Was the ancestor of SCSI, the SASI protocol, nothing more than a draft?How can I take an image of a 50-pin SCSI hard-driveClonezilla SCSI HDD cloning problemApple II SCSI: Maximum drive / partition size?What were practical uses of SCSI floppy drives?Using floppy disk interface on Future Domain TMC-1680 SCSI ISA cardWhat is the best way to connect an old Tandberg QIC tape drive using today's computers?What's the pitfalls when trying to connect a new SCSI hard drive to an old SCSI bus?What is the maximum voltage of high voltage differential SCSI?Old SCSI controller won't boot on certain PC
Why does 1.1.1.1 not resolve archive.is?
Why are KDFs slow? Is using a KDF more secure than using the original secret?
How can AnyDVD destroy a DVD drive?
Why (come) instead of (go)?
"Dear Stack Exchange, I am very disappointed in you" - How to construct a strong opening line in a letter?
How to respond when insulted by a grad student in a different department?
Is the value of a probability density function for a given input a point, a range, or both?
Fill a bowl with alphabet soup
Conflict between titlesec package and scrbook class after most recent update of TeXLive2019
'The Kukhtarev's model' or 'Kukhtarev's model' ('John's car' or 'The John's car')?
Can migraine attacks be predicted by any means?
Is it possible to cross Arctic Ocean on ski/kayak undetectable now?
Is it plausible that an interrupted Windows update can cause the motherboard to fail?
What's the most efficient way to draw this region?
I didn't do any exit passport control when leaving Japan. What should I do?
Drawing Super Mario Bros.....in LaTeX
How can my hammerspace safely "decompress"?
First aid scissors confiscated by Dubai airport security
Trek Madone SLR Di2
What is the fastest algorithm for finding the natural logarithm of a big number?
Diamondize Some Text
How to make a PCB based on ATtiny easily updatable by end users?
Proofreading a novel: is it okay to use a question mark with an exclamation mark - "?!"
Can the bass be used instead of drums?
Was the ancestor of SCSI, the SASI protocol, nothing more than a draft?
How can I take an image of a 50-pin SCSI hard-driveClonezilla SCSI HDD cloning problemApple II SCSI: Maximum drive / partition size?What were practical uses of SCSI floppy drives?Using floppy disk interface on Future Domain TMC-1680 SCSI ISA cardWhat is the best way to connect an old Tandberg QIC tape drive using today's computers?What's the pitfalls when trying to connect a new SCSI hard drive to an old SCSI bus?What is the maximum voltage of high voltage differential SCSI?Old SCSI controller won't boot on certain PC
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I recently discovered that the SCSI protocol was, in fact, an improvement on the SASI protocol, which apparently predates SCSI by only a couple of years, appearing in 1978 (but only publicly in 1981). It was only shortly after, in 1982, that the SCSI protocol appeared.
That makes me wonder whether SASI was commercially successful.
What was the popularity, if any, of the SASI protocol?
scsi
add a comment
|
I recently discovered that the SCSI protocol was, in fact, an improvement on the SASI protocol, which apparently predates SCSI by only a couple of years, appearing in 1978 (but only publicly in 1981). It was only shortly after, in 1982, that the SCSI protocol appeared.
That makes me wonder whether SASI was commercially successful.
What was the popularity, if any, of the SASI protocol?
scsi
"Popularity"? - Does that mean percentage of makes of hard drives at one point in time (nearly 100% for a certain time range) or absolute numbers (really low)?
– tofro
Apr 30 at 7:03
I would say on average, like if the product seems appealing to consumers then one company considers producing it in non negligible quantities, hence the term popular.
– Aybe
Apr 30 at 7:20
add a comment
|
I recently discovered that the SCSI protocol was, in fact, an improvement on the SASI protocol, which apparently predates SCSI by only a couple of years, appearing in 1978 (but only publicly in 1981). It was only shortly after, in 1982, that the SCSI protocol appeared.
That makes me wonder whether SASI was commercially successful.
What was the popularity, if any, of the SASI protocol?
scsi
I recently discovered that the SCSI protocol was, in fact, an improvement on the SASI protocol, which apparently predates SCSI by only a couple of years, appearing in 1978 (but only publicly in 1981). It was only shortly after, in 1982, that the SCSI protocol appeared.
That makes me wonder whether SASI was commercially successful.
What was the popularity, if any, of the SASI protocol?
scsi
scsi
edited Apr 29 at 20:21
Aybe
asked Apr 29 at 7:35
AybeAybe
1,9682 gold badges11 silver badges30 bronze badges
1,9682 gold badges11 silver badges30 bronze badges
"Popularity"? - Does that mean percentage of makes of hard drives at one point in time (nearly 100% for a certain time range) or absolute numbers (really low)?
– tofro
Apr 30 at 7:03
I would say on average, like if the product seems appealing to consumers then one company considers producing it in non negligible quantities, hence the term popular.
– Aybe
Apr 30 at 7:20
add a comment
|
"Popularity"? - Does that mean percentage of makes of hard drives at one point in time (nearly 100% for a certain time range) or absolute numbers (really low)?
– tofro
Apr 30 at 7:03
I would say on average, like if the product seems appealing to consumers then one company considers producing it in non negligible quantities, hence the term popular.
– Aybe
Apr 30 at 7:20
"Popularity"? - Does that mean percentage of makes of hard drives at one point in time (nearly 100% for a certain time range) or absolute numbers (really low)?
– tofro
Apr 30 at 7:03
"Popularity"? - Does that mean percentage of makes of hard drives at one point in time (nearly 100% for a certain time range) or absolute numbers (really low)?
– tofro
Apr 30 at 7:03
I would say on average, like if the product seems appealing to consumers then one company considers producing it in non negligible quantities, hence the term popular.
– Aybe
Apr 30 at 7:20
I would say on average, like if the product seems appealing to consumers then one company considers producing it in non negligible quantities, hence the term popular.
– Aybe
Apr 30 at 7:20
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Some parts of SASI were used in the Atari ST family’s ACSI system, in particular for hard drives connected to that interface — see Application Notes on the Atari Computer System Interface for details. Whether that counts as “popular” depends on your interpretation and the markets you’re interested in.
SASI controllers and hard drives were used in minis too, and at least available for many early micros, and SCSI-1 was designed to be backwards-compatible with it and many SASI controllers were compatible with SCSI-1.
add a comment
|
The SASI protocol, if anything, was used by "The Sider" hard drive for the Apple II series of computers. Though hard drives on the Apple II weren't very common, it wasn't until 1985 that "The Sider" appeared and was considerably less expensive than its predecessors and as a result became rather popular in the Apple II community.
That being said, The Sider was based on the Xebec controller which was SASI before the Sider appeared, so production numbers would certainly exceed the Apple numbers.
I'm not aware of other commercial implementations of SASI, but from the Xebec sales alone it would qualify as somewhat successful if anything.
add a comment
|
The point is: When SASI was en vogue (and that was only a very short timeframe, because technology was soon superseded with SCSI and the simpler ST506 and later ATA standards), hard disks weren't very popular for low and mid-range computers.
If you look at early hard disks, for a short time (a time frame of maybe 2-3 years in the early 1980s) SASI was the only relevant standard, so market share must have been close to 100%.
Development of early hard disk interfaces for small computers was simply so short that technology developed much faster than standards could really establish themselves in the market.
Some relatively popular computers like the Sharp XC60000 and the Commodore early hard drives for the PET (D9090 and similar) used SASI hard disks.
Note that the change from SASI to SCSI was only a name change, there were no technical changes applied to the interface - So starting in 1981, SCSI and SASI were effectively the same thing, just with a standardized name. Seen from this end, SASI was actually very popular, just under a standardized name that removed "Shugart Associates" from the abbreviation.
Wikipedia knows the following:
Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface"
However, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck.
I've read that SCSI-1 varied slightly from SASI, but for the most part they were still compatible. My only SASI drive died before I ever attempted to plug it into a SCSI controller (with the intent of doing a 'dd' dump), but from what I researched I should have been able to perform the operation.
– bjb
Apr 30 at 12:26
3
SCSI was SASI when it was standardized in 1986. ANSI simply couldn't publish standard that had a vendor name in it. The name change was initiated in 1982: Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface;"however, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck (Wikip)
– tofro
Apr 30 at 14:20
add a comment
|
Japan.
In Japan, the SASI interface is relatively widely used. We can recall the NEC PC-98 and Sharp X68000 families, as well as less common systems.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f10900%2fwas-the-ancestor-of-scsi-the-sasi-protocol-nothing-more-than-a-draft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Some parts of SASI were used in the Atari ST family’s ACSI system, in particular for hard drives connected to that interface — see Application Notes on the Atari Computer System Interface for details. Whether that counts as “popular” depends on your interpretation and the markets you’re interested in.
SASI controllers and hard drives were used in minis too, and at least available for many early micros, and SCSI-1 was designed to be backwards-compatible with it and many SASI controllers were compatible with SCSI-1.
add a comment
|
Some parts of SASI were used in the Atari ST family’s ACSI system, in particular for hard drives connected to that interface — see Application Notes on the Atari Computer System Interface for details. Whether that counts as “popular” depends on your interpretation and the markets you’re interested in.
SASI controllers and hard drives were used in minis too, and at least available for many early micros, and SCSI-1 was designed to be backwards-compatible with it and many SASI controllers were compatible with SCSI-1.
add a comment
|
Some parts of SASI were used in the Atari ST family’s ACSI system, in particular for hard drives connected to that interface — see Application Notes on the Atari Computer System Interface for details. Whether that counts as “popular” depends on your interpretation and the markets you’re interested in.
SASI controllers and hard drives were used in minis too, and at least available for many early micros, and SCSI-1 was designed to be backwards-compatible with it and many SASI controllers were compatible with SCSI-1.
Some parts of SASI were used in the Atari ST family’s ACSI system, in particular for hard drives connected to that interface — see Application Notes on the Atari Computer System Interface for details. Whether that counts as “popular” depends on your interpretation and the markets you’re interested in.
SASI controllers and hard drives were used in minis too, and at least available for many early micros, and SCSI-1 was designed to be backwards-compatible with it and many SASI controllers were compatible with SCSI-1.
edited Apr 29 at 9:49
answered Apr 29 at 9:06
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
50.8k9 gold badges208 silver badges213 bronze badges
50.8k9 gold badges208 silver badges213 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
The SASI protocol, if anything, was used by "The Sider" hard drive for the Apple II series of computers. Though hard drives on the Apple II weren't very common, it wasn't until 1985 that "The Sider" appeared and was considerably less expensive than its predecessors and as a result became rather popular in the Apple II community.
That being said, The Sider was based on the Xebec controller which was SASI before the Sider appeared, so production numbers would certainly exceed the Apple numbers.
I'm not aware of other commercial implementations of SASI, but from the Xebec sales alone it would qualify as somewhat successful if anything.
add a comment
|
The SASI protocol, if anything, was used by "The Sider" hard drive for the Apple II series of computers. Though hard drives on the Apple II weren't very common, it wasn't until 1985 that "The Sider" appeared and was considerably less expensive than its predecessors and as a result became rather popular in the Apple II community.
That being said, The Sider was based on the Xebec controller which was SASI before the Sider appeared, so production numbers would certainly exceed the Apple numbers.
I'm not aware of other commercial implementations of SASI, but from the Xebec sales alone it would qualify as somewhat successful if anything.
add a comment
|
The SASI protocol, if anything, was used by "The Sider" hard drive for the Apple II series of computers. Though hard drives on the Apple II weren't very common, it wasn't until 1985 that "The Sider" appeared and was considerably less expensive than its predecessors and as a result became rather popular in the Apple II community.
That being said, The Sider was based on the Xebec controller which was SASI before the Sider appeared, so production numbers would certainly exceed the Apple numbers.
I'm not aware of other commercial implementations of SASI, but from the Xebec sales alone it would qualify as somewhat successful if anything.
The SASI protocol, if anything, was used by "The Sider" hard drive for the Apple II series of computers. Though hard drives on the Apple II weren't very common, it wasn't until 1985 that "The Sider" appeared and was considerably less expensive than its predecessors and as a result became rather popular in the Apple II community.
That being said, The Sider was based on the Xebec controller which was SASI before the Sider appeared, so production numbers would certainly exceed the Apple numbers.
I'm not aware of other commercial implementations of SASI, but from the Xebec sales alone it would qualify as somewhat successful if anything.
answered Apr 29 at 16:51
bjbbjb
6,41919 silver badges77 bronze badges
6,41919 silver badges77 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
The point is: When SASI was en vogue (and that was only a very short timeframe, because technology was soon superseded with SCSI and the simpler ST506 and later ATA standards), hard disks weren't very popular for low and mid-range computers.
If you look at early hard disks, for a short time (a time frame of maybe 2-3 years in the early 1980s) SASI was the only relevant standard, so market share must have been close to 100%.
Development of early hard disk interfaces for small computers was simply so short that technology developed much faster than standards could really establish themselves in the market.
Some relatively popular computers like the Sharp XC60000 and the Commodore early hard drives for the PET (D9090 and similar) used SASI hard disks.
Note that the change from SASI to SCSI was only a name change, there were no technical changes applied to the interface - So starting in 1981, SCSI and SASI were effectively the same thing, just with a standardized name. Seen from this end, SASI was actually very popular, just under a standardized name that removed "Shugart Associates" from the abbreviation.
Wikipedia knows the following:
Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface"
However, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck.
I've read that SCSI-1 varied slightly from SASI, but for the most part they were still compatible. My only SASI drive died before I ever attempted to plug it into a SCSI controller (with the intent of doing a 'dd' dump), but from what I researched I should have been able to perform the operation.
– bjb
Apr 30 at 12:26
3
SCSI was SASI when it was standardized in 1986. ANSI simply couldn't publish standard that had a vendor name in it. The name change was initiated in 1982: Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface;"however, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck (Wikip)
– tofro
Apr 30 at 14:20
add a comment
|
The point is: When SASI was en vogue (and that was only a very short timeframe, because technology was soon superseded with SCSI and the simpler ST506 and later ATA standards), hard disks weren't very popular for low and mid-range computers.
If you look at early hard disks, for a short time (a time frame of maybe 2-3 years in the early 1980s) SASI was the only relevant standard, so market share must have been close to 100%.
Development of early hard disk interfaces for small computers was simply so short that technology developed much faster than standards could really establish themselves in the market.
Some relatively popular computers like the Sharp XC60000 and the Commodore early hard drives for the PET (D9090 and similar) used SASI hard disks.
Note that the change from SASI to SCSI was only a name change, there were no technical changes applied to the interface - So starting in 1981, SCSI and SASI were effectively the same thing, just with a standardized name. Seen from this end, SASI was actually very popular, just under a standardized name that removed "Shugart Associates" from the abbreviation.
Wikipedia knows the following:
Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface"
However, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck.
I've read that SCSI-1 varied slightly from SASI, but for the most part they were still compatible. My only SASI drive died before I ever attempted to plug it into a SCSI controller (with the intent of doing a 'dd' dump), but from what I researched I should have been able to perform the operation.
– bjb
Apr 30 at 12:26
3
SCSI was SASI when it was standardized in 1986. ANSI simply couldn't publish standard that had a vendor name in it. The name change was initiated in 1982: Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface;"however, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck (Wikip)
– tofro
Apr 30 at 14:20
add a comment
|
The point is: When SASI was en vogue (and that was only a very short timeframe, because technology was soon superseded with SCSI and the simpler ST506 and later ATA standards), hard disks weren't very popular for low and mid-range computers.
If you look at early hard disks, for a short time (a time frame of maybe 2-3 years in the early 1980s) SASI was the only relevant standard, so market share must have been close to 100%.
Development of early hard disk interfaces for small computers was simply so short that technology developed much faster than standards could really establish themselves in the market.
Some relatively popular computers like the Sharp XC60000 and the Commodore early hard drives for the PET (D9090 and similar) used SASI hard disks.
Note that the change from SASI to SCSI was only a name change, there were no technical changes applied to the interface - So starting in 1981, SCSI and SASI were effectively the same thing, just with a standardized name. Seen from this end, SASI was actually very popular, just under a standardized name that removed "Shugart Associates" from the abbreviation.
Wikipedia knows the following:
Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface"
However, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck.
The point is: When SASI was en vogue (and that was only a very short timeframe, because technology was soon superseded with SCSI and the simpler ST506 and later ATA standards), hard disks weren't very popular for low and mid-range computers.
If you look at early hard disks, for a short time (a time frame of maybe 2-3 years in the early 1980s) SASI was the only relevant standard, so market share must have been close to 100%.
Development of early hard disk interfaces for small computers was simply so short that technology developed much faster than standards could really establish themselves in the market.
Some relatively popular computers like the Sharp XC60000 and the Commodore early hard drives for the PET (D9090 and similar) used SASI hard disks.
Note that the change from SASI to SCSI was only a name change, there were no technical changes applied to the interface - So starting in 1981, SCSI and SASI were effectively the same thing, just with a standardized name. Seen from this end, SASI was actually very popular, just under a standardized name that removed "Shugart Associates" from the abbreviation.
Wikipedia knows the following:
Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface"
However, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck.
edited May 1 at 10:42
answered Apr 30 at 8:34
tofrotofro
18.5k3 gold badges38 silver badges101 bronze badges
18.5k3 gold badges38 silver badges101 bronze badges
I've read that SCSI-1 varied slightly from SASI, but for the most part they were still compatible. My only SASI drive died before I ever attempted to plug it into a SCSI controller (with the intent of doing a 'dd' dump), but from what I researched I should have been able to perform the operation.
– bjb
Apr 30 at 12:26
3
SCSI was SASI when it was standardized in 1986. ANSI simply couldn't publish standard that had a vendor name in it. The name change was initiated in 1982: Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface;"however, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck (Wikip)
– tofro
Apr 30 at 14:20
add a comment
|
I've read that SCSI-1 varied slightly from SASI, but for the most part they were still compatible. My only SASI drive died before I ever attempted to plug it into a SCSI controller (with the intent of doing a 'dd' dump), but from what I researched I should have been able to perform the operation.
– bjb
Apr 30 at 12:26
3
SCSI was SASI when it was standardized in 1986. ANSI simply couldn't publish standard that had a vendor name in it. The name change was initiated in 1982: Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface;"however, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck (Wikip)
– tofro
Apr 30 at 14:20
I've read that SCSI-1 varied slightly from SASI, but for the most part they were still compatible. My only SASI drive died before I ever attempted to plug it into a SCSI controller (with the intent of doing a 'dd' dump), but from what I researched I should have been able to perform the operation.
– bjb
Apr 30 at 12:26
I've read that SCSI-1 varied slightly from SASI, but for the most part they were still compatible. My only SASI drive died before I ever attempted to plug it into a SCSI controller (with the intent of doing a 'dd' dump), but from what I researched I should have been able to perform the operation.
– bjb
Apr 30 at 12:26
3
3
SCSI was SASI when it was standardized in 1986. ANSI simply couldn't publish standard that had a vendor name in it. The name change was initiated in 1982: Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface;"however, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck (Wikip)
– tofro
Apr 30 at 14:20
SCSI was SASI when it was standardized in 1986. ANSI simply couldn't publish standard that had a vendor name in it. The name change was initiated in 1982: Until at least February 1982, ANSI developed the specification as "SASI" and "Shugart Associates System Interface;"however, the committee documenting the standard would not allow it to be named after a company. Almost a full day was devoted to agreeing to name the standard "Small Computer System Interface", which Boucher intended to be pronounced "sexy", but ENDL's Dal Allan pronounced the new acronym as "scuzzy" and that stuck (Wikip)
– tofro
Apr 30 at 14:20
add a comment
|
Japan.
In Japan, the SASI interface is relatively widely used. We can recall the NEC PC-98 and Sharp X68000 families, as well as less common systems.
add a comment
|
Japan.
In Japan, the SASI interface is relatively widely used. We can recall the NEC PC-98 and Sharp X68000 families, as well as less common systems.
add a comment
|
Japan.
In Japan, the SASI interface is relatively widely used. We can recall the NEC PC-98 and Sharp X68000 families, as well as less common systems.
Japan.
In Japan, the SASI interface is relatively widely used. We can recall the NEC PC-98 and Sharp X68000 families, as well as less common systems.
answered May 13 at 4:55
WheelmagisterWheelmagister
4666 bronze badges
4666 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f10900%2fwas-the-ancestor-of-scsi-the-sasi-protocol-nothing-more-than-a-draft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"Popularity"? - Does that mean percentage of makes of hard drives at one point in time (nearly 100% for a certain time range) or absolute numbers (really low)?
– tofro
Apr 30 at 7:03
I would say on average, like if the product seems appealing to consumers then one company considers producing it in non negligible quantities, hence the term popular.
– Aybe
Apr 30 at 7:20