Is it appropriate to send out a manuscript under review to a professor?What are the strategies for getting feedback on articles?How to offer a reviewer to be co-author?I found a nontrivial mistake in my currently-under-review paper. Should I send a correction to the editor?What does the “re-review” mean?Is it common to be given 6 months for a minor revision outcome?When writing referee's report after paper revision, can I discuss the reports of other referees?Should I send a mail to query the process of my manuscript since it is in the “Awaiting EIC Decision” status for two weeks?Which review recommendation should I give to maximize the likelihood that a manuscript is rejected?Who to contact when handling editor is anonymous and manuscript is delayed?What to do for a paper with a very long review process?
I’m 18 years old and want to finance a £30,000 car
Why do aircraft cockpit displays use uppercase fonts?
Arrange 5 non-attacking knights on a 5x5 toroidal board
Will the same Javascript fetched by HTTP and HTTPS be cached separately by the browser?
Why are Marx Generators built like that?
What would you call this scale?
Is it possible for a tiger's tail to be taken off and replaced with a living cobra, with both creatures still alive?
How does a religion based around destroying the world attract followers
An Ailing Assassin
How effective and viable would bronze full plate be?
Isn't 1 congruent to -1?
What happens when exhaustion passes 6th level on an immune creature?
Is it possible for nature to create bubble wrap?
Is it principled to tip less if a pricey restaurant doesn't accept Visa or Mastercard?
A trivial proof of Bertrand's postulate
I've never seen this before. Is this primarily a "rote computational trick" for multiplication by 9 ...?
Definition of "worst point one percent"?
Declining a paper review after accepting it and seeing the manuscript
Sleep for 1000 years
Portisch-Radulov, Moscow 1977. Doesn't 16.c5 lose a pawn?
Why are bicycle tires incapable of maintaining pressure over time, while car tyres seem to have less of a problem?
Can you marry a girl in Stardew Valley if you are a girl?
Story ID: plugging vacuum leak with one's butt
What is the melting temperature of a 3D printed part?
Is it appropriate to send out a manuscript under review to a professor?
What are the strategies for getting feedback on articles?How to offer a reviewer to be co-author?I found a nontrivial mistake in my currently-under-review paper. Should I send a correction to the editor?What does the “re-review” mean?Is it common to be given 6 months for a minor revision outcome?When writing referee's report after paper revision, can I discuss the reports of other referees?Should I send a mail to query the process of my manuscript since it is in the “Awaiting EIC Decision” status for two weeks?Which review recommendation should I give to maximize the likelihood that a manuscript is rejected?Who to contact when handling editor is anonymous and manuscript is delayed?What to do for a paper with a very long review process?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
add a comment
|
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
2
It's not only appropriate, but something you should do with all your papers, in my opinion (with the agreement of your coauthors, of course).
– David Ketcheson
Oct 1 at 7:10
add a comment
|
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
peer-review paper-submission
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
edited Sep 30 at 19:13
Azor Ahai
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
6,7952 gold badges23 silver badges48 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
asked Sep 30 at 16:05
WH1810WH1810
814 bronze badges
814 bronze badges
2
It's not only appropriate, but something you should do with all your papers, in my opinion (with the agreement of your coauthors, of course).
– David Ketcheson
Oct 1 at 7:10
add a comment
|
2
It's not only appropriate, but something you should do with all your papers, in my opinion (with the agreement of your coauthors, of course).
– David Ketcheson
Oct 1 at 7:10
2
2
It's not only appropriate, but something you should do with all your papers, in my opinion (with the agreement of your coauthors, of course).
– David Ketcheson
Oct 1 at 7:10
It's not only appropriate, but something you should do with all your papers, in my opinion (with the agreement of your coauthors, of course).
– David Ketcheson
Oct 1 at 7:10
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
2
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
Sep 30 at 19:40
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
Sep 30 at 19:59
1
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock reinstate Monica
Sep 30 at 20:37
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Yes, of course should you share your manuscript with all trusted and interested parties. In order to avoid the danger that your ideas are stolen, you may consider to publish the manuscript online. In several areas, some authors publish their submitted manuscripts online on, say, the arXiv (for math and physics), which most journals are happy with since it increases the citations and hence their impact.
This has the advantage that the your authorship of the ideas in the manuscript is clearly claimed: nobody can steal them and claim originality (not even the reviewers and editors – and since you're asking, yes that does happen) and sharing the manuscript is not necessary. The disadvantage is perhaps that you cannot completely withdraw a faulty version published in this way (there are several arXiv papers that failed to ever get accepted for publication with a journal).
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137848%2fis-it-appropriate-to-send-out-a-manuscript-under-review-to-a-professor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
2
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
Sep 30 at 19:40
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
Sep 30 at 19:59
1
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock reinstate Monica
Sep 30 at 20:37
add a comment
|
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
2
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
Sep 30 at 19:40
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
Sep 30 at 19:59
1
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock reinstate Monica
Sep 30 at 20:37
add a comment
|
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
answered Sep 30 at 16:33
BuffyBuffy
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
100k25 gold badges310 silver badges436 bronze badges
2
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
Sep 30 at 19:40
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
Sep 30 at 19:59
1
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock reinstate Monica
Sep 30 at 20:37
add a comment
|
2
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
Sep 30 at 19:40
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
Sep 30 at 19:59
1
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock reinstate Monica
Sep 30 at 20:37
2
2
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
Sep 30 at 19:40
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
Sep 30 at 19:40
1
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
Sep 30 at 19:59
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
Sep 30 at 19:59
1
1
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock reinstate Monica
Sep 30 at 20:37
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock reinstate Monica
Sep 30 at 20:37
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
answered Sep 30 at 22:45
PoidahPoidah
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
3,0068 silver badges24 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Yes, of course should you share your manuscript with all trusted and interested parties. In order to avoid the danger that your ideas are stolen, you may consider to publish the manuscript online. In several areas, some authors publish their submitted manuscripts online on, say, the arXiv (for math and physics), which most journals are happy with since it increases the citations and hence their impact.
This has the advantage that the your authorship of the ideas in the manuscript is clearly claimed: nobody can steal them and claim originality (not even the reviewers and editors – and since you're asking, yes that does happen) and sharing the manuscript is not necessary. The disadvantage is perhaps that you cannot completely withdraw a faulty version published in this way (there are several arXiv papers that failed to ever get accepted for publication with a journal).
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Yes, of course should you share your manuscript with all trusted and interested parties. In order to avoid the danger that your ideas are stolen, you may consider to publish the manuscript online. In several areas, some authors publish their submitted manuscripts online on, say, the arXiv (for math and physics), which most journals are happy with since it increases the citations and hence their impact.
This has the advantage that the your authorship of the ideas in the manuscript is clearly claimed: nobody can steal them and claim originality (not even the reviewers and editors – and since you're asking, yes that does happen) and sharing the manuscript is not necessary. The disadvantage is perhaps that you cannot completely withdraw a faulty version published in this way (there are several arXiv papers that failed to ever get accepted for publication with a journal).
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Yes, of course should you share your manuscript with all trusted and interested parties. In order to avoid the danger that your ideas are stolen, you may consider to publish the manuscript online. In several areas, some authors publish their submitted manuscripts online on, say, the arXiv (for math and physics), which most journals are happy with since it increases the citations and hence their impact.
This has the advantage that the your authorship of the ideas in the manuscript is clearly claimed: nobody can steal them and claim originality (not even the reviewers and editors – and since you're asking, yes that does happen) and sharing the manuscript is not necessary. The disadvantage is perhaps that you cannot completely withdraw a faulty version published in this way (there are several arXiv papers that failed to ever get accepted for publication with a journal).
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
Yes, of course should you share your manuscript with all trusted and interested parties. In order to avoid the danger that your ideas are stolen, you may consider to publish the manuscript online. In several areas, some authors publish their submitted manuscripts online on, say, the arXiv (for math and physics), which most journals are happy with since it increases the citations and hence their impact.
This has the advantage that the your authorship of the ideas in the manuscript is clearly claimed: nobody can steal them and claim originality (not even the reviewers and editors – and since you're asking, yes that does happen) and sharing the manuscript is not necessary. The disadvantage is perhaps that you cannot completely withdraw a faulty version published in this way (there are several arXiv papers that failed to ever get accepted for publication with a journal).
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
answered Oct 1 at 6:26
WalterWalter
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
5,0381 gold badge15 silver badges28 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137848%2fis-it-appropriate-to-send-out-a-manuscript-under-review-to-a-professor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It's not only appropriate, but something you should do with all your papers, in my opinion (with the agreement of your coauthors, of course).
– David Ketcheson
Oct 1 at 7:10