Thesis' “Future Work” section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?Include background to ideas for future work in related work chapter of master thesis?Which is better for PhD application: research-based BS thesis somewhat related to interests, or extra courses + standard thesis in area of interest?PhD Dissertation Introduction: What to call section on thesis structure/overview?Can my undergraduate research thesis be published in a scientific paper? If so, how should I go?How to continue doing researchInconsistent advice on PhD wordcountDoes it look bad to have a PhD thesis unrelated to the rest of future research?A PhD student is using all the work I did for my master and presenting it as his own for his dissertation

Can I use the DEC VT220 composite output to connect it to a TV?

Is it safe to pay bills over satellite internet?

What fantasy book has twins (except one's blue) and a cloaked ice bear on the cover?

Does a restocking fee still qualify as a business expense?

Why is Trump releasing or not of his taxes such a big deal?

Is aerodynamics study compulsory for building a plane?

Can we not simply connect a battery to a RAM to prevent data loss during power cuts?

the vs. value: what is the difference

Does my protagonist need to be the most important character?

Which culture used no personal names?

Code Golf Measurer © 2019

Why is technology bad for children?

What could possibly power an Alcubierre drive?

Mapping string into integers

Symbolise polygon outline where it doesn't coincide with other feature using geometry generator in QGIS?

Meaning of 'pound' in "felt a fury that was not his own pound through his body"

Can you use a virtual credit card to withdraw money from an ATM in the UK?

If we should encrypt the message rather than the method of transfer, why do we care about wifi security? Is this just security theatre?

Accidental duration in measureless music

Encountering former, abusive advisor at a conference

How safe is the 4% rule if the U.S. goes back to the mean?

How are Aircraft Noses Designed?

"A tin of biscuits" vs "A biscuit tin"

Justify of equation to better explanation



Thesis' “Future Work” section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?


Include background to ideas for future work in related work chapter of master thesis?Which is better for PhD application: research-based BS thesis somewhat related to interests, or extra courses + standard thesis in area of interest?PhD Dissertation Introduction: What to call section on thesis structure/overview?Can my undergraduate research thesis be published in a scientific paper? If so, how should I go?How to continue doing researchInconsistent advice on PhD wordcountDoes it look bad to have a PhD thesis unrelated to the rest of future research?A PhD student is using all the work I did for my master and presenting it as his own for his dissertation






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









16

















So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question























  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03

















16

















So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question























  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03













16












16








16


2






So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question
















So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?







thesis






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited May 9 at 20:51









Søren D. Ptæus

1052 bronze badges




1052 bronze badges










asked May 8 at 12:33









Jim AlisonJim Alison

871 silver badge3 bronze badges




871 silver badge3 bronze badges










  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03












  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03







19




19





Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

– Buffy
May 8 at 13:00





Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

– Buffy
May 8 at 13:00




16




16





Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

– Soltius
May 8 at 13:39





Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

– Soltius
May 8 at 13:39




3




3





I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

– TEK
May 8 at 19:09





I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

– TEK
May 8 at 19:09













"I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

– smci
May 9 at 13:20






"I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

– smci
May 9 at 13:20





2




2





I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

– Mike
May 9 at 17:03





I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

– Mike
May 9 at 17:03










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















70



















Am I overthinking this?




Yes.




my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






share|improve this answer



































    30


















    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






    share|improve this answer

































      12


















      You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



      If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






      share|improve this answer


























      • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

        – Jim Alison
        May 8 at 12:51






      • 5





        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

        – Johanna
        May 8 at 12:53


















      7


















      You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
      So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






      share|improve this answer



























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "415"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );














        draft saved

        draft discarded
















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130273%2fthesis-future-work-section-is-it-acceptable-to-omit-personal-involvement-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown


























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        70



















        Am I overthinking this?




        Yes.




        my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




        Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




        I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




        A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



        It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




        we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




        You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






        share|improve this answer
































          70



















          Am I overthinking this?




          Yes.




          my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




          Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




          I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




          A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



          It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




          we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




          You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






          share|improve this answer






























            70














            70










            70










            Am I overthinking this?




            Yes.




            my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




            Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




            I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




            A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



            It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




            we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




            You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






            share|improve this answer

















            Am I overthinking this?




            Yes.




            my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




            Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




            I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




            A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



            It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




            we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




            You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.







            share|improve this answer















            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 8 at 15:36

























            answered May 8 at 12:41









            user2768user2768

            21k4 gold badges55 silver badges79 bronze badges




            21k4 gold badges55 silver badges79 bronze badges


























                30


















                The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                share|improve this answer






























                  30


















                  The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    30














                    30










                    30









                    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                    share|improve this answer














                    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.







                    share|improve this answer













                    share|improve this answer




                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered May 8 at 12:43









                    cheersmatecheersmate

                    1,0211 gold badge4 silver badges18 bronze badges




                    1,0211 gold badge4 silver badges18 bronze badges
























                        12


















                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer


























                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53















                        12


















                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer


























                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53













                        12














                        12










                        12









                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer














                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.







                        share|improve this answer













                        share|improve this answer




                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered May 8 at 12:41









                        JohannaJohanna

                        7,9032 gold badges26 silver badges38 bronze badges




                        7,9032 gold badges26 silver badges38 bronze badges















                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53

















                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53
















                        Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                        – Jim Alison
                        May 8 at 12:51





                        Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                        – Jim Alison
                        May 8 at 12:51




                        5




                        5





                        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                        – Johanna
                        May 8 at 12:53





                        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                        – Johanna
                        May 8 at 12:53











                        7


















                        You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                        So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                        share|improve this answer






























                          7


















                          You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                          So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                          share|improve this answer




























                            7














                            7










                            7









                            You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                            So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                            share|improve this answer














                            You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                            So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.







                            share|improve this answer













                            share|improve this answer




                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered May 8 at 15:39









                            FooBarFooBar

                            2007 bronze badges




                            2007 bronze badges































                                draft saved

                                draft discarded















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130273%2fthesis-future-work-section-is-it-acceptable-to-omit-personal-involvement-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown









                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                                Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                                Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?