Unconventional OppositesChange a letter, add a letterSix-letter word with four unique vowelsUnusual letter combinationsA Compound word full of wordsIncomplete Word RectangleWord Rectangle #2Unusual letter combinations 2A Fairy Chess Ladder

Term for anticipating counterarguments and rebutting them

How to capture a possible figure of speech with "E se io fossi vago" in translation?

Can a planet's magnetic field be generated by non-ferromagnetic metals?

How does the Gameboy Link Cable work?

How does AT-AT deploy troops?

Is CR12 too difficult for two level 4 characters?

Why is Iceland Air's Saga Premium product classified as Business class?

I am particularly fascinated by the Chinese character that is pronounced SHIN & means faith or belief

Can a trainer send me a gift every day without opening my gift?

What could a technologically advanced but outnumbered alien race do to destroy humanity?

Doubt on finding simplex's initial canonical tableau (II Phase)

Can tankless & conventional water heaters join forces?

What is more proper notation in piano sheet music to denote that the left hand should be louder?

Why are there so many subway station signs between Yau Ma Tei station and Mong Kok station on Google Maps?

Is dark matter inside galaxies different from dark matter in intergalactic space?

How can an immortal member of the nobility be prevented from taking the throne?

Intuition behind the paradox of instantaneous heat propagation

Novel about a woman who is transformed into an elf

Can I still travel on the Troika Card even if it goes into a negative balance?

Why are bagpipes tuned using just intonation?

If a tournament advertises G/30, can either player demand G/25 d5?

Should I do a regression analysis even if the variables do not seem to be associated at all?

Sci-fi book trilogy about space travel & 'jacking'

How are letters between governments being transported and delivered?



Unconventional Opposites


Change a letter, add a letterSix-letter word with four unique vowelsUnusual letter combinationsA Compound word full of wordsIncomplete Word RectangleWord Rectangle #2Unusual letter combinations 2A Fairy Chess Ladder






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








9














$begingroup$


We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?



I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.



All words are English.



  1. N

  2. Li

Hint for #1:




Authority -> non-Authority




Hint for #2:




Known -> unknowing











share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:12

















9














$begingroup$


We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?



I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.



All words are English.



  1. N

  2. Li

Hint for #1:




Authority -> non-Authority




Hint for #2:




Known -> unknowing











share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:12













9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?



I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.



All words are English.



  1. N

  2. Li

Hint for #1:




Authority -> non-Authority




Hint for #2:




Known -> unknowing











share|improve this question












$endgroup$




We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?



I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.



All words are English.



  1. N

  2. Li

Hint for #1:




Authority -> non-Authority




Hint for #2:




Known -> unknowing








word english






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 30 at 13:37







Trenin

















asked May 30 at 12:46









TreninTrenin

8,35817 silver badges49 bronze badges




8,35817 silver badges49 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:12












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:12







1




1




$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 13:12




$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 13:12










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















15
















$begingroup$

I think #2 is




Obvious -> Oblivious




Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:31



















14
















$begingroup$

For #1:




A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).




For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):




Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.




(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)




The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.




Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.







share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it not "li"?
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 30 at 13:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 30 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    Huh, so it is. OK then.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:28










  • $begingroup$
    Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:32


















9
















$begingroup$

This fits for 1.N:




Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed


An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).







share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 14:04







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
    $endgroup$
    – Hellion
    May 30 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 15:05












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84528%2funconventional-opposites%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15
















$begingroup$

I think #2 is




Obvious -> Oblivious




Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:31
















15
















$begingroup$

I think #2 is




Obvious -> Oblivious




Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:31














15














15










15







$begingroup$

I think #2 is




Obvious -> Oblivious




Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



I think #2 is




Obvious -> Oblivious




Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered May 30 at 13:29









Nuclear WangNuclear Wang

1,8737 silver badges19 bronze badges




1,8737 silver badges19 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:31

















  • $begingroup$
    That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:31
















$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31





$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31














14
















$begingroup$

For #1:




A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).




For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):




Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.




(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)




The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.




Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.







share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it not "li"?
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 30 at 13:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 30 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    Huh, so it is. OK then.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:28










  • $begingroup$
    Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:32















14
















$begingroup$

For #1:




A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).




For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):




Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.




(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)




The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.




Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.







share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it not "li"?
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 30 at 13:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 30 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    Huh, so it is. OK then.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:28










  • $begingroup$
    Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:32













14














14










14







$begingroup$

For #1:




A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).




For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):




Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.




(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)




The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.




Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.







share|improve this answer












$endgroup$



For #1:




A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).




For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):




Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.




(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)




The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.




Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.








share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited May 30 at 13:58

























answered May 30 at 13:23









Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

81.8k3 gold badges208 silver badges316 bronze badges




81.8k3 gold badges208 silver badges316 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it not "li"?
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 30 at 13:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 30 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    Huh, so it is. OK then.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:28










  • $begingroup$
    Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:32












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it not "li"?
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 30 at 13:25






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 30 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    Huh, so it is. OK then.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:28










  • $begingroup$
    Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 13:32







2




2




$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25




$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25




2




2




$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25




$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25












$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 13:28




$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 13:28












$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30




$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30




1




1




$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32




$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32











9
















$begingroup$

This fits for 1.N:




Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed


An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).







share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 14:04







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
    $endgroup$
    – Hellion
    May 30 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 15:05















9
















$begingroup$

This fits for 1.N:




Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed


An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).







share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 14:04







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
    $endgroup$
    – Hellion
    May 30 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 15:05













9














9










9







$begingroup$

This fits for 1.N:




Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed


An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).







share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



This fits for 1.N:




Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed


An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).








share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered May 30 at 13:55









TomTom

42.3k3 gold badges156 silver badges239 bronze badges




42.3k3 gold badges156 silver badges239 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 14:04







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
    $endgroup$
    – Hellion
    May 30 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 15:05
















  • $begingroup$
    Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 13:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 14:04







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
    $endgroup$
    – Hellion
    May 30 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    May 30 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 30 at 15:05















$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 13:57




$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 13:57












$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04





$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04





2




2




$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23




$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23




1




1




$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 14:26




$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
May 30 at 14:26




1




1




$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05




$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84528%2funconventional-opposites%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?