is this F 6'9 chord a figured bass or a chord extension?Correct terminology for chord inversionsLilypond chord mode not rendering minor modifier in alternate chordModern convention for writing raised sixth in figured bass?English name for 3-tone chords that have the bass tone different from the rootHow does this drop 3 voicing work?Can we use double accidentals in figured bass?Do accidentals in a figured bass last the full measure, or do they only apply to that single chord?Figured bass and tiesHow to realize a figured bassNon-cadential use of 6/4 chord

On the method described by Purcell for finding the magnetic field by measuring the force on a test particle

Series expansion of a function defined through an integral

Does the coriolis force have an effect on the direction in which an aircraft travels?

How would third party app generate access token with just Consumer Key and Consumer Secret?

How can mages regard fast magic as a form of evil?

Chaining statistics in a dice queue

Why does Rome municipality seem to have a hard time maintaining the city?

Why does Greedo say "Maclunkey" in the Mos Eisley Cantina?

Is there a heavy usage of the word "bonfire" in English?

A robot surviving on top of a 3x3 platform

Regular Expression with at least one a, even number of b

Can a microwave oven cook chicken?

Sort and Table a Sentence by Word Lengths

Is there a text editor that can run shell scripts?

Doubt about Taylor series: do successive derivatives on a point determine the whole function?

Raised concerns about a security vulnerability to various managers, for more than a year, with no results. Should I mention it to external auditors?

Are we sinners because we sin or do we sin because we are sinners?

What is the "two-drive trick" that can read Amiga disks on a PC?

Grid Puzzle - Paint

Were any DOS games (or software) known to use VBE/AF?

Why is hydro-electric power still scarce in some places?

What does Ambassador Taylor have to do with anything?

What exactly is "Japanese" Salt and Pepper?

Who was the first human to sleep on the Moon?



is this F 6'9 chord a figured bass or a chord extension?


Correct terminology for chord inversionsLilypond chord mode not rendering minor modifier in alternate chordModern convention for writing raised sixth in figured bass?English name for 3-tone chords that have the bass tone different from the rootHow does this drop 3 voicing work?Can we use double accidentals in figured bass?Do accidentals in a figured bass last the full measure, or do they only apply to that single chord?Figured bass and tiesHow to realize a figured bassNon-cadential use of 6/4 chord






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









3


















I am looking at a lead sheet for I loves You Porgy, and the chord notation reads like a figured bass but does it not make sense as such, so I am wondering, if it is intended as a chord extension for F6/9 chord?



Thanks in anticipation.



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    The notation does look like that of an inversion in classical music theory. But there is no 9th in a major triad. there is a 6 and 6/4.

    – ggcg
    Aug 12 at 11:21











  • I like this song as you can finely show that 79 chords can be analysed as a tower of 2 triads: e.g FMA9 = Cmajor over F ...

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 12 at 17:36












  • @AlbrechtHügli - what song is it? Where is the 79 chord? Aren't they just a continuation of 'stacked triads'. There's no tower!

    – Tim
    Aug 13 at 6:35











  • @ Tim: "I love you porgy." DO MI SO TI RE = I79 and LA DO MI SO TI = VI79. you can think you're playing I79 or imaging V/I (V over or above I)

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 13 at 11:22


















3


















I am looking at a lead sheet for I loves You Porgy, and the chord notation reads like a figured bass but does it not make sense as such, so I am wondering, if it is intended as a chord extension for F6/9 chord?



Thanks in anticipation.



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    The notation does look like that of an inversion in classical music theory. But there is no 9th in a major triad. there is a 6 and 6/4.

    – ggcg
    Aug 12 at 11:21











  • I like this song as you can finely show that 79 chords can be analysed as a tower of 2 triads: e.g FMA9 = Cmajor over F ...

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 12 at 17:36












  • @AlbrechtHügli - what song is it? Where is the 79 chord? Aren't they just a continuation of 'stacked triads'. There's no tower!

    – Tim
    Aug 13 at 6:35











  • @ Tim: "I love you porgy." DO MI SO TI RE = I79 and LA DO MI SO TI = VI79. you can think you're playing I79 or imaging V/I (V over or above I)

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 13 at 11:22














3













3









3








I am looking at a lead sheet for I loves You Porgy, and the chord notation reads like a figured bass but does it not make sense as such, so I am wondering, if it is intended as a chord extension for F6/9 chord?



Thanks in anticipation.



enter image description here










share|improve this question














I am looking at a lead sheet for I loves You Porgy, and the chord notation reads like a figured bass but does it not make sense as such, so I am wondering, if it is intended as a chord extension for F6/9 chord?



Thanks in anticipation.



enter image description here







chord-inversions figured-bass






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 12 at 9:51









ugajinugajin

612 bronze badges




612 bronze badges










  • 2





    The notation does look like that of an inversion in classical music theory. But there is no 9th in a major triad. there is a 6 and 6/4.

    – ggcg
    Aug 12 at 11:21











  • I like this song as you can finely show that 79 chords can be analysed as a tower of 2 triads: e.g FMA9 = Cmajor over F ...

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 12 at 17:36












  • @AlbrechtHügli - what song is it? Where is the 79 chord? Aren't they just a continuation of 'stacked triads'. There's no tower!

    – Tim
    Aug 13 at 6:35











  • @ Tim: "I love you porgy." DO MI SO TI RE = I79 and LA DO MI SO TI = VI79. you can think you're playing I79 or imaging V/I (V over or above I)

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 13 at 11:22













  • 2





    The notation does look like that of an inversion in classical music theory. But there is no 9th in a major triad. there is a 6 and 6/4.

    – ggcg
    Aug 12 at 11:21











  • I like this song as you can finely show that 79 chords can be analysed as a tower of 2 triads: e.g FMA9 = Cmajor over F ...

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 12 at 17:36












  • @AlbrechtHügli - what song is it? Where is the 79 chord? Aren't they just a continuation of 'stacked triads'. There's no tower!

    – Tim
    Aug 13 at 6:35











  • @ Tim: "I love you porgy." DO MI SO TI RE = I79 and LA DO MI SO TI = VI79. you can think you're playing I79 or imaging V/I (V over or above I)

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 13 at 11:22








2




2





The notation does look like that of an inversion in classical music theory. But there is no 9th in a major triad. there is a 6 and 6/4.

– ggcg
Aug 12 at 11:21





The notation does look like that of an inversion in classical music theory. But there is no 9th in a major triad. there is a 6 and 6/4.

– ggcg
Aug 12 at 11:21













I like this song as you can finely show that 79 chords can be analysed as a tower of 2 triads: e.g FMA9 = Cmajor over F ...

– Albrecht Hügli
Aug 12 at 17:36






I like this song as you can finely show that 79 chords can be analysed as a tower of 2 triads: e.g FMA9 = Cmajor over F ...

– Albrecht Hügli
Aug 12 at 17:36














@AlbrechtHügli - what song is it? Where is the 79 chord? Aren't they just a continuation of 'stacked triads'. There's no tower!

– Tim
Aug 13 at 6:35





@AlbrechtHügli - what song is it? Where is the 79 chord? Aren't they just a continuation of 'stacked triads'. There's no tower!

– Tim
Aug 13 at 6:35













@ Tim: "I love you porgy." DO MI SO TI RE = I79 and LA DO MI SO TI = VI79. you can think you're playing I79 or imaging V/I (V over or above I)

– Albrecht Hügli
Aug 13 at 11:22






@ Tim: "I love you porgy." DO MI SO TI RE = I79 and LA DO MI SO TI = VI79. you can think you're playing I79 or imaging V/I (V over or above I)

– Albrecht Hügli
Aug 13 at 11:22











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6



















69 chords are chords in their own right. They are major triad, with M6 and M9 added. So F69 comprises F A C D G. 9th chords generally are expected to include a 7th of some kind, unless they're 'add9' chords, but in 69 it's a 6th chord with an added 9, so no 7 is required.






share|improve this answer


























  • Sounds better too, without the 7 :)

    – ugajin
    Aug 12 at 10:53











  • Good answer but is the notation shown in the chart standard for a 69 chord? It looks like the notation for an inversion (confusing).

    – ggcg
    Aug 12 at 11:50











  • Fairly standard. Often it's written as 6/9 instead, with the 6 in superscript and the 9 horizontally offset, but some notation fonts use the stacked-with-no-divider version as shown above. My personal preference is between the two: stacked but horizontally offset numbers with no divider.

    – Jacob Smolowe
    Aug 12 at 15:08











  • @ ggcg: I don't think it's confusing, as in Jazz chords usually the inversions aren't shown in a classical way. An inversion would be notated as: F9/A

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 12 at 17:23


















3



















This is a plain major F with 6 and 9 (major) added for some color.



You can consider the 6 and 9 as optional, this symbol will sometimes appear when 6 or 9 is in the melody or when there is some nice voice leading possible (or characteristic to the piece) in the context.



--- update and clarification (after some additional comments)



When chords get jazzy, the notation becomes less about rules and more about conventions and communication (hand-waving). As you can tell from the various "identify the chord" questions on this site, it's far from an exact science.



A rule of the thumb for major chords is that you should not think about any specific notes, but first decide whether it's a dominant chord or not.



  • If it has no markings, 69, "M" or a triangle, it's a plain major chord.

  • If the chord notation includes just 7, 9, 11 or 13 or any alterations, it's likely a dominant.

When you know the function (major or dominant), then you can pick up the best sounding voicings - and there will be certain tension (no pun intended) between what's exatly in the chord symbol and what "plays right" in the context. It's an artistic choice - and with a choice, comes a responsibility.



A good resource and an eye opener is the Ralph Patt's Vanilla Book - a collection of standards that leaves out the "colors" up to the performer - and provides just the actual, vanilla chords.






share|improve this answer




























  • I wouldn't consider the 6 and 9 optional here any more than I'd consider the 7th optional in a major 7th chord. Sure you can leave them out, but you're probably losing some of the composer's intended sound for that chord.

    – Jacob Smolowe
    Aug 12 at 15:10






  • 1





    @JacobSmolowe I know exactly what you mean and generally I agree - sometimes it's precisely the color that's important. Nevertheless: 1) fakebooks like the one cited are already far from authors intentions, they are often more influenced by famous reinterpretations (and reharmonizations) than by the original. 2) sometimes even more important factors than 6 and 9

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 16:04






  • 1





    (continued) are things like exact voicing, bass, texture etc. While there is a profound difference between G and Gm, and a noticeable difference between G and G7, the difference between GM7, G69 and plain G is more a question of style. It would be interesting, by the way, to look at Gershwin's score for "Porgy and Bess", this would be the only way to know the authors intentions here.

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 16:22











  • I thought that real and fake books tried to show what the original lead sheet was.

    – Tim
    Aug 12 at 17:02











  • @Tim there probably was no "original lead sheet" for Porgy and Bess. Same for most other standards. Lead sheets are already a form of interpretation, like a black-and-white sketch of an architectural landmark. Also, the "original" version is often less known than its jazz reinterpretations, and fake books tend to represent the latter.

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 17:22



















1



















Yes, this is a chord extension. This is not at all a figured bass - imagine: Gershwin's music of the 20th century notated in figured bass, more Jazz that any other "classical" music!



This is the final chord of a phrase of the verse with an added 6th and an added 9th:



C9sus4 you could also interprete as an Gm9 above the root of C. The F96 contains F,C,G,A,C,D,F.



The added picture shows that F maj7 would be an option too, of course.
The 2 chords above the rest in OP's example are the transition chords to the bridge (B) in a minor.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "240"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87663%2fis-this-f-69-chord-a-figured-bass-or-a-chord-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6



















    69 chords are chords in their own right. They are major triad, with M6 and M9 added. So F69 comprises F A C D G. 9th chords generally are expected to include a 7th of some kind, unless they're 'add9' chords, but in 69 it's a 6th chord with an added 9, so no 7 is required.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Sounds better too, without the 7 :)

      – ugajin
      Aug 12 at 10:53











    • Good answer but is the notation shown in the chart standard for a 69 chord? It looks like the notation for an inversion (confusing).

      – ggcg
      Aug 12 at 11:50











    • Fairly standard. Often it's written as 6/9 instead, with the 6 in superscript and the 9 horizontally offset, but some notation fonts use the stacked-with-no-divider version as shown above. My personal preference is between the two: stacked but horizontally offset numbers with no divider.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:08











    • @ ggcg: I don't think it's confusing, as in Jazz chords usually the inversions aren't shown in a classical way. An inversion would be notated as: F9/A

      – Albrecht Hügli
      Aug 12 at 17:23















    6



















    69 chords are chords in their own right. They are major triad, with M6 and M9 added. So F69 comprises F A C D G. 9th chords generally are expected to include a 7th of some kind, unless they're 'add9' chords, but in 69 it's a 6th chord with an added 9, so no 7 is required.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Sounds better too, without the 7 :)

      – ugajin
      Aug 12 at 10:53











    • Good answer but is the notation shown in the chart standard for a 69 chord? It looks like the notation for an inversion (confusing).

      – ggcg
      Aug 12 at 11:50











    • Fairly standard. Often it's written as 6/9 instead, with the 6 in superscript and the 9 horizontally offset, but some notation fonts use the stacked-with-no-divider version as shown above. My personal preference is between the two: stacked but horizontally offset numbers with no divider.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:08











    • @ ggcg: I don't think it's confusing, as in Jazz chords usually the inversions aren't shown in a classical way. An inversion would be notated as: F9/A

      – Albrecht Hügli
      Aug 12 at 17:23













    6















    6











    6









    69 chords are chords in their own right. They are major triad, with M6 and M9 added. So F69 comprises F A C D G. 9th chords generally are expected to include a 7th of some kind, unless they're 'add9' chords, but in 69 it's a 6th chord with an added 9, so no 7 is required.






    share|improve this answer














    69 chords are chords in their own right. They are major triad, with M6 and M9 added. So F69 comprises F A C D G. 9th chords generally are expected to include a 7th of some kind, unless they're 'add9' chords, but in 69 it's a 6th chord with an added 9, so no 7 is required.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Aug 12 at 10:11









    TimTim

    120k12 gold badges113 silver badges295 bronze badges




    120k12 gold badges113 silver badges295 bronze badges















    • Sounds better too, without the 7 :)

      – ugajin
      Aug 12 at 10:53











    • Good answer but is the notation shown in the chart standard for a 69 chord? It looks like the notation for an inversion (confusing).

      – ggcg
      Aug 12 at 11:50











    • Fairly standard. Often it's written as 6/9 instead, with the 6 in superscript and the 9 horizontally offset, but some notation fonts use the stacked-with-no-divider version as shown above. My personal preference is between the two: stacked but horizontally offset numbers with no divider.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:08











    • @ ggcg: I don't think it's confusing, as in Jazz chords usually the inversions aren't shown in a classical way. An inversion would be notated as: F9/A

      – Albrecht Hügli
      Aug 12 at 17:23

















    • Sounds better too, without the 7 :)

      – ugajin
      Aug 12 at 10:53











    • Good answer but is the notation shown in the chart standard for a 69 chord? It looks like the notation for an inversion (confusing).

      – ggcg
      Aug 12 at 11:50











    • Fairly standard. Often it's written as 6/9 instead, with the 6 in superscript and the 9 horizontally offset, but some notation fonts use the stacked-with-no-divider version as shown above. My personal preference is between the two: stacked but horizontally offset numbers with no divider.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:08











    • @ ggcg: I don't think it's confusing, as in Jazz chords usually the inversions aren't shown in a classical way. An inversion would be notated as: F9/A

      – Albrecht Hügli
      Aug 12 at 17:23
















    Sounds better too, without the 7 :)

    – ugajin
    Aug 12 at 10:53





    Sounds better too, without the 7 :)

    – ugajin
    Aug 12 at 10:53













    Good answer but is the notation shown in the chart standard for a 69 chord? It looks like the notation for an inversion (confusing).

    – ggcg
    Aug 12 at 11:50





    Good answer but is the notation shown in the chart standard for a 69 chord? It looks like the notation for an inversion (confusing).

    – ggcg
    Aug 12 at 11:50













    Fairly standard. Often it's written as 6/9 instead, with the 6 in superscript and the 9 horizontally offset, but some notation fonts use the stacked-with-no-divider version as shown above. My personal preference is between the two: stacked but horizontally offset numbers with no divider.

    – Jacob Smolowe
    Aug 12 at 15:08





    Fairly standard. Often it's written as 6/9 instead, with the 6 in superscript and the 9 horizontally offset, but some notation fonts use the stacked-with-no-divider version as shown above. My personal preference is between the two: stacked but horizontally offset numbers with no divider.

    – Jacob Smolowe
    Aug 12 at 15:08













    @ ggcg: I don't think it's confusing, as in Jazz chords usually the inversions aren't shown in a classical way. An inversion would be notated as: F9/A

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 12 at 17:23





    @ ggcg: I don't think it's confusing, as in Jazz chords usually the inversions aren't shown in a classical way. An inversion would be notated as: F9/A

    – Albrecht Hügli
    Aug 12 at 17:23













    3



















    This is a plain major F with 6 and 9 (major) added for some color.



    You can consider the 6 and 9 as optional, this symbol will sometimes appear when 6 or 9 is in the melody or when there is some nice voice leading possible (or characteristic to the piece) in the context.



    --- update and clarification (after some additional comments)



    When chords get jazzy, the notation becomes less about rules and more about conventions and communication (hand-waving). As you can tell from the various "identify the chord" questions on this site, it's far from an exact science.



    A rule of the thumb for major chords is that you should not think about any specific notes, but first decide whether it's a dominant chord or not.



    • If it has no markings, 69, "M" or a triangle, it's a plain major chord.

    • If the chord notation includes just 7, 9, 11 or 13 or any alterations, it's likely a dominant.

    When you know the function (major or dominant), then you can pick up the best sounding voicings - and there will be certain tension (no pun intended) between what's exatly in the chord symbol and what "plays right" in the context. It's an artistic choice - and with a choice, comes a responsibility.



    A good resource and an eye opener is the Ralph Patt's Vanilla Book - a collection of standards that leaves out the "colors" up to the performer - and provides just the actual, vanilla chords.






    share|improve this answer




























    • I wouldn't consider the 6 and 9 optional here any more than I'd consider the 7th optional in a major 7th chord. Sure you can leave them out, but you're probably losing some of the composer's intended sound for that chord.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:10






    • 1





      @JacobSmolowe I know exactly what you mean and generally I agree - sometimes it's precisely the color that's important. Nevertheless: 1) fakebooks like the one cited are already far from authors intentions, they are often more influenced by famous reinterpretations (and reharmonizations) than by the original. 2) sometimes even more important factors than 6 and 9

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:04






    • 1





      (continued) are things like exact voicing, bass, texture etc. While there is a profound difference between G and Gm, and a noticeable difference between G and G7, the difference between GM7, G69 and plain G is more a question of style. It would be interesting, by the way, to look at Gershwin's score for "Porgy and Bess", this would be the only way to know the authors intentions here.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:22











    • I thought that real and fake books tried to show what the original lead sheet was.

      – Tim
      Aug 12 at 17:02











    • @Tim there probably was no "original lead sheet" for Porgy and Bess. Same for most other standards. Lead sheets are already a form of interpretation, like a black-and-white sketch of an architectural landmark. Also, the "original" version is often less known than its jazz reinterpretations, and fake books tend to represent the latter.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 17:22
















    3



















    This is a plain major F with 6 and 9 (major) added for some color.



    You can consider the 6 and 9 as optional, this symbol will sometimes appear when 6 or 9 is in the melody or when there is some nice voice leading possible (or characteristic to the piece) in the context.



    --- update and clarification (after some additional comments)



    When chords get jazzy, the notation becomes less about rules and more about conventions and communication (hand-waving). As you can tell from the various "identify the chord" questions on this site, it's far from an exact science.



    A rule of the thumb for major chords is that you should not think about any specific notes, but first decide whether it's a dominant chord or not.



    • If it has no markings, 69, "M" or a triangle, it's a plain major chord.

    • If the chord notation includes just 7, 9, 11 or 13 or any alterations, it's likely a dominant.

    When you know the function (major or dominant), then you can pick up the best sounding voicings - and there will be certain tension (no pun intended) between what's exatly in the chord symbol and what "plays right" in the context. It's an artistic choice - and with a choice, comes a responsibility.



    A good resource and an eye opener is the Ralph Patt's Vanilla Book - a collection of standards that leaves out the "colors" up to the performer - and provides just the actual, vanilla chords.






    share|improve this answer




























    • I wouldn't consider the 6 and 9 optional here any more than I'd consider the 7th optional in a major 7th chord. Sure you can leave them out, but you're probably losing some of the composer's intended sound for that chord.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:10






    • 1





      @JacobSmolowe I know exactly what you mean and generally I agree - sometimes it's precisely the color that's important. Nevertheless: 1) fakebooks like the one cited are already far from authors intentions, they are often more influenced by famous reinterpretations (and reharmonizations) than by the original. 2) sometimes even more important factors than 6 and 9

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:04






    • 1





      (continued) are things like exact voicing, bass, texture etc. While there is a profound difference between G and Gm, and a noticeable difference between G and G7, the difference between GM7, G69 and plain G is more a question of style. It would be interesting, by the way, to look at Gershwin's score for "Porgy and Bess", this would be the only way to know the authors intentions here.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:22











    • I thought that real and fake books tried to show what the original lead sheet was.

      – Tim
      Aug 12 at 17:02











    • @Tim there probably was no "original lead sheet" for Porgy and Bess. Same for most other standards. Lead sheets are already a form of interpretation, like a black-and-white sketch of an architectural landmark. Also, the "original" version is often less known than its jazz reinterpretations, and fake books tend to represent the latter.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 17:22














    3















    3











    3









    This is a plain major F with 6 and 9 (major) added for some color.



    You can consider the 6 and 9 as optional, this symbol will sometimes appear when 6 or 9 is in the melody or when there is some nice voice leading possible (or characteristic to the piece) in the context.



    --- update and clarification (after some additional comments)



    When chords get jazzy, the notation becomes less about rules and more about conventions and communication (hand-waving). As you can tell from the various "identify the chord" questions on this site, it's far from an exact science.



    A rule of the thumb for major chords is that you should not think about any specific notes, but first decide whether it's a dominant chord or not.



    • If it has no markings, 69, "M" or a triangle, it's a plain major chord.

    • If the chord notation includes just 7, 9, 11 or 13 or any alterations, it's likely a dominant.

    When you know the function (major or dominant), then you can pick up the best sounding voicings - and there will be certain tension (no pun intended) between what's exatly in the chord symbol and what "plays right" in the context. It's an artistic choice - and with a choice, comes a responsibility.



    A good resource and an eye opener is the Ralph Patt's Vanilla Book - a collection of standards that leaves out the "colors" up to the performer - and provides just the actual, vanilla chords.






    share|improve this answer
















    This is a plain major F with 6 and 9 (major) added for some color.



    You can consider the 6 and 9 as optional, this symbol will sometimes appear when 6 or 9 is in the melody or when there is some nice voice leading possible (or characteristic to the piece) in the context.



    --- update and clarification (after some additional comments)



    When chords get jazzy, the notation becomes less about rules and more about conventions and communication (hand-waving). As you can tell from the various "identify the chord" questions on this site, it's far from an exact science.



    A rule of the thumb for major chords is that you should not think about any specific notes, but first decide whether it's a dominant chord or not.



    • If it has no markings, 69, "M" or a triangle, it's a plain major chord.

    • If the chord notation includes just 7, 9, 11 or 13 or any alterations, it's likely a dominant.

    When you know the function (major or dominant), then you can pick up the best sounding voicings - and there will be certain tension (no pun intended) between what's exatly in the chord symbol and what "plays right" in the context. It's an artistic choice - and with a choice, comes a responsibility.



    A good resource and an eye opener is the Ralph Patt's Vanilla Book - a collection of standards that leaves out the "colors" up to the performer - and provides just the actual, vanilla chords.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 12 at 16:41

























    answered Aug 12 at 10:12









    fdregerfdreger

    9005 silver badges9 bronze badges




    9005 silver badges9 bronze badges















    • I wouldn't consider the 6 and 9 optional here any more than I'd consider the 7th optional in a major 7th chord. Sure you can leave them out, but you're probably losing some of the composer's intended sound for that chord.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:10






    • 1





      @JacobSmolowe I know exactly what you mean and generally I agree - sometimes it's precisely the color that's important. Nevertheless: 1) fakebooks like the one cited are already far from authors intentions, they are often more influenced by famous reinterpretations (and reharmonizations) than by the original. 2) sometimes even more important factors than 6 and 9

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:04






    • 1





      (continued) are things like exact voicing, bass, texture etc. While there is a profound difference between G and Gm, and a noticeable difference between G and G7, the difference between GM7, G69 and plain G is more a question of style. It would be interesting, by the way, to look at Gershwin's score for "Porgy and Bess", this would be the only way to know the authors intentions here.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:22











    • I thought that real and fake books tried to show what the original lead sheet was.

      – Tim
      Aug 12 at 17:02











    • @Tim there probably was no "original lead sheet" for Porgy and Bess. Same for most other standards. Lead sheets are already a form of interpretation, like a black-and-white sketch of an architectural landmark. Also, the "original" version is often less known than its jazz reinterpretations, and fake books tend to represent the latter.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 17:22


















    • I wouldn't consider the 6 and 9 optional here any more than I'd consider the 7th optional in a major 7th chord. Sure you can leave them out, but you're probably losing some of the composer's intended sound for that chord.

      – Jacob Smolowe
      Aug 12 at 15:10






    • 1





      @JacobSmolowe I know exactly what you mean and generally I agree - sometimes it's precisely the color that's important. Nevertheless: 1) fakebooks like the one cited are already far from authors intentions, they are often more influenced by famous reinterpretations (and reharmonizations) than by the original. 2) sometimes even more important factors than 6 and 9

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:04






    • 1





      (continued) are things like exact voicing, bass, texture etc. While there is a profound difference between G and Gm, and a noticeable difference between G and G7, the difference between GM7, G69 and plain G is more a question of style. It would be interesting, by the way, to look at Gershwin's score for "Porgy and Bess", this would be the only way to know the authors intentions here.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 16:22











    • I thought that real and fake books tried to show what the original lead sheet was.

      – Tim
      Aug 12 at 17:02











    • @Tim there probably was no "original lead sheet" for Porgy and Bess. Same for most other standards. Lead sheets are already a form of interpretation, like a black-and-white sketch of an architectural landmark. Also, the "original" version is often less known than its jazz reinterpretations, and fake books tend to represent the latter.

      – fdreger
      Aug 12 at 17:22

















    I wouldn't consider the 6 and 9 optional here any more than I'd consider the 7th optional in a major 7th chord. Sure you can leave them out, but you're probably losing some of the composer's intended sound for that chord.

    – Jacob Smolowe
    Aug 12 at 15:10





    I wouldn't consider the 6 and 9 optional here any more than I'd consider the 7th optional in a major 7th chord. Sure you can leave them out, but you're probably losing some of the composer's intended sound for that chord.

    – Jacob Smolowe
    Aug 12 at 15:10




    1




    1





    @JacobSmolowe I know exactly what you mean and generally I agree - sometimes it's precisely the color that's important. Nevertheless: 1) fakebooks like the one cited are already far from authors intentions, they are often more influenced by famous reinterpretations (and reharmonizations) than by the original. 2) sometimes even more important factors than 6 and 9

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 16:04





    @JacobSmolowe I know exactly what you mean and generally I agree - sometimes it's precisely the color that's important. Nevertheless: 1) fakebooks like the one cited are already far from authors intentions, they are often more influenced by famous reinterpretations (and reharmonizations) than by the original. 2) sometimes even more important factors than 6 and 9

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 16:04




    1




    1





    (continued) are things like exact voicing, bass, texture etc. While there is a profound difference between G and Gm, and a noticeable difference between G and G7, the difference between GM7, G69 and plain G is more a question of style. It would be interesting, by the way, to look at Gershwin's score for "Porgy and Bess", this would be the only way to know the authors intentions here.

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 16:22





    (continued) are things like exact voicing, bass, texture etc. While there is a profound difference between G and Gm, and a noticeable difference between G and G7, the difference between GM7, G69 and plain G is more a question of style. It would be interesting, by the way, to look at Gershwin's score for "Porgy and Bess", this would be the only way to know the authors intentions here.

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 16:22













    I thought that real and fake books tried to show what the original lead sheet was.

    – Tim
    Aug 12 at 17:02





    I thought that real and fake books tried to show what the original lead sheet was.

    – Tim
    Aug 12 at 17:02













    @Tim there probably was no "original lead sheet" for Porgy and Bess. Same for most other standards. Lead sheets are already a form of interpretation, like a black-and-white sketch of an architectural landmark. Also, the "original" version is often less known than its jazz reinterpretations, and fake books tend to represent the latter.

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 17:22






    @Tim there probably was no "original lead sheet" for Porgy and Bess. Same for most other standards. Lead sheets are already a form of interpretation, like a black-and-white sketch of an architectural landmark. Also, the "original" version is often less known than its jazz reinterpretations, and fake books tend to represent the latter.

    – fdreger
    Aug 12 at 17:22












    1



















    Yes, this is a chord extension. This is not at all a figured bass - imagine: Gershwin's music of the 20th century notated in figured bass, more Jazz that any other "classical" music!



    This is the final chord of a phrase of the verse with an added 6th and an added 9th:



    C9sus4 you could also interprete as an Gm9 above the root of C. The F96 contains F,C,G,A,C,D,F.



    The added picture shows that F maj7 would be an option too, of course.
    The 2 chords above the rest in OP's example are the transition chords to the bridge (B) in a minor.



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
































      1



















      Yes, this is a chord extension. This is not at all a figured bass - imagine: Gershwin's music of the 20th century notated in figured bass, more Jazz that any other "classical" music!



      This is the final chord of a phrase of the verse with an added 6th and an added 9th:



      C9sus4 you could also interprete as an Gm9 above the root of C. The F96 contains F,C,G,A,C,D,F.



      The added picture shows that F maj7 would be an option too, of course.
      The 2 chords above the rest in OP's example are the transition chords to the bridge (B) in a minor.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer






























        1















        1











        1









        Yes, this is a chord extension. This is not at all a figured bass - imagine: Gershwin's music of the 20th century notated in figured bass, more Jazz that any other "classical" music!



        This is the final chord of a phrase of the verse with an added 6th and an added 9th:



        C9sus4 you could also interprete as an Gm9 above the root of C. The F96 contains F,C,G,A,C,D,F.



        The added picture shows that F maj7 would be an option too, of course.
        The 2 chords above the rest in OP's example are the transition chords to the bridge (B) in a minor.



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer
















        Yes, this is a chord extension. This is not at all a figured bass - imagine: Gershwin's music of the 20th century notated in figured bass, more Jazz that any other "classical" music!



        This is the final chord of a phrase of the verse with an added 6th and an added 9th:



        C9sus4 you could also interprete as an Gm9 above the root of C. The F96 contains F,C,G,A,C,D,F.



        The added picture shows that F maj7 would be an option too, of course.
        The 2 chords above the rest in OP's example are the transition chords to the bridge (B) in a minor.



        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited Aug 12 at 17:34

























        answered Aug 12 at 17:16









        Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli

        11.6k1 gold badge10 silver badges35 bronze badges




        11.6k1 gold badge10 silver badges35 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87663%2fis-this-f-69-chord-a-figured-bass-or-a-chord-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?