Bsrgvty

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?

Feature engineering suggestion required

Falsification in Math vs Science

What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Right tool to dig six foot holes?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

When should I buy a clipper card after flying to OAK?

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

The difference between dialogue marks

How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?

Why was the “bread communication” in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

12

1

In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.

Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.

This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?

adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire

share|improve this question

edited 2 days ago

Thunderforge

31.4k23149310

asked 2 days ago

PanchoaPanchoa

7319

New contributor

Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  9
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
  
  – witchy
  2 days ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

12

1

In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.

Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.

This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?

adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire

share|improve this question

edited 2 days ago

Thunderforge

31.4k23149310

asked 2 days ago

PanchoaPanchoa

7319

New contributor

Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  9
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?
  
  – witchy
  2 days ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.

Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.

This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?

adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire

share|improve this question

edited 2 days ago

Thunderforge

31.4k23149310

asked 2 days ago

PanchoaPanchoa

7319

New contributor

Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 2 days ago

Thunderforge

31.4k23149310

asked 2 days ago

PanchoaPanchoa

7319

New contributor

Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 2 days ago

Thunderforge

31.4k23149310

asked 2 days ago

PanchoaPanchoa

7319

New contributor

Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 2 days ago

Thunderforge

31.4k23149310

edited 2 days ago

Thunderforge

31.4k23149310

asked 2 days ago

PanchoaPanchoa

7319

New contributor

Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 2 days ago

PanchoaPanchoa

7319

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

20

Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques

Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.

Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.

The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.

Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.

share|improve this answer

edited 2 days ago

answered 2 days ago

Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,468824

• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
  
  – Thunderforge
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
  
  – Darrel Hoffman
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
  
  – Panchoa
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
  
  – Upper_Case
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Upper_Case But they have a 130M budget!!! IMO they should've done it.
  
  – Artemis Fowl
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 7 more comments

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208706%2fwhy-was-the-bread-communication-in-the-arena-of-catching-fire-left-out-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

20

Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques

Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.

Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.

The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.

Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.

share|improve this answer

edited 2 days ago

answered 2 days ago

Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,468824

• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
  
  – Thunderforge
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
  
  – Darrel Hoffman
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
  
  – Panchoa
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
  
  – Upper_Case
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Upper_Case But they have a 130M budget!!! IMO they should've done it.
  
  – Artemis Fowl
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 7 more comments

20

Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques

Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.

Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.

The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.

Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.

share|improve this answer

edited 2 days ago

answered 2 days ago

Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,468824

• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.
  
  – Thunderforge
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.
  
  – Darrel Hoffman
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.
  
  – Panchoa
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.
  
  – Upper_Case
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Upper_Case But they have a 130M budget!!! IMO they should've done it.
  
  – Artemis Fowl
  2 days ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 7 more comments

Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques

Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.

Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.

The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.

Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.

share|improve this answer

edited 2 days ago

answered 2 days ago

Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,468824

share|improve this answer

edited 2 days ago

answered 2 days ago

Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,468824

answered 2 days ago

Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,468824

answered 2 days ago

Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,468824