What is temperature on a quantum level?Temperature effects on lead against radiationA physical explanation for negative kelvin temperaturesTemperature and particles and fieldsHow is temperature defined, and measured?How to make physical sense of negative temperaturesWhat is highest possible temperature?How are Quantum Mechanical energy levels related to atom shells?

Languages which changed their writing direction

Does a Light Domain cleric's Corona of Light feature produce sunlight?

Single word for delaying an unpleasant task

Xrite Colorchecker color specifications and 18% reflectance gray card

Why are dates (of writing or publication) missing in scientific papers?

Fiido D2: shock absorber broken

What does "arms" stand for in hotel names?

Are the graphical depictions in docs drawed in manual labour?

The correct capital G and J in cursive

Is it against a Terms of Service/End-User License Agreement to not read it?

Apple ID password compromised - 2FA rescued - What next?

In the top five, I'm odd

What are the catcode 11 / letter codepoints in Xe(La)Tex?

Did medieval stores have names?

What deck size is ideal?

Grainy 2D RegionIntersection Plot: How can I make it smoother?

Are medical malpractice lawsuits part of the public record?

What is the process of going from machine code to electrically controlling individual transistors?

Famous statistical wins and horror stories for teaching purposes

If a creature has advantage against spells and magical effects, is it resistant to magical attacks?

Is it usual for a US president to make specific comments about a UK Prime Minister's suitability during a general election?

Grouped and aligned expressions

How wealthy are China's Central Committee members?

Is it in line with the pali cannon suttas to accept other scriptures?



What is temperature on a quantum level?


Temperature effects on lead against radiationA physical explanation for negative kelvin temperaturesTemperature and particles and fieldsHow is temperature defined, and measured?How to make physical sense of negative temperaturesWhat is highest possible temperature?How are Quantum Mechanical energy levels related to atom shells?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









18














$begingroup$


When I was in high school, I learned that temperature is kinetic energy.



When I learned statistical physics, we learned that temperature is a statistical thing, and there was a formula for it.



Questions:



  1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?


  2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?


  3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?


  4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?










share|cite|improve this question












$endgroup$





















    18














    $begingroup$


    When I was in high school, I learned that temperature is kinetic energy.



    When I learned statistical physics, we learned that temperature is a statistical thing, and there was a formula for it.



    Questions:



    1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?


    2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?


    3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?


    4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?










    share|cite|improve this question












    $endgroup$

















      18












      18








      18


      4



      $begingroup$


      When I was in high school, I learned that temperature is kinetic energy.



      When I learned statistical physics, we learned that temperature is a statistical thing, and there was a formula for it.



      Questions:



      1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?


      2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?


      3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?


      4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?










      share|cite|improve this question












      $endgroup$




      When I was in high school, I learned that temperature is kinetic energy.



      When I learned statistical physics, we learned that temperature is a statistical thing, and there was a formula for it.



      Questions:



      1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?


      2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?


      3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?


      4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?







      quantum-mechanics statistical-mechanics temperature






      share|cite|improve this question
















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 14 at 1:05









      Nat

      3,8374 gold badges20 silver badges34 bronze badges




      3,8374 gold badges20 silver badges34 bronze badges










      asked Jul 12 at 10:56









      user1584421user1584421

      2121 silver badge7 bronze badges




      2121 silver badge7 bronze badges























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15
















          $begingroup$

          The temperature $T$ is defined via the relation
          $$T^-1=fracpartial Spartial E;,$$
          where $S$ and $E$ denote entropy and energy, respectively. At the quantum level there is a notion of temperature. As in the classical discussion, it requires the number of particles to be large. Clearly, (ideal) quantum gases do have a temperature (when in equilibrium).



          As for your questions:





          1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?




            The statistical mechanics definition is always the same. Of course, the computation differs.





          2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?




            It does not relate in a direct way. Of course, the average occupation numbers depend on the temperature.





          3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?




            Hard to answer because it is not clear what you mean by ground state.





          4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?




            This question doesn't make sense. There is no notion of an "infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe". Regardless of how many particles you have, in a finite system you will always have a finite number of levels, even if you call this system "universe".







          share|cite|improve this answer












          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            This seems rather unimportant to the main thrust of the question, but I don't think it's at all settled or universally agreed that there are a finite number of quantum states and energy levels in the universe.
            $endgroup$
            – aquirdturtle
            Jul 12 at 22:39










          • $begingroup$
            @aquirdturtle In order to use the notion of a temperature in its original sense, the system has to be in equilibrium. Our universe is not in thermal equilibrium. So all this does not apply anyway..
            $endgroup$
            – user178876
            Jul 13 at 6:03






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Nat Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – user178876
            Jul 14 at 5:02


















          10
















          $begingroup$

          To use a statistics mechanics framing, quantum mechanics describes how particles transition between the different microstates of your system. Temperature is a property that emerges from the macrostate of the system when it reaches equilibrium.



          Here “the system” is a collection of particles. So it does not make sense to talk about temperature of a single atom in isolation.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$






















            8
















            $begingroup$

            In classical mechanics, there does not always exist a well-defined notion of temperature (it does not make sense to define the temperature for a single free particle). Quantum mechanics exhibits similar behavior.



            Formally, we can define a thermal expectation value $langle rangle_beta$ which means, for some observable $mathcalO$,



            $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = langle mathcalO e^-beta H rangle $$



            where $langle rangle$ is the usual expectation value in quantum mechanics, and $beta$ is the inverse temperature (this definition should be properly normalized, which we will ignore for now). To understand what this means intuitively, we can expand the expectation value in the energy eigenbasis



            $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = sum_n langle n | mathcalO | nrangle e^-beta E_n $$



            What this means is that, for low temperature (large $beta$), the $e^-beta E_n$ term penalizes higher energy contributions, and the lower energy states contribute more to the thermal expectation value. If you're familiar with the notion of density matrices, you'll see that the thermal expectation value is just the expectation value for a system in the state $rho = e^-beta H$.



            If you want to, you can take this as just the definition of what temperature means in quantum mechanics. If we want to talk about a quantum system at some inverse temperature $beta$, we just replace all the normal expectation values with thermal expectation values. But this doesn't really explain why this definition is relevant (similar to how we sometimes just take the classical laws of thermodynamics as a given, without a statistical justification).



            How do we associate a temperature with a quantum state? For any quantum state with average energy $E$, we can define a temperature from the energy by solving



            $$E = langle H rangle_beta$$



            Note that this answers your question regarding the discreteness of energy levels - we can always consider the average energy of a state, which is continuous.



            Now, imagine that your quantum mechanical system is very large. It may turn out to be the case that the expectation values of operators restricted to a small region of the system look thermal - in other words, they take values close to $langle mathcalO rangle_beta$. If this is true, then we say that our system has thermalized, and it becomes useful to talk about thermal expectation values. It's easy to come up with states that don't satisfy this, but it turns out (rather non-trivially) that many states tend to become thermal if you evolve them in time long enough.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$






















              3
















              $begingroup$

              In classical mechanics, one can think of configurations ("microstates") of the system, each with definite position and momentum for all the particles. In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in any given configuration is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [1], where $E$ is the energy of that configuration and $k_mathrmB$ is Boltzmann's constant. (Proportional, not equal, because probabilities need to be normalized so that they add up to $1$. To normalize them you divide by the partition function, $Z$.)



              In quantum mechanics, you can't think of configurations with definite position and momentum any more. Instead, you have energy levels (i.e., eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator), and the statement needs to be rephrased in terms of them: In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in an energy level $E$ is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [2]. (The normalization constant is still $1/Z$.)



              For example, an isolated 1D harmonic oscillator has a set of energy levels, labeled by $n=0,1,2,ldots$, with energies $E_n propto n + frac12$. If you bring it to thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$ (by allowing it to exchange photons with a black body, for example), it then has a probability $p_n propto mathrme^-E_n/k_mathrmBT$ of being found in state $n$.



              In the limit that the temperature approaches zero, all of the probabilities go to zero except for the ground state, which approaches $1$. (You need to keep track of the normalization when taking this limit.) So a system at thermal equilibrium at zero temperature is always in its ground state.




              An important aside: Note that this doesn't mean that, in thermal equilibrium, a quantum system is in a superposition of energy eigenstates $lvert n rangle$ such as $lvert psi rangle = sqrtp_0 lvert 0 rangle + sqrtp_1 lvert 1 rangle + sqrtp_2 lvert 2 rangle + cdots $. In fact, a system in thermal equilibrium is not in a coherent superposition, but rather in an "incoherent mixture". Such mixtures can be described by a density matrix (though this formalism isn't usually needed for describing simple mixtures like thermal equilibrium).






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$






















                -2
















                $begingroup$

                A lot of questions. I’ll focus on the main question.




                What is temperature on a quantum level?




                The reason for the inner energy of a body is the exchange of radiation with other bodies. In detail, the subatomic particles of a body receive stochastic energy packets - photons - and emit photons again. A body is in equilibrium when the incident radiation corresponds to the outgoing radiation.



                For an "isolated" observed atom, the equality of the in and out of energy over a certain period of time is therefore related to the constancy of the temperature of the body to which the atom belongs. The same applies to a gas (if someone does not agree with the model of the isolated atom in a rigid body).






                share|cite|improve this answer










                $endgroup$
















                  Your Answer








                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "151"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: false,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: null,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader:
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  ,
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );














                  draft saved

                  draft discarded
















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491179%2fwhat-is-temperature-on-a-quantum-level%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown


























                  5 Answers
                  5






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  5 Answers
                  5






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  15
















                  $begingroup$

                  The temperature $T$ is defined via the relation
                  $$T^-1=fracpartial Spartial E;,$$
                  where $S$ and $E$ denote entropy and energy, respectively. At the quantum level there is a notion of temperature. As in the classical discussion, it requires the number of particles to be large. Clearly, (ideal) quantum gases do have a temperature (when in equilibrium).



                  As for your questions:





                  1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?




                    The statistical mechanics definition is always the same. Of course, the computation differs.





                  2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?




                    It does not relate in a direct way. Of course, the average occupation numbers depend on the temperature.





                  3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?




                    Hard to answer because it is not clear what you mean by ground state.





                  4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?




                    This question doesn't make sense. There is no notion of an "infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe". Regardless of how many particles you have, in a finite system you will always have a finite number of levels, even if you call this system "universe".







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $endgroup$










                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    This seems rather unimportant to the main thrust of the question, but I don't think it's at all settled or universally agreed that there are a finite number of quantum states and energy levels in the universe.
                    $endgroup$
                    – aquirdturtle
                    Jul 12 at 22:39










                  • $begingroup$
                    @aquirdturtle In order to use the notion of a temperature in its original sense, the system has to be in equilibrium. Our universe is not in thermal equilibrium. So all this does not apply anyway..
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 13 at 6:03






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Nat Thanks again!
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 14 at 5:02















                  15
















                  $begingroup$

                  The temperature $T$ is defined via the relation
                  $$T^-1=fracpartial Spartial E;,$$
                  where $S$ and $E$ denote entropy and energy, respectively. At the quantum level there is a notion of temperature. As in the classical discussion, it requires the number of particles to be large. Clearly, (ideal) quantum gases do have a temperature (when in equilibrium).



                  As for your questions:





                  1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?




                    The statistical mechanics definition is always the same. Of course, the computation differs.





                  2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?




                    It does not relate in a direct way. Of course, the average occupation numbers depend on the temperature.





                  3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?




                    Hard to answer because it is not clear what you mean by ground state.





                  4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?




                    This question doesn't make sense. There is no notion of an "infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe". Regardless of how many particles you have, in a finite system you will always have a finite number of levels, even if you call this system "universe".







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $endgroup$










                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    This seems rather unimportant to the main thrust of the question, but I don't think it's at all settled or universally agreed that there are a finite number of quantum states and energy levels in the universe.
                    $endgroup$
                    – aquirdturtle
                    Jul 12 at 22:39










                  • $begingroup$
                    @aquirdturtle In order to use the notion of a temperature in its original sense, the system has to be in equilibrium. Our universe is not in thermal equilibrium. So all this does not apply anyway..
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 13 at 6:03






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Nat Thanks again!
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 14 at 5:02













                  15














                  15










                  15







                  $begingroup$

                  The temperature $T$ is defined via the relation
                  $$T^-1=fracpartial Spartial E;,$$
                  where $S$ and $E$ denote entropy and energy, respectively. At the quantum level there is a notion of temperature. As in the classical discussion, it requires the number of particles to be large. Clearly, (ideal) quantum gases do have a temperature (when in equilibrium).



                  As for your questions:





                  1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?




                    The statistical mechanics definition is always the same. Of course, the computation differs.





                  2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?




                    It does not relate in a direct way. Of course, the average occupation numbers depend on the temperature.





                  3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?




                    Hard to answer because it is not clear what you mean by ground state.





                  4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?




                    This question doesn't make sense. There is no notion of an "infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe". Regardless of how many particles you have, in a finite system you will always have a finite number of levels, even if you call this system "universe".







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $endgroup$



                  The temperature $T$ is defined via the relation
                  $$T^-1=fracpartial Spartial E;,$$
                  where $S$ and $E$ denote entropy and energy, respectively. At the quantum level there is a notion of temperature. As in the classical discussion, it requires the number of particles to be large. Clearly, (ideal) quantum gases do have a temperature (when in equilibrium).



                  As for your questions:





                  1. What is temperature in terms of quantum mechanics? This is, how is temperature connected to quantum concepts like position, momentum, angular momentum, spin and energy levels?




                    The statistical mechanics definition is always the same. Of course, the computation differs.





                  2. How does temperature relate with the energy levels of an atom?




                    It does not relate in a direct way. Of course, the average occupation numbers depend on the temperature.





                  3. Is the ground state always at absolute zero?




                    Hard to answer because it is not clear what you mean by ground state.





                  4. If energy levels are discrete, how is this in play with the infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe?




                    This question doesn't make sense. There is no notion of an "infinite amount of temperatures that exist in the universe". Regardless of how many particles you have, in a finite system you will always have a finite number of levels, even if you call this system "universe".








                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer




                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 14 at 5:01

























                  answered Jul 12 at 13:03







                  user178876user178876

















                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    This seems rather unimportant to the main thrust of the question, but I don't think it's at all settled or universally agreed that there are a finite number of quantum states and energy levels in the universe.
                    $endgroup$
                    – aquirdturtle
                    Jul 12 at 22:39










                  • $begingroup$
                    @aquirdturtle In order to use the notion of a temperature in its original sense, the system has to be in equilibrium. Our universe is not in thermal equilibrium. So all this does not apply anyway..
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 13 at 6:03






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Nat Thanks again!
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 14 at 5:02












                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    This seems rather unimportant to the main thrust of the question, but I don't think it's at all settled or universally agreed that there are a finite number of quantum states and energy levels in the universe.
                    $endgroup$
                    – aquirdturtle
                    Jul 12 at 22:39










                  • $begingroup$
                    @aquirdturtle In order to use the notion of a temperature in its original sense, the system has to be in equilibrium. Our universe is not in thermal equilibrium. So all this does not apply anyway..
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 13 at 6:03






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Nat Thanks again!
                    $endgroup$
                    – user178876
                    Jul 14 at 5:02







                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  This seems rather unimportant to the main thrust of the question, but I don't think it's at all settled or universally agreed that there are a finite number of quantum states and energy levels in the universe.
                  $endgroup$
                  – aquirdturtle
                  Jul 12 at 22:39




                  $begingroup$
                  This seems rather unimportant to the main thrust of the question, but I don't think it's at all settled or universally agreed that there are a finite number of quantum states and energy levels in the universe.
                  $endgroup$
                  – aquirdturtle
                  Jul 12 at 22:39












                  $begingroup$
                  @aquirdturtle In order to use the notion of a temperature in its original sense, the system has to be in equilibrium. Our universe is not in thermal equilibrium. So all this does not apply anyway..
                  $endgroup$
                  – user178876
                  Jul 13 at 6:03




                  $begingroup$
                  @aquirdturtle In order to use the notion of a temperature in its original sense, the system has to be in equilibrium. Our universe is not in thermal equilibrium. So all this does not apply anyway..
                  $endgroup$
                  – user178876
                  Jul 13 at 6:03




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @Nat Thanks again!
                  $endgroup$
                  – user178876
                  Jul 14 at 5:02




                  $begingroup$
                  @Nat Thanks again!
                  $endgroup$
                  – user178876
                  Jul 14 at 5:02













                  10
















                  $begingroup$

                  To use a statistics mechanics framing, quantum mechanics describes how particles transition between the different microstates of your system. Temperature is a property that emerges from the macrostate of the system when it reaches equilibrium.



                  Here “the system” is a collection of particles. So it does not make sense to talk about temperature of a single atom in isolation.






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  $endgroup$



















                    10
















                    $begingroup$

                    To use a statistics mechanics framing, quantum mechanics describes how particles transition between the different microstates of your system. Temperature is a property that emerges from the macrostate of the system when it reaches equilibrium.



                    Here “the system” is a collection of particles. So it does not make sense to talk about temperature of a single atom in isolation.






                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    $endgroup$

















                      10














                      10










                      10







                      $begingroup$

                      To use a statistics mechanics framing, quantum mechanics describes how particles transition between the different microstates of your system. Temperature is a property that emerges from the macrostate of the system when it reaches equilibrium.



                      Here “the system” is a collection of particles. So it does not make sense to talk about temperature of a single atom in isolation.






                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$



                      To use a statistics mechanics framing, quantum mechanics describes how particles transition between the different microstates of your system. Temperature is a property that emerges from the macrostate of the system when it reaches equilibrium.



                      Here “the system” is a collection of particles. So it does not make sense to talk about temperature of a single atom in isolation.







                      share|cite|improve this answer













                      share|cite|improve this answer




                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Jul 12 at 11:30









                      boyfarrellboyfarrell

                      1,98610 silver badges12 bronze badges




                      1,98610 silver badges12 bronze badges
























                          8
















                          $begingroup$

                          In classical mechanics, there does not always exist a well-defined notion of temperature (it does not make sense to define the temperature for a single free particle). Quantum mechanics exhibits similar behavior.



                          Formally, we can define a thermal expectation value $langle rangle_beta$ which means, for some observable $mathcalO$,



                          $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = langle mathcalO e^-beta H rangle $$



                          where $langle rangle$ is the usual expectation value in quantum mechanics, and $beta$ is the inverse temperature (this definition should be properly normalized, which we will ignore for now). To understand what this means intuitively, we can expand the expectation value in the energy eigenbasis



                          $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = sum_n langle n | mathcalO | nrangle e^-beta E_n $$



                          What this means is that, for low temperature (large $beta$), the $e^-beta E_n$ term penalizes higher energy contributions, and the lower energy states contribute more to the thermal expectation value. If you're familiar with the notion of density matrices, you'll see that the thermal expectation value is just the expectation value for a system in the state $rho = e^-beta H$.



                          If you want to, you can take this as just the definition of what temperature means in quantum mechanics. If we want to talk about a quantum system at some inverse temperature $beta$, we just replace all the normal expectation values with thermal expectation values. But this doesn't really explain why this definition is relevant (similar to how we sometimes just take the classical laws of thermodynamics as a given, without a statistical justification).



                          How do we associate a temperature with a quantum state? For any quantum state with average energy $E$, we can define a temperature from the energy by solving



                          $$E = langle H rangle_beta$$



                          Note that this answers your question regarding the discreteness of energy levels - we can always consider the average energy of a state, which is continuous.



                          Now, imagine that your quantum mechanical system is very large. It may turn out to be the case that the expectation values of operators restricted to a small region of the system look thermal - in other words, they take values close to $langle mathcalO rangle_beta$. If this is true, then we say that our system has thermalized, and it becomes useful to talk about thermal expectation values. It's easy to come up with states that don't satisfy this, but it turns out (rather non-trivially) that many states tend to become thermal if you evolve them in time long enough.






                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          $endgroup$



















                            8
















                            $begingroup$

                            In classical mechanics, there does not always exist a well-defined notion of temperature (it does not make sense to define the temperature for a single free particle). Quantum mechanics exhibits similar behavior.



                            Formally, we can define a thermal expectation value $langle rangle_beta$ which means, for some observable $mathcalO$,



                            $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = langle mathcalO e^-beta H rangle $$



                            where $langle rangle$ is the usual expectation value in quantum mechanics, and $beta$ is the inverse temperature (this definition should be properly normalized, which we will ignore for now). To understand what this means intuitively, we can expand the expectation value in the energy eigenbasis



                            $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = sum_n langle n | mathcalO | nrangle e^-beta E_n $$



                            What this means is that, for low temperature (large $beta$), the $e^-beta E_n$ term penalizes higher energy contributions, and the lower energy states contribute more to the thermal expectation value. If you're familiar with the notion of density matrices, you'll see that the thermal expectation value is just the expectation value for a system in the state $rho = e^-beta H$.



                            If you want to, you can take this as just the definition of what temperature means in quantum mechanics. If we want to talk about a quantum system at some inverse temperature $beta$, we just replace all the normal expectation values with thermal expectation values. But this doesn't really explain why this definition is relevant (similar to how we sometimes just take the classical laws of thermodynamics as a given, without a statistical justification).



                            How do we associate a temperature with a quantum state? For any quantum state with average energy $E$, we can define a temperature from the energy by solving



                            $$E = langle H rangle_beta$$



                            Note that this answers your question regarding the discreteness of energy levels - we can always consider the average energy of a state, which is continuous.



                            Now, imagine that your quantum mechanical system is very large. It may turn out to be the case that the expectation values of operators restricted to a small region of the system look thermal - in other words, they take values close to $langle mathcalO rangle_beta$. If this is true, then we say that our system has thermalized, and it becomes useful to talk about thermal expectation values. It's easy to come up with states that don't satisfy this, but it turns out (rather non-trivially) that many states tend to become thermal if you evolve them in time long enough.






                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            $endgroup$

















                              8














                              8










                              8







                              $begingroup$

                              In classical mechanics, there does not always exist a well-defined notion of temperature (it does not make sense to define the temperature for a single free particle). Quantum mechanics exhibits similar behavior.



                              Formally, we can define a thermal expectation value $langle rangle_beta$ which means, for some observable $mathcalO$,



                              $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = langle mathcalO e^-beta H rangle $$



                              where $langle rangle$ is the usual expectation value in quantum mechanics, and $beta$ is the inverse temperature (this definition should be properly normalized, which we will ignore for now). To understand what this means intuitively, we can expand the expectation value in the energy eigenbasis



                              $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = sum_n langle n | mathcalO | nrangle e^-beta E_n $$



                              What this means is that, for low temperature (large $beta$), the $e^-beta E_n$ term penalizes higher energy contributions, and the lower energy states contribute more to the thermal expectation value. If you're familiar with the notion of density matrices, you'll see that the thermal expectation value is just the expectation value for a system in the state $rho = e^-beta H$.



                              If you want to, you can take this as just the definition of what temperature means in quantum mechanics. If we want to talk about a quantum system at some inverse temperature $beta$, we just replace all the normal expectation values with thermal expectation values. But this doesn't really explain why this definition is relevant (similar to how we sometimes just take the classical laws of thermodynamics as a given, without a statistical justification).



                              How do we associate a temperature with a quantum state? For any quantum state with average energy $E$, we can define a temperature from the energy by solving



                              $$E = langle H rangle_beta$$



                              Note that this answers your question regarding the discreteness of energy levels - we can always consider the average energy of a state, which is continuous.



                              Now, imagine that your quantum mechanical system is very large. It may turn out to be the case that the expectation values of operators restricted to a small region of the system look thermal - in other words, they take values close to $langle mathcalO rangle_beta$. If this is true, then we say that our system has thermalized, and it becomes useful to talk about thermal expectation values. It's easy to come up with states that don't satisfy this, but it turns out (rather non-trivially) that many states tend to become thermal if you evolve them in time long enough.






                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              $endgroup$



                              In classical mechanics, there does not always exist a well-defined notion of temperature (it does not make sense to define the temperature for a single free particle). Quantum mechanics exhibits similar behavior.



                              Formally, we can define a thermal expectation value $langle rangle_beta$ which means, for some observable $mathcalO$,



                              $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = langle mathcalO e^-beta H rangle $$



                              where $langle rangle$ is the usual expectation value in quantum mechanics, and $beta$ is the inverse temperature (this definition should be properly normalized, which we will ignore for now). To understand what this means intuitively, we can expand the expectation value in the energy eigenbasis



                              $$langle mathcalO rangle_beta = sum_n langle n | mathcalO | nrangle e^-beta E_n $$



                              What this means is that, for low temperature (large $beta$), the $e^-beta E_n$ term penalizes higher energy contributions, and the lower energy states contribute more to the thermal expectation value. If you're familiar with the notion of density matrices, you'll see that the thermal expectation value is just the expectation value for a system in the state $rho = e^-beta H$.



                              If you want to, you can take this as just the definition of what temperature means in quantum mechanics. If we want to talk about a quantum system at some inverse temperature $beta$, we just replace all the normal expectation values with thermal expectation values. But this doesn't really explain why this definition is relevant (similar to how we sometimes just take the classical laws of thermodynamics as a given, without a statistical justification).



                              How do we associate a temperature with a quantum state? For any quantum state with average energy $E$, we can define a temperature from the energy by solving



                              $$E = langle H rangle_beta$$



                              Note that this answers your question regarding the discreteness of energy levels - we can always consider the average energy of a state, which is continuous.



                              Now, imagine that your quantum mechanical system is very large. It may turn out to be the case that the expectation values of operators restricted to a small region of the system look thermal - in other words, they take values close to $langle mathcalO rangle_beta$. If this is true, then we say that our system has thermalized, and it becomes useful to talk about thermal expectation values. It's easy to come up with states that don't satisfy this, but it turns out (rather non-trivially) that many states tend to become thermal if you evolve them in time long enough.







                              share|cite|improve this answer













                              share|cite|improve this answer




                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Jul 12 at 14:15









                              Henry ShackletonHenry Shackleton

                              43610 bronze badges




                              43610 bronze badges
























                                  3
















                                  $begingroup$

                                  In classical mechanics, one can think of configurations ("microstates") of the system, each with definite position and momentum for all the particles. In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in any given configuration is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [1], where $E$ is the energy of that configuration and $k_mathrmB$ is Boltzmann's constant. (Proportional, not equal, because probabilities need to be normalized so that they add up to $1$. To normalize them you divide by the partition function, $Z$.)



                                  In quantum mechanics, you can't think of configurations with definite position and momentum any more. Instead, you have energy levels (i.e., eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator), and the statement needs to be rephrased in terms of them: In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in an energy level $E$ is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [2]. (The normalization constant is still $1/Z$.)



                                  For example, an isolated 1D harmonic oscillator has a set of energy levels, labeled by $n=0,1,2,ldots$, with energies $E_n propto n + frac12$. If you bring it to thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$ (by allowing it to exchange photons with a black body, for example), it then has a probability $p_n propto mathrme^-E_n/k_mathrmBT$ of being found in state $n$.



                                  In the limit that the temperature approaches zero, all of the probabilities go to zero except for the ground state, which approaches $1$. (You need to keep track of the normalization when taking this limit.) So a system at thermal equilibrium at zero temperature is always in its ground state.




                                  An important aside: Note that this doesn't mean that, in thermal equilibrium, a quantum system is in a superposition of energy eigenstates $lvert n rangle$ such as $lvert psi rangle = sqrtp_0 lvert 0 rangle + sqrtp_1 lvert 1 rangle + sqrtp_2 lvert 2 rangle + cdots $. In fact, a system in thermal equilibrium is not in a coherent superposition, but rather in an "incoherent mixture". Such mixtures can be described by a density matrix (though this formalism isn't usually needed for describing simple mixtures like thermal equilibrium).






                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                  $endgroup$



















                                    3
















                                    $begingroup$

                                    In classical mechanics, one can think of configurations ("microstates") of the system, each with definite position and momentum for all the particles. In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in any given configuration is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [1], where $E$ is the energy of that configuration and $k_mathrmB$ is Boltzmann's constant. (Proportional, not equal, because probabilities need to be normalized so that they add up to $1$. To normalize them you divide by the partition function, $Z$.)



                                    In quantum mechanics, you can't think of configurations with definite position and momentum any more. Instead, you have energy levels (i.e., eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator), and the statement needs to be rephrased in terms of them: In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in an energy level $E$ is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [2]. (The normalization constant is still $1/Z$.)



                                    For example, an isolated 1D harmonic oscillator has a set of energy levels, labeled by $n=0,1,2,ldots$, with energies $E_n propto n + frac12$. If you bring it to thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$ (by allowing it to exchange photons with a black body, for example), it then has a probability $p_n propto mathrme^-E_n/k_mathrmBT$ of being found in state $n$.



                                    In the limit that the temperature approaches zero, all of the probabilities go to zero except for the ground state, which approaches $1$. (You need to keep track of the normalization when taking this limit.) So a system at thermal equilibrium at zero temperature is always in its ground state.




                                    An important aside: Note that this doesn't mean that, in thermal equilibrium, a quantum system is in a superposition of energy eigenstates $lvert n rangle$ such as $lvert psi rangle = sqrtp_0 lvert 0 rangle + sqrtp_1 lvert 1 rangle + sqrtp_2 lvert 2 rangle + cdots $. In fact, a system in thermal equilibrium is not in a coherent superposition, but rather in an "incoherent mixture". Such mixtures can be described by a density matrix (though this formalism isn't usually needed for describing simple mixtures like thermal equilibrium).






                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    $endgroup$

















                                      3














                                      3










                                      3







                                      $begingroup$

                                      In classical mechanics, one can think of configurations ("microstates") of the system, each with definite position and momentum for all the particles. In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in any given configuration is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [1], where $E$ is the energy of that configuration and $k_mathrmB$ is Boltzmann's constant. (Proportional, not equal, because probabilities need to be normalized so that they add up to $1$. To normalize them you divide by the partition function, $Z$.)



                                      In quantum mechanics, you can't think of configurations with definite position and momentum any more. Instead, you have energy levels (i.e., eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator), and the statement needs to be rephrased in terms of them: In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in an energy level $E$ is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [2]. (The normalization constant is still $1/Z$.)



                                      For example, an isolated 1D harmonic oscillator has a set of energy levels, labeled by $n=0,1,2,ldots$, with energies $E_n propto n + frac12$. If you bring it to thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$ (by allowing it to exchange photons with a black body, for example), it then has a probability $p_n propto mathrme^-E_n/k_mathrmBT$ of being found in state $n$.



                                      In the limit that the temperature approaches zero, all of the probabilities go to zero except for the ground state, which approaches $1$. (You need to keep track of the normalization when taking this limit.) So a system at thermal equilibrium at zero temperature is always in its ground state.




                                      An important aside: Note that this doesn't mean that, in thermal equilibrium, a quantum system is in a superposition of energy eigenstates $lvert n rangle$ such as $lvert psi rangle = sqrtp_0 lvert 0 rangle + sqrtp_1 lvert 1 rangle + sqrtp_2 lvert 2 rangle + cdots $. In fact, a system in thermal equilibrium is not in a coherent superposition, but rather in an "incoherent mixture". Such mixtures can be described by a density matrix (though this formalism isn't usually needed for describing simple mixtures like thermal equilibrium).






                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      $endgroup$



                                      In classical mechanics, one can think of configurations ("microstates") of the system, each with definite position and momentum for all the particles. In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in any given configuration is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [1], where $E$ is the energy of that configuration and $k_mathrmB$ is Boltzmann's constant. (Proportional, not equal, because probabilities need to be normalized so that they add up to $1$. To normalize them you divide by the partition function, $Z$.)



                                      In quantum mechanics, you can't think of configurations with definite position and momentum any more. Instead, you have energy levels (i.e., eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator), and the statement needs to be rephrased in terms of them: In thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$, the probability of finding the system in an energy level $E$ is proportional to $mathrme^-E/k_mathrmBT$ [2]. (The normalization constant is still $1/Z$.)



                                      For example, an isolated 1D harmonic oscillator has a set of energy levels, labeled by $n=0,1,2,ldots$, with energies $E_n propto n + frac12$. If you bring it to thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$ (by allowing it to exchange photons with a black body, for example), it then has a probability $p_n propto mathrme^-E_n/k_mathrmBT$ of being found in state $n$.



                                      In the limit that the temperature approaches zero, all of the probabilities go to zero except for the ground state, which approaches $1$. (You need to keep track of the normalization when taking this limit.) So a system at thermal equilibrium at zero temperature is always in its ground state.




                                      An important aside: Note that this doesn't mean that, in thermal equilibrium, a quantum system is in a superposition of energy eigenstates $lvert n rangle$ such as $lvert psi rangle = sqrtp_0 lvert 0 rangle + sqrtp_1 lvert 1 rangle + sqrtp_2 lvert 2 rangle + cdots $. In fact, a system in thermal equilibrium is not in a coherent superposition, but rather in an "incoherent mixture". Such mixtures can be described by a density matrix (though this formalism isn't usually needed for describing simple mixtures like thermal equilibrium).







                                      share|cite|improve this answer













                                      share|cite|improve this answer




                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Jul 13 at 8:18









                                      Stephen PowellStephen Powell

                                      5504 silver badges8 bronze badges




                                      5504 silver badges8 bronze badges
























                                          -2
















                                          $begingroup$

                                          A lot of questions. I’ll focus on the main question.




                                          What is temperature on a quantum level?




                                          The reason for the inner energy of a body is the exchange of radiation with other bodies. In detail, the subatomic particles of a body receive stochastic energy packets - photons - and emit photons again. A body is in equilibrium when the incident radiation corresponds to the outgoing radiation.



                                          For an "isolated" observed atom, the equality of the in and out of energy over a certain period of time is therefore related to the constancy of the temperature of the body to which the atom belongs. The same applies to a gas (if someone does not agree with the model of the isolated atom in a rigid body).






                                          share|cite|improve this answer










                                          $endgroup$



















                                            -2
















                                            $begingroup$

                                            A lot of questions. I’ll focus on the main question.




                                            What is temperature on a quantum level?




                                            The reason for the inner energy of a body is the exchange of radiation with other bodies. In detail, the subatomic particles of a body receive stochastic energy packets - photons - and emit photons again. A body is in equilibrium when the incident radiation corresponds to the outgoing radiation.



                                            For an "isolated" observed atom, the equality of the in and out of energy over a certain period of time is therefore related to the constancy of the temperature of the body to which the atom belongs. The same applies to a gas (if someone does not agree with the model of the isolated atom in a rigid body).






                                            share|cite|improve this answer










                                            $endgroup$

















                                              -2














                                              -2










                                              -2







                                              $begingroup$

                                              A lot of questions. I’ll focus on the main question.




                                              What is temperature on a quantum level?




                                              The reason for the inner energy of a body is the exchange of radiation with other bodies. In detail, the subatomic particles of a body receive stochastic energy packets - photons - and emit photons again. A body is in equilibrium when the incident radiation corresponds to the outgoing radiation.



                                              For an "isolated" observed atom, the equality of the in and out of energy over a certain period of time is therefore related to the constancy of the temperature of the body to which the atom belongs. The same applies to a gas (if someone does not agree with the model of the isolated atom in a rigid body).






                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              $endgroup$



                                              A lot of questions. I’ll focus on the main question.




                                              What is temperature on a quantum level?




                                              The reason for the inner energy of a body is the exchange of radiation with other bodies. In detail, the subatomic particles of a body receive stochastic energy packets - photons - and emit photons again. A body is in equilibrium when the incident radiation corresponds to the outgoing radiation.



                                              For an "isolated" observed atom, the equality of the in and out of energy over a certain period of time is therefore related to the constancy of the temperature of the body to which the atom belongs. The same applies to a gas (if someone does not agree with the model of the isolated atom in a rigid body).







                                              share|cite|improve this answer













                                              share|cite|improve this answer




                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              answered Jul 13 at 5:43









                                              HolgerFiedlerHolgerFiedler

                                              4,6363 gold badges14 silver badges44 bronze badges




                                              4,6363 gold badges14 silver badges44 bronze badges































                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid


                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function ()
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491179%2fwhat-is-temperature-on-a-quantum-level%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown









                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                                                  Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                                                  Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?