Docker network adapter hijacking hostname resolutionLocal hostname resolution with local Ubuntu DNS server failsHow can I connect to remote windows domain knowing gateway hostname and domain name?Setting Internet GatewayDNS/Bind9 Name resolution with no FQDN auf sever itself fails, clients are okServer name resolution messed up when running PiHole in DockerUbuntu - Basic Host Name Resolution 18.04 IssuesUbuntu 18.04 - no DNS query

How likely are you to be injured by falling shot from a game shoot?

How time is defined in astronomical science

Can I say: “The train departs at 16 past every hour“?

Has an engineer called Trevor Jackson invented a revolutionary battery allowing for a car range of 1500 miles?

In what way were Renaissance battles like chess matches?

How should chips with pins on bottom be drawn?

If I am just replacing the car engine, do I need to replace the odometer as well?

How are side-channel attacks executed? What does an attacker need to execute a side channel attack?

How could Thanos survive this attack?

Washing the skin of a dead rat

Graph with cropped letters

Peano's dot notation

Can the Wish spell be used to allow someone to be able to cast all of their spells at will?

Comparison of C-Cl bond length in CH3Cl and CF3Cl

A Caesar cipher in Python3

Does the on'yomi of 輪 (リン) have any relation to the English "ring", or is it a coincidence?

Instant coffee melts like chocolate

Group Policy application on Domain Controllers

How do I disable vim from producing backup files?

Adding coordinate constant to file in QGIS

Induction Inequality Proof

Is it possible to be admitted to CS PhD programs (in US) with scholarship at age 18?

Is there evidence for Col. Vindman literally being a "Never Trump"?

Why was the Vulcan bomber used for the Falklands raid?



Docker network adapter hijacking hostname resolution


Local hostname resolution with local Ubuntu DNS server failsHow can I connect to remote windows domain knowing gateway hostname and domain name?Setting Internet GatewayDNS/Bind9 Name resolution with no FQDN auf sever itself fails, clients are okServer name resolution messed up when running PiHole in DockerUbuntu - Basic Host Name Resolution 18.04 IssuesUbuntu 18.04 - no DNS query






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









0

















I'm struggling to figure out why my hostname resolution is being resolved locally and pointing to my docker networking interface and was hoping someone might be able to point me in the right direction.



I have 3 (relevant) entities in my network.



  • A - An Asus RT--AC68U router -> hostname portal

  • B - My normal laptop

  • C - A server running Ubuntu 18.04 -> hostname server

The basic setup is as follows:



  • A has dnsmasq active and is setup to always point 192.168.1.2 to C.

  • A has dnsmasq setup to always forward subdomains of server.local to C

  • A has a domain name .local setup internally

  • C has docker v18.09.6 running

From B



> ping portal
PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
> ping portal.local
PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
> ping server
PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
> ping server.local
PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
> ping test.server.local
PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes


I would expect the same results from C. The first ping should be resolved due to the hostname file and loopback. The second and third should go to the router for resolution.



From C



> ping portal
ping portal.local (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ping portal.local
ping: portal.local: Name or service not known
> ping server
PING server (127.0.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ping server.local
PING server.local (172.17.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ping test.server.local
ping: test.server.local: Name or service not known
> ifconfig docker0
docker0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 172.17.255.255


As you can see,



  • portal hostname is resolved but including the domain results in unknown service

  • server is resolved by loopback interface. Good

  • server.local for some reason points to docker network interface

  • test.server.local can't be resolved because it never gets to my router

I understand that the docker0 interface is setup as the default network for containers to join when no network is explicitly set. What I don't understand is why this network is handling resolution or at least not forwarding resolution on to my router when it can't resolve it.










share|improve this question
































    0

















    I'm struggling to figure out why my hostname resolution is being resolved locally and pointing to my docker networking interface and was hoping someone might be able to point me in the right direction.



    I have 3 (relevant) entities in my network.



    • A - An Asus RT--AC68U router -> hostname portal

    • B - My normal laptop

    • C - A server running Ubuntu 18.04 -> hostname server

    The basic setup is as follows:



    • A has dnsmasq active and is setup to always point 192.168.1.2 to C.

    • A has dnsmasq setup to always forward subdomains of server.local to C

    • A has a domain name .local setup internally

    • C has docker v18.09.6 running

    From B



    > ping portal
    PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
    > ping portal.local
    PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
    > ping server
    PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
    > ping server.local
    PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
    > ping test.server.local
    PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes


    I would expect the same results from C. The first ping should be resolved due to the hostname file and loopback. The second and third should go to the router for resolution.



    From C



    > ping portal
    ping portal.local (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
    > ping portal.local
    ping: portal.local: Name or service not known
    > ping server
    PING server (127.0.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
    > ping server.local
    PING server.local (172.17.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
    > ping test.server.local
    ping: test.server.local: Name or service not known
    > ifconfig docker0
    docker0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
    inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 172.17.255.255


    As you can see,



    • portal hostname is resolved but including the domain results in unknown service

    • server is resolved by loopback interface. Good

    • server.local for some reason points to docker network interface

    • test.server.local can't be resolved because it never gets to my router

    I understand that the docker0 interface is setup as the default network for containers to join when no network is explicitly set. What I don't understand is why this network is handling resolution or at least not forwarding resolution on to my router when it can't resolve it.










    share|improve this question




























      0












      0








      0








      I'm struggling to figure out why my hostname resolution is being resolved locally and pointing to my docker networking interface and was hoping someone might be able to point me in the right direction.



      I have 3 (relevant) entities in my network.



      • A - An Asus RT--AC68U router -> hostname portal

      • B - My normal laptop

      • C - A server running Ubuntu 18.04 -> hostname server

      The basic setup is as follows:



      • A has dnsmasq active and is setup to always point 192.168.1.2 to C.

      • A has dnsmasq setup to always forward subdomains of server.local to C

      • A has a domain name .local setup internally

      • C has docker v18.09.6 running

      From B



      > ping portal
      PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
      > ping portal.local
      PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
      > ping server
      PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
      > ping server.local
      PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
      > ping test.server.local
      PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes


      I would expect the same results from C. The first ping should be resolved due to the hostname file and loopback. The second and third should go to the router for resolution.



      From C



      > ping portal
      ping portal.local (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
      > ping portal.local
      ping: portal.local: Name or service not known
      > ping server
      PING server (127.0.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
      > ping server.local
      PING server.local (172.17.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
      > ping test.server.local
      ping: test.server.local: Name or service not known
      > ifconfig docker0
      docker0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
      inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 172.17.255.255


      As you can see,



      • portal hostname is resolved but including the domain results in unknown service

      • server is resolved by loopback interface. Good

      • server.local for some reason points to docker network interface

      • test.server.local can't be resolved because it never gets to my router

      I understand that the docker0 interface is setup as the default network for containers to join when no network is explicitly set. What I don't understand is why this network is handling resolution or at least not forwarding resolution on to my router when it can't resolve it.










      share|improve this question















      I'm struggling to figure out why my hostname resolution is being resolved locally and pointing to my docker networking interface and was hoping someone might be able to point me in the right direction.



      I have 3 (relevant) entities in my network.



      • A - An Asus RT--AC68U router -> hostname portal

      • B - My normal laptop

      • C - A server running Ubuntu 18.04 -> hostname server

      The basic setup is as follows:



      • A has dnsmasq active and is setup to always point 192.168.1.2 to C.

      • A has dnsmasq setup to always forward subdomains of server.local to C

      • A has a domain name .local setup internally

      • C has docker v18.09.6 running

      From B



      > ping portal
      PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
      > ping portal.local
      PING portal.local (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
      > ping server
      PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
      > ping server.local
      PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
      > ping test.server.local
      PING server.local (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes


      I would expect the same results from C. The first ping should be resolved due to the hostname file and loopback. The second and third should go to the router for resolution.



      From C



      > ping portal
      ping portal.local (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
      > ping portal.local
      ping: portal.local: Name or service not known
      > ping server
      PING server (127.0.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
      > ping server.local
      PING server.local (172.17.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
      > ping test.server.local
      ping: test.server.local: Name or service not known
      > ifconfig docker0
      docker0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
      inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 172.17.255.255


      As you can see,



      • portal hostname is resolved but including the domain results in unknown service

      • server is resolved by loopback interface. Good

      • server.local for some reason points to docker network interface

      • test.server.local can't be resolved because it never gets to my router

      I understand that the docker0 interface is setup as the default network for containers to join when no network is explicitly set. What I don't understand is why this network is handling resolution or at least not forwarding resolution on to my router when it can't resolve it.







      networking server 18.04 dns docker






      share|improve this question














      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jun 15 at 3:12









      Matt RMatt R

      1011 bronze badge




      1011 bronze badge























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );














          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1151192%2fdocker-network-adapter-hijacking-hostname-resolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown


























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1151192%2fdocker-network-adapter-hijacking-hostname-resolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown









          Popular posts from this blog

          Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

          Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

          Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?