What does the wifi amplifier exactly amplify?Can two 802.11n devices communicate via a coaxial cable?Why does the 802.11 wifi spec allow for 11 channels?Cascaded vs. non-cascaded bridge-tied load circuits using opampsWhat exactly is the signal strength seen in API for BT/WiFi receivers?Do wireless amplifiers work in both directions?A question about selecting and using a fully differential amplifierUnderstanding RF amplification

Make a haystack (with a needle)

Why is Microwaved mac & cheese burnt where they touch?

Weakness of double encryption

Does recycling lead to less jobs?

How to answer to the "We do not want to create any precedent" argument in salary negotiation?

Can you put L trominos to fill the figure?

Python Printable Characters

Is it safe to plug one travel adapter into another?

How to discourage mundane play?

What does `twoside` mean here?

Why are one-word titles so dominant in books, film, and games?

Is there a high level reason why the inverse square law of gravitation yields periodic orbits without precession?

Did the Allies reverse the threads on secret microfilm-hiding buttons to thwart the Germans?

How do journals gain and lose reputation?

Merge numbers to a new number and find digit on position (n)

How can I adjust nth number in a line?

How can I more clearly ask people to accomodate for my autism?

Create a box using the tcolorbox package or any other? (image)

A word/phrase means "a small amount" (of a color)

Is there any physical evidence for motion?

Can a company prevent a co-author of a paper to put his name on it?

How to delete music as it's being played

Rational Number RNG

Would the minimum payment or full CC amount be considered monthly debt?



What does the wifi amplifier exactly amplify?


Can two 802.11n devices communicate via a coaxial cable?Why does the 802.11 wifi spec allow for 11 channels?Cascaded vs. non-cascaded bridge-tied load circuits using opampsWhat exactly is the signal strength seen in API for BT/WiFi receivers?Do wireless amplifiers work in both directions?A question about selecting and using a fully differential amplifierUnderstanding RF amplification






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









6














$begingroup$


The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?



As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port: enter image description here



On one hand:



  • It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.

  • And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.

On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!



How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 12:59










  • $begingroup$
    Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
    $endgroup$
    – hekete
    May 29 at 13:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 29 at 13:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
    $endgroup$
    – AndrejaKo
    May 29 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 14:00

















6














$begingroup$


The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?



As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port: enter image description here



On one hand:



  • It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.

  • And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.

On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!



How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 12:59










  • $begingroup$
    Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
    $endgroup$
    – hekete
    May 29 at 13:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 29 at 13:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
    $endgroup$
    – AndrejaKo
    May 29 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 14:00













6












6








6


0



$begingroup$


The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?



As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port: enter image description here



On one hand:



  • It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.

  • And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.

On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!



How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$




The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?



As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port: enter image description here



On one hand:



  • It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.

  • And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.

On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!



How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?







operational-amplifier amplifier rf radio wifi






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 29 at 12:41







xakepp35

















asked May 29 at 12:33









xakepp35xakepp35

23410 bronze badges




23410 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 12:59










  • $begingroup$
    Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
    $endgroup$
    – hekete
    May 29 at 13:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 29 at 13:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
    $endgroup$
    – AndrejaKo
    May 29 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 14:00












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 12:59










  • $begingroup$
    Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
    $endgroup$
    – hekete
    May 29 at 13:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 29 at 13:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
    $endgroup$
    – AndrejaKo
    May 29 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeroen3
    May 29 at 14:00







2




2




$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59




$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59












$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03




$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03












$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12




$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12




1




1




$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13




$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13




1




1




$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00




$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11
















$begingroup$


The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
operate in full duplex




It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -




Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
carrier sensing.




The full detailed spec is here: -




Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
Aluminum.




Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).



On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 30 at 0:39











  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 30 at 0:45











  • $begingroup$
    It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
    $endgroup$
    – Andy aka
    May 30 at 7:01


















2
















$begingroup$

Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.



Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.



An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:



Block Diagram






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$
















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440930%2fwhat-does-the-wifi-amplifier-exactly-amplify%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11
















    $begingroup$


    The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
    operate in full duplex




    It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -




    Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
    carrier sensing.




    The full detailed spec is here: -




    Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
    half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
    1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
    Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
    8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
    50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
    Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
    degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
    Aluminum.




    Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).



    On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:39











    • $begingroup$
      Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:45











    • $begingroup$
      It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
      $endgroup$
      – Andy aka
      May 30 at 7:01















    11
















    $begingroup$


    The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
    operate in full duplex




    It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -




    Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
    carrier sensing.




    The full detailed spec is here: -




    Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
    half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
    1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
    Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
    8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
    50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
    Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
    degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
    Aluminum.




    Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).



    On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:39











    • $begingroup$
      Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:45











    • $begingroup$
      It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
      $endgroup$
      – Andy aka
      May 30 at 7:01













    11














    11










    11







    $begingroup$


    The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
    operate in full duplex




    It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -




    Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
    carrier sensing.




    The full detailed spec is here: -




    Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
    half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
    1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
    Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
    8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
    50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
    Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
    degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
    Aluminum.




    Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).



    On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$




    The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
    operate in full duplex




    It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -




    Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
    carrier sensing.




    The full detailed spec is here: -




    Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
    half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
    1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
    Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
    8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
    50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
    Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
    degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
    Aluminum.




    Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).



    On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered May 29 at 12:58









    Andy akaAndy aka

    255k11 gold badges197 silver badges453 bronze badges




    255k11 gold badges197 silver badges453 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:39











    • $begingroup$
      Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:45











    • $begingroup$
      It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
      $endgroup$
      – Andy aka
      May 30 at 7:01
















    • $begingroup$
      Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:39











    • $begingroup$
      Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
      $endgroup$
      – xakepp35
      May 30 at 0:45











    • $begingroup$
      It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
      $endgroup$
      – Andy aka
      May 30 at 7:01















    $begingroup$
    Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 30 at 0:39





    $begingroup$
    Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 30 at 0:39













    $begingroup$
    Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 30 at 0:45





    $begingroup$
    Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
    $endgroup$
    – xakepp35
    May 30 at 0:45













    $begingroup$
    It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
    $endgroup$
    – Andy aka
    May 30 at 7:01




    $begingroup$
    It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
    $endgroup$
    – Andy aka
    May 30 at 7:01













    2
















    $begingroup$

    Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.



    Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.



    An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:



    Block Diagram






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$



















      2
















      $begingroup$

      Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.



      Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.



      An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:



      Block Diagram






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$

















        2














        2










        2







        $begingroup$

        Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.



        Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.



        An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:



        Block Diagram






        share|improve this answer












        $endgroup$



        Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.



        Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.



        An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:



        Block Diagram







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited May 31 at 1:51

























        answered May 31 at 1:45









        HitekHitek

        3785 bronze badges




        3785 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440930%2fwhat-does-the-wifi-amplifier-exactly-amplify%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?