Did Dr. Hannibal Lecter like Clarice or was he attracted to her?What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?Why did Jodie Foster decide not to reprise the role of Clarice in Hannibal?Why were there only 2 guards for Hannibal Lecter on the 6th floor?Would Dr Hannibal Lecter allow himself to be a consultant with Clarice if Miggs hadn't behaved improperly to her?What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?Why did the FBI want to extract information about Buffalo Bill from Hannibal Lecter?Hannibal movies' lack of informationWhy does Dr. Hannibal Lecter respect Clarice in “Silence of the Lambs”?Why was Hannibal Lecter imprisoned in what appears to be a museum?Why was a FBI Academy recruit sent to question Hannibal Lecter?Why does Hannibal Lecter look away when talking to Clarice about her father's death and her childhood but looks her in the eye otherwise?
Why would prey creatures not hate predator creatures?
Is the sentence "pay some in cash" understandable?
Do monthly payments decrease on a mortgage later in the loan?
What is :>filename.txt Doing?
Ethics: Is it ethical for a professor to conduct research using a student's ideas without giving them credit?
Difference/relationship between power and significance
What events still occur within a transaction that gets rolled back?
Are we sinners because we sin or do we sin because we are sinners?
When to use Sitecore.Context.Items and why?
What happened to Eladrin? Did something make them unavailable to play?
I think one of my players wants to leave the campaign
What should I tell a customer when my co-worker fails to show up to a meeting?
How do critical hits work with static monster damage?
Days in indexed month
Does a resurrected wizard remember their prepared spells?
Why are the rain clouds darker?
What is White's motivation to give up the Queen?
Arabia and the Middle Ages
Why has no one requested the tape of the Trump/Ukraine call?
Why does rapeseed oil turn sticky but coconut oil doesn't?
Guide mode ATC with locker to belay loop
What's the question to this and what is its answer?
Formula for sum of combinations
Raised concerns about a security vulnerability to various managers, for more than a year, with no results. Should I mention it to external auditors?
Did Dr. Hannibal Lecter like Clarice or was he attracted to her?
What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?Why did Jodie Foster decide not to reprise the role of Clarice in Hannibal?Why were there only 2 guards for Hannibal Lecter on the 6th floor?Would Dr Hannibal Lecter allow himself to be a consultant with Clarice if Miggs hadn't behaved improperly to her?What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?Why did the FBI want to extract information about Buffalo Bill from Hannibal Lecter?Hannibal movies' lack of informationWhy does Dr. Hannibal Lecter respect Clarice in “Silence of the Lambs”?Why was Hannibal Lecter imprisoned in what appears to be a museum?Why was a FBI Academy recruit sent to question Hannibal Lecter?Why does Hannibal Lecter look away when talking to Clarice about her father's death and her childhood but looks her in the eye otherwise?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
In The Silence of the Lambs Dr. Hannibal Lecter had drawn a picture of Clarice in prison.
The picture is seen here:
Drawing a picture of her indicates that he was thinking more about her.
Again, he was trying to touch her hand while giving one file to her. The following picture indicates this:
Was it true that Dr. Hannibal Lecter liked her or was attracted to her?
It has been shown in the movie that Dr. Lecter was taking care of her. The following incidences indicate this:
Lecter had given her a towel to dry her hair.
He had asked after the wound on her leg.
In the end, Lecter asked Clarice whether or not her nightmares had stopped.
From her life story, Dr. Hannibal Lecter learned that Clarice has been a very sensitive and kind person since her childhood. She is innocent (a dialogue with Lecter indicates this). She is not rude like others he used to see around. Was Lecter attracted towards her due to her nature?
character the-silence-of-the-lambs
add a comment
|
In The Silence of the Lambs Dr. Hannibal Lecter had drawn a picture of Clarice in prison.
The picture is seen here:
Drawing a picture of her indicates that he was thinking more about her.
Again, he was trying to touch her hand while giving one file to her. The following picture indicates this:
Was it true that Dr. Hannibal Lecter liked her or was attracted to her?
It has been shown in the movie that Dr. Lecter was taking care of her. The following incidences indicate this:
Lecter had given her a towel to dry her hair.
He had asked after the wound on her leg.
In the end, Lecter asked Clarice whether or not her nightmares had stopped.
From her life story, Dr. Hannibal Lecter learned that Clarice has been a very sensitive and kind person since her childhood. She is innocent (a dialogue with Lecter indicates this). She is not rude like others he used to see around. Was Lecter attracted towards her due to her nature?
character the-silence-of-the-lambs
1
I think he was curious about her.
– Vishwa
Aug 26 at 9:27
Related question from the sequel: What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?
– Ankit Sharma
Aug 26 at 9:28
Like in a way that farmers look after their cattle?
– IlludiumPu36
Aug 27 at 7:56
add a comment
|
In The Silence of the Lambs Dr. Hannibal Lecter had drawn a picture of Clarice in prison.
The picture is seen here:
Drawing a picture of her indicates that he was thinking more about her.
Again, he was trying to touch her hand while giving one file to her. The following picture indicates this:
Was it true that Dr. Hannibal Lecter liked her or was attracted to her?
It has been shown in the movie that Dr. Lecter was taking care of her. The following incidences indicate this:
Lecter had given her a towel to dry her hair.
He had asked after the wound on her leg.
In the end, Lecter asked Clarice whether or not her nightmares had stopped.
From her life story, Dr. Hannibal Lecter learned that Clarice has been a very sensitive and kind person since her childhood. She is innocent (a dialogue with Lecter indicates this). She is not rude like others he used to see around. Was Lecter attracted towards her due to her nature?
character the-silence-of-the-lambs
In The Silence of the Lambs Dr. Hannibal Lecter had drawn a picture of Clarice in prison.
The picture is seen here:
Drawing a picture of her indicates that he was thinking more about her.
Again, he was trying to touch her hand while giving one file to her. The following picture indicates this:
Was it true that Dr. Hannibal Lecter liked her or was attracted to her?
It has been shown in the movie that Dr. Lecter was taking care of her. The following incidences indicate this:
Lecter had given her a towel to dry her hair.
He had asked after the wound on her leg.
In the end, Lecter asked Clarice whether or not her nightmares had stopped.
From her life story, Dr. Hannibal Lecter learned that Clarice has been a very sensitive and kind person since her childhood. She is innocent (a dialogue with Lecter indicates this). She is not rude like others he used to see around. Was Lecter attracted towards her due to her nature?
character the-silence-of-the-lambs
character the-silence-of-the-lambs
edited Aug 28 at 5:19
Shree
asked Aug 26 at 8:55
ShreeShree
7305 silver badges19 bronze badges
7305 silver badges19 bronze badges
1
I think he was curious about her.
– Vishwa
Aug 26 at 9:27
Related question from the sequel: What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?
– Ankit Sharma
Aug 26 at 9:28
Like in a way that farmers look after their cattle?
– IlludiumPu36
Aug 27 at 7:56
add a comment
|
1
I think he was curious about her.
– Vishwa
Aug 26 at 9:27
Related question from the sequel: What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?
– Ankit Sharma
Aug 26 at 9:28
Like in a way that farmers look after their cattle?
– IlludiumPu36
Aug 27 at 7:56
1
1
I think he was curious about her.
– Vishwa
Aug 26 at 9:27
I think he was curious about her.
– Vishwa
Aug 26 at 9:27
Related question from the sequel: What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?
– Ankit Sharma
Aug 26 at 9:28
Related question from the sequel: What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?
– Ankit Sharma
Aug 26 at 9:28
Like in a way that farmers look after their cattle?
– IlludiumPu36
Aug 27 at 7:56
Like in a way that farmers look after their cattle?
– IlludiumPu36
Aug 27 at 7:56
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, Hannibal Lecter sees a lot of things in Clarice:
- Someone who is smart, but not rude. (Rudeness is Hannibal's biggest pet peeve).
- Someone who has suffered in a way that he has suffered (childhood trauma, losing family),
- And eventually, someone who may be able to house his dead little sister's conscience.
- And someone to love, who can also heal his childhood trauma.
In Silence of the Lambs (book and film), it isn't perfectly clear what it is exactly that draws Hannibal to Clarice and even if he is particularly drawn to her or just screwing with her head. But the religious depictions and time dedicated to her become much clearer in the next two novels Hannibal (which takes place seven years after SOTL) and Hannibal Rising (a prequel origin and revenge story set during Lecter's childhood and late teenage years).
The Books (original source material):
In these novels, it becomes clearer that Lecter and Clarice both suffered some traumatic childhood experiences that involved losing someone they loved. For Clarice, it's her father. For Hannibal, it's his little sister.
The Hannibal novel, however, has a lot going on that isn't really explained. Hannibal somehow comes to believe in necromancy; that Clarice is a perfect vessel for his little sister's (Mischa's) consciousness.
And so I came to believe, " Dr. Lecter was saying, "that there had to
be a place in the world for Mischa, a prime place vacated for her, and
I came to think, Clarice, that the best place in the world was yours."
-Hannibal pg 535
Lecter goes through great pains to try and psychologically drive Clarice to bend her to his will, but ultimately comes to realize he has no control over what he created and Clarice declares that the best space for Mischa would be his own.
"It occurred to Dr. Lecter in that moment that with all of his
knowledge and intrusion, he could never entirely predict her, or own
her at all. He could feed the caterpillar, he could whisper through
the chrysalis; what hatched out followed its own nature and was
beyond him." - Hannibal (about Clarice) Pg523
Normally, one might assume that Hannibal wouldn't accept this, but oddly Hannibal does (because he's in love), and the two go off to Buenos Aires together. From Clarice's perspective, despite the manipulation, there may be subtext from Thomas Harris about Clarice transforming into a woman, as there are some erotic lines about nurturing Lecter from her breasts.
In the film version, Lecter also puts Clarice in a rather expensive designer dress, as he helps Clarice with her misogynistic nemesis at the FBI, Paul Krendler. These details are important, as Clarice is thought of as homely and without taste (and taste is something Hannibal cares about greatly), which could play back to how Lecter remembers his toddler sister, being sort of imperfect and messy.
At any rate, the final lines of the Hannibal novel are very suggestive that Clarice is where she wants to be and Lecter is now beginning to heal from his past, because of this romantic relationship...
"Occasionally, on purpose, Dr. Lecter drops a teacup to shatter on the
floor. He is satisfied when it does not gather itself together. For
many months now, he has not seen Mischa in his dreams.
Someday perhaps the cup will come together. Or somewhere Starling may
hear a crossbow string and come to some unwilled awakening, if she
indeed even sleeps. We'll withdraw now, while they're dancing on the
terrace--..." -Hannibal pg 544
Hannibal Film Adaptation/Novel Comparison:
However, the film version of Hannibal takes things in a slightly different direction, as all knowledge of Mischa is omitted from the film and Clarice Starling is not psychologically manipulated into the person she becomes at the end of the novel. In fact the film's ending is dramtically different for this reason.
But as Directer Ridley Scott has stated, the film (like novel) features themes of romance, punishment, and retribution and where a conversation Lecter as with Allegra, is a reference to how Hannibal feels about Clarice Starling
Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running through the
film. He told CNN that: "Hannibal was quite a different target,
essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather
romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad
behaviour as well." During the opera scene in Florence, Lecter
attends an operatic adaptation of one of Dante's sonnets, and meets
with Detective Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you
believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single
encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could ... but would she
see through the bars of his plight and ache for him?" This scene, in
the film, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning
of. It was in reference to Starling—to their encounter in The Silence
of the Lambs.[19] The New York Times, in its review of the film, said
Hannibal, "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name"
In addition both versions feature a scene of Mason Verger setting a trap for Hannibal by capturing Clarice, as Verger figures out from listening to Hannibal Lecter's recorded tapes from his time in the insititution, that he does seem to care greatly for Starling. So he has Starling kidnapped to use as bate! (See Picture Above)
But even outside of what both the film and book kept the same, the film still retains a great deal of subtext back to the novel, including that in the film adaptation's final acts, Hannibal still demonstrates his love for Clarice. (And maybe even more so than the book's)
"Tell me Clarice, would you ever say me, Stop. If you love me, you'd
stop."
Hannibal leans into kiss Clarice, but she handcuffs him, as the FBI are on there way to their location. Hannibal finds a butchers knife and tells Clarice, "This is REALLY going to hurt." Hannibal cuts off his own hand and escapes!
As for Clarice's potential affection for Hannibal Lecter, the film remains somewhat ambiguous about it. She never does anything blatant to show she cares, and she even denies having feelings (although you can read that in more than one way), but generally she keeps to a very moral center of what she believes her duty is, which goes back to novels' passages about her father, a police officer that was killed on duty.
The final scene of the film also shows Hannibal feeding some leftover remnant's of Paul Krendler's brains to young boy. As disturbing as the scene is, it calls back Hannibal's feelings towards the innocent and his own childhood.
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– Darth Locke
Aug 26 at 13:48
1
I would downvote this 'answer' more than once if I could. Silence of the lambs is from 1991, it's based on Thomas Harris's 1988 book. Picking quotes from 1999 and 2006 books as arguments make up 90% of this post. That is a blatant logical fallacy.
– user20086
Aug 27 at 11:10
2
It's the only way to answer the question, because even if there are three versions of canon, the source material is most reliable in explaining scenes within SOTL's adaptation, as the story of Hannibal Lecter (and Clarice Starling) is ongoing in both the order of books and films. I also only picked quotes from Hannibal. Hannibal Rising only "shows" the connection and gives us an explanation for what happened to Mischa (and Hannibal) as introduced in Hannibal novel, from Hannibal to Clarice.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:05
I've added more from the Hannibal film adaptation as well. Just so people have some information coming from both versions.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:49
2
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Who could forgive that? It's an underrated classic! ;-)
– Napoleon Wilson♦
Aug 27 at 18:04
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, Hannibal Lecter sees a lot of things in Clarice:
- Someone who is smart, but not rude. (Rudeness is Hannibal's biggest pet peeve).
- Someone who has suffered in a way that he has suffered (childhood trauma, losing family),
- And eventually, someone who may be able to house his dead little sister's conscience.
- And someone to love, who can also heal his childhood trauma.
In Silence of the Lambs (book and film), it isn't perfectly clear what it is exactly that draws Hannibal to Clarice and even if he is particularly drawn to her or just screwing with her head. But the religious depictions and time dedicated to her become much clearer in the next two novels Hannibal (which takes place seven years after SOTL) and Hannibal Rising (a prequel origin and revenge story set during Lecter's childhood and late teenage years).
The Books (original source material):
In these novels, it becomes clearer that Lecter and Clarice both suffered some traumatic childhood experiences that involved losing someone they loved. For Clarice, it's her father. For Hannibal, it's his little sister.
The Hannibal novel, however, has a lot going on that isn't really explained. Hannibal somehow comes to believe in necromancy; that Clarice is a perfect vessel for his little sister's (Mischa's) consciousness.
And so I came to believe, " Dr. Lecter was saying, "that there had to
be a place in the world for Mischa, a prime place vacated for her, and
I came to think, Clarice, that the best place in the world was yours."
-Hannibal pg 535
Lecter goes through great pains to try and psychologically drive Clarice to bend her to his will, but ultimately comes to realize he has no control over what he created and Clarice declares that the best space for Mischa would be his own.
"It occurred to Dr. Lecter in that moment that with all of his
knowledge and intrusion, he could never entirely predict her, or own
her at all. He could feed the caterpillar, he could whisper through
the chrysalis; what hatched out followed its own nature and was
beyond him." - Hannibal (about Clarice) Pg523
Normally, one might assume that Hannibal wouldn't accept this, but oddly Hannibal does (because he's in love), and the two go off to Buenos Aires together. From Clarice's perspective, despite the manipulation, there may be subtext from Thomas Harris about Clarice transforming into a woman, as there are some erotic lines about nurturing Lecter from her breasts.
In the film version, Lecter also puts Clarice in a rather expensive designer dress, as he helps Clarice with her misogynistic nemesis at the FBI, Paul Krendler. These details are important, as Clarice is thought of as homely and without taste (and taste is something Hannibal cares about greatly), which could play back to how Lecter remembers his toddler sister, being sort of imperfect and messy.
At any rate, the final lines of the Hannibal novel are very suggestive that Clarice is where she wants to be and Lecter is now beginning to heal from his past, because of this romantic relationship...
"Occasionally, on purpose, Dr. Lecter drops a teacup to shatter on the
floor. He is satisfied when it does not gather itself together. For
many months now, he has not seen Mischa in his dreams.
Someday perhaps the cup will come together. Or somewhere Starling may
hear a crossbow string and come to some unwilled awakening, if she
indeed even sleeps. We'll withdraw now, while they're dancing on the
terrace--..." -Hannibal pg 544
Hannibal Film Adaptation/Novel Comparison:
However, the film version of Hannibal takes things in a slightly different direction, as all knowledge of Mischa is omitted from the film and Clarice Starling is not psychologically manipulated into the person she becomes at the end of the novel. In fact the film's ending is dramtically different for this reason.
But as Directer Ridley Scott has stated, the film (like novel) features themes of romance, punishment, and retribution and where a conversation Lecter as with Allegra, is a reference to how Hannibal feels about Clarice Starling
Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running through the
film. He told CNN that: "Hannibal was quite a different target,
essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather
romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad
behaviour as well." During the opera scene in Florence, Lecter
attends an operatic adaptation of one of Dante's sonnets, and meets
with Detective Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you
believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single
encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could ... but would she
see through the bars of his plight and ache for him?" This scene, in
the film, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning
of. It was in reference to Starling—to their encounter in The Silence
of the Lambs.[19] The New York Times, in its review of the film, said
Hannibal, "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name"
In addition both versions feature a scene of Mason Verger setting a trap for Hannibal by capturing Clarice, as Verger figures out from listening to Hannibal Lecter's recorded tapes from his time in the insititution, that he does seem to care greatly for Starling. So he has Starling kidnapped to use as bate! (See Picture Above)
But even outside of what both the film and book kept the same, the film still retains a great deal of subtext back to the novel, including that in the film adaptation's final acts, Hannibal still demonstrates his love for Clarice. (And maybe even more so than the book's)
"Tell me Clarice, would you ever say me, Stop. If you love me, you'd
stop."
Hannibal leans into kiss Clarice, but she handcuffs him, as the FBI are on there way to their location. Hannibal finds a butchers knife and tells Clarice, "This is REALLY going to hurt." Hannibal cuts off his own hand and escapes!
As for Clarice's potential affection for Hannibal Lecter, the film remains somewhat ambiguous about it. She never does anything blatant to show she cares, and she even denies having feelings (although you can read that in more than one way), but generally she keeps to a very moral center of what she believes her duty is, which goes back to novels' passages about her father, a police officer that was killed on duty.
The final scene of the film also shows Hannibal feeding some leftover remnant's of Paul Krendler's brains to young boy. As disturbing as the scene is, it calls back Hannibal's feelings towards the innocent and his own childhood.
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– Darth Locke
Aug 26 at 13:48
1
I would downvote this 'answer' more than once if I could. Silence of the lambs is from 1991, it's based on Thomas Harris's 1988 book. Picking quotes from 1999 and 2006 books as arguments make up 90% of this post. That is a blatant logical fallacy.
– user20086
Aug 27 at 11:10
2
It's the only way to answer the question, because even if there are three versions of canon, the source material is most reliable in explaining scenes within SOTL's adaptation, as the story of Hannibal Lecter (and Clarice Starling) is ongoing in both the order of books and films. I also only picked quotes from Hannibal. Hannibal Rising only "shows" the connection and gives us an explanation for what happened to Mischa (and Hannibal) as introduced in Hannibal novel, from Hannibal to Clarice.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:05
I've added more from the Hannibal film adaptation as well. Just so people have some information coming from both versions.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:49
2
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Who could forgive that? It's an underrated classic! ;-)
– Napoleon Wilson♦
Aug 27 at 18:04
|
show 3 more comments
Yes, Hannibal Lecter sees a lot of things in Clarice:
- Someone who is smart, but not rude. (Rudeness is Hannibal's biggest pet peeve).
- Someone who has suffered in a way that he has suffered (childhood trauma, losing family),
- And eventually, someone who may be able to house his dead little sister's conscience.
- And someone to love, who can also heal his childhood trauma.
In Silence of the Lambs (book and film), it isn't perfectly clear what it is exactly that draws Hannibal to Clarice and even if he is particularly drawn to her or just screwing with her head. But the religious depictions and time dedicated to her become much clearer in the next two novels Hannibal (which takes place seven years after SOTL) and Hannibal Rising (a prequel origin and revenge story set during Lecter's childhood and late teenage years).
The Books (original source material):
In these novels, it becomes clearer that Lecter and Clarice both suffered some traumatic childhood experiences that involved losing someone they loved. For Clarice, it's her father. For Hannibal, it's his little sister.
The Hannibal novel, however, has a lot going on that isn't really explained. Hannibal somehow comes to believe in necromancy; that Clarice is a perfect vessel for his little sister's (Mischa's) consciousness.
And so I came to believe, " Dr. Lecter was saying, "that there had to
be a place in the world for Mischa, a prime place vacated for her, and
I came to think, Clarice, that the best place in the world was yours."
-Hannibal pg 535
Lecter goes through great pains to try and psychologically drive Clarice to bend her to his will, but ultimately comes to realize he has no control over what he created and Clarice declares that the best space for Mischa would be his own.
"It occurred to Dr. Lecter in that moment that with all of his
knowledge and intrusion, he could never entirely predict her, or own
her at all. He could feed the caterpillar, he could whisper through
the chrysalis; what hatched out followed its own nature and was
beyond him." - Hannibal (about Clarice) Pg523
Normally, one might assume that Hannibal wouldn't accept this, but oddly Hannibal does (because he's in love), and the two go off to Buenos Aires together. From Clarice's perspective, despite the manipulation, there may be subtext from Thomas Harris about Clarice transforming into a woman, as there are some erotic lines about nurturing Lecter from her breasts.
In the film version, Lecter also puts Clarice in a rather expensive designer dress, as he helps Clarice with her misogynistic nemesis at the FBI, Paul Krendler. These details are important, as Clarice is thought of as homely and without taste (and taste is something Hannibal cares about greatly), which could play back to how Lecter remembers his toddler sister, being sort of imperfect and messy.
At any rate, the final lines of the Hannibal novel are very suggestive that Clarice is where she wants to be and Lecter is now beginning to heal from his past, because of this romantic relationship...
"Occasionally, on purpose, Dr. Lecter drops a teacup to shatter on the
floor. He is satisfied when it does not gather itself together. For
many months now, he has not seen Mischa in his dreams.
Someday perhaps the cup will come together. Or somewhere Starling may
hear a crossbow string and come to some unwilled awakening, if she
indeed even sleeps. We'll withdraw now, while they're dancing on the
terrace--..." -Hannibal pg 544
Hannibal Film Adaptation/Novel Comparison:
However, the film version of Hannibal takes things in a slightly different direction, as all knowledge of Mischa is omitted from the film and Clarice Starling is not psychologically manipulated into the person she becomes at the end of the novel. In fact the film's ending is dramtically different for this reason.
But as Directer Ridley Scott has stated, the film (like novel) features themes of romance, punishment, and retribution and where a conversation Lecter as with Allegra, is a reference to how Hannibal feels about Clarice Starling
Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running through the
film. He told CNN that: "Hannibal was quite a different target,
essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather
romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad
behaviour as well." During the opera scene in Florence, Lecter
attends an operatic adaptation of one of Dante's sonnets, and meets
with Detective Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you
believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single
encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could ... but would she
see through the bars of his plight and ache for him?" This scene, in
the film, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning
of. It was in reference to Starling—to their encounter in The Silence
of the Lambs.[19] The New York Times, in its review of the film, said
Hannibal, "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name"
In addition both versions feature a scene of Mason Verger setting a trap for Hannibal by capturing Clarice, as Verger figures out from listening to Hannibal Lecter's recorded tapes from his time in the insititution, that he does seem to care greatly for Starling. So he has Starling kidnapped to use as bate! (See Picture Above)
But even outside of what both the film and book kept the same, the film still retains a great deal of subtext back to the novel, including that in the film adaptation's final acts, Hannibal still demonstrates his love for Clarice. (And maybe even more so than the book's)
"Tell me Clarice, would you ever say me, Stop. If you love me, you'd
stop."
Hannibal leans into kiss Clarice, but she handcuffs him, as the FBI are on there way to their location. Hannibal finds a butchers knife and tells Clarice, "This is REALLY going to hurt." Hannibal cuts off his own hand and escapes!
As for Clarice's potential affection for Hannibal Lecter, the film remains somewhat ambiguous about it. She never does anything blatant to show she cares, and she even denies having feelings (although you can read that in more than one way), but generally she keeps to a very moral center of what she believes her duty is, which goes back to novels' passages about her father, a police officer that was killed on duty.
The final scene of the film also shows Hannibal feeding some leftover remnant's of Paul Krendler's brains to young boy. As disturbing as the scene is, it calls back Hannibal's feelings towards the innocent and his own childhood.
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– Darth Locke
Aug 26 at 13:48
1
I would downvote this 'answer' more than once if I could. Silence of the lambs is from 1991, it's based on Thomas Harris's 1988 book. Picking quotes from 1999 and 2006 books as arguments make up 90% of this post. That is a blatant logical fallacy.
– user20086
Aug 27 at 11:10
2
It's the only way to answer the question, because even if there are three versions of canon, the source material is most reliable in explaining scenes within SOTL's adaptation, as the story of Hannibal Lecter (and Clarice Starling) is ongoing in both the order of books and films. I also only picked quotes from Hannibal. Hannibal Rising only "shows" the connection and gives us an explanation for what happened to Mischa (and Hannibal) as introduced in Hannibal novel, from Hannibal to Clarice.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:05
I've added more from the Hannibal film adaptation as well. Just so people have some information coming from both versions.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:49
2
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Who could forgive that? It's an underrated classic! ;-)
– Napoleon Wilson♦
Aug 27 at 18:04
|
show 3 more comments
Yes, Hannibal Lecter sees a lot of things in Clarice:
- Someone who is smart, but not rude. (Rudeness is Hannibal's biggest pet peeve).
- Someone who has suffered in a way that he has suffered (childhood trauma, losing family),
- And eventually, someone who may be able to house his dead little sister's conscience.
- And someone to love, who can also heal his childhood trauma.
In Silence of the Lambs (book and film), it isn't perfectly clear what it is exactly that draws Hannibal to Clarice and even if he is particularly drawn to her or just screwing with her head. But the religious depictions and time dedicated to her become much clearer in the next two novels Hannibal (which takes place seven years after SOTL) and Hannibal Rising (a prequel origin and revenge story set during Lecter's childhood and late teenage years).
The Books (original source material):
In these novels, it becomes clearer that Lecter and Clarice both suffered some traumatic childhood experiences that involved losing someone they loved. For Clarice, it's her father. For Hannibal, it's his little sister.
The Hannibal novel, however, has a lot going on that isn't really explained. Hannibal somehow comes to believe in necromancy; that Clarice is a perfect vessel for his little sister's (Mischa's) consciousness.
And so I came to believe, " Dr. Lecter was saying, "that there had to
be a place in the world for Mischa, a prime place vacated for her, and
I came to think, Clarice, that the best place in the world was yours."
-Hannibal pg 535
Lecter goes through great pains to try and psychologically drive Clarice to bend her to his will, but ultimately comes to realize he has no control over what he created and Clarice declares that the best space for Mischa would be his own.
"It occurred to Dr. Lecter in that moment that with all of his
knowledge and intrusion, he could never entirely predict her, or own
her at all. He could feed the caterpillar, he could whisper through
the chrysalis; what hatched out followed its own nature and was
beyond him." - Hannibal (about Clarice) Pg523
Normally, one might assume that Hannibal wouldn't accept this, but oddly Hannibal does (because he's in love), and the two go off to Buenos Aires together. From Clarice's perspective, despite the manipulation, there may be subtext from Thomas Harris about Clarice transforming into a woman, as there are some erotic lines about nurturing Lecter from her breasts.
In the film version, Lecter also puts Clarice in a rather expensive designer dress, as he helps Clarice with her misogynistic nemesis at the FBI, Paul Krendler. These details are important, as Clarice is thought of as homely and without taste (and taste is something Hannibal cares about greatly), which could play back to how Lecter remembers his toddler sister, being sort of imperfect and messy.
At any rate, the final lines of the Hannibal novel are very suggestive that Clarice is where she wants to be and Lecter is now beginning to heal from his past, because of this romantic relationship...
"Occasionally, on purpose, Dr. Lecter drops a teacup to shatter on the
floor. He is satisfied when it does not gather itself together. For
many months now, he has not seen Mischa in his dreams.
Someday perhaps the cup will come together. Or somewhere Starling may
hear a crossbow string and come to some unwilled awakening, if she
indeed even sleeps. We'll withdraw now, while they're dancing on the
terrace--..." -Hannibal pg 544
Hannibal Film Adaptation/Novel Comparison:
However, the film version of Hannibal takes things in a slightly different direction, as all knowledge of Mischa is omitted from the film and Clarice Starling is not psychologically manipulated into the person she becomes at the end of the novel. In fact the film's ending is dramtically different for this reason.
But as Directer Ridley Scott has stated, the film (like novel) features themes of romance, punishment, and retribution and where a conversation Lecter as with Allegra, is a reference to how Hannibal feels about Clarice Starling
Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running through the
film. He told CNN that: "Hannibal was quite a different target,
essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather
romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad
behaviour as well." During the opera scene in Florence, Lecter
attends an operatic adaptation of one of Dante's sonnets, and meets
with Detective Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you
believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single
encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could ... but would she
see through the bars of his plight and ache for him?" This scene, in
the film, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning
of. It was in reference to Starling—to their encounter in The Silence
of the Lambs.[19] The New York Times, in its review of the film, said
Hannibal, "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name"
In addition both versions feature a scene of Mason Verger setting a trap for Hannibal by capturing Clarice, as Verger figures out from listening to Hannibal Lecter's recorded tapes from his time in the insititution, that he does seem to care greatly for Starling. So he has Starling kidnapped to use as bate! (See Picture Above)
But even outside of what both the film and book kept the same, the film still retains a great deal of subtext back to the novel, including that in the film adaptation's final acts, Hannibal still demonstrates his love for Clarice. (And maybe even more so than the book's)
"Tell me Clarice, would you ever say me, Stop. If you love me, you'd
stop."
Hannibal leans into kiss Clarice, but she handcuffs him, as the FBI are on there way to their location. Hannibal finds a butchers knife and tells Clarice, "This is REALLY going to hurt." Hannibal cuts off his own hand and escapes!
As for Clarice's potential affection for Hannibal Lecter, the film remains somewhat ambiguous about it. She never does anything blatant to show she cares, and she even denies having feelings (although you can read that in more than one way), but generally she keeps to a very moral center of what she believes her duty is, which goes back to novels' passages about her father, a police officer that was killed on duty.
The final scene of the film also shows Hannibal feeding some leftover remnant's of Paul Krendler's brains to young boy. As disturbing as the scene is, it calls back Hannibal's feelings towards the innocent and his own childhood.
Yes, Hannibal Lecter sees a lot of things in Clarice:
- Someone who is smart, but not rude. (Rudeness is Hannibal's biggest pet peeve).
- Someone who has suffered in a way that he has suffered (childhood trauma, losing family),
- And eventually, someone who may be able to house his dead little sister's conscience.
- And someone to love, who can also heal his childhood trauma.
In Silence of the Lambs (book and film), it isn't perfectly clear what it is exactly that draws Hannibal to Clarice and even if he is particularly drawn to her or just screwing with her head. But the religious depictions and time dedicated to her become much clearer in the next two novels Hannibal (which takes place seven years after SOTL) and Hannibal Rising (a prequel origin and revenge story set during Lecter's childhood and late teenage years).
The Books (original source material):
In these novels, it becomes clearer that Lecter and Clarice both suffered some traumatic childhood experiences that involved losing someone they loved. For Clarice, it's her father. For Hannibal, it's his little sister.
The Hannibal novel, however, has a lot going on that isn't really explained. Hannibal somehow comes to believe in necromancy; that Clarice is a perfect vessel for his little sister's (Mischa's) consciousness.
And so I came to believe, " Dr. Lecter was saying, "that there had to
be a place in the world for Mischa, a prime place vacated for her, and
I came to think, Clarice, that the best place in the world was yours."
-Hannibal pg 535
Lecter goes through great pains to try and psychologically drive Clarice to bend her to his will, but ultimately comes to realize he has no control over what he created and Clarice declares that the best space for Mischa would be his own.
"It occurred to Dr. Lecter in that moment that with all of his
knowledge and intrusion, he could never entirely predict her, or own
her at all. He could feed the caterpillar, he could whisper through
the chrysalis; what hatched out followed its own nature and was
beyond him." - Hannibal (about Clarice) Pg523
Normally, one might assume that Hannibal wouldn't accept this, but oddly Hannibal does (because he's in love), and the two go off to Buenos Aires together. From Clarice's perspective, despite the manipulation, there may be subtext from Thomas Harris about Clarice transforming into a woman, as there are some erotic lines about nurturing Lecter from her breasts.
In the film version, Lecter also puts Clarice in a rather expensive designer dress, as he helps Clarice with her misogynistic nemesis at the FBI, Paul Krendler. These details are important, as Clarice is thought of as homely and without taste (and taste is something Hannibal cares about greatly), which could play back to how Lecter remembers his toddler sister, being sort of imperfect and messy.
At any rate, the final lines of the Hannibal novel are very suggestive that Clarice is where she wants to be and Lecter is now beginning to heal from his past, because of this romantic relationship...
"Occasionally, on purpose, Dr. Lecter drops a teacup to shatter on the
floor. He is satisfied when it does not gather itself together. For
many months now, he has not seen Mischa in his dreams.
Someday perhaps the cup will come together. Or somewhere Starling may
hear a crossbow string and come to some unwilled awakening, if she
indeed even sleeps. We'll withdraw now, while they're dancing on the
terrace--..." -Hannibal pg 544
Hannibal Film Adaptation/Novel Comparison:
However, the film version of Hannibal takes things in a slightly different direction, as all knowledge of Mischa is omitted from the film and Clarice Starling is not psychologically manipulated into the person she becomes at the end of the novel. In fact the film's ending is dramtically different for this reason.
But as Directer Ridley Scott has stated, the film (like novel) features themes of romance, punishment, and retribution and where a conversation Lecter as with Allegra, is a reference to how Hannibal feels about Clarice Starling
Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running through the
film. He told CNN that: "Hannibal was quite a different target,
essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather
romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad
behaviour as well." During the opera scene in Florence, Lecter
attends an operatic adaptation of one of Dante's sonnets, and meets
with Detective Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you
believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single
encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could ... but would she
see through the bars of his plight and ache for him?" This scene, in
the film, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning
of. It was in reference to Starling—to their encounter in The Silence
of the Lambs.[19] The New York Times, in its review of the film, said
Hannibal, "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name"
In addition both versions feature a scene of Mason Verger setting a trap for Hannibal by capturing Clarice, as Verger figures out from listening to Hannibal Lecter's recorded tapes from his time in the insititution, that he does seem to care greatly for Starling. So he has Starling kidnapped to use as bate! (See Picture Above)
But even outside of what both the film and book kept the same, the film still retains a great deal of subtext back to the novel, including that in the film adaptation's final acts, Hannibal still demonstrates his love for Clarice. (And maybe even more so than the book's)
"Tell me Clarice, would you ever say me, Stop. If you love me, you'd
stop."
Hannibal leans into kiss Clarice, but she handcuffs him, as the FBI are on there way to their location. Hannibal finds a butchers knife and tells Clarice, "This is REALLY going to hurt." Hannibal cuts off his own hand and escapes!
As for Clarice's potential affection for Hannibal Lecter, the film remains somewhat ambiguous about it. She never does anything blatant to show she cares, and she even denies having feelings (although you can read that in more than one way), but generally she keeps to a very moral center of what she believes her duty is, which goes back to novels' passages about her father, a police officer that was killed on duty.
The final scene of the film also shows Hannibal feeding some leftover remnant's of Paul Krendler's brains to young boy. As disturbing as the scene is, it calls back Hannibal's feelings towards the innocent and his own childhood.
edited Aug 27 at 18:02
answered Aug 26 at 13:12
Darth LockeDarth Locke
16.2k2 gold badges37 silver badges84 bronze badges
16.2k2 gold badges37 silver badges84 bronze badges
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– Darth Locke
Aug 26 at 13:48
1
I would downvote this 'answer' more than once if I could. Silence of the lambs is from 1991, it's based on Thomas Harris's 1988 book. Picking quotes from 1999 and 2006 books as arguments make up 90% of this post. That is a blatant logical fallacy.
– user20086
Aug 27 at 11:10
2
It's the only way to answer the question, because even if there are three versions of canon, the source material is most reliable in explaining scenes within SOTL's adaptation, as the story of Hannibal Lecter (and Clarice Starling) is ongoing in both the order of books and films. I also only picked quotes from Hannibal. Hannibal Rising only "shows" the connection and gives us an explanation for what happened to Mischa (and Hannibal) as introduced in Hannibal novel, from Hannibal to Clarice.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:05
I've added more from the Hannibal film adaptation as well. Just so people have some information coming from both versions.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:49
2
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Who could forgive that? It's an underrated classic! ;-)
– Napoleon Wilson♦
Aug 27 at 18:04
|
show 3 more comments
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– Darth Locke
Aug 26 at 13:48
1
I would downvote this 'answer' more than once if I could. Silence of the lambs is from 1991, it's based on Thomas Harris's 1988 book. Picking quotes from 1999 and 2006 books as arguments make up 90% of this post. That is a blatant logical fallacy.
– user20086
Aug 27 at 11:10
2
It's the only way to answer the question, because even if there are three versions of canon, the source material is most reliable in explaining scenes within SOTL's adaptation, as the story of Hannibal Lecter (and Clarice Starling) is ongoing in both the order of books and films. I also only picked quotes from Hannibal. Hannibal Rising only "shows" the connection and gives us an explanation for what happened to Mischa (and Hannibal) as introduced in Hannibal novel, from Hannibal to Clarice.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:05
I've added more from the Hannibal film adaptation as well. Just so people have some information coming from both versions.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:49
2
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Who could forgive that? It's an underrated classic! ;-)
– Napoleon Wilson♦
Aug 27 at 18:04
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– Darth Locke
Aug 26 at 13:48
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– Darth Locke
Aug 26 at 13:48
1
1
I would downvote this 'answer' more than once if I could. Silence of the lambs is from 1991, it's based on Thomas Harris's 1988 book. Picking quotes from 1999 and 2006 books as arguments make up 90% of this post. That is a blatant logical fallacy.
– user20086
Aug 27 at 11:10
I would downvote this 'answer' more than once if I could. Silence of the lambs is from 1991, it's based on Thomas Harris's 1988 book. Picking quotes from 1999 and 2006 books as arguments make up 90% of this post. That is a blatant logical fallacy.
– user20086
Aug 27 at 11:10
2
2
It's the only way to answer the question, because even if there are three versions of canon, the source material is most reliable in explaining scenes within SOTL's adaptation, as the story of Hannibal Lecter (and Clarice Starling) is ongoing in both the order of books and films. I also only picked quotes from Hannibal. Hannibal Rising only "shows" the connection and gives us an explanation for what happened to Mischa (and Hannibal) as introduced in Hannibal novel, from Hannibal to Clarice.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:05
It's the only way to answer the question, because even if there are three versions of canon, the source material is most reliable in explaining scenes within SOTL's adaptation, as the story of Hannibal Lecter (and Clarice Starling) is ongoing in both the order of books and films. I also only picked quotes from Hannibal. Hannibal Rising only "shows" the connection and gives us an explanation for what happened to Mischa (and Hannibal) as introduced in Hannibal novel, from Hannibal to Clarice.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:05
I've added more from the Hannibal film adaptation as well. Just so people have some information coming from both versions.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:49
I've added more from the Hannibal film adaptation as well. Just so people have some information coming from both versions.
– Darth Locke
Aug 27 at 13:49
2
2
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Who could forgive that? It's an underrated classic! ;-)
– Napoleon Wilson♦
Aug 27 at 18:04
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Who could forgive that? It's an underrated classic! ;-)
– Napoleon Wilson♦
Aug 27 at 18:04
|
show 3 more comments
1
I think he was curious about her.
– Vishwa
Aug 26 at 9:27
Related question from the sequel: What made Clarice so important to Hannibal Lecter?
– Ankit Sharma
Aug 26 at 9:28
Like in a way that farmers look after their cattle?
– IlludiumPu36
Aug 27 at 7:56