Showing $mathbb Z_4 times mathbb Z_2$ to be a groupSolid whose full symmetry group corresponds to $A_4timesmathbb Z_2$Group extension of $mathbb Z_4$ by $mathbb Z_2$Question about method of finding homomorphisms from $mathbb Z_4$ to $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Regular representations of $Z_2 times Z_2$ and $Z_4$ and their decompositiononto homomorphic mapping from $Z_4 $ to $Z_2 times Z_2$Showing an isomorphism exists between either $mathbb Z_4$ or $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Find a subgroup of $Bbb Z_4oplusBbb Z_2$ not of the form $Hoplus K$ for some $Hle Bbb Z_4, Kle Bbb Z_2$.

What drugs were used in England during the High Middle Ages?

Was the lunar landing site always in the same plane as the CM's orbit?

What is the source of the fear in the Hallow spell's extra Fear effect?

Looking for the comic book where Spider-Man was [mistakenly] addressed as Super-Man

Dissuading my girlfriend from a scam

What fraction of 2x2 USA call signs are vanity calls?

Why did Boris Johnson call for new elections?

Euro sign in table with siunitx

Can taking my 1-week-old on a 6-7 hours journey in the car lead to medical complications?

In-universe, why does Doc Brown program the time machine to go to 1955?

extract specific cheracters from each line

Why does the seven segment display have decimal point at the right?

Round away from zero

Why there is no wireless switch?

Does the Giant Toad's Swallow acid damage take effect only at the start of its next turn?

What is the justification for Dirac's large numbers hypothesis?

How can I hint that my character isn't real?

Infinitely many primes

Who's this voice acting performer?

Friend is very nit picky about side comments I don't intend to be taken too seriously

Book where main character comes out of stasis bubble

Why Is Sojdlg123aljg a Common Password?

How to reproduce this notation?

Why are UK MPs allowed to not vote (but it counts as a no)?



Showing $mathbb Z_4 times mathbb Z_2$ to be a group


Solid whose full symmetry group corresponds to $A_4timesmathbb Z_2$Group extension of $mathbb Z_4$ by $mathbb Z_2$Question about method of finding homomorphisms from $mathbb Z_4$ to $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Regular representations of $Z_2 times Z_2$ and $Z_4$ and their decompositiononto homomorphic mapping from $Z_4 $ to $Z_2 times Z_2$Showing an isomorphism exists between either $mathbb Z_4$ or $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Find a subgroup of $Bbb Z_4oplusBbb Z_2$ not of the form $Hoplus K$ for some $Hle Bbb Z_4, Kle Bbb Z_2$.






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


I've been posed the question:




Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$



An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$




How do I show that this is a group?



I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:32







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:37







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 15 at 7:43


















1












$begingroup$


I've been posed the question:




Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$



An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$




How do I show that this is a group?



I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:32







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:37







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 15 at 7:43














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I've been posed the question:




Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$



An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$




How do I show that this is a group?



I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I've been posed the question:




Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$



An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$




How do I show that this is a group?



I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach







abstract-algebra group-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 15 at 8:51









YuiTo Cheng

3,2978 gold badges17 silver badges49 bronze badges




3,2978 gold badges17 silver badges49 bronze badges










asked Apr 15 at 7:29









woddalwoddal

214 bronze badges




214 bronze badges










  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:32







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:37







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 15 at 7:43













  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:32







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 15 at 7:37







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 15 at 7:43








5




5




$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32





$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32





1




1




$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35





$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35





1




1




$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36




$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36




1




1




$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37





$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37





3




3




$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43





$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














$begingroup$

Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.



The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)



The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
&=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
endalign$$



Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    3














    $begingroup$

    In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.



    In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3188388%2fshowing-mathbb-z-4-times-mathbb-z-2-to-be-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      $begingroup$

      Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.



      The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)



      The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
      &=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
      endalign$$



      Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        3














        $begingroup$

        Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.



        The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)



        The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
        &=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
        endalign$$



        Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          3














          3










          3







          $begingroup$

          Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.



          The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)



          The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
          &=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
          endalign$$



          Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.



          The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)



          The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
          &=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
          endalign$$



          Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 15 at 8:01









          ShaunShaun

          12k12 gold badges37 silver badges92 bronze badges




          12k12 gold badges37 silver badges92 bronze badges


























              3














              $begingroup$

              In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.



              In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



















                3














                $begingroup$

                In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.



                In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  3














                  3










                  3







                  $begingroup$

                  In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.



                  In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.



                  In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 15 at 8:06









                  YiFanYiFan

                  6,7082 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges




                  6,7082 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3188388%2fshowing-mathbb-z-4-times-mathbb-z-2-to-be-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                      Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                      Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?