Why is Ni[(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] tetrahedral?What kind of isomerism does Ni(PPh3)2Cl2 have and what is their IUPAC name?Tetrahedral or Square PlanarWhy does Fe(CO)₄ adopt a tetrahedral, as opposed to square planar, geometry?Why is [PdCl4]2- square planar whereas [NiCl4]2- is tetrahedral?Crystal Field Splitting of d-Orbitals in Octahedral and Tetrahedral Ligand FieldsWhy do tetrahedral complexes have approximately 4/9 the field split of octahedral complexes?Why does steric hindrance cause a d8 complex to have a tetrahedral geometry rather than a square planar geometry?
Car as a good investment
I need an automatic way of making a lot of numbered folders
Should I respond to a sabotage accusation e-mail at work?
What would be the effect of a giant magical fireball burning in the ocean?
Is there any research on the development of attacks against artificial intelligence systems?
Did Terry Pratchett ever explain the inspiration behind the Luggage?
How are Aircraft Noses Designed?
Sum of all digits in a string
On notice period - coworker I need to train is giving me the silent treatment
How long does it take to sail to Evermeet from the Neverwinter harbor?
TikZ, forest and star macro
rasterio "invalid dtype: 'bool'"
Why doesn't hot charcoal glow blue?
In the twin paradox does the returning twin also come back permanently length contracted flatter than the twin on Earth?
How to increment the value of a (decimal) variable (with leading zero) by +1?
Replace spaces with comma but not in the whole line
Can elves trance in armor without any downsides?
Is it possible for a country to develop the equivalent of a Second Industrial Revolution while under a war of attrition?
What actually is "unallocated space"?
Does code obfuscation give any measurable security benefit?
How does a ball bearing door hinge work?
Is it poor workplace etiquette to display signs of relative "wealth" at work when others are struggling financially?
How can you tell apart the pronounciation at the end between the "meine" and "meiner" in the daily spoken situation?
Are dead worlds a good galactic barrier?
Why is Ni[(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] tetrahedral?
What kind of isomerism does Ni(PPh3)2Cl2 have and what is their IUPAC name?Tetrahedral or Square PlanarWhy does Fe(CO)₄ adopt a tetrahedral, as opposed to square planar, geometry?Why is [PdCl4]2- square planar whereas [NiCl4]2- is tetrahedral?Crystal Field Splitting of d-Orbitals in Octahedral and Tetrahedral Ligand FieldsWhy do tetrahedral complexes have approximately 4/9 the field split of octahedral complexes?Why does steric hindrance cause a d8 complex to have a tetrahedral geometry rather than a square planar geometry?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Since PPh₃ is strong field ligand and, the famous Wilkinson's catalyst, which also possess this ligand is square planar, then what makes the above complex tetrahedral?
coordination-compounds transition-metals crystal-field-theory organotransition-metal-chemistry ligand-field-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Since PPh₃ is strong field ligand and, the famous Wilkinson's catalyst, which also possess this ligand is square planar, then what makes the above complex tetrahedral?
coordination-compounds transition-metals crystal-field-theory organotransition-metal-chemistry ligand-field-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Since PPh₃ is strong field ligand and, the famous Wilkinson's catalyst, which also possess this ligand is square planar, then what makes the above complex tetrahedral?
coordination-compounds transition-metals crystal-field-theory organotransition-metal-chemistry ligand-field-theory
$endgroup$
Since PPh₃ is strong field ligand and, the famous Wilkinson's catalyst, which also possess this ligand is square planar, then what makes the above complex tetrahedral?
coordination-compounds transition-metals crystal-field-theory organotransition-metal-chemistry ligand-field-theory
coordination-compounds transition-metals crystal-field-theory organotransition-metal-chemistry ligand-field-theory
edited May 19 at 12:02
andselisk♦
22.4k8 gold badges78 silver badges149 bronze badges
22.4k8 gold badges78 silver badges149 bronze badges
asked May 19 at 11:56
user226375user226375
3508 bronze badges
3508 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We sometimes call this type of complex 'pseudotetrahedral' since there is an isomerism from a tetrahedral to a square planar complex possible. I was unable to find the original work here but this link gives some information. As you already mentioned there are two strong and two weak ligands so it's hard to tell how strong the ligand field splitting will be. For your particular complex it seems to be right on the spot where it would change from one to the other so depending on what you do you can influence the equilibrium. From what I read this may depend on the ability of the solvent to coordinate to the complex as well, the temperature, etc.
This is also mentioned in Earnshaw's Chemistry of the elements
Planar-tetrahedral equilibria. Compounds
such as $ce[NiBr2(PEtPh2)2]$ mentioned above as
well as a number of sec-alkylsalicylaldiminato
derivatives (i.e. Me in Fig. 27.6b replaced by
a sec-alkyl group) dissolve in non-coordinating
solvents such as chloroform or toluene to give
solutions whose spectra and magnetic properties
are temperature-dependent and indicate the presence
of an equilibrium mixture of diamagnetic
planar and paramagnetic tetrahedral molecules.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can it be justified by saying that due to steric repulsions of the bulky PPh3, to minimise repulsions, the equilibrium is on the side of tetrahedral form?
$endgroup$
– user226375
May 19 at 13:52
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II), or $ceNiCl2[P(C6H5)3]2$ in square planar form is red and diamagnetic. The blue form is paramagnetic and features tetrahedral Ni(II) centers. Both tetrahedral and square planar isomers coexist in solutions. Weak field ligands, favor tetrahedral geometry and strong field ligands favor the square planar isomer. Both weak field ($ceCl−$) and strong field ($cePPh3$) ligands comprise $ceNiCl2(PPh3)2$, hence this compound is borderline between the two geometries.
Steric effects also affect the equilibrium; larger ligands favoring the less crowded tetrahedral geometry.[1]
Reference
- Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.).
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115553%2fwhy-is-nipph%25e2%2582%2583%25e2%2582%2582cl%25e2%2582%2582-tetrahedral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We sometimes call this type of complex 'pseudotetrahedral' since there is an isomerism from a tetrahedral to a square planar complex possible. I was unable to find the original work here but this link gives some information. As you already mentioned there are two strong and two weak ligands so it's hard to tell how strong the ligand field splitting will be. For your particular complex it seems to be right on the spot where it would change from one to the other so depending on what you do you can influence the equilibrium. From what I read this may depend on the ability of the solvent to coordinate to the complex as well, the temperature, etc.
This is also mentioned in Earnshaw's Chemistry of the elements
Planar-tetrahedral equilibria. Compounds
such as $ce[NiBr2(PEtPh2)2]$ mentioned above as
well as a number of sec-alkylsalicylaldiminato
derivatives (i.e. Me in Fig. 27.6b replaced by
a sec-alkyl group) dissolve in non-coordinating
solvents such as chloroform or toluene to give
solutions whose spectra and magnetic properties
are temperature-dependent and indicate the presence
of an equilibrium mixture of diamagnetic
planar and paramagnetic tetrahedral molecules.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can it be justified by saying that due to steric repulsions of the bulky PPh3, to minimise repulsions, the equilibrium is on the side of tetrahedral form?
$endgroup$
– user226375
May 19 at 13:52
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
We sometimes call this type of complex 'pseudotetrahedral' since there is an isomerism from a tetrahedral to a square planar complex possible. I was unable to find the original work here but this link gives some information. As you already mentioned there are two strong and two weak ligands so it's hard to tell how strong the ligand field splitting will be. For your particular complex it seems to be right on the spot where it would change from one to the other so depending on what you do you can influence the equilibrium. From what I read this may depend on the ability of the solvent to coordinate to the complex as well, the temperature, etc.
This is also mentioned in Earnshaw's Chemistry of the elements
Planar-tetrahedral equilibria. Compounds
such as $ce[NiBr2(PEtPh2)2]$ mentioned above as
well as a number of sec-alkylsalicylaldiminato
derivatives (i.e. Me in Fig. 27.6b replaced by
a sec-alkyl group) dissolve in non-coordinating
solvents such as chloroform or toluene to give
solutions whose spectra and magnetic properties
are temperature-dependent and indicate the presence
of an equilibrium mixture of diamagnetic
planar and paramagnetic tetrahedral molecules.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can it be justified by saying that due to steric repulsions of the bulky PPh3, to minimise repulsions, the equilibrium is on the side of tetrahedral form?
$endgroup$
– user226375
May 19 at 13:52
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
We sometimes call this type of complex 'pseudotetrahedral' since there is an isomerism from a tetrahedral to a square planar complex possible. I was unable to find the original work here but this link gives some information. As you already mentioned there are two strong and two weak ligands so it's hard to tell how strong the ligand field splitting will be. For your particular complex it seems to be right on the spot where it would change from one to the other so depending on what you do you can influence the equilibrium. From what I read this may depend on the ability of the solvent to coordinate to the complex as well, the temperature, etc.
This is also mentioned in Earnshaw's Chemistry of the elements
Planar-tetrahedral equilibria. Compounds
such as $ce[NiBr2(PEtPh2)2]$ mentioned above as
well as a number of sec-alkylsalicylaldiminato
derivatives (i.e. Me in Fig. 27.6b replaced by
a sec-alkyl group) dissolve in non-coordinating
solvents such as chloroform or toluene to give
solutions whose spectra and magnetic properties
are temperature-dependent and indicate the presence
of an equilibrium mixture of diamagnetic
planar and paramagnetic tetrahedral molecules.
$endgroup$
We sometimes call this type of complex 'pseudotetrahedral' since there is an isomerism from a tetrahedral to a square planar complex possible. I was unable to find the original work here but this link gives some information. As you already mentioned there are two strong and two weak ligands so it's hard to tell how strong the ligand field splitting will be. For your particular complex it seems to be right on the spot where it would change from one to the other so depending on what you do you can influence the equilibrium. From what I read this may depend on the ability of the solvent to coordinate to the complex as well, the temperature, etc.
This is also mentioned in Earnshaw's Chemistry of the elements
Planar-tetrahedral equilibria. Compounds
such as $ce[NiBr2(PEtPh2)2]$ mentioned above as
well as a number of sec-alkylsalicylaldiminato
derivatives (i.e. Me in Fig. 27.6b replaced by
a sec-alkyl group) dissolve in non-coordinating
solvents such as chloroform or toluene to give
solutions whose spectra and magnetic properties
are temperature-dependent and indicate the presence
of an equilibrium mixture of diamagnetic
planar and paramagnetic tetrahedral molecules.
answered May 19 at 12:40
JustanotherchemistJustanotherchemist
2,3197 silver badges23 bronze badges
2,3197 silver badges23 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Can it be justified by saying that due to steric repulsions of the bulky PPh3, to minimise repulsions, the equilibrium is on the side of tetrahedral form?
$endgroup$
– user226375
May 19 at 13:52
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Can it be justified by saying that due to steric repulsions of the bulky PPh3, to minimise repulsions, the equilibrium is on the side of tetrahedral form?
$endgroup$
– user226375
May 19 at 13:52
1
1
$begingroup$
Can it be justified by saying that due to steric repulsions of the bulky PPh3, to minimise repulsions, the equilibrium is on the side of tetrahedral form?
$endgroup$
– user226375
May 19 at 13:52
$begingroup$
Can it be justified by saying that due to steric repulsions of the bulky PPh3, to minimise repulsions, the equilibrium is on the side of tetrahedral form?
$endgroup$
– user226375
May 19 at 13:52
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II), or $ceNiCl2[P(C6H5)3]2$ in square planar form is red and diamagnetic. The blue form is paramagnetic and features tetrahedral Ni(II) centers. Both tetrahedral and square planar isomers coexist in solutions. Weak field ligands, favor tetrahedral geometry and strong field ligands favor the square planar isomer. Both weak field ($ceCl−$) and strong field ($cePPh3$) ligands comprise $ceNiCl2(PPh3)2$, hence this compound is borderline between the two geometries.
Steric effects also affect the equilibrium; larger ligands favoring the less crowded tetrahedral geometry.[1]
Reference
- Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.).
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II), or $ceNiCl2[P(C6H5)3]2$ in square planar form is red and diamagnetic. The blue form is paramagnetic and features tetrahedral Ni(II) centers. Both tetrahedral and square planar isomers coexist in solutions. Weak field ligands, favor tetrahedral geometry and strong field ligands favor the square planar isomer. Both weak field ($ceCl−$) and strong field ($cePPh3$) ligands comprise $ceNiCl2(PPh3)2$, hence this compound is borderline between the two geometries.
Steric effects also affect the equilibrium; larger ligands favoring the less crowded tetrahedral geometry.[1]
Reference
- Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.).
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II), or $ceNiCl2[P(C6H5)3]2$ in square planar form is red and diamagnetic. The blue form is paramagnetic and features tetrahedral Ni(II) centers. Both tetrahedral and square planar isomers coexist in solutions. Weak field ligands, favor tetrahedral geometry and strong field ligands favor the square planar isomer. Both weak field ($ceCl−$) and strong field ($cePPh3$) ligands comprise $ceNiCl2(PPh3)2$, hence this compound is borderline between the two geometries.
Steric effects also affect the equilibrium; larger ligands favoring the less crowded tetrahedral geometry.[1]
Reference
- Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.).
$endgroup$
Dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II), or $ceNiCl2[P(C6H5)3]2$ in square planar form is red and diamagnetic. The blue form is paramagnetic and features tetrahedral Ni(II) centers. Both tetrahedral and square planar isomers coexist in solutions. Weak field ligands, favor tetrahedral geometry and strong field ligands favor the square planar isomer. Both weak field ($ceCl−$) and strong field ($cePPh3$) ligands comprise $ceNiCl2(PPh3)2$, hence this compound is borderline between the two geometries.
Steric effects also affect the equilibrium; larger ligands favoring the less crowded tetrahedral geometry.[1]
Reference
- Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.).
edited May 19 at 15:11
Gaurang Tandon
5,5048 gold badges30 silver badges72 bronze badges
5,5048 gold badges30 silver badges72 bronze badges
answered May 19 at 14:45
Chakravarthy KalyanChakravarthy Kalyan
3,0321 gold badge5 silver badges25 bronze badges
3,0321 gold badge5 silver badges25 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115553%2fwhy-is-nipph%25e2%2582%2583%25e2%2582%2582cl%25e2%2582%2582-tetrahedral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown