What was redacted in the Yellowhammer report? (Point 15)What are the UK's “constitutional requirements” for Article 50 notification of withdrawal from EU?What if Holyrood rejects its version of the Great Repeal Bill?What's the point in holding a second Brexit referendum?Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?To what extent do precedents in Westminster systems apply in other countries that use it?Could Boris Johnson theoretically ignore any legislation passed to prevent no-deal brexit?If the UK Gov. has authority to cancel article 50 notification, why do they have to agree an extension with the EUIf the UK government doesn't ask for article 50 extension, can parliament do it instead?Is there any indication that the now released 'Operation Yellowhammer' merely a summary?Can Parliament be compelled to let the UK leave the EU on October 31st?

My friend made a riddle I can’t solve. Wanna help?

Who are the strongest non-professional GMs?

How did Gdoley Israel react to the landing on the Moon?

Make me speak L33T

Balancing empathy and deferring to the syllabus in teaching responsibilities

Why does the hyperref documentation suggest using gather instead of equation?

Is it acceptable for the secretary to have full access to our entire Outlook agenda?

Why dont electrical receptacles have more than one ground?

Is this Astral Rat a reasonable magic pet?

Translate the French quote "Il n’y a pas d'amour, il n’y a que des preuves d’amour" to English?

Where to stand for this winter view in Grindelwald, Switzerland?

Why should I invest so much in 401(k)?

What was the sound coming from below the feet of the Death Eaters at Malfoy Manor?

Where does Thor get his hammer when he's not using it?

How do I negotiate salary when returning to a position I just left?

What's politest way of writing you got no reply?

Cos Method in Finance / Practice

What is the name for the integer part of a enum?

Can a Barbarian/Wizard multiclass cast a spell with a magic item while raging?

What is the fate of SLA fairings jettisoned from lunar mission spacecrafts?

How do I defeat the Molduga

C - wrapping globals in a struct?

Game company goes bankrupt, another company wants to make a sequel how?

How can I convince my child to write?



What was redacted in the Yellowhammer report? (Point 15)


What are the UK's “constitutional requirements” for Article 50 notification of withdrawal from EU?What if Holyrood rejects its version of the Great Repeal Bill?What's the point in holding a second Brexit referendum?Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?To what extent do precedents in Westminster systems apply in other countries that use it?Could Boris Johnson theoretically ignore any legislation passed to prevent no-deal brexit?If the UK Gov. has authority to cancel article 50 notification, why do they have to agree an extension with the EUIf the UK government doesn't ask for article 50 extension, can parliament do it instead?Is there any indication that the now released 'Operation Yellowhammer' merely a summary?Can Parliament be compelled to let the UK leave the EU on October 31st?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








15


















The UK government has released a redacted copy of the Yellowhammer report.



Leaving aside the legality of it being redacted (Parliament requested full disclosure), are there any indications of what the redacted section (point 15) is about?










share|improve this question

































    15


















    The UK government has released a redacted copy of the Yellowhammer report.



    Leaving aside the legality of it being redacted (Parliament requested full disclosure), are there any indications of what the redacted section (point 15) is about?










    share|improve this question





























      15













      15









      15








      The UK government has released a redacted copy of the Yellowhammer report.



      Leaving aside the legality of it being redacted (Parliament requested full disclosure), are there any indications of what the redacted section (point 15) is about?










      share|improve this question
















      The UK government has released a redacted copy of the Yellowhammer report.



      Leaving aside the legality of it being redacted (Parliament requested full disclosure), are there any indications of what the redacted section (point 15) is about?







      united-kingdom brexit






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Sep 13 at 4:17







      Denis de Bernardy

















      asked Sep 12 at 7:37









      Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

      28.4k7 gold badges81 silver badges110 bronze badges




      28.4k7 gold badges81 silver badges110 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          22



















          The document is nearly identical to the one leaked to the Sunday Times in August.



          The two main differences appear to be that:



          1. The leaked document says it's a baseline scenario while the released document says it's a worst case scenario.


          2. Point 15 is not redacted in the leaked document.


          Assuming the point identical in both documents, one of the Sunday Times journalists (the one who reported the leak if I'm not mistaking) tweeted point 15's contents (emphasis mine):




          Facing EU tariffs makes petrol exports to the EU uncompetitive. Industry had plans to mitigate the impact on refinery margins and profitability but UK Government policy to set petrol import tariffs at 0% inadvertently undermines these plans. This leads to significant financial losses and announcement of two refinery closures (and transition to import terminals) and direct job losses (about 2000). Resulting strike action at refineries would lead to disruptions to fuel availability for 1-2 weeks in the regions directly supplied by the refineries.







          share|improve this answer























          • 17





            I think this is called the Streisand effect.

            – JJ for Transparency and Monica
            Sep 12 at 7:53



















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          22



















          The document is nearly identical to the one leaked to the Sunday Times in August.



          The two main differences appear to be that:



          1. The leaked document says it's a baseline scenario while the released document says it's a worst case scenario.


          2. Point 15 is not redacted in the leaked document.


          Assuming the point identical in both documents, one of the Sunday Times journalists (the one who reported the leak if I'm not mistaking) tweeted point 15's contents (emphasis mine):




          Facing EU tariffs makes petrol exports to the EU uncompetitive. Industry had plans to mitigate the impact on refinery margins and profitability but UK Government policy to set petrol import tariffs at 0% inadvertently undermines these plans. This leads to significant financial losses and announcement of two refinery closures (and transition to import terminals) and direct job losses (about 2000). Resulting strike action at refineries would lead to disruptions to fuel availability for 1-2 weeks in the regions directly supplied by the refineries.







          share|improve this answer























          • 17





            I think this is called the Streisand effect.

            – JJ for Transparency and Monica
            Sep 12 at 7:53















          22



















          The document is nearly identical to the one leaked to the Sunday Times in August.



          The two main differences appear to be that:



          1. The leaked document says it's a baseline scenario while the released document says it's a worst case scenario.


          2. Point 15 is not redacted in the leaked document.


          Assuming the point identical in both documents, one of the Sunday Times journalists (the one who reported the leak if I'm not mistaking) tweeted point 15's contents (emphasis mine):




          Facing EU tariffs makes petrol exports to the EU uncompetitive. Industry had plans to mitigate the impact on refinery margins and profitability but UK Government policy to set petrol import tariffs at 0% inadvertently undermines these plans. This leads to significant financial losses and announcement of two refinery closures (and transition to import terminals) and direct job losses (about 2000). Resulting strike action at refineries would lead to disruptions to fuel availability for 1-2 weeks in the regions directly supplied by the refineries.







          share|improve this answer























          • 17





            I think this is called the Streisand effect.

            – JJ for Transparency and Monica
            Sep 12 at 7:53













          22















          22











          22









          The document is nearly identical to the one leaked to the Sunday Times in August.



          The two main differences appear to be that:



          1. The leaked document says it's a baseline scenario while the released document says it's a worst case scenario.


          2. Point 15 is not redacted in the leaked document.


          Assuming the point identical in both documents, one of the Sunday Times journalists (the one who reported the leak if I'm not mistaking) tweeted point 15's contents (emphasis mine):




          Facing EU tariffs makes petrol exports to the EU uncompetitive. Industry had plans to mitigate the impact on refinery margins and profitability but UK Government policy to set petrol import tariffs at 0% inadvertently undermines these plans. This leads to significant financial losses and announcement of two refinery closures (and transition to import terminals) and direct job losses (about 2000). Resulting strike action at refineries would lead to disruptions to fuel availability for 1-2 weeks in the regions directly supplied by the refineries.







          share|improve this answer
















          The document is nearly identical to the one leaked to the Sunday Times in August.



          The two main differences appear to be that:



          1. The leaked document says it's a baseline scenario while the released document says it's a worst case scenario.


          2. Point 15 is not redacted in the leaked document.


          Assuming the point identical in both documents, one of the Sunday Times journalists (the one who reported the leak if I'm not mistaking) tweeted point 15's contents (emphasis mine):




          Facing EU tariffs makes petrol exports to the EU uncompetitive. Industry had plans to mitigate the impact on refinery margins and profitability but UK Government policy to set petrol import tariffs at 0% inadvertently undermines these plans. This leads to significant financial losses and announcement of two refinery closures (and transition to import terminals) and direct job losses (about 2000). Resulting strike action at refineries would lead to disruptions to fuel availability for 1-2 weeks in the regions directly supplied by the refineries.








          share|improve this answer















          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer








          edited Sep 12 at 7:55

























          answered Sep 12 at 7:37









          Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

          28.4k7 gold badges81 silver badges110 bronze badges




          28.4k7 gold badges81 silver badges110 bronze badges










          • 17





            I think this is called the Streisand effect.

            – JJ for Transparency and Monica
            Sep 12 at 7:53












          • 17





            I think this is called the Streisand effect.

            – JJ for Transparency and Monica
            Sep 12 at 7:53







          17




          17





          I think this is called the Streisand effect.

          – JJ for Transparency and Monica
          Sep 12 at 7:53





          I think this is called the Streisand effect.

          – JJ for Transparency and Monica
          Sep 12 at 7:53



          Popular posts from this blog

          Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

          How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

          Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü