Showing $mathbb Z_4 times mathbb Z_2$ to be a groupSolid whose full symmetry group corresponds to $A_4timesmathbb Z_2$Group extension of $mathbb Z_4$ by $mathbb Z_2$Question about method of finding homomorphisms from $mathbb Z_4$ to $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Regular representations of $Z_2 times Z_2$ and $Z_4$ and their decompositiononto homomorphic mapping from $Z_4 $ to $Z_2 times Z_2$Showing an isomorphism exists between either $mathbb Z_4$ or $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Find a subgroup of $Bbb Z_4oplusBbb Z_2$ not of the form $Hoplus K$ for some $Hle Bbb Z_4, Kle Bbb Z_2$.
What drugs were used in England during the High Middle Ages?
Was the lunar landing site always in the same plane as the CM's orbit?
What is the source of the fear in the Hallow spell's extra Fear effect?
Looking for the comic book where Spider-Man was [mistakenly] addressed as Super-Man
Dissuading my girlfriend from a scam
What fraction of 2x2 USA call signs are vanity calls?
Why did Boris Johnson call for new elections?
Euro sign in table with siunitx
Can taking my 1-week-old on a 6-7 hours journey in the car lead to medical complications?
In-universe, why does Doc Brown program the time machine to go to 1955?
extract specific cheracters from each line
Why does the seven segment display have decimal point at the right?
Round away from zero
Why there is no wireless switch?
Does the Giant Toad's Swallow acid damage take effect only at the start of its next turn?
What is the justification for Dirac's large numbers hypothesis?
How can I hint that my character isn't real?
Infinitely many primes
Who's this voice acting performer?
Friend is very nit picky about side comments I don't intend to be taken too seriously
Book where main character comes out of stasis bubble
Why Is Sojdlg123aljg a Common Password?
How to reproduce this notation?
Why are UK MPs allowed to not vote (but it counts as a no)?
Showing $mathbb Z_4 times mathbb Z_2$ to be a group
Solid whose full symmetry group corresponds to $A_4timesmathbb Z_2$Group extension of $mathbb Z_4$ by $mathbb Z_2$Question about method of finding homomorphisms from $mathbb Z_4$ to $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Regular representations of $Z_2 times Z_2$ and $Z_4$ and their decompositiononto homomorphic mapping from $Z_4 $ to $Z_2 times Z_2$Showing an isomorphism exists between either $mathbb Z_4$ or $mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2$Find a subgroup of $Bbb Z_4oplusBbb Z_2$ not of the form $Hoplus K$ for some $Hle Bbb Z_4, Kle Bbb Z_2$.
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I've been posed the question:
Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$
An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$
How do I show that this is a group?
I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've been posed the question:
Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$
An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$
How do I show that this is a group?
I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32
1
$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35
1
$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36
1
$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37
3
$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've been posed the question:
Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$
An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$
How do I show that this is a group?
I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
I've been posed the question:
Let $P$ be the pairs $(a,b)$ where $a in Bbb Z_4$, and $b in Bbb Z_2$
An operation, $*$, is defined by: $$(a,b)*(c,d)=(a+c pmod 4, b+d pmod 2)$$ for all $(a,c),(b,d)in P$
How do I show that this is a group?
I know how to do this with multiplication tables by working through the axioms but I don't know how to apply these to this question, nor if that's the best approach
abstract-algebra group-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory
edited Apr 15 at 8:51
YuiTo Cheng
3,2978 gold badges17 silver badges49 bronze badges
3,2978 gold badges17 silver badges49 bronze badges
asked Apr 15 at 7:29
woddalwoddal
214 bronze badges
214 bronze badges
5
$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32
1
$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35
1
$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36
1
$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37
3
$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32
1
$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35
1
$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36
1
$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37
3
$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43
5
5
$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32
$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32
1
1
$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35
$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35
1
1
$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36
$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36
1
1
$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37
$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37
3
3
$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43
$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.
The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)
The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
&=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
endalign$$
Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.
In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3188388%2fshowing-mathbb-z-4-times-mathbb-z-2-to-be-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.
The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)
The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
&=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
endalign$$
Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.
The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)
The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
&=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
endalign$$
Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.
The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)
The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
&=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
endalign$$
Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.
$endgroup$
Associativity follows from that of $(Bbb Z_4, +_4)$ and of $(Bbb Z_2, +_2)$.
The identity is $(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2)$. (Why?)
The inverse of $(a,b)$ under $*$ is given by $(-a, -b)$ since $$beginalign(a,b)*(-a, -b)&=(a+(-a)pmod 4, b+(-b)pmod 2)\
&=(0pmod 4, 0pmod 2).
endalign$$
Closure follows from the closure of $Bbb Z_4$ under $+_4$ and of $Bbb Z_2$ under $+_2$.
answered Apr 15 at 8:01
ShaunShaun
12k12 gold badges37 silver badges92 bronze badges
12k12 gold badges37 silver badges92 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.
In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.
In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.
In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.
$endgroup$
In general, the group $Gtimes H$ (for groups $G,H$) with elements in the cartesian product (the set) of $G$ and $H$, and the group operation defined component-wise: The multiplication of $(g_1,h_1),(g_2,h_2)in Gtimes H$ being defined by $(g_1,h_1)(g_2,h_2)=(g_1g_2,h_1h_2)$ always gives a group. This is because the associativity follows from the group structure of $G$ and $H$, and the identity is $(1_G,1_H)$. You can check the other group axioms, which all follow from the fact that $G,H$ are groups. The group $Gtimes H$ is called the direct product of $G$ and $H$.
In particular, you just need that $mathbb Z_4$ and $mathbb Z_2$ to be groups to prove your conclusion in this case.
answered Apr 15 at 8:06
YiFanYiFan
6,7082 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges
6,7082 gold badges12 silver badges34 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3188388%2fshowing-mathbb-z-4-times-mathbb-z-2-to-be-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
$begingroup$
Check the three Groups axioms : closure, associativity, identity.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:32
1
$begingroup$
1st : is it true that $(a,b) * (c,d) in mathbb Z$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:35
1
$begingroup$
2nd : is it true that : $[(a,b) * (c,d)] * (e,f) = (a,b) * [(c,d) * (e,f)]$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:36
1
$begingroup$
3rd : is it true that there is $(e_1,e_2)$ such that $(a,b) * (e_1,e_2) = ldots$ ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 15 at 7:37
3
$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA You forgot inverses. Closure is usually not listed as one of the three group axioms, but rather a required property of $*$ before we even speak about the group axioms.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 15 at 7:43