Should I ask for permission to write an expository post about someone else's research?When meeting a professor for the first time, is it always a good idea to ask about their research interests?Advisor publishing students' work as sole author - ethics and motivationHow to get rid of unwanted and annoying co-author?When should I ask questions about a paper?Is it offensive to ask my PhD advisor for permission to record our research/technical discussions?Grounds for an ethics complaint? UK math prof. publicly misrepresenting results from an unrelated disciplineWhen do I need permission from website owners before data mining their pages for research?Should I be honest when someone ask which part of the paper is mine?I want to write a blog post building upon someone else's paper, how can I properly cite/credit them?
Why is super hero technology never used by civilians?
Were any DOS games (or software) known to use VBE/AF?
Does the horse hair in a bow all go in the same direction?
Mostly pluses and minuses: says Grandpa
How to color a fraction bar in mathematical mode?
What is this machine's purpose?
Is the sentence "pay some in cash" understandable?
Are there concrete advantages for being proficient at social skills in a table that rewards roleplaying these interactions?
Is it possible to create a patch config file for log level?
Relative positioning of two axis environments
What is the name of this current called in this regulator datasheet?
Is there a text editor that can run shell scripts?
Can a microwave oven cook chicken?
Raised concerns about a security vulnerability to various managers, for more than a year, with no results. Should I mention it to external auditors?
Origin of the word "delete"
Conflict between a religious belief that accounts for the existence of transgender people vs. one that doesn't
Where is the node created timestamp stored in the database?
Is there any math conjecture that would cause a lot of damage if disproven?
What is an example of a sequence which "thins out" and is finite?
What does Ambassador Taylor have to do with anything?
Does the German President's apology for WWII reflect the prevailing views of the people of Germany?
In an interview, is it self-defeating to say you use StackOverflow to find errors in code?
Can increasing the amount of training data make overfitting worse?
When to use Sitecore.Context.Items and why?
Should I ask for permission to write an expository post about someone else's research?
When meeting a professor for the first time, is it always a good idea to ask about their research interests?Advisor publishing students' work as sole author - ethics and motivationHow to get rid of unwanted and annoying co-author?When should I ask questions about a paper?Is it offensive to ask my PhD advisor for permission to record our research/technical discussions?Grounds for an ethics complaint? UK math prof. publicly misrepresenting results from an unrelated disciplineWhen do I need permission from website owners before data mining their pages for research?Should I be honest when someone ask which part of the paper is mine?I want to write a blog post building upon someone else's paper, how can I properly cite/credit them?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I am a math PhD student in North America about to enter my second year. Last week I attended a conference and was interested in a research presentation by a professor at another school. The presentation was about some of his current (unpublished) methods and results to attack a problem in combinatorics. I am thinking of writing an expository post about his talk in my personal blog.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research? My concern is that he hasn't published the results and so might not want to put them in public yet. I have seen people writing expository posts about talks or papers that they read or hear about (for example here), but I'm not sure if they need permission from the original author(s) to do so.
mathematics ethics etiquette blog
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
add a comment
|
I am a math PhD student in North America about to enter my second year. Last week I attended a conference and was interested in a research presentation by a professor at another school. The presentation was about some of his current (unpublished) methods and results to attack a problem in combinatorics. I am thinking of writing an expository post about his talk in my personal blog.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research? My concern is that he hasn't published the results and so might not want to put them in public yet. I have seen people writing expository posts about talks or papers that they read or hear about (for example here), but I'm not sure if they need permission from the original author(s) to do so.
mathematics ethics etiquette blog
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
2
Consider not thinking of yourself as a "PhD student". You're not studying a PhD, nor are you just studying "for a PhD" in the sense that (undergrad) students do. You're a junior researcher and a PhD candidate; and a student only in a limited sense.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 11 at 19:46
13
@einpoklum May I ask why this is relevant to OP's question?
– Agnishom Chattopadhyay
Aug 12 at 8:17
5
@AgnishomChattopadhyay: 1. OP seems to exhibit an overly self-deprecating attitude; that might be related to a self-perception as a "lowly student" vs a "Professor", as opposed to a less-experienced vs more-experienced researcher. But my main point is in my answer. 2. It is relevant to how OP describes/perceives an aspect of academia; I want to de-incluldate this perception in other readers.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 12 at 8:52
1
Just to state the obvious: if you do write up something, be very clear in attributing it to their original presentation.
– Emilio M Bumachar
Aug 12 at 12:19
add a comment
|
I am a math PhD student in North America about to enter my second year. Last week I attended a conference and was interested in a research presentation by a professor at another school. The presentation was about some of his current (unpublished) methods and results to attack a problem in combinatorics. I am thinking of writing an expository post about his talk in my personal blog.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research? My concern is that he hasn't published the results and so might not want to put them in public yet. I have seen people writing expository posts about talks or papers that they read or hear about (for example here), but I'm not sure if they need permission from the original author(s) to do so.
mathematics ethics etiquette blog
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
I am a math PhD student in North America about to enter my second year. Last week I attended a conference and was interested in a research presentation by a professor at another school. The presentation was about some of his current (unpublished) methods and results to attack a problem in combinatorics. I am thinking of writing an expository post about his talk in my personal blog.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research? My concern is that he hasn't published the results and so might not want to put them in public yet. I have seen people writing expository posts about talks or papers that they read or hear about (for example here), but I'm not sure if they need permission from the original author(s) to do so.
mathematics ethics etiquette blog
mathematics ethics etiquette blog
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
edited Aug 12 at 8:24
Massimo Ortolano♦
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
42.1k14 gold badges126 silver badges158 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
asked Aug 11 at 4:09
iontrappingiontrapping
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
2011 silver badge3 bronze badges
2
Consider not thinking of yourself as a "PhD student". You're not studying a PhD, nor are you just studying "for a PhD" in the sense that (undergrad) students do. You're a junior researcher and a PhD candidate; and a student only in a limited sense.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 11 at 19:46
13
@einpoklum May I ask why this is relevant to OP's question?
– Agnishom Chattopadhyay
Aug 12 at 8:17
5
@AgnishomChattopadhyay: 1. OP seems to exhibit an overly self-deprecating attitude; that might be related to a self-perception as a "lowly student" vs a "Professor", as opposed to a less-experienced vs more-experienced researcher. But my main point is in my answer. 2. It is relevant to how OP describes/perceives an aspect of academia; I want to de-incluldate this perception in other readers.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 12 at 8:52
1
Just to state the obvious: if you do write up something, be very clear in attributing it to their original presentation.
– Emilio M Bumachar
Aug 12 at 12:19
add a comment
|
2
Consider not thinking of yourself as a "PhD student". You're not studying a PhD, nor are you just studying "for a PhD" in the sense that (undergrad) students do. You're a junior researcher and a PhD candidate; and a student only in a limited sense.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 11 at 19:46
13
@einpoklum May I ask why this is relevant to OP's question?
– Agnishom Chattopadhyay
Aug 12 at 8:17
5
@AgnishomChattopadhyay: 1. OP seems to exhibit an overly self-deprecating attitude; that might be related to a self-perception as a "lowly student" vs a "Professor", as opposed to a less-experienced vs more-experienced researcher. But my main point is in my answer. 2. It is relevant to how OP describes/perceives an aspect of academia; I want to de-incluldate this perception in other readers.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 12 at 8:52
1
Just to state the obvious: if you do write up something, be very clear in attributing it to their original presentation.
– Emilio M Bumachar
Aug 12 at 12:19
2
2
Consider not thinking of yourself as a "PhD student". You're not studying a PhD, nor are you just studying "for a PhD" in the sense that (undergrad) students do. You're a junior researcher and a PhD candidate; and a student only in a limited sense.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 11 at 19:46
Consider not thinking of yourself as a "PhD student". You're not studying a PhD, nor are you just studying "for a PhD" in the sense that (undergrad) students do. You're a junior researcher and a PhD candidate; and a student only in a limited sense.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 11 at 19:46
13
13
@einpoklum May I ask why this is relevant to OP's question?
– Agnishom Chattopadhyay
Aug 12 at 8:17
@einpoklum May I ask why this is relevant to OP's question?
– Agnishom Chattopadhyay
Aug 12 at 8:17
5
5
@AgnishomChattopadhyay: 1. OP seems to exhibit an overly self-deprecating attitude; that might be related to a self-perception as a "lowly student" vs a "Professor", as opposed to a less-experienced vs more-experienced researcher. But my main point is in my answer. 2. It is relevant to how OP describes/perceives an aspect of academia; I want to de-incluldate this perception in other readers.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 12 at 8:52
@AgnishomChattopadhyay: 1. OP seems to exhibit an overly self-deprecating attitude; that might be related to a self-perception as a "lowly student" vs a "Professor", as opposed to a less-experienced vs more-experienced researcher. But my main point is in my answer. 2. It is relevant to how OP describes/perceives an aspect of academia; I want to de-incluldate this perception in other readers.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 12 at 8:52
1
1
Just to state the obvious: if you do write up something, be very clear in attributing it to their original presentation.
– Emilio M Bumachar
Aug 12 at 12:19
Just to state the obvious: if you do write up something, be very clear in attributing it to their original presentation.
– Emilio M Bumachar
Aug 12 at 12:19
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I don't think you strictly need permission, but I would recommend asking the speaker anyway, out of simple courtesy. People are aware when they give a talk that they are making the information public, and that the audience members may share what they have learned, but putting it on the Internet may speed up that process more than the speaker is expecting. Posting about the talk without the author's consent, or at least notifying them, isn't unethical, but it is sort of "bad manners".
If the speaker asks you to wait, I would suggest you honor that request: partly out of general professional courtesy, and partly because it isn't good politics as a PhD student to get on the bad side of senior people, especially if you work in this area. You may be applying for a postdoc with this person someday. I would guess that at most, they might say something like "We plan to post a preprint in a few weeks; could you hold off until then?"
As a possible side benefit, when you contact the speaker to ask if it's okay with them, they might also volunteer some other information for you to use in your writeup: copies of their slides, further details, a preprint, etc.
If they say it's okay, then as a further courtesy, you may want to send them a copy of your writeup before you post it, to see if they have any comments or notice any errors. Or at least send them a link when you post it, and be ready to respond to any feedback they may have.
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
7
Apart from manners, there is a second issue at hand here: You need to check that what you are divulging is actually likely true. Otherwise, the following can easily happen: The author finds a mistake and drops the project; people keep learning about it from your blog and asking the author why it isn't published; the author points at you as being the source of the misinformation and the embarrassment. Journalists are rightfully getting criticized for fishing for rash statements; make sure not to look like their scientific equivalent.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 10:13
@darijgrinberg I think that's significant enough to merit an answer rather than a comment. :)
– João Mendes
Aug 12 at 14:28
@darijgrinberg but is it common practice to give talks about results which you do not consider to be likely true? In OP's situation, a talk has already been given. Besides, if a person A publishes a wrong theorem and a person B publishes how to correctly deduce another theorem from A's theorem, are people going to criticize B? I don't think I would criticize B (a situation like this where B was V. Arnold did happen, but I think Arnold did not actually publish the result, he noticed it while rereading his preprint).
– sis
Aug 12 at 14:33
1
@sis: No one deliberately presents wrong results, but many errors only manifest when writing down the proof, which often happens long after the talk. Talks don't really count as publication; you cannot cite them in your paper.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 14:42
@darijgrinberg I agree with you. I mean that if a person wrote an expository blog article about a result that was claimed by someone in a talk, and that result turns out to be wrong, in my opinion it would be incorrect to criticize the person who wrote the blog (as long as proper attributions were given). The person who gave a talk by giving a talk implied that (s)he was reasonably confident about the result so the blame rests with him/her, in my opinion.
– sis
Aug 12 at 15:58
add a comment
|
The general way to proceed has already been addressed in Nate's answer.
However, you should note that there are also conferences which have policies which explicitly forbid public use of information communicated at the conference (with the goal of fostering open exchange of unpublished results). The examples I know are the Gordon Research Conferences/Workshops, see. their policy. Thus, make sure to check whether the conference has such a policy in place (in the cases I remember, this policy has also been clearly communicated at the beginning of the conference).
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
This may be a field specific phenomenon - the subjects of the Gordon Research Conferences don’t appear to include mathematics, and I think such a policy would be seen as fairly exceptional in math.
– Henry
Aug 12 at 3:16
add a comment
|
tl;dr: No, it's fine (but send him a link).
My concern is that he hasn't published the results
But he has published his approach - by giving a presentation about it. And you can only write about what he talked about in that presentation.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research?
As long as you don't misrepresent what he said in his presentation - there's really no need.
As a courtesy, however, I'd email him a note about your blog post with a link to it. If anything bothers him, he can write you.
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134524%2fshould-i-ask-for-permission-to-write-an-expository-post-about-someone-elses-res%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don't think you strictly need permission, but I would recommend asking the speaker anyway, out of simple courtesy. People are aware when they give a talk that they are making the information public, and that the audience members may share what they have learned, but putting it on the Internet may speed up that process more than the speaker is expecting. Posting about the talk without the author's consent, or at least notifying them, isn't unethical, but it is sort of "bad manners".
If the speaker asks you to wait, I would suggest you honor that request: partly out of general professional courtesy, and partly because it isn't good politics as a PhD student to get on the bad side of senior people, especially if you work in this area. You may be applying for a postdoc with this person someday. I would guess that at most, they might say something like "We plan to post a preprint in a few weeks; could you hold off until then?"
As a possible side benefit, when you contact the speaker to ask if it's okay with them, they might also volunteer some other information for you to use in your writeup: copies of their slides, further details, a preprint, etc.
If they say it's okay, then as a further courtesy, you may want to send them a copy of your writeup before you post it, to see if they have any comments or notice any errors. Or at least send them a link when you post it, and be ready to respond to any feedback they may have.
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
7
Apart from manners, there is a second issue at hand here: You need to check that what you are divulging is actually likely true. Otherwise, the following can easily happen: The author finds a mistake and drops the project; people keep learning about it from your blog and asking the author why it isn't published; the author points at you as being the source of the misinformation and the embarrassment. Journalists are rightfully getting criticized for fishing for rash statements; make sure not to look like their scientific equivalent.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 10:13
@darijgrinberg I think that's significant enough to merit an answer rather than a comment. :)
– João Mendes
Aug 12 at 14:28
@darijgrinberg but is it common practice to give talks about results which you do not consider to be likely true? In OP's situation, a talk has already been given. Besides, if a person A publishes a wrong theorem and a person B publishes how to correctly deduce another theorem from A's theorem, are people going to criticize B? I don't think I would criticize B (a situation like this where B was V. Arnold did happen, but I think Arnold did not actually publish the result, he noticed it while rereading his preprint).
– sis
Aug 12 at 14:33
1
@sis: No one deliberately presents wrong results, but many errors only manifest when writing down the proof, which often happens long after the talk. Talks don't really count as publication; you cannot cite them in your paper.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 14:42
@darijgrinberg I agree with you. I mean that if a person wrote an expository blog article about a result that was claimed by someone in a talk, and that result turns out to be wrong, in my opinion it would be incorrect to criticize the person who wrote the blog (as long as proper attributions were given). The person who gave a talk by giving a talk implied that (s)he was reasonably confident about the result so the blame rests with him/her, in my opinion.
– sis
Aug 12 at 15:58
add a comment
|
I don't think you strictly need permission, but I would recommend asking the speaker anyway, out of simple courtesy. People are aware when they give a talk that they are making the information public, and that the audience members may share what they have learned, but putting it on the Internet may speed up that process more than the speaker is expecting. Posting about the talk without the author's consent, or at least notifying them, isn't unethical, but it is sort of "bad manners".
If the speaker asks you to wait, I would suggest you honor that request: partly out of general professional courtesy, and partly because it isn't good politics as a PhD student to get on the bad side of senior people, especially if you work in this area. You may be applying for a postdoc with this person someday. I would guess that at most, they might say something like "We plan to post a preprint in a few weeks; could you hold off until then?"
As a possible side benefit, when you contact the speaker to ask if it's okay with them, they might also volunteer some other information for you to use in your writeup: copies of their slides, further details, a preprint, etc.
If they say it's okay, then as a further courtesy, you may want to send them a copy of your writeup before you post it, to see if they have any comments or notice any errors. Or at least send them a link when you post it, and be ready to respond to any feedback they may have.
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
7
Apart from manners, there is a second issue at hand here: You need to check that what you are divulging is actually likely true. Otherwise, the following can easily happen: The author finds a mistake and drops the project; people keep learning about it from your blog and asking the author why it isn't published; the author points at you as being the source of the misinformation and the embarrassment. Journalists are rightfully getting criticized for fishing for rash statements; make sure not to look like their scientific equivalent.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 10:13
@darijgrinberg I think that's significant enough to merit an answer rather than a comment. :)
– João Mendes
Aug 12 at 14:28
@darijgrinberg but is it common practice to give talks about results which you do not consider to be likely true? In OP's situation, a talk has already been given. Besides, if a person A publishes a wrong theorem and a person B publishes how to correctly deduce another theorem from A's theorem, are people going to criticize B? I don't think I would criticize B (a situation like this where B was V. Arnold did happen, but I think Arnold did not actually publish the result, he noticed it while rereading his preprint).
– sis
Aug 12 at 14:33
1
@sis: No one deliberately presents wrong results, but many errors only manifest when writing down the proof, which often happens long after the talk. Talks don't really count as publication; you cannot cite them in your paper.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 14:42
@darijgrinberg I agree with you. I mean that if a person wrote an expository blog article about a result that was claimed by someone in a talk, and that result turns out to be wrong, in my opinion it would be incorrect to criticize the person who wrote the blog (as long as proper attributions were given). The person who gave a talk by giving a talk implied that (s)he was reasonably confident about the result so the blame rests with him/her, in my opinion.
– sis
Aug 12 at 15:58
add a comment
|
I don't think you strictly need permission, but I would recommend asking the speaker anyway, out of simple courtesy. People are aware when they give a talk that they are making the information public, and that the audience members may share what they have learned, but putting it on the Internet may speed up that process more than the speaker is expecting. Posting about the talk without the author's consent, or at least notifying them, isn't unethical, but it is sort of "bad manners".
If the speaker asks you to wait, I would suggest you honor that request: partly out of general professional courtesy, and partly because it isn't good politics as a PhD student to get on the bad side of senior people, especially if you work in this area. You may be applying for a postdoc with this person someday. I would guess that at most, they might say something like "We plan to post a preprint in a few weeks; could you hold off until then?"
As a possible side benefit, when you contact the speaker to ask if it's okay with them, they might also volunteer some other information for you to use in your writeup: copies of their slides, further details, a preprint, etc.
If they say it's okay, then as a further courtesy, you may want to send them a copy of your writeup before you post it, to see if they have any comments or notice any errors. Or at least send them a link when you post it, and be ready to respond to any feedback they may have.
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
I don't think you strictly need permission, but I would recommend asking the speaker anyway, out of simple courtesy. People are aware when they give a talk that they are making the information public, and that the audience members may share what they have learned, but putting it on the Internet may speed up that process more than the speaker is expecting. Posting about the talk without the author's consent, or at least notifying them, isn't unethical, but it is sort of "bad manners".
If the speaker asks you to wait, I would suggest you honor that request: partly out of general professional courtesy, and partly because it isn't good politics as a PhD student to get on the bad side of senior people, especially if you work in this area. You may be applying for a postdoc with this person someday. I would guess that at most, they might say something like "We plan to post a preprint in a few weeks; could you hold off until then?"
As a possible side benefit, when you contact the speaker to ask if it's okay with them, they might also volunteer some other information for you to use in your writeup: copies of their slides, further details, a preprint, etc.
If they say it's okay, then as a further courtesy, you may want to send them a copy of your writeup before you post it, to see if they have any comments or notice any errors. Or at least send them a link when you post it, and be ready to respond to any feedback they may have.
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 4:48
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
118k38 gold badges340 silver badges434 bronze badges
7
Apart from manners, there is a second issue at hand here: You need to check that what you are divulging is actually likely true. Otherwise, the following can easily happen: The author finds a mistake and drops the project; people keep learning about it from your blog and asking the author why it isn't published; the author points at you as being the source of the misinformation and the embarrassment. Journalists are rightfully getting criticized for fishing for rash statements; make sure not to look like their scientific equivalent.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 10:13
@darijgrinberg I think that's significant enough to merit an answer rather than a comment. :)
– João Mendes
Aug 12 at 14:28
@darijgrinberg but is it common practice to give talks about results which you do not consider to be likely true? In OP's situation, a talk has already been given. Besides, if a person A publishes a wrong theorem and a person B publishes how to correctly deduce another theorem from A's theorem, are people going to criticize B? I don't think I would criticize B (a situation like this where B was V. Arnold did happen, but I think Arnold did not actually publish the result, he noticed it while rereading his preprint).
– sis
Aug 12 at 14:33
1
@sis: No one deliberately presents wrong results, but many errors only manifest when writing down the proof, which often happens long after the talk. Talks don't really count as publication; you cannot cite them in your paper.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 14:42
@darijgrinberg I agree with you. I mean that if a person wrote an expository blog article about a result that was claimed by someone in a talk, and that result turns out to be wrong, in my opinion it would be incorrect to criticize the person who wrote the blog (as long as proper attributions were given). The person who gave a talk by giving a talk implied that (s)he was reasonably confident about the result so the blame rests with him/her, in my opinion.
– sis
Aug 12 at 15:58
add a comment
|
7
Apart from manners, there is a second issue at hand here: You need to check that what you are divulging is actually likely true. Otherwise, the following can easily happen: The author finds a mistake and drops the project; people keep learning about it from your blog and asking the author why it isn't published; the author points at you as being the source of the misinformation and the embarrassment. Journalists are rightfully getting criticized for fishing for rash statements; make sure not to look like their scientific equivalent.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 10:13
@darijgrinberg I think that's significant enough to merit an answer rather than a comment. :)
– João Mendes
Aug 12 at 14:28
@darijgrinberg but is it common practice to give talks about results which you do not consider to be likely true? In OP's situation, a talk has already been given. Besides, if a person A publishes a wrong theorem and a person B publishes how to correctly deduce another theorem from A's theorem, are people going to criticize B? I don't think I would criticize B (a situation like this where B was V. Arnold did happen, but I think Arnold did not actually publish the result, he noticed it while rereading his preprint).
– sis
Aug 12 at 14:33
1
@sis: No one deliberately presents wrong results, but many errors only manifest when writing down the proof, which often happens long after the talk. Talks don't really count as publication; you cannot cite them in your paper.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 14:42
@darijgrinberg I agree with you. I mean that if a person wrote an expository blog article about a result that was claimed by someone in a talk, and that result turns out to be wrong, in my opinion it would be incorrect to criticize the person who wrote the blog (as long as proper attributions were given). The person who gave a talk by giving a talk implied that (s)he was reasonably confident about the result so the blame rests with him/her, in my opinion.
– sis
Aug 12 at 15:58
7
7
Apart from manners, there is a second issue at hand here: You need to check that what you are divulging is actually likely true. Otherwise, the following can easily happen: The author finds a mistake and drops the project; people keep learning about it from your blog and asking the author why it isn't published; the author points at you as being the source of the misinformation and the embarrassment. Journalists are rightfully getting criticized for fishing for rash statements; make sure not to look like their scientific equivalent.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 10:13
Apart from manners, there is a second issue at hand here: You need to check that what you are divulging is actually likely true. Otherwise, the following can easily happen: The author finds a mistake and drops the project; people keep learning about it from your blog and asking the author why it isn't published; the author points at you as being the source of the misinformation and the embarrassment. Journalists are rightfully getting criticized for fishing for rash statements; make sure not to look like their scientific equivalent.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 10:13
@darijgrinberg I think that's significant enough to merit an answer rather than a comment. :)
– João Mendes
Aug 12 at 14:28
@darijgrinberg I think that's significant enough to merit an answer rather than a comment. :)
– João Mendes
Aug 12 at 14:28
@darijgrinberg but is it common practice to give talks about results which you do not consider to be likely true? In OP's situation, a talk has already been given. Besides, if a person A publishes a wrong theorem and a person B publishes how to correctly deduce another theorem from A's theorem, are people going to criticize B? I don't think I would criticize B (a situation like this where B was V. Arnold did happen, but I think Arnold did not actually publish the result, he noticed it while rereading his preprint).
– sis
Aug 12 at 14:33
@darijgrinberg but is it common practice to give talks about results which you do not consider to be likely true? In OP's situation, a talk has already been given. Besides, if a person A publishes a wrong theorem and a person B publishes how to correctly deduce another theorem from A's theorem, are people going to criticize B? I don't think I would criticize B (a situation like this where B was V. Arnold did happen, but I think Arnold did not actually publish the result, he noticed it while rereading his preprint).
– sis
Aug 12 at 14:33
1
1
@sis: No one deliberately presents wrong results, but many errors only manifest when writing down the proof, which often happens long after the talk. Talks don't really count as publication; you cannot cite them in your paper.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 14:42
@sis: No one deliberately presents wrong results, but many errors only manifest when writing down the proof, which often happens long after the talk. Talks don't really count as publication; you cannot cite them in your paper.
– darij grinberg
Aug 12 at 14:42
@darijgrinberg I agree with you. I mean that if a person wrote an expository blog article about a result that was claimed by someone in a talk, and that result turns out to be wrong, in my opinion it would be incorrect to criticize the person who wrote the blog (as long as proper attributions were given). The person who gave a talk by giving a talk implied that (s)he was reasonably confident about the result so the blame rests with him/her, in my opinion.
– sis
Aug 12 at 15:58
@darijgrinberg I agree with you. I mean that if a person wrote an expository blog article about a result that was claimed by someone in a talk, and that result turns out to be wrong, in my opinion it would be incorrect to criticize the person who wrote the blog (as long as proper attributions were given). The person who gave a talk by giving a talk implied that (s)he was reasonably confident about the result so the blame rests with him/her, in my opinion.
– sis
Aug 12 at 15:58
add a comment
|
The general way to proceed has already been addressed in Nate's answer.
However, you should note that there are also conferences which have policies which explicitly forbid public use of information communicated at the conference (with the goal of fostering open exchange of unpublished results). The examples I know are the Gordon Research Conferences/Workshops, see. their policy. Thus, make sure to check whether the conference has such a policy in place (in the cases I remember, this policy has also been clearly communicated at the beginning of the conference).
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
This may be a field specific phenomenon - the subjects of the Gordon Research Conferences don’t appear to include mathematics, and I think such a policy would be seen as fairly exceptional in math.
– Henry
Aug 12 at 3:16
add a comment
|
The general way to proceed has already been addressed in Nate's answer.
However, you should note that there are also conferences which have policies which explicitly forbid public use of information communicated at the conference (with the goal of fostering open exchange of unpublished results). The examples I know are the Gordon Research Conferences/Workshops, see. their policy. Thus, make sure to check whether the conference has such a policy in place (in the cases I remember, this policy has also been clearly communicated at the beginning of the conference).
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
This may be a field specific phenomenon - the subjects of the Gordon Research Conferences don’t appear to include mathematics, and I think such a policy would be seen as fairly exceptional in math.
– Henry
Aug 12 at 3:16
add a comment
|
The general way to proceed has already been addressed in Nate's answer.
However, you should note that there are also conferences which have policies which explicitly forbid public use of information communicated at the conference (with the goal of fostering open exchange of unpublished results). The examples I know are the Gordon Research Conferences/Workshops, see. their policy. Thus, make sure to check whether the conference has such a policy in place (in the cases I remember, this policy has also been clearly communicated at the beginning of the conference).
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
The general way to proceed has already been addressed in Nate's answer.
However, you should note that there are also conferences which have policies which explicitly forbid public use of information communicated at the conference (with the goal of fostering open exchange of unpublished results). The examples I know are the Gordon Research Conferences/Workshops, see. their policy. Thus, make sure to check whether the conference has such a policy in place (in the cases I remember, this policy has also been clearly communicated at the beginning of the conference).
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 11:01
ndplndpl
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
3802 silver badges8 bronze badges
This may be a field specific phenomenon - the subjects of the Gordon Research Conferences don’t appear to include mathematics, and I think such a policy would be seen as fairly exceptional in math.
– Henry
Aug 12 at 3:16
add a comment
|
This may be a field specific phenomenon - the subjects of the Gordon Research Conferences don’t appear to include mathematics, and I think such a policy would be seen as fairly exceptional in math.
– Henry
Aug 12 at 3:16
This may be a field specific phenomenon - the subjects of the Gordon Research Conferences don’t appear to include mathematics, and I think such a policy would be seen as fairly exceptional in math.
– Henry
Aug 12 at 3:16
This may be a field specific phenomenon - the subjects of the Gordon Research Conferences don’t appear to include mathematics, and I think such a policy would be seen as fairly exceptional in math.
– Henry
Aug 12 at 3:16
add a comment
|
tl;dr: No, it's fine (but send him a link).
My concern is that he hasn't published the results
But he has published his approach - by giving a presentation about it. And you can only write about what he talked about in that presentation.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research?
As long as you don't misrepresent what he said in his presentation - there's really no need.
As a courtesy, however, I'd email him a note about your blog post with a link to it. If anything bothers him, he can write you.
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
add a comment
|
tl;dr: No, it's fine (but send him a link).
My concern is that he hasn't published the results
But he has published his approach - by giving a presentation about it. And you can only write about what he talked about in that presentation.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research?
As long as you don't misrepresent what he said in his presentation - there's really no need.
As a courtesy, however, I'd email him a note about your blog post with a link to it. If anything bothers him, he can write you.
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
add a comment
|
tl;dr: No, it's fine (but send him a link).
My concern is that he hasn't published the results
But he has published his approach - by giving a presentation about it. And you can only write about what he talked about in that presentation.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research?
As long as you don't misrepresent what he said in his presentation - there's really no need.
As a courtesy, however, I'd email him a note about your blog post with a link to it. If anything bothers him, he can write you.
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
tl;dr: No, it's fine (but send him a link).
My concern is that he hasn't published the results
But he has published his approach - by giving a presentation about it. And you can only write about what he talked about in that presentation.
Question: Should I contact the professor to ask for permission to write about his research?
As long as you don't misrepresent what he said in his presentation - there's really no need.
As a courtesy, however, I'd email him a note about your blog post with a link to it. If anything bothers him, he can write you.
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
edited Aug 11 at 21:06
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
answered Aug 11 at 19:50
einpoklum - reinstate Monicaeinpoklum - reinstate Monica
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
29.5k2 gold badges47 silver badges157 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134524%2fshould-i-ask-for-permission-to-write-an-expository-post-about-someone-elses-res%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Consider not thinking of yourself as a "PhD student". You're not studying a PhD, nor are you just studying "for a PhD" in the sense that (undergrad) students do. You're a junior researcher and a PhD candidate; and a student only in a limited sense.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 11 at 19:46
13
@einpoklum May I ask why this is relevant to OP's question?
– Agnishom Chattopadhyay
Aug 12 at 8:17
5
@AgnishomChattopadhyay: 1. OP seems to exhibit an overly self-deprecating attitude; that might be related to a self-perception as a "lowly student" vs a "Professor", as opposed to a less-experienced vs more-experienced researcher. But my main point is in my answer. 2. It is relevant to how OP describes/perceives an aspect of academia; I want to de-incluldate this perception in other readers.
– einpoklum - reinstate Monica
Aug 12 at 8:52
1
Just to state the obvious: if you do write up something, be very clear in attributing it to their original presentation.
– Emilio M Bumachar
Aug 12 at 12:19