Correctly defining the return of a procedure The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhy should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?Defining a string based sort functionDefining functions in a loopReturn value of Reap when using tagsHow to define even permutations correctly?How to exclude some indices in defining Table?How to make a repetive procedure with LinearModelFitTable with List iterator return unpacked listreverse procedure of KroneckerProductDefine the substitution procedure as a functionRebuild a vector defining the sign of the elements
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
How to manage monthly salary
Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?
What did it mean to "align" a radio?
If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?
Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?
Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?
What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
When should I buy a clipper card after flying to OAK?
Write faster on AT24C32
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?
Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
Correctly defining the return of a procedure
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhy should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?Defining a string based sort functionDefining functions in a loopReturn value of Reap when using tagsHow to define even permutations correctly?How to exclude some indices in defining Table?How to make a repetive procedure with LinearModelFitTable with List iterator return unpacked listreverse procedure of KroneckerProductDefine the substitution procedure as a functionRebuild a vector defining the sign of the elements
$begingroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. UseModule
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.
$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You might also look intoNest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.
I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:
1- set $x_0 = 0.5$
2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.
This is what I came up with so far
x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,
x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)
];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)
but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)
list-manipulation
list-manipulation
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
JacquesLeenJacquesLeen
303
303
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. UseModule
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.
$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You might also look intoNest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. UseModule
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.
$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You might also look intoNest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use
Module
, Block
, or With
for code blocks. And try not to use For
.$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use
Module
, Block
, or With
for code blocks. And try not to use For
.$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.$endgroup$
– John Doty
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.$endgroup$
– John Doty
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You might also look into
Nest
and NestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.$endgroup$
– Chris K
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You might also look into
Nest
and NestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.$endgroup$
– Chris K
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fcorrectly-defining-the-return-of-a-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
$endgroup$
Try this:
f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]
edited 2 days ago
MarcoB
38.6k557115
38.6k557115
answered 2 days ago
Innerw0lfInnerw0lf
814
814
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,
f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Or, a little more efficiently,
f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
$endgroup$
For a specific value of $r$ you can do
With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]
0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923
I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:
With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997
// Union
does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort
if you prefer.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
RomanRoman
4,95511130
4,95511130
add a comment |
add a comment |
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fcorrectly-defining-the-return-of-a-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use
Module
,Block
, orWith
for code blocks. And try not to useFor
.$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago
3
$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Return
doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.$endgroup$
– John Doty
2 days ago
$begingroup$
You might also look into
Nest
andNestList
as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.$endgroup$
– Chris K
2 days ago