Load average is high after adding second driveLoad average high on only one of 16 HP workstationsDual boot on Hp Envy UltrabookVery slow copying Ubuntu 12.10, AHCIExtremely low HDD read/write speedCut power to CD drive to save battery?SSD extremely slow when connected with internal SATA, ok with external USBDual Boot Windows 10 and Lubuntu hard drive not showing upHow to reset and detect plug-in HDD/SSD via IDE or SATA without rebooting?18.04.2 LTS dual boot with Win 10 Pro is causing Windows corruption

Impeachment jury tampering

Why don't my appliances work when my tester shows voltage at the outlets?

Explanation of tac --before

Using parent's property and will as evidence of assets

Multiline Tag command

Can I select any of my published paper in journal for book chapter

What does "speed checked" mean?

C function to check the validity of a date in DD.MM.YYYY format

Continents with simplex noise

Is it possible to have a healthy work-life balance as a professor?

Create a program that prints the amount of characters it has, in words

Who axiomatized classical mechanics in 1949?

How did the T-850 still function after it removed its second battery?

Reviewer wants me to do massive amount of work, the result would be a different article. Should I tell that to the editor?

Mysql - Average price for top 10% cheapest volume (algorithm help)

help solving for delta in epsilon delta proof

Wrapping tikz environment with savebox

Travel with Expired Greek Passport from UK to Greece and Return

Alternatives to boxes

Where do overtones in a 555 generated square wave come from?

indent and noindent: details from Knuth's The TeXbook

Is velocity a valid measure of team and process improvement?

How much transparency about runway should I expect from startup employer?

Building a phone charger 500 years ago



Load average is high after adding second drive


Load average high on only one of 16 HP workstationsDual boot on Hp Envy UltrabookVery slow copying Ubuntu 12.10, AHCIExtremely low HDD read/write speedCut power to CD drive to save battery?SSD extremely slow when connected with internal SATA, ok with external USBDual Boot Windows 10 and Lubuntu hard drive not showing upHow to reset and detect plug-in HDD/SSD via IDE or SATA without rebooting?18.04.2 LTS dual boot with Win 10 Pro is causing Windows corruption






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









4

















My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.



First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.



  • Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.


  • However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:



    sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
    SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)


  • Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.


Problem



The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.



What did I done?



  • I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.

What else?



  • CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.

  • If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.

  • If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.









share|improve this question




























  • So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 6:24











  • That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a kworker running with the state of D might be related to luks.

    – Ravexina
    Jul 10 at 13:27











  • Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:29











  • Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:32











  • For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.

    – Doug Smythies
    Jul 10 at 14:04

















4

















My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.



First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.



  • Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.


  • However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:



    sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
    SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)


  • Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.


Problem



The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.



What did I done?



  • I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.

What else?



  • CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.

  • If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.

  • If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.









share|improve this question




























  • So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 6:24











  • That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a kworker running with the state of D might be related to luks.

    – Ravexina
    Jul 10 at 13:27











  • Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:29











  • Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:32











  • For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.

    – Doug Smythies
    Jul 10 at 14:04













4












4








4








My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.



First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.



  • Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.


  • However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:



    sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
    SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)


  • Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.


Problem



The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.



What did I done?



  • I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.

What else?



  • CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.

  • If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.

  • If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.









share|improve this question

















My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.



First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.



  • Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.


  • However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:



    sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
    SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)


  • Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.


Problem



The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.



What did I done?



  • I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.

What else?



  • CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.

  • If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.

  • If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.






hard-drive ssd sata optical






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 10 at 14:40







Ravexina

















asked Jun 8 at 18:49









RavexinaRavexina

36.6k15 gold badges100 silver badges129 bronze badges




36.6k15 gold badges100 silver badges129 bronze badges















  • So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 6:24











  • That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a kworker running with the state of D might be related to luks.

    – Ravexina
    Jul 10 at 13:27











  • Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:29











  • Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:32











  • For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.

    – Doug Smythies
    Jul 10 at 14:04

















  • So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 6:24











  • That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a kworker running with the state of D might be related to luks.

    – Ravexina
    Jul 10 at 13:27











  • Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:29











  • Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?

    – Robert Riedl
    Jul 10 at 13:32











  • For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.

    – Doug Smythies
    Jul 10 at 14:04
















So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?

– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24





So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?

– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24













That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a kworker running with the state of D might be related to luks.

– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27





That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a kworker running with the state of D might be related to luks.

– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27













Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.

– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29





Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.

– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29













Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?

– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32





Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?

– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32













For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.

– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04





For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.

– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3







+50











This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.



Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.



this






share|improve this answer

































    4


















    There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:



    • kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive

    enter image description here



    The solution from top-voted answer was this command:



    echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F


    In the link grep was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:



    grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/



    Load Average



    If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:



    $ cat /proc/loadavg
    0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366


    It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:




    • The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
      things get worse.



    Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:



    .063 - .095 - .113



    because I have 8 CPUs.



    I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:



    conky nvidia.png



    Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:



    .150 .177 .143


    The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.



    Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:



    1.200 1.416 1.144


    Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:



    $ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) 


    Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.






    share|improve this answer




























    • of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?

      – Robert Riedl
      Jul 10 at 11:38











    • @RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?

      – WinEunuuchs2Unix
      Jul 10 at 11:48












    • So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this - A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle - would directly contradict it ?

      – Robert Riedl
      Jul 10 at 11:52











    • @RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)

      – WinEunuuchs2Unix
      Jul 10 at 11:54







    • 1





      @Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.

      – WinEunuuchs2Unix
      Jul 10 at 23:39












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1149647%2fload-average-is-high-after-adding-second-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3







    +50











    This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.



    Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.



    this






    share|improve this answer






























      3







      +50











      This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.



      Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.



      this






      share|improve this answer




























        3







        +50







        3







        +50



        3






        +50





        This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.



        Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.



        this






        share|improve this answer














        This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.



        Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.



        this







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered Jul 10 at 14:13









        Robert RiedlRobert Riedl

        3,58611 silver badges30 bronze badges




        3,58611 silver badges30 bronze badges


























            4


















            There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:



            • kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive

            enter image description here



            The solution from top-voted answer was this command:



            echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F


            In the link grep was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:



            grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/



            Load Average



            If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:



            $ cat /proc/loadavg
            0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366


            It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:




            • The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
              things get worse.



            Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:



            .063 - .095 - .113



            because I have 8 CPUs.



            I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:



            conky nvidia.png



            Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:



            .150 .177 .143


            The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.



            Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:



            1.200 1.416 1.144


            Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:



            $ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) 


            Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.






            share|improve this answer




























            • of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:38











            • @RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:48












            • So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this - A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle - would directly contradict it ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:52











            • @RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:54







            • 1





              @Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 23:39















            4


















            There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:



            • kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive

            enter image description here



            The solution from top-voted answer was this command:



            echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F


            In the link grep was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:



            grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/



            Load Average



            If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:



            $ cat /proc/loadavg
            0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366


            It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:




            • The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
              things get worse.



            Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:



            .063 - .095 - .113



            because I have 8 CPUs.



            I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:



            conky nvidia.png



            Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:



            .150 .177 .143


            The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.



            Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:



            1.200 1.416 1.144


            Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:



            $ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) 


            Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.






            share|improve this answer




























            • of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:38











            • @RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:48












            • So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this - A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle - would directly contradict it ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:52











            • @RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:54







            • 1





              @Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 23:39













            4














            4










            4









            There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:



            • kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive

            enter image description here



            The solution from top-voted answer was this command:



            echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F


            In the link grep was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:



            grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/



            Load Average



            If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:



            $ cat /proc/loadavg
            0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366


            It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:




            • The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
              things get worse.



            Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:



            .063 - .095 - .113



            because I have 8 CPUs.



            I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:



            conky nvidia.png



            Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:



            .150 .177 .143


            The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.



            Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:



            1.200 1.416 1.144


            Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:



            $ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) 


            Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.






            share|improve this answer
















            There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:



            • kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive

            enter image description here



            The solution from top-voted answer was this command:



            echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F


            In the link grep was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:



            grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/



            Load Average



            If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:



            $ cat /proc/loadavg
            0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366


            It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:




            • The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
              things get worse.



            Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:



            .063 - .095 - .113



            because I have 8 CPUs.



            I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:



            conky nvidia.png



            Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:



            .150 .177 .143


            The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.



            Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:



            1.200 1.416 1.144


            Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:



            $ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) 


            Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.







            share|improve this answer















            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer








            edited Jul 10 at 23:38

























            answered Jul 10 at 10:59









            WinEunuuchs2UnixWinEunuuchs2Unix

            59.7k18 gold badges119 silver badges234 bronze badges




            59.7k18 gold badges119 silver badges234 bronze badges















            • of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:38











            • @RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:48












            • So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this - A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle - would directly contradict it ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:52











            • @RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:54







            • 1





              @Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 23:39

















            • of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:38











            • @RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:48












            • So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this - A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle - would directly contradict it ?

              – Robert Riedl
              Jul 10 at 11:52











            • @RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 11:54







            • 1





              @Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.

              – WinEunuuchs2Unix
              Jul 10 at 23:39
















            of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?

            – Robert Riedl
            Jul 10 at 11:38





            of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?

            – Robert Riedl
            Jul 10 at 11:38













            @RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?

            – WinEunuuchs2Unix
            Jul 10 at 11:48






            @RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?

            – WinEunuuchs2Unix
            Jul 10 at 11:48














            So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this - A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle - would directly contradict it ?

            – Robert Riedl
            Jul 10 at 11:52





            So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this - A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle - would directly contradict it ?

            – Robert Riedl
            Jul 10 at 11:52













            @RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)

            – WinEunuuchs2Unix
            Jul 10 at 11:54






            @RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)

            – WinEunuuchs2Unix
            Jul 10 at 11:54





            1




            1





            @Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.

            – WinEunuuchs2Unix
            Jul 10 at 23:39





            @Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.

            – WinEunuuchs2Unix
            Jul 10 at 23:39


















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1149647%2fload-average-is-high-after-adding-second-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?