Are objects structures and/or vice versa? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre cave walls considered objects for the purpose of spells - and how much of one?How can I keep Darkness on a monsterCan a Shadow Dragon become a Dracolich or vice versa?Can radiant damage destroy objects?Do Devils leverage demons and vice versa?Can you attack from inside Rope Trick and vice versa?Are you considered to be wearing/carrying a restraining net/rope/etc. for the purpose of fire based spells?Can Catapult be used on Delayed Blast Fireball?Can you leave objects behind in the ethereal plane?How does Shatter damage objects, if objects are immune to con-save effects?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?
When should I buy a clipper card after flying to OAK?
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Can a flute soloist sit?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?
FPGA - DIY Programming
Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?
If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?
What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?
Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Aging parents with no investments
Return to UK after having been refused entry years ago
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre cave walls considered objects for the purpose of spells - and how much of one?How can I keep Darkness on a monsterCan a Shadow Dragon become a Dracolich or vice versa?Can radiant damage destroy objects?Do Devils leverage demons and vice versa?Can you attack from inside Rope Trick and vice versa?Are you considered to be wearing/carrying a restraining net/rope/etc. for the purpose of fire based spells?Can Catapult be used on Delayed Blast Fireball?Can you leave objects behind in the ethereal plane?How does Shatter damage objects, if objects are immune to con-save effects?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
$endgroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
dnd-5e objects
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
26.4k591161
26.4k591161
asked 2 days ago
RykaraRykara
5,5081544
5,5081544
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144804%2fare-objects-structures-and-or-vice-versa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
edited 2 days ago
PixelMaster
13.2k350121
13.2k350121
answered 2 days ago
Mwr247Mwr247
2,9891726
2,9891726
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago
3
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
2 days ago
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144804%2fare-objects-structures-and-or-vice-versa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
2 days ago