How to maximize area of a square inscribed in a equilateral triangle?Find the maximum area possible of equilateral triangle that inside the given squareArea of an equilateral triangleHow to find the sides of an equilateral triangle given all angles.Triangle perimeter and areaSquare with equilateral triangle drawn it it, find area of the triangle.Equilateral triangle touching three sides of a squareHow fast is the area increasing for an equilateral triangle under the given conditions?Maximize area of triangleMaximal area of equilateral triangle inside rectangle.

Which attack stat does each starter Pokemon favour in Pokemon Sword and Shield?

Co-curricular lessons between geometry and chemistry?

Bitcoin and encryption

Is the genre 'fantasy' still fantasy without magic?

What is an example of a sequence which "thins out" and is finite?

ASCII texturing

Why telnet is considered to be a protocol? Isn't it just a simple TCP send/echo program?

Insets around a clock

Is there a way to draw a simple circle or square in plain TeX/LaTeX, without relying on graphics packages?

Why are there so many binary systems?

ArcMap 10.7.1: Is it still a 32-bit software

Why does rapeseed oil turn sticky but coconut oil doesn't?

How to exit read-only mode

SMD ceramic capacitor 0805 vs 1206

TV Pilot or Movie, 80s, misfit team with powers

What does Ambassador Taylor have to do with the Trump impeachment inquiry?

Ethics: Is it ethical for a professor to conduct research using a student's ideas without giving them credit?

In-body neutral density (ND) filters?

When Using Throne room on a Throne room do you need two more action cards already in hand?

Is there a text editor that can run shell scripts?

Can the temp gzip decompression location for the integrated help documents be changed from /tmp?

Composer requesting help with a perfect translation

What definition takes up more memory, def or chardef (considering def contains a single character)?

40 amp range outlet as extension cord source



How to maximize area of a square inscribed in a equilateral triangle?


Find the maximum area possible of equilateral triangle that inside the given squareArea of an equilateral triangleHow to find the sides of an equilateral triangle given all angles.Triangle perimeter and areaSquare with equilateral triangle drawn it it, find area of the triangle.Equilateral triangle touching three sides of a squareHow fast is the area increasing for an equilateral triangle under the given conditions?Maximize area of triangleMaximal area of equilateral triangle inside rectangle.






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








8















$begingroup$


We have an equilateral triangle and want to inscribe a square, but want to do so in the way that maximizes the area of the square.



enter image description here



I sketched two possible ways, not to scale and not perfect. Note I am not sure if the second way will really have all square corners touching the triangle sides.



The second case appears to have bigger side-lengths of the square, so bigger area. But I do not know how to determine the angles involved. How to solve this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    @TobyMak This isn't a duplicate, since OP is asking which of two specific configurations is better.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 2:53






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How do you define "inscribed"? In your first sketch, one corner of the square is actually floating, not touching the triangle. I think it is safe to assume that there is only one way to inscribe a square in an equilateral triangle, and it is when one side of the square lays exactly on one side of the triangle (as in your second sketch). As a result, the problem of maximization is a non-problem.
    $endgroup$
    – virolino
    Aug 13 at 11:04











  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel Are they? Because that's not the question asked in the title.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack M
    Aug 13 at 11:22










  • $begingroup$
    @JackM It is in the consideration of the title problem that the real question has been asked.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    A very nice problem indeed! Do you consider the first case to be symmetric also, like the answer below? Or just in general, with just 3 of the tips of a square, touching the triangle and the fourth just somewhere inside the area of the triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – dmtri
    Aug 18 at 9:43


















8















$begingroup$


We have an equilateral triangle and want to inscribe a square, but want to do so in the way that maximizes the area of the square.



enter image description here



I sketched two possible ways, not to scale and not perfect. Note I am not sure if the second way will really have all square corners touching the triangle sides.



The second case appears to have bigger side-lengths of the square, so bigger area. But I do not know how to determine the angles involved. How to solve this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    @TobyMak This isn't a duplicate, since OP is asking which of two specific configurations is better.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 2:53






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How do you define "inscribed"? In your first sketch, one corner of the square is actually floating, not touching the triangle. I think it is safe to assume that there is only one way to inscribe a square in an equilateral triangle, and it is when one side of the square lays exactly on one side of the triangle (as in your second sketch). As a result, the problem of maximization is a non-problem.
    $endgroup$
    – virolino
    Aug 13 at 11:04











  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel Are they? Because that's not the question asked in the title.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack M
    Aug 13 at 11:22










  • $begingroup$
    @JackM It is in the consideration of the title problem that the real question has been asked.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    A very nice problem indeed! Do you consider the first case to be symmetric also, like the answer below? Or just in general, with just 3 of the tips of a square, touching the triangle and the fourth just somewhere inside the area of the triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – dmtri
    Aug 18 at 9:43














8













8









8


1



$begingroup$


We have an equilateral triangle and want to inscribe a square, but want to do so in the way that maximizes the area of the square.



enter image description here



I sketched two possible ways, not to scale and not perfect. Note I am not sure if the second way will really have all square corners touching the triangle sides.



The second case appears to have bigger side-lengths of the square, so bigger area. But I do not know how to determine the angles involved. How to solve this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We have an equilateral triangle and want to inscribe a square, but want to do so in the way that maximizes the area of the square.



enter image description here



I sketched two possible ways, not to scale and not perfect. Note I am not sure if the second way will really have all square corners touching the triangle sides.



The second case appears to have bigger side-lengths of the square, so bigger area. But I do not know how to determine the angles involved. How to solve this?







geometry euclidean-geometry triangles area






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 13 at 3:50









Michael Rozenberg

133k25 gold badges108 silver badges216 bronze badges




133k25 gold badges108 silver badges216 bronze badges










asked Aug 13 at 2:38









DrZ214DrZ214

1,1695 silver badges14 bronze badges




1,1695 silver badges14 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    @TobyMak This isn't a duplicate, since OP is asking which of two specific configurations is better.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 2:53






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How do you define "inscribed"? In your first sketch, one corner of the square is actually floating, not touching the triangle. I think it is safe to assume that there is only one way to inscribe a square in an equilateral triangle, and it is when one side of the square lays exactly on one side of the triangle (as in your second sketch). As a result, the problem of maximization is a non-problem.
    $endgroup$
    – virolino
    Aug 13 at 11:04











  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel Are they? Because that's not the question asked in the title.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack M
    Aug 13 at 11:22










  • $begingroup$
    @JackM It is in the consideration of the title problem that the real question has been asked.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    A very nice problem indeed! Do you consider the first case to be symmetric also, like the answer below? Or just in general, with just 3 of the tips of a square, touching the triangle and the fourth just somewhere inside the area of the triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – dmtri
    Aug 18 at 9:43

















  • $begingroup$
    @TobyMak This isn't a duplicate, since OP is asking which of two specific configurations is better.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 2:53






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How do you define "inscribed"? In your first sketch, one corner of the square is actually floating, not touching the triangle. I think it is safe to assume that there is only one way to inscribe a square in an equilateral triangle, and it is when one side of the square lays exactly on one side of the triangle (as in your second sketch). As a result, the problem of maximization is a non-problem.
    $endgroup$
    – virolino
    Aug 13 at 11:04











  • $begingroup$
    @ParclyTaxel Are they? Because that's not the question asked in the title.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack M
    Aug 13 at 11:22










  • $begingroup$
    @JackM It is in the consideration of the title problem that the real question has been asked.
    $endgroup$
    – Parcly Taxel
    Aug 13 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    A very nice problem indeed! Do you consider the first case to be symmetric also, like the answer below? Or just in general, with just 3 of the tips of a square, touching the triangle and the fourth just somewhere inside the area of the triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – dmtri
    Aug 18 at 9:43
















$begingroup$
@TobyMak This isn't a duplicate, since OP is asking which of two specific configurations is better.
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Aug 13 at 2:53




$begingroup$
@TobyMak This isn't a duplicate, since OP is asking which of two specific configurations is better.
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Aug 13 at 2:53




3




3




$begingroup$
How do you define "inscribed"? In your first sketch, one corner of the square is actually floating, not touching the triangle. I think it is safe to assume that there is only one way to inscribe a square in an equilateral triangle, and it is when one side of the square lays exactly on one side of the triangle (as in your second sketch). As a result, the problem of maximization is a non-problem.
$endgroup$
– virolino
Aug 13 at 11:04





$begingroup$
How do you define "inscribed"? In your first sketch, one corner of the square is actually floating, not touching the triangle. I think it is safe to assume that there is only one way to inscribe a square in an equilateral triangle, and it is when one side of the square lays exactly on one side of the triangle (as in your second sketch). As a result, the problem of maximization is a non-problem.
$endgroup$
– virolino
Aug 13 at 11:04













$begingroup$
@ParclyTaxel Are they? Because that's not the question asked in the title.
$endgroup$
– Jack M
Aug 13 at 11:22




$begingroup$
@ParclyTaxel Are they? Because that's not the question asked in the title.
$endgroup$
– Jack M
Aug 13 at 11:22












$begingroup$
@JackM It is in the consideration of the title problem that the real question has been asked.
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Aug 13 at 11:24




$begingroup$
@JackM It is in the consideration of the title problem that the real question has been asked.
$endgroup$
– Parcly Taxel
Aug 13 at 11:24












$begingroup$
A very nice problem indeed! Do you consider the first case to be symmetric also, like the answer below? Or just in general, with just 3 of the tips of a square, touching the triangle and the fourth just somewhere inside the area of the triangle?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Aug 18 at 9:43





$begingroup$
A very nice problem indeed! Do you consider the first case to be symmetric also, like the answer below? Or just in general, with just 3 of the tips of a square, touching the triangle and the fourth just somewhere inside the area of the triangle?
$endgroup$
– dmtri
Aug 18 at 9:43











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8

















$begingroup$

enter image description here



Let $a_1$ and $a_2$ be the side lengths of the two squares. To determine which one is larger, we simply look at their ratio below.



With the angles in the diagram,



$$d_1=frac12tan 30a_1=fracsqrt32a_1$$
$$d_2=fracsin 15sin 30a_2=frac12cos 15a_2$$



Assume both equilateral triangles have unit height.



$$1=a_1+d_1=left(1+fracsqrt32right)a_1=frac12(2+sqrt3)a_1$$
$$1=sqrt2a_2+d_2=left(sqrt2+frac12cos 15right)a_2=frac12(sqrt2+sqrt6)a_2$$



So, their ratio is



$$fraca_1a_2= fracsqrt2+sqrt62+sqrt3 =left(frac8+4sqrt37+4sqrt3right)^frac12 > 1$$






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$






















    3

















    $begingroup$

    The second configuration (square has edge contact with triangle) indeed has a bigger inscribed square. If the square has unit sides, the triangle's side is $1+frac2sqrt3$:





    The symmetric first configuration may be resolved as follows. Set the unit square's bottom corner as $(0,0)$, so that the top corner is $(0,sqrt2)$. Let the side length of the triangle be $r$. Then we have, by similar triangles,
    $$frac(sqrt3/2)r-sqrt2/2sqrt2/2=sqrt3$$
    $$r=(1+sqrt3)sqrtfrac23=2.230dots$$
    and this is greater than $1+frac2sqrt3=2.154dots$, so the first configuration has a smaller inscribed square than the second.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Maybe, you mean the second, in your the sentence before last?
      $endgroup$
      – dmtri
      Aug 18 at 9:51






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @dmtri I got my words right there, checking again.
      $endgroup$
      – Parcly Taxel
      Aug 18 at 9:52










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry , you are right , you are talking about the sides of the triangle not the square....
      $endgroup$
      – dmtri
      Aug 20 at 18:36


















    2

















    $begingroup$

    Let sides-lengths of the equilateral triangle be equal to $1$.



    Let $x$ be sides-lengths of the square in the first configuration.



    Thus, by law of sines we obtain:
    $$fracxsin60^circ=fracfrac12sin75^circ$$ or
    $$fracxfracsqrt32=fracfrac12frac1+sqrt32sqrt2$$ or
    $$x=fracsqrt3sqrt2(1+sqrt3)$$ and for the area of the square we obtain:
    $$frac32(4+2sqrt3)=frac34(2-sqrt3).$$



    Let $y$ be sides-lengths of the square in the second configuration.



    Thus, by similarity we obtain:
    $$fracy1=fracfracsqrt32-yfracsqrt32$$ or
    $$y=sqrt3(2-sqrt3)$$
    and for the area of the square we obtain:
    $$3(7-4sqrt3),$$ which is a bit of greater.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$
















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3321643%2fhow-to-maximize-area-of-a-square-inscribed-in-a-equilateral-triangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown


























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8

















      $begingroup$

      enter image description here



      Let $a_1$ and $a_2$ be the side lengths of the two squares. To determine which one is larger, we simply look at their ratio below.



      With the angles in the diagram,



      $$d_1=frac12tan 30a_1=fracsqrt32a_1$$
      $$d_2=fracsin 15sin 30a_2=frac12cos 15a_2$$



      Assume both equilateral triangles have unit height.



      $$1=a_1+d_1=left(1+fracsqrt32right)a_1=frac12(2+sqrt3)a_1$$
      $$1=sqrt2a_2+d_2=left(sqrt2+frac12cos 15right)a_2=frac12(sqrt2+sqrt6)a_2$$



      So, their ratio is



      $$fraca_1a_2= fracsqrt2+sqrt62+sqrt3 =left(frac8+4sqrt37+4sqrt3right)^frac12 > 1$$






      share|cite|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



















        8

















        $begingroup$

        enter image description here



        Let $a_1$ and $a_2$ be the side lengths of the two squares. To determine which one is larger, we simply look at their ratio below.



        With the angles in the diagram,



        $$d_1=frac12tan 30a_1=fracsqrt32a_1$$
        $$d_2=fracsin 15sin 30a_2=frac12cos 15a_2$$



        Assume both equilateral triangles have unit height.



        $$1=a_1+d_1=left(1+fracsqrt32right)a_1=frac12(2+sqrt3)a_1$$
        $$1=sqrt2a_2+d_2=left(sqrt2+frac12cos 15right)a_2=frac12(sqrt2+sqrt6)a_2$$



        So, their ratio is



        $$fraca_1a_2= fracsqrt2+sqrt62+sqrt3 =left(frac8+4sqrt37+4sqrt3right)^frac12 > 1$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $endgroup$

















          8















          8











          8







          $begingroup$

          enter image description here



          Let $a_1$ and $a_2$ be the side lengths of the two squares. To determine which one is larger, we simply look at their ratio below.



          With the angles in the diagram,



          $$d_1=frac12tan 30a_1=fracsqrt32a_1$$
          $$d_2=fracsin 15sin 30a_2=frac12cos 15a_2$$



          Assume both equilateral triangles have unit height.



          $$1=a_1+d_1=left(1+fracsqrt32right)a_1=frac12(2+sqrt3)a_1$$
          $$1=sqrt2a_2+d_2=left(sqrt2+frac12cos 15right)a_2=frac12(sqrt2+sqrt6)a_2$$



          So, their ratio is



          $$fraca_1a_2= fracsqrt2+sqrt62+sqrt3 =left(frac8+4sqrt37+4sqrt3right)^frac12 > 1$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          $endgroup$



          enter image description here



          Let $a_1$ and $a_2$ be the side lengths of the two squares. To determine which one is larger, we simply look at their ratio below.



          With the angles in the diagram,



          $$d_1=frac12tan 30a_1=fracsqrt32a_1$$
          $$d_2=fracsin 15sin 30a_2=frac12cos 15a_2$$



          Assume both equilateral triangles have unit height.



          $$1=a_1+d_1=left(1+fracsqrt32right)a_1=frac12(2+sqrt3)a_1$$
          $$1=sqrt2a_2+d_2=left(sqrt2+frac12cos 15right)a_2=frac12(sqrt2+sqrt6)a_2$$



          So, their ratio is



          $$fraca_1a_2= fracsqrt2+sqrt62+sqrt3 =left(frac8+4sqrt37+4sqrt3right)^frac12 > 1$$







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer




          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 16 at 17:30

























          answered Aug 13 at 3:55









          QuantoQuanto

          12.9k1 gold badge5 silver badges21 bronze badges




          12.9k1 gold badge5 silver badges21 bronze badges


























              3

















              $begingroup$

              The second configuration (square has edge contact with triangle) indeed has a bigger inscribed square. If the square has unit sides, the triangle's side is $1+frac2sqrt3$:





              The symmetric first configuration may be resolved as follows. Set the unit square's bottom corner as $(0,0)$, so that the top corner is $(0,sqrt2)$. Let the side length of the triangle be $r$. Then we have, by similar triangles,
              $$frac(sqrt3/2)r-sqrt2/2sqrt2/2=sqrt3$$
              $$r=(1+sqrt3)sqrtfrac23=2.230dots$$
              and this is greater than $1+frac2sqrt3=2.154dots$, so the first configuration has a smaller inscribed square than the second.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                Maybe, you mean the second, in your the sentence before last?
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 18 at 9:51






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @dmtri I got my words right there, checking again.
                $endgroup$
                – Parcly Taxel
                Aug 18 at 9:52










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry , you are right , you are talking about the sides of the triangle not the square....
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 20 at 18:36















              3

















              $begingroup$

              The second configuration (square has edge contact with triangle) indeed has a bigger inscribed square. If the square has unit sides, the triangle's side is $1+frac2sqrt3$:





              The symmetric first configuration may be resolved as follows. Set the unit square's bottom corner as $(0,0)$, so that the top corner is $(0,sqrt2)$. Let the side length of the triangle be $r$. Then we have, by similar triangles,
              $$frac(sqrt3/2)r-sqrt2/2sqrt2/2=sqrt3$$
              $$r=(1+sqrt3)sqrtfrac23=2.230dots$$
              and this is greater than $1+frac2sqrt3=2.154dots$, so the first configuration has a smaller inscribed square than the second.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                Maybe, you mean the second, in your the sentence before last?
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 18 at 9:51






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @dmtri I got my words right there, checking again.
                $endgroup$
                – Parcly Taxel
                Aug 18 at 9:52










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry , you are right , you are talking about the sides of the triangle not the square....
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 20 at 18:36













              3















              3











              3







              $begingroup$

              The second configuration (square has edge contact with triangle) indeed has a bigger inscribed square. If the square has unit sides, the triangle's side is $1+frac2sqrt3$:





              The symmetric first configuration may be resolved as follows. Set the unit square's bottom corner as $(0,0)$, so that the top corner is $(0,sqrt2)$. Let the side length of the triangle be $r$. Then we have, by similar triangles,
              $$frac(sqrt3/2)r-sqrt2/2sqrt2/2=sqrt3$$
              $$r=(1+sqrt3)sqrtfrac23=2.230dots$$
              and this is greater than $1+frac2sqrt3=2.154dots$, so the first configuration has a smaller inscribed square than the second.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$



              The second configuration (square has edge contact with triangle) indeed has a bigger inscribed square. If the square has unit sides, the triangle's side is $1+frac2sqrt3$:





              The symmetric first configuration may be resolved as follows. Set the unit square's bottom corner as $(0,0)$, so that the top corner is $(0,sqrt2)$. Let the side length of the triangle be $r$. Then we have, by similar triangles,
              $$frac(sqrt3/2)r-sqrt2/2sqrt2/2=sqrt3$$
              $$r=(1+sqrt3)sqrtfrac23=2.230dots$$
              and this is greater than $1+frac2sqrt3=2.154dots$, so the first configuration has a smaller inscribed square than the second.







              share|cite|improve this answer













              share|cite|improve this answer




              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Aug 13 at 2:53









              Parcly TaxelParcly Taxel

              53.4k13 gold badges81 silver badges120 bronze badges




              53.4k13 gold badges81 silver badges120 bronze badges














              • $begingroup$
                Maybe, you mean the second, in your the sentence before last?
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 18 at 9:51






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @dmtri I got my words right there, checking again.
                $endgroup$
                – Parcly Taxel
                Aug 18 at 9:52










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry , you are right , you are talking about the sides of the triangle not the square....
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 20 at 18:36
















              • $begingroup$
                Maybe, you mean the second, in your the sentence before last?
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 18 at 9:51






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @dmtri I got my words right there, checking again.
                $endgroup$
                – Parcly Taxel
                Aug 18 at 9:52










              • $begingroup$
                Sorry , you are right , you are talking about the sides of the triangle not the square....
                $endgroup$
                – dmtri
                Aug 20 at 18:36















              $begingroup$
              Maybe, you mean the second, in your the sentence before last?
              $endgroup$
              – dmtri
              Aug 18 at 9:51




              $begingroup$
              Maybe, you mean the second, in your the sentence before last?
              $endgroup$
              – dmtri
              Aug 18 at 9:51




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              @dmtri I got my words right there, checking again.
              $endgroup$
              – Parcly Taxel
              Aug 18 at 9:52




              $begingroup$
              @dmtri I got my words right there, checking again.
              $endgroup$
              – Parcly Taxel
              Aug 18 at 9:52












              $begingroup$
              Sorry , you are right , you are talking about the sides of the triangle not the square....
              $endgroup$
              – dmtri
              Aug 20 at 18:36




              $begingroup$
              Sorry , you are right , you are talking about the sides of the triangle not the square....
              $endgroup$
              – dmtri
              Aug 20 at 18:36











              2

















              $begingroup$

              Let sides-lengths of the equilateral triangle be equal to $1$.



              Let $x$ be sides-lengths of the square in the first configuration.



              Thus, by law of sines we obtain:
              $$fracxsin60^circ=fracfrac12sin75^circ$$ or
              $$fracxfracsqrt32=fracfrac12frac1+sqrt32sqrt2$$ or
              $$x=fracsqrt3sqrt2(1+sqrt3)$$ and for the area of the square we obtain:
              $$frac32(4+2sqrt3)=frac34(2-sqrt3).$$



              Let $y$ be sides-lengths of the square in the second configuration.



              Thus, by similarity we obtain:
              $$fracy1=fracfracsqrt32-yfracsqrt32$$ or
              $$y=sqrt3(2-sqrt3)$$
              and for the area of the square we obtain:
              $$3(7-4sqrt3),$$ which is a bit of greater.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$



















                2

















                $begingroup$

                Let sides-lengths of the equilateral triangle be equal to $1$.



                Let $x$ be sides-lengths of the square in the first configuration.



                Thus, by law of sines we obtain:
                $$fracxsin60^circ=fracfrac12sin75^circ$$ or
                $$fracxfracsqrt32=fracfrac12frac1+sqrt32sqrt2$$ or
                $$x=fracsqrt3sqrt2(1+sqrt3)$$ and for the area of the square we obtain:
                $$frac32(4+2sqrt3)=frac34(2-sqrt3).$$



                Let $y$ be sides-lengths of the square in the second configuration.



                Thus, by similarity we obtain:
                $$fracy1=fracfracsqrt32-yfracsqrt32$$ or
                $$y=sqrt3(2-sqrt3)$$
                and for the area of the square we obtain:
                $$3(7-4sqrt3),$$ which is a bit of greater.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                $endgroup$

















                  2















                  2











                  2







                  $begingroup$

                  Let sides-lengths of the equilateral triangle be equal to $1$.



                  Let $x$ be sides-lengths of the square in the first configuration.



                  Thus, by law of sines we obtain:
                  $$fracxsin60^circ=fracfrac12sin75^circ$$ or
                  $$fracxfracsqrt32=fracfrac12frac1+sqrt32sqrt2$$ or
                  $$x=fracsqrt3sqrt2(1+sqrt3)$$ and for the area of the square we obtain:
                  $$frac32(4+2sqrt3)=frac34(2-sqrt3).$$



                  Let $y$ be sides-lengths of the square in the second configuration.



                  Thus, by similarity we obtain:
                  $$fracy1=fracfracsqrt32-yfracsqrt32$$ or
                  $$y=sqrt3(2-sqrt3)$$
                  and for the area of the square we obtain:
                  $$3(7-4sqrt3),$$ which is a bit of greater.






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  $endgroup$



                  Let sides-lengths of the equilateral triangle be equal to $1$.



                  Let $x$ be sides-lengths of the square in the first configuration.



                  Thus, by law of sines we obtain:
                  $$fracxsin60^circ=fracfrac12sin75^circ$$ or
                  $$fracxfracsqrt32=fracfrac12frac1+sqrt32sqrt2$$ or
                  $$x=fracsqrt3sqrt2(1+sqrt3)$$ and for the area of the square we obtain:
                  $$frac32(4+2sqrt3)=frac34(2-sqrt3).$$



                  Let $y$ be sides-lengths of the square in the second configuration.



                  Thus, by similarity we obtain:
                  $$fracy1=fracfracsqrt32-yfracsqrt32$$ or
                  $$y=sqrt3(2-sqrt3)$$
                  and for the area of the square we obtain:
                  $$3(7-4sqrt3),$$ which is a bit of greater.







                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer




                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 13 at 3:45









                  Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg

                  133k25 gold badges108 silver badges216 bronze badges




                  133k25 gold badges108 silver badges216 bronze badges































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3321643%2fhow-to-maximize-area-of-a-square-inscribed-in-a-equilateral-triangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown









                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                      Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                      Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?