If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?Why does the Moon stablize Earth's axis?Why does this graph for sunlight intensity on land has a steeper slope during sunrise as compared to sunset?Where exactly does the Moon flip, given that it appears the other way up in the other hemisphere?How can one explain the apparent motion of the Sun from a heliocentric point of view?Is the Earth Really Spinning? (honest question)Which constellation would appear to revolve around Denab,Vega or Thuban when axis of the earth would point toward them?Altitude of Midnight Satellite?Does Polaris have a trail in the sky timelapse?What is the highest angle the moon ever makes above the horizon at the North Pole?Did the Moon ever approximate a geosynchronous orbit above the early Earth?Why is the equinoxes only 2 days and not more?
R or Cpp for some finance work involved complex numbers?
How to handle shared mortgage payment if one person can't pay their share?
How can my hammerspace safely "decompress"?
Do you say "good game" after a game in which your opponent played poorly?
Is a light year a different distance if measured from a moving object?
Why does 1.1.1.1 not resolve archive.is?
Are There 3D Rules for Flying and Distance?
algebra permutations
Why are seats at the rear of a plane sometimes unavailable even though many other seats are available in the plane?
What is the type of this light bulb?
What is the word for things that work even when they aren't working (e.g. escalators)?
Why are KDFs slow? Is using a KDF more secure than using the original secret?
How can demon technology be prevented from surpassing humans?
Having trouble with accidentals - Note-for-note vs traditional?
Why is coffee provided during big chess events when it contains a banned substance?
Does my code handle negative numbers or zero when summing squared digits?
What is the purpose of the redundant "いい人" in this example sentence
Variable fixing based on a good feasible solution
Connect Mac CD drive to another Mac
"Shake your head all you like" meaning
Self organizing bonuses?
Can detect magic sense magic items inside a bag of holding?
Is the value of a probability density function for a given input a point, a range, or both?
How honest to be with US immigration about uncertainty about travel plans?
If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?
Why does the Moon stablize Earth's axis?Why does this graph for sunlight intensity on land has a steeper slope during sunrise as compared to sunset?Where exactly does the Moon flip, given that it appears the other way up in the other hemisphere?How can one explain the apparent motion of the Sun from a heliocentric point of view?Is the Earth Really Spinning? (honest question)Which constellation would appear to revolve around Denab,Vega or Thuban when axis of the earth would point toward them?Altitude of Midnight Satellite?Does Polaris have a trail in the sky timelapse?What is the highest angle the moon ever makes above the horizon at the North Pole?Did the Moon ever approximate a geosynchronous orbit above the early Earth?Why is the equinoxes only 2 days and not more?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
$begingroup$
Why is Polaris, the North Star, always above (or near) the North Pole? If Earth is tilted, Polaris' path should be in winter 23 degrees away from its path in summer, or not?
observational-astronomy earth amateur-observing fundamental-astronomy
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Why is Polaris, the North Star, always above (or near) the North Pole? If Earth is tilted, Polaris' path should be in winter 23 degrees away from its path in summer, or not?
observational-astronomy earth amateur-observing fundamental-astronomy
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Don't forget distance. Is the only point of difference as compared to the situation involving sun.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Apr 29 at 7:34
$begingroup$
I hope this doesn't confuse the issue, but it should be noted that Polaris isn't precisely in the same location, even over the course of a day. As wikipedia explains: "In 2018 Polaris is 0.66° away from the pole of rotation ... and so revolves around the pole in a small circle 1.3° in diameter." But we can imagine a "true" pole star that would be precisely still, in which case the question stands.
$endgroup$
– Mike
May 1 at 19:26
$begingroup$
Remember, the seasons are different in each hemisphere (they are caused by the hemisphere being faced more towards or away from the sun at different times during the orbit).
$endgroup$
– benjimin
May 3 at 3:51
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Why is Polaris, the North Star, always above (or near) the North Pole? If Earth is tilted, Polaris' path should be in winter 23 degrees away from its path in summer, or not?
observational-astronomy earth amateur-observing fundamental-astronomy
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
$endgroup$
Why is Polaris, the North Star, always above (or near) the North Pole? If Earth is tilted, Polaris' path should be in winter 23 degrees away from its path in summer, or not?
observational-astronomy earth amateur-observing fundamental-astronomy
observational-astronomy earth amateur-observing fundamental-astronomy
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
edited Apr 28 at 17:03
Guest55
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
asked Apr 28 at 16:46
Guest55Guest55
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
2361 gold badge2 silver badges5 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Don't forget distance. Is the only point of difference as compared to the situation involving sun.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Apr 29 at 7:34
$begingroup$
I hope this doesn't confuse the issue, but it should be noted that Polaris isn't precisely in the same location, even over the course of a day. As wikipedia explains: "In 2018 Polaris is 0.66° away from the pole of rotation ... and so revolves around the pole in a small circle 1.3° in diameter." But we can imagine a "true" pole star that would be precisely still, in which case the question stands.
$endgroup$
– Mike
May 1 at 19:26
$begingroup$
Remember, the seasons are different in each hemisphere (they are caused by the hemisphere being faced more towards or away from the sun at different times during the orbit).
$endgroup$
– benjimin
May 3 at 3:51
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Don't forget distance. Is the only point of difference as compared to the situation involving sun.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Apr 29 at 7:34
$begingroup$
I hope this doesn't confuse the issue, but it should be noted that Polaris isn't precisely in the same location, even over the course of a day. As wikipedia explains: "In 2018 Polaris is 0.66° away from the pole of rotation ... and so revolves around the pole in a small circle 1.3° in diameter." But we can imagine a "true" pole star that would be precisely still, in which case the question stands.
$endgroup$
– Mike
May 1 at 19:26
$begingroup$
Remember, the seasons are different in each hemisphere (they are caused by the hemisphere being faced more towards or away from the sun at different times during the orbit).
$endgroup$
– benjimin
May 3 at 3:51
$begingroup$
Don't forget distance. Is the only point of difference as compared to the situation involving sun.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Apr 29 at 7:34
$begingroup$
Don't forget distance. Is the only point of difference as compared to the situation involving sun.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Apr 29 at 7:34
$begingroup$
I hope this doesn't confuse the issue, but it should be noted that Polaris isn't precisely in the same location, even over the course of a day. As wikipedia explains: "In 2018 Polaris is 0.66° away from the pole of rotation ... and so revolves around the pole in a small circle 1.3° in diameter." But we can imagine a "true" pole star that would be precisely still, in which case the question stands.
$endgroup$
– Mike
May 1 at 19:26
$begingroup$
I hope this doesn't confuse the issue, but it should be noted that Polaris isn't precisely in the same location, even over the course of a day. As wikipedia explains: "In 2018 Polaris is 0.66° away from the pole of rotation ... and so revolves around the pole in a small circle 1.3° in diameter." But we can imagine a "true" pole star that would be precisely still, in which case the question stands.
$endgroup$
– Mike
May 1 at 19:26
$begingroup$
Remember, the seasons are different in each hemisphere (they are caused by the hemisphere being faced more towards or away from the sun at different times during the orbit).
$endgroup$
– benjimin
May 3 at 3:51
$begingroup$
Remember, the seasons are different in each hemisphere (they are caused by the hemisphere being faced more towards or away from the sun at different times during the orbit).
$endgroup$
– benjimin
May 3 at 3:51
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are correct that the axis of the Earth's rotation is tilted with respect to the plane of its orbit by 23 degrees. But it is incorrect that the direction that the axis points changes by a large amount (it should be 2*23 degrees) over a 6 month time span.
Your assumption: If axis it pointed at Polaris at (1), then it should be pointed at a different star at (2).
The axis remains pointed in the same direction throughout the entire year because the laws of physics are that the axis of a spinning object remains pointed in the same direction unless a torque acts on the body to change its orientation. There are torques acting on the Earth (namely the Sun and Moon), but it takes 13000 years to change the direction from "one way to the opposite way", not 6 months.
Correct: The orientation of the Earth's spin axis remains pointed at the same star throughout the year (ignoring the slow, 26000 year precession cycle).
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! Now I understand why the stars are seen on the same paths.
$endgroup$
– Guest55
Apr 28 at 17:49
40
$begingroup$
And also to note that if the axis changed in only 6 months, we would be perpetually stuck in the same seasons.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Apr 29 at 6:19
5
$begingroup$
For further reading on the "ignoring" bit: over thousands of years the pole star does change; see axial precession.
$endgroup$
– gerrit
Apr 29 at 8:06
$begingroup$
@gerrit interesting article on The Long Now about axial precession and the calendar installation at the Hoover Dam: blog.longnow.org/02019/01/29/…
$endgroup$
– rbrtl
Apr 29 at 13:50
12
$begingroup$
Give my regards to your graphic designer. Top notch work there.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
Apr 29 at 15:54
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You may hear about something called the celestial sphere. While we now know the Earth is rotating on its axis, to ancient people it appeared as though the stars were rotating around us (and they are according to our own frame of reference). This rotating globe of stars can itself be mapped on a globe in the same fashion that we can map the Earth's land and water.
There are a few reasons why Polaris is always seen in the same position on this celestial sphere.
- As the globe of the Earth and the celestial sphere rotate relative to each other, they share an axis. This center of rotation does not move.
- While some planets (like Mars) rotate on an axis that is itself wobbling relative to the ecliptic, Earth has a stable axis thanks to our large moon. This axis always points in the same direction and so it's always aligned with the same stars in our galaxy.
- The stars in our galaxy are orbiting the galactic center very slowly from our perspective, so human civilization would not have observed any significant change in the stars' positions across its lifetime.
- During the Earth's orbit around the Sun, its own change in position is so slight relative to the galactic scale that no significant stellar parallax can be expected.
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Kick (or toss) an AFL/rugby football (a prolate spheroid) so that it spins rapidly (around its long axis) at the same as it traverses an arc (falling under gravity). You should be able to observe that the spin axis is parallel transported (at least if the perturbation by air resistance is weak enough to neglect).
The earth is spinning. To change the direction it spins in (with respect to the inertial frame of distant stars) it would be necessary to apply some torque to the earth. A sun's gravity does not apply any torque to a spherical planet (due to the symmetries of the Newtonian forces applied).
Since the earth is not quite a perfect sphere (e.g. is slightly oblate) there is a small torque applied by the sun's gravitational field gradient, so over millennia the planet's north axis gradually precesses to point toward different constellations.
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "514"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31678%2fif-earth-is-tilted-why-is-polaris-always-above-the-same-spot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are correct that the axis of the Earth's rotation is tilted with respect to the plane of its orbit by 23 degrees. But it is incorrect that the direction that the axis points changes by a large amount (it should be 2*23 degrees) over a 6 month time span.
Your assumption: If axis it pointed at Polaris at (1), then it should be pointed at a different star at (2).
The axis remains pointed in the same direction throughout the entire year because the laws of physics are that the axis of a spinning object remains pointed in the same direction unless a torque acts on the body to change its orientation. There are torques acting on the Earth (namely the Sun and Moon), but it takes 13000 years to change the direction from "one way to the opposite way", not 6 months.
Correct: The orientation of the Earth's spin axis remains pointed at the same star throughout the year (ignoring the slow, 26000 year precession cycle).
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! Now I understand why the stars are seen on the same paths.
$endgroup$
– Guest55
Apr 28 at 17:49
40
$begingroup$
And also to note that if the axis changed in only 6 months, we would be perpetually stuck in the same seasons.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Apr 29 at 6:19
5
$begingroup$
For further reading on the "ignoring" bit: over thousands of years the pole star does change; see axial precession.
$endgroup$
– gerrit
Apr 29 at 8:06
$begingroup$
@gerrit interesting article on The Long Now about axial precession and the calendar installation at the Hoover Dam: blog.longnow.org/02019/01/29/…
$endgroup$
– rbrtl
Apr 29 at 13:50
12
$begingroup$
Give my regards to your graphic designer. Top notch work there.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
Apr 29 at 15:54
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You are correct that the axis of the Earth's rotation is tilted with respect to the plane of its orbit by 23 degrees. But it is incorrect that the direction that the axis points changes by a large amount (it should be 2*23 degrees) over a 6 month time span.
Your assumption: If axis it pointed at Polaris at (1), then it should be pointed at a different star at (2).
The axis remains pointed in the same direction throughout the entire year because the laws of physics are that the axis of a spinning object remains pointed in the same direction unless a torque acts on the body to change its orientation. There are torques acting on the Earth (namely the Sun and Moon), but it takes 13000 years to change the direction from "one way to the opposite way", not 6 months.
Correct: The orientation of the Earth's spin axis remains pointed at the same star throughout the year (ignoring the slow, 26000 year precession cycle).
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! Now I understand why the stars are seen on the same paths.
$endgroup$
– Guest55
Apr 28 at 17:49
40
$begingroup$
And also to note that if the axis changed in only 6 months, we would be perpetually stuck in the same seasons.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Apr 29 at 6:19
5
$begingroup$
For further reading on the "ignoring" bit: over thousands of years the pole star does change; see axial precession.
$endgroup$
– gerrit
Apr 29 at 8:06
$begingroup$
@gerrit interesting article on The Long Now about axial precession and the calendar installation at the Hoover Dam: blog.longnow.org/02019/01/29/…
$endgroup$
– rbrtl
Apr 29 at 13:50
12
$begingroup$
Give my regards to your graphic designer. Top notch work there.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
Apr 29 at 15:54
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You are correct that the axis of the Earth's rotation is tilted with respect to the plane of its orbit by 23 degrees. But it is incorrect that the direction that the axis points changes by a large amount (it should be 2*23 degrees) over a 6 month time span.
Your assumption: If axis it pointed at Polaris at (1), then it should be pointed at a different star at (2).
The axis remains pointed in the same direction throughout the entire year because the laws of physics are that the axis of a spinning object remains pointed in the same direction unless a torque acts on the body to change its orientation. There are torques acting on the Earth (namely the Sun and Moon), but it takes 13000 years to change the direction from "one way to the opposite way", not 6 months.
Correct: The orientation of the Earth's spin axis remains pointed at the same star throughout the year (ignoring the slow, 26000 year precession cycle).
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
You are correct that the axis of the Earth's rotation is tilted with respect to the plane of its orbit by 23 degrees. But it is incorrect that the direction that the axis points changes by a large amount (it should be 2*23 degrees) over a 6 month time span.
Your assumption: If axis it pointed at Polaris at (1), then it should be pointed at a different star at (2).
The axis remains pointed in the same direction throughout the entire year because the laws of physics are that the axis of a spinning object remains pointed in the same direction unless a torque acts on the body to change its orientation. There are torques acting on the Earth (namely the Sun and Moon), but it takes 13000 years to change the direction from "one way to the opposite way", not 6 months.
Correct: The orientation of the Earth's spin axis remains pointed at the same star throughout the year (ignoring the slow, 26000 year precession cycle).
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
edited May 1 at 0:51
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
answered Apr 28 at 17:46
JohnHoltzJohnHoltz
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
3,9412 gold badges11 silver badges15 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! Now I understand why the stars are seen on the same paths.
$endgroup$
– Guest55
Apr 28 at 17:49
40
$begingroup$
And also to note that if the axis changed in only 6 months, we would be perpetually stuck in the same seasons.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Apr 29 at 6:19
5
$begingroup$
For further reading on the "ignoring" bit: over thousands of years the pole star does change; see axial precession.
$endgroup$
– gerrit
Apr 29 at 8:06
$begingroup$
@gerrit interesting article on The Long Now about axial precession and the calendar installation at the Hoover Dam: blog.longnow.org/02019/01/29/…
$endgroup$
– rbrtl
Apr 29 at 13:50
12
$begingroup$
Give my regards to your graphic designer. Top notch work there.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
Apr 29 at 15:54
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! Now I understand why the stars are seen on the same paths.
$endgroup$
– Guest55
Apr 28 at 17:49
40
$begingroup$
And also to note that if the axis changed in only 6 months, we would be perpetually stuck in the same seasons.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Apr 29 at 6:19
5
$begingroup$
For further reading on the "ignoring" bit: over thousands of years the pole star does change; see axial precession.
$endgroup$
– gerrit
Apr 29 at 8:06
$begingroup$
@gerrit interesting article on The Long Now about axial precession and the calendar installation at the Hoover Dam: blog.longnow.org/02019/01/29/…
$endgroup$
– rbrtl
Apr 29 at 13:50
12
$begingroup$
Give my regards to your graphic designer. Top notch work there.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
Apr 29 at 15:54
2
2
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! Now I understand why the stars are seen on the same paths.
$endgroup$
– Guest55
Apr 28 at 17:49
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! Now I understand why the stars are seen on the same paths.
$endgroup$
– Guest55
Apr 28 at 17:49
40
40
$begingroup$
And also to note that if the axis changed in only 6 months, we would be perpetually stuck in the same seasons.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Apr 29 at 6:19
$begingroup$
And also to note that if the axis changed in only 6 months, we would be perpetually stuck in the same seasons.
$endgroup$
– Michael
Apr 29 at 6:19
5
5
$begingroup$
For further reading on the "ignoring" bit: over thousands of years the pole star does change; see axial precession.
$endgroup$
– gerrit
Apr 29 at 8:06
$begingroup$
For further reading on the "ignoring" bit: over thousands of years the pole star does change; see axial precession.
$endgroup$
– gerrit
Apr 29 at 8:06
$begingroup$
@gerrit interesting article on The Long Now about axial precession and the calendar installation at the Hoover Dam: blog.longnow.org/02019/01/29/…
$endgroup$
– rbrtl
Apr 29 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@gerrit interesting article on The Long Now about axial precession and the calendar installation at the Hoover Dam: blog.longnow.org/02019/01/29/…
$endgroup$
– rbrtl
Apr 29 at 13:50
12
12
$begingroup$
Give my regards to your graphic designer. Top notch work there.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
Apr 29 at 15:54
$begingroup$
Give my regards to your graphic designer. Top notch work there.
$endgroup$
– corsiKa
Apr 29 at 15:54
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You may hear about something called the celestial sphere. While we now know the Earth is rotating on its axis, to ancient people it appeared as though the stars were rotating around us (and they are according to our own frame of reference). This rotating globe of stars can itself be mapped on a globe in the same fashion that we can map the Earth's land and water.
There are a few reasons why Polaris is always seen in the same position on this celestial sphere.
- As the globe of the Earth and the celestial sphere rotate relative to each other, they share an axis. This center of rotation does not move.
- While some planets (like Mars) rotate on an axis that is itself wobbling relative to the ecliptic, Earth has a stable axis thanks to our large moon. This axis always points in the same direction and so it's always aligned with the same stars in our galaxy.
- The stars in our galaxy are orbiting the galactic center very slowly from our perspective, so human civilization would not have observed any significant change in the stars' positions across its lifetime.
- During the Earth's orbit around the Sun, its own change in position is so slight relative to the galactic scale that no significant stellar parallax can be expected.
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You may hear about something called the celestial sphere. While we now know the Earth is rotating on its axis, to ancient people it appeared as though the stars were rotating around us (and they are according to our own frame of reference). This rotating globe of stars can itself be mapped on a globe in the same fashion that we can map the Earth's land and water.
There are a few reasons why Polaris is always seen in the same position on this celestial sphere.
- As the globe of the Earth and the celestial sphere rotate relative to each other, they share an axis. This center of rotation does not move.
- While some planets (like Mars) rotate on an axis that is itself wobbling relative to the ecliptic, Earth has a stable axis thanks to our large moon. This axis always points in the same direction and so it's always aligned with the same stars in our galaxy.
- The stars in our galaxy are orbiting the galactic center very slowly from our perspective, so human civilization would not have observed any significant change in the stars' positions across its lifetime.
- During the Earth's orbit around the Sun, its own change in position is so slight relative to the galactic scale that no significant stellar parallax can be expected.
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You may hear about something called the celestial sphere. While we now know the Earth is rotating on its axis, to ancient people it appeared as though the stars were rotating around us (and they are according to our own frame of reference). This rotating globe of stars can itself be mapped on a globe in the same fashion that we can map the Earth's land and water.
There are a few reasons why Polaris is always seen in the same position on this celestial sphere.
- As the globe of the Earth and the celestial sphere rotate relative to each other, they share an axis. This center of rotation does not move.
- While some planets (like Mars) rotate on an axis that is itself wobbling relative to the ecliptic, Earth has a stable axis thanks to our large moon. This axis always points in the same direction and so it's always aligned with the same stars in our galaxy.
- The stars in our galaxy are orbiting the galactic center very slowly from our perspective, so human civilization would not have observed any significant change in the stars' positions across its lifetime.
- During the Earth's orbit around the Sun, its own change in position is so slight relative to the galactic scale that no significant stellar parallax can be expected.
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
$endgroup$
You may hear about something called the celestial sphere. While we now know the Earth is rotating on its axis, to ancient people it appeared as though the stars were rotating around us (and they are according to our own frame of reference). This rotating globe of stars can itself be mapped on a globe in the same fashion that we can map the Earth's land and water.
There are a few reasons why Polaris is always seen in the same position on this celestial sphere.
- As the globe of the Earth and the celestial sphere rotate relative to each other, they share an axis. This center of rotation does not move.
- While some planets (like Mars) rotate on an axis that is itself wobbling relative to the ecliptic, Earth has a stable axis thanks to our large moon. This axis always points in the same direction and so it's always aligned with the same stars in our galaxy.
- The stars in our galaxy are orbiting the galactic center very slowly from our perspective, so human civilization would not have observed any significant change in the stars' positions across its lifetime.
- During the Earth's orbit around the Sun, its own change in position is so slight relative to the galactic scale that no significant stellar parallax can be expected.
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
edited Apr 30 at 16:25
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
answered Apr 29 at 21:00
Kyle DelaneyKyle Delaney
1513 bronze badges
1513 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Kick (or toss) an AFL/rugby football (a prolate spheroid) so that it spins rapidly (around its long axis) at the same as it traverses an arc (falling under gravity). You should be able to observe that the spin axis is parallel transported (at least if the perturbation by air resistance is weak enough to neglect).
The earth is spinning. To change the direction it spins in (with respect to the inertial frame of distant stars) it would be necessary to apply some torque to the earth. A sun's gravity does not apply any torque to a spherical planet (due to the symmetries of the Newtonian forces applied).
Since the earth is not quite a perfect sphere (e.g. is slightly oblate) there is a small torque applied by the sun's gravitational field gradient, so over millennia the planet's north axis gradually precesses to point toward different constellations.
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Kick (or toss) an AFL/rugby football (a prolate spheroid) so that it spins rapidly (around its long axis) at the same as it traverses an arc (falling under gravity). You should be able to observe that the spin axis is parallel transported (at least if the perturbation by air resistance is weak enough to neglect).
The earth is spinning. To change the direction it spins in (with respect to the inertial frame of distant stars) it would be necessary to apply some torque to the earth. A sun's gravity does not apply any torque to a spherical planet (due to the symmetries of the Newtonian forces applied).
Since the earth is not quite a perfect sphere (e.g. is slightly oblate) there is a small torque applied by the sun's gravitational field gradient, so over millennia the planet's north axis gradually precesses to point toward different constellations.
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Kick (or toss) an AFL/rugby football (a prolate spheroid) so that it spins rapidly (around its long axis) at the same as it traverses an arc (falling under gravity). You should be able to observe that the spin axis is parallel transported (at least if the perturbation by air resistance is weak enough to neglect).
The earth is spinning. To change the direction it spins in (with respect to the inertial frame of distant stars) it would be necessary to apply some torque to the earth. A sun's gravity does not apply any torque to a spherical planet (due to the symmetries of the Newtonian forces applied).
Since the earth is not quite a perfect sphere (e.g. is slightly oblate) there is a small torque applied by the sun's gravitational field gradient, so over millennia the planet's north axis gradually precesses to point toward different constellations.
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
$endgroup$
Kick (or toss) an AFL/rugby football (a prolate spheroid) so that it spins rapidly (around its long axis) at the same as it traverses an arc (falling under gravity). You should be able to observe that the spin axis is parallel transported (at least if the perturbation by air resistance is weak enough to neglect).
The earth is spinning. To change the direction it spins in (with respect to the inertial frame of distant stars) it would be necessary to apply some torque to the earth. A sun's gravity does not apply any torque to a spherical planet (due to the symmetries of the Newtonian forces applied).
Since the earth is not quite a perfect sphere (e.g. is slightly oblate) there is a small torque applied by the sun's gravitational field gradient, so over millennia the planet's north axis gradually precesses to point toward different constellations.
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
answered Apr 30 at 1:09
benjiminbenjimin
1411 bronze badge
1411 bronze badge
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31678%2fif-earth-is-tilted-why-is-polaris-always-above-the-same-spot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Don't forget distance. Is the only point of difference as compared to the situation involving sun.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Apr 29 at 7:34
$begingroup$
I hope this doesn't confuse the issue, but it should be noted that Polaris isn't precisely in the same location, even over the course of a day. As wikipedia explains: "In 2018 Polaris is 0.66° away from the pole of rotation ... and so revolves around the pole in a small circle 1.3° in diameter." But we can imagine a "true" pole star that would be precisely still, in which case the question stands.
$endgroup$
– Mike
May 1 at 19:26
$begingroup$
Remember, the seasons are different in each hemisphere (they are caused by the hemisphere being faced more towards or away from the sun at different times during the orbit).
$endgroup$
– benjimin
May 3 at 3:51