Unconventional OppositesChange a letter, add a letterSix-letter word with four unique vowelsUnusual letter combinationsA Compound word full of wordsIncomplete Word RectangleWord Rectangle #2Unusual letter combinations 2A Fairy Chess Ladder
Term for anticipating counterarguments and rebutting them
How to capture a possible figure of speech with "E se io fossi vago" in translation?
Can a planet's magnetic field be generated by non-ferromagnetic metals?
How does the Gameboy Link Cable work?
How does AT-AT deploy troops?
Is CR12 too difficult for two level 4 characters?
Why is Iceland Air's Saga Premium product classified as Business class?
I am particularly fascinated by the Chinese character that is pronounced SHIN & means faith or belief
Can a trainer send me a gift every day without opening my gift?
What could a technologically advanced but outnumbered alien race do to destroy humanity?
Doubt on finding simplex's initial canonical tableau (II Phase)
Can tankless & conventional water heaters join forces?
What is more proper notation in piano sheet music to denote that the left hand should be louder?
Why are there so many subway station signs between Yau Ma Tei station and Mong Kok station on Google Maps?
Is dark matter inside galaxies different from dark matter in intergalactic space?
How can an immortal member of the nobility be prevented from taking the throne?
Intuition behind the paradox of instantaneous heat propagation
Novel about a woman who is transformed into an elf
Can I still travel on the Troika Card even if it goes into a negative balance?
Why are bagpipes tuned using just intonation?
If a tournament advertises G/30, can either player demand G/25 d5?
Should I do a regression analysis even if the variables do not seem to be associated at all?
Sci-fi book trilogy about space travel & 'jacking'
How are letters between governments being transported and delivered?
Unconventional Opposites
Change a letter, add a letterSix-letter word with four unique vowelsUnusual letter combinationsA Compound word full of wordsIncomplete Word RectangleWord Rectangle #2Unusual letter combinations 2A Fairy Chess Ladder
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
$begingroup$
We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?
I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.
All words are English.
- N
- Li
Hint for #1:
Authority -> non-Authority
Hint for #2:
Known -> unknowing
word english
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?
I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.
All words are English.
- N
- Li
Hint for #1:
Authority -> non-Authority
Hint for #2:
Known -> unknowing
word english
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:12
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?
I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.
All words are English.
- N
- Li
Hint for #1:
Authority -> non-Authority
Hint for #2:
Known -> unknowing
word english
$endgroup$
We all know that many words can be made opposite by adding 'un' or 'ir' in front, but have you ever heard of opposites made by adding other letters in the middle?
I've given the letters that you need to add, and you need to come up with the words. The order of the letters cannot be changed, so you are simply adding the letter somewhere in the middle of the word to make a new word that is the 'opposite' of the first.
All words are English.
- N
- Li
Hint for #1:
Authority -> non-Authority
Hint for #2:
Known -> unknowing
word english
word english
edited May 30 at 13:37
Trenin
asked May 30 at 12:46
TreninTrenin
8,35817 silver badges49 bronze badges
8,35817 silver badges49 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:12
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:12
1
1
$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:12
$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:12
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think #2 is
Obvious -> Oblivious
Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
For #1:
A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).
For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):
Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.
(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)
The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.
Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25
2
$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This fits for 1.N:
Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed
An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04
2
$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 14:26
1
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84528%2funconventional-opposites%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think #2 is
Obvious -> Oblivious
Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I think #2 is
Obvious -> Oblivious
Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I think #2 is
Obvious -> Oblivious
Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".
$endgroup$
I think #2 is
Obvious -> Oblivious
Although those aren't really opposites, as the first means "readily apparent" while the second means "unaware of what is readily apparent", rather than "hidden or obscured".
answered May 30 at 13:29
Nuclear WangNuclear Wang
1,8737 silver badges19 bronze badges
1,8737 silver badges19 bronze badges
$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31
$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31
$begingroup$
That is correct! Kind of why I put opposites in quotes. They are unconventional opposites for more than one reason.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:31
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
For #1:
A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).
For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):
Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.
(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)
The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.
Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25
2
$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
For #1:
A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).
For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):
Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.
(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)
The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.
Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25
2
$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
For #1:
A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).
For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):
Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.
(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)
The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.
Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.
$endgroup$
For #1:
A goer is something viable, or someone active. A goner is something inviable, or someone who is going nowhere because they're about to die. | An owner is someone to whom a thing belongs. An ower is someone to whom it doesn't belong, who has to give it back. | A diner eats while a dinner is eaten. | If you don't mind rather antiquated English and also don't mind contractions, I bet I can find "Do't!" (do it) in Shakespeare (... I checked, and yes I can), and of course "don't!" would be an excellent way to contradict that instruction. | If something is unpraised then it will not be upraised (at least not in the sense of "exalted"). | Oh, and here's an unequivocal pair of opposites: aesthesia (the capacity to sense things) and anesthesia (what you get when that is taken away).
For #2, a pile of not-really-opposites (but I don't find the "official" answer very convincing either, I'm afraid):
Not exactly opposites, but I like the fact that we have Bern and Berlin. An alkane is never alkaline but these aren't opposites either. If you're in a fight then your opponent's deadliness corresponds to your own likely deadness, but that's some way from a real pair of opposites. I suppose acyclic and alicyclic are almost opposites, but "alicyclic" = "not acyclic AND ALSO aliphatic". A case of alliteration is one where a certain sort of alteration (change of consonant) isn't there, but again not really opposites.
(Note: I am using computer assistance, which may be disqualifying depending on @Trenin's intentions.)
The following were found when I was under the misapprehension that #2 was looking for LL rather than LI. The first is mostly a joke.
Troops are mostly men, do their work standing up, and are highly thought of in society even though they harm others for a living. Trollops, on the other hand, are mostly women, do their work lying down, and are disdained by society even though they please others for a living. | What is leveed is raised up in an embankment. What is levelled is made flat.
edited May 30 at 13:58
answered May 30 at 13:23
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
81.8k3 gold badges208 silver badges316 bronze badges
81.8k3 gold badges208 silver badges316 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25
2
$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25
2
$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32
2
2
$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Is it not "li"?
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 30 at 13:25
2
2
$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Oh I thought it's li instead of ll..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 30 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Huh, so it is. OK then.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30
$begingroup$
Great answers!! I was intending Li though. Should have included LL as well!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:30
1
1
$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32
$begingroup$
Oooo... I never thought there would be multiple answers. These are great! Not the ones I was thinking of, but no less good. Too bad I can't upvote you more than once!
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 13:32
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This fits for 1.N:
Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed
An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04
2
$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 14:26
1
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This fits for 1.N:
Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed
An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04
2
$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 14:26
1
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This fits for 1.N:
Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed
An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).
$endgroup$
This fits for 1.N:
Authority -> non-Authority → Uniformed -> uninformed
An example would be a Duce (uniformed leader) as opposed to a dunce (uninformed).
answered May 30 at 13:55
TomTom
42.3k3 gold badges156 silver badges239 bronze badges
42.3k3 gold badges156 silver badges239 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04
2
$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 14:26
1
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04
2
$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23
1
$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 14:26
1
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05
$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:57
$begingroup$
Lovely pair of pairings, though I hope it's not the intended answer because the "opposite" relation is a bit contrived in both cases.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan This is actually the intended answer. Sorry to disappoint Gareth. It did say unconventional in the title... Although of the two, this is more accurately an opposite. Someone who is uniformed is a person of authority. Someone who is uninformed is a person of no authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 14:04
2
2
$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
@Trenin unfortunately, you don't have to look very far to find uninformed persons in positions of authority....
$endgroup$
– Hellion
May 30 at 14:23
1
1
$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
A private soldier is uniformed but has about as little authority as anyone you care to mention. Or a supermarket checkout attendant.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 14:26
1
1
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Both of those have authority. If a soldier tells me to do something, I will likely do it. If the checkout attendant tells me how much my groceries are, I am not going to negotiate. But I get your point; not all people in uniform are figures of authority.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 30 at 15:05
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84528%2funconventional-opposites%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Usually no need for hints quite so soon after posting...
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
May 30 at 13:12