Chess Board (5×5) problemcalculating the number of possible arrangements in chesscombinatorics board with digits neat problemFinding the number of counters having each colour.Board with black and white tilesNumber of colourings for which the vertices of a square can be coloured by three different colours such that adjacent vertices get different colours.Selecting non adjacent squares on a chess boardnumber of combinations colouring 10 eggs with 4 colours if one or 2 colours can be used at the same timeWays to choose balls such that identical colours are adjacent.Given a grid of $m times n$ squares in black and white. Given a rule, which grid sizes $m times n$ (with $m,n ge 3$) have a valid colouring?

Are the stars distributed in uniform distribution, on the celestial dome, with respect to brightness?

Is it possible to conserve the total kinetic energy of a system, but not its momentum?

Simple PyGame Connect 4

What is this old farm "combine"?

What does “critical but stable” mean?

Can this crack in the steel chain-side dropout be welded?

What causes the monitor to reduce to four lines on BK 0010 Focal?

Can two different limbs... Merge?

Why can't I shoot with a fast shutter speed?

What's the criteria/reasoning for Rick's three questions in The Walking Dead?

I missed an important client meeting and hurt my standing. How can I recover?

Security implication if android app can be installed on emulator

Can a Rod of Absorption Absorb a spell that was Twinned?

Why is the name 'propylene oxide' preferred for epoxypropane?

How to plot a uniform grid for a spatial and time domain using TikZ?

Is it ethical to apply for a short-term grant with a partner/spouse/girlfriend?

Does Dangerous Sorcery apply to cantrips?

Forgot item in a hotel in Spain; hotel says they can't ship it back to me

What game has this black main menu?

Can Toffoli operate on a qubit in superposition?

Initialising a variable of unknown type via overloaded constructors in C++

Is one spouse responsible if other failed to file taxes

Why is propagation delay a function of supply voltage?

Copy directory from a USB drive to another USB drive fails



Chess Board (5×5) problem


calculating the number of possible arrangements in chesscombinatorics board with digits neat problemFinding the number of counters having each colour.Board with black and white tilesNumber of colourings for which the vertices of a square can be coloured by three different colours such that adjacent vertices get different colours.Selecting non adjacent squares on a chess boardnumber of combinations colouring 10 eggs with 4 colours if one or 2 colours can be used at the same timeWays to choose balls such that identical colours are adjacent.Given a grid of $m times n$ squares in black and white. Given a rule, which grid sizes $m times n$ (with $m,n ge 3$) have a valid colouring?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








3















$begingroup$



25 small squares of a 5×5 chess board are coloured with 5 different
colours available, such that each row contains all 5 available colours
and no two adjacent squares have same colour. Then the no. of
different arrangements possible are?




My attempt:



Let the colours be R,B,G,W,V



To fill the first row I have 5×4×3×2×1



Now for the second row I am sort of messing up I am able to determine 4 cases only but I am getting it at all messed up again and again.



Help me with the editing as well please.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each row is a derangement of the previous row. There are $44$ derangements of 5 items. If you think of it as a permutation of the row, the only kinds of permutation of 5 items where everything moves are a 5-cycle (there are $4!$ of those) or a 2-cycle combined with a 3-cycle (there are $binom52 * 2$ of those).
    $endgroup$
    – Jaap Scherphuis
    Oct 2 at 8:05











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you that makes sense.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 8:16

















3















$begingroup$



25 small squares of a 5×5 chess board are coloured with 5 different
colours available, such that each row contains all 5 available colours
and no two adjacent squares have same colour. Then the no. of
different arrangements possible are?




My attempt:



Let the colours be R,B,G,W,V



To fill the first row I have 5×4×3×2×1



Now for the second row I am sort of messing up I am able to determine 4 cases only but I am getting it at all messed up again and again.



Help me with the editing as well please.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each row is a derangement of the previous row. There are $44$ derangements of 5 items. If you think of it as a permutation of the row, the only kinds of permutation of 5 items where everything moves are a 5-cycle (there are $4!$ of those) or a 2-cycle combined with a 3-cycle (there are $binom52 * 2$ of those).
    $endgroup$
    – Jaap Scherphuis
    Oct 2 at 8:05











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you that makes sense.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 8:16













3













3









3





$begingroup$



25 small squares of a 5×5 chess board are coloured with 5 different
colours available, such that each row contains all 5 available colours
and no two adjacent squares have same colour. Then the no. of
different arrangements possible are?




My attempt:



Let the colours be R,B,G,W,V



To fill the first row I have 5×4×3×2×1



Now for the second row I am sort of messing up I am able to determine 4 cases only but I am getting it at all messed up again and again.



Help me with the editing as well please.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





25 small squares of a 5×5 chess board are coloured with 5 different
colours available, such that each row contains all 5 available colours
and no two adjacent squares have same colour. Then the no. of
different arrangements possible are?




My attempt:



Let the colours be R,B,G,W,V



To fill the first row I have 5×4×3×2×1



Now for the second row I am sort of messing up I am able to determine 4 cases only but I am getting it at all messed up again and again.



Help me with the editing as well please.







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Oct 2 at 7:50









DareDevilDareDevil

1815 bronze badges




1815 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each row is a derangement of the previous row. There are $44$ derangements of 5 items. If you think of it as a permutation of the row, the only kinds of permutation of 5 items where everything moves are a 5-cycle (there are $4!$ of those) or a 2-cycle combined with a 3-cycle (there are $binom52 * 2$ of those).
    $endgroup$
    – Jaap Scherphuis
    Oct 2 at 8:05











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you that makes sense.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 8:16












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Each row is a derangement of the previous row. There are $44$ derangements of 5 items. If you think of it as a permutation of the row, the only kinds of permutation of 5 items where everything moves are a 5-cycle (there are $4!$ of those) or a 2-cycle combined with a 3-cycle (there are $binom52 * 2$ of those).
    $endgroup$
    – Jaap Scherphuis
    Oct 2 at 8:05











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you that makes sense.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 8:16







1




1




$begingroup$
Each row is a derangement of the previous row. There are $44$ derangements of 5 items. If you think of it as a permutation of the row, the only kinds of permutation of 5 items where everything moves are a 5-cycle (there are $4!$ of those) or a 2-cycle combined with a 3-cycle (there are $binom52 * 2$ of those).
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
Oct 2 at 8:05





$begingroup$
Each row is a derangement of the previous row. There are $44$ derangements of 5 items. If you think of it as a permutation of the row, the only kinds of permutation of 5 items where everything moves are a 5-cycle (there are $4!$ of those) or a 2-cycle combined with a 3-cycle (there are $binom52 * 2$ of those).
$endgroup$
– Jaap Scherphuis
Oct 2 at 8:05













$begingroup$
Thank you that makes sense.
$endgroup$
– DareDevil
Oct 2 at 8:16




$begingroup$
Thank you that makes sense.
$endgroup$
– DareDevil
Oct 2 at 8:16










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4

















$begingroup$

Consider the following chess table:
$$beginarray hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Let's fill the first row with any colors:



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d& e \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



The ways to choose $(a,b,c,d,e)$ is $5!$



For the second row, apply inclusion-exclusion.



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Total possible concievable arrangements of $(a',b',c',d',e')$ are again $5!$ but we must remove some unfavorable cases.



This is known as a derangement. So, we have counted in our $5!$ some cases where one of $l = l'$ where $l$ is one of $a,b,c,d,e$. The number of such cases is $binom 514!$. But, in this, we have removed some cases where $l=l'$ for two $l$ twice (once for one $l$, another time for the other). The number of such cases is $binom 523!$. Continuing like this, we have the total good arrangements as $5!left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)$. Once we have set the arrangement for this row, we may repeat the process for the next row, and so on.
$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline a''&b'' &c'' &d'' &e'' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



So, by my calculation, the total favorable arrangements is $$5!^5left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)^4$$
$$= 120*44^4boxed=449771520$$






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil Cheers, glad to help.
    $endgroup$
    – Certainly not a dog
    Oct 2 at 13:51


















3

















$begingroup$

As you noticed for the first we have $5!$ arrangement, for the second row we can use inclusion and exclusion principle as follows.



Notably, the number of cases for the second row with at least two adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row, by inclusion and exclusion principle, is:



$$5cdot 4!-binom52cdot 3!+binom53cdot 2!-binom54cdot 1!+binom55cdot 0!=76$$



therefore the number of cases for the second row with no adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row is:



$$5!-76=120-76=44$$



which is valid for all the others three rows and then finally, by multiplication rule, we obtain:



$$5!cdot (44)^4$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil You are welcome! Bye
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Oct 2 at 12:30












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3377725%2fchess-board-5%25c3%25975-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4

















$begingroup$

Consider the following chess table:
$$beginarray hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Let's fill the first row with any colors:



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d& e \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



The ways to choose $(a,b,c,d,e)$ is $5!$



For the second row, apply inclusion-exclusion.



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Total possible concievable arrangements of $(a',b',c',d',e')$ are again $5!$ but we must remove some unfavorable cases.



This is known as a derangement. So, we have counted in our $5!$ some cases where one of $l = l'$ where $l$ is one of $a,b,c,d,e$. The number of such cases is $binom 514!$. But, in this, we have removed some cases where $l=l'$ for two $l$ twice (once for one $l$, another time for the other). The number of such cases is $binom 523!$. Continuing like this, we have the total good arrangements as $5!left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)$. Once we have set the arrangement for this row, we may repeat the process for the next row, and so on.
$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline a''&b'' &c'' &d'' &e'' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



So, by my calculation, the total favorable arrangements is $$5!^5left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)^4$$
$$= 120*44^4boxed=449771520$$






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil Cheers, glad to help.
    $endgroup$
    – Certainly not a dog
    Oct 2 at 13:51















4

















$begingroup$

Consider the following chess table:
$$beginarray hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Let's fill the first row with any colors:



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d& e \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



The ways to choose $(a,b,c,d,e)$ is $5!$



For the second row, apply inclusion-exclusion.



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Total possible concievable arrangements of $(a',b',c',d',e')$ are again $5!$ but we must remove some unfavorable cases.



This is known as a derangement. So, we have counted in our $5!$ some cases where one of $l = l'$ where $l$ is one of $a,b,c,d,e$. The number of such cases is $binom 514!$. But, in this, we have removed some cases where $l=l'$ for two $l$ twice (once for one $l$, another time for the other). The number of such cases is $binom 523!$. Continuing like this, we have the total good arrangements as $5!left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)$. Once we have set the arrangement for this row, we may repeat the process for the next row, and so on.
$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline a''&b'' &c'' &d'' &e'' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



So, by my calculation, the total favorable arrangements is $$5!^5left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)^4$$
$$= 120*44^4boxed=449771520$$






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil Cheers, glad to help.
    $endgroup$
    – Certainly not a dog
    Oct 2 at 13:51













4















4











4







$begingroup$

Consider the following chess table:
$$beginarray hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Let's fill the first row with any colors:



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d& e \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



The ways to choose $(a,b,c,d,e)$ is $5!$



For the second row, apply inclusion-exclusion.



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Total possible concievable arrangements of $(a',b',c',d',e')$ are again $5!$ but we must remove some unfavorable cases.



This is known as a derangement. So, we have counted in our $5!$ some cases where one of $l = l'$ where $l$ is one of $a,b,c,d,e$. The number of such cases is $binom 514!$. But, in this, we have removed some cases where $l=l'$ for two $l$ twice (once for one $l$, another time for the other). The number of such cases is $binom 523!$. Continuing like this, we have the total good arrangements as $5!left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)$. Once we have set the arrangement for this row, we may repeat the process for the next row, and so on.
$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline a''&b'' &c'' &d'' &e'' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



So, by my calculation, the total favorable arrangements is $$5!^5left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)^4$$
$$= 120*44^4boxed=449771520$$






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$



Consider the following chess table:
$$beginarray hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Let's fill the first row with any colors:



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d& e \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



The ways to choose $(a,b,c,d,e)$ is $5!$



For the second row, apply inclusion-exclusion.



$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



Total possible concievable arrangements of $(a',b',c',d',e')$ are again $5!$ but we must remove some unfavorable cases.



This is known as a derangement. So, we have counted in our $5!$ some cases where one of $l = l'$ where $l$ is one of $a,b,c,d,e$. The number of such cases is $binom 514!$. But, in this, we have removed some cases where $l=l'$ for two $l$ twice (once for one $l$, another time for the other). The number of such cases is $binom 523!$. Continuing like this, we have the total good arrangements as $5!left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)$. Once we have set the arrangement for this row, we may repeat the process for the next row, and so on.
$$beginarray hline a& b& c& d&e \ hline a'&b' &c' &d' &e' \ hline a''&b'' &c'' &d'' &e'' \ hline & & & & \ hline & & & & \ hline endarray$$



So, by my calculation, the total favorable arrangements is $$5!^5left(displaystylesum_k = 0^5left(-1right)^kfrac 1k!right)^4$$
$$= 120*44^4boxed=449771520$$







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer








edited Oct 2 at 9:11

























answered Oct 2 at 8:16









Certainly not a dogCertainly not a dog

1,2432 silver badges15 bronze badges




1,2432 silver badges15 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil Cheers, glad to help.
    $endgroup$
    – Certainly not a dog
    Oct 2 at 13:51












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil Cheers, glad to help.
    $endgroup$
    – Certainly not a dog
    Oct 2 at 13:51







1




1




$begingroup$
Thank you for your efforts.
$endgroup$
– DareDevil
Oct 2 at 12:28




$begingroup$
Thank you for your efforts.
$endgroup$
– DareDevil
Oct 2 at 12:28












$begingroup$
@DareDevil Cheers, glad to help.
$endgroup$
– Certainly not a dog
Oct 2 at 13:51




$begingroup$
@DareDevil Cheers, glad to help.
$endgroup$
– Certainly not a dog
Oct 2 at 13:51













3

















$begingroup$

As you noticed for the first we have $5!$ arrangement, for the second row we can use inclusion and exclusion principle as follows.



Notably, the number of cases for the second row with at least two adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row, by inclusion and exclusion principle, is:



$$5cdot 4!-binom52cdot 3!+binom53cdot 2!-binom54cdot 1!+binom55cdot 0!=76$$



therefore the number of cases for the second row with no adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row is:



$$5!-76=120-76=44$$



which is valid for all the others three rows and then finally, by multiplication rule, we obtain:



$$5!cdot (44)^4$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil You are welcome! Bye
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Oct 2 at 12:30















3

















$begingroup$

As you noticed for the first we have $5!$ arrangement, for the second row we can use inclusion and exclusion principle as follows.



Notably, the number of cases for the second row with at least two adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row, by inclusion and exclusion principle, is:



$$5cdot 4!-binom52cdot 3!+binom53cdot 2!-binom54cdot 1!+binom55cdot 0!=76$$



therefore the number of cases for the second row with no adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row is:



$$5!-76=120-76=44$$



which is valid for all the others three rows and then finally, by multiplication rule, we obtain:



$$5!cdot (44)^4$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil You are welcome! Bye
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Oct 2 at 12:30













3















3











3







$begingroup$

As you noticed for the first we have $5!$ arrangement, for the second row we can use inclusion and exclusion principle as follows.



Notably, the number of cases for the second row with at least two adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row, by inclusion and exclusion principle, is:



$$5cdot 4!-binom52cdot 3!+binom53cdot 2!-binom54cdot 1!+binom55cdot 0!=76$$



therefore the number of cases for the second row with no adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row is:



$$5!-76=120-76=44$$



which is valid for all the others three rows and then finally, by multiplication rule, we obtain:



$$5!cdot (44)^4$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$



As you noticed for the first we have $5!$ arrangement, for the second row we can use inclusion and exclusion principle as follows.



Notably, the number of cases for the second row with at least two adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row, by inclusion and exclusion principle, is:



$$5cdot 4!-binom52cdot 3!+binom53cdot 2!-binom54cdot 1!+binom55cdot 0!=76$$



therefore the number of cases for the second row with no adjacent squares with the same colour with respect to the first row is:



$$5!-76=120-76=44$$



which is valid for all the others three rows and then finally, by multiplication rule, we obtain:



$$5!cdot (44)^4$$







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer










answered Oct 2 at 9:18









useruser

112k10 gold badges50 silver badges102 bronze badges




112k10 gold badges50 silver badges102 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil You are welcome! Bye
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Oct 2 at 12:30
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your efforts.
    $endgroup$
    – DareDevil
    Oct 2 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    @DareDevil You are welcome! Bye
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Oct 2 at 12:30















$begingroup$
Thank you for your efforts.
$endgroup$
– DareDevil
Oct 2 at 12:28




$begingroup$
Thank you for your efforts.
$endgroup$
– DareDevil
Oct 2 at 12:28












$begingroup$
@DareDevil You are welcome! Bye
$endgroup$
– user
Oct 2 at 12:30




$begingroup$
@DareDevil You are welcome! Bye
$endgroup$
– user
Oct 2 at 12:30


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3377725%2fchess-board-5%25c3%25975-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?