Why can't we feel the Earth's revolution?Earth's gravitational pull on ISSWhy don't we feel the speed of earth movingWhy can't gravity repel things?Why can't we see the supermassive black holes supposedly at the center of galaxies?Why don’t we feel the Earth rotating beneath us?Why can't supermassive black holes merge? (or can they?)

If I am just replacing the car engine, do I need to replace the odometer as well?

What does "2 fingers to Scotland" mean in Peter Grant's statement about Johnson not listening to the SNP's Westminster leader speeches?

I was mistakenly identified as a criminal, and this has caused rumors. How can I convince my friends that it is all a mistake?

Creating cryptographic algorithms at runtime

An infinite version of the Dilworth theorem

Can Alter Self be used to enter an enemy's body and destroy it from the inside?

Storage account access for 3rd party Azure

How does Deep Packet Inspection work with encrypted packets?

Would the US government of the 1960’s be able to feasibly recreate a modern laptop?

Is SSH key with passphrase a 2FA

Is putting money in a 401(k) plan risky?

Is it worth delving deep outside my field to revise a paper?

Do any Star Trek characters play rock band instruments?

Locked out of my own server

how can I enforce the prohibition on love potions?

Does the on'yomi of 輪 (リン) have any relation to the English "ring", or is it a coincidence?

Why the real and imaginary parts of a complex analytic function are not independent?

Does cashing a 3% share harm the company itself?

There are polygons with only right angles which have an odd number of corners

Luggage storage in Garmisch-Partenkirchen

Does the original Game Boy game "Tetris" have a battery memory inside the cartridge?

How should I conceal gaps between laminate flooring and wall trim?

Why did Google not use an NP problem for their quantum supremacy experiment?

What is the topology on the set of field orders



Why can't we feel the Earth's revolution?


Earth's gravitational pull on ISSWhy don't we feel the speed of earth movingWhy can't gravity repel things?Why can't we see the supermassive black holes supposedly at the center of galaxies?Why don’t we feel the Earth rotating beneath us?Why can't supermassive black holes merge? (or can they?)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








22














$begingroup$


I googled it and checked a few Q&A and there's only things about "Earth's rotation". But why can't we feel the revolution?



They say we can't feel the rotation because the Earth spins at a constant speed. Okay, I get what happens for the rotation, but isn't it different when it comes to the revolution?



enter image description here



At night we feel the sum of speed of green and blue, whereas at day we should feel the sum of speed of green and minus blue, shouldn't we? In other words, shouldn't we feel the changes in velocity by times?










share|improve this question










$endgroup$










  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Speak for yourself. I feel quite dizzy, thank you very much. Also, the fact that we don't all float off into space (I can feel the floor below me as I type), appears to be evidence of something.
    $endgroup$
    – Strawberry
    Jun 13 at 8:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The explanation you read about Earth rotation is wrong but the answers should clarify that point as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Jun 14 at 12:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You also cannot feel the Moon or the Sun gravitational force, but the sea can, and you can measure the rise of the tides
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    Jun 14 at 13:26

















22














$begingroup$


I googled it and checked a few Q&A and there's only things about "Earth's rotation". But why can't we feel the revolution?



They say we can't feel the rotation because the Earth spins at a constant speed. Okay, I get what happens for the rotation, but isn't it different when it comes to the revolution?



enter image description here



At night we feel the sum of speed of green and blue, whereas at day we should feel the sum of speed of green and minus blue, shouldn't we? In other words, shouldn't we feel the changes in velocity by times?










share|improve this question










$endgroup$










  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Speak for yourself. I feel quite dizzy, thank you very much. Also, the fact that we don't all float off into space (I can feel the floor below me as I type), appears to be evidence of something.
    $endgroup$
    – Strawberry
    Jun 13 at 8:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The explanation you read about Earth rotation is wrong but the answers should clarify that point as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Jun 14 at 12:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You also cannot feel the Moon or the Sun gravitational force, but the sea can, and you can measure the rise of the tides
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    Jun 14 at 13:26













22












22








22


3



$begingroup$


I googled it and checked a few Q&A and there's only things about "Earth's rotation". But why can't we feel the revolution?



They say we can't feel the rotation because the Earth spins at a constant speed. Okay, I get what happens for the rotation, but isn't it different when it comes to the revolution?



enter image description here



At night we feel the sum of speed of green and blue, whereas at day we should feel the sum of speed of green and minus blue, shouldn't we? In other words, shouldn't we feel the changes in velocity by times?










share|improve this question










$endgroup$




I googled it and checked a few Q&A and there's only things about "Earth's rotation". But why can't we feel the revolution?



They say we can't feel the rotation because the Earth spins at a constant speed. Okay, I get what happens for the rotation, but isn't it different when it comes to the revolution?



enter image description here



At night we feel the sum of speed of green and blue, whereas at day we should feel the sum of speed of green and minus blue, shouldn't we? In other words, shouldn't we feel the changes in velocity by times?







gravity astrophysics






share|improve this question














share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 12 at 8:28









dolcodolco

2151 gold badge1 silver badge6 bronze badges




2151 gold badge1 silver badge6 bronze badges










  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Speak for yourself. I feel quite dizzy, thank you very much. Also, the fact that we don't all float off into space (I can feel the floor below me as I type), appears to be evidence of something.
    $endgroup$
    – Strawberry
    Jun 13 at 8:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The explanation you read about Earth rotation is wrong but the answers should clarify that point as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Jun 14 at 12:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You also cannot feel the Moon or the Sun gravitational force, but the sea can, and you can measure the rise of the tides
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    Jun 14 at 13:26












  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Speak for yourself. I feel quite dizzy, thank you very much. Also, the fact that we don't all float off into space (I can feel the floor below me as I type), appears to be evidence of something.
    $endgroup$
    – Strawberry
    Jun 13 at 8:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The explanation you read about Earth rotation is wrong but the answers should clarify that point as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Jun 14 at 12:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You also cannot feel the Moon or the Sun gravitational force, but the sea can, and you can measure the rise of the tides
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    Jun 14 at 13:26







7




7




$begingroup$
Speak for yourself. I feel quite dizzy, thank you very much. Also, the fact that we don't all float off into space (I can feel the floor below me as I type), appears to be evidence of something.
$endgroup$
– Strawberry
Jun 13 at 8:50




$begingroup$
Speak for yourself. I feel quite dizzy, thank you very much. Also, the fact that we don't all float off into space (I can feel the floor below me as I type), appears to be evidence of something.
$endgroup$
– Strawberry
Jun 13 at 8:50




2




2




$begingroup$
The explanation you read about Earth rotation is wrong but the answers should clarify that point as well.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Jun 14 at 12:31




$begingroup$
The explanation you read about Earth rotation is wrong but the answers should clarify that point as well.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
Jun 14 at 12:31




1




1




$begingroup$
You also cannot feel the Moon or the Sun gravitational force, but the sea can, and you can measure the rise of the tides
$endgroup$
– jean
Jun 14 at 13:26




$begingroup$
You also cannot feel the Moon or the Sun gravitational force, but the sea can, and you can measure the rise of the tides
$endgroup$
– jean
Jun 14 at 13:26










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















24
















$begingroup$

Firstly the speeds are massively different (about 1000 mph (1610 kph) on the equator for Earth's rotation and 70,000 mph (112,654 kph) for the revolution), so the change is not large. Secondly, the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity, which Einstein tells us cannot change the outcome of any experiment.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Which in turn is a reflection of just how weak gravity is.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Jun 12 at 19:49






  • 20




    $begingroup$
    This answer is misleading in that it is not the size of the speeds but any acceleration (change velocity in its speed or direction) that is related to an applied force. When traveling in a circle a force needs to be applied to change the direction of motion. The answers by llama and ap55 are better. However I like the "the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity". At constant velocity any forces are all balanced out (net force = zero, F=0)
    $endgroup$
    – TazAstroSpacial
    Jun 13 at 6:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Galileo, not Einstein.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    Jun 13 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yeah it didn't take Einstein to realize this...
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Jun 13 at 23:09


















58
















$begingroup$

You do, but it's too small to really notice



First, it's not correct to say that we don't feel Earth's rotation because it's rotating at a constant speed.



Think about driving a car, or riding in an airplane. Whether you're cruising down the road at 90 kph, or soaring through the air at 900 kph, you don't really "feel the speed".



However, When you take a sharp turn, or take off from the runway, you definitely feel something. That's the acceleration. It doesn't matter if your speedometer stays steady - if you take a sudden 90 degree turn, you're going to feel it.



More relaxed turns, such as going through a roundabout, or when the airplane circles the airport before landing, are much less likely to spill your drink.



Even if Earth is spinning at a constant speed, the spin is a change in direction, which requires acceleration.



Acceleration is quite noticeable, depending on its magnitude. Even just sitting down, you can feel the pull of Earth's 9.8 m/s² gravity - your body's "weight", as it were.



So how large is the acceleration keeping Earth in orbit? About 0.0059 m/s².
What about the acceleration of Earth's rotation? A ever so slightly larger 0.0339 m/s².



Small wonder that it seems like you can't feel these forces!






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A particle in orbit is in freefall, and it doesn't feel the centripetal force. But on an extended body there is the tidal force. So standing on the Earth's surface we don't feel the full force of the Sun's gravity, we just feel the difference between the strength of the Sun's gravity on the centre of the Earth vs its strength at our location. Similar remarks apply to the tidal force due to the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 8:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you're comparing the size of an ant (in mm) to the magnitude of acceleration (in mm/s²) but that doesn't make much sense – they are completely unrelated. The ant feels the same acceleration as every other object on Earth regardless of their size.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt "Small wonder" is a saying, it doesn't have anything to do with physical size. And the answer is still no, neither size or weight has anything to do with acceleration.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 16:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @PM2Ring Depends on what you mean by "feel". You are being pulled towards the sun by the gravity. However, if you try to measure this force by standing on a scale, the scale is also being pulled towards the sun. Since the acceleration is the same for both, the sun's gravity doesn't cause anything to be registered on the scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    Jun 13 at 17:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s The Earth is not a point. The point at the centre of the Earth is in freefall around the Sun. The rest of the Earth is subject to a tidal force from the Sun because it's not at the centre point.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 14 at 3:30


















12
















$begingroup$

The problem with how you're looking at it is that velocities don't cause or result from forces, but accelerations do. Think of Newton's 2nd law, $F = m a$. Circular motion is motion at constant speed but changing direction, this changing direction is a type of acceleration because velocity is a vector (has direction) and acceleration is change in velocity.



We do actually feel a difference due to this acceleration - if you think about a sphere rotating around an axis, the points on near the intersection of that axis with the surface are rotating slower than anywhere else, and so if you measure the local gravitational acceleration $g$ at the poles you get a slightly larger value than you do at the equator (about 0.3%). This is because the rotation acts in opposition to the force of gravity due to the earth's mass.



There is also a very small effect from the earth's orbit around the sun. In this case, the force due to acceleration is exactly the same as the force that holds the earth in orbit, so you can just look at the gravitational effects as done in this answer on physics.se, which came up with a value of around 26 parts per billion, or 0.0000026%. The interesting thing is that you become lighter both when the sun is overhead, and when it's directly on the opposite side of the earth to you.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    As John Rennie explains in the linked answer on Physics.SE, the force we feel from the Sun is the tidal force which arises because we're on the surface of the Earth, not at its centre.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 9:08


















9
















$begingroup$

I will give a biologically motivated answer to this question:



Feeling the Earth rotation carries no meaning to us. It is always approximately the same and we will blend out such background information and concentrate on news that are really important to us: Is there a danger approaching? Is the some food to gain? What are our peers doing?



Because there was no evolutionary pressure to feel the Earth rotation, we did not develop a sense for it. The fact that it is weak and really difficult to measure adds to this. We need an apparatus like Foucault's pendulum to see its effect.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It could be used for navigation, like gyrocompasses do. But human senses are not sensitive enough.
    $endgroup$
    – jpa
    Jun 13 at 18:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I know Foucault's pendula are capable of detecting (latitude adjusted) rotation. But revolution? Really? How does that compare with the wobble in period caused by ambient thermal cycling of the pendulum's length (or the room's dimensions, since one may make a pendulum out of Invar or its friends, but one does not spend the money to make such a room)?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Jun 14 at 3:30












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "514"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32262%2fwhy-cant-we-feel-the-earths-revolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









24
















$begingroup$

Firstly the speeds are massively different (about 1000 mph (1610 kph) on the equator for Earth's rotation and 70,000 mph (112,654 kph) for the revolution), so the change is not large. Secondly, the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity, which Einstein tells us cannot change the outcome of any experiment.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Which in turn is a reflection of just how weak gravity is.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Jun 12 at 19:49






  • 20




    $begingroup$
    This answer is misleading in that it is not the size of the speeds but any acceleration (change velocity in its speed or direction) that is related to an applied force. When traveling in a circle a force needs to be applied to change the direction of motion. The answers by llama and ap55 are better. However I like the "the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity". At constant velocity any forces are all balanced out (net force = zero, F=0)
    $endgroup$
    – TazAstroSpacial
    Jun 13 at 6:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Galileo, not Einstein.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    Jun 13 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yeah it didn't take Einstein to realize this...
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Jun 13 at 23:09















24
















$begingroup$

Firstly the speeds are massively different (about 1000 mph (1610 kph) on the equator for Earth's rotation and 70,000 mph (112,654 kph) for the revolution), so the change is not large. Secondly, the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity, which Einstein tells us cannot change the outcome of any experiment.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Which in turn is a reflection of just how weak gravity is.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Jun 12 at 19:49






  • 20




    $begingroup$
    This answer is misleading in that it is not the size of the speeds but any acceleration (change velocity in its speed or direction) that is related to an applied force. When traveling in a circle a force needs to be applied to change the direction of motion. The answers by llama and ap55 are better. However I like the "the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity". At constant velocity any forces are all balanced out (net force = zero, F=0)
    $endgroup$
    – TazAstroSpacial
    Jun 13 at 6:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Galileo, not Einstein.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    Jun 13 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yeah it didn't take Einstein to realize this...
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Jun 13 at 23:09













24














24










24







$begingroup$

Firstly the speeds are massively different (about 1000 mph (1610 kph) on the equator for Earth's rotation and 70,000 mph (112,654 kph) for the revolution), so the change is not large. Secondly, the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity, which Einstein tells us cannot change the outcome of any experiment.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$



Firstly the speeds are massively different (about 1000 mph (1610 kph) on the equator for Earth's rotation and 70,000 mph (112,654 kph) for the revolution), so the change is not large. Secondly, the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity, which Einstein tells us cannot change the outcome of any experiment.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited Jun 13 at 10:10









mcalex

1031 bronze badge




1031 bronze badge










answered Jun 12 at 10:13









Steve LintonSteve Linton

5,9241 gold badge9 silver badges32 bronze badges




5,9241 gold badge9 silver badges32 bronze badges










  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Which in turn is a reflection of just how weak gravity is.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Jun 12 at 19:49






  • 20




    $begingroup$
    This answer is misleading in that it is not the size of the speeds but any acceleration (change velocity in its speed or direction) that is related to an applied force. When traveling in a circle a force needs to be applied to change the direction of motion. The answers by llama and ap55 are better. However I like the "the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity". At constant velocity any forces are all balanced out (net force = zero, F=0)
    $endgroup$
    – TazAstroSpacial
    Jun 13 at 6:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Galileo, not Einstein.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    Jun 13 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yeah it didn't take Einstein to realize this...
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Jun 13 at 23:09












  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Which in turn is a reflection of just how weak gravity is.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Jun 12 at 19:49






  • 20




    $begingroup$
    This answer is misleading in that it is not the size of the speeds but any acceleration (change velocity in its speed or direction) that is related to an applied force. When traveling in a circle a force needs to be applied to change the direction of motion. The answers by llama and ap55 are better. However I like the "the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity". At constant velocity any forces are all balanced out (net force = zero, F=0)
    $endgroup$
    – TazAstroSpacial
    Jun 13 at 6:31






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Galileo, not Einstein.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    Jun 13 at 22:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yeah it didn't take Einstein to realize this...
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Jun 13 at 23:09







8




8




$begingroup$
Which in turn is a reflection of just how weak gravity is.
$endgroup$
– Pieter Geerkens
Jun 12 at 19:49




$begingroup$
Which in turn is a reflection of just how weak gravity is.
$endgroup$
– Pieter Geerkens
Jun 12 at 19:49




20




20




$begingroup$
This answer is misleading in that it is not the size of the speeds but any acceleration (change velocity in its speed or direction) that is related to an applied force. When traveling in a circle a force needs to be applied to change the direction of motion. The answers by llama and ap55 are better. However I like the "the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity". At constant velocity any forces are all balanced out (net force = zero, F=0)
$endgroup$
– TazAstroSpacial
Jun 13 at 6:31




$begingroup$
This answer is misleading in that it is not the size of the speeds but any acceleration (change velocity in its speed or direction) that is related to an applied force. When traveling in a circle a force needs to be applied to change the direction of motion. The answers by llama and ap55 are better. However I like the "the green line is far straighter than it appears in your picture (because the orbit is so large) so Earth's motion around the Sun is pretty close to motion at constant velocity". At constant velocity any forces are all balanced out (net force = zero, F=0)
$endgroup$
– TazAstroSpacial
Jun 13 at 6:31




6




6




$begingroup$
Galileo, not Einstein.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
Jun 13 at 22:56




$begingroup$
Galileo, not Einstein.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
Jun 13 at 22:56




1




1




$begingroup$
Yeah it didn't take Einstein to realize this...
$endgroup$
– Mehrdad
Jun 13 at 23:09




$begingroup$
Yeah it didn't take Einstein to realize this...
$endgroup$
– Mehrdad
Jun 13 at 23:09













58
















$begingroup$

You do, but it's too small to really notice



First, it's not correct to say that we don't feel Earth's rotation because it's rotating at a constant speed.



Think about driving a car, or riding in an airplane. Whether you're cruising down the road at 90 kph, or soaring through the air at 900 kph, you don't really "feel the speed".



However, When you take a sharp turn, or take off from the runway, you definitely feel something. That's the acceleration. It doesn't matter if your speedometer stays steady - if you take a sudden 90 degree turn, you're going to feel it.



More relaxed turns, such as going through a roundabout, or when the airplane circles the airport before landing, are much less likely to spill your drink.



Even if Earth is spinning at a constant speed, the spin is a change in direction, which requires acceleration.



Acceleration is quite noticeable, depending on its magnitude. Even just sitting down, you can feel the pull of Earth's 9.8 m/s² gravity - your body's "weight", as it were.



So how large is the acceleration keeping Earth in orbit? About 0.0059 m/s².
What about the acceleration of Earth's rotation? A ever so slightly larger 0.0339 m/s².



Small wonder that it seems like you can't feel these forces!






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A particle in orbit is in freefall, and it doesn't feel the centripetal force. But on an extended body there is the tidal force. So standing on the Earth's surface we don't feel the full force of the Sun's gravity, we just feel the difference between the strength of the Sun's gravity on the centre of the Earth vs its strength at our location. Similar remarks apply to the tidal force due to the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 8:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you're comparing the size of an ant (in mm) to the magnitude of acceleration (in mm/s²) but that doesn't make much sense – they are completely unrelated. The ant feels the same acceleration as every other object on Earth regardless of their size.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt "Small wonder" is a saying, it doesn't have anything to do with physical size. And the answer is still no, neither size or weight has anything to do with acceleration.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 16:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @PM2Ring Depends on what you mean by "feel". You are being pulled towards the sun by the gravity. However, if you try to measure this force by standing on a scale, the scale is also being pulled towards the sun. Since the acceleration is the same for both, the sun's gravity doesn't cause anything to be registered on the scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    Jun 13 at 17:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s The Earth is not a point. The point at the centre of the Earth is in freefall around the Sun. The rest of the Earth is subject to a tidal force from the Sun because it's not at the centre point.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 14 at 3:30















58
















$begingroup$

You do, but it's too small to really notice



First, it's not correct to say that we don't feel Earth's rotation because it's rotating at a constant speed.



Think about driving a car, or riding in an airplane. Whether you're cruising down the road at 90 kph, or soaring through the air at 900 kph, you don't really "feel the speed".



However, When you take a sharp turn, or take off from the runway, you definitely feel something. That's the acceleration. It doesn't matter if your speedometer stays steady - if you take a sudden 90 degree turn, you're going to feel it.



More relaxed turns, such as going through a roundabout, or when the airplane circles the airport before landing, are much less likely to spill your drink.



Even if Earth is spinning at a constant speed, the spin is a change in direction, which requires acceleration.



Acceleration is quite noticeable, depending on its magnitude. Even just sitting down, you can feel the pull of Earth's 9.8 m/s² gravity - your body's "weight", as it were.



So how large is the acceleration keeping Earth in orbit? About 0.0059 m/s².
What about the acceleration of Earth's rotation? A ever so slightly larger 0.0339 m/s².



Small wonder that it seems like you can't feel these forces!






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A particle in orbit is in freefall, and it doesn't feel the centripetal force. But on an extended body there is the tidal force. So standing on the Earth's surface we don't feel the full force of the Sun's gravity, we just feel the difference between the strength of the Sun's gravity on the centre of the Earth vs its strength at our location. Similar remarks apply to the tidal force due to the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 8:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you're comparing the size of an ant (in mm) to the magnitude of acceleration (in mm/s²) but that doesn't make much sense – they are completely unrelated. The ant feels the same acceleration as every other object on Earth regardless of their size.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt "Small wonder" is a saying, it doesn't have anything to do with physical size. And the answer is still no, neither size or weight has anything to do with acceleration.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 16:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @PM2Ring Depends on what you mean by "feel". You are being pulled towards the sun by the gravity. However, if you try to measure this force by standing on a scale, the scale is also being pulled towards the sun. Since the acceleration is the same for both, the sun's gravity doesn't cause anything to be registered on the scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    Jun 13 at 17:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s The Earth is not a point. The point at the centre of the Earth is in freefall around the Sun. The rest of the Earth is subject to a tidal force from the Sun because it's not at the centre point.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 14 at 3:30













58














58










58







$begingroup$

You do, but it's too small to really notice



First, it's not correct to say that we don't feel Earth's rotation because it's rotating at a constant speed.



Think about driving a car, or riding in an airplane. Whether you're cruising down the road at 90 kph, or soaring through the air at 900 kph, you don't really "feel the speed".



However, When you take a sharp turn, or take off from the runway, you definitely feel something. That's the acceleration. It doesn't matter if your speedometer stays steady - if you take a sudden 90 degree turn, you're going to feel it.



More relaxed turns, such as going through a roundabout, or when the airplane circles the airport before landing, are much less likely to spill your drink.



Even if Earth is spinning at a constant speed, the spin is a change in direction, which requires acceleration.



Acceleration is quite noticeable, depending on its magnitude. Even just sitting down, you can feel the pull of Earth's 9.8 m/s² gravity - your body's "weight", as it were.



So how large is the acceleration keeping Earth in orbit? About 0.0059 m/s².
What about the acceleration of Earth's rotation? A ever so slightly larger 0.0339 m/s².



Small wonder that it seems like you can't feel these forces!






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



You do, but it's too small to really notice



First, it's not correct to say that we don't feel Earth's rotation because it's rotating at a constant speed.



Think about driving a car, or riding in an airplane. Whether you're cruising down the road at 90 kph, or soaring through the air at 900 kph, you don't really "feel the speed".



However, When you take a sharp turn, or take off from the runway, you definitely feel something. That's the acceleration. It doesn't matter if your speedometer stays steady - if you take a sudden 90 degree turn, you're going to feel it.



More relaxed turns, such as going through a roundabout, or when the airplane circles the airport before landing, are much less likely to spill your drink.



Even if Earth is spinning at a constant speed, the spin is a change in direction, which requires acceleration.



Acceleration is quite noticeable, depending on its magnitude. Even just sitting down, you can feel the pull of Earth's 9.8 m/s² gravity - your body's "weight", as it were.



So how large is the acceleration keeping Earth in orbit? About 0.0059 m/s².
What about the acceleration of Earth's rotation? A ever so slightly larger 0.0339 m/s².



Small wonder that it seems like you can't feel these forces!







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered Jun 13 at 3:04









ap55ap55

4611 gold badge1 silver badge3 bronze badges




4611 gold badge1 silver badge3 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A particle in orbit is in freefall, and it doesn't feel the centripetal force. But on an extended body there is the tidal force. So standing on the Earth's surface we don't feel the full force of the Sun's gravity, we just feel the difference between the strength of the Sun's gravity on the centre of the Earth vs its strength at our location. Similar remarks apply to the tidal force due to the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 8:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you're comparing the size of an ant (in mm) to the magnitude of acceleration (in mm/s²) but that doesn't make much sense – they are completely unrelated. The ant feels the same acceleration as every other object on Earth regardless of their size.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt "Small wonder" is a saying, it doesn't have anything to do with physical size. And the answer is still no, neither size or weight has anything to do with acceleration.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 16:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @PM2Ring Depends on what you mean by "feel". You are being pulled towards the sun by the gravity. However, if you try to measure this force by standing on a scale, the scale is also being pulled towards the sun. Since the acceleration is the same for both, the sun's gravity doesn't cause anything to be registered on the scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    Jun 13 at 17:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s The Earth is not a point. The point at the centre of the Earth is in freefall around the Sun. The rest of the Earth is subject to a tidal force from the Sun because it's not at the centre point.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 14 at 3:30












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A particle in orbit is in freefall, and it doesn't feel the centripetal force. But on an extended body there is the tidal force. So standing on the Earth's surface we don't feel the full force of the Sun's gravity, we just feel the difference between the strength of the Sun's gravity on the centre of the Earth vs its strength at our location. Similar remarks apply to the tidal force due to the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 8:49






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you're comparing the size of an ant (in mm) to the magnitude of acceleration (in mm/s²) but that doesn't make much sense – they are completely unrelated. The ant feels the same acceleration as every other object on Earth regardless of their size.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 14:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Neyt "Small wonder" is a saying, it doesn't have anything to do with physical size. And the answer is still no, neither size or weight has anything to do with acceleration.
    $endgroup$
    – Moyli
    Jun 13 at 16:50






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @PM2Ring Depends on what you mean by "feel". You are being pulled towards the sun by the gravity. However, if you try to measure this force by standing on a scale, the scale is also being pulled towards the sun. Since the acceleration is the same for both, the sun's gravity doesn't cause anything to be registered on the scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    Jun 13 at 17:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Draco18s The Earth is not a point. The point at the centre of the Earth is in freefall around the Sun. The rest of the Earth is subject to a tidal force from the Sun because it's not at the centre point.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 14 at 3:30







2




2




$begingroup$
A particle in orbit is in freefall, and it doesn't feel the centripetal force. But on an extended body there is the tidal force. So standing on the Earth's surface we don't feel the full force of the Sun's gravity, we just feel the difference between the strength of the Sun's gravity on the centre of the Earth vs its strength at our location. Similar remarks apply to the tidal force due to the Moon.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 13 at 8:49




$begingroup$
A particle in orbit is in freefall, and it doesn't feel the centripetal force. But on an extended body there is the tidal force. So standing on the Earth's surface we don't feel the full force of the Sun's gravity, we just feel the difference between the strength of the Sun's gravity on the centre of the Earth vs its strength at our location. Similar remarks apply to the tidal force due to the Moon.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 13 at 8:49




2




2




$begingroup$
@Neyt Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you're comparing the size of an ant (in mm) to the magnitude of acceleration (in mm/s²) but that doesn't make much sense – they are completely unrelated. The ant feels the same acceleration as every other object on Earth regardless of their size.
$endgroup$
– Moyli
Jun 13 at 14:26




$begingroup$
@Neyt Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you're comparing the size of an ant (in mm) to the magnitude of acceleration (in mm/s²) but that doesn't make much sense – they are completely unrelated. The ant feels the same acceleration as every other object on Earth regardless of their size.
$endgroup$
– Moyli
Jun 13 at 14:26




1




1




$begingroup$
@Neyt "Small wonder" is a saying, it doesn't have anything to do with physical size. And the answer is still no, neither size or weight has anything to do with acceleration.
$endgroup$
– Moyli
Jun 13 at 16:50




$begingroup$
@Neyt "Small wonder" is a saying, it doesn't have anything to do with physical size. And the answer is still no, neither size or weight has anything to do with acceleration.
$endgroup$
– Moyli
Jun 13 at 16:50




2




2




$begingroup$
@PM2Ring Depends on what you mean by "feel". You are being pulled towards the sun by the gravity. However, if you try to measure this force by standing on a scale, the scale is also being pulled towards the sun. Since the acceleration is the same for both, the sun's gravity doesn't cause anything to be registered on the scale.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 13 at 17:03




$begingroup$
@PM2Ring Depends on what you mean by "feel". You are being pulled towards the sun by the gravity. However, if you try to measure this force by standing on a scale, the scale is also being pulled towards the sun. Since the acceleration is the same for both, the sun's gravity doesn't cause anything to be registered on the scale.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Jun 13 at 17:03




3




3




$begingroup$
@Draco18s The Earth is not a point. The point at the centre of the Earth is in freefall around the Sun. The rest of the Earth is subject to a tidal force from the Sun because it's not at the centre point.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:30




$begingroup$
@Draco18s The Earth is not a point. The point at the centre of the Earth is in freefall around the Sun. The rest of the Earth is subject to a tidal force from the Sun because it's not at the centre point.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 14 at 3:30











12
















$begingroup$

The problem with how you're looking at it is that velocities don't cause or result from forces, but accelerations do. Think of Newton's 2nd law, $F = m a$. Circular motion is motion at constant speed but changing direction, this changing direction is a type of acceleration because velocity is a vector (has direction) and acceleration is change in velocity.



We do actually feel a difference due to this acceleration - if you think about a sphere rotating around an axis, the points on near the intersection of that axis with the surface are rotating slower than anywhere else, and so if you measure the local gravitational acceleration $g$ at the poles you get a slightly larger value than you do at the equator (about 0.3%). This is because the rotation acts in opposition to the force of gravity due to the earth's mass.



There is also a very small effect from the earth's orbit around the sun. In this case, the force due to acceleration is exactly the same as the force that holds the earth in orbit, so you can just look at the gravitational effects as done in this answer on physics.se, which came up with a value of around 26 parts per billion, or 0.0000026%. The interesting thing is that you become lighter both when the sun is overhead, and when it's directly on the opposite side of the earth to you.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    As John Rennie explains in the linked answer on Physics.SE, the force we feel from the Sun is the tidal force which arises because we're on the surface of the Earth, not at its centre.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 9:08















12
















$begingroup$

The problem with how you're looking at it is that velocities don't cause or result from forces, but accelerations do. Think of Newton's 2nd law, $F = m a$. Circular motion is motion at constant speed but changing direction, this changing direction is a type of acceleration because velocity is a vector (has direction) and acceleration is change in velocity.



We do actually feel a difference due to this acceleration - if you think about a sphere rotating around an axis, the points on near the intersection of that axis with the surface are rotating slower than anywhere else, and so if you measure the local gravitational acceleration $g$ at the poles you get a slightly larger value than you do at the equator (about 0.3%). This is because the rotation acts in opposition to the force of gravity due to the earth's mass.



There is also a very small effect from the earth's orbit around the sun. In this case, the force due to acceleration is exactly the same as the force that holds the earth in orbit, so you can just look at the gravitational effects as done in this answer on physics.se, which came up with a value of around 26 parts per billion, or 0.0000026%. The interesting thing is that you become lighter both when the sun is overhead, and when it's directly on the opposite side of the earth to you.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    As John Rennie explains in the linked answer on Physics.SE, the force we feel from the Sun is the tidal force which arises because we're on the surface of the Earth, not at its centre.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 9:08













12














12










12







$begingroup$

The problem with how you're looking at it is that velocities don't cause or result from forces, but accelerations do. Think of Newton's 2nd law, $F = m a$. Circular motion is motion at constant speed but changing direction, this changing direction is a type of acceleration because velocity is a vector (has direction) and acceleration is change in velocity.



We do actually feel a difference due to this acceleration - if you think about a sphere rotating around an axis, the points on near the intersection of that axis with the surface are rotating slower than anywhere else, and so if you measure the local gravitational acceleration $g$ at the poles you get a slightly larger value than you do at the equator (about 0.3%). This is because the rotation acts in opposition to the force of gravity due to the earth's mass.



There is also a very small effect from the earth's orbit around the sun. In this case, the force due to acceleration is exactly the same as the force that holds the earth in orbit, so you can just look at the gravitational effects as done in this answer on physics.se, which came up with a value of around 26 parts per billion, or 0.0000026%. The interesting thing is that you become lighter both when the sun is overhead, and when it's directly on the opposite side of the earth to you.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



The problem with how you're looking at it is that velocities don't cause or result from forces, but accelerations do. Think of Newton's 2nd law, $F = m a$. Circular motion is motion at constant speed but changing direction, this changing direction is a type of acceleration because velocity is a vector (has direction) and acceleration is change in velocity.



We do actually feel a difference due to this acceleration - if you think about a sphere rotating around an axis, the points on near the intersection of that axis with the surface are rotating slower than anywhere else, and so if you measure the local gravitational acceleration $g$ at the poles you get a slightly larger value than you do at the equator (about 0.3%). This is because the rotation acts in opposition to the force of gravity due to the earth's mass.



There is also a very small effect from the earth's orbit around the sun. In this case, the force due to acceleration is exactly the same as the force that holds the earth in orbit, so you can just look at the gravitational effects as done in this answer on physics.se, which came up with a value of around 26 parts per billion, or 0.0000026%. The interesting thing is that you become lighter both when the sun is overhead, and when it's directly on the opposite side of the earth to you.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered Jun 12 at 21:25









llamallama

2736 bronze badges




2736 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    As John Rennie explains in the linked answer on Physics.SE, the force we feel from the Sun is the tidal force which arises because we're on the surface of the Earth, not at its centre.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 9:08
















  • $begingroup$
    As John Rennie explains in the linked answer on Physics.SE, the force we feel from the Sun is the tidal force which arises because we're on the surface of the Earth, not at its centre.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 13 at 9:08















$begingroup$
As John Rennie explains in the linked answer on Physics.SE, the force we feel from the Sun is the tidal force which arises because we're on the surface of the Earth, not at its centre.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 13 at 9:08




$begingroup$
As John Rennie explains in the linked answer on Physics.SE, the force we feel from the Sun is the tidal force which arises because we're on the surface of the Earth, not at its centre.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
Jun 13 at 9:08











9
















$begingroup$

I will give a biologically motivated answer to this question:



Feeling the Earth rotation carries no meaning to us. It is always approximately the same and we will blend out such background information and concentrate on news that are really important to us: Is there a danger approaching? Is the some food to gain? What are our peers doing?



Because there was no evolutionary pressure to feel the Earth rotation, we did not develop a sense for it. The fact that it is weak and really difficult to measure adds to this. We need an apparatus like Foucault's pendulum to see its effect.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It could be used for navigation, like gyrocompasses do. But human senses are not sensitive enough.
    $endgroup$
    – jpa
    Jun 13 at 18:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I know Foucault's pendula are capable of detecting (latitude adjusted) rotation. But revolution? Really? How does that compare with the wobble in period caused by ambient thermal cycling of the pendulum's length (or the room's dimensions, since one may make a pendulum out of Invar or its friends, but one does not spend the money to make such a room)?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Jun 14 at 3:30















9
















$begingroup$

I will give a biologically motivated answer to this question:



Feeling the Earth rotation carries no meaning to us. It is always approximately the same and we will blend out such background information and concentrate on news that are really important to us: Is there a danger approaching? Is the some food to gain? What are our peers doing?



Because there was no evolutionary pressure to feel the Earth rotation, we did not develop a sense for it. The fact that it is weak and really difficult to measure adds to this. We need an apparatus like Foucault's pendulum to see its effect.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It could be used for navigation, like gyrocompasses do. But human senses are not sensitive enough.
    $endgroup$
    – jpa
    Jun 13 at 18:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I know Foucault's pendula are capable of detecting (latitude adjusted) rotation. But revolution? Really? How does that compare with the wobble in period caused by ambient thermal cycling of the pendulum's length (or the room's dimensions, since one may make a pendulum out of Invar or its friends, but one does not spend the money to make such a room)?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Jun 14 at 3:30













9














9










9







$begingroup$

I will give a biologically motivated answer to this question:



Feeling the Earth rotation carries no meaning to us. It is always approximately the same and we will blend out such background information and concentrate on news that are really important to us: Is there a danger approaching? Is the some food to gain? What are our peers doing?



Because there was no evolutionary pressure to feel the Earth rotation, we did not develop a sense for it. The fact that it is weak and really difficult to measure adds to this. We need an apparatus like Foucault's pendulum to see its effect.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



I will give a biologically motivated answer to this question:



Feeling the Earth rotation carries no meaning to us. It is always approximately the same and we will blend out such background information and concentrate on news that are really important to us: Is there a danger approaching? Is the some food to gain? What are our peers doing?



Because there was no evolutionary pressure to feel the Earth rotation, we did not develop a sense for it. The fact that it is weak and really difficult to measure adds to this. We need an apparatus like Foucault's pendulum to see its effect.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered Jun 13 at 16:44









jknappenjknappen

4813 silver badges10 bronze badges




4813 silver badges10 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It could be used for navigation, like gyrocompasses do. But human senses are not sensitive enough.
    $endgroup$
    – jpa
    Jun 13 at 18:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I know Foucault's pendula are capable of detecting (latitude adjusted) rotation. But revolution? Really? How does that compare with the wobble in period caused by ambient thermal cycling of the pendulum's length (or the room's dimensions, since one may make a pendulum out of Invar or its friends, but one does not spend the money to make such a room)?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Jun 14 at 3:30












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It could be used for navigation, like gyrocompasses do. But human senses are not sensitive enough.
    $endgroup$
    – jpa
    Jun 13 at 18:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I know Foucault's pendula are capable of detecting (latitude adjusted) rotation. But revolution? Really? How does that compare with the wobble in period caused by ambient thermal cycling of the pendulum's length (or the room's dimensions, since one may make a pendulum out of Invar or its friends, but one does not spend the money to make such a room)?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Jun 14 at 3:30







1




1




$begingroup$
It could be used for navigation, like gyrocompasses do. But human senses are not sensitive enough.
$endgroup$
– jpa
Jun 13 at 18:41




$begingroup$
It could be used for navigation, like gyrocompasses do. But human senses are not sensitive enough.
$endgroup$
– jpa
Jun 13 at 18:41




1




1




$begingroup$
I know Foucault's pendula are capable of detecting (latitude adjusted) rotation. But revolution? Really? How does that compare with the wobble in period caused by ambient thermal cycling of the pendulum's length (or the room's dimensions, since one may make a pendulum out of Invar or its friends, but one does not spend the money to make such a room)?
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jun 14 at 3:30




$begingroup$
I know Foucault's pendula are capable of detecting (latitude adjusted) rotation. But revolution? Really? How does that compare with the wobble in period caused by ambient thermal cycling of the pendulum's length (or the room's dimensions, since one may make a pendulum out of Invar or its friends, but one does not spend the money to make such a room)?
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Jun 14 at 3:30


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32262%2fwhy-cant-we-feel-the-earths-revolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

xrandr — how to find the correct RGB full spectrum output command for my systemHow to get second display to work alongside primary display?Unable to change the refresh rate to 60hz with xrandrUbuntu 16.04 external monitors black screen “Could not set the configuration for CRTC”Ubuntu 18.04 Monitor not recognizedXubuntu 18.04 does not detect external monitors connected via USB-C hubLaptop running Ubuntu 18.04 and Nvidia GPU does not detect HDMI display

Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region