Is negative resistance possible?What is negative ResistanceWhy is the first band on a resistor never black?Compute the minimum number of 120Ω resistors to get 80Ω of resistance?Negative Effective ResistanceHow to calculate value of R2 in this circuit?Converting current signal to voltage signal with a resistorDetermining potentiometer sensor output resistance with parallel resistorConceptual paradox with resistance in loop/node analysis

How do professors and lecturers learn to teach?

Next Shared Totient

Intersection of sorted lists

How do electric hot water heaters explode and what can be done to prevent that from happening?

a box full of unfair coins

Arcane Adept: is this proposed Warlock feat balanced as compared to PHB feats?

How much tech advancement could be made out of modern processor appearing in 1980s?

Is concept of entropy really indispensable? Especially when the concept of potential energy can serve the purpose?

Round up my number

Is it safe to drive from Prague to Salzburg during winter?

Why do amateur radio operators call an RF choke a balun?

Can I weaken a coil spring consisting of spring steel?

What does 36.000€ mean?

How does an immortal vampire king hide his vampirism and immortality?

Why do Russian names transliterated into English have unpronounceable 'k's before 'h's (e.g. 'Mikhail' instead of just 'Mihail')?

Does the "stand your ground" law regarding shooting an intruder apply when the door of the dwelling was not locked?

What visual cues distinguish the different floors on The Big Bang Theory?

What should be done if I suspect a player is using weighted dice?

Thoughts on using user stories to define business/platform needs?

Exporting multiple point shapefiles from one file using QGIS

Aligning Control in Manipulate

In Germany, why does the burden of proof fall on authorities rather than the company or individual when it comes to possible illegal funds?

Why do right-wing parties generally oppose the legalization of marijuana?

Why couldn't Rick just use a micro sun to power his car?



Is negative resistance possible?


What is negative ResistanceWhy is the first band on a resistor never black?Compute the minimum number of 120Ω resistors to get 80Ω of resistance?Negative Effective ResistanceHow to calculate value of R2 in this circuit?Converting current signal to voltage signal with a resistorDetermining potentiometer sensor output resistance with parallel resistorConceptual paradox with resistance in loop/node analysis






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









4















$begingroup$


I was reading Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis Book,(I tried others, but this is the most comprehensible to me.), And I came across this circuit. I understand the first two, but I don't understand how, in the 3rd circuit (c), there is negative voltage through the resistor $R_3$ , while the current through it from $+$ to $-$ is positive $7A$. I don't understand how resistors can supply voltage. My guess is this is only a mathematical model, not real.



Edit: The Answers are shuffled in this book.
Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis










share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Any conclusions reached should be edited back into the question and/or any answer(s).
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Tweed
    Sep 28 at 22:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of What is negative Resistance
    $endgroup$
    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    Sep 29 at 14:04

















4















$begingroup$


I was reading Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis Book,(I tried others, but this is the most comprehensible to me.), And I came across this circuit. I understand the first two, but I don't understand how, in the 3rd circuit (c), there is negative voltage through the resistor $R_3$ , while the current through it from $+$ to $-$ is positive $7A$. I don't understand how resistors can supply voltage. My guess is this is only a mathematical model, not real.



Edit: The Answers are shuffled in this book.
Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis










share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Any conclusions reached should be edited back into the question and/or any answer(s).
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Tweed
    Sep 28 at 22:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of What is negative Resistance
    $endgroup$
    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    Sep 29 at 14:04













4













4









4


2



$begingroup$


I was reading Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis Book,(I tried others, but this is the most comprehensible to me.), And I came across this circuit. I understand the first two, but I don't understand how, in the 3rd circuit (c), there is negative voltage through the resistor $R_3$ , while the current through it from $+$ to $-$ is positive $7A$. I don't understand how resistors can supply voltage. My guess is this is only a mathematical model, not real.



Edit: The Answers are shuffled in this book.
Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was reading Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis Book,(I tried others, but this is the most comprehensible to me.), And I came across this circuit. I understand the first two, but I don't understand how, in the 3rd circuit (c), there is negative voltage through the resistor $R_3$ , while the current through it from $+$ to $-$ is positive $7A$. I don't understand how resistors can supply voltage. My guess is this is only a mathematical model, not real.



Edit: The Answers are shuffled in this book.
Hayt Kemmerly Engineering Circuit Analysis







resistors negative-resistance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 28 at 19:06







Angular Orbit

















asked Sep 27 at 22:11









Angular OrbitAngular Orbit

677 bronze badges




677 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Any conclusions reached should be edited back into the question and/or any answer(s).
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Tweed
    Sep 28 at 22:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of What is negative Resistance
    $endgroup$
    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    Sep 29 at 14:04












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Any conclusions reached should be edited back into the question and/or any answer(s).
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Tweed
    Sep 28 at 22:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of What is negative Resistance
    $endgroup$
    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    Sep 29 at 14:04







1




1




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Any conclusions reached should be edited back into the question and/or any answer(s).
$endgroup$
– Dave Tweed
Sep 28 at 22:10





$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Any conclusions reached should be edited back into the question and/or any answer(s).
$endgroup$
– Dave Tweed
Sep 28 at 22:10





1




1




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of What is negative Resistance
$endgroup$
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Sep 29 at 14:04




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of What is negative Resistance
$endgroup$
– Dmitry Grigoryev
Sep 29 at 14:04










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















20

















$begingroup$

In a passive device, negative absolute resistance cannot exist. However, negative differential resistance, where an increase in voltage leads to a decrease in current or vice versa, is observed in a number of rather common systems, such as neon signage and fluorescent lighting, as well as some more esoteric ones like tunnel diodes. Below is a figure showing an I-V curve for a generic electrical discharge; notice the region between points D and G where the voltage decreases as the current increases. This is the region in which both fluorescent lighting and neon signage normally operate.



A current-voltage curve for a generic electrical discharge.
(image source)



Negative absolute resistance can exist over limited ranges by using active elements. There's an op amp circuit commonly called a negative impedance converter that simulates a negative resistance, capacitance, or inductance by using an op amp and feedback:





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



The two circuits above are equivalent, provided the op amp does not saturate.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    This seems not to be an answer to the actual question?
    $endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Sep 28 at 10:34






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @asdfex The question asked "is negative resistance possible".
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 28 at 11:32






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    No, that's just the title. The actual question is a very different one about understanding a simple schematic diagram in a textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Sep 28 at 12:52






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @asdfex I prefer to answer the question that is explicitly asked, rather than one that is implicit in the context. There is only one question mark in the question, and it's at the end of the sentence "is negative resistance possible?".
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 29 at 11:05


















7

















$begingroup$

My apologies to everyone, the original solution was wrong, I had the direction of the currents through R2 and R3 reversed. Solution now edited.




If we Measure all voltages relative to the common junction of the 2 ohm resistor, R2, the 8A current source and the 3 ohm resistor then:



  1. Summing the currents at the node at the top right gives the 37V
    voltage source supplying a current of 7A. (15-8)

  2. At the - end of the 37V source the 2 ohm resistor has 6A flowing through it therefore the current through R2 is 1A to make up the 7A.

  3. The top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at -12V (2 ohms X 6A). and hence R2 = 12 ohms (12V / 1A).

  4. The node at the top right is at 45V as 15A flows through the 3 ohm resistor.

  5. The other end of R3 (the + end of the voltage source) is at 37-12 = +25V (the voltage across R2 and the 2 ohm resistor -12V + the 37V source)

  6. The voltage across R3, Vs = 20V (45-25).

  7. -7A is flowing through R3 and hence R3 = -20/7 ohms, or approximately -2.86 ohms.

The more I look at it, the more I think the "-" in front of the 4 and 20 in the answers is just a dash (hyphen) not a minus sign.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If the node at the top right is at +45V, the top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at **–**12V. Note the 6A current direction.
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 11:31











  • $begingroup$
    There is something wrong with your solution. To see why try to solve it with the values you give.
    $endgroup$
    – G36
    Sep 28 at 11:39










  • $begingroup$
    Peter, there's another mistake in your solution. As you found out, the potential at the left end of R3 is +25V, while the potential at the right end of R3 is +45V. This means there has to be a current flow from right to left. This contradicts the sum current of the upper right node. That's what the OP's problem is about.
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 15:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Anyway, if you pay attention at your steps 6 and 7 (everything up to that looks fine to me) you'll notice that the 7 A current across R3 is flowing from +25 V to +45 V. That's not how a normal resistor works.
    $endgroup$
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Sep 28 at 16:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @IlmariKaronen OK you are right. My solution is still faulty, I'll put it right. I somehow wonder if the original book has an error. From the look of it it seems highly unlikely they would have been including negative resistors. Maybe someone didn't check the exercises carefully enough and made the same mistakes that I have.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Jennings
    Sep 28 at 16:38


















5

















$begingroup$

To get the current and voltage values that were shown in the book.

You indeed need a negative resistance in the circuit.
The R3 needs to have negative resistance $R_3 = - frac20V7A = -2.857Omega$



Because for the positive resistance we get this result:



enter image description here



As you can see the result is not even a close to the book solution.



But if we use a "real" negative resistance (negative impedance converter) instead.



The simulation result will match the book solution:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I love this answer. (Could you add the actual currents in the 2Ω and 3Ω resistors in both cases?)
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 15:11











  • $begingroup$
    Oh, neat. I don't think I've seen a floating NIC before; I guess it's obvious it would be possible but I'd never considered it. (it isn't exactly something you need very often, if ever)
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 29 at 11:08


















5

















$begingroup$

This won't answer the question, but will show how you find that R3 must have negative resistance.



Here's the circuit diagram, with a couple of annotations:



enter image description here



First, from Ohm's law, we know that the voltage across the 2 ohm resistor is 12 V, and the voltage across the 3 ohm resistor is 45 V.



If you take KVL around the loop indicated with the orange arrow, you get



$$ -45 V + (-12 V) + 37 V - v_x = 0$$



This gives you $v_x = -20 V$.



Defining $I_x$ as the current through R3 (flowing left to right according to the passive sign convention), and using KCL at node "A" you get



$$ I_x + 8 A - 15 A = 0$$



From which, $I_x =7 A$.



You now have



$$R_3 = fracv_xI_x = frac-20 V7 A = -2.86 rm Omega$$



It does not matter if you reverse the direction of $v_x$. If you do that (and also reverse the direction of $I_x$ to maintain the passive current convention) you'll just get $v_x=+20 V$ and $I_x=-7 A$.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$





















    0

















    $begingroup$

    Ohmic negative resistance doesnt exist.However there is negative resistance.Zener diodes at their breakdown voltages have negative resistance since they create current by quantum tunneling.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$









    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Zener diodes don't exhibit negative resistance. I think you might be confusing them with tunnel diodes.
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 27 at 22:33






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Quantum tunneling is a type of negative resistance and zener diodes work with quantum tunneling in reverse breakdown.
      $endgroup$
      – Bright Future
      Sep 27 at 22:39







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Quantum tunnelling is the cause of negative resistance in a tunnel diode, but tunnelling itself is not a type of negative resistance.
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 27 at 22:47












    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460605%2fis-negative-resistance-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    20

















    $begingroup$

    In a passive device, negative absolute resistance cannot exist. However, negative differential resistance, where an increase in voltage leads to a decrease in current or vice versa, is observed in a number of rather common systems, such as neon signage and fluorescent lighting, as well as some more esoteric ones like tunnel diodes. Below is a figure showing an I-V curve for a generic electrical discharge; notice the region between points D and G where the voltage decreases as the current increases. This is the region in which both fluorescent lighting and neon signage normally operate.



    A current-voltage curve for a generic electrical discharge.
    (image source)



    Negative absolute resistance can exist over limited ranges by using active elements. There's an op amp circuit commonly called a negative impedance converter that simulates a negative resistance, capacitance, or inductance by using an op amp and feedback:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    The two circuits above are equivalent, provided the op amp does not saturate.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$









    • 7




      $begingroup$
      This seems not to be an answer to the actual question?
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 10:34






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex The question asked "is negative resistance possible".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 28 at 11:32






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      No, that's just the title. The actual question is a very different one about understanding a simple schematic diagram in a textbook.
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 12:52






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex I prefer to answer the question that is explicitly asked, rather than one that is implicit in the context. There is only one question mark in the question, and it's at the end of the sentence "is negative resistance possible?".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:05















    20

















    $begingroup$

    In a passive device, negative absolute resistance cannot exist. However, negative differential resistance, where an increase in voltage leads to a decrease in current or vice versa, is observed in a number of rather common systems, such as neon signage and fluorescent lighting, as well as some more esoteric ones like tunnel diodes. Below is a figure showing an I-V curve for a generic electrical discharge; notice the region between points D and G where the voltage decreases as the current increases. This is the region in which both fluorescent lighting and neon signage normally operate.



    A current-voltage curve for a generic electrical discharge.
    (image source)



    Negative absolute resistance can exist over limited ranges by using active elements. There's an op amp circuit commonly called a negative impedance converter that simulates a negative resistance, capacitance, or inductance by using an op amp and feedback:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    The two circuits above are equivalent, provided the op amp does not saturate.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$









    • 7




      $begingroup$
      This seems not to be an answer to the actual question?
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 10:34






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex The question asked "is negative resistance possible".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 28 at 11:32






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      No, that's just the title. The actual question is a very different one about understanding a simple schematic diagram in a textbook.
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 12:52






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex I prefer to answer the question that is explicitly asked, rather than one that is implicit in the context. There is only one question mark in the question, and it's at the end of the sentence "is negative resistance possible?".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:05













    20















    20











    20







    $begingroup$

    In a passive device, negative absolute resistance cannot exist. However, negative differential resistance, where an increase in voltage leads to a decrease in current or vice versa, is observed in a number of rather common systems, such as neon signage and fluorescent lighting, as well as some more esoteric ones like tunnel diodes. Below is a figure showing an I-V curve for a generic electrical discharge; notice the region between points D and G where the voltage decreases as the current increases. This is the region in which both fluorescent lighting and neon signage normally operate.



    A current-voltage curve for a generic electrical discharge.
    (image source)



    Negative absolute resistance can exist over limited ranges by using active elements. There's an op amp circuit commonly called a negative impedance converter that simulates a negative resistance, capacitance, or inductance by using an op amp and feedback:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    The two circuits above are equivalent, provided the op amp does not saturate.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$



    In a passive device, negative absolute resistance cannot exist. However, negative differential resistance, where an increase in voltage leads to a decrease in current or vice versa, is observed in a number of rather common systems, such as neon signage and fluorescent lighting, as well as some more esoteric ones like tunnel diodes. Below is a figure showing an I-V curve for a generic electrical discharge; notice the region between points D and G where the voltage decreases as the current increases. This is the region in which both fluorescent lighting and neon signage normally operate.



    A current-voltage curve for a generic electrical discharge.
    (image source)



    Negative absolute resistance can exist over limited ranges by using active elements. There's an op amp circuit commonly called a negative impedance converter that simulates a negative resistance, capacitance, or inductance by using an op amp and feedback:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    The two circuits above are equivalent, provided the op amp does not saturate.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 27 at 22:46









    HearthHearth

    8,9181 gold badge20 silver badges53 bronze badges




    8,9181 gold badge20 silver badges53 bronze badges










    • 7




      $begingroup$
      This seems not to be an answer to the actual question?
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 10:34






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex The question asked "is negative resistance possible".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 28 at 11:32






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      No, that's just the title. The actual question is a very different one about understanding a simple schematic diagram in a textbook.
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 12:52






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex I prefer to answer the question that is explicitly asked, rather than one that is implicit in the context. There is only one question mark in the question, and it's at the end of the sentence "is negative resistance possible?".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:05












    • 7




      $begingroup$
      This seems not to be an answer to the actual question?
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 10:34






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex The question asked "is negative resistance possible".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 28 at 11:32






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      No, that's just the title. The actual question is a very different one about understanding a simple schematic diagram in a textbook.
      $endgroup$
      – asdfex
      Sep 28 at 12:52






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @asdfex I prefer to answer the question that is explicitly asked, rather than one that is implicit in the context. There is only one question mark in the question, and it's at the end of the sentence "is negative resistance possible?".
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:05







    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    This seems not to be an answer to the actual question?
    $endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Sep 28 at 10:34




    $begingroup$
    This seems not to be an answer to the actual question?
    $endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Sep 28 at 10:34




    6




    6




    $begingroup$
    @asdfex The question asked "is negative resistance possible".
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 28 at 11:32




    $begingroup$
    @asdfex The question asked "is negative resistance possible".
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 28 at 11:32




    9




    9




    $begingroup$
    No, that's just the title. The actual question is a very different one about understanding a simple schematic diagram in a textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Sep 28 at 12:52




    $begingroup$
    No, that's just the title. The actual question is a very different one about understanding a simple schematic diagram in a textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Sep 28 at 12:52




    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    @asdfex I prefer to answer the question that is explicitly asked, rather than one that is implicit in the context. There is only one question mark in the question, and it's at the end of the sentence "is negative resistance possible?".
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 29 at 11:05




    $begingroup$
    @asdfex I prefer to answer the question that is explicitly asked, rather than one that is implicit in the context. There is only one question mark in the question, and it's at the end of the sentence "is negative resistance possible?".
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 29 at 11:05













    7

















    $begingroup$

    My apologies to everyone, the original solution was wrong, I had the direction of the currents through R2 and R3 reversed. Solution now edited.




    If we Measure all voltages relative to the common junction of the 2 ohm resistor, R2, the 8A current source and the 3 ohm resistor then:



    1. Summing the currents at the node at the top right gives the 37V
      voltage source supplying a current of 7A. (15-8)

    2. At the - end of the 37V source the 2 ohm resistor has 6A flowing through it therefore the current through R2 is 1A to make up the 7A.

    3. The top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at -12V (2 ohms X 6A). and hence R2 = 12 ohms (12V / 1A).

    4. The node at the top right is at 45V as 15A flows through the 3 ohm resistor.

    5. The other end of R3 (the + end of the voltage source) is at 37-12 = +25V (the voltage across R2 and the 2 ohm resistor -12V + the 37V source)

    6. The voltage across R3, Vs = 20V (45-25).

    7. -7A is flowing through R3 and hence R3 = -20/7 ohms, or approximately -2.86 ohms.

    The more I look at it, the more I think the "-" in front of the 4 and 20 in the answers is just a dash (hyphen) not a minus sign.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If the node at the top right is at +45V, the top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at **–**12V. Note the 6A current direction.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 11:31











    • $begingroup$
      There is something wrong with your solution. To see why try to solve it with the values you give.
      $endgroup$
      – G36
      Sep 28 at 11:39










    • $begingroup$
      Peter, there's another mistake in your solution. As you found out, the potential at the left end of R3 is +25V, while the potential at the right end of R3 is +45V. This means there has to be a current flow from right to left. This contradicts the sum current of the upper right node. That's what the OP's problem is about.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:08







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Anyway, if you pay attention at your steps 6 and 7 (everything up to that looks fine to me) you'll notice that the 7 A current across R3 is flowing from +25 V to +45 V. That's not how a normal resistor works.
      $endgroup$
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 28 at 16:23






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @IlmariKaronen OK you are right. My solution is still faulty, I'll put it right. I somehow wonder if the original book has an error. From the look of it it seems highly unlikely they would have been including negative resistors. Maybe someone didn't check the exercises carefully enough and made the same mistakes that I have.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Jennings
      Sep 28 at 16:38















    7

















    $begingroup$

    My apologies to everyone, the original solution was wrong, I had the direction of the currents through R2 and R3 reversed. Solution now edited.




    If we Measure all voltages relative to the common junction of the 2 ohm resistor, R2, the 8A current source and the 3 ohm resistor then:



    1. Summing the currents at the node at the top right gives the 37V
      voltage source supplying a current of 7A. (15-8)

    2. At the - end of the 37V source the 2 ohm resistor has 6A flowing through it therefore the current through R2 is 1A to make up the 7A.

    3. The top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at -12V (2 ohms X 6A). and hence R2 = 12 ohms (12V / 1A).

    4. The node at the top right is at 45V as 15A flows through the 3 ohm resistor.

    5. The other end of R3 (the + end of the voltage source) is at 37-12 = +25V (the voltage across R2 and the 2 ohm resistor -12V + the 37V source)

    6. The voltage across R3, Vs = 20V (45-25).

    7. -7A is flowing through R3 and hence R3 = -20/7 ohms, or approximately -2.86 ohms.

    The more I look at it, the more I think the "-" in front of the 4 and 20 in the answers is just a dash (hyphen) not a minus sign.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If the node at the top right is at +45V, the top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at **–**12V. Note the 6A current direction.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 11:31











    • $begingroup$
      There is something wrong with your solution. To see why try to solve it with the values you give.
      $endgroup$
      – G36
      Sep 28 at 11:39










    • $begingroup$
      Peter, there's another mistake in your solution. As you found out, the potential at the left end of R3 is +25V, while the potential at the right end of R3 is +45V. This means there has to be a current flow from right to left. This contradicts the sum current of the upper right node. That's what the OP's problem is about.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:08







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Anyway, if you pay attention at your steps 6 and 7 (everything up to that looks fine to me) you'll notice that the 7 A current across R3 is flowing from +25 V to +45 V. That's not how a normal resistor works.
      $endgroup$
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 28 at 16:23






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @IlmariKaronen OK you are right. My solution is still faulty, I'll put it right. I somehow wonder if the original book has an error. From the look of it it seems highly unlikely they would have been including negative resistors. Maybe someone didn't check the exercises carefully enough and made the same mistakes that I have.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Jennings
      Sep 28 at 16:38













    7















    7











    7







    $begingroup$

    My apologies to everyone, the original solution was wrong, I had the direction of the currents through R2 and R3 reversed. Solution now edited.




    If we Measure all voltages relative to the common junction of the 2 ohm resistor, R2, the 8A current source and the 3 ohm resistor then:



    1. Summing the currents at the node at the top right gives the 37V
      voltage source supplying a current of 7A. (15-8)

    2. At the - end of the 37V source the 2 ohm resistor has 6A flowing through it therefore the current through R2 is 1A to make up the 7A.

    3. The top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at -12V (2 ohms X 6A). and hence R2 = 12 ohms (12V / 1A).

    4. The node at the top right is at 45V as 15A flows through the 3 ohm resistor.

    5. The other end of R3 (the + end of the voltage source) is at 37-12 = +25V (the voltage across R2 and the 2 ohm resistor -12V + the 37V source)

    6. The voltage across R3, Vs = 20V (45-25).

    7. -7A is flowing through R3 and hence R3 = -20/7 ohms, or approximately -2.86 ohms.

    The more I look at it, the more I think the "-" in front of the 4 and 20 in the answers is just a dash (hyphen) not a minus sign.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$



    My apologies to everyone, the original solution was wrong, I had the direction of the currents through R2 and R3 reversed. Solution now edited.




    If we Measure all voltages relative to the common junction of the 2 ohm resistor, R2, the 8A current source and the 3 ohm resistor then:



    1. Summing the currents at the node at the top right gives the 37V
      voltage source supplying a current of 7A. (15-8)

    2. At the - end of the 37V source the 2 ohm resistor has 6A flowing through it therefore the current through R2 is 1A to make up the 7A.

    3. The top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at -12V (2 ohms X 6A). and hence R2 = 12 ohms (12V / 1A).

    4. The node at the top right is at 45V as 15A flows through the 3 ohm resistor.

    5. The other end of R3 (the + end of the voltage source) is at 37-12 = +25V (the voltage across R2 and the 2 ohm resistor -12V + the 37V source)

    6. The voltage across R3, Vs = 20V (45-25).

    7. -7A is flowing through R3 and hence R3 = -20/7 ohms, or approximately -2.86 ohms.

    The more I look at it, the more I think the "-" in front of the 4 and 20 in the answers is just a dash (hyphen) not a minus sign.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 28 at 16:39

























    answered Sep 28 at 0:31









    Peter JenningsPeter Jennings

    7681 gold badge1 silver badge11 bronze badges




    7681 gold badge1 silver badge11 bronze badges










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If the node at the top right is at +45V, the top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at **–**12V. Note the 6A current direction.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 11:31











    • $begingroup$
      There is something wrong with your solution. To see why try to solve it with the values you give.
      $endgroup$
      – G36
      Sep 28 at 11:39










    • $begingroup$
      Peter, there's another mistake in your solution. As you found out, the potential at the left end of R3 is +25V, while the potential at the right end of R3 is +45V. This means there has to be a current flow from right to left. This contradicts the sum current of the upper right node. That's what the OP's problem is about.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:08







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Anyway, if you pay attention at your steps 6 and 7 (everything up to that looks fine to me) you'll notice that the 7 A current across R3 is flowing from +25 V to +45 V. That's not how a normal resistor works.
      $endgroup$
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 28 at 16:23






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @IlmariKaronen OK you are right. My solution is still faulty, I'll put it right. I somehow wonder if the original book has an error. From the look of it it seems highly unlikely they would have been including negative resistors. Maybe someone didn't check the exercises carefully enough and made the same mistakes that I have.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Jennings
      Sep 28 at 16:38












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If the node at the top right is at +45V, the top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at **–**12V. Note the 6A current direction.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 11:31











    • $begingroup$
      There is something wrong with your solution. To see why try to solve it with the values you give.
      $endgroup$
      – G36
      Sep 28 at 11:39










    • $begingroup$
      Peter, there's another mistake in your solution. As you found out, the potential at the left end of R3 is +25V, while the potential at the right end of R3 is +45V. This means there has to be a current flow from right to left. This contradicts the sum current of the upper right node. That's what the OP's problem is about.
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:08







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Anyway, if you pay attention at your steps 6 and 7 (everything up to that looks fine to me) you'll notice that the 7 A current across R3 is flowing from +25 V to +45 V. That's not how a normal resistor works.
      $endgroup$
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 28 at 16:23






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @IlmariKaronen OK you are right. My solution is still faulty, I'll put it right. I somehow wonder if the original book has an error. From the look of it it seems highly unlikely they would have been including negative resistors. Maybe someone didn't check the exercises carefully enough and made the same mistakes that I have.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Jennings
      Sep 28 at 16:38







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    If the node at the top right is at +45V, the top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at **–**12V. Note the 6A current direction.
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 11:31





    $begingroup$
    If the node at the top right is at +45V, the top end of the 2 ohm resistor is at **–**12V. Note the 6A current direction.
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 11:31













    $begingroup$
    There is something wrong with your solution. To see why try to solve it with the values you give.
    $endgroup$
    – G36
    Sep 28 at 11:39




    $begingroup$
    There is something wrong with your solution. To see why try to solve it with the values you give.
    $endgroup$
    – G36
    Sep 28 at 11:39












    $begingroup$
    Peter, there's another mistake in your solution. As you found out, the potential at the left end of R3 is +25V, while the potential at the right end of R3 is +45V. This means there has to be a current flow from right to left. This contradicts the sum current of the upper right node. That's what the OP's problem is about.
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 15:08





    $begingroup$
    Peter, there's another mistake in your solution. As you found out, the potential at the left end of R3 is +25V, while the potential at the right end of R3 is +45V. This means there has to be a current flow from right to left. This contradicts the sum current of the upper right node. That's what the OP's problem is about.
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 15:08





    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Anyway, if you pay attention at your steps 6 and 7 (everything up to that looks fine to me) you'll notice that the 7 A current across R3 is flowing from +25 V to +45 V. That's not how a normal resistor works.
    $endgroup$
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Sep 28 at 16:23




    $begingroup$
    Anyway, if you pay attention at your steps 6 and 7 (everything up to that looks fine to me) you'll notice that the 7 A current across R3 is flowing from +25 V to +45 V. That's not how a normal resistor works.
    $endgroup$
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Sep 28 at 16:23




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @IlmariKaronen OK you are right. My solution is still faulty, I'll put it right. I somehow wonder if the original book has an error. From the look of it it seems highly unlikely they would have been including negative resistors. Maybe someone didn't check the exercises carefully enough and made the same mistakes that I have.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Jennings
    Sep 28 at 16:38




    $begingroup$
    @IlmariKaronen OK you are right. My solution is still faulty, I'll put it right. I somehow wonder if the original book has an error. From the look of it it seems highly unlikely they would have been including negative resistors. Maybe someone didn't check the exercises carefully enough and made the same mistakes that I have.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Jennings
    Sep 28 at 16:38











    5

















    $begingroup$

    To get the current and voltage values that were shown in the book.

    You indeed need a negative resistance in the circuit.
    The R3 needs to have negative resistance $R_3 = - frac20V7A = -2.857Omega$



    Because for the positive resistance we get this result:



    enter image description here



    As you can see the result is not even a close to the book solution.



    But if we use a "real" negative resistance (negative impedance converter) instead.



    The simulation result will match the book solution:



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I love this answer. (Could you add the actual currents in the 2Ω and 3Ω resistors in both cases?)
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:11











    • $begingroup$
      Oh, neat. I don't think I've seen a floating NIC before; I guess it's obvious it would be possible but I'd never considered it. (it isn't exactly something you need very often, if ever)
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:08















    5

















    $begingroup$

    To get the current and voltage values that were shown in the book.

    You indeed need a negative resistance in the circuit.
    The R3 needs to have negative resistance $R_3 = - frac20V7A = -2.857Omega$



    Because for the positive resistance we get this result:



    enter image description here



    As you can see the result is not even a close to the book solution.



    But if we use a "real" negative resistance (negative impedance converter) instead.



    The simulation result will match the book solution:



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I love this answer. (Could you add the actual currents in the 2Ω and 3Ω resistors in both cases?)
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:11











    • $begingroup$
      Oh, neat. I don't think I've seen a floating NIC before; I guess it's obvious it would be possible but I'd never considered it. (it isn't exactly something you need very often, if ever)
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:08













    5















    5











    5







    $begingroup$

    To get the current and voltage values that were shown in the book.

    You indeed need a negative resistance in the circuit.
    The R3 needs to have negative resistance $R_3 = - frac20V7A = -2.857Omega$



    Because for the positive resistance we get this result:



    enter image description here



    As you can see the result is not even a close to the book solution.



    But if we use a "real" negative resistance (negative impedance converter) instead.



    The simulation result will match the book solution:



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$



    To get the current and voltage values that were shown in the book.

    You indeed need a negative resistance in the circuit.
    The R3 needs to have negative resistance $R_3 = - frac20V7A = -2.857Omega$



    Because for the positive resistance we get this result:



    enter image description here



    As you can see the result is not even a close to the book solution.



    But if we use a "real" negative resistance (negative impedance converter) instead.



    The simulation result will match the book solution:



    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 28 at 14:22









    G36G36

    6,6981 gold badge7 silver badges12 bronze badges




    6,6981 gold badge7 silver badges12 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      I love this answer. (Could you add the actual currents in the 2Ω and 3Ω resistors in both cases?)
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:11











    • $begingroup$
      Oh, neat. I don't think I've seen a floating NIC before; I guess it's obvious it would be possible but I'd never considered it. (it isn't exactly something you need very often, if ever)
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:08
















    • $begingroup$
      I love this answer. (Could you add the actual currents in the 2Ω and 3Ω resistors in both cases?)
      $endgroup$
      – Janka
      Sep 28 at 15:11











    • $begingroup$
      Oh, neat. I don't think I've seen a floating NIC before; I guess it's obvious it would be possible but I'd never considered it. (it isn't exactly something you need very often, if ever)
      $endgroup$
      – Hearth
      Sep 29 at 11:08















    $begingroup$
    I love this answer. (Could you add the actual currents in the 2Ω and 3Ω resistors in both cases?)
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 15:11





    $begingroup$
    I love this answer. (Could you add the actual currents in the 2Ω and 3Ω resistors in both cases?)
    $endgroup$
    – Janka
    Sep 28 at 15:11













    $begingroup$
    Oh, neat. I don't think I've seen a floating NIC before; I guess it's obvious it would be possible but I'd never considered it. (it isn't exactly something you need very often, if ever)
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 29 at 11:08




    $begingroup$
    Oh, neat. I don't think I've seen a floating NIC before; I guess it's obvious it would be possible but I'd never considered it. (it isn't exactly something you need very often, if ever)
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Sep 29 at 11:08











    5

















    $begingroup$

    This won't answer the question, but will show how you find that R3 must have negative resistance.



    Here's the circuit diagram, with a couple of annotations:



    enter image description here



    First, from Ohm's law, we know that the voltage across the 2 ohm resistor is 12 V, and the voltage across the 3 ohm resistor is 45 V.



    If you take KVL around the loop indicated with the orange arrow, you get



    $$ -45 V + (-12 V) + 37 V - v_x = 0$$



    This gives you $v_x = -20 V$.



    Defining $I_x$ as the current through R3 (flowing left to right according to the passive sign convention), and using KCL at node "A" you get



    $$ I_x + 8 A - 15 A = 0$$



    From which, $I_x =7 A$.



    You now have



    $$R_3 = fracv_xI_x = frac-20 V7 A = -2.86 rm Omega$$



    It does not matter if you reverse the direction of $v_x$. If you do that (and also reverse the direction of $I_x$ to maintain the passive current convention) you'll just get $v_x=+20 V$ and $I_x=-7 A$.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$


















      5

















      $begingroup$

      This won't answer the question, but will show how you find that R3 must have negative resistance.



      Here's the circuit diagram, with a couple of annotations:



      enter image description here



      First, from Ohm's law, we know that the voltage across the 2 ohm resistor is 12 V, and the voltage across the 3 ohm resistor is 45 V.



      If you take KVL around the loop indicated with the orange arrow, you get



      $$ -45 V + (-12 V) + 37 V - v_x = 0$$



      This gives you $v_x = -20 V$.



      Defining $I_x$ as the current through R3 (flowing left to right according to the passive sign convention), and using KCL at node "A" you get



      $$ I_x + 8 A - 15 A = 0$$



      From which, $I_x =7 A$.



      You now have



      $$R_3 = fracv_xI_x = frac-20 V7 A = -2.86 rm Omega$$



      It does not matter if you reverse the direction of $v_x$. If you do that (and also reverse the direction of $I_x$ to maintain the passive current convention) you'll just get $v_x=+20 V$ and $I_x=-7 A$.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$
















        5















        5











        5







        $begingroup$

        This won't answer the question, but will show how you find that R3 must have negative resistance.



        Here's the circuit diagram, with a couple of annotations:



        enter image description here



        First, from Ohm's law, we know that the voltage across the 2 ohm resistor is 12 V, and the voltage across the 3 ohm resistor is 45 V.



        If you take KVL around the loop indicated with the orange arrow, you get



        $$ -45 V + (-12 V) + 37 V - v_x = 0$$



        This gives you $v_x = -20 V$.



        Defining $I_x$ as the current through R3 (flowing left to right according to the passive sign convention), and using KCL at node "A" you get



        $$ I_x + 8 A - 15 A = 0$$



        From which, $I_x =7 A$.



        You now have



        $$R_3 = fracv_xI_x = frac-20 V7 A = -2.86 rm Omega$$



        It does not matter if you reverse the direction of $v_x$. If you do that (and also reverse the direction of $I_x$ to maintain the passive current convention) you'll just get $v_x=+20 V$ and $I_x=-7 A$.






        share|improve this answer










        $endgroup$



        This won't answer the question, but will show how you find that R3 must have negative resistance.



        Here's the circuit diagram, with a couple of annotations:



        enter image description here



        First, from Ohm's law, we know that the voltage across the 2 ohm resistor is 12 V, and the voltage across the 3 ohm resistor is 45 V.



        If you take KVL around the loop indicated with the orange arrow, you get



        $$ -45 V + (-12 V) + 37 V - v_x = 0$$



        This gives you $v_x = -20 V$.



        Defining $I_x$ as the current through R3 (flowing left to right according to the passive sign convention), and using KCL at node "A" you get



        $$ I_x + 8 A - 15 A = 0$$



        From which, $I_x =7 A$.



        You now have



        $$R_3 = fracv_xI_x = frac-20 V7 A = -2.86 rm Omega$$



        It does not matter if you reverse the direction of $v_x$. If you do that (and also reverse the direction of $I_x$ to maintain the passive current convention) you'll just get $v_x=+20 V$ and $I_x=-7 A$.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 28 at 15:22









        The PhotonThe Photon

        97.3k3 gold badges118 silver badges229 bronze badges




        97.3k3 gold badges118 silver badges229 bronze badges
























            0

















            $begingroup$

            Ohmic negative resistance doesnt exist.However there is negative resistance.Zener diodes at their breakdown voltages have negative resistance since they create current by quantum tunneling.






            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$









            • 6




              $begingroup$
              Zener diodes don't exhibit negative resistance. I think you might be confusing them with tunnel diodes.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:33






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunneling is a type of negative resistance and zener diodes work with quantum tunneling in reverse breakdown.
              $endgroup$
              – Bright Future
              Sep 27 at 22:39







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunnelling is the cause of negative resistance in a tunnel diode, but tunnelling itself is not a type of negative resistance.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:47















            0

















            $begingroup$

            Ohmic negative resistance doesnt exist.However there is negative resistance.Zener diodes at their breakdown voltages have negative resistance since they create current by quantum tunneling.






            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$









            • 6




              $begingroup$
              Zener diodes don't exhibit negative resistance. I think you might be confusing them with tunnel diodes.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:33






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunneling is a type of negative resistance and zener diodes work with quantum tunneling in reverse breakdown.
              $endgroup$
              – Bright Future
              Sep 27 at 22:39







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunnelling is the cause of negative resistance in a tunnel diode, but tunnelling itself is not a type of negative resistance.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:47













            0















            0











            0







            $begingroup$

            Ohmic negative resistance doesnt exist.However there is negative resistance.Zener diodes at their breakdown voltages have negative resistance since they create current by quantum tunneling.






            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



            Ohmic negative resistance doesnt exist.However there is negative resistance.Zener diodes at their breakdown voltages have negative resistance since they create current by quantum tunneling.







            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer










            answered Sep 27 at 22:30









            Bright FutureBright Future

            393 bronze badges




            393 bronze badges










            • 6




              $begingroup$
              Zener diodes don't exhibit negative resistance. I think you might be confusing them with tunnel diodes.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:33






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunneling is a type of negative resistance and zener diodes work with quantum tunneling in reverse breakdown.
              $endgroup$
              – Bright Future
              Sep 27 at 22:39







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunnelling is the cause of negative resistance in a tunnel diode, but tunnelling itself is not a type of negative resistance.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:47












            • 6




              $begingroup$
              Zener diodes don't exhibit negative resistance. I think you might be confusing them with tunnel diodes.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:33






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunneling is a type of negative resistance and zener diodes work with quantum tunneling in reverse breakdown.
              $endgroup$
              – Bright Future
              Sep 27 at 22:39







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Quantum tunnelling is the cause of negative resistance in a tunnel diode, but tunnelling itself is not a type of negative resistance.
              $endgroup$
              – Hearth
              Sep 27 at 22:47







            6




            6




            $begingroup$
            Zener diodes don't exhibit negative resistance. I think you might be confusing them with tunnel diodes.
            $endgroup$
            – Hearth
            Sep 27 at 22:33




            $begingroup$
            Zener diodes don't exhibit negative resistance. I think you might be confusing them with tunnel diodes.
            $endgroup$
            – Hearth
            Sep 27 at 22:33




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Quantum tunneling is a type of negative resistance and zener diodes work with quantum tunneling in reverse breakdown.
            $endgroup$
            – Bright Future
            Sep 27 at 22:39





            $begingroup$
            Quantum tunneling is a type of negative resistance and zener diodes work with quantum tunneling in reverse breakdown.
            $endgroup$
            – Bright Future
            Sep 27 at 22:39





            4




            4




            $begingroup$
            Quantum tunnelling is the cause of negative resistance in a tunnel diode, but tunnelling itself is not a type of negative resistance.
            $endgroup$
            – Hearth
            Sep 27 at 22:47




            $begingroup$
            Quantum tunnelling is the cause of negative resistance in a tunnel diode, but tunnelling itself is not a type of negative resistance.
            $endgroup$
            – Hearth
            Sep 27 at 22:47


















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460605%2fis-negative-resistance-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?