Is there a neutral term for people who tend to avoid face-to-face or video/audio communication?Defining shyness towards strangers in confrontational situationsWhat effects does spending a lot of time in online communities have on interpersonal skills?Why do we anchor our happiness to short term situational comparisons rather than large scale events?What's the term for people who deny others' achievements?Is there a name for highly aggressive non-violent people?Do unschooled persons think differently from us (schooled persons)? How?A formal term for overcoming something, or getting over somethingPrecise term for a sort of social pressure

Can the Protection fighting style be used in this way?

How to exit read-only mode

Why are there so many binary systems?

Login system created with Python

Should I tell an editor that I believe an article I'm reviewing is not good enough for the journal?

Idiomatic way to distinguish two zero-arg constructors

How can I add an ammeter and/or voltmeter to my home breaker panel?

How to write a vertically centered asterisk in LaTex in a normal text?

How can I simplify this sum any further?

Are there any dishes that can only be cooked with a microwave?

What does the Node2D transform property do?

How should I handle a player attacking from the top of a tree?

SSH host identification changes on one wireless network

Bash script that shows changing real time values from commands

Was it possible for a message from Paris to reach London within 48 hours in 1782?

Would an intelligent alien civilisation categorise EM radiation the same as us?

San Francisco To Hyderabad via Hong Kong with 15 hours layover, Do I need to to submit a Pre-arrival Registration for hotel stay in HKG transit area?

RPMs too high on freeway? Help!

Can I use pavers as a cheap solution to stop rain water erosion?

Are we sinners because we sin or do we sin because we are sinners?

How to explain to traditional people why they should upgrade their old Windows XP device?

UK visitors visa needed fast for badly injured family member

Contradictory parts of D&D Beyond: which is official?

Beginner Tactics - Why Isn't This Mate?



Is there a neutral term for people who tend to avoid face-to-face or video/audio communication?


Defining shyness towards strangers in confrontational situationsWhat effects does spending a lot of time in online communities have on interpersonal skills?Why do we anchor our happiness to short term situational comparisons rather than large scale events?What's the term for people who deny others' achievements?Is there a name for highly aggressive non-violent people?Do unschooled persons think differently from us (schooled persons)? How?A formal term for overcoming something, or getting over somethingPrecise term for a sort of social pressure






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








9















$begingroup$


Imagine a person who:



  • Mostly prefers written communication (email, instant messaging) to making phone/video calls or seeing face-to-face

  • Hardly ever watches videos on the internet. Prefers reading

  • At college/uni, instead of attending lectures/seminars, would successfully study things on their own using the recommended materials, and would always pass the exams

  • Would rather sort things out themselves instead of asking for help/directions

  • Are great at working from home

  • Generally does not socialise and are very happy to stay on their own / keep to themselves

  • Avoids living in cities and prefers rural low-to-zero populated areas

  • Does not hate people but just finds most of them rather boring or being nuisance

  • Despite all the above, are very positive and friendly when communicating face-to-face and are very valued within their professional circle

I have been trying to find a term to describe such a person but so far all terms that I found seem to bear a negative connotation or identify a disorder. There is no negativity or disorder here as the person does not feel stress or disability and are very happy with what they are.



Examples of terms that are close but do not match for reasons explained:




  • Autism spectrum and Asperger syndrome are both defined as "disorders" with "difficulties". The person does not have any difficulties: they do appear socialising and communicating just fine — when they need it for some purpose other than socialising/communicating itself;


  • Misanthrope actually hates people (which makes the term regarded as rather negative). The subject person does not. They simply avoid seeing people unnecessarily;


  • Recluse is a very close call, but it describes a person who does live that way without conveying anything of whether they want to live that way. A very social party goer may hide away and be a recluse if a gang is after them. Conversely, the subject person who, despite their preference, lives in a big city and participates in social drinks at work just because it secures their career cannot be called "recluse";


  • Loner is another good word but it is not sufficiently neutral. As the linked article says, "the modern term "loner" can be used with a negative connotation in the belief that human beings are social creatures and those that do not participate are deviant."









share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Psychology.SE. As you are looking for a definition which is nothing to do with psychological or neurological disorders, I think this question would be more suited to English Language Learners or English Language Usage. I would also suggest giving examples of words you think don't fit your criteria and why. How do they bear a negative connotation?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Rogers
    Sep 5 at 5:29







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisRogers the definition I am after may not have anything to do with disorders but it certainly has a lot to do with psychological or neurological considerations. Say why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    "Reserved" could be the word you are looking for?
    $endgroup$
    – Tony
    Sep 5 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    I think some of the traits you are asking about may not necessarily be as linked as it may seem, for example many people prefer low-population areas but like face-to-face conversation, especially with people close to them rather than strangers. As far as "why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?" - this topic is usually addressed in educational literature in terms of learning styles and also need not necessarily fit with all the other traits you describe. It sounds like you are describing a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02











  • $begingroup$
    See also psychology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2374/…
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02

















9















$begingroup$


Imagine a person who:



  • Mostly prefers written communication (email, instant messaging) to making phone/video calls or seeing face-to-face

  • Hardly ever watches videos on the internet. Prefers reading

  • At college/uni, instead of attending lectures/seminars, would successfully study things on their own using the recommended materials, and would always pass the exams

  • Would rather sort things out themselves instead of asking for help/directions

  • Are great at working from home

  • Generally does not socialise and are very happy to stay on their own / keep to themselves

  • Avoids living in cities and prefers rural low-to-zero populated areas

  • Does not hate people but just finds most of them rather boring or being nuisance

  • Despite all the above, are very positive and friendly when communicating face-to-face and are very valued within their professional circle

I have been trying to find a term to describe such a person but so far all terms that I found seem to bear a negative connotation or identify a disorder. There is no negativity or disorder here as the person does not feel stress or disability and are very happy with what they are.



Examples of terms that are close but do not match for reasons explained:




  • Autism spectrum and Asperger syndrome are both defined as "disorders" with "difficulties". The person does not have any difficulties: they do appear socialising and communicating just fine — when they need it for some purpose other than socialising/communicating itself;


  • Misanthrope actually hates people (which makes the term regarded as rather negative). The subject person does not. They simply avoid seeing people unnecessarily;


  • Recluse is a very close call, but it describes a person who does live that way without conveying anything of whether they want to live that way. A very social party goer may hide away and be a recluse if a gang is after them. Conversely, the subject person who, despite their preference, lives in a big city and participates in social drinks at work just because it secures their career cannot be called "recluse";


  • Loner is another good word but it is not sufficiently neutral. As the linked article says, "the modern term "loner" can be used with a negative connotation in the belief that human beings are social creatures and those that do not participate are deviant."









share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Psychology.SE. As you are looking for a definition which is nothing to do with psychological or neurological disorders, I think this question would be more suited to English Language Learners or English Language Usage. I would also suggest giving examples of words you think don't fit your criteria and why. How do they bear a negative connotation?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Rogers
    Sep 5 at 5:29







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisRogers the definition I am after may not have anything to do with disorders but it certainly has a lot to do with psychological or neurological considerations. Say why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    "Reserved" could be the word you are looking for?
    $endgroup$
    – Tony
    Sep 5 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    I think some of the traits you are asking about may not necessarily be as linked as it may seem, for example many people prefer low-population areas but like face-to-face conversation, especially with people close to them rather than strangers. As far as "why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?" - this topic is usually addressed in educational literature in terms of learning styles and also need not necessarily fit with all the other traits you describe. It sounds like you are describing a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02











  • $begingroup$
    See also psychology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2374/…
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02













9













9









9


3



$begingroup$


Imagine a person who:



  • Mostly prefers written communication (email, instant messaging) to making phone/video calls or seeing face-to-face

  • Hardly ever watches videos on the internet. Prefers reading

  • At college/uni, instead of attending lectures/seminars, would successfully study things on their own using the recommended materials, and would always pass the exams

  • Would rather sort things out themselves instead of asking for help/directions

  • Are great at working from home

  • Generally does not socialise and are very happy to stay on their own / keep to themselves

  • Avoids living in cities and prefers rural low-to-zero populated areas

  • Does not hate people but just finds most of them rather boring or being nuisance

  • Despite all the above, are very positive and friendly when communicating face-to-face and are very valued within their professional circle

I have been trying to find a term to describe such a person but so far all terms that I found seem to bear a negative connotation or identify a disorder. There is no negativity or disorder here as the person does not feel stress or disability and are very happy with what they are.



Examples of terms that are close but do not match for reasons explained:




  • Autism spectrum and Asperger syndrome are both defined as "disorders" with "difficulties". The person does not have any difficulties: they do appear socialising and communicating just fine — when they need it for some purpose other than socialising/communicating itself;


  • Misanthrope actually hates people (which makes the term regarded as rather negative). The subject person does not. They simply avoid seeing people unnecessarily;


  • Recluse is a very close call, but it describes a person who does live that way without conveying anything of whether they want to live that way. A very social party goer may hide away and be a recluse if a gang is after them. Conversely, the subject person who, despite their preference, lives in a big city and participates in social drinks at work just because it secures their career cannot be called "recluse";


  • Loner is another good word but it is not sufficiently neutral. As the linked article says, "the modern term "loner" can be used with a negative connotation in the belief that human beings are social creatures and those that do not participate are deviant."









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Imagine a person who:



  • Mostly prefers written communication (email, instant messaging) to making phone/video calls or seeing face-to-face

  • Hardly ever watches videos on the internet. Prefers reading

  • At college/uni, instead of attending lectures/seminars, would successfully study things on their own using the recommended materials, and would always pass the exams

  • Would rather sort things out themselves instead of asking for help/directions

  • Are great at working from home

  • Generally does not socialise and are very happy to stay on their own / keep to themselves

  • Avoids living in cities and prefers rural low-to-zero populated areas

  • Does not hate people but just finds most of them rather boring or being nuisance

  • Despite all the above, are very positive and friendly when communicating face-to-face and are very valued within their professional circle

I have been trying to find a term to describe such a person but so far all terms that I found seem to bear a negative connotation or identify a disorder. There is no negativity or disorder here as the person does not feel stress or disability and are very happy with what they are.



Examples of terms that are close but do not match for reasons explained:




  • Autism spectrum and Asperger syndrome are both defined as "disorders" with "difficulties". The person does not have any difficulties: they do appear socialising and communicating just fine — when they need it for some purpose other than socialising/communicating itself;


  • Misanthrope actually hates people (which makes the term regarded as rather negative). The subject person does not. They simply avoid seeing people unnecessarily;


  • Recluse is a very close call, but it describes a person who does live that way without conveying anything of whether they want to live that way. A very social party goer may hide away and be a recluse if a gang is after them. Conversely, the subject person who, despite their preference, lives in a big city and participates in social drinks at work just because it secures their career cannot be called "recluse";


  • Loner is another good word but it is not sufficiently neutral. As the linked article says, "the modern term "loner" can be used with a negative connotation in the belief that human beings are social creatures and those that do not participate are deviant."






social-psychology terminology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 5 at 7:30







Greendrake

















asked Sep 5 at 1:29









GreendrakeGreendrake

2111 silver badge5 bronze badges




2111 silver badge5 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Psychology.SE. As you are looking for a definition which is nothing to do with psychological or neurological disorders, I think this question would be more suited to English Language Learners or English Language Usage. I would also suggest giving examples of words you think don't fit your criteria and why. How do they bear a negative connotation?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Rogers
    Sep 5 at 5:29







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisRogers the definition I am after may not have anything to do with disorders but it certainly has a lot to do with psychological or neurological considerations. Say why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    "Reserved" could be the word you are looking for?
    $endgroup$
    – Tony
    Sep 5 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    I think some of the traits you are asking about may not necessarily be as linked as it may seem, for example many people prefer low-population areas but like face-to-face conversation, especially with people close to them rather than strangers. As far as "why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?" - this topic is usually addressed in educational literature in terms of learning styles and also need not necessarily fit with all the other traits you describe. It sounds like you are describing a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02











  • $begingroup$
    See also psychology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2374/…
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Psychology.SE. As you are looking for a definition which is nothing to do with psychological or neurological disorders, I think this question would be more suited to English Language Learners or English Language Usage. I would also suggest giving examples of words you think don't fit your criteria and why. How do they bear a negative connotation?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Rogers
    Sep 5 at 5:29







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisRogers the definition I am after may not have anything to do with disorders but it certainly has a lot to do with psychological or neurological considerations. Say why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    "Reserved" could be the word you are looking for?
    $endgroup$
    – Tony
    Sep 5 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    I think some of the traits you are asking about may not necessarily be as linked as it may seem, for example many people prefer low-population areas but like face-to-face conversation, especially with people close to them rather than strangers. As far as "why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?" - this topic is usually addressed in educational literature in terms of learning styles and also need not necessarily fit with all the other traits you describe. It sounds like you are describing a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02











  • $begingroup$
    See also psychology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2374/…
    $endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Sep 5 at 22:02







1




1




$begingroup$
Welcome to Psychology.SE. As you are looking for a definition which is nothing to do with psychological or neurological disorders, I think this question would be more suited to English Language Learners or English Language Usage. I would also suggest giving examples of words you think don't fit your criteria and why. How do they bear a negative connotation?
$endgroup$
– Chris Rogers
Sep 5 at 5:29





$begingroup$
Welcome to Psychology.SE. As you are looking for a definition which is nothing to do with psychological or neurological disorders, I think this question would be more suited to English Language Learners or English Language Usage. I would also suggest giving examples of words you think don't fit your criteria and why. How do they bear a negative connotation?
$endgroup$
– Chris Rogers
Sep 5 at 5:29





1




1




$begingroup$
@ChrisRogers the definition I am after may not have anything to do with disorders but it certainly has a lot to do with psychological or neurological considerations. Say why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?
$endgroup$
– Greendrake
Sep 5 at 7:43




$begingroup$
@ChrisRogers the definition I am after may not have anything to do with disorders but it certainly has a lot to do with psychological or neurological considerations. Say why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?
$endgroup$
– Greendrake
Sep 5 at 7:43












$begingroup$
"Reserved" could be the word you are looking for?
$endgroup$
– Tony
Sep 5 at 14:32




$begingroup$
"Reserved" could be the word you are looking for?
$endgroup$
– Tony
Sep 5 at 14:32












$begingroup$
I think some of the traits you are asking about may not necessarily be as linked as it may seem, for example many people prefer low-population areas but like face-to-face conversation, especially with people close to them rather than strangers. As far as "why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?" - this topic is usually addressed in educational literature in terms of learning styles and also need not necessarily fit with all the other traits you describe. It sounds like you are describing a person.
$endgroup$
– Bryan Krause
Sep 5 at 22:02





$begingroup$
I think some of the traits you are asking about may not necessarily be as linked as it may seem, for example many people prefer low-population areas but like face-to-face conversation, especially with people close to them rather than strangers. As far as "why does the subject person find uni lectures boring and studies more efficiently on books?" - this topic is usually addressed in educational literature in terms of learning styles and also need not necessarily fit with all the other traits you describe. It sounds like you are describing a person.
$endgroup$
– Bryan Krause
Sep 5 at 22:02













$begingroup$
See also psychology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2374/…
$endgroup$
– Bryan Krause
Sep 5 at 22:02




$begingroup$
See also psychology.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2374/…
$endgroup$
– Bryan Krause
Sep 5 at 22:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7

















$begingroup$

I agree with @AlwaysConfused that this sounds very like someone with Asperger's.



However, if you want a more "neutral" term, would Introvert help?



Such a person - an Ixxx on the Myers-Briggs scale - typically finds their "energy levels" drain when in groups of people, and recharge when they are on their own.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Whenever I study about ASD, Narcissism and Introversion i can quite easily distinguish the 3 as very much different conditions though they may co-occur at a combination and also may superficially look the same but the conditions are basically very different.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that the OP denies any affect over everyday functioning, I think introversion is pretty close, and MBTI types that include introversion such as INTJ or INFJ or INTP or INFP is very close match.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:45


















4

















$begingroup$

The description strongly matches with Autism, Autism spectrum disorder and Asperger syndrome.



See also:



  1. Asperger syndrome


  2. Autism spectrum condition


  3. Autism


Classically, Asperger syndrome was characterised by no obvious delay in language development, and in some cases Aspergers tend to have a very vast vocabulary.



I did not understand what is meant by a neutral term.



Autism is not a bad word at all. Many autistics consider autism as their identity, or the right term to explain who are they and what does the typically developing people require to know about them.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks but those are all "disorders" with "difficulties". The subject person does not have any difficulties with what they are.
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:23







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake I believe that is addressed in the update? In addition, no such diagnosis would be given unless the symptoms (and others you do not describe) inhibit 'normal' everyday functioning (thus, it becoming a disorder). You are likely to find autistic traits in everyone. I agree with Chris you might perhaps be more interested in English Language Use SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 7:57







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StevenJeuris the point is that you don't label someone with a word that names a diagnosable condition, unless you have a diagnosis.
    $endgroup$
    – hobbs
    Sep 5 at 19:22






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @hobbs yes. Somewhat what I was implying, no?
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 20:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake There is one very important aspect regarding disorders: A disorder is some anomaly of a person that causes suffering. That means that part of the definition, there is suffering. It is not the anomaly in itself. That means that an aspect of a person that is different from normal is not in itself a disorder. Many things are that are described as disorders may be perceived as normal for some people, without causing any suffering whatsoever. In this case, it is clearly not a disorder! It is named disorder only because it becomes subject to medicine only in the cause it causes suffering
    $endgroup$
    – Volker Siegel
    Nov 8 at 11:11












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "391"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpsychology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24003%2fis-there-a-neutral-term-for-people-who-tend-to-avoid-face-to-face-or-video-audio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7

















$begingroup$

I agree with @AlwaysConfused that this sounds very like someone with Asperger's.



However, if you want a more "neutral" term, would Introvert help?



Such a person - an Ixxx on the Myers-Briggs scale - typically finds their "energy levels" drain when in groups of people, and recharge when they are on their own.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Whenever I study about ASD, Narcissism and Introversion i can quite easily distinguish the 3 as very much different conditions though they may co-occur at a combination and also may superficially look the same but the conditions are basically very different.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that the OP denies any affect over everyday functioning, I think introversion is pretty close, and MBTI types that include introversion such as INTJ or INFJ or INTP or INFP is very close match.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:45















7

















$begingroup$

I agree with @AlwaysConfused that this sounds very like someone with Asperger's.



However, if you want a more "neutral" term, would Introvert help?



Such a person - an Ixxx on the Myers-Briggs scale - typically finds their "energy levels" drain when in groups of people, and recharge when they are on their own.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Whenever I study about ASD, Narcissism and Introversion i can quite easily distinguish the 3 as very much different conditions though they may co-occur at a combination and also may superficially look the same but the conditions are basically very different.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that the OP denies any affect over everyday functioning, I think introversion is pretty close, and MBTI types that include introversion such as INTJ or INFJ or INTP or INFP is very close match.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:45













7















7











7







$begingroup$

I agree with @AlwaysConfused that this sounds very like someone with Asperger's.



However, if you want a more "neutral" term, would Introvert help?



Such a person - an Ixxx on the Myers-Briggs scale - typically finds their "energy levels" drain when in groups of people, and recharge when they are on their own.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



I agree with @AlwaysConfused that this sounds very like someone with Asperger's.



However, if you want a more "neutral" term, would Introvert help?



Such a person - an Ixxx on the Myers-Briggs scale - typically finds their "energy levels" drain when in groups of people, and recharge when they are on their own.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered Sep 5 at 9:53









user7761803user7761803

711 bronze badge




711 bronze badge














  • $begingroup$
    Whenever I study about ASD, Narcissism and Introversion i can quite easily distinguish the 3 as very much different conditions though they may co-occur at a combination and also may superficially look the same but the conditions are basically very different.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that the OP denies any affect over everyday functioning, I think introversion is pretty close, and MBTI types that include introversion such as INTJ or INFJ or INTP or INFP is very close match.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:45
















  • $begingroup$
    Whenever I study about ASD, Narcissism and Introversion i can quite easily distinguish the 3 as very much different conditions though they may co-occur at a combination and also may superficially look the same but the conditions are basically very different.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that the OP denies any affect over everyday functioning, I think introversion is pretty close, and MBTI types that include introversion such as INTJ or INFJ or INTP or INFP is very close match.
    $endgroup$
    – Always Confused
    Sep 7 at 17:45















$begingroup$
Whenever I study about ASD, Narcissism and Introversion i can quite easily distinguish the 3 as very much different conditions though they may co-occur at a combination and also may superficially look the same but the conditions are basically very different.
$endgroup$
– Always Confused
Sep 7 at 17:40




$begingroup$
Whenever I study about ASD, Narcissism and Introversion i can quite easily distinguish the 3 as very much different conditions though they may co-occur at a combination and also may superficially look the same but the conditions are basically very different.
$endgroup$
– Always Confused
Sep 7 at 17:40




1




1




$begingroup$
Given that the OP denies any affect over everyday functioning, I think introversion is pretty close, and MBTI types that include introversion such as INTJ or INFJ or INTP or INFP is very close match.
$endgroup$
– Always Confused
Sep 7 at 17:45




$begingroup$
Given that the OP denies any affect over everyday functioning, I think introversion is pretty close, and MBTI types that include introversion such as INTJ or INFJ or INTP or INFP is very close match.
$endgroup$
– Always Confused
Sep 7 at 17:45













4

















$begingroup$

The description strongly matches with Autism, Autism spectrum disorder and Asperger syndrome.



See also:



  1. Asperger syndrome


  2. Autism spectrum condition


  3. Autism


Classically, Asperger syndrome was characterised by no obvious delay in language development, and in some cases Aspergers tend to have a very vast vocabulary.



I did not understand what is meant by a neutral term.



Autism is not a bad word at all. Many autistics consider autism as their identity, or the right term to explain who are they and what does the typically developing people require to know about them.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks but those are all "disorders" with "difficulties". The subject person does not have any difficulties with what they are.
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:23







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake I believe that is addressed in the update? In addition, no such diagnosis would be given unless the symptoms (and others you do not describe) inhibit 'normal' everyday functioning (thus, it becoming a disorder). You are likely to find autistic traits in everyone. I agree with Chris you might perhaps be more interested in English Language Use SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 7:57







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StevenJeuris the point is that you don't label someone with a word that names a diagnosable condition, unless you have a diagnosis.
    $endgroup$
    – hobbs
    Sep 5 at 19:22






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @hobbs yes. Somewhat what I was implying, no?
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 20:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake There is one very important aspect regarding disorders: A disorder is some anomaly of a person that causes suffering. That means that part of the definition, there is suffering. It is not the anomaly in itself. That means that an aspect of a person that is different from normal is not in itself a disorder. Many things are that are described as disorders may be perceived as normal for some people, without causing any suffering whatsoever. In this case, it is clearly not a disorder! It is named disorder only because it becomes subject to medicine only in the cause it causes suffering
    $endgroup$
    – Volker Siegel
    Nov 8 at 11:11















4

















$begingroup$

The description strongly matches with Autism, Autism spectrum disorder and Asperger syndrome.



See also:



  1. Asperger syndrome


  2. Autism spectrum condition


  3. Autism


Classically, Asperger syndrome was characterised by no obvious delay in language development, and in some cases Aspergers tend to have a very vast vocabulary.



I did not understand what is meant by a neutral term.



Autism is not a bad word at all. Many autistics consider autism as their identity, or the right term to explain who are they and what does the typically developing people require to know about them.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks but those are all "disorders" with "difficulties". The subject person does not have any difficulties with what they are.
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:23







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake I believe that is addressed in the update? In addition, no such diagnosis would be given unless the symptoms (and others you do not describe) inhibit 'normal' everyday functioning (thus, it becoming a disorder). You are likely to find autistic traits in everyone. I agree with Chris you might perhaps be more interested in English Language Use SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 7:57







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StevenJeuris the point is that you don't label someone with a word that names a diagnosable condition, unless you have a diagnosis.
    $endgroup$
    – hobbs
    Sep 5 at 19:22






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @hobbs yes. Somewhat what I was implying, no?
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 20:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake There is one very important aspect regarding disorders: A disorder is some anomaly of a person that causes suffering. That means that part of the definition, there is suffering. It is not the anomaly in itself. That means that an aspect of a person that is different from normal is not in itself a disorder. Many things are that are described as disorders may be perceived as normal for some people, without causing any suffering whatsoever. In this case, it is clearly not a disorder! It is named disorder only because it becomes subject to medicine only in the cause it causes suffering
    $endgroup$
    – Volker Siegel
    Nov 8 at 11:11













4















4











4







$begingroup$

The description strongly matches with Autism, Autism spectrum disorder and Asperger syndrome.



See also:



  1. Asperger syndrome


  2. Autism spectrum condition


  3. Autism


Classically, Asperger syndrome was characterised by no obvious delay in language development, and in some cases Aspergers tend to have a very vast vocabulary.



I did not understand what is meant by a neutral term.



Autism is not a bad word at all. Many autistics consider autism as their identity, or the right term to explain who are they and what does the typically developing people require to know about them.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$



The description strongly matches with Autism, Autism spectrum disorder and Asperger syndrome.



See also:



  1. Asperger syndrome


  2. Autism spectrum condition


  3. Autism


Classically, Asperger syndrome was characterised by no obvious delay in language development, and in some cases Aspergers tend to have a very vast vocabulary.



I did not understand what is meant by a neutral term.



Autism is not a bad word at all. Many autistics consider autism as their identity, or the right term to explain who are they and what does the typically developing people require to know about them.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer








edited Sep 5 at 5:57

























answered Sep 5 at 5:51









Always ConfusedAlways Confused

3991 silver badge15 bronze badges




3991 silver badge15 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks but those are all "disorders" with "difficulties". The subject person does not have any difficulties with what they are.
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:23







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake I believe that is addressed in the update? In addition, no such diagnosis would be given unless the symptoms (and others you do not describe) inhibit 'normal' everyday functioning (thus, it becoming a disorder). You are likely to find autistic traits in everyone. I agree with Chris you might perhaps be more interested in English Language Use SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 7:57







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StevenJeuris the point is that you don't label someone with a word that names a diagnosable condition, unless you have a diagnosis.
    $endgroup$
    – hobbs
    Sep 5 at 19:22






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @hobbs yes. Somewhat what I was implying, no?
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 20:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake There is one very important aspect regarding disorders: A disorder is some anomaly of a person that causes suffering. That means that part of the definition, there is suffering. It is not the anomaly in itself. That means that an aspect of a person that is different from normal is not in itself a disorder. Many things are that are described as disorders may be perceived as normal for some people, without causing any suffering whatsoever. In this case, it is clearly not a disorder! It is named disorder only because it becomes subject to medicine only in the cause it causes suffering
    $endgroup$
    – Volker Siegel
    Nov 8 at 11:11












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks but those are all "disorders" with "difficulties". The subject person does not have any difficulties with what they are.
    $endgroup$
    – Greendrake
    Sep 5 at 7:23







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake I believe that is addressed in the update? In addition, no such diagnosis would be given unless the symptoms (and others you do not describe) inhibit 'normal' everyday functioning (thus, it becoming a disorder). You are likely to find autistic traits in everyone. I agree with Chris you might perhaps be more interested in English Language Use SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 7:57







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @StevenJeuris the point is that you don't label someone with a word that names a diagnosable condition, unless you have a diagnosis.
    $endgroup$
    – hobbs
    Sep 5 at 19:22






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @hobbs yes. Somewhat what I was implying, no?
    $endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris
    Sep 5 at 20:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Greendrake There is one very important aspect regarding disorders: A disorder is some anomaly of a person that causes suffering. That means that part of the definition, there is suffering. It is not the anomaly in itself. That means that an aspect of a person that is different from normal is not in itself a disorder. Many things are that are described as disorders may be perceived as normal for some people, without causing any suffering whatsoever. In this case, it is clearly not a disorder! It is named disorder only because it becomes subject to medicine only in the cause it causes suffering
    $endgroup$
    – Volker Siegel
    Nov 8 at 11:11







1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks but those are all "disorders" with "difficulties". The subject person does not have any difficulties with what they are.
$endgroup$
– Greendrake
Sep 5 at 7:23





$begingroup$
Thanks but those are all "disorders" with "difficulties". The subject person does not have any difficulties with what they are.
$endgroup$
– Greendrake
Sep 5 at 7:23





2




2




$begingroup$
@Greendrake I believe that is addressed in the update? In addition, no such diagnosis would be given unless the symptoms (and others you do not describe) inhibit 'normal' everyday functioning (thus, it becoming a disorder). You are likely to find autistic traits in everyone. I agree with Chris you might perhaps be more interested in English Language Use SE.
$endgroup$
– Steven Jeuris
Sep 5 at 7:57





$begingroup$
@Greendrake I believe that is addressed in the update? In addition, no such diagnosis would be given unless the symptoms (and others you do not describe) inhibit 'normal' everyday functioning (thus, it becoming a disorder). You are likely to find autistic traits in everyone. I agree with Chris you might perhaps be more interested in English Language Use SE.
$endgroup$
– Steven Jeuris
Sep 5 at 7:57





4




4




$begingroup$
@StevenJeuris the point is that you don't label someone with a word that names a diagnosable condition, unless you have a diagnosis.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Sep 5 at 19:22




$begingroup$
@StevenJeuris the point is that you don't label someone with a word that names a diagnosable condition, unless you have a diagnosis.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
Sep 5 at 19:22




2




2




$begingroup$
@hobbs yes. Somewhat what I was implying, no?
$endgroup$
– Steven Jeuris
Sep 5 at 20:39




$begingroup$
@hobbs yes. Somewhat what I was implying, no?
$endgroup$
– Steven Jeuris
Sep 5 at 20:39




1




1




$begingroup$
@Greendrake There is one very important aspect regarding disorders: A disorder is some anomaly of a person that causes suffering. That means that part of the definition, there is suffering. It is not the anomaly in itself. That means that an aspect of a person that is different from normal is not in itself a disorder. Many things are that are described as disorders may be perceived as normal for some people, without causing any suffering whatsoever. In this case, it is clearly not a disorder! It is named disorder only because it becomes subject to medicine only in the cause it causes suffering
$endgroup$
– Volker Siegel
Nov 8 at 11:11




$begingroup$
@Greendrake There is one very important aspect regarding disorders: A disorder is some anomaly of a person that causes suffering. That means that part of the definition, there is suffering. It is not the anomaly in itself. That means that an aspect of a person that is different from normal is not in itself a disorder. Many things are that are described as disorders may be perceived as normal for some people, without causing any suffering whatsoever. In this case, it is clearly not a disorder! It is named disorder only because it becomes subject to medicine only in the cause it causes suffering
$endgroup$
– Volker Siegel
Nov 8 at 11:11


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Psychology & Neuroscience Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpsychology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24003%2fis-there-a-neutral-term-for-people-who-tend-to-avoid-face-to-face-or-video-audio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?