Load average is high after adding second driveLoad average high on only one of 16 HP workstationsDual boot on Hp Envy UltrabookVery slow copying Ubuntu 12.10, AHCIExtremely low HDD read/write speedCut power to CD drive to save battery?SSD extremely slow when connected with internal SATA, ok with external USBDual Boot Windows 10 and Lubuntu hard drive not showing upHow to reset and detect plug-in HDD/SSD via IDE or SATA without rebooting?18.04.2 LTS dual boot with Win 10 Pro is causing Windows corruption
Impeachment jury tampering
Why don't my appliances work when my tester shows voltage at the outlets?
Explanation of tac --before
Using parent's property and will as evidence of assets
Multiline Tag command
Can I select any of my published paper in journal for book chapter
What does "speed checked" mean?
C function to check the validity of a date in DD.MM.YYYY format
Continents with simplex noise
Is it possible to have a healthy work-life balance as a professor?
Create a program that prints the amount of characters it has, in words
Who axiomatized classical mechanics in 1949?
How did the T-850 still function after it removed its second battery?
Reviewer wants me to do massive amount of work, the result would be a different article. Should I tell that to the editor?
Mysql - Average price for top 10% cheapest volume (algorithm help)
help solving for delta in epsilon delta proof
Wrapping tikz environment with savebox
Travel with Expired Greek Passport from UK to Greece and Return
Alternatives to boxes
Where do overtones in a 555 generated square wave come from?
indent and noindent: details from Knuth's The TeXbook
Is velocity a valid measure of team and process improvement?
How much transparency about runway should I expect from startup employer?
Building a phone charger 500 years ago
Load average is high after adding second drive
Load average high on only one of 16 HP workstationsDual boot on Hp Envy UltrabookVery slow copying Ubuntu 12.10, AHCIExtremely low HDD read/write speedCut power to CD drive to save battery?SSD extremely slow when connected with internal SATA, ok with external USBDual Boot Windows 10 and Lubuntu hard drive not showing upHow to reset and detect plug-in HDD/SSD via IDE or SATA without rebooting?18.04.2 LTS dual boot with Win 10 Pro is causing Windows corruption
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.
First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.
- Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.
However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:
sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.
Problem
The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.
What did I done?
- I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.
What else?
- CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.
- If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.
- If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.
hard-drive ssd sata optical
|
show 2 more comments
My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.
First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.
- Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.
However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:
sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.
Problem
The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.
What did I done?
- I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.
What else?
- CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.
- If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.
- If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.
hard-drive ssd sata optical
So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24
That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always akworker
running with the state ofD
might be related to luks.
– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27
Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29
Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32
For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.
– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04
|
show 2 more comments
My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.
First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.
- Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.
However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:
sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.
Problem
The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.
What did I done?
- I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.
What else?
- CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.
- If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.
- If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.
hard-drive ssd sata optical
My laptop was working fine and its load average was between 0.2 - 0.5 (and around 0.02 while doing nothing) until I decide to upgrade it with an SSD.
First I replaced my HDD with SSD, moving HDD into a HDD Caddy, removing the optical drive and putting HDD there instead.
- Both my SSD and HDD are capable of working with SATA III interfaces.
However my HDD is working at SATA 2 mode:
sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep SATA
SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)Seems my optical drive interface is SATA 2.
Problem
The problem is whenever there is something in HDD Caddy (SSD, HDD, Doesn't matter) load average while doing nothing is around 1.5 - 2 and while system is just booted up is around 4.
What did I done?
- I have tried any combination of setup nothing takes any effects.
What else?
- CPU usage is normal and no process is consuming the CPU.
- If I only use one disk as the main hard drive load average is normal.
- If I even use one disk at the optical drive place, I get high load average.
hard-drive ssd sata optical
hard-drive ssd sata optical
edited Jul 10 at 14:40
Ravexina
asked Jun 8 at 18:49
RavexinaRavexina
36.6k15 gold badges100 silver badges129 bronze badges
36.6k15 gold badges100 silver badges129 bronze badges
So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24
That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always akworker
running with the state ofD
might be related to luks.
– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27
Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29
Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32
For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.
– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04
|
show 2 more comments
So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24
That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always akworker
running with the state ofD
might be related to luks.
– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27
Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29
Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32
For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.
– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04
So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24
So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24
That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a
kworker
running with the state of D
might be related to luks.– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27
That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a
kworker
running with the state of D
might be related to luks.– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27
Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29
Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29
Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32
Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32
For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.
– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04
For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.
– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.
Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.
add a comment
|
There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:
- kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive
The solution from top-voted answer was this command:
echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F
In the link grep
was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:
grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/
Load Average
If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:
$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366
It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:
- The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
things get worse.
Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:
.063 - .095 - .113
because I have 8 CPUs.
I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:
Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:
.150 .177 .143
The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.
Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:
1.200 1.416 1.144
Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:
$ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;)
Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.
of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:38
@RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:48
So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this -A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle
- would directly contradict it ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:52
@RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:54
1
@Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 23:39
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1149647%2fload-average-is-high-after-adding-second-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.
Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.
add a comment
|
This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.
Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.
add a comment
|
This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.
Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.
This could be related to the HDD caddy you use.
Please see if it has a button or a switch, in order to change the state of the caddy.
answered Jul 10 at 14:13
Robert RiedlRobert Riedl
3,58611 silver badges30 bronze badges
3,58611 silver badges30 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:
- kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive
The solution from top-voted answer was this command:
echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F
In the link grep
was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:
grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/
Load Average
If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:
$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366
It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:
- The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
things get worse.
Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:
.063 - .095 - .113
because I have 8 CPUs.
I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:
Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:
.150 .177 .143
The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.
Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:
1.200 1.416 1.144
Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:
$ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;)
Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.
of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:38
@RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:48
So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this -A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle
- would directly contradict it ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:52
@RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:54
1
@Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 23:39
|
show 3 more comments
There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:
- kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive
The solution from top-voted answer was this command:
echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F
In the link grep
was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:
grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/
Load Average
If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:
$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366
It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:
- The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
things get worse.
Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:
.063 - .095 - .113
because I have 8 CPUs.
I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:
Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:
.150 .177 .143
The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.
Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:
1.200 1.416 1.144
Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:
$ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;)
Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.
of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:38
@RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:48
So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this -A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle
- would directly contradict it ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:52
@RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:54
1
@Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 23:39
|
show 3 more comments
There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:
- kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive
The solution from top-voted answer was this command:
echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F
In the link grep
was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:
grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/
Load Average
If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:
$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366
It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:
- The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
things get worse.
Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:
.063 - .095 - .113
because I have 8 CPUs.
I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:
Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:
.150 .177 .143
The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.
Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:
1.200 1.416 1.144
Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:
$ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;)
Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.
There is an excellent Q&A with the same problem:
- kworker consumes high cpu for external hard drive
The solution from top-voted answer was this command:
echo "disable" > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe6F
In the link grep
was used to discover the interrupt causing grief:
grep . -r /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/
Load Average
If you look at your system load average for 1-5-15 minutes like this:
$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.50 0.76 0.91 2/1037 14366
It's reporting .5, .76 and .91. From Understanding Linux CPU Load - when should you be worried? it says:
- The "Need to Look into it" Rule of Thumb: 0.70 If your load average is staying above > 0.70, it's time to investigate before
things get worse.
Further in the article it will mention something like the load average for all your CPUs are added together but not divided by the number of CPUs to get an average of all CPUs. You have to do this manually so the true values are:
.063 - .095 - .113
because I have 8 CPUs.
I prefer to use Conky to display this in real-time though:
Notice the 4th line from the bottom display 1-5-15 minute load averages as:
.150 .177 .143
The 1 minute load average of .15 equates to 15% which matches the All CPU percentage value two lines above the Load Average.
Without diving by 8 I'd have a heart attack because I would be seeing:
1.200 1.416 1.144
Conky automatically divides for me with the Conky code:
$ bc -l $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $2' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;) $execpi .001 (awk 'printf "%s/", $3' /proc/loadavg; grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo;)
Of course not everyone uses conky probably only 1% of Linux users but for those out there that love Conky like me, you might find this code helpful.
edited Jul 10 at 23:38
answered Jul 10 at 10:59
WinEunuuchs2UnixWinEunuuchs2Unix
59.7k18 gold badges119 silver badges234 bronze badges
59.7k18 gold badges119 silver badges234 bronze badges
of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:38
@RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:48
So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this -A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle
- would directly contradict it ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:52
@RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:54
1
@Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 23:39
|
show 3 more comments
of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:38
@RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:48
So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this -A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle
- would directly contradict it ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:52
@RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:54
1
@Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 23:39
of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:38
of course load averages can be higher than 1.0 - why do you think otherwise ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:38
@RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:48
@RobertRiedl superuser.com/questions/1402079/… Did you down vote me just over load average comment?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:48
So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this -
A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle
- would directly contradict it ?– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:52
So.. nowhere does it state that you can't have a higher load average than 1.0. In fact this -
A value greater than 1.0 means it's getting more than it can handle
- would directly contradict it ?– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 11:52
@RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:54
@RobertRiedl You need to divide by 8 is what it confirms... I did rephrase answer to put in "generally" though :)
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 11:54
1
1
@Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 23:39
@Ravexina I've marveled at the many times you've helped other users and I'm glad you got helped this time.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 10 at 23:39
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1149647%2fload-average-is-high-after-adding-second-drive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
So, If you have basically your old setup which had an 0.2-0.5 load, but instead of a CD/DVD drive you insert an SSD, the load goes up ? Have you tried to check where the load is coming from (i.e. iowait, etc) ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 6:24
That's correct, If I put anything in place of CD/DVD drive load goes up. Even if there is only SSD there with no other drive load average is always higher that on 1. I couldn't find anything interesting however there is always a
kworker
running with the state ofD
might be related to luks.– Ravexina
Jul 10 at 13:27
Check out the link by WinEunuuchs2Unix. It might be related to the caddy you use.
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:29
Does your HDD caddy have any buttons to switches ?
– Robert Riedl
Jul 10 at 13:32
For uninterruptible sleep investigation, try some suggestions from here.
– Doug Smythies
Jul 10 at 14:04