Historically, were women trained for obligatory wars? Or did they serve some other military function?Is belief in Midrashim optional?When and why did the black velvet yarmulke become the standard for some communities?How did Paro know that “…that they may serve Me” meant sacrifices and not some other form of service?What did they do for shiurim before modern measurements?Source that Tisha B'av is the day of mourning for all tragedies, even if they did not fall out then?

String Operation to Split on Punctuation

Proofreading a novel: is it okay to use a question mark with an exclamation mark - "?!"

Did smallpox emerge in 1580?

Can the Bountiful Luck halfling racial feat be used multiple times in one round?

Is it realistic that an advanced species isn't good at war?

Do you say "good game" after a game in which your opponent played poorly?

How to remind myself to lock my doors

PhD Level Linear Programming Textbooks

Suspicious crontab entry running 'xribfa4' every 15 minutes

Do I need to explicitly handle negative numbers or zero when summing squared digits?

Is a light year a different distance if measured from a moving object?

What should I upgrade first?

Raspberry pi run commands on boot

Why is coffee provided during big chess events when it contains a banned substance?

How to execute a project with two resources where you need three resources?

Future of iTunes and audio files in its library

Match the blocks

Is there a way to substitute a Bracket for a Matrix Rather than a Parentheses When Using Traditional Form

Can you take Bowwow out after returning him to MeowMeow?

Is data science mathematically interesting?

Can the bass be used instead of drums?

What are the consequences for downstream actors of redistributing a work under a wider CC license than the copyright holder authorized?

What is the word for things that work even when they aren't working (e.g. escalators)?

SSD or HDD for server



Historically, were women trained for obligatory wars? Or did they serve some other military function?


Is belief in Midrashim optional?When and why did the black velvet yarmulke become the standard for some communities?How did Paro know that “…that they may serve Me” meant sacrifices and not some other form of service?What did they do for shiurim before modern measurements?Source that Tisha B'av is the day of mourning for all tragedies, even if they did not fall out then?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








13

















Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? It sounds like at least some of the women of Reuven and Gad stayed home during the conquest of the land.



If they fought, (how) were they trained?



I do know that Devorah not only fought but led troops, but as a prophetess she might have had special circumstances.










share|improve this question




























  • Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:26






  • 1





    As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.

    – DonielF
    Apr 29 at 2:52











  • @DonielF IMSMC Yael was not an Israelite...

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:28











  • sefaria.org/Judges.4.8?lang=bi&with=Commentary&lang2=en

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:37






  • 1





    Consider Numbers 32:26

    – Double AA
    Apr 29 at 16:17

















13

















Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? It sounds like at least some of the women of Reuven and Gad stayed home during the conquest of the land.



If they fought, (how) were they trained?



I do know that Devorah not only fought but led troops, but as a prophetess she might have had special circumstances.










share|improve this question




























  • Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:26






  • 1





    As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.

    – DonielF
    Apr 29 at 2:52











  • @DonielF IMSMC Yael was not an Israelite...

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:28











  • sefaria.org/Judges.4.8?lang=bi&with=Commentary&lang2=en

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:37






  • 1





    Consider Numbers 32:26

    – Double AA
    Apr 29 at 16:17













13












13








13


2






Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? It sounds like at least some of the women of Reuven and Gad stayed home during the conquest of the land.



If they fought, (how) were they trained?



I do know that Devorah not only fought but led troops, but as a prophetess she might have had special circumstances.










share|improve this question
















Sotah 8:7 says that for obligatory wars all go out to fight, "even a bridegroom from his chamber and a bride from her canopy". Historically, was this in fact our practice? Did women participate in the conquest of the land (which Rabbi Yehudah says was an obligatory war) or in defending it before we were conquered and the temples destroyed? Did women fight alongside the men, or did they participate in ways that didn't involve fighting directly? It sounds like at least some of the women of Reuven and Gad stayed home during the conquest of the land.



If they fought, (how) were they trained?



I do know that Devorah not only fought but led troops, but as a prophetess she might have had special circumstances.







history women army-military-war tractate-sotah devorah






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited Aug 16 at 12:12









Alex

30.6k3 gold badges77 silver badges160 bronze badges




30.6k3 gold badges77 silver badges160 bronze badges










asked Apr 29 at 1:41









Monica CellioMonica Cellio

39.9k8 gold badges87 silver badges288 bronze badges




39.9k8 gold badges87 silver badges288 bronze badges















  • Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:26






  • 1





    As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.

    – DonielF
    Apr 29 at 2:52











  • @DonielF IMSMC Yael was not an Israelite...

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:28











  • sefaria.org/Judges.4.8?lang=bi&with=Commentary&lang2=en

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:37






  • 1





    Consider Numbers 32:26

    – Double AA
    Apr 29 at 16:17

















  • Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:26






  • 1





    As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.

    – DonielF
    Apr 29 at 2:52











  • @DonielF IMSMC Yael was not an Israelite...

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:28











  • sefaria.org/Judges.4.8?lang=bi&with=Commentary&lang2=en

    – Loewian
    Apr 29 at 4:37






  • 1





    Consider Numbers 32:26

    – Double AA
    Apr 29 at 16:17
















Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.

– sam
Apr 29 at 2:26





Another such proof that only men went to war is from the passuk Devarim 20:8 "מי האיש הירא..." the passuk refers only to men.

– sam
Apr 29 at 2:26




1




1





As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.

– DonielF
Apr 29 at 2:52





As a support for your question, Kiddushin 2b states that “it’s the way of men to go to war, but not the way of women to go to war.” Similarly, Midrash Mishlei 31:5 says that Yael used a tent peg to kill Sisera because she didn’t carry any weapons, as per the prohibition against women wearing men’s garments.

– DonielF
Apr 29 at 2:52













@DonielF IMSMC Yael was not an Israelite...

– Loewian
Apr 29 at 4:28





@DonielF IMSMC Yael was not an Israelite...

– Loewian
Apr 29 at 4:28













sefaria.org/Judges.4.8?lang=bi&with=Commentary&lang2=en

– Loewian
Apr 29 at 4:37





sefaria.org/Judges.4.8?lang=bi&with=Commentary&lang2=en

– Loewian
Apr 29 at 4:37




1




1





Consider Numbers 32:26

– Double AA
Apr 29 at 16:17





Consider Numbers 32:26

– Double AA
Apr 29 at 16:17










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















17


















In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: “Is it the way of women to wage war?” And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arab(?) women:




אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות




Note that R. David Ibn Zimra did not invent the idea that it is not the way of women to wage war. The Talmud in Kiddushin (2b) explicitly states this:




התם דבמלחמה קאי דדרכו של איש לעשות מלחמה ואין דרכה של אשה לעשות מלחמה כתב לה בלשון זכר



There, however, the reference is to war, and it is the practice of man to wage war, not of woman — therefore the masculine is employed. (Soncino translation)







share|improve this answer




























  • You beat me to it,was about to type this

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:16











  • @sam ברוך שכוונתי

    – Alex
    Apr 29 at 2:17











  • It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:18


















11


















Yachin there:




אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת. ‏




A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.






share|improve this answer




























  • Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?

    – Monica Cellio
    Apr 29 at 2:29






  • 3





    it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions

    – kouty
    Apr 29 at 2:30



















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









17


















In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: “Is it the way of women to wage war?” And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arab(?) women:




אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות




Note that R. David Ibn Zimra did not invent the idea that it is not the way of women to wage war. The Talmud in Kiddushin (2b) explicitly states this:




התם דבמלחמה קאי דדרכו של איש לעשות מלחמה ואין דרכה של אשה לעשות מלחמה כתב לה בלשון זכר



There, however, the reference is to war, and it is the practice of man to wage war, not of woman — therefore the masculine is employed. (Soncino translation)







share|improve this answer




























  • You beat me to it,was about to type this

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:16











  • @sam ברוך שכוונתי

    – Alex
    Apr 29 at 2:17











  • It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:18















17


















In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: “Is it the way of women to wage war?” And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arab(?) women:




אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות




Note that R. David Ibn Zimra did not invent the idea that it is not the way of women to wage war. The Talmud in Kiddushin (2b) explicitly states this:




התם דבמלחמה קאי דדרכו של איש לעשות מלחמה ואין דרכה של אשה לעשות מלחמה כתב לה בלשון זכר



There, however, the reference is to war, and it is the practice of man to wage war, not of woman — therefore the masculine is employed. (Soncino translation)







share|improve this answer




























  • You beat me to it,was about to type this

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:16











  • @sam ברוך שכוונתי

    – Alex
    Apr 29 at 2:17











  • It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:18













17














17










17









In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: “Is it the way of women to wage war?” And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arab(?) women:




אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות




Note that R. David Ibn Zimra did not invent the idea that it is not the way of women to wage war. The Talmud in Kiddushin (2b) explicitly states this:




התם דבמלחמה קאי דדרכו של איש לעשות מלחמה ואין דרכה של אשה לעשות מלחמה כתב לה בלשון זכר



There, however, the reference is to war, and it is the practice of man to wage war, not of woman — therefore the masculine is employed. (Soncino translation)







share|improve this answer
















In his commentary to Rambam's codification of this law (Hilchot Melachim 7:5), R. David Ibn Zimra asks: “Is it the way of women to wage war?” And he cites the verse (Psalms 45:14) "All glorious is the king's daughter within the palace" in support of this. He then suggests that the women were (not actively fighting, but) supplying food and water to their husbands, and he notes that this is the current practice of the Arab(?) women:




אלא דקשה וכי דרך הנשים לעשות מלחמה דקתני וכלה מחופתה והא כתיב כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה וי"ל דה"ק כיון דחתן יוצא מחדרו כלה יוצאה מחופתה שאינה נוהגת ימי חופה ואפשר דבמלחמת מצוה הנשים היו מספקות מים ומזון לבעליהן וכן המנהג היום בערביות




Note that R. David Ibn Zimra did not invent the idea that it is not the way of women to wage war. The Talmud in Kiddushin (2b) explicitly states this:




התם דבמלחמה קאי דדרכו של איש לעשות מלחמה ואין דרכה של אשה לעשות מלחמה כתב לה בלשון זכר



There, however, the reference is to war, and it is the practice of man to wage war, not of woman — therefore the masculine is employed. (Soncino translation)








share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jul 4 at 1:35

























answered Apr 29 at 2:12









AlexAlex

30.6k3 gold badges77 silver badges160 bronze badges




30.6k3 gold badges77 silver badges160 bronze badges















  • You beat me to it,was about to type this

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:16











  • @sam ברוך שכוונתי

    – Alex
    Apr 29 at 2:17











  • It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:18

















  • You beat me to it,was about to type this

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:16











  • @sam ברוך שכוונתי

    – Alex
    Apr 29 at 2:17











  • It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus

    – sam
    Apr 29 at 2:18
















You beat me to it,was about to type this

– sam
Apr 29 at 2:16





You beat me to it,was about to type this

– sam
Apr 29 at 2:16













@sam ברוך שכוונתי

– Alex
Apr 29 at 2:17





@sam ברוך שכוונתי

– Alex
Apr 29 at 2:17













It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus

– sam
Apr 29 at 2:18





It also should be noted that according to the Rambam a woman may be able to fight durimg a milchmes mitzvah,but not reshus

– sam
Apr 29 at 2:18













11


















Yachin there:




אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת. ‏




A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.






share|improve this answer




























  • Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?

    – Monica Cellio
    Apr 29 at 2:29






  • 3





    it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions

    – kouty
    Apr 29 at 2:30















11


















Yachin there:




אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת. ‏




A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.






share|improve this answer




























  • Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?

    – Monica Cellio
    Apr 29 at 2:29






  • 3





    it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions

    – kouty
    Apr 29 at 2:30













11














11










11









Yachin there:




אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת. ‏




A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.






share|improve this answer
















Yachin there:




אשה לאו בת מלחמה. רק לספק מזון ולתקן הדרכים אף היא יוצאת. ‏




A woman is not able to combat, she did only provide food and repair roads.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 29 at 5:33









alicht

7,8713 gold badges11 silver badges43 bronze badges




7,8713 gold badges11 silver badges43 bronze badges










answered Apr 29 at 2:25









koutykouty

18.3k3 gold badges21 silver badges51 bronze badges




18.3k3 gold badges21 silver badges51 bronze badges















  • Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?

    – Monica Cellio
    Apr 29 at 2:29






  • 3





    it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions

    – kouty
    Apr 29 at 2:30

















  • Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?

    – Monica Cellio
    Apr 29 at 2:29






  • 3





    it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions

    – kouty
    Apr 29 at 2:30
















Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?

– Monica Cellio
Apr 29 at 2:29





Thank you. Who/what is Yachin?

– Monica Cellio
Apr 29 at 2:29




3




3





it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions

– kouty
Apr 29 at 2:30





it is the comment Tiferet Israel on tne mishna who is divided in Yachin, for paraphrease and Boaz for extended discussions

– kouty
Apr 29 at 2:30



Popular posts from this blog

Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü