How to refresh wired service getRecord manually?LWC Force Refresh Wire getRecordForce update lightning-record-view-formWhen do @wire methods run (LWC)?LWC : passing parameter to getrecordLWC Force Refresh Wire getRecordHow to use wired function?How to avoid error Cannot read property of undefined using two LWC Wired propertiesLWC: wire and getRecord, get field valuesgetRecord in connectCallbackHow to get an LWC component on a record page to refresh when that page is updatedLWC renderedCallback not retrieving a wired recordimperative apex method not called from wire

Cherem ceremony: candles?

Am I overreacting or seeing things where they don't exist?

Did the computer mouse always output relative x/y and not absolute?

What are examples of (collections of) papers which "close" a field?

Possible bug in NMaximize function?

SQL Server: Multiple Availability Groups, one cluster, how do I keep the primary cluster node as primary?

How to protect assets from being passed to a beneficiary in a will when they are likely to die soon also

Is it possible for a moon to have a higher surface gravity than the planet it is attached to?

Can a VASIMR Plasma engine be used for vertical takeoff?

Controlling a robot blindfolded on a 9x9 grid

How much do I need to invest monthly to accumulate a given amount?

What would happen if the Queen died immediately before a general election?

Mirrors on both bars

Is Absorb Elements cast before or after a save? Is it cast before or after damage?

Can we violate law of physics in any other planet?

Schemes/ Mechanisms that could provide one time decryption?

What made the Tusken Raiders unable / unwilling to shoot down Luke's Landspeeder?

Why aren't there attempts to evolve classical musical instruments so that they're easier to play?

Generate array of integers that sum to zero

How do I use an .img.xz file or get an .img file from it?

What is the meaning of "wiped my face with a planet"?

Do attacks that give the Grappled condition work against creatures more than 1 size larger?

"Don't invest now because the market is high"

Temporary queue to prevent duplication



How to refresh wired service getRecord manually?


LWC Force Refresh Wire getRecordForce update lightning-record-view-formWhen do @wire methods run (LWC)?LWC : passing parameter to getrecordLWC Force Refresh Wire getRecordHow to use wired function?How to avoid error Cannot read property of undefined using two LWC Wired propertiesLWC: wire and getRecord, get field valuesgetRecord in connectCallbackHow to get an LWC component on a record page to refresh when that page is updatedLWC renderedCallback not retrieving a wired recordimperative apex method not called from wire






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









4


















Please note that this is not duplicate of LWC Force Refresh Wire getRecord - this question and answer specifically speaks about changes in front-end/UI and capturing that in front-end BUT LDS cannot listen to database changes to record and so we need to manually refresh LDS record cache.



Question:



According to documentation of refreshApex, if we know that record has been updated in database, we can invoke refreshApex to re-invoke and refresh the cached response of Apex method response.



But for wired service getRecord, there is no such method to manually refresh the cache and it refreshes the cache only after 30 seconds from last fetching the record ( - if invoked within or after 30 seconds). If I know that the record has been updated in the database through some backend transaction (like workflow), how can we manually refresh cache of getRecord?










share|improve this question































    4


















    Please note that this is not duplicate of LWC Force Refresh Wire getRecord - this question and answer specifically speaks about changes in front-end/UI and capturing that in front-end BUT LDS cannot listen to database changes to record and so we need to manually refresh LDS record cache.



    Question:



    According to documentation of refreshApex, if we know that record has been updated in database, we can invoke refreshApex to re-invoke and refresh the cached response of Apex method response.



    But for wired service getRecord, there is no such method to manually refresh the cache and it refreshes the cache only after 30 seconds from last fetching the record ( - if invoked within or after 30 seconds). If I know that the record has been updated in the database through some backend transaction (like workflow), how can we manually refresh cache of getRecord?










    share|improve this question



























      4













      4









      4


      3






      Please note that this is not duplicate of LWC Force Refresh Wire getRecord - this question and answer specifically speaks about changes in front-end/UI and capturing that in front-end BUT LDS cannot listen to database changes to record and so we need to manually refresh LDS record cache.



      Question:



      According to documentation of refreshApex, if we know that record has been updated in database, we can invoke refreshApex to re-invoke and refresh the cached response of Apex method response.



      But for wired service getRecord, there is no such method to manually refresh the cache and it refreshes the cache only after 30 seconds from last fetching the record ( - if invoked within or after 30 seconds). If I know that the record has been updated in the database through some backend transaction (like workflow), how can we manually refresh cache of getRecord?










      share|improve this question














      Please note that this is not duplicate of LWC Force Refresh Wire getRecord - this question and answer specifically speaks about changes in front-end/UI and capturing that in front-end BUT LDS cannot listen to database changes to record and so we need to manually refresh LDS record cache.



      Question:



      According to documentation of refreshApex, if we know that record has been updated in database, we can invoke refreshApex to re-invoke and refresh the cached response of Apex method response.



      But for wired service getRecord, there is no such method to manually refresh the cache and it refreshes the cache only after 30 seconds from last fetching the record ( - if invoked within or after 30 seconds). If I know that the record has been updated in the database through some backend transaction (like workflow), how can we manually refresh cache of getRecord?







      lightning lightning-web-components lwc-wire-adapter






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Sep 26 at 8:34









      salesforce-sassalesforce-sas

      14.3k2 gold badges5 silver badges30 bronze badges




      14.3k2 gold badges5 silver badges30 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9



















          To make refreshApex clear the client-side cache it is necessary to capture and store the entire result from the getRecord wire. In this case you cannot define your handler to accept an anonymous object with data and error properties.



          You need to do something like the following. First add a private property to hold the result:



          _getRecordResponse;


          Then update the handling of the getRecord wire response from something like:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(error, data)
          ...



          to:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(response)
          this._getRecordResponse = response;
          let error = response && response.error;
          let data = response && response.data;
          ...



          Now that you have the _getRecordResponse, you can force the record to be reloaded by calling:



          refreshApex(this._getRecordResponse);





          share|improve this answer

























          • Worth also noting you might be able to listen for changes in the backend using the Emp service - basically using streaming API and a change event.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 9:27











          • Thanks Phil!, when I tried this implementation before, I was not getting log and so thought its not refreshing. I answered for that part below

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:04



















          3



















          Extending answer from @Phil W,



          For below Sample LWC Js:



          @api recordId = '00128000009j45tAAA';
          @track wiredAccount;

          fields = [ACCOUNT_NAME_FIELD, ACCOUNT_DESCRIPTION_FIELD];

          @wire(getRecord, recordId: '$recordId', fields: '$fields' )
          fetchAcc(response)
          console.log('Account => ', JSON.stringify(response));
          this.wiredAccount = response;


          refreshWire()
          refreshApex(this.wiredAccount);



          Although we invoke refreshWire, the wired method fetchAcc will be invoked ONLY if new record and UI record in this.wiredAccount are not same and consecutively see the console log. If the new record is same as UI record this.wiredAccount, the method fetchAcc will not be invoked (even after 30 seconds) and we will not see any console log. Finally, refreshApex should have been named refreshWire as it not just updates apex method response but also wired service response.






          share|improve this answer

























          • refreshApex is, I would presume, called refreshApex because both imperative and wired calls are fundamentally both just calling a (cacheable) AuraEnabled Apex method. The difference with a wired service is that there is client-side logic for handling caching (and for detecting changes to wired "reactive" parameters for re-invocation).

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:25












          • @PhilW So, you mean getRecord is internally apex method in lightning namespace ?

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:31











          • Yeah, I would think so. It seems like Salesforce is generally pretty good at using its own plumbing to implement stuff. Obviously I can't guarantee this since I've not seen the code, but it makes sense to do it this way.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:49











          • crap.. this is good.. I was doing eval('$A.force.refreshView`)

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Sep 26 at 15:52












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "459"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );














          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f279516%2fhow-to-refresh-wired-service-getrecord-manually%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown


























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9



















          To make refreshApex clear the client-side cache it is necessary to capture and store the entire result from the getRecord wire. In this case you cannot define your handler to accept an anonymous object with data and error properties.



          You need to do something like the following. First add a private property to hold the result:



          _getRecordResponse;


          Then update the handling of the getRecord wire response from something like:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(error, data)
          ...



          to:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(response)
          this._getRecordResponse = response;
          let error = response && response.error;
          let data = response && response.data;
          ...



          Now that you have the _getRecordResponse, you can force the record to be reloaded by calling:



          refreshApex(this._getRecordResponse);





          share|improve this answer

























          • Worth also noting you might be able to listen for changes in the backend using the Emp service - basically using streaming API and a change event.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 9:27











          • Thanks Phil!, when I tried this implementation before, I was not getting log and so thought its not refreshing. I answered for that part below

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:04
















          9



















          To make refreshApex clear the client-side cache it is necessary to capture and store the entire result from the getRecord wire. In this case you cannot define your handler to accept an anonymous object with data and error properties.



          You need to do something like the following. First add a private property to hold the result:



          _getRecordResponse;


          Then update the handling of the getRecord wire response from something like:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(error, data)
          ...



          to:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(response)
          this._getRecordResponse = response;
          let error = response && response.error;
          let data = response && response.data;
          ...



          Now that you have the _getRecordResponse, you can force the record to be reloaded by calling:



          refreshApex(this._getRecordResponse);





          share|improve this answer

























          • Worth also noting you might be able to listen for changes in the backend using the Emp service - basically using streaming API and a change event.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 9:27











          • Thanks Phil!, when I tried this implementation before, I was not getting log and so thought its not refreshing. I answered for that part below

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:04














          9















          9











          9









          To make refreshApex clear the client-side cache it is necessary to capture and store the entire result from the getRecord wire. In this case you cannot define your handler to accept an anonymous object with data and error properties.



          You need to do something like the following. First add a private property to hold the result:



          _getRecordResponse;


          Then update the handling of the getRecord wire response from something like:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(error, data)
          ...



          to:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(response)
          this._getRecordResponse = response;
          let error = response && response.error;
          let data = response && response.data;
          ...



          Now that you have the _getRecordResponse, you can force the record to be reloaded by calling:



          refreshApex(this._getRecordResponse);





          share|improve this answer














          To make refreshApex clear the client-side cache it is necessary to capture and store the entire result from the getRecord wire. In this case you cannot define your handler to accept an anonymous object with data and error properties.



          You need to do something like the following. First add a private property to hold the result:



          _getRecordResponse;


          Then update the handling of the getRecord wire response from something like:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(error, data)
          ...



          to:



          @wire(getRecord, ...)
          receiveRecord(response)
          this._getRecordResponse = response;
          let error = response && response.error;
          let data = response && response.data;
          ...



          Now that you have the _getRecordResponse, you can force the record to be reloaded by calling:



          refreshApex(this._getRecordResponse);






          share|improve this answer













          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer










          answered Sep 26 at 9:20









          Phil WPhil W

          5,4971 gold badge6 silver badges15 bronze badges




          5,4971 gold badge6 silver badges15 bronze badges















          • Worth also noting you might be able to listen for changes in the backend using the Emp service - basically using streaming API and a change event.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 9:27











          • Thanks Phil!, when I tried this implementation before, I was not getting log and so thought its not refreshing. I answered for that part below

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:04


















          • Worth also noting you might be able to listen for changes in the backend using the Emp service - basically using streaming API and a change event.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 9:27











          • Thanks Phil!, when I tried this implementation before, I was not getting log and so thought its not refreshing. I answered for that part below

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:04

















          Worth also noting you might be able to listen for changes in the backend using the Emp service - basically using streaming API and a change event.

          – Phil W
          Sep 26 at 9:27





          Worth also noting you might be able to listen for changes in the backend using the Emp service - basically using streaming API and a change event.

          – Phil W
          Sep 26 at 9:27













          Thanks Phil!, when I tried this implementation before, I was not getting log and so thought its not refreshing. I answered for that part below

          – salesforce-sas
          Sep 26 at 10:04






          Thanks Phil!, when I tried this implementation before, I was not getting log and so thought its not refreshing. I answered for that part below

          – salesforce-sas
          Sep 26 at 10:04














          3



















          Extending answer from @Phil W,



          For below Sample LWC Js:



          @api recordId = '00128000009j45tAAA';
          @track wiredAccount;

          fields = [ACCOUNT_NAME_FIELD, ACCOUNT_DESCRIPTION_FIELD];

          @wire(getRecord, recordId: '$recordId', fields: '$fields' )
          fetchAcc(response)
          console.log('Account => ', JSON.stringify(response));
          this.wiredAccount = response;


          refreshWire()
          refreshApex(this.wiredAccount);



          Although we invoke refreshWire, the wired method fetchAcc will be invoked ONLY if new record and UI record in this.wiredAccount are not same and consecutively see the console log. If the new record is same as UI record this.wiredAccount, the method fetchAcc will not be invoked (even after 30 seconds) and we will not see any console log. Finally, refreshApex should have been named refreshWire as it not just updates apex method response but also wired service response.






          share|improve this answer

























          • refreshApex is, I would presume, called refreshApex because both imperative and wired calls are fundamentally both just calling a (cacheable) AuraEnabled Apex method. The difference with a wired service is that there is client-side logic for handling caching (and for detecting changes to wired "reactive" parameters for re-invocation).

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:25












          • @PhilW So, you mean getRecord is internally apex method in lightning namespace ?

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:31











          • Yeah, I would think so. It seems like Salesforce is generally pretty good at using its own plumbing to implement stuff. Obviously I can't guarantee this since I've not seen the code, but it makes sense to do it this way.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:49











          • crap.. this is good.. I was doing eval('$A.force.refreshView`)

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Sep 26 at 15:52















          3



















          Extending answer from @Phil W,



          For below Sample LWC Js:



          @api recordId = '00128000009j45tAAA';
          @track wiredAccount;

          fields = [ACCOUNT_NAME_FIELD, ACCOUNT_DESCRIPTION_FIELD];

          @wire(getRecord, recordId: '$recordId', fields: '$fields' )
          fetchAcc(response)
          console.log('Account => ', JSON.stringify(response));
          this.wiredAccount = response;


          refreshWire()
          refreshApex(this.wiredAccount);



          Although we invoke refreshWire, the wired method fetchAcc will be invoked ONLY if new record and UI record in this.wiredAccount are not same and consecutively see the console log. If the new record is same as UI record this.wiredAccount, the method fetchAcc will not be invoked (even after 30 seconds) and we will not see any console log. Finally, refreshApex should have been named refreshWire as it not just updates apex method response but also wired service response.






          share|improve this answer

























          • refreshApex is, I would presume, called refreshApex because both imperative and wired calls are fundamentally both just calling a (cacheable) AuraEnabled Apex method. The difference with a wired service is that there is client-side logic for handling caching (and for detecting changes to wired "reactive" parameters for re-invocation).

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:25












          • @PhilW So, you mean getRecord is internally apex method in lightning namespace ?

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:31











          • Yeah, I would think so. It seems like Salesforce is generally pretty good at using its own plumbing to implement stuff. Obviously I can't guarantee this since I've not seen the code, but it makes sense to do it this way.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:49











          • crap.. this is good.. I was doing eval('$A.force.refreshView`)

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Sep 26 at 15:52













          3















          3











          3









          Extending answer from @Phil W,



          For below Sample LWC Js:



          @api recordId = '00128000009j45tAAA';
          @track wiredAccount;

          fields = [ACCOUNT_NAME_FIELD, ACCOUNT_DESCRIPTION_FIELD];

          @wire(getRecord, recordId: '$recordId', fields: '$fields' )
          fetchAcc(response)
          console.log('Account => ', JSON.stringify(response));
          this.wiredAccount = response;


          refreshWire()
          refreshApex(this.wiredAccount);



          Although we invoke refreshWire, the wired method fetchAcc will be invoked ONLY if new record and UI record in this.wiredAccount are not same and consecutively see the console log. If the new record is same as UI record this.wiredAccount, the method fetchAcc will not be invoked (even after 30 seconds) and we will not see any console log. Finally, refreshApex should have been named refreshWire as it not just updates apex method response but also wired service response.






          share|improve this answer














          Extending answer from @Phil W,



          For below Sample LWC Js:



          @api recordId = '00128000009j45tAAA';
          @track wiredAccount;

          fields = [ACCOUNT_NAME_FIELD, ACCOUNT_DESCRIPTION_FIELD];

          @wire(getRecord, recordId: '$recordId', fields: '$fields' )
          fetchAcc(response)
          console.log('Account => ', JSON.stringify(response));
          this.wiredAccount = response;


          refreshWire()
          refreshApex(this.wiredAccount);



          Although we invoke refreshWire, the wired method fetchAcc will be invoked ONLY if new record and UI record in this.wiredAccount are not same and consecutively see the console log. If the new record is same as UI record this.wiredAccount, the method fetchAcc will not be invoked (even after 30 seconds) and we will not see any console log. Finally, refreshApex should have been named refreshWire as it not just updates apex method response but also wired service response.







          share|improve this answer













          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer










          answered Sep 26 at 10:03









          salesforce-sassalesforce-sas

          14.3k2 gold badges5 silver badges30 bronze badges




          14.3k2 gold badges5 silver badges30 bronze badges















          • refreshApex is, I would presume, called refreshApex because both imperative and wired calls are fundamentally both just calling a (cacheable) AuraEnabled Apex method. The difference with a wired service is that there is client-side logic for handling caching (and for detecting changes to wired "reactive" parameters for re-invocation).

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:25












          • @PhilW So, you mean getRecord is internally apex method in lightning namespace ?

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:31











          • Yeah, I would think so. It seems like Salesforce is generally pretty good at using its own plumbing to implement stuff. Obviously I can't guarantee this since I've not seen the code, but it makes sense to do it this way.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:49











          • crap.. this is good.. I was doing eval('$A.force.refreshView`)

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Sep 26 at 15:52

















          • refreshApex is, I would presume, called refreshApex because both imperative and wired calls are fundamentally both just calling a (cacheable) AuraEnabled Apex method. The difference with a wired service is that there is client-side logic for handling caching (and for detecting changes to wired "reactive" parameters for re-invocation).

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:25












          • @PhilW So, you mean getRecord is internally apex method in lightning namespace ?

            – salesforce-sas
            Sep 26 at 10:31











          • Yeah, I would think so. It seems like Salesforce is generally pretty good at using its own plumbing to implement stuff. Obviously I can't guarantee this since I've not seen the code, but it makes sense to do it this way.

            – Phil W
            Sep 26 at 10:49











          • crap.. this is good.. I was doing eval('$A.force.refreshView`)

            – Pranay Jaiswal
            Sep 26 at 15:52
















          refreshApex is, I would presume, called refreshApex because both imperative and wired calls are fundamentally both just calling a (cacheable) AuraEnabled Apex method. The difference with a wired service is that there is client-side logic for handling caching (and for detecting changes to wired "reactive" parameters for re-invocation).

          – Phil W
          Sep 26 at 10:25






          refreshApex is, I would presume, called refreshApex because both imperative and wired calls are fundamentally both just calling a (cacheable) AuraEnabled Apex method. The difference with a wired service is that there is client-side logic for handling caching (and for detecting changes to wired "reactive" parameters for re-invocation).

          – Phil W
          Sep 26 at 10:25














          @PhilW So, you mean getRecord is internally apex method in lightning namespace ?

          – salesforce-sas
          Sep 26 at 10:31





          @PhilW So, you mean getRecord is internally apex method in lightning namespace ?

          – salesforce-sas
          Sep 26 at 10:31













          Yeah, I would think so. It seems like Salesforce is generally pretty good at using its own plumbing to implement stuff. Obviously I can't guarantee this since I've not seen the code, but it makes sense to do it this way.

          – Phil W
          Sep 26 at 10:49





          Yeah, I would think so. It seems like Salesforce is generally pretty good at using its own plumbing to implement stuff. Obviously I can't guarantee this since I've not seen the code, but it makes sense to do it this way.

          – Phil W
          Sep 26 at 10:49













          crap.. this is good.. I was doing eval('$A.force.refreshView`)

          – Pranay Jaiswal
          Sep 26 at 15:52





          crap.. this is good.. I was doing eval('$A.force.refreshView`)

          – Pranay Jaiswal
          Sep 26 at 15:52


















          draft saved

          draft discarded















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f279516%2fhow-to-refresh-wired-service-getrecord-manually%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown









          Popular posts from this blog

          Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

          Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

          Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?