How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?Why did Apollo 11 need someone to stay behind in lunar orbit?How did Gemini/ Agena rendezvous?Could the Apollo lunar ascent stage have separated from the descent stage before touchdown in an emergency?What was the purpose of an Apollo 10 test?Could the Apollo LM abort mode be engaged after touchdown? What would have happened if it was?How important is plume impingement in rendezvous operations?How long is the Apollo Lunar Module extraction window?Launch window for the Apollo Lunar Module?In this iconic lunar orbit rendezvous photo of John Houbolt, why do arrows #5 and #6 point the “wrong” way?

Conveying the idea of "tricky"

Use GPLv3 library in a closed system (no software distribution)

Is success due to hard work sustainable in academic research?

What is gerrymandering called if it's not the result of redrawing districts?

Repair drywall and protect wires on back of electrical panel

If equal temperament divides octave into 12 equal parts, why hertz differences are not the same but element 12th of two?

Is there an unambiguous name for the social/political theory "liberalism" without "leftist"?

Can US Congress members be (successfully) sued for defamation?

Teaching asymptotic notations at the beginning of Calculus

How to write Gaussian reduction?

What exactly is meant by "partial function" in functional programming?

The use of SlotSequence in If[#1 > #2, ##] &

Why are there never-ending wars in the Middle East?

For piano scales, should I let go of the previous key before I hit the next one?

How can a stock trade for a fraction of a cent?

RAM stress test

What are the advantages to banks being located in the City of London (the Square Mile)?

"If you can breath, you can stand. If you can stand, you can fight."

Remove x last elements of an array and reinsert them before position y

What's the safest shape for homemade hard-candy

Options for passes to national parks in Arizona/Utah for 5 people travelling in one car

Replacing each letter with the letter that is in the corresponding position from the end of the English alphabet

Will my familiar remember me when I re-summon it, or is it a new entity?

Are there any Baryons that have quark-antiquark combinations?



How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?


Why did Apollo 11 need someone to stay behind in lunar orbit?How did Gemini/ Agena rendezvous?Could the Apollo lunar ascent stage have separated from the descent stage before touchdown in an emergency?What was the purpose of an Apollo 10 test?Could the Apollo LM abort mode be engaged after touchdown? What would have happened if it was?How important is plume impingement in rendezvous operations?How long is the Apollo Lunar Module extraction window?Launch window for the Apollo Lunar Module?In this iconic lunar orbit rendezvous photo of John Houbolt, why do arrows #5 and #6 point the “wrong” way?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








10














$begingroup$


If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18

















10














$begingroup$


If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18













10












10








10





$begingroup$


If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$




If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?







apollo-program abort rendezvous






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 29 at 0:20









DrSheldon

16.7k6 gold badges65 silver badges131 bronze badges




16.7k6 gold badges65 silver badges131 bronze badges










asked May 28 at 12:56









Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman

511 silver badge3 bronze badges




511 silver badge3 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:11










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    May 29 at 0:18







1




1




$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11




$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11












$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18




$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















19
















$begingroup$

Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
    $endgroup$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 29 at 13:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Jour
    May 30 at 0:52


















16
















$begingroup$

There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



enter image description here



It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$
















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36443%2fhow-was-apollo-supposed-to-rendezvous-in-the-case-of-a-lunar-abort%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    19
















    $begingroup$

    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52















    19
















    $begingroup$

    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52













    19














    19










    19







    $begingroup$

    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$



    Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.



    The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited May 28 at 13:43

























    answered May 28 at 13:28









    GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger

    4,5147 silver badges25 bronze badges




    4,5147 silver badges25 bronze badges










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
      $endgroup$
      – Russell McMahon
      May 29 at 13:54






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      May 30 at 0:52







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
    $endgroup$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 29 at 13:54




    $begingroup$
    "East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
    $endgroup$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 29 at 13:54




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Jour
    May 30 at 0:52




    $begingroup$
    Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Jour
    May 30 at 0:52













    16
















    $begingroup$

    There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



    enter image description here



    It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



    So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$



















      16
















      $begingroup$

      There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



      enter image description here



      It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



      So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$

















        16














        16










        16







        $begingroup$

        There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



        enter image description here



        It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



        So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.






        share|improve this answer










        $endgroup$



        There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:



        enter image description here



        It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.



        So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered May 28 at 16:43









        indy91indy91

        1,0566 silver badges8 bronze badges




        1,0566 silver badges8 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36443%2fhow-was-apollo-supposed-to-rendezvous-in-the-case-of-a-lunar-abort%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

            How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

            Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü