How to keep processes running after ending ssh session? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to use screen command?Keep running a python program even after logging-off the ssh sessionExecute java from terminal and let it run even after the ssh session endsKeep running a program in terminal over SSH after “Write failed: Broken pipe”How to run an application on a headless Ubuntu?Run process after exiting puttyhow to leave a process running in backgroun on a terminalLeave Ubuntu server to compute in backgroundHow Should I Be Accessing My Server?Run a program background even close the ssh connectionHow to restore a process after logging out of ssh connection?Is it possible to continue an ssh session upon each re-connection?SSH'ing to my machine attaches an existing screen session and detaching it ends my SSH sessionKeep the running processes alive when disconneting the remote connectionShare SSH Session at loginRecognize when ssh session closedrecover ssh session connectionForward X session over SSH for an already-running program?trigger x-gnome-autostart after reboot over sshRunning a process through SSH command and keeping it alive
What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Simulation of a banking system with an Account class in C++
Problems with Ubuntu mount /tmp
Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?
Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?
Can the DM override racial traits?
Create an outline of font
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
Can undead you have reanimated wait inside a portable hole?
"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?
I could not break this equation. Please help me
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Match Roman Numerals
Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?
What's the point in a preamp?
How to stretch delimiters to envolve matrices inside of a kbordermatrix?
How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?
Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?
Derivation tree not rendering
He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s
How to keep processes running after ending ssh session?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to use screen command?Keep running a python program even after logging-off the ssh sessionExecute java from terminal and let it run even after the ssh session endsKeep running a program in terminal over SSH after “Write failed: Broken pipe”How to run an application on a headless Ubuntu?Run process after exiting puttyhow to leave a process running in backgroun on a terminalLeave Ubuntu server to compute in backgroundHow Should I Be Accessing My Server?Run a program background even close the ssh connectionHow to restore a process after logging out of ssh connection?Is it possible to continue an ssh session upon each re-connection?SSH'ing to my machine attaches an existing screen session and detaching it ends my SSH sessionKeep the running processes alive when disconneting the remote connectionShare SSH Session at loginRecognize when ssh session closedrecover ssh session connectionForward X session over SSH for an already-running program?trigger x-gnome-autostart after reboot over sshRunning a process through SSH command and keeping it alive
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Let's say I launch a bunch of processes from a ssh session. Is it possible to terminate the ssh session while keeping those processes running on the remote machine?
ssh
add a comment |
Let's say I launch a bunch of processes from a ssh session. Is it possible to terminate the ssh session while keeping those processes running on the remote machine?
ssh
2
Related: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4004/…
– Anton Tarasenko
Nov 23 '17 at 9:23
add a comment |
Let's say I launch a bunch of processes from a ssh session. Is it possible to terminate the ssh session while keeping those processes running on the remote machine?
ssh
Let's say I launch a bunch of processes from a ssh session. Is it possible to terminate the ssh session while keeping those processes running on the remote machine?
ssh
ssh
asked Oct 21 '10 at 12:09
Olivier LalondeOlivier Lalonde
21.3k51112141
21.3k51112141
2
Related: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4004/…
– Anton Tarasenko
Nov 23 '17 at 9:23
add a comment |
2
Related: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4004/…
– Anton Tarasenko
Nov 23 '17 at 9:23
2
2
Related: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4004/…
– Anton Tarasenko
Nov 23 '17 at 9:23
Related: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4004/…
– Anton Tarasenko
Nov 23 '17 at 9:23
add a comment |
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
You should look for modern alternatives like tmux
.
tmux
is superior to screen
for many reasons, here are just some examples:
- Windows can be moved between session and even linked to multiple sessions
- Windows can be split horizontally and vertically into panes
- Support for UTF-8 and 256 colour terminals
- Sessions can be controlled from the shell without the need to enter a session
Basic Functionality
To get the same functionality as explained in the answer recommending screen
, you would need to do the following:
- ssh into the remote machine
- start
tmux
by typingtmux
into the shell - start the process you want inside the started
tmux
session - leave/detach the
tmux
session by typing Ctrl+b and then d
You can now safely log off from the remote machine, your process will keep running inside tmux
. When you come back again and want to check the status of your process you can use tmux attach
to attach to your tmux
session.
If you want to have multiple sessions running side-by-side, you should name each session using Ctrl+b and $
. You can get a list of the currently running sessions using tmux list-sessions
, now attach to a running session with command tmux attach-session -t 0
.
tmux
can do much more advanced things than handle a single window in a single session. For more information have a look in man tmux
or the tmux GitHub page. In particular, here's an FAQ about the main differences between screen
and tmux
.
3
@CraigM Usescreen -x -r [screenname]
orscreen -rx
for short if you have only one screen session active. This allows you to attach an existing screen instance.
– Lekensteyn
Nov 25 '12 at 10:31
4
This advice helped me with the same problem but I think it includes a typo. I am pretty sure that you need to typeCtrl-b
and thend
in order to leave/detach thetmux
session. Certainly that is the case for the version oftmux
on my Ubuntu 12.04.
– cxrodgers
Dec 25 '12 at 8:31
14
I made a mistake while following the above instructions. I will share it if anybody might fall into the same mistake: I started tmux in the shell of my own computer instead of the shell of the remote computer. One needs to start tmux in the shell of remote computer.
– Mert Nuhoglu
Aug 22 '14 at 14:53
3
Screen is now being developed again: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html Could you update your answer?
– muru
Nov 3 '14 at 3:27
4
Alternatively, runtmux detach
instead of typingctrl-b d
– Andrew MacFie
Nov 3 '15 at 22:51
|
show 9 more comments
Option 1: nohup
The best way is often the simplest.
nohup long-running-command &
It was made specifically for this, it even logs stdout to nohup.log
.
man nohup
Option 2: bg
If you want to "background" some already running tasks, then your best bet is to Ctrl+Z then run
bg
to put your most recent suspended task to background, allowing it to continue running.
Then a quick disown
should keep the process running after you log out.
screen
and others can do it, but that's not what they're for. I recommend nohup
for tasks you know your going to leave behind and bg
for tasks your already running and don't want to re-start.
Keep in mind, both are bash specific. If you're not using bash, then the commands could be different.
3
I would recommend to dodisown -h
– Michele
Aug 21 '17 at 16:45
interestingly screen and tmux doesn't work for miner, bur nohup works
– Yasin Okumuş
Nov 1 '17 at 19:04
1
bg
+disown
didn't work for me. I had a deployment script running I forgot to start inside tmux, and needed to leave early for a meeting. The script continuously outputs progress to the shell.ctrl+z
stopped the process, returning me to bash.bg
resumed the process, but it also resumed outputting the status to bash, making it impossible to see what I was typing. However, adisown
command produced "disown: current: no such job"
– BrianHVB
Sep 11 '18 at 23:42
this didn't work for me withjulia myFile.jl
for whatever reason. tmux does and is great.
– kilgoretrout
Oct 25 '18 at 5:11
This worked for me, thank you so much
– Chad
Mar 24 at 3:20
add a comment |
You could do that by using screen
.
Type man screen
to find out more or read this screen man page.
Simple scenario:
ssh into your remote box. Type
screen
Then start the process you want.Press Ctrl-A then Ctrl-D. This will "detach" your screen session but leave your processes running. You can now log out of the remote box.
If you want to come back later, log on again and type
screen -r
This will "resume" your screen session, and you can see the output of your process.
32
I will usually name my screen sessions usingscreen -S name
to make it easier to connect to the correct one later.
– David Oneill
Nov 24 '12 at 22:37
The link is down
– Gab是好人
Sep 16 '16 at 13:50
1
Personally, I'm working on a box without any package control software. After spending about half an hour building dependencies for TMUX (which I personally have experience with and like) from source, it became clear that screen was the better and simpler solution for me. TL;DR: the optimal solution to this problem depends on the use case, the machine, and how much time you have to get set up. Thanks for this answer :)
– Max von Hippel
Nov 1 '17 at 3:30
Combination withscreen -S
before leave andscreen -r
when coming back is amazing!
– Meloman
Mar 14 '18 at 10:03
Thanks for this. This solution worked for me while tmux did not (I use a version of bash for windows while ssh'ing into a linux machine)
– Michael Sorensen
May 13 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
Screen and nohup is the better way, but if you have to detach a process already running without screen or nohup you can run disown command.
disown [-ar] [-h] [
jobspec
… |
pid
… ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active jobs. If the
-h
option is given, the job is not removed from the table, but is marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell receives a SIGHUP. If jobspec is not present, and neither the-a
nor the-r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If no jobspec is supplied, the-a
option means to remove or mark all jobs; the-r
option without a jobspec argument restricts operation to running jobs.
With disown you can close the terminal and get the process running on the machine.
10
This is also my favourite way to do it. I frequently usedisown -a && exit
– Stefano Palazzo♦
Oct 21 '10 at 17:45
1
Perfect. This is a lovely command and deserves all the upvotes!
– Greg
Apr 29 '14 at 10:38
8
one word of caution, I stopped a running process with Ctrl-Z and didn't start it in the background before callingdisown
and it killed it.
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:07
3
May crash if it wants to write to the terminal. Redirecting output of a running process isn't as easy. Better to start it properly with nohup.
– jiggunjer
Aug 25 '16 at 12:42
1
This is a good answer, because it directly answers the question. The author of the question asked what to do after having already executed a bunch of long running commands. Most of these answers let you know what to do before you execute the commands.
– q0rban
Aug 17 '17 at 0:24
add a comment |
I was stuck in a large mv so I wasn't in a position to stop the process, setup screen and then start it again. I managed to exit the ssh session with the process running by essentially doing the following steps:
- ssh [server]
- command
Ctrl+Z- bg
- disown [process pid optional, defaults to last]
- exit
Step 3 pauses the current process (e.g. my 'mv' command).
Step 4 puts the paused process in to the background and resumes it.
Step 5 lets you disown the process.** To get a list of jobs simply type jobs
before.
** Regarding disown (from bash manual):
disown [-ar] [-h] [jobspec ... | pid ... ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active
jobs. If jobspec is not present, and neither the -a nor the -r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If the -h option
is given, each jobspec is not removed from the table, but is
marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell
receives a SIGHUP. If no jobspec is supplied, the -a option
means to remove or mark all jobs; the -r option without a job‐
spec argument restricts operation to running jobs. The return
value is 0 unless a jobspec does not specify a valid job.
2
Built-in's are always my first choice :) THX
– ken_oy
Apr 2 '18 at 13:30
This answer should be marked as right. To install and getting used to screen for solving this problem is exaggerated.
– Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter
Apr 5 '18 at 11:41
This is very helpful when you have already started any command and which is being running for long. Terminating and starting it in a TMUX Session will take time
– Deepali Mittal
May 14 '18 at 10:54
1
@tom-brossman: Please watch out for unnecessary edits like this one! If invoked without job specification thedisown
built-in command acts on the most recent background job.
– David Foerster
Oct 29 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
There are two major programs you can use to maintain programs and terminal state over multiple ssh connections. They are screen (the incumbent, but unfortunately unmaintained. Apparently being actively developed now) and tmux (newer, actively maintained). Byobu is a front end that can run on top of their of these systems and offer additional ubuntu status information. On new installations it will use tmux as a backend, if you have an older installation of byobu and an existing config it will maintain the previous backend, be it screen or tmux.
Byobu
Byobu can be installed on the computer by doing so in a Debian-based machine:
sudo aptitude install byobu
Using yum, you do
su -c 'yum install byobu'
It's also possible to install byobu on other distributions.
Using byobu
You can start byobu by running byobu
on the host machine after connecting using ssh.
This will give you a shell that looks like this:
You can also use Byobu Terminal on a Ubuntu machine with -X option and easily have a perfectly working byobu.
Usage:
Start byobu by typing byobu
.
You can press F2 to create a new window within the current session, F3-F4 to switch between the various windows.
The best part about byobu is, you dont have to actually kill the processes running in the terminal to leave the terminal. You can simply send screen/tmux (the skeleton of byobu) to background and resume the next time you come:
- To leave byobu and keeep it running (detach) press F6.
The next time you come, just do
byobu
and you sholud be back right where you were.
You can also create various byobu sessions by byobu -S session1
and so on. And you can connect to either of them when you come back.
You can do much more using Byobu. Use it!
Some definitive guides are here, or here.
I tried using byobu from a PuTTY-based session to my Ubuntu box, but I get the status line repeated and scrolling on the display. Although it detached properly wen pressing F6, it was not a useable solution in my setup.
– jfmessier
Nov 6 '13 at 17:47
1
@jfmessier It's because PuTTY doesn't take ncurses (utf-8 basically) well. It's possible to eliminate this problem by following this thread - stackoverflow.com/questions/10731099/…
– SiddharthaRT
Nov 7 '13 at 10:40
This is awesome! 1. it gives me a colored bash prompt that I cannot seem to enable with bash as my default shell and 2. I get to run 2 bots at the same time and still have another terminal to do work on! @SiddharthaRT you deserve an upvote sir!
– Dev
Jul 22 '16 at 6:53
add a comment |
You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job.
You can use nohup but modern wisdom suggests you use screen or byobu as your login so you can detach and leave things running.
Screen has the advantage that you can detach from one machine and reattach from another which is handy if you want to check on long running processes that run beyond the end of the working day.
There is a reasonable getting started guide to screen here.
byobu puts an easy to use interface on top of screen with menus etc. It's also the current implementation of screen on newer ubuntu. F2 to start a new terminal F3/F4 to toggle back and forth and F6 to disconnect. Type exit to actually end terminals permanently.
byobu uses tmux these days..
– scottl
Nov 28 '12 at 7:04
12
"You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job." -- no, you can usedisown
to achieve this. See @bassgey's answer
– Rich
May 23 '13 at 16:11
after struggling to learn screen and tmux....byobu brought tears to my eyes
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:06
disown
and if needed justCtrl-z
, thenbg
to get it of the active terminal and to the background. Then,disown
.
– mimoralea
Nov 21 '17 at 20:49
add a comment |
Hey, while I agreed that screen is the most efective option.
You can use vncserver and then start the process on it.
Also if your only interes is to have the process running and no need to take control back of it, and utterly most important you were not aware you will need to close the session and you have the process already running, you are not of luck if you used bash as the shell
First you need to send the process to background by typing Ctrl+Z followed by bg %1 (the number depends on the job number, usually it is 1, but you can easily pull the list using the command jobs)
Finally invoke the command disown (followed by the jobid ... same as with bg command)
This will remove the parent-child relationship between your shell and the process in background, preventing it to die when your shell is terminated.
2
This answer is the best! Why is everyone talking aboutscreen
, the question was posed post-login event, how to keep the processes running, now after logging in but before starting them. Great answer Jorge, you've really helped me! :)
– jwbensley
Aug 10 '12 at 17:13
1
Simplybg
(without%1
) is often enough, since the default is the current job
– Walter Tross
Nov 23 '12 at 21:55
It would be nice to have a comprehensive answer: A priori (setting up in advance): ascii terminal screen (old), tmux (neewer); X windows: vnc (old, still maintained), xpra (newer), with xpra being rootless. A posterior (persisting after you started): ^Z, disown, ... But I am too lazy to flesh it out more than this.
– Krazy Glew
Jul 12 '18 at 23:02
add a comment |
For a single shell script that I have running over a long period of time, I will login, and run the process in the background using '&'.
Example:
/path/to/my/script &
I've logged out and disconnected my SSH session. When I log in some time later, the script is still executing as proven by continuous data collection from the script.
3
Yes, I would like to know how screen / tmux is better than this simple solution.
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:51
Yes, I can see this on my ubuntu also, but it should not happen in theory. I don't understand why
– Daniel Pinyol
Apr 22 '16 at 13:08
1
@MadsSkjern Because you can't enter any input into the script using this method.
– Ken Sharp
Feb 10 '17 at 22:18
1
@MadsSkjern the reason is that if you run processes like this with&
if you log out and in to your SSH session, the process will still be running however you will not be able to see the outputof that process (if your script echoed something you won't see it, but if it writes a file the file will be there)
– DarkCygnus
Aug 24 '17 at 16:20
add a comment |
You should check out GNU Screen and see if it helps you. Depending on how you need you application to run in realtime, it may cause more issues than it solves, but at least it will allow you to resume your session as if you never left it.
How to use :
- Use the command
screen
for the first start, scroll through the introduction messages, you should be handed a terminal. - C-a C-c opens another terminal
- C-a C-k kills a terminal
- You can use C-a C-Space and C-a C-Backspace to cycle through terminals
- C-a C-a is handy if you're mostly using only two terminals
- C-a C-d detachs the current screen session and exits screens. You can then use
screen -r
to resume that session. You can have several detached screen sessions at once, in this case you'll be displayed a list of available sessions.
There are many other options, for example split screens, and also all shortcuts are fully customizable.
add a comment |
Simplest answer...
ctrl+z will suspend the running program
"bg" will run it in the background
5
Without disowning the process (with something likedisown
ornohup
), this will not usually keep the process running after the end of the SSH session.
– Eliah Kagan
Aug 13 '13 at 0:32
3
On my Ubuntu server, with default setup, it really does keep running!
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:53
add a comment |
The easiest way is to run your command in the background with &
. Then just write:
disown -a
add a comment |
While everyone says to use disown
(the only option you have after you already started the process), nohup
, or even running the command in screen
, which is useful if you want to see all the output from the command... I'm a fan of screen
.. I still have tried most recent mainstream distributions of Linux and simply putting the job in the background and quitting does not cause all the processes that are running to die. There must be a global setting or something. I'm trying this on some pretty old systems (slackware 12) and my test script keeps running until I manually kill it:
shell$ cat > test.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
while(1)
sleep(1);
shell$ perl ./test.pl &
shell$ exit
logout
shell$ ps aux test.pl
mymom 31337 1 0 13:25 ? 00:00:00 perl ./test.pl
shell$
While I agree that screen
would be the best way to run this, even if my script wrote to log files or whatever.. I've never needed to use disown -a
or nohup
unless it was out of complete paranoia. Maybe someone can shed some light on how bash behaves by default? Maybe some system administrators change the defaults on large shells to keep their users' processes from overloading the system?
If you have any further query please ask it as a new question
– heemayl
Jul 30 '15 at 2:05
add a comment |
Instead of :
cmd options;
Add before nohup
:
nohup cmd options &
Then, you will be able to see the console stdout by :
tail -f nohup.out
add a comment |
protected by heemayl Sep 16 '15 at 20:52
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should look for modern alternatives like tmux
.
tmux
is superior to screen
for many reasons, here are just some examples:
- Windows can be moved between session and even linked to multiple sessions
- Windows can be split horizontally and vertically into panes
- Support for UTF-8 and 256 colour terminals
- Sessions can be controlled from the shell without the need to enter a session
Basic Functionality
To get the same functionality as explained in the answer recommending screen
, you would need to do the following:
- ssh into the remote machine
- start
tmux
by typingtmux
into the shell - start the process you want inside the started
tmux
session - leave/detach the
tmux
session by typing Ctrl+b and then d
You can now safely log off from the remote machine, your process will keep running inside tmux
. When you come back again and want to check the status of your process you can use tmux attach
to attach to your tmux
session.
If you want to have multiple sessions running side-by-side, you should name each session using Ctrl+b and $
. You can get a list of the currently running sessions using tmux list-sessions
, now attach to a running session with command tmux attach-session -t 0
.
tmux
can do much more advanced things than handle a single window in a single session. For more information have a look in man tmux
or the tmux GitHub page. In particular, here's an FAQ about the main differences between screen
and tmux
.
3
@CraigM Usescreen -x -r [screenname]
orscreen -rx
for short if you have only one screen session active. This allows you to attach an existing screen instance.
– Lekensteyn
Nov 25 '12 at 10:31
4
This advice helped me with the same problem but I think it includes a typo. I am pretty sure that you need to typeCtrl-b
and thend
in order to leave/detach thetmux
session. Certainly that is the case for the version oftmux
on my Ubuntu 12.04.
– cxrodgers
Dec 25 '12 at 8:31
14
I made a mistake while following the above instructions. I will share it if anybody might fall into the same mistake: I started tmux in the shell of my own computer instead of the shell of the remote computer. One needs to start tmux in the shell of remote computer.
– Mert Nuhoglu
Aug 22 '14 at 14:53
3
Screen is now being developed again: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html Could you update your answer?
– muru
Nov 3 '14 at 3:27
4
Alternatively, runtmux detach
instead of typingctrl-b d
– Andrew MacFie
Nov 3 '15 at 22:51
|
show 9 more comments
You should look for modern alternatives like tmux
.
tmux
is superior to screen
for many reasons, here are just some examples:
- Windows can be moved between session and even linked to multiple sessions
- Windows can be split horizontally and vertically into panes
- Support for UTF-8 and 256 colour terminals
- Sessions can be controlled from the shell without the need to enter a session
Basic Functionality
To get the same functionality as explained in the answer recommending screen
, you would need to do the following:
- ssh into the remote machine
- start
tmux
by typingtmux
into the shell - start the process you want inside the started
tmux
session - leave/detach the
tmux
session by typing Ctrl+b and then d
You can now safely log off from the remote machine, your process will keep running inside tmux
. When you come back again and want to check the status of your process you can use tmux attach
to attach to your tmux
session.
If you want to have multiple sessions running side-by-side, you should name each session using Ctrl+b and $
. You can get a list of the currently running sessions using tmux list-sessions
, now attach to a running session with command tmux attach-session -t 0
.
tmux
can do much more advanced things than handle a single window in a single session. For more information have a look in man tmux
or the tmux GitHub page. In particular, here's an FAQ about the main differences between screen
and tmux
.
3
@CraigM Usescreen -x -r [screenname]
orscreen -rx
for short if you have only one screen session active. This allows you to attach an existing screen instance.
– Lekensteyn
Nov 25 '12 at 10:31
4
This advice helped me with the same problem but I think it includes a typo. I am pretty sure that you need to typeCtrl-b
and thend
in order to leave/detach thetmux
session. Certainly that is the case for the version oftmux
on my Ubuntu 12.04.
– cxrodgers
Dec 25 '12 at 8:31
14
I made a mistake while following the above instructions. I will share it if anybody might fall into the same mistake: I started tmux in the shell of my own computer instead of the shell of the remote computer. One needs to start tmux in the shell of remote computer.
– Mert Nuhoglu
Aug 22 '14 at 14:53
3
Screen is now being developed again: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html Could you update your answer?
– muru
Nov 3 '14 at 3:27
4
Alternatively, runtmux detach
instead of typingctrl-b d
– Andrew MacFie
Nov 3 '15 at 22:51
|
show 9 more comments
You should look for modern alternatives like tmux
.
tmux
is superior to screen
for many reasons, here are just some examples:
- Windows can be moved between session and even linked to multiple sessions
- Windows can be split horizontally and vertically into panes
- Support for UTF-8 and 256 colour terminals
- Sessions can be controlled from the shell without the need to enter a session
Basic Functionality
To get the same functionality as explained in the answer recommending screen
, you would need to do the following:
- ssh into the remote machine
- start
tmux
by typingtmux
into the shell - start the process you want inside the started
tmux
session - leave/detach the
tmux
session by typing Ctrl+b and then d
You can now safely log off from the remote machine, your process will keep running inside tmux
. When you come back again and want to check the status of your process you can use tmux attach
to attach to your tmux
session.
If you want to have multiple sessions running side-by-side, you should name each session using Ctrl+b and $
. You can get a list of the currently running sessions using tmux list-sessions
, now attach to a running session with command tmux attach-session -t 0
.
tmux
can do much more advanced things than handle a single window in a single session. For more information have a look in man tmux
or the tmux GitHub page. In particular, here's an FAQ about the main differences between screen
and tmux
.
You should look for modern alternatives like tmux
.
tmux
is superior to screen
for many reasons, here are just some examples:
- Windows can be moved between session and even linked to multiple sessions
- Windows can be split horizontally and vertically into panes
- Support for UTF-8 and 256 colour terminals
- Sessions can be controlled from the shell without the need to enter a session
Basic Functionality
To get the same functionality as explained in the answer recommending screen
, you would need to do the following:
- ssh into the remote machine
- start
tmux
by typingtmux
into the shell - start the process you want inside the started
tmux
session - leave/detach the
tmux
session by typing Ctrl+b and then d
You can now safely log off from the remote machine, your process will keep running inside tmux
. When you come back again and want to check the status of your process you can use tmux attach
to attach to your tmux
session.
If you want to have multiple sessions running side-by-side, you should name each session using Ctrl+b and $
. You can get a list of the currently running sessions using tmux list-sessions
, now attach to a running session with command tmux attach-session -t 0
.
tmux
can do much more advanced things than handle a single window in a single session. For more information have a look in man tmux
or the tmux GitHub page. In particular, here's an FAQ about the main differences between screen
and tmux
.
edited Sep 4 '18 at 9:34
ᴄʀᴏᴢᴇᴛ
1033
1033
answered Nov 23 '12 at 9:26
tongputongpu
7,4391912
7,4391912
3
@CraigM Usescreen -x -r [screenname]
orscreen -rx
for short if you have only one screen session active. This allows you to attach an existing screen instance.
– Lekensteyn
Nov 25 '12 at 10:31
4
This advice helped me with the same problem but I think it includes a typo. I am pretty sure that you need to typeCtrl-b
and thend
in order to leave/detach thetmux
session. Certainly that is the case for the version oftmux
on my Ubuntu 12.04.
– cxrodgers
Dec 25 '12 at 8:31
14
I made a mistake while following the above instructions. I will share it if anybody might fall into the same mistake: I started tmux in the shell of my own computer instead of the shell of the remote computer. One needs to start tmux in the shell of remote computer.
– Mert Nuhoglu
Aug 22 '14 at 14:53
3
Screen is now being developed again: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html Could you update your answer?
– muru
Nov 3 '14 at 3:27
4
Alternatively, runtmux detach
instead of typingctrl-b d
– Andrew MacFie
Nov 3 '15 at 22:51
|
show 9 more comments
3
@CraigM Usescreen -x -r [screenname]
orscreen -rx
for short if you have only one screen session active. This allows you to attach an existing screen instance.
– Lekensteyn
Nov 25 '12 at 10:31
4
This advice helped me with the same problem but I think it includes a typo. I am pretty sure that you need to typeCtrl-b
and thend
in order to leave/detach thetmux
session. Certainly that is the case for the version oftmux
on my Ubuntu 12.04.
– cxrodgers
Dec 25 '12 at 8:31
14
I made a mistake while following the above instructions. I will share it if anybody might fall into the same mistake: I started tmux in the shell of my own computer instead of the shell of the remote computer. One needs to start tmux in the shell of remote computer.
– Mert Nuhoglu
Aug 22 '14 at 14:53
3
Screen is now being developed again: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html Could you update your answer?
– muru
Nov 3 '14 at 3:27
4
Alternatively, runtmux detach
instead of typingctrl-b d
– Andrew MacFie
Nov 3 '15 at 22:51
3
3
@CraigM Use
screen -x -r [screenname]
or screen -rx
for short if you have only one screen session active. This allows you to attach an existing screen instance.– Lekensteyn
Nov 25 '12 at 10:31
@CraigM Use
screen -x -r [screenname]
or screen -rx
for short if you have only one screen session active. This allows you to attach an existing screen instance.– Lekensteyn
Nov 25 '12 at 10:31
4
4
This advice helped me with the same problem but I think it includes a typo. I am pretty sure that you need to type
Ctrl-b
and then d
in order to leave/detach the tmux
session. Certainly that is the case for the version of tmux
on my Ubuntu 12.04.– cxrodgers
Dec 25 '12 at 8:31
This advice helped me with the same problem but I think it includes a typo. I am pretty sure that you need to type
Ctrl-b
and then d
in order to leave/detach the tmux
session. Certainly that is the case for the version of tmux
on my Ubuntu 12.04.– cxrodgers
Dec 25 '12 at 8:31
14
14
I made a mistake while following the above instructions. I will share it if anybody might fall into the same mistake: I started tmux in the shell of my own computer instead of the shell of the remote computer. One needs to start tmux in the shell of remote computer.
– Mert Nuhoglu
Aug 22 '14 at 14:53
I made a mistake while following the above instructions. I will share it if anybody might fall into the same mistake: I started tmux in the shell of my own computer instead of the shell of the remote computer. One needs to start tmux in the shell of remote computer.
– Mert Nuhoglu
Aug 22 '14 at 14:53
3
3
Screen is now being developed again: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html Could you update your answer?
– muru
Nov 3 '14 at 3:27
Screen is now being developed again: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html Could you update your answer?
– muru
Nov 3 '14 at 3:27
4
4
Alternatively, run
tmux detach
instead of typing ctrl-b d
– Andrew MacFie
Nov 3 '15 at 22:51
Alternatively, run
tmux detach
instead of typing ctrl-b d
– Andrew MacFie
Nov 3 '15 at 22:51
|
show 9 more comments
Option 1: nohup
The best way is often the simplest.
nohup long-running-command &
It was made specifically for this, it even logs stdout to nohup.log
.
man nohup
Option 2: bg
If you want to "background" some already running tasks, then your best bet is to Ctrl+Z then run
bg
to put your most recent suspended task to background, allowing it to continue running.
Then a quick disown
should keep the process running after you log out.
screen
and others can do it, but that's not what they're for. I recommend nohup
for tasks you know your going to leave behind and bg
for tasks your already running and don't want to re-start.
Keep in mind, both are bash specific. If you're not using bash, then the commands could be different.
3
I would recommend to dodisown -h
– Michele
Aug 21 '17 at 16:45
interestingly screen and tmux doesn't work for miner, bur nohup works
– Yasin Okumuş
Nov 1 '17 at 19:04
1
bg
+disown
didn't work for me. I had a deployment script running I forgot to start inside tmux, and needed to leave early for a meeting. The script continuously outputs progress to the shell.ctrl+z
stopped the process, returning me to bash.bg
resumed the process, but it also resumed outputting the status to bash, making it impossible to see what I was typing. However, adisown
command produced "disown: current: no such job"
– BrianHVB
Sep 11 '18 at 23:42
this didn't work for me withjulia myFile.jl
for whatever reason. tmux does and is great.
– kilgoretrout
Oct 25 '18 at 5:11
This worked for me, thank you so much
– Chad
Mar 24 at 3:20
add a comment |
Option 1: nohup
The best way is often the simplest.
nohup long-running-command &
It was made specifically for this, it even logs stdout to nohup.log
.
man nohup
Option 2: bg
If you want to "background" some already running tasks, then your best bet is to Ctrl+Z then run
bg
to put your most recent suspended task to background, allowing it to continue running.
Then a quick disown
should keep the process running after you log out.
screen
and others can do it, but that's not what they're for. I recommend nohup
for tasks you know your going to leave behind and bg
for tasks your already running and don't want to re-start.
Keep in mind, both are bash specific. If you're not using bash, then the commands could be different.
3
I would recommend to dodisown -h
– Michele
Aug 21 '17 at 16:45
interestingly screen and tmux doesn't work for miner, bur nohup works
– Yasin Okumuş
Nov 1 '17 at 19:04
1
bg
+disown
didn't work for me. I had a deployment script running I forgot to start inside tmux, and needed to leave early for a meeting. The script continuously outputs progress to the shell.ctrl+z
stopped the process, returning me to bash.bg
resumed the process, but it also resumed outputting the status to bash, making it impossible to see what I was typing. However, adisown
command produced "disown: current: no such job"
– BrianHVB
Sep 11 '18 at 23:42
this didn't work for me withjulia myFile.jl
for whatever reason. tmux does and is great.
– kilgoretrout
Oct 25 '18 at 5:11
This worked for me, thank you so much
– Chad
Mar 24 at 3:20
add a comment |
Option 1: nohup
The best way is often the simplest.
nohup long-running-command &
It was made specifically for this, it even logs stdout to nohup.log
.
man nohup
Option 2: bg
If you want to "background" some already running tasks, then your best bet is to Ctrl+Z then run
bg
to put your most recent suspended task to background, allowing it to continue running.
Then a quick disown
should keep the process running after you log out.
screen
and others can do it, but that's not what they're for. I recommend nohup
for tasks you know your going to leave behind and bg
for tasks your already running and don't want to re-start.
Keep in mind, both are bash specific. If you're not using bash, then the commands could be different.
Option 1: nohup
The best way is often the simplest.
nohup long-running-command &
It was made specifically for this, it even logs stdout to nohup.log
.
man nohup
Option 2: bg
If you want to "background" some already running tasks, then your best bet is to Ctrl+Z then run
bg
to put your most recent suspended task to background, allowing it to continue running.
Then a quick disown
should keep the process running after you log out.
screen
and others can do it, but that's not what they're for. I recommend nohup
for tasks you know your going to leave behind and bg
for tasks your already running and don't want to re-start.
Keep in mind, both are bash specific. If you're not using bash, then the commands could be different.
edited Oct 29 '18 at 16:15
David Foerster
28.6k1367113
28.6k1367113
answered Nov 28 '12 at 2:58
coteyrcoteyr
12.8k52449
12.8k52449
3
I would recommend to dodisown -h
– Michele
Aug 21 '17 at 16:45
interestingly screen and tmux doesn't work for miner, bur nohup works
– Yasin Okumuş
Nov 1 '17 at 19:04
1
bg
+disown
didn't work for me. I had a deployment script running I forgot to start inside tmux, and needed to leave early for a meeting. The script continuously outputs progress to the shell.ctrl+z
stopped the process, returning me to bash.bg
resumed the process, but it also resumed outputting the status to bash, making it impossible to see what I was typing. However, adisown
command produced "disown: current: no such job"
– BrianHVB
Sep 11 '18 at 23:42
this didn't work for me withjulia myFile.jl
for whatever reason. tmux does and is great.
– kilgoretrout
Oct 25 '18 at 5:11
This worked for me, thank you so much
– Chad
Mar 24 at 3:20
add a comment |
3
I would recommend to dodisown -h
– Michele
Aug 21 '17 at 16:45
interestingly screen and tmux doesn't work for miner, bur nohup works
– Yasin Okumuş
Nov 1 '17 at 19:04
1
bg
+disown
didn't work for me. I had a deployment script running I forgot to start inside tmux, and needed to leave early for a meeting. The script continuously outputs progress to the shell.ctrl+z
stopped the process, returning me to bash.bg
resumed the process, but it also resumed outputting the status to bash, making it impossible to see what I was typing. However, adisown
command produced "disown: current: no such job"
– BrianHVB
Sep 11 '18 at 23:42
this didn't work for me withjulia myFile.jl
for whatever reason. tmux does and is great.
– kilgoretrout
Oct 25 '18 at 5:11
This worked for me, thank you so much
– Chad
Mar 24 at 3:20
3
3
I would recommend to do
disown -h
– Michele
Aug 21 '17 at 16:45
I would recommend to do
disown -h
– Michele
Aug 21 '17 at 16:45
interestingly screen and tmux doesn't work for miner, bur nohup works
– Yasin Okumuş
Nov 1 '17 at 19:04
interestingly screen and tmux doesn't work for miner, bur nohup works
– Yasin Okumuş
Nov 1 '17 at 19:04
1
1
bg
+ disown
didn't work for me. I had a deployment script running I forgot to start inside tmux, and needed to leave early for a meeting. The script continuously outputs progress to the shell. ctrl+z
stopped the process, returning me to bash. bg
resumed the process, but it also resumed outputting the status to bash, making it impossible to see what I was typing. However, a disown
command produced "disown: current: no such job"– BrianHVB
Sep 11 '18 at 23:42
bg
+ disown
didn't work for me. I had a deployment script running I forgot to start inside tmux, and needed to leave early for a meeting. The script continuously outputs progress to the shell. ctrl+z
stopped the process, returning me to bash. bg
resumed the process, but it also resumed outputting the status to bash, making it impossible to see what I was typing. However, a disown
command produced "disown: current: no such job"– BrianHVB
Sep 11 '18 at 23:42
this didn't work for me with
julia myFile.jl
for whatever reason. tmux does and is great.– kilgoretrout
Oct 25 '18 at 5:11
this didn't work for me with
julia myFile.jl
for whatever reason. tmux does and is great.– kilgoretrout
Oct 25 '18 at 5:11
This worked for me, thank you so much
– Chad
Mar 24 at 3:20
This worked for me, thank you so much
– Chad
Mar 24 at 3:20
add a comment |
You could do that by using screen
.
Type man screen
to find out more or read this screen man page.
Simple scenario:
ssh into your remote box. Type
screen
Then start the process you want.Press Ctrl-A then Ctrl-D. This will "detach" your screen session but leave your processes running. You can now log out of the remote box.
If you want to come back later, log on again and type
screen -r
This will "resume" your screen session, and you can see the output of your process.
32
I will usually name my screen sessions usingscreen -S name
to make it easier to connect to the correct one later.
– David Oneill
Nov 24 '12 at 22:37
The link is down
– Gab是好人
Sep 16 '16 at 13:50
1
Personally, I'm working on a box without any package control software. After spending about half an hour building dependencies for TMUX (which I personally have experience with and like) from source, it became clear that screen was the better and simpler solution for me. TL;DR: the optimal solution to this problem depends on the use case, the machine, and how much time you have to get set up. Thanks for this answer :)
– Max von Hippel
Nov 1 '17 at 3:30
Combination withscreen -S
before leave andscreen -r
when coming back is amazing!
– Meloman
Mar 14 '18 at 10:03
Thanks for this. This solution worked for me while tmux did not (I use a version of bash for windows while ssh'ing into a linux machine)
– Michael Sorensen
May 13 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
You could do that by using screen
.
Type man screen
to find out more or read this screen man page.
Simple scenario:
ssh into your remote box. Type
screen
Then start the process you want.Press Ctrl-A then Ctrl-D. This will "detach" your screen session but leave your processes running. You can now log out of the remote box.
If you want to come back later, log on again and type
screen -r
This will "resume" your screen session, and you can see the output of your process.
32
I will usually name my screen sessions usingscreen -S name
to make it easier to connect to the correct one later.
– David Oneill
Nov 24 '12 at 22:37
The link is down
– Gab是好人
Sep 16 '16 at 13:50
1
Personally, I'm working on a box without any package control software. After spending about half an hour building dependencies for TMUX (which I personally have experience with and like) from source, it became clear that screen was the better and simpler solution for me. TL;DR: the optimal solution to this problem depends on the use case, the machine, and how much time you have to get set up. Thanks for this answer :)
– Max von Hippel
Nov 1 '17 at 3:30
Combination withscreen -S
before leave andscreen -r
when coming back is amazing!
– Meloman
Mar 14 '18 at 10:03
Thanks for this. This solution worked for me while tmux did not (I use a version of bash for windows while ssh'ing into a linux machine)
– Michael Sorensen
May 13 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
You could do that by using screen
.
Type man screen
to find out more or read this screen man page.
Simple scenario:
ssh into your remote box. Type
screen
Then start the process you want.Press Ctrl-A then Ctrl-D. This will "detach" your screen session but leave your processes running. You can now log out of the remote box.
If you want to come back later, log on again and type
screen -r
This will "resume" your screen session, and you can see the output of your process.
You could do that by using screen
.
Type man screen
to find out more or read this screen man page.
Simple scenario:
ssh into your remote box. Type
screen
Then start the process you want.Press Ctrl-A then Ctrl-D. This will "detach" your screen session but leave your processes running. You can now log out of the remote box.
If you want to come back later, log on again and type
screen -r
This will "resume" your screen session, and you can see the output of your process.
edited Jun 22 '17 at 4:19
heemayl
68.2k11144215
68.2k11144215
answered Oct 21 '10 at 12:20
LincolnLincoln
2,49811213
2,49811213
32
I will usually name my screen sessions usingscreen -S name
to make it easier to connect to the correct one later.
– David Oneill
Nov 24 '12 at 22:37
The link is down
– Gab是好人
Sep 16 '16 at 13:50
1
Personally, I'm working on a box without any package control software. After spending about half an hour building dependencies for TMUX (which I personally have experience with and like) from source, it became clear that screen was the better and simpler solution for me. TL;DR: the optimal solution to this problem depends on the use case, the machine, and how much time you have to get set up. Thanks for this answer :)
– Max von Hippel
Nov 1 '17 at 3:30
Combination withscreen -S
before leave andscreen -r
when coming back is amazing!
– Meloman
Mar 14 '18 at 10:03
Thanks for this. This solution worked for me while tmux did not (I use a version of bash for windows while ssh'ing into a linux machine)
– Michael Sorensen
May 13 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
32
I will usually name my screen sessions usingscreen -S name
to make it easier to connect to the correct one later.
– David Oneill
Nov 24 '12 at 22:37
The link is down
– Gab是好人
Sep 16 '16 at 13:50
1
Personally, I'm working on a box without any package control software. After spending about half an hour building dependencies for TMUX (which I personally have experience with and like) from source, it became clear that screen was the better and simpler solution for me. TL;DR: the optimal solution to this problem depends on the use case, the machine, and how much time you have to get set up. Thanks for this answer :)
– Max von Hippel
Nov 1 '17 at 3:30
Combination withscreen -S
before leave andscreen -r
when coming back is amazing!
– Meloman
Mar 14 '18 at 10:03
Thanks for this. This solution worked for me while tmux did not (I use a version of bash for windows while ssh'ing into a linux machine)
– Michael Sorensen
May 13 '18 at 19:53
32
32
I will usually name my screen sessions using
screen -S name
to make it easier to connect to the correct one later.– David Oneill
Nov 24 '12 at 22:37
I will usually name my screen sessions using
screen -S name
to make it easier to connect to the correct one later.– David Oneill
Nov 24 '12 at 22:37
The link is down
– Gab是好人
Sep 16 '16 at 13:50
The link is down
– Gab是好人
Sep 16 '16 at 13:50
1
1
Personally, I'm working on a box without any package control software. After spending about half an hour building dependencies for TMUX (which I personally have experience with and like) from source, it became clear that screen was the better and simpler solution for me. TL;DR: the optimal solution to this problem depends on the use case, the machine, and how much time you have to get set up. Thanks for this answer :)
– Max von Hippel
Nov 1 '17 at 3:30
Personally, I'm working on a box without any package control software. After spending about half an hour building dependencies for TMUX (which I personally have experience with and like) from source, it became clear that screen was the better and simpler solution for me. TL;DR: the optimal solution to this problem depends on the use case, the machine, and how much time you have to get set up. Thanks for this answer :)
– Max von Hippel
Nov 1 '17 at 3:30
Combination with
screen -S
before leave and screen -r
when coming back is amazing!– Meloman
Mar 14 '18 at 10:03
Combination with
screen -S
before leave and screen -r
when coming back is amazing!– Meloman
Mar 14 '18 at 10:03
Thanks for this. This solution worked for me while tmux did not (I use a version of bash for windows while ssh'ing into a linux machine)
– Michael Sorensen
May 13 '18 at 19:53
Thanks for this. This solution worked for me while tmux did not (I use a version of bash for windows while ssh'ing into a linux machine)
– Michael Sorensen
May 13 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
Screen and nohup is the better way, but if you have to detach a process already running without screen or nohup you can run disown command.
disown [-ar] [-h] [
jobspec
… |
pid
… ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active jobs. If the
-h
option is given, the job is not removed from the table, but is marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell receives a SIGHUP. If jobspec is not present, and neither the-a
nor the-r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If no jobspec is supplied, the-a
option means to remove or mark all jobs; the-r
option without a jobspec argument restricts operation to running jobs.
With disown you can close the terminal and get the process running on the machine.
10
This is also my favourite way to do it. I frequently usedisown -a && exit
– Stefano Palazzo♦
Oct 21 '10 at 17:45
1
Perfect. This is a lovely command and deserves all the upvotes!
– Greg
Apr 29 '14 at 10:38
8
one word of caution, I stopped a running process with Ctrl-Z and didn't start it in the background before callingdisown
and it killed it.
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:07
3
May crash if it wants to write to the terminal. Redirecting output of a running process isn't as easy. Better to start it properly with nohup.
– jiggunjer
Aug 25 '16 at 12:42
1
This is a good answer, because it directly answers the question. The author of the question asked what to do after having already executed a bunch of long running commands. Most of these answers let you know what to do before you execute the commands.
– q0rban
Aug 17 '17 at 0:24
add a comment |
Screen and nohup is the better way, but if you have to detach a process already running without screen or nohup you can run disown command.
disown [-ar] [-h] [
jobspec
… |
pid
… ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active jobs. If the
-h
option is given, the job is not removed from the table, but is marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell receives a SIGHUP. If jobspec is not present, and neither the-a
nor the-r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If no jobspec is supplied, the-a
option means to remove or mark all jobs; the-r
option without a jobspec argument restricts operation to running jobs.
With disown you can close the terminal and get the process running on the machine.
10
This is also my favourite way to do it. I frequently usedisown -a && exit
– Stefano Palazzo♦
Oct 21 '10 at 17:45
1
Perfect. This is a lovely command and deserves all the upvotes!
– Greg
Apr 29 '14 at 10:38
8
one word of caution, I stopped a running process with Ctrl-Z and didn't start it in the background before callingdisown
and it killed it.
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:07
3
May crash if it wants to write to the terminal. Redirecting output of a running process isn't as easy. Better to start it properly with nohup.
– jiggunjer
Aug 25 '16 at 12:42
1
This is a good answer, because it directly answers the question. The author of the question asked what to do after having already executed a bunch of long running commands. Most of these answers let you know what to do before you execute the commands.
– q0rban
Aug 17 '17 at 0:24
add a comment |
Screen and nohup is the better way, but if you have to detach a process already running without screen or nohup you can run disown command.
disown [-ar] [-h] [
jobspec
… |
pid
… ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active jobs. If the
-h
option is given, the job is not removed from the table, but is marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell receives a SIGHUP. If jobspec is not present, and neither the-a
nor the-r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If no jobspec is supplied, the-a
option means to remove or mark all jobs; the-r
option without a jobspec argument restricts operation to running jobs.
With disown you can close the terminal and get the process running on the machine.
Screen and nohup is the better way, but if you have to detach a process already running without screen or nohup you can run disown command.
disown [-ar] [-h] [
jobspec
… |
pid
… ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active jobs. If the
-h
option is given, the job is not removed from the table, but is marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell receives a SIGHUP. If jobspec is not present, and neither the-a
nor the-r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If no jobspec is supplied, the-a
option means to remove or mark all jobs; the-r
option without a jobspec argument restricts operation to running jobs.
With disown you can close the terminal and get the process running on the machine.
edited Sep 20 '17 at 16:02
Nick T
1,71721327
1,71721327
answered Oct 21 '10 at 13:19
bassgeybassgey
82152
82152
10
This is also my favourite way to do it. I frequently usedisown -a && exit
– Stefano Palazzo♦
Oct 21 '10 at 17:45
1
Perfect. This is a lovely command and deserves all the upvotes!
– Greg
Apr 29 '14 at 10:38
8
one word of caution, I stopped a running process with Ctrl-Z and didn't start it in the background before callingdisown
and it killed it.
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:07
3
May crash if it wants to write to the terminal. Redirecting output of a running process isn't as easy. Better to start it properly with nohup.
– jiggunjer
Aug 25 '16 at 12:42
1
This is a good answer, because it directly answers the question. The author of the question asked what to do after having already executed a bunch of long running commands. Most of these answers let you know what to do before you execute the commands.
– q0rban
Aug 17 '17 at 0:24
add a comment |
10
This is also my favourite way to do it. I frequently usedisown -a && exit
– Stefano Palazzo♦
Oct 21 '10 at 17:45
1
Perfect. This is a lovely command and deserves all the upvotes!
– Greg
Apr 29 '14 at 10:38
8
one word of caution, I stopped a running process with Ctrl-Z and didn't start it in the background before callingdisown
and it killed it.
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:07
3
May crash if it wants to write to the terminal. Redirecting output of a running process isn't as easy. Better to start it properly with nohup.
– jiggunjer
Aug 25 '16 at 12:42
1
This is a good answer, because it directly answers the question. The author of the question asked what to do after having already executed a bunch of long running commands. Most of these answers let you know what to do before you execute the commands.
– q0rban
Aug 17 '17 at 0:24
10
10
This is also my favourite way to do it. I frequently use
disown -a && exit
– Stefano Palazzo♦
Oct 21 '10 at 17:45
This is also my favourite way to do it. I frequently use
disown -a && exit
– Stefano Palazzo♦
Oct 21 '10 at 17:45
1
1
Perfect. This is a lovely command and deserves all the upvotes!
– Greg
Apr 29 '14 at 10:38
Perfect. This is a lovely command and deserves all the upvotes!
– Greg
Apr 29 '14 at 10:38
8
8
one word of caution, I stopped a running process with Ctrl-Z and didn't start it in the background before calling
disown
and it killed it.– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:07
one word of caution, I stopped a running process with Ctrl-Z and didn't start it in the background before calling
disown
and it killed it.– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:07
3
3
May crash if it wants to write to the terminal. Redirecting output of a running process isn't as easy. Better to start it properly with nohup.
– jiggunjer
Aug 25 '16 at 12:42
May crash if it wants to write to the terminal. Redirecting output of a running process isn't as easy. Better to start it properly with nohup.
– jiggunjer
Aug 25 '16 at 12:42
1
1
This is a good answer, because it directly answers the question. The author of the question asked what to do after having already executed a bunch of long running commands. Most of these answers let you know what to do before you execute the commands.
– q0rban
Aug 17 '17 at 0:24
This is a good answer, because it directly answers the question. The author of the question asked what to do after having already executed a bunch of long running commands. Most of these answers let you know what to do before you execute the commands.
– q0rban
Aug 17 '17 at 0:24
add a comment |
I was stuck in a large mv so I wasn't in a position to stop the process, setup screen and then start it again. I managed to exit the ssh session with the process running by essentially doing the following steps:
- ssh [server]
- command
Ctrl+Z- bg
- disown [process pid optional, defaults to last]
- exit
Step 3 pauses the current process (e.g. my 'mv' command).
Step 4 puts the paused process in to the background and resumes it.
Step 5 lets you disown the process.** To get a list of jobs simply type jobs
before.
** Regarding disown (from bash manual):
disown [-ar] [-h] [jobspec ... | pid ... ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active
jobs. If jobspec is not present, and neither the -a nor the -r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If the -h option
is given, each jobspec is not removed from the table, but is
marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell
receives a SIGHUP. If no jobspec is supplied, the -a option
means to remove or mark all jobs; the -r option without a job‐
spec argument restricts operation to running jobs. The return
value is 0 unless a jobspec does not specify a valid job.
2
Built-in's are always my first choice :) THX
– ken_oy
Apr 2 '18 at 13:30
This answer should be marked as right. To install and getting used to screen for solving this problem is exaggerated.
– Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter
Apr 5 '18 at 11:41
This is very helpful when you have already started any command and which is being running for long. Terminating and starting it in a TMUX Session will take time
– Deepali Mittal
May 14 '18 at 10:54
1
@tom-brossman: Please watch out for unnecessary edits like this one! If invoked without job specification thedisown
built-in command acts on the most recent background job.
– David Foerster
Oct 29 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
I was stuck in a large mv so I wasn't in a position to stop the process, setup screen and then start it again. I managed to exit the ssh session with the process running by essentially doing the following steps:
- ssh [server]
- command
Ctrl+Z- bg
- disown [process pid optional, defaults to last]
- exit
Step 3 pauses the current process (e.g. my 'mv' command).
Step 4 puts the paused process in to the background and resumes it.
Step 5 lets you disown the process.** To get a list of jobs simply type jobs
before.
** Regarding disown (from bash manual):
disown [-ar] [-h] [jobspec ... | pid ... ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active
jobs. If jobspec is not present, and neither the -a nor the -r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If the -h option
is given, each jobspec is not removed from the table, but is
marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell
receives a SIGHUP. If no jobspec is supplied, the -a option
means to remove or mark all jobs; the -r option without a job‐
spec argument restricts operation to running jobs. The return
value is 0 unless a jobspec does not specify a valid job.
2
Built-in's are always my first choice :) THX
– ken_oy
Apr 2 '18 at 13:30
This answer should be marked as right. To install and getting used to screen for solving this problem is exaggerated.
– Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter
Apr 5 '18 at 11:41
This is very helpful when you have already started any command and which is being running for long. Terminating and starting it in a TMUX Session will take time
– Deepali Mittal
May 14 '18 at 10:54
1
@tom-brossman: Please watch out for unnecessary edits like this one! If invoked without job specification thedisown
built-in command acts on the most recent background job.
– David Foerster
Oct 29 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
I was stuck in a large mv so I wasn't in a position to stop the process, setup screen and then start it again. I managed to exit the ssh session with the process running by essentially doing the following steps:
- ssh [server]
- command
Ctrl+Z- bg
- disown [process pid optional, defaults to last]
- exit
Step 3 pauses the current process (e.g. my 'mv' command).
Step 4 puts the paused process in to the background and resumes it.
Step 5 lets you disown the process.** To get a list of jobs simply type jobs
before.
** Regarding disown (from bash manual):
disown [-ar] [-h] [jobspec ... | pid ... ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active
jobs. If jobspec is not present, and neither the -a nor the -r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If the -h option
is given, each jobspec is not removed from the table, but is
marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell
receives a SIGHUP. If no jobspec is supplied, the -a option
means to remove or mark all jobs; the -r option without a job‐
spec argument restricts operation to running jobs. The return
value is 0 unless a jobspec does not specify a valid job.
I was stuck in a large mv so I wasn't in a position to stop the process, setup screen and then start it again. I managed to exit the ssh session with the process running by essentially doing the following steps:
- ssh [server]
- command
Ctrl+Z- bg
- disown [process pid optional, defaults to last]
- exit
Step 3 pauses the current process (e.g. my 'mv' command).
Step 4 puts the paused process in to the background and resumes it.
Step 5 lets you disown the process.** To get a list of jobs simply type jobs
before.
** Regarding disown (from bash manual):
disown [-ar] [-h] [jobspec ... | pid ... ]
Without options, remove each jobspec from the table of active
jobs. If jobspec is not present, and neither the -a nor the -r
option is supplied, the current job is used. If the -h option
is given, each jobspec is not removed from the table, but is
marked so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell
receives a SIGHUP. If no jobspec is supplied, the -a option
means to remove or mark all jobs; the -r option without a job‐
spec argument restricts operation to running jobs. The return
value is 0 unless a jobspec does not specify a valid job.
edited Apr 10 at 18:50
answered Nov 25 '13 at 3:30
ChaosChaos
7501710
7501710
2
Built-in's are always my first choice :) THX
– ken_oy
Apr 2 '18 at 13:30
This answer should be marked as right. To install and getting used to screen for solving this problem is exaggerated.
– Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter
Apr 5 '18 at 11:41
This is very helpful when you have already started any command and which is being running for long. Terminating and starting it in a TMUX Session will take time
– Deepali Mittal
May 14 '18 at 10:54
1
@tom-brossman: Please watch out for unnecessary edits like this one! If invoked without job specification thedisown
built-in command acts on the most recent background job.
– David Foerster
Oct 29 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
2
Built-in's are always my first choice :) THX
– ken_oy
Apr 2 '18 at 13:30
This answer should be marked as right. To install and getting used to screen for solving this problem is exaggerated.
– Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter
Apr 5 '18 at 11:41
This is very helpful when you have already started any command and which is being running for long. Terminating and starting it in a TMUX Session will take time
– Deepali Mittal
May 14 '18 at 10:54
1
@tom-brossman: Please watch out for unnecessary edits like this one! If invoked without job specification thedisown
built-in command acts on the most recent background job.
– David Foerster
Oct 29 '18 at 16:13
2
2
Built-in's are always my first choice :) THX
– ken_oy
Apr 2 '18 at 13:30
Built-in's are always my first choice :) THX
– ken_oy
Apr 2 '18 at 13:30
This answer should be marked as right. To install and getting used to screen for solving this problem is exaggerated.
– Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter
Apr 5 '18 at 11:41
This answer should be marked as right. To install and getting used to screen for solving this problem is exaggerated.
– Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter
Apr 5 '18 at 11:41
This is very helpful when you have already started any command and which is being running for long. Terminating and starting it in a TMUX Session will take time
– Deepali Mittal
May 14 '18 at 10:54
This is very helpful when you have already started any command and which is being running for long. Terminating and starting it in a TMUX Session will take time
– Deepali Mittal
May 14 '18 at 10:54
1
1
@tom-brossman: Please watch out for unnecessary edits like this one! If invoked without job specification the
disown
built-in command acts on the most recent background job.– David Foerster
Oct 29 '18 at 16:13
@tom-brossman: Please watch out for unnecessary edits like this one! If invoked without job specification the
disown
built-in command acts on the most recent background job.– David Foerster
Oct 29 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
There are two major programs you can use to maintain programs and terminal state over multiple ssh connections. They are screen (the incumbent, but unfortunately unmaintained. Apparently being actively developed now) and tmux (newer, actively maintained). Byobu is a front end that can run on top of their of these systems and offer additional ubuntu status information. On new installations it will use tmux as a backend, if you have an older installation of byobu and an existing config it will maintain the previous backend, be it screen or tmux.
Byobu
Byobu can be installed on the computer by doing so in a Debian-based machine:
sudo aptitude install byobu
Using yum, you do
su -c 'yum install byobu'
It's also possible to install byobu on other distributions.
Using byobu
You can start byobu by running byobu
on the host machine after connecting using ssh.
This will give you a shell that looks like this:
You can also use Byobu Terminal on a Ubuntu machine with -X option and easily have a perfectly working byobu.
Usage:
Start byobu by typing byobu
.
You can press F2 to create a new window within the current session, F3-F4 to switch between the various windows.
The best part about byobu is, you dont have to actually kill the processes running in the terminal to leave the terminal. You can simply send screen/tmux (the skeleton of byobu) to background and resume the next time you come:
- To leave byobu and keeep it running (detach) press F6.
The next time you come, just do
byobu
and you sholud be back right where you were.
You can also create various byobu sessions by byobu -S session1
and so on. And you can connect to either of them when you come back.
You can do much more using Byobu. Use it!
Some definitive guides are here, or here.
I tried using byobu from a PuTTY-based session to my Ubuntu box, but I get the status line repeated and scrolling on the display. Although it detached properly wen pressing F6, it was not a useable solution in my setup.
– jfmessier
Nov 6 '13 at 17:47
1
@jfmessier It's because PuTTY doesn't take ncurses (utf-8 basically) well. It's possible to eliminate this problem by following this thread - stackoverflow.com/questions/10731099/…
– SiddharthaRT
Nov 7 '13 at 10:40
This is awesome! 1. it gives me a colored bash prompt that I cannot seem to enable with bash as my default shell and 2. I get to run 2 bots at the same time and still have another terminal to do work on! @SiddharthaRT you deserve an upvote sir!
– Dev
Jul 22 '16 at 6:53
add a comment |
There are two major programs you can use to maintain programs and terminal state over multiple ssh connections. They are screen (the incumbent, but unfortunately unmaintained. Apparently being actively developed now) and tmux (newer, actively maintained). Byobu is a front end that can run on top of their of these systems and offer additional ubuntu status information. On new installations it will use tmux as a backend, if you have an older installation of byobu and an existing config it will maintain the previous backend, be it screen or tmux.
Byobu
Byobu can be installed on the computer by doing so in a Debian-based machine:
sudo aptitude install byobu
Using yum, you do
su -c 'yum install byobu'
It's also possible to install byobu on other distributions.
Using byobu
You can start byobu by running byobu
on the host machine after connecting using ssh.
This will give you a shell that looks like this:
You can also use Byobu Terminal on a Ubuntu machine with -X option and easily have a perfectly working byobu.
Usage:
Start byobu by typing byobu
.
You can press F2 to create a new window within the current session, F3-F4 to switch between the various windows.
The best part about byobu is, you dont have to actually kill the processes running in the terminal to leave the terminal. You can simply send screen/tmux (the skeleton of byobu) to background and resume the next time you come:
- To leave byobu and keeep it running (detach) press F6.
The next time you come, just do
byobu
and you sholud be back right where you were.
You can also create various byobu sessions by byobu -S session1
and so on. And you can connect to either of them when you come back.
You can do much more using Byobu. Use it!
Some definitive guides are here, or here.
I tried using byobu from a PuTTY-based session to my Ubuntu box, but I get the status line repeated and scrolling on the display. Although it detached properly wen pressing F6, it was not a useable solution in my setup.
– jfmessier
Nov 6 '13 at 17:47
1
@jfmessier It's because PuTTY doesn't take ncurses (utf-8 basically) well. It's possible to eliminate this problem by following this thread - stackoverflow.com/questions/10731099/…
– SiddharthaRT
Nov 7 '13 at 10:40
This is awesome! 1. it gives me a colored bash prompt that I cannot seem to enable with bash as my default shell and 2. I get to run 2 bots at the same time and still have another terminal to do work on! @SiddharthaRT you deserve an upvote sir!
– Dev
Jul 22 '16 at 6:53
add a comment |
There are two major programs you can use to maintain programs and terminal state over multiple ssh connections. They are screen (the incumbent, but unfortunately unmaintained. Apparently being actively developed now) and tmux (newer, actively maintained). Byobu is a front end that can run on top of their of these systems and offer additional ubuntu status information. On new installations it will use tmux as a backend, if you have an older installation of byobu and an existing config it will maintain the previous backend, be it screen or tmux.
Byobu
Byobu can be installed on the computer by doing so in a Debian-based machine:
sudo aptitude install byobu
Using yum, you do
su -c 'yum install byobu'
It's also possible to install byobu on other distributions.
Using byobu
You can start byobu by running byobu
on the host machine after connecting using ssh.
This will give you a shell that looks like this:
You can also use Byobu Terminal on a Ubuntu machine with -X option and easily have a perfectly working byobu.
Usage:
Start byobu by typing byobu
.
You can press F2 to create a new window within the current session, F3-F4 to switch between the various windows.
The best part about byobu is, you dont have to actually kill the processes running in the terminal to leave the terminal. You can simply send screen/tmux (the skeleton of byobu) to background and resume the next time you come:
- To leave byobu and keeep it running (detach) press F6.
The next time you come, just do
byobu
and you sholud be back right where you were.
You can also create various byobu sessions by byobu -S session1
and so on. And you can connect to either of them when you come back.
You can do much more using Byobu. Use it!
Some definitive guides are here, or here.
There are two major programs you can use to maintain programs and terminal state over multiple ssh connections. They are screen (the incumbent, but unfortunately unmaintained. Apparently being actively developed now) and tmux (newer, actively maintained). Byobu is a front end that can run on top of their of these systems and offer additional ubuntu status information. On new installations it will use tmux as a backend, if you have an older installation of byobu and an existing config it will maintain the previous backend, be it screen or tmux.
Byobu
Byobu can be installed on the computer by doing so in a Debian-based machine:
sudo aptitude install byobu
Using yum, you do
su -c 'yum install byobu'
It's also possible to install byobu on other distributions.
Using byobu
You can start byobu by running byobu
on the host machine after connecting using ssh.
This will give you a shell that looks like this:
You can also use Byobu Terminal on a Ubuntu machine with -X option and easily have a perfectly working byobu.
Usage:
Start byobu by typing byobu
.
You can press F2 to create a new window within the current session, F3-F4 to switch between the various windows.
The best part about byobu is, you dont have to actually kill the processes running in the terminal to leave the terminal. You can simply send screen/tmux (the skeleton of byobu) to background and resume the next time you come:
- To leave byobu and keeep it running (detach) press F6.
The next time you come, just do
byobu
and you sholud be back right where you were.
You can also create various byobu sessions by byobu -S session1
and so on. And you can connect to either of them when you come back.
You can do much more using Byobu. Use it!
Some definitive guides are here, or here.
edited Apr 5 at 8:10
user8261637
32
32
answered Nov 24 '12 at 22:09
SiddharthaRTSiddharthaRT
4,99611117
4,99611117
I tried using byobu from a PuTTY-based session to my Ubuntu box, but I get the status line repeated and scrolling on the display. Although it detached properly wen pressing F6, it was not a useable solution in my setup.
– jfmessier
Nov 6 '13 at 17:47
1
@jfmessier It's because PuTTY doesn't take ncurses (utf-8 basically) well. It's possible to eliminate this problem by following this thread - stackoverflow.com/questions/10731099/…
– SiddharthaRT
Nov 7 '13 at 10:40
This is awesome! 1. it gives me a colored bash prompt that I cannot seem to enable with bash as my default shell and 2. I get to run 2 bots at the same time and still have another terminal to do work on! @SiddharthaRT you deserve an upvote sir!
– Dev
Jul 22 '16 at 6:53
add a comment |
I tried using byobu from a PuTTY-based session to my Ubuntu box, but I get the status line repeated and scrolling on the display. Although it detached properly wen pressing F6, it was not a useable solution in my setup.
– jfmessier
Nov 6 '13 at 17:47
1
@jfmessier It's because PuTTY doesn't take ncurses (utf-8 basically) well. It's possible to eliminate this problem by following this thread - stackoverflow.com/questions/10731099/…
– SiddharthaRT
Nov 7 '13 at 10:40
This is awesome! 1. it gives me a colored bash prompt that I cannot seem to enable with bash as my default shell and 2. I get to run 2 bots at the same time and still have another terminal to do work on! @SiddharthaRT you deserve an upvote sir!
– Dev
Jul 22 '16 at 6:53
I tried using byobu from a PuTTY-based session to my Ubuntu box, but I get the status line repeated and scrolling on the display. Although it detached properly wen pressing F6, it was not a useable solution in my setup.
– jfmessier
Nov 6 '13 at 17:47
I tried using byobu from a PuTTY-based session to my Ubuntu box, but I get the status line repeated and scrolling on the display. Although it detached properly wen pressing F6, it was not a useable solution in my setup.
– jfmessier
Nov 6 '13 at 17:47
1
1
@jfmessier It's because PuTTY doesn't take ncurses (utf-8 basically) well. It's possible to eliminate this problem by following this thread - stackoverflow.com/questions/10731099/…
– SiddharthaRT
Nov 7 '13 at 10:40
@jfmessier It's because PuTTY doesn't take ncurses (utf-8 basically) well. It's possible to eliminate this problem by following this thread - stackoverflow.com/questions/10731099/…
– SiddharthaRT
Nov 7 '13 at 10:40
This is awesome! 1. it gives me a colored bash prompt that I cannot seem to enable with bash as my default shell and 2. I get to run 2 bots at the same time and still have another terminal to do work on! @SiddharthaRT you deserve an upvote sir!
– Dev
Jul 22 '16 at 6:53
This is awesome! 1. it gives me a colored bash prompt that I cannot seem to enable with bash as my default shell and 2. I get to run 2 bots at the same time and still have another terminal to do work on! @SiddharthaRT you deserve an upvote sir!
– Dev
Jul 22 '16 at 6:53
add a comment |
You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job.
You can use nohup but modern wisdom suggests you use screen or byobu as your login so you can detach and leave things running.
Screen has the advantage that you can detach from one machine and reattach from another which is handy if you want to check on long running processes that run beyond the end of the working day.
There is a reasonable getting started guide to screen here.
byobu puts an easy to use interface on top of screen with menus etc. It's also the current implementation of screen on newer ubuntu. F2 to start a new terminal F3/F4 to toggle back and forth and F6 to disconnect. Type exit to actually end terminals permanently.
byobu uses tmux these days..
– scottl
Nov 28 '12 at 7:04
12
"You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job." -- no, you can usedisown
to achieve this. See @bassgey's answer
– Rich
May 23 '13 at 16:11
after struggling to learn screen and tmux....byobu brought tears to my eyes
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:06
disown
and if needed justCtrl-z
, thenbg
to get it of the active terminal and to the background. Then,disown
.
– mimoralea
Nov 21 '17 at 20:49
add a comment |
You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job.
You can use nohup but modern wisdom suggests you use screen or byobu as your login so you can detach and leave things running.
Screen has the advantage that you can detach from one machine and reattach from another which is handy if you want to check on long running processes that run beyond the end of the working day.
There is a reasonable getting started guide to screen here.
byobu puts an easy to use interface on top of screen with menus etc. It's also the current implementation of screen on newer ubuntu. F2 to start a new terminal F3/F4 to toggle back and forth and F6 to disconnect. Type exit to actually end terminals permanently.
byobu uses tmux these days..
– scottl
Nov 28 '12 at 7:04
12
"You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job." -- no, you can usedisown
to achieve this. See @bassgey's answer
– Rich
May 23 '13 at 16:11
after struggling to learn screen and tmux....byobu brought tears to my eyes
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:06
disown
and if needed justCtrl-z
, thenbg
to get it of the active terminal and to the background. Then,disown
.
– mimoralea
Nov 21 '17 at 20:49
add a comment |
You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job.
You can use nohup but modern wisdom suggests you use screen or byobu as your login so you can detach and leave things running.
Screen has the advantage that you can detach from one machine and reattach from another which is handy if you want to check on long running processes that run beyond the end of the working day.
There is a reasonable getting started guide to screen here.
byobu puts an easy to use interface on top of screen with menus etc. It's also the current implementation of screen on newer ubuntu. F2 to start a new terminal F3/F4 to toggle back and forth and F6 to disconnect. Type exit to actually end terminals permanently.
You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job.
You can use nohup but modern wisdom suggests you use screen or byobu as your login so you can detach and leave things running.
Screen has the advantage that you can detach from one machine and reattach from another which is handy if you want to check on long running processes that run beyond the end of the working day.
There is a reasonable getting started guide to screen here.
byobu puts an easy to use interface on top of screen with menus etc. It's also the current implementation of screen on newer ubuntu. F2 to start a new terminal F3/F4 to toggle back and forth and F6 to disconnect. Type exit to actually end terminals permanently.
edited Mar 23 '12 at 7:07
wildintellect
21316
21316
answered Oct 21 '10 at 12:16
Richard HollowayRichard Holloway
21.1k54252
21.1k54252
byobu uses tmux these days..
– scottl
Nov 28 '12 at 7:04
12
"You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job." -- no, you can usedisown
to achieve this. See @bassgey's answer
– Rich
May 23 '13 at 16:11
after struggling to learn screen and tmux....byobu brought tears to my eyes
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:06
disown
and if needed justCtrl-z
, thenbg
to get it of the active terminal and to the background. Then,disown
.
– mimoralea
Nov 21 '17 at 20:49
add a comment |
byobu uses tmux these days..
– scottl
Nov 28 '12 at 7:04
12
"You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job." -- no, you can usedisown
to achieve this. See @bassgey's answer
– Rich
May 23 '13 at 16:11
after struggling to learn screen and tmux....byobu brought tears to my eyes
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:06
disown
and if needed justCtrl-z
, thenbg
to get it of the active terminal and to the background. Then,disown
.
– mimoralea
Nov 21 '17 at 20:49
byobu uses tmux these days..
– scottl
Nov 28 '12 at 7:04
byobu uses tmux these days..
– scottl
Nov 28 '12 at 7:04
12
12
"You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job." -- no, you can use
disown
to achieve this. See @bassgey's answer– Rich
May 23 '13 at 16:11
"You cannot do this once the process has started, you need to have set things up before you run a long running job." -- no, you can use
disown
to achieve this. See @bassgey's answer– Rich
May 23 '13 at 16:11
after struggling to learn screen and tmux....byobu brought tears to my eyes
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:06
after struggling to learn screen and tmux....byobu brought tears to my eyes
– HDave
Sep 23 '14 at 21:06
disown
and if needed just Ctrl-z
, then bg
to get it of the active terminal and to the background. Then, disown
.– mimoralea
Nov 21 '17 at 20:49
disown
and if needed just Ctrl-z
, then bg
to get it of the active terminal and to the background. Then, disown
.– mimoralea
Nov 21 '17 at 20:49
add a comment |
Hey, while I agreed that screen is the most efective option.
You can use vncserver and then start the process on it.
Also if your only interes is to have the process running and no need to take control back of it, and utterly most important you were not aware you will need to close the session and you have the process already running, you are not of luck if you used bash as the shell
First you need to send the process to background by typing Ctrl+Z followed by bg %1 (the number depends on the job number, usually it is 1, but you can easily pull the list using the command jobs)
Finally invoke the command disown (followed by the jobid ... same as with bg command)
This will remove the parent-child relationship between your shell and the process in background, preventing it to die when your shell is terminated.
2
This answer is the best! Why is everyone talking aboutscreen
, the question was posed post-login event, how to keep the processes running, now after logging in but before starting them. Great answer Jorge, you've really helped me! :)
– jwbensley
Aug 10 '12 at 17:13
1
Simplybg
(without%1
) is often enough, since the default is the current job
– Walter Tross
Nov 23 '12 at 21:55
It would be nice to have a comprehensive answer: A priori (setting up in advance): ascii terminal screen (old), tmux (neewer); X windows: vnc (old, still maintained), xpra (newer), with xpra being rootless. A posterior (persisting after you started): ^Z, disown, ... But I am too lazy to flesh it out more than this.
– Krazy Glew
Jul 12 '18 at 23:02
add a comment |
Hey, while I agreed that screen is the most efective option.
You can use vncserver and then start the process on it.
Also if your only interes is to have the process running and no need to take control back of it, and utterly most important you were not aware you will need to close the session and you have the process already running, you are not of luck if you used bash as the shell
First you need to send the process to background by typing Ctrl+Z followed by bg %1 (the number depends on the job number, usually it is 1, but you can easily pull the list using the command jobs)
Finally invoke the command disown (followed by the jobid ... same as with bg command)
This will remove the parent-child relationship between your shell and the process in background, preventing it to die when your shell is terminated.
2
This answer is the best! Why is everyone talking aboutscreen
, the question was posed post-login event, how to keep the processes running, now after logging in but before starting them. Great answer Jorge, you've really helped me! :)
– jwbensley
Aug 10 '12 at 17:13
1
Simplybg
(without%1
) is often enough, since the default is the current job
– Walter Tross
Nov 23 '12 at 21:55
It would be nice to have a comprehensive answer: A priori (setting up in advance): ascii terminal screen (old), tmux (neewer); X windows: vnc (old, still maintained), xpra (newer), with xpra being rootless. A posterior (persisting after you started): ^Z, disown, ... But I am too lazy to flesh it out more than this.
– Krazy Glew
Jul 12 '18 at 23:02
add a comment |
Hey, while I agreed that screen is the most efective option.
You can use vncserver and then start the process on it.
Also if your only interes is to have the process running and no need to take control back of it, and utterly most important you were not aware you will need to close the session and you have the process already running, you are not of luck if you used bash as the shell
First you need to send the process to background by typing Ctrl+Z followed by bg %1 (the number depends on the job number, usually it is 1, but you can easily pull the list using the command jobs)
Finally invoke the command disown (followed by the jobid ... same as with bg command)
This will remove the parent-child relationship between your shell and the process in background, preventing it to die when your shell is terminated.
Hey, while I agreed that screen is the most efective option.
You can use vncserver and then start the process on it.
Also if your only interes is to have the process running and no need to take control back of it, and utterly most important you were not aware you will need to close the session and you have the process already running, you are not of luck if you used bash as the shell
First you need to send the process to background by typing Ctrl+Z followed by bg %1 (the number depends on the job number, usually it is 1, but you can easily pull the list using the command jobs)
Finally invoke the command disown (followed by the jobid ... same as with bg command)
This will remove the parent-child relationship between your shell and the process in background, preventing it to die when your shell is terminated.
answered Jun 6 '11 at 21:29
Jorge GutierrezJorge Gutierrez
8911
8911
2
This answer is the best! Why is everyone talking aboutscreen
, the question was posed post-login event, how to keep the processes running, now after logging in but before starting them. Great answer Jorge, you've really helped me! :)
– jwbensley
Aug 10 '12 at 17:13
1
Simplybg
(without%1
) is often enough, since the default is the current job
– Walter Tross
Nov 23 '12 at 21:55
It would be nice to have a comprehensive answer: A priori (setting up in advance): ascii terminal screen (old), tmux (neewer); X windows: vnc (old, still maintained), xpra (newer), with xpra being rootless. A posterior (persisting after you started): ^Z, disown, ... But I am too lazy to flesh it out more than this.
– Krazy Glew
Jul 12 '18 at 23:02
add a comment |
2
This answer is the best! Why is everyone talking aboutscreen
, the question was posed post-login event, how to keep the processes running, now after logging in but before starting them. Great answer Jorge, you've really helped me! :)
– jwbensley
Aug 10 '12 at 17:13
1
Simplybg
(without%1
) is often enough, since the default is the current job
– Walter Tross
Nov 23 '12 at 21:55
It would be nice to have a comprehensive answer: A priori (setting up in advance): ascii terminal screen (old), tmux (neewer); X windows: vnc (old, still maintained), xpra (newer), with xpra being rootless. A posterior (persisting after you started): ^Z, disown, ... But I am too lazy to flesh it out more than this.
– Krazy Glew
Jul 12 '18 at 23:02
2
2
This answer is the best! Why is everyone talking about
screen
, the question was posed post-login event, how to keep the processes running, now after logging in but before starting them. Great answer Jorge, you've really helped me! :)– jwbensley
Aug 10 '12 at 17:13
This answer is the best! Why is everyone talking about
screen
, the question was posed post-login event, how to keep the processes running, now after logging in but before starting them. Great answer Jorge, you've really helped me! :)– jwbensley
Aug 10 '12 at 17:13
1
1
Simply
bg
(without %1
) is often enough, since the default is the current job– Walter Tross
Nov 23 '12 at 21:55
Simply
bg
(without %1
) is often enough, since the default is the current job– Walter Tross
Nov 23 '12 at 21:55
It would be nice to have a comprehensive answer: A priori (setting up in advance): ascii terminal screen (old), tmux (neewer); X windows: vnc (old, still maintained), xpra (newer), with xpra being rootless. A posterior (persisting after you started): ^Z, disown, ... But I am too lazy to flesh it out more than this.
– Krazy Glew
Jul 12 '18 at 23:02
It would be nice to have a comprehensive answer: A priori (setting up in advance): ascii terminal screen (old), tmux (neewer); X windows: vnc (old, still maintained), xpra (newer), with xpra being rootless. A posterior (persisting after you started): ^Z, disown, ... But I am too lazy to flesh it out more than this.
– Krazy Glew
Jul 12 '18 at 23:02
add a comment |
For a single shell script that I have running over a long period of time, I will login, and run the process in the background using '&'.
Example:
/path/to/my/script &
I've logged out and disconnected my SSH session. When I log in some time later, the script is still executing as proven by continuous data collection from the script.
3
Yes, I would like to know how screen / tmux is better than this simple solution.
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:51
Yes, I can see this on my ubuntu also, but it should not happen in theory. I don't understand why
– Daniel Pinyol
Apr 22 '16 at 13:08
1
@MadsSkjern Because you can't enter any input into the script using this method.
– Ken Sharp
Feb 10 '17 at 22:18
1
@MadsSkjern the reason is that if you run processes like this with&
if you log out and in to your SSH session, the process will still be running however you will not be able to see the outputof that process (if your script echoed something you won't see it, but if it writes a file the file will be there)
– DarkCygnus
Aug 24 '17 at 16:20
add a comment |
For a single shell script that I have running over a long period of time, I will login, and run the process in the background using '&'.
Example:
/path/to/my/script &
I've logged out and disconnected my SSH session. When I log in some time later, the script is still executing as proven by continuous data collection from the script.
3
Yes, I would like to know how screen / tmux is better than this simple solution.
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:51
Yes, I can see this on my ubuntu also, but it should not happen in theory. I don't understand why
– Daniel Pinyol
Apr 22 '16 at 13:08
1
@MadsSkjern Because you can't enter any input into the script using this method.
– Ken Sharp
Feb 10 '17 at 22:18
1
@MadsSkjern the reason is that if you run processes like this with&
if you log out and in to your SSH session, the process will still be running however you will not be able to see the outputof that process (if your script echoed something you won't see it, but if it writes a file the file will be there)
– DarkCygnus
Aug 24 '17 at 16:20
add a comment |
For a single shell script that I have running over a long period of time, I will login, and run the process in the background using '&'.
Example:
/path/to/my/script &
I've logged out and disconnected my SSH session. When I log in some time later, the script is still executing as proven by continuous data collection from the script.
For a single shell script that I have running over a long period of time, I will login, and run the process in the background using '&'.
Example:
/path/to/my/script &
I've logged out and disconnected my SSH session. When I log in some time later, the script is still executing as proven by continuous data collection from the script.
answered Jul 29 '14 at 14:58
user108430
3
Yes, I would like to know how screen / tmux is better than this simple solution.
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:51
Yes, I can see this on my ubuntu also, but it should not happen in theory. I don't understand why
– Daniel Pinyol
Apr 22 '16 at 13:08
1
@MadsSkjern Because you can't enter any input into the script using this method.
– Ken Sharp
Feb 10 '17 at 22:18
1
@MadsSkjern the reason is that if you run processes like this with&
if you log out and in to your SSH session, the process will still be running however you will not be able to see the outputof that process (if your script echoed something you won't see it, but if it writes a file the file will be there)
– DarkCygnus
Aug 24 '17 at 16:20
add a comment |
3
Yes, I would like to know how screen / tmux is better than this simple solution.
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:51
Yes, I can see this on my ubuntu also, but it should not happen in theory. I don't understand why
– Daniel Pinyol
Apr 22 '16 at 13:08
1
@MadsSkjern Because you can't enter any input into the script using this method.
– Ken Sharp
Feb 10 '17 at 22:18
1
@MadsSkjern the reason is that if you run processes like this with&
if you log out and in to your SSH session, the process will still be running however you will not be able to see the outputof that process (if your script echoed something you won't see it, but if it writes a file the file will be there)
– DarkCygnus
Aug 24 '17 at 16:20
3
3
Yes, I would like to know how screen / tmux is better than this simple solution.
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:51
Yes, I would like to know how screen / tmux is better than this simple solution.
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:51
Yes, I can see this on my ubuntu also, but it should not happen in theory. I don't understand why
– Daniel Pinyol
Apr 22 '16 at 13:08
Yes, I can see this on my ubuntu also, but it should not happen in theory. I don't understand why
– Daniel Pinyol
Apr 22 '16 at 13:08
1
1
@MadsSkjern Because you can't enter any input into the script using this method.
– Ken Sharp
Feb 10 '17 at 22:18
@MadsSkjern Because you can't enter any input into the script using this method.
– Ken Sharp
Feb 10 '17 at 22:18
1
1
@MadsSkjern the reason is that if you run processes like this with
&
if you log out and in to your SSH session, the process will still be running however you will not be able to see the outputof that process (if your script echoed something you won't see it, but if it writes a file the file will be there)– DarkCygnus
Aug 24 '17 at 16:20
@MadsSkjern the reason is that if you run processes like this with
&
if you log out and in to your SSH session, the process will still be running however you will not be able to see the outputof that process (if your script echoed something you won't see it, but if it writes a file the file will be there)– DarkCygnus
Aug 24 '17 at 16:20
add a comment |
You should check out GNU Screen and see if it helps you. Depending on how you need you application to run in realtime, it may cause more issues than it solves, but at least it will allow you to resume your session as if you never left it.
How to use :
- Use the command
screen
for the first start, scroll through the introduction messages, you should be handed a terminal. - C-a C-c opens another terminal
- C-a C-k kills a terminal
- You can use C-a C-Space and C-a C-Backspace to cycle through terminals
- C-a C-a is handy if you're mostly using only two terminals
- C-a C-d detachs the current screen session and exits screens. You can then use
screen -r
to resume that session. You can have several detached screen sessions at once, in this case you'll be displayed a list of available sessions.
There are many other options, for example split screens, and also all shortcuts are fully customizable.
add a comment |
You should check out GNU Screen and see if it helps you. Depending on how you need you application to run in realtime, it may cause more issues than it solves, but at least it will allow you to resume your session as if you never left it.
How to use :
- Use the command
screen
for the first start, scroll through the introduction messages, you should be handed a terminal. - C-a C-c opens another terminal
- C-a C-k kills a terminal
- You can use C-a C-Space and C-a C-Backspace to cycle through terminals
- C-a C-a is handy if you're mostly using only two terminals
- C-a C-d detachs the current screen session and exits screens. You can then use
screen -r
to resume that session. You can have several detached screen sessions at once, in this case you'll be displayed a list of available sessions.
There are many other options, for example split screens, and also all shortcuts are fully customizable.
add a comment |
You should check out GNU Screen and see if it helps you. Depending on how you need you application to run in realtime, it may cause more issues than it solves, but at least it will allow you to resume your session as if you never left it.
How to use :
- Use the command
screen
for the first start, scroll through the introduction messages, you should be handed a terminal. - C-a C-c opens another terminal
- C-a C-k kills a terminal
- You can use C-a C-Space and C-a C-Backspace to cycle through terminals
- C-a C-a is handy if you're mostly using only two terminals
- C-a C-d detachs the current screen session and exits screens. You can then use
screen -r
to resume that session. You can have several detached screen sessions at once, in this case you'll be displayed a list of available sessions.
There are many other options, for example split screens, and also all shortcuts are fully customizable.
You should check out GNU Screen and see if it helps you. Depending on how you need you application to run in realtime, it may cause more issues than it solves, but at least it will allow you to resume your session as if you never left it.
How to use :
- Use the command
screen
for the first start, scroll through the introduction messages, you should be handed a terminal. - C-a C-c opens another terminal
- C-a C-k kills a terminal
- You can use C-a C-Space and C-a C-Backspace to cycle through terminals
- C-a C-a is handy if you're mostly using only two terminals
- C-a C-d detachs the current screen session and exits screens. You can then use
screen -r
to resume that session. You can have several detached screen sessions at once, in this case you'll be displayed a list of available sessions.
There are many other options, for example split screens, and also all shortcuts are fully customizable.
answered May 22 '12 at 15:31
T. VerronT. Verron
216210
216210
add a comment |
add a comment |
Simplest answer...
ctrl+z will suspend the running program
"bg" will run it in the background
5
Without disowning the process (with something likedisown
ornohup
), this will not usually keep the process running after the end of the SSH session.
– Eliah Kagan
Aug 13 '13 at 0:32
3
On my Ubuntu server, with default setup, it really does keep running!
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:53
add a comment |
Simplest answer...
ctrl+z will suspend the running program
"bg" will run it in the background
5
Without disowning the process (with something likedisown
ornohup
), this will not usually keep the process running after the end of the SSH session.
– Eliah Kagan
Aug 13 '13 at 0:32
3
On my Ubuntu server, with default setup, it really does keep running!
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:53
add a comment |
Simplest answer...
ctrl+z will suspend the running program
"bg" will run it in the background
Simplest answer...
ctrl+z will suspend the running program
"bg" will run it in the background
answered Aug 13 '13 at 0:28
RoopRoop
411
411
5
Without disowning the process (with something likedisown
ornohup
), this will not usually keep the process running after the end of the SSH session.
– Eliah Kagan
Aug 13 '13 at 0:32
3
On my Ubuntu server, with default setup, it really does keep running!
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:53
add a comment |
5
Without disowning the process (with something likedisown
ornohup
), this will not usually keep the process running after the end of the SSH session.
– Eliah Kagan
Aug 13 '13 at 0:32
3
On my Ubuntu server, with default setup, it really does keep running!
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:53
5
5
Without disowning the process (with something like
disown
or nohup
), this will not usually keep the process running after the end of the SSH session.– Eliah Kagan
Aug 13 '13 at 0:32
Without disowning the process (with something like
disown
or nohup
), this will not usually keep the process running after the end of the SSH session.– Eliah Kagan
Aug 13 '13 at 0:32
3
3
On my Ubuntu server, with default setup, it really does keep running!
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:53
On my Ubuntu server, with default setup, it really does keep running!
– Mads Skjern
Mar 16 '15 at 8:53
add a comment |
The easiest way is to run your command in the background with &
. Then just write:
disown -a
add a comment |
The easiest way is to run your command in the background with &
. Then just write:
disown -a
add a comment |
The easiest way is to run your command in the background with &
. Then just write:
disown -a
The easiest way is to run your command in the background with &
. Then just write:
disown -a
edited Jan 11 '17 at 18:09
Eliah Kagan
83.3k22229369
83.3k22229369
answered Jan 11 '17 at 3:52
ZibriZibri
24327
24327
add a comment |
add a comment |
While everyone says to use disown
(the only option you have after you already started the process), nohup
, or even running the command in screen
, which is useful if you want to see all the output from the command... I'm a fan of screen
.. I still have tried most recent mainstream distributions of Linux and simply putting the job in the background and quitting does not cause all the processes that are running to die. There must be a global setting or something. I'm trying this on some pretty old systems (slackware 12) and my test script keeps running until I manually kill it:
shell$ cat > test.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
while(1)
sleep(1);
shell$ perl ./test.pl &
shell$ exit
logout
shell$ ps aux test.pl
mymom 31337 1 0 13:25 ? 00:00:00 perl ./test.pl
shell$
While I agree that screen
would be the best way to run this, even if my script wrote to log files or whatever.. I've never needed to use disown -a
or nohup
unless it was out of complete paranoia. Maybe someone can shed some light on how bash behaves by default? Maybe some system administrators change the defaults on large shells to keep their users' processes from overloading the system?
If you have any further query please ask it as a new question
– heemayl
Jul 30 '15 at 2:05
add a comment |
While everyone says to use disown
(the only option you have after you already started the process), nohup
, or even running the command in screen
, which is useful if you want to see all the output from the command... I'm a fan of screen
.. I still have tried most recent mainstream distributions of Linux and simply putting the job in the background and quitting does not cause all the processes that are running to die. There must be a global setting or something. I'm trying this on some pretty old systems (slackware 12) and my test script keeps running until I manually kill it:
shell$ cat > test.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
while(1)
sleep(1);
shell$ perl ./test.pl &
shell$ exit
logout
shell$ ps aux test.pl
mymom 31337 1 0 13:25 ? 00:00:00 perl ./test.pl
shell$
While I agree that screen
would be the best way to run this, even if my script wrote to log files or whatever.. I've never needed to use disown -a
or nohup
unless it was out of complete paranoia. Maybe someone can shed some light on how bash behaves by default? Maybe some system administrators change the defaults on large shells to keep their users' processes from overloading the system?
If you have any further query please ask it as a new question
– heemayl
Jul 30 '15 at 2:05
add a comment |
While everyone says to use disown
(the only option you have after you already started the process), nohup
, or even running the command in screen
, which is useful if you want to see all the output from the command... I'm a fan of screen
.. I still have tried most recent mainstream distributions of Linux and simply putting the job in the background and quitting does not cause all the processes that are running to die. There must be a global setting or something. I'm trying this on some pretty old systems (slackware 12) and my test script keeps running until I manually kill it:
shell$ cat > test.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
while(1)
sleep(1);
shell$ perl ./test.pl &
shell$ exit
logout
shell$ ps aux test.pl
mymom 31337 1 0 13:25 ? 00:00:00 perl ./test.pl
shell$
While I agree that screen
would be the best way to run this, even if my script wrote to log files or whatever.. I've never needed to use disown -a
or nohup
unless it was out of complete paranoia. Maybe someone can shed some light on how bash behaves by default? Maybe some system administrators change the defaults on large shells to keep their users' processes from overloading the system?
While everyone says to use disown
(the only option you have after you already started the process), nohup
, or even running the command in screen
, which is useful if you want to see all the output from the command... I'm a fan of screen
.. I still have tried most recent mainstream distributions of Linux and simply putting the job in the background and quitting does not cause all the processes that are running to die. There must be a global setting or something. I'm trying this on some pretty old systems (slackware 12) and my test script keeps running until I manually kill it:
shell$ cat > test.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
while(1)
sleep(1);
shell$ perl ./test.pl &
shell$ exit
logout
shell$ ps aux test.pl
mymom 31337 1 0 13:25 ? 00:00:00 perl ./test.pl
shell$
While I agree that screen
would be the best way to run this, even if my script wrote to log files or whatever.. I've never needed to use disown -a
or nohup
unless it was out of complete paranoia. Maybe someone can shed some light on how bash behaves by default? Maybe some system administrators change the defaults on large shells to keep their users' processes from overloading the system?
edited Jul 30 '15 at 2:04
heemayl
68.2k11144215
68.2k11144215
answered Jul 29 '15 at 17:42
Dan GullageDan Gullage
1
1
If you have any further query please ask it as a new question
– heemayl
Jul 30 '15 at 2:05
add a comment |
If you have any further query please ask it as a new question
– heemayl
Jul 30 '15 at 2:05
If you have any further query please ask it as a new question
– heemayl
Jul 30 '15 at 2:05
If you have any further query please ask it as a new question
– heemayl
Jul 30 '15 at 2:05
add a comment |
Instead of :
cmd options;
Add before nohup
:
nohup cmd options &
Then, you will be able to see the console stdout by :
tail -f nohup.out
add a comment |
Instead of :
cmd options;
Add before nohup
:
nohup cmd options &
Then, you will be able to see the console stdout by :
tail -f nohup.out
add a comment |
Instead of :
cmd options;
Add before nohup
:
nohup cmd options &
Then, you will be able to see the console stdout by :
tail -f nohup.out
Instead of :
cmd options;
Add before nohup
:
nohup cmd options &
Then, you will be able to see the console stdout by :
tail -f nohup.out
answered Oct 22 '16 at 10:51
Abdennour TOUMIAbdennour TOUMI
5,31343546
5,31343546
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by heemayl Sep 16 '15 at 20:52
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
2
Related: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4004/…
– Anton Tarasenko
Nov 23 '17 at 9:23