Bsrgvty

Considering the power dissipation of a transistor

Mixing 3.5 hdd and 2.5 hdd in LSI RAID 1

What is a Sexy Phrase™?

What did the Oracle take from the Merovingian?

Can I say "guess what" to acknowledge new information?

How to verify router firmware is legit?

How to compare the signature of two functions?

What is the point of teaching Coding and robotics to kids as young as 6 years old?

Is there a spell, magical item, or any other method to accurately calculate how long ago an object/construct was created?

Give a grammar for a language on Σ=a,b,c that accepts all strings containing exactly one a

What are the ways my non-monk character can improve their unarmed damage?

How strong is XOR encryption of 256 bit plain text with 256 bit key?

Is the Wilcoxon rank-sum test a nonparametric alternative to the two sample t-test? Null hypotheses are different

For articles with more than 7 authors, is it compulsory to shorten it or just suggested?

Could a chess engine do retro analysis?

Name for geostationary orbit around another planet

How do you say "to play Devil's advocate" in German?

Should high school teachers say “real numbers” before teaching complex numbers?

Why does General Grievous say “Ah yes, the negotiator?”

What are pros and cons around banning castling?

Why only sine waves?

Why is the sample variance of a Sample Average Approximation calculated in this way?

Fingering for Bach's Toccata in E-minor BWV914

why Pi is transcendental number if it will satisfy the algebraic equation as "n" tends to infinity?

How do I set a custom order for folders on Windows 7 and 10?

Quickly filter file types or folders in Windows 7Diff two folders with different sub-directory structuresDefault sort order in Windows folderWindows Explorer - Treating cameras/Android file systems like disks and sort by dateHP logo disappears while booting Windows 10. Loading never finishes. How can I fix this?Is it possible to make Windows search results look like Windows explorer?How do I move a series of files to a parallel folder structure in windows 10

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

19

3

I have folders with these names:

• Introduction


• Theoretical Background


• Methods


• Results


• Conclusion

and would like to keep this sequence.

Unfortunately, Windows 7 doesn't let me and orders the folders according to their names or alteration date.

How can I fix the sequence of folders in Windows 7 and 10 according to my requirements?

Is it maybe possible to set an additional folder attribute like "1" or "2" and let Windows sort according to this attribute?

windows-7 windows windows-10

share|improve this question

edited Sep 21 at 0:47

RonJohn

16566 bronze badges

asked Sep 18 at 13:28

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You want to observe this sequence in what context? In Explorer? Something else? Directory order is ultimately a property of display, not of the filesystem (though one can leverage various properties at the filesystem layer to manifest various orderings)
  
  – Lightness Races with Monica
  Sep 20 at 13:21
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would like to oberserve this sequence in the file explorer.
  
  – Daniel
  Sep 20 at 23:21
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

19

3

I have folders with these names:

• Introduction


• Theoretical Background


• Methods


• Results


• Conclusion

and would like to keep this sequence.

Unfortunately, Windows 7 doesn't let me and orders the folders according to their names or alteration date.

How can I fix the sequence of folders in Windows 7 and 10 according to my requirements?

Is it maybe possible to set an additional folder attribute like "1" or "2" and let Windows sort according to this attribute?

windows-7 windows windows-10

share|improve this question

edited Sep 21 at 0:47

RonJohn

16566 bronze badges

asked Sep 18 at 13:28

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  You want to observe this sequence in what context? In Explorer? Something else? Directory order is ultimately a property of display, not of the filesystem (though one can leverage various properties at the filesystem layer to manifest various orderings)
  
  – Lightness Races with Monica
  Sep 20 at 13:21
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would like to oberserve this sequence in the file explorer.
  
  – Daniel
  Sep 20 at 23:21
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

I have folders with these names:

• Introduction


• Theoretical Background


• Methods


• Results


• Conclusion

and would like to keep this sequence.

Unfortunately, Windows 7 doesn't let me and orders the folders according to their names or alteration date.

How can I fix the sequence of folders in Windows 7 and 10 according to my requirements?

Is it maybe possible to set an additional folder attribute like "1" or "2" and let Windows sort according to this attribute?

windows-7 windows windows-10

share|improve this question

edited Sep 21 at 0:47

RonJohn

16566 bronze badges

asked Sep 18 at 13:28

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

share|improve this question

edited Sep 21 at 0:47

RonJohn

16566 bronze badges

asked Sep 18 at 13:28

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

share|improve this question

edited Sep 21 at 0:47

RonJohn

16566 bronze badges

asked Sep 18 at 13:28

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

edited Sep 21 at 0:47

RonJohn

16566 bronze badges

edited Sep 21 at 0:47

RonJohn

16566 bronze badges

asked Sep 18 at 13:28

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

asked Sep 18 at 13:28

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

6 Answers
6

active

oldest

votes

49

I generally do this by simply prefixing the folders with either letters or numbers, as though they were sections of a document:

1 - Introduction
2 - Theoretical Background
3 - Methods
4 - Results
5 - Conclusions

If there are more than ten "sections", I will use a two-digit zero-padded prefix, e.g., 01, 02, 03, etc.; I've never been quite so deranged as to insist that I need this for a group of over about 15 folders. (Even if I did, I could probably manage to script the rename.)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 18 at 15:49

Jeff ZeitlinJeff Zeitlin

2,45977 silver badges2121 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Alphabetic chapter ordinals also work well (A,B,C).
  
  – Christopher Hostage
  Sep 18 at 15:57
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think even Windows 7 is smart enough to sort 2 before 10. Zero-prefixing is not necessary in that case.
  
  – MSalters
  Sep 19 at 13:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Upvoted. Although it tweaks the question a bit, this solution is stable across different file systems, works with backups, and is even portable to other operating systems.
  
  – Dubu
  Sep 19 at 13:01
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @MSalters - Yes, Windows is smart enough to do so, but occasionally I've gotten anomalous results where it doesn't sort numerics as numerics, so I zero-pad just to prevent that.
  
  – Jeff Zeitlin
  Sep 19 at 13:45
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  As for why you may see this vary, numeric sorting of this type is a feature of Explorer - only in Windows XP and later - and is optional, enabled by default. Other applications presenting file lists may choose their own sorting methods. "Open/Save File" dialogs utilizing the shell sort the same way, though.
  
  – Corrodias
  Sep 19 at 18:57
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

20

You can make the folders a system folder with a desktop.ini file.

Create a new text file within the folder, and set the content

[.ShellClassInfo]
InfoTip=1
[ViewState]
Mode=
Vid=
FolderType=Generic

Where InfoTip=1 sets the "tag" as "1", so you can sort numerically

Then rename the file to desktop.ini.

Then set the folder as a system folder using command prompt

attrib +s "Introduction"

Then in the root folder:

View → Choose Details → add "Comments"

And sort by Comments, now the folders will be sorted according to the "InfoTip" field in the ini file as long as the folder is marked as a system folder.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 20 at 21:07

MarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

answered Sep 19 at 0:39

Richie FrameRichie Frame

1,51588 silver badges1111 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Nice. Setting the read-only attribute on the folder also works. Quickest way to create desktop.ini & set the folder attributes is to assign a custom icon via the Properties dialog. Then edit the desktop.ini file it creates.
  
  – Keith Miller
  Sep 19 at 4:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 because you taught me something, but it looks too much of a hassle. I prefer the solution suggested by @JeffZeitlin.
  
  – dr01
  Sep 20 at 7:16
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @dr01 it actually is not too much hassle, you can just copy and edit the ini file, and you can attrib * to all contents of a directory in one go, a dozen directories take about a minute
  
  – Richie Frame
  Sep 20 at 14:20
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 because this answer doesn't alter paths. Answers based on renaming will break anything that expects (relies on) certain names/paths. If this happens, fixing may be a real hassle; and if you ever need to change the order then you may need to fix again. In these circumstances this answer may lead to less hassle in total.
  
  – Kamil Maciorowski
  Sep 21 at 9:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This solution, while interesting and useful, assumes and requires that 'show hidden and system files and folders' be set, which may not be considered desirable.
  
  – Jeff Zeitlin
  Sep 25 at 11:10
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

20

Update per comments: doesn't have to be a minute apart, only creation order matters.

If you create them at least a minute apart in the order you want, you can then sort by Date Created.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 21 at 0:27

answered Sep 18 at 14:14

Keith MillerKeith Miller

1,28022 silver badges77 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I like that. Nice workaround.
  
  – Mr Ethernet
  Sep 18 at 14:20
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  8
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The drawbacks with this method (other than waiting a minute between creating each folder) are that Date created isn't shown by default, and it would be very difficult to insert an additional folder between two existing ones. I'd go with Jeff's suggestion of numbering the folders. If you need them without numbers, copy to new folders (in order, a minute apart) at the very end (renaming doesn't seem to change either the modified- or created- times).
  
  – TripeHound
  Sep 18 at 15:26
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  If you copy a folder structure, it will not preserve the creation date.
  
  – Boann
  Sep 19 at 2:51
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "Minute apart" does not matter. Actual creation time in the for system is precise to the second regardless of what you see in explorer.
  
  – n0rd
  Sep 19 at 14:19
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @n0rd: When I was testing for my response, it seemed like it mattered, even though I thought it shouldn't, knowing the nature of the value. But it seemed like it matttered at the time. I test now & indeed, as one would expect, the comparison uses the intermal precision, not display percision.
  
  – Keith Miller
  Sep 21 at 0:22
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

1

A variation on Jeff's answer (also interferes little with default Windows behavior and is quickly accomplished): add 4,3,2,1 and 0 spaces in front of the directory names:

 Introduction
 Theoretical Background
 Methods
 Results
Conclusions

A matter of taste ;-)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 20 at 13:57

Jan DoggenJan Doggen

3,54366 gold badges2828 silver badges4545 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Explorer in Windows 8 deletes leading/trailing whitespace, and I'm pretty sure Windows 7 and 10 do to.
  
  – wjandrea
  Sep 20 at 20:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @wjandrea Indeed (tested Win10). I never work from Explorer (always Total Commander) so I did not notice.
  
  – Jan Doggen
  Sep 20 at 21:43
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

0

One thing is a real (physical) order of files / directories, the other is their logical order (sorted by name, by extension, ...) shown in File Managers.

Use such a file manager (instead of Widnows Explorer) who is able to show files in their physical order (i.e. unsorted). For example Total Commander:

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 18 at 15:56

MarianDMarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  10
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There is no guarantee that the physical order will be the order that the user wants. This also requires installing third-party software, which may or may not be an option for the querent.
  
  – Jeff Zeitlin
  Sep 18 at 16:40
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  That is file-system dependent, and won't work on NTFS for example, see e.g. this.
  
  – dxiv
  Sep 19 at 20:38
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @dxiv, interesting. Thanks!
  
  – MarianD
  Sep 19 at 21:33
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Some file managers, like Directory Opus, can do manual sorting and saves the order.
  
  – Tom A. Vibeto
  Sep 20 at 7:42
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

0

First of all, thank you so much for your responses to my question!

I presented them to my colleagues and now half of them are using Jeff's and the other half Richie's solution.

Jeff's solution is, as pointed out by @Dubu, stable across different file systems, works with backups and is portable to other operating systems. Moreover, the solution is fast and easy to accomblish for everyone.

Now, let's assume you are using LaTeX for writing your thesis, then you will use similiar lines of code to insert your sections:

input./03_Section_A/Section_A.tex
input./04_Section_B/Section_B.tex

Let's also assume that you make the decision to add a new section, which should come between two existing sections (here between 03 and 04). Which changes are needed to add the new section in the sequence of folders?
Using Jeff's solution, you need to rename all existing folders and adjust all paths in your LaTeX file accordingly:

input./03_Section_A/Section_A.tex
input./04_NewSection/NewSection.tex
input./05_Section_B/Section_B.tex

Here, Richie's solution comes in handy.
In fact, you do not need numbers in front of folder names anymore.
If you make the decision to add a new section, which should come between two existing sections, you just need to update the desktop.ini files.
Any adjustments in the LaTeX file, besides inserting the new section, is not needed.

input./SectionName_A/Section_A.tex
input./NewSection/NewSection.tex
input./SectionName_B/Section_B.tex

To sum up, it is a personal decision to use Jeff's or Richie's solution.
Both of them are great.

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 21 at 0:43

DanielDaniel

20711 silver badge66 bronze badges

add a comment
 | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1483846%2fhow-do-i-set-a-custom-order-for-folders-on-windows-7-and-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

49

I generally do this by simply prefixing the folders with either letters or numbers, as though they were sections of a document:

1 - Introduction
2 - Theoretical Background
3 - Methods
4 - Results
5 - Conclusions

If there are more than ten "sections", I will use a two-digit zero-padded prefix, e.g., 01, 02, 03, etc.; I've never been quite so deranged as to insist that I need this for a group of over about 15 folders. (Even if I did, I could probably manage to script the rename.)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 18 at 15:49

Jeff ZeitlinJeff Zeitlin

2,45977 silver badges2121 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Alphabetic chapter ordinals also work well (A,B,C).
  
  – Christopher Hostage
  Sep 18 at 15:57
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think even Windows 7 is smart enough to sort 2 before 10. Zero-prefixing is not necessary in that case.
  
  – MSalters
  Sep 19 at 13:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Upvoted. Although it tweaks the question a bit, this solution is stable across different file systems, works with backups, and is even portable to other operating systems.
  
  – Dubu
  Sep 19 at 13:01
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @MSalters - Yes, Windows is smart enough to do so, but occasionally I've gotten anomalous results where it doesn't sort numerics as numerics, so I zero-pad just to prevent that.
  
  – Jeff Zeitlin
  Sep 19 at 13:45
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  As for why you may see this vary, numeric sorting of this type is a feature of Explorer - only in Windows XP and later - and is optional, enabled by default. Other applications presenting file lists may choose their own sorting methods. "Open/Save File" dialogs utilizing the shell sort the same way, though.
  
  – Corrodias
  Sep 19 at 18:57
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

49

I generally do this by simply prefixing the folders with either letters or numbers, as though they were sections of a document:

1 - Introduction
2 - Theoretical Background
3 - Methods
4 - Results
5 - Conclusions

If there are more than ten "sections", I will use a two-digit zero-padded prefix, e.g., 01, 02, 03, etc.; I've never been quite so deranged as to insist that I need this for a group of over about 15 folders. (Even if I did, I could probably manage to script the rename.)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 18 at 15:49

Jeff ZeitlinJeff Zeitlin

2,45977 silver badges2121 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Alphabetic chapter ordinals also work well (A,B,C).
  
  – Christopher Hostage
  Sep 18 at 15:57
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think even Windows 7 is smart enough to sort 2 before 10. Zero-prefixing is not necessary in that case.
  
  – MSalters
  Sep 19 at 13:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Upvoted. Although it tweaks the question a bit, this solution is stable across different file systems, works with backups, and is even portable to other operating systems.
  
  – Dubu
  Sep 19 at 13:01
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @MSalters - Yes, Windows is smart enough to do so, but occasionally I've gotten anomalous results where it doesn't sort numerics as numerics, so I zero-pad just to prevent that.
  
  – Jeff Zeitlin
  Sep 19 at 13:45
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  As for why you may see this vary, numeric sorting of this type is a feature of Explorer - only in Windows XP and later - and is optional, enabled by default. Other applications presenting file lists may choose their own sorting methods. "Open/Save File" dialogs utilizing the shell sort the same way, though.
  
  – Corrodias
  Sep 19 at 18:57
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

I generally do this by simply prefixing the folders with either letters or numbers, as though they were sections of a document:

1 - Introduction
2 - Theoretical Background
3 - Methods
4 - Results
5 - Conclusions

If there are more than ten "sections", I will use a two-digit zero-padded prefix, e.g., 01, 02, 03, etc.; I've never been quite so deranged as to insist that I need this for a group of over about 15 folders. (Even if I did, I could probably manage to script the rename.)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 18 at 15:49

Jeff ZeitlinJeff Zeitlin

2,45977 silver badges2121 bronze badges

1 - Introduction
2 - Theoretical Background
3 - Methods
4 - Results
5 - Conclusions

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 18 at 15:49

Jeff ZeitlinJeff Zeitlin

2,45977 silver badges2121 bronze badges

answered Sep 18 at 15:49

Jeff ZeitlinJeff Zeitlin

2,45977 silver badges2121 bronze badges

answered Sep 18 at 15:49

Jeff ZeitlinJeff Zeitlin

2,45977 silver badges2121 bronze badges

20

You can make the folders a system folder with a desktop.ini file.

Create a new text file within the folder, and set the content

[.ShellClassInfo]
InfoTip=1
[ViewState]
Mode=
Vid=
FolderType=Generic

Where InfoTip=1 sets the "tag" as "1", so you can sort numerically

Then rename the file to desktop.ini.

Then set the folder as a system folder using command prompt

attrib +s "Introduction"

Then in the root folder:

View → Choose Details → add "Comments"

And sort by Comments, now the folders will be sorted according to the "InfoTip" field in the ini file as long as the folder is marked as a system folder.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 20 at 21:07

MarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

answered Sep 19 at 0:39

Richie FrameRichie Frame

1,51588 silver badges1111 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Nice. Setting the read-only attribute on the folder also works. Quickest way to create desktop.ini & set the folder attributes is to assign a custom icon via the Properties dialog. Then edit the desktop.ini file it creates.
  
  – Keith Miller
  Sep 19 at 4:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 because you taught me something, but it looks too much of a hassle. I prefer the solution suggested by @JeffZeitlin.
  
  – dr01
  Sep 20 at 7:16
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @dr01 it actually is not too much hassle, you can just copy and edit the ini file, and you can attrib * to all contents of a directory in one go, a dozen directories take about a minute
  
  – Richie Frame
  Sep 20 at 14:20
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 because this answer doesn't alter paths. Answers based on renaming will break anything that expects (relies on) certain names/paths. If this happens, fixing may be a real hassle; and if you ever need to change the order then you may need to fix again. In these circumstances this answer may lead to less hassle in total.
  
  – Kamil Maciorowski
  Sep 21 at 9:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This solution, while interesting and useful, assumes and requires that 'show hidden and system files and folders' be set, which may not be considered desirable.
  
  – Jeff Zeitlin
  Sep 25 at 11:10
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

20

You can make the folders a system folder with a desktop.ini file.

Create a new text file within the folder, and set the content

[.ShellClassInfo]
InfoTip=1
[ViewState]
Mode=
Vid=
FolderType=Generic

Where InfoTip=1 sets the "tag" as "1", so you can sort numerically

Then rename the file to desktop.ini.

Then set the folder as a system folder using command prompt

attrib +s "Introduction"

Then in the root folder:

View → Choose Details → add "Comments"

And sort by Comments, now the folders will be sorted according to the "InfoTip" field in the ini file as long as the folder is marked as a system folder.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 20 at 21:07

MarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

answered Sep 19 at 0:39

Richie FrameRichie Frame

1,51588 silver badges1111 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Nice. Setting the read-only attribute on the folder also works. Quickest way to create desktop.ini & set the folder attributes is to assign a custom icon via the Properties dialog. Then edit the desktop.ini file it creates.
  
  – Keith Miller
  Sep 19 at 4:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 because you taught me something, but it looks too much of a hassle. I prefer the solution suggested by @JeffZeitlin.
  
  – dr01
  Sep 20 at 7:16
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @dr01 it actually is not too much hassle, you can just copy and edit the ini file, and you can attrib * to all contents of a directory in one go, a dozen directories take about a minute
  
  – Richie Frame
  Sep 20 at 14:20
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 because this answer doesn't alter paths. Answers based on renaming will break anything that expects (relies on) certain names/paths. If this happens, fixing may be a real hassle; and if you ever need to change the order then you may need to fix again. In these circumstances this answer may lead to less hassle in total.
  
  – Kamil Maciorowski
  Sep 21 at 9:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This solution, while interesting and useful, assumes and requires that 'show hidden and system files and folders' be set, which may not be considered desirable.
  
  – Jeff Zeitlin
  Sep 25 at 11:10
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

You can make the folders a system folder with a desktop.ini file.

Create a new text file within the folder, and set the content

[.ShellClassInfo]
InfoTip=1
[ViewState]
Mode=
Vid=
FolderType=Generic

Where InfoTip=1 sets the "tag" as "1", so you can sort numerically

Then rename the file to desktop.ini.

Then set the folder as a system folder using command prompt

attrib +s "Introduction"

Then in the root folder:

View → Choose Details → add "Comments"

And sort by Comments, now the folders will be sorted according to the "InfoTip" field in the ini file as long as the folder is marked as a system folder.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 20 at 21:07

MarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

answered Sep 19 at 0:39

Richie FrameRichie Frame

1,51588 silver badges1111 bronze badges

[.ShellClassInfo]
InfoTip=1
[ViewState]
Mode=
Vid=
FolderType=Generic

attrib +s "Introduction"

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 20 at 21:07

MarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

answered Sep 19 at 0:39

Richie FrameRichie Frame

1,51588 silver badges1111 bronze badges

edited Sep 20 at 21:07

MarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

edited Sep 20 at 21:07

MarianD

2,53111 gold badge1111 silver badges2323 bronze badges

answered Sep 19 at 0:39

Richie FrameRichie Frame

1,51588 silver badges1111 bronze badges

answered Sep 19 at 0:39

Richie FrameRichie Frame

1,51588 silver badges1111 bronze badges

20

Update per comments: doesn't have to be a minute apart, only creation order matters.

If you create them at least a minute apart in the order you want, you can then sort by Date Created.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 21 at 0:27

answered Sep 18 at 14:14

Keith MillerKeith Miller

1,28022 silver badges77 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I like that. Nice workaround.
  
  – Mr Ethernet
  Sep 18 at 14:20
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  8
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The drawbacks with this method (other than waiting a minute between creating each folder) are that Date created isn't shown by default, and it would be very difficult to insert an additional folder between two existing ones. I'd go with Jeff's suggestion of numbering the folders. If you need them without numbers, copy to new folders (in order, a minute apart) at the very end (renaming doesn't seem to change either the modified- or created- times).
  
  – TripeHound
  Sep 18 at 15:26
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  If you copy a folder structure, it will not preserve the creation date.
  
  – Boann
  Sep 19 at 2:51
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "Minute apart" does not matter. Actual creation time in the for system is precise to the second regardless of what you see in explorer.
  
  – n0rd
  Sep 19 at 14:19
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @n0rd: When I was testing for my response, it seemed like it mattered, even though I thought it shouldn't, knowing the nature of the value. But it seemed like it matttered at the time. I test now & indeed, as one would expect, the comparison uses the intermal precision, not display percision.
  
  – Keith Miller
  Sep 21 at 0:22
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

20

Update per comments: doesn't have to be a minute apart, only creation order matters.

If you create them at least a minute apart in the order you want, you can then sort by Date Created.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 21 at 0:27

answered Sep 18 at 14:14

Keith MillerKeith Miller

1,28022 silver badges77 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I like that. Nice workaround.
  
  – Mr Ethernet
  Sep 18 at 14:20
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  8
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The drawbacks with this method (other than waiting a minute between creating each folder) are that Date created isn't shown by default, and it would be very difficult to insert an additional folder between two existing ones. I'd go with Jeff's suggestion of numbering the folders. If you need them without numbers, copy to new folders (in order, a minute apart) at the very end (renaming doesn't seem to change either the modified- or created- times).
  
  – TripeHound
  Sep 18 at 15:26
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  If you copy a folder structure, it will not preserve the creation date.
  
  – Boann
  Sep 19 at 2:51
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  "Minute apart" does not matter. Actual creation time in the for system is precise to the second regardless of what you see in explorer.
  
  – n0rd
  Sep 19 at 14:19
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @n0rd: When I was testing for my response, it seemed like it mattered, even though I thought it shouldn't, knowing the nature of the value. But it seemed like it matttered at the time. I test now & indeed, as one would expect, the comparison uses the intermal precision, not display percision.
  
  – Keith Miller
  Sep 21 at 0:22
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

Update per comments: doesn't have to be a minute apart, only creation order matters.

If you create them at least a minute apart in the order you want, you can then sort by Date Created.

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 21 at 0:27

answered Sep 18 at 14:14

Keith MillerKeith Miller

1,28022 silver badges77 bronze badges

share|improve this answer

edited Sep 21 at 0:27

answered Sep 18 at 14:14

Keith MillerKeith Miller

1,28022 silver badges77 bronze badges

answered Sep 18 at 14:14

Keith MillerKeith Miller

1,28022 silver badges77 bronze badges

answered Sep 18 at 14:14

Keith MillerKeith Miller

1,28022 silver badges77 bronze badges

1

A variation on Jeff's answer (also interferes little with default Windows behavior and is quickly accomplished): add 4,3,2,1 and 0 spaces in front of the directory names:

 Introduction
 Theoretical Background
 Methods
 Results
Conclusions

A matter of taste ;-)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 20 at 13:57

Jan DoggenJan Doggen

3,54366 gold badges2828 silver badges4545 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Explorer in Windows 8 deletes leading/trailing whitespace, and I'm pretty sure Windows 7 and 10 do to.
  
  – wjandrea
  Sep 20 at 20:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @wjandrea Indeed (tested Win10). I never work from Explorer (always Total Commander) so I did not notice.
  
  – Jan Doggen
  Sep 20 at 21:43
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

1

A variation on Jeff's answer (also interferes little with default Windows behavior and is quickly accomplished): add 4,3,2,1 and 0 spaces in front of the directory names:

 Introduction
 Theoretical Background
 Methods
 Results
Conclusions

A matter of taste ;-)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 20 at 13:57

Jan DoggenJan Doggen

3,54366 gold badges2828 silver badges4545 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Explorer in Windows 8 deletes leading/trailing whitespace, and I'm pretty sure Windows 7 and 10 do to.
  
  – wjandrea
  Sep 20 at 20:50
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @wjandrea Indeed (tested Win10). I never work from Explorer (always Total Commander) so I did not notice.
  
  – Jan Doggen
  Sep 20 at 21:43
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment
 | 

A variation on Jeff's answer (also interferes little with default Windows behavior and is quickly accomplished): add 4,3,2,1 and 0 spaces in front of the directory names:

 Introduction
 Theoretical Background
 Methods
 Results
Conclusions

A matter of taste ;-)

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 20 at 13:57

Jan DoggenJan Doggen

3,54366 gold badges2828 silver badges4545 bronze badges

 Introduction
 Theoretical Background
 Methods
 Results
Conclusions

share|improve this answer

answered Sep 20 at 13:57

Jan DoggenJan Doggen

3,54366 gold badges2828 silver badges4545 bronze badges

answered Sep 20 at 13:57

Jan DoggenJan Doggen

3,54366 gold badges2828 silver badges4545 bronze badges