A version of includeonly for inputReference label with included file and relaxed clearpageLarge document edited by a dozen peopleProblem include-ing multiple .tex filessubimport and includeonlylist processing for file to inputTypeset output from Maxima using input, specifically left justifydisplay/print input filename at top of each page in draft mode

Why my vim doesn't support hex color code?

How to prevent humanity from using alien spaceships and technology exclusively?

What is separation between policy and mechanism?

Tamagawa numbers

SQL Server CUs vs SPs + CUs?

What does “critical but stable” mean?

How do wraiths control their bodies?

5yrs old being bossy... Is this too much or tolerable at this age?

Do not combine certain elements in Split or SplitBy

Advent calendar

How can I ensure consistency in web design?

How can communicating in human language with an unconscious alien species be treated as an attack?

Is self-awareness or consciousness actually an evolutionary disadvantage?

How to explain my complicated family background to people that I don't know very well?

Should we stop differentiating between ln and log?

How to cross the Atlantic in a post-apocalyptic world

Should I invest ~18k being 19 years old?

How scammy are cashback sites?

What can Scotland legally do to get independence?

What does a reduction gearbox do in a turbofan engine?

Why did a decent number of London constituencies vote to Leave?

In Excel, is there a shortcut to hide a wide range of columns without mouse-dragging?

Modeling in pure math

Was Jumanji intended to be a co-op game?



A version of includeonly for input


Reference label with included file and relaxed clearpageLarge document edited by a dozen peopleProblem include-ing multiple .tex filessubimport and includeonlylist processing for file to inputTypeset output from Maxima using input, specifically left justifydisplay/print input filename at top of each page in draft mode






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









4


















I have a pretty long paper that is getting sluggish to compile. Different sections are imported with input. I'd like to have something like includeonly but that works on input rather than include commands (input works better for the paper as it does not start sections on new pages, etc.).



A reasonable option would be to use include for the draft and swap back later, but thought I would ask here first if there is a command like includeonly for input. (By the way, I tried includeonly combined with input but indeed it doesn't work.)










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    You could use something like letmyinputinclude in the preamble and then change it to letmyinputinput for the final version. If you don't want to risk patching internal commands.

    – cfr
    Oct 2 at 3:44











  • I don't really get though why this question is a duplicate of the other question? I understand from the nice flashy graphic on the other question why the answer that was once here is not perhaps the best solution, but I am left with the question of how best to omit inputs in that case (the other question does not address this at all). @cfr, that is a reasonable solution, thanks!

    – badroit
    Oct 3 at 2:59






  • 1





    I agree. This is certainly NOT a duplicate of the other question. If it is to be marked as a duplicate, it should be a duplicate of the question linked from the one it is marked as currently. I can only think David marked it as a duplicate on the grounds that the answer is the same, but even that strikes me as incorrect. For one thing, you're open to other solutions than eliminating clearpage from include so 'don't do this' may apply to Alan Munn's answer, but it needn't apply to all answers to this question.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:07











  • That is, if it is a duplicate, it's a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/1209065/3186474.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:09











  • But that question isn't on TeX SE so I don't know it can be marked as a duplicate here.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:11

















4


















I have a pretty long paper that is getting sluggish to compile. Different sections are imported with input. I'd like to have something like includeonly but that works on input rather than include commands (input works better for the paper as it does not start sections on new pages, etc.).



A reasonable option would be to use include for the draft and swap back later, but thought I would ask here first if there is a command like includeonly for input. (By the way, I tried includeonly combined with input but indeed it doesn't work.)










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    You could use something like letmyinputinclude in the preamble and then change it to letmyinputinput for the final version. If you don't want to risk patching internal commands.

    – cfr
    Oct 2 at 3:44











  • I don't really get though why this question is a duplicate of the other question? I understand from the nice flashy graphic on the other question why the answer that was once here is not perhaps the best solution, but I am left with the question of how best to omit inputs in that case (the other question does not address this at all). @cfr, that is a reasonable solution, thanks!

    – badroit
    Oct 3 at 2:59






  • 1





    I agree. This is certainly NOT a duplicate of the other question. If it is to be marked as a duplicate, it should be a duplicate of the question linked from the one it is marked as currently. I can only think David marked it as a duplicate on the grounds that the answer is the same, but even that strikes me as incorrect. For one thing, you're open to other solutions than eliminating clearpage from include so 'don't do this' may apply to Alan Munn's answer, but it needn't apply to all answers to this question.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:07











  • That is, if it is a duplicate, it's a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/1209065/3186474.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:09











  • But that question isn't on TeX SE so I don't know it can be marked as a duplicate here.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:11













4













4









4


1






I have a pretty long paper that is getting sluggish to compile. Different sections are imported with input. I'd like to have something like includeonly but that works on input rather than include commands (input works better for the paper as it does not start sections on new pages, etc.).



A reasonable option would be to use include for the draft and swap back later, but thought I would ask here first if there is a command like includeonly for input. (By the way, I tried includeonly combined with input but indeed it doesn't work.)










share|improve this question
















I have a pretty long paper that is getting sluggish to compile. Different sections are imported with input. I'd like to have something like includeonly but that works on input rather than include commands (input works better for the paper as it does not start sections on new pages, etc.).



A reasonable option would be to use include for the draft and swap back later, but thought I would ask here first if there is a command like includeonly for input. (By the way, I tried includeonly combined with input but indeed it doesn't work.)







input include






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 2 at 0:32









Alan Munn

175k30 gold badges448 silver badges741 bronze badges




175k30 gold badges448 silver badges741 bronze badges










asked Oct 2 at 0:28









badroitbadroit

6,1178 gold badges34 silver badges53 bronze badges




6,1178 gold badges34 silver badges53 bronze badges










  • 2





    You could use something like letmyinputinclude in the preamble and then change it to letmyinputinput for the final version. If you don't want to risk patching internal commands.

    – cfr
    Oct 2 at 3:44











  • I don't really get though why this question is a duplicate of the other question? I understand from the nice flashy graphic on the other question why the answer that was once here is not perhaps the best solution, but I am left with the question of how best to omit inputs in that case (the other question does not address this at all). @cfr, that is a reasonable solution, thanks!

    – badroit
    Oct 3 at 2:59






  • 1





    I agree. This is certainly NOT a duplicate of the other question. If it is to be marked as a duplicate, it should be a duplicate of the question linked from the one it is marked as currently. I can only think David marked it as a duplicate on the grounds that the answer is the same, but even that strikes me as incorrect. For one thing, you're open to other solutions than eliminating clearpage from include so 'don't do this' may apply to Alan Munn's answer, but it needn't apply to all answers to this question.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:07











  • That is, if it is a duplicate, it's a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/1209065/3186474.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:09











  • But that question isn't on TeX SE so I don't know it can be marked as a duplicate here.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:11












  • 2





    You could use something like letmyinputinclude in the preamble and then change it to letmyinputinput for the final version. If you don't want to risk patching internal commands.

    – cfr
    Oct 2 at 3:44











  • I don't really get though why this question is a duplicate of the other question? I understand from the nice flashy graphic on the other question why the answer that was once here is not perhaps the best solution, but I am left with the question of how best to omit inputs in that case (the other question does not address this at all). @cfr, that is a reasonable solution, thanks!

    – badroit
    Oct 3 at 2:59






  • 1





    I agree. This is certainly NOT a duplicate of the other question. If it is to be marked as a duplicate, it should be a duplicate of the question linked from the one it is marked as currently. I can only think David marked it as a duplicate on the grounds that the answer is the same, but even that strikes me as incorrect. For one thing, you're open to other solutions than eliminating clearpage from include so 'don't do this' may apply to Alan Munn's answer, but it needn't apply to all answers to this question.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:07











  • That is, if it is a duplicate, it's a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/1209065/3186474.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:09











  • But that question isn't on TeX SE so I don't know it can be marked as a duplicate here.

    – cfr
    Oct 3 at 18:11







2




2





You could use something like letmyinputinclude in the preamble and then change it to letmyinputinput for the final version. If you don't want to risk patching internal commands.

– cfr
Oct 2 at 3:44





You could use something like letmyinputinclude in the preamble and then change it to letmyinputinput for the final version. If you don't want to risk patching internal commands.

– cfr
Oct 2 at 3:44













I don't really get though why this question is a duplicate of the other question? I understand from the nice flashy graphic on the other question why the answer that was once here is not perhaps the best solution, but I am left with the question of how best to omit inputs in that case (the other question does not address this at all). @cfr, that is a reasonable solution, thanks!

– badroit
Oct 3 at 2:59





I don't really get though why this question is a duplicate of the other question? I understand from the nice flashy graphic on the other question why the answer that was once here is not perhaps the best solution, but I am left with the question of how best to omit inputs in that case (the other question does not address this at all). @cfr, that is a reasonable solution, thanks!

– badroit
Oct 3 at 2:59




1




1





I agree. This is certainly NOT a duplicate of the other question. If it is to be marked as a duplicate, it should be a duplicate of the question linked from the one it is marked as currently. I can only think David marked it as a duplicate on the grounds that the answer is the same, but even that strikes me as incorrect. For one thing, you're open to other solutions than eliminating clearpage from include so 'don't do this' may apply to Alan Munn's answer, but it needn't apply to all answers to this question.

– cfr
Oct 3 at 18:07





I agree. This is certainly NOT a duplicate of the other question. If it is to be marked as a duplicate, it should be a duplicate of the question linked from the one it is marked as currently. I can only think David marked it as a duplicate on the grounds that the answer is the same, but even that strikes me as incorrect. For one thing, you're open to other solutions than eliminating clearpage from include so 'don't do this' may apply to Alan Munn's answer, but it needn't apply to all answers to this question.

– cfr
Oct 3 at 18:07













That is, if it is a duplicate, it's a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/1209065/3186474.

– cfr
Oct 3 at 18:09





That is, if it is a duplicate, it's a duplicate of stackoverflow.com/q/1209065/3186474.

– cfr
Oct 3 at 18:09













But that question isn't on TeX SE so I don't know it can be marked as a duplicate here.

– cfr
Oct 3 at 18:11





But that question isn't on TeX SE so I don't know it can be marked as a duplicate here.

– cfr
Oct 3 at 18:11










0






active

oldest

votes













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510608%2fa-version-of-includeonly-for-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510608%2fa-version-of-includeonly-for-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?