I rolled back your previous edit because it changes the scope of the question and invalidates the answers which were already posted. If you have a followup question, please accept the answer you got and post your followup question as a new question.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jun 27 at 11:42