A verb to describe specific positioning of three layersJameson whiskey commercial construction with implicit verbIs there a verb that fits in the pattern: quarter, third, halve (divide), [???], double, triple, quadruple. . .?Alternative to “to be” in copulae that cannot be understood as definingVerb for “say cryptically”Is there an alternate non-anatomical word to describe the action of “dilating”?What is a person who fakes responses on a survey?Single-word-request: a bottom vertexWhat's the best word for denoting “treat as a single item” in the specific context I describe?Is there a word for a group of numbers which have equal mantissa in some base?Hypernym for “conjunction” and “opposition”
Calculate the sum of interior angles of a polygon
vim: (E)dit anyway without prompting
What is this sound, instrument? (Rheingold, Wagner)
Being flown out for an interview, is it ok to ask to stay a while longer to check out the area?
Bourbaki assembly brackets
What is the meaning of "Ya con hotra y como se yama mijo"?
Fantasy story about a knife that can cut holes to other dimensions
My name causes an issue with booking!
I somehow "proved" that given any LTI system, its transfer function has to be constant. What am I missing?
AR Code § 21-8-402 (2018)
What is a good way to challenge a Warlock with the Agonizing Blast invocation?
Can you cast Animate Dead on someone under effect of Feign Death?
What is the role of Shutter Speed while using a Manual Flash?
Slimy whey in store-bought yoghurt
Why do the US media keep claiming that Iran is violating their nuclear deal even though the deal was withdrawn by the US?
Do rainbows show spectral lines from the sun?
What's the name of the role of characters who buff teammates?
Why is it “Cat in the Hat”?
Explanatory vs Non-explanatory Proofs
Is current polling about Democrats lead over Trump trustworthy?
HR trying to sabotage my wife's work because we're married
How to avoid answering "what were you sick with"?
Using fancyref in TeX Live 2019 fails with undefined control sequence
Bash to check if directory exist. If not create with an array
A verb to describe specific positioning of three layers
Jameson whiskey commercial construction with implicit verbIs there a verb that fits in the pattern: quarter, third, halve (divide), [???], double, triple, quadruple. . .?Alternative to “to be” in copulae that cannot be understood as definingVerb for “say cryptically”Is there an alternate non-anatomical word to describe the action of “dilating”?What is a person who fakes responses on a survey?Single-word-request: a bottom vertexWhat's the best word for denoting “treat as a single item” in the specific context I describe?Is there a word for a group of numbers which have equal mantissa in some base?Hypernym for “conjunction” and “opposition”
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I am describing the positioning of three layers stacked on top of each other in a scientific paper. The first and third layer made from the same material, but the layer in between (i.e. the second layer) differs from the two other.
I would to put the description in the following context.
The module consist of two layers of A that ....[a verb]...a layer of B
What verbs best suits the context here?
single-word-requests verbs
|
show 2 more comments
I am describing the positioning of three layers stacked on top of each other in a scientific paper. The first and third layer made from the same material, but the layer in between (i.e. the second layer) differs from the two other.
I would to put the description in the following context.
The module consist of two layers of A that ....[a verb]...a layer of B
What verbs best suits the context here?
single-word-requests verbs
8
Sounds like a sandwich to me.
– Xanne
Jul 17 at 7:09
3
".. consists of a layer of B between two layers of A"
– Fattie
Jul 17 at 17:01
consider interstitial layer
– Phil Sweet
Jul 17 at 18:48
@Fattie - between isn't a verb. But separating is.
– Mazura
Jul 18 at 1:57
1
@DaveInCaz The layers have planer shape and stacked on top of each other like glass sheets
– mo adib
Jul 20 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
I am describing the positioning of three layers stacked on top of each other in a scientific paper. The first and third layer made from the same material, but the layer in between (i.e. the second layer) differs from the two other.
I would to put the description in the following context.
The module consist of two layers of A that ....[a verb]...a layer of B
What verbs best suits the context here?
single-word-requests verbs
I am describing the positioning of three layers stacked on top of each other in a scientific paper. The first and third layer made from the same material, but the layer in between (i.e. the second layer) differs from the two other.
I would to put the description in the following context.
The module consist of two layers of A that ....[a verb]...a layer of B
What verbs best suits the context here?
single-word-requests verbs
single-word-requests verbs
edited Jul 17 at 19:19
Michael Rybkin
5,3223 gold badges19 silver badges47 bronze badges
5,3223 gold badges19 silver badges47 bronze badges
asked Jul 17 at 6:58
mo adibmo adib
515 bronze badges
515 bronze badges
8
Sounds like a sandwich to me.
– Xanne
Jul 17 at 7:09
3
".. consists of a layer of B between two layers of A"
– Fattie
Jul 17 at 17:01
consider interstitial layer
– Phil Sweet
Jul 17 at 18:48
@Fattie - between isn't a verb. But separating is.
– Mazura
Jul 18 at 1:57
1
@DaveInCaz The layers have planer shape and stacked on top of each other like glass sheets
– mo adib
Jul 20 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
8
Sounds like a sandwich to me.
– Xanne
Jul 17 at 7:09
3
".. consists of a layer of B between two layers of A"
– Fattie
Jul 17 at 17:01
consider interstitial layer
– Phil Sweet
Jul 17 at 18:48
@Fattie - between isn't a verb. But separating is.
– Mazura
Jul 18 at 1:57
1
@DaveInCaz The layers have planer shape and stacked on top of each other like glass sheets
– mo adib
Jul 20 at 18:44
8
8
Sounds like a sandwich to me.
– Xanne
Jul 17 at 7:09
Sounds like a sandwich to me.
– Xanne
Jul 17 at 7:09
3
3
".. consists of a layer of B between two layers of A"
– Fattie
Jul 17 at 17:01
".. consists of a layer of B between two layers of A"
– Fattie
Jul 17 at 17:01
consider interstitial layer
– Phil Sweet
Jul 17 at 18:48
consider interstitial layer
– Phil Sweet
Jul 17 at 18:48
@Fattie - between isn't a verb. But separating is.
– Mazura
Jul 18 at 1:57
@Fattie - between isn't a verb. But separating is.
– Mazura
Jul 18 at 1:57
1
1
@DaveInCaz The layers have planer shape and stacked on top of each other like glass sheets
– mo adib
Jul 20 at 18:44
@DaveInCaz The layers have planer shape and stacked on top of each other like glass sheets
– mo adib
Jul 20 at 18:44
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
An appropriate word would be:
sandwich MW
transitive verb
1 : to make into or as if into a sandwich
especially : to insert or enclose between usually two things of another quality or character
As in The module consists of two layers of A that sandwich a layer of B.
However, I think a more natural phrasing uses sandwiched by:
The module consists of a layer of B sandwiched by two layers of A
The may not sound like the most scientific term, but it is frequently used in composite material papers. See this article that lists "sandwich structures" as one of its keywords. Other articles can be found by using similar search terms.
There is nothing unscientific about this usage. Sandwich is a perfectly respectable verb.
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:13
2
"Sandwiched between" sounds much more natural to me than "sandwiched by", and is a lot more common, too :)
– psmears
Jul 18 at 12:25
And for what it's worth "Sandwich" does appear in the technical language of Calculus: The Sandwich Theorem (Also called the Squeeze Theorem). I'm sure I could find a paper on arXiv that uses the sandwich language. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem
– Thomas Markov
Jul 18 at 12:59
add a comment
|
While the verb sandwich will be readily understood, yet another word which should work is flank.
The module consist of two layers of A that flank a layer of B
Lexico/ODO:
flank
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Be on each or on one side of.
‘Two black leather sofas flanked a low table in front of the receptionist, and Wendy chose one.’
This works, but it doesn't include two specific meanings of sandwiched: close physical contact, and flat layers.
– Goodbye Ms Chipps
Jul 17 at 19:47
3
Flank suggests side-by-side contact, instead of a vertical stacking. And why use it anyway, when sandwich is perfect for the job?
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:11
add a comment
|
What you're asking for is a verb, however what you're describing here is the position of things relative to other things. So (in my opinion) what fits better here is a preposition.
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, and two adjacent layers of A"
You could also use adjoining:
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, with two adjoining layers of A"
3
These both sound somewhat ambiguous to me as to the ordering of the layers. It's not clear if the adjacent*/*adjoining describes the two layers of A in relation to each other, or each layer of A in relation to the layer of B.
– Chris H
Jul 18 at 7:43
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505307%2fa-verb-to-describe-specific-positioning-of-three-layers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
An appropriate word would be:
sandwich MW
transitive verb
1 : to make into or as if into a sandwich
especially : to insert or enclose between usually two things of another quality or character
As in The module consists of two layers of A that sandwich a layer of B.
However, I think a more natural phrasing uses sandwiched by:
The module consists of a layer of B sandwiched by two layers of A
The may not sound like the most scientific term, but it is frequently used in composite material papers. See this article that lists "sandwich structures" as one of its keywords. Other articles can be found by using similar search terms.
There is nothing unscientific about this usage. Sandwich is a perfectly respectable verb.
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:13
2
"Sandwiched between" sounds much more natural to me than "sandwiched by", and is a lot more common, too :)
– psmears
Jul 18 at 12:25
And for what it's worth "Sandwich" does appear in the technical language of Calculus: The Sandwich Theorem (Also called the Squeeze Theorem). I'm sure I could find a paper on arXiv that uses the sandwich language. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem
– Thomas Markov
Jul 18 at 12:59
add a comment
|
An appropriate word would be:
sandwich MW
transitive verb
1 : to make into or as if into a sandwich
especially : to insert or enclose between usually two things of another quality or character
As in The module consists of two layers of A that sandwich a layer of B.
However, I think a more natural phrasing uses sandwiched by:
The module consists of a layer of B sandwiched by two layers of A
The may not sound like the most scientific term, but it is frequently used in composite material papers. See this article that lists "sandwich structures" as one of its keywords. Other articles can be found by using similar search terms.
There is nothing unscientific about this usage. Sandwich is a perfectly respectable verb.
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:13
2
"Sandwiched between" sounds much more natural to me than "sandwiched by", and is a lot more common, too :)
– psmears
Jul 18 at 12:25
And for what it's worth "Sandwich" does appear in the technical language of Calculus: The Sandwich Theorem (Also called the Squeeze Theorem). I'm sure I could find a paper on arXiv that uses the sandwich language. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem
– Thomas Markov
Jul 18 at 12:59
add a comment
|
An appropriate word would be:
sandwich MW
transitive verb
1 : to make into or as if into a sandwich
especially : to insert or enclose between usually two things of another quality or character
As in The module consists of two layers of A that sandwich a layer of B.
However, I think a more natural phrasing uses sandwiched by:
The module consists of a layer of B sandwiched by two layers of A
The may not sound like the most scientific term, but it is frequently used in composite material papers. See this article that lists "sandwich structures" as one of its keywords. Other articles can be found by using similar search terms.
An appropriate word would be:
sandwich MW
transitive verb
1 : to make into or as if into a sandwich
especially : to insert or enclose between usually two things of another quality or character
As in The module consists of two layers of A that sandwich a layer of B.
However, I think a more natural phrasing uses sandwiched by:
The module consists of a layer of B sandwiched by two layers of A
The may not sound like the most scientific term, but it is frequently used in composite material papers. See this article that lists "sandwich structures" as one of its keywords. Other articles can be found by using similar search terms.
answered Jul 17 at 7:08
katatahitokatatahito
1,7292 silver badges14 bronze badges
1,7292 silver badges14 bronze badges
There is nothing unscientific about this usage. Sandwich is a perfectly respectable verb.
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:13
2
"Sandwiched between" sounds much more natural to me than "sandwiched by", and is a lot more common, too :)
– psmears
Jul 18 at 12:25
And for what it's worth "Sandwich" does appear in the technical language of Calculus: The Sandwich Theorem (Also called the Squeeze Theorem). I'm sure I could find a paper on arXiv that uses the sandwich language. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem
– Thomas Markov
Jul 18 at 12:59
add a comment
|
There is nothing unscientific about this usage. Sandwich is a perfectly respectable verb.
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:13
2
"Sandwiched between" sounds much more natural to me than "sandwiched by", and is a lot more common, too :)
– psmears
Jul 18 at 12:25
And for what it's worth "Sandwich" does appear in the technical language of Calculus: The Sandwich Theorem (Also called the Squeeze Theorem). I'm sure I could find a paper on arXiv that uses the sandwich language. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem
– Thomas Markov
Jul 18 at 12:59
There is nothing unscientific about this usage. Sandwich is a perfectly respectable verb.
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:13
There is nothing unscientific about this usage. Sandwich is a perfectly respectable verb.
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:13
2
2
"Sandwiched between" sounds much more natural to me than "sandwiched by", and is a lot more common, too :)
– psmears
Jul 18 at 12:25
"Sandwiched between" sounds much more natural to me than "sandwiched by", and is a lot more common, too :)
– psmears
Jul 18 at 12:25
And for what it's worth "Sandwich" does appear in the technical language of Calculus: The Sandwich Theorem (Also called the Squeeze Theorem). I'm sure I could find a paper on arXiv that uses the sandwich language. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem
– Thomas Markov
Jul 18 at 12:59
And for what it's worth "Sandwich" does appear in the technical language of Calculus: The Sandwich Theorem (Also called the Squeeze Theorem). I'm sure I could find a paper on arXiv that uses the sandwich language. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem
– Thomas Markov
Jul 18 at 12:59
add a comment
|
While the verb sandwich will be readily understood, yet another word which should work is flank.
The module consist of two layers of A that flank a layer of B
Lexico/ODO:
flank
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Be on each or on one side of.
‘Two black leather sofas flanked a low table in front of the receptionist, and Wendy chose one.’
This works, but it doesn't include two specific meanings of sandwiched: close physical contact, and flat layers.
– Goodbye Ms Chipps
Jul 17 at 19:47
3
Flank suggests side-by-side contact, instead of a vertical stacking. And why use it anyway, when sandwich is perfect for the job?
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:11
add a comment
|
While the verb sandwich will be readily understood, yet another word which should work is flank.
The module consist of two layers of A that flank a layer of B
Lexico/ODO:
flank
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Be on each or on one side of.
‘Two black leather sofas flanked a low table in front of the receptionist, and Wendy chose one.’
This works, but it doesn't include two specific meanings of sandwiched: close physical contact, and flat layers.
– Goodbye Ms Chipps
Jul 17 at 19:47
3
Flank suggests side-by-side contact, instead of a vertical stacking. And why use it anyway, when sandwich is perfect for the job?
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:11
add a comment
|
While the verb sandwich will be readily understood, yet another word which should work is flank.
The module consist of two layers of A that flank a layer of B
Lexico/ODO:
flank
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Be on each or on one side of.
‘Two black leather sofas flanked a low table in front of the receptionist, and Wendy chose one.’
While the verb sandwich will be readily understood, yet another word which should work is flank.
The module consist of two layers of A that flank a layer of B
Lexico/ODO:
flank
VERB [WITH OBJECT]
1 Be on each or on one side of.
‘Two black leather sofas flanked a low table in front of the receptionist, and Wendy chose one.’
answered Jul 17 at 17:54
alwayslearningalwayslearning
26.8k6 gold badges40 silver badges96 bronze badges
26.8k6 gold badges40 silver badges96 bronze badges
This works, but it doesn't include two specific meanings of sandwiched: close physical contact, and flat layers.
– Goodbye Ms Chipps
Jul 17 at 19:47
3
Flank suggests side-by-side contact, instead of a vertical stacking. And why use it anyway, when sandwich is perfect for the job?
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:11
add a comment
|
This works, but it doesn't include two specific meanings of sandwiched: close physical contact, and flat layers.
– Goodbye Ms Chipps
Jul 17 at 19:47
3
Flank suggests side-by-side contact, instead of a vertical stacking. And why use it anyway, when sandwich is perfect for the job?
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:11
This works, but it doesn't include two specific meanings of sandwiched: close physical contact, and flat layers.
– Goodbye Ms Chipps
Jul 17 at 19:47
This works, but it doesn't include two specific meanings of sandwiched: close physical contact, and flat layers.
– Goodbye Ms Chipps
Jul 17 at 19:47
3
3
Flank suggests side-by-side contact, instead of a vertical stacking. And why use it anyway, when sandwich is perfect for the job?
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:11
Flank suggests side-by-side contact, instead of a vertical stacking. And why use it anyway, when sandwich is perfect for the job?
– TonyK
Jul 18 at 11:11
add a comment
|
What you're asking for is a verb, however what you're describing here is the position of things relative to other things. So (in my opinion) what fits better here is a preposition.
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, and two adjacent layers of A"
You could also use adjoining:
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, with two adjoining layers of A"
3
These both sound somewhat ambiguous to me as to the ordering of the layers. It's not clear if the adjacent*/*adjoining describes the two layers of A in relation to each other, or each layer of A in relation to the layer of B.
– Chris H
Jul 18 at 7:43
add a comment
|
What you're asking for is a verb, however what you're describing here is the position of things relative to other things. So (in my opinion) what fits better here is a preposition.
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, and two adjacent layers of A"
You could also use adjoining:
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, with two adjoining layers of A"
3
These both sound somewhat ambiguous to me as to the ordering of the layers. It's not clear if the adjacent*/*adjoining describes the two layers of A in relation to each other, or each layer of A in relation to the layer of B.
– Chris H
Jul 18 at 7:43
add a comment
|
What you're asking for is a verb, however what you're describing here is the position of things relative to other things. So (in my opinion) what fits better here is a preposition.
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, and two adjacent layers of A"
You could also use adjoining:
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, with two adjoining layers of A"
What you're asking for is a verb, however what you're describing here is the position of things relative to other things. So (in my opinion) what fits better here is a preposition.
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, and two adjacent layers of A"
You could also use adjoining:
"The module consists of three layers: one layer of B, with two adjoining layers of A"
answered Jul 17 at 21:48
JackJack
1
1
3
These both sound somewhat ambiguous to me as to the ordering of the layers. It's not clear if the adjacent*/*adjoining describes the two layers of A in relation to each other, or each layer of A in relation to the layer of B.
– Chris H
Jul 18 at 7:43
add a comment
|
3
These both sound somewhat ambiguous to me as to the ordering of the layers. It's not clear if the adjacent*/*adjoining describes the two layers of A in relation to each other, or each layer of A in relation to the layer of B.
– Chris H
Jul 18 at 7:43
3
3
These both sound somewhat ambiguous to me as to the ordering of the layers. It's not clear if the adjacent*/*adjoining describes the two layers of A in relation to each other, or each layer of A in relation to the layer of B.
– Chris H
Jul 18 at 7:43
These both sound somewhat ambiguous to me as to the ordering of the layers. It's not clear if the adjacent*/*adjoining describes the two layers of A in relation to each other, or each layer of A in relation to the layer of B.
– Chris H
Jul 18 at 7:43
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505307%2fa-verb-to-describe-specific-positioning-of-three-layers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
8
Sounds like a sandwich to me.
– Xanne
Jul 17 at 7:09
3
".. consists of a layer of B between two layers of A"
– Fattie
Jul 17 at 17:01
consider interstitial layer
– Phil Sweet
Jul 17 at 18:48
@Fattie - between isn't a verb. But separating is.
– Mazura
Jul 18 at 1:57
1
@DaveInCaz The layers have planer shape and stacked on top of each other like glass sheets
– mo adib
Jul 20 at 18:44