Spectrum of a Subspace of MatricesProving “almost all matrices over C are diagonalizable”.Matrices: characterizing pairs $(AB, BA)$What is known about the distribution of eigenvectors of random matrices?Is there a nice choice-free argument to count the number of sublattices?Complexity class of matrix generalization of knapsack problemRotatable matrix, its eigenvalues and eigenvectors

Spectrum of a Subspace of Matrices


Proving “almost all matrices over C are diagonalizable”.Matrices: characterizing pairs $(AB, BA)$What is known about the distribution of eigenvectors of random matrices?Is there a nice choice-free argument to count the number of sublattices?Complexity class of matrix generalization of knapsack problemRotatable matrix, its eigenvalues and eigenvectors













5















$begingroup$


I conjecture the following:




Let $U subset Bbb C^n times n$ be an affine subspace, and let $S_U$ denote the "spectrum of $U$", that is
$$
S_U = lambda in Bbb C : det(A - lambda I) = 0 text for some A in U.
$$

Then either all elements of $U$ have an identical spectrum, or $S_U = Bbb C$.




Is this correct? Some simple examples of each case: for any fixed $lambda_i$,
$$
U_1 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&t\0&lambda_2: t in Bbb Cright, quad
U_2 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&0\0&t: t in Bbb Cright.
$$

Clearly, $S_U_1 = lambda_1,lambda_2$ and $S_U_2 = Bbb C$. Are there any other possibilities? I suspect that there is a quick algebraic-geometry approach here that I am missing.




An aside: I would also be interested in the case of real affine subspaces of $Bbb C^n times n$, if anyone has insights on what the possibilities are there. Note that the symmetric real matrices are an example of a subspace where we attain $S_U^(Bbb R) = Bbb R subsetneq Bbb C$. We can clearly attain any "line" in $Bbb C$, but I wonder if there are other possibilities.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



















    5















    $begingroup$


    I conjecture the following:




    Let $U subset Bbb C^n times n$ be an affine subspace, and let $S_U$ denote the "spectrum of $U$", that is
    $$
    S_U = lambda in Bbb C : det(A - lambda I) = 0 text for some A in U.
    $$

    Then either all elements of $U$ have an identical spectrum, or $S_U = Bbb C$.




    Is this correct? Some simple examples of each case: for any fixed $lambda_i$,
    $$
    U_1 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&t\0&lambda_2: t in Bbb Cright, quad
    U_2 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&0\0&t: t in Bbb Cright.
    $$

    Clearly, $S_U_1 = lambda_1,lambda_2$ and $S_U_2 = Bbb C$. Are there any other possibilities? I suspect that there is a quick algebraic-geometry approach here that I am missing.




    An aside: I would also be interested in the case of real affine subspaces of $Bbb C^n times n$, if anyone has insights on what the possibilities are there. Note that the symmetric real matrices are an example of a subspace where we attain $S_U^(Bbb R) = Bbb R subsetneq Bbb C$. We can clearly attain any "line" in $Bbb C$, but I wonder if there are other possibilities.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$

















      5













      5









      5





      $begingroup$


      I conjecture the following:




      Let $U subset Bbb C^n times n$ be an affine subspace, and let $S_U$ denote the "spectrum of $U$", that is
      $$
      S_U = lambda in Bbb C : det(A - lambda I) = 0 text for some A in U.
      $$

      Then either all elements of $U$ have an identical spectrum, or $S_U = Bbb C$.




      Is this correct? Some simple examples of each case: for any fixed $lambda_i$,
      $$
      U_1 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&t\0&lambda_2: t in Bbb Cright, quad
      U_2 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&0\0&t: t in Bbb Cright.
      $$

      Clearly, $S_U_1 = lambda_1,lambda_2$ and $S_U_2 = Bbb C$. Are there any other possibilities? I suspect that there is a quick algebraic-geometry approach here that I am missing.




      An aside: I would also be interested in the case of real affine subspaces of $Bbb C^n times n$, if anyone has insights on what the possibilities are there. Note that the symmetric real matrices are an example of a subspace where we attain $S_U^(Bbb R) = Bbb R subsetneq Bbb C$. We can clearly attain any "line" in $Bbb C$, but I wonder if there are other possibilities.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I conjecture the following:




      Let $U subset Bbb C^n times n$ be an affine subspace, and let $S_U$ denote the "spectrum of $U$", that is
      $$
      S_U = lambda in Bbb C : det(A - lambda I) = 0 text for some A in U.
      $$

      Then either all elements of $U$ have an identical spectrum, or $S_U = Bbb C$.




      Is this correct? Some simple examples of each case: for any fixed $lambda_i$,
      $$
      U_1 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&t\0&lambda_2: t in Bbb Cright, quad
      U_2 = leftpmatrixlambda_1&0\0&t: t in Bbb Cright.
      $$

      Clearly, $S_U_1 = lambda_1,lambda_2$ and $S_U_2 = Bbb C$. Are there any other possibilities? I suspect that there is a quick algebraic-geometry approach here that I am missing.




      An aside: I would also be interested in the case of real affine subspaces of $Bbb C^n times n$, if anyone has insights on what the possibilities are there. Note that the symmetric real matrices are an example of a subspace where we attain $S_U^(Bbb R) = Bbb R subsetneq Bbb C$. We can clearly attain any "line" in $Bbb C$, but I wonder if there are other possibilities.







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 18 at 15:51









      OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom

      2471 silver badge8 bronze badges




      2471 silver badge8 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3

















          $begingroup$

          To expand on Christian Remling's answer a bit: in his example, setting $det(A(t) - lambda) = 0$ becomes $(1-lambda)t+lambda^3=0$, and solving for $t$ gives $t = x^3/(x-1)$ -- so for any $lambda in mathbbC$, we have $x in S$ by choosing this $t$, with the exception of $lambda=1$.



          In general for an affine subspace of dimension $d$, we can define the space by $A(t_1,t_2,dots t_d)$, and all entries in $A$ are linear in the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t) - lambda)$ is an $n$th degree polynomial in all the $t_i$ and $lambda$. It is possible that the determinant has no dependence on any $t_i$, in which case we have a finite spectrum. Otherwise, we have a dependence on the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t)-lambda)=0$ has a solution in $t_1$ whenever at least one of the non-constant coefficients is nonzero. (In the above example, as long as the linear coefficient $1-lambdaneq 0$.) Since the leading coefficient (that is not a constant 0 polynomial) is an $n-1$th degree polynomial in $lambda$, it is zero at a most $n-1$ different places, and this is at most $n-1$ places that the spectrum can fail to be continuous. The spectrum only fails to be continuous when all of the coefficients in the $t_1$ polynomial are zero, so this is an upper bound. So, theorem:



          For an affine subspace of $ntimes n$ matrices, the spectrum is either finite (of size at most $n$), or it is $mathbbCsetminus K$, where $K$ is a finite set of exceptions (of size at most $n-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Excellent! Thank you for a clear and thorough answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:01


















          6

















          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Consider
          $$
          A(t) = beginpmatrix 0 & t & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 & 0
          endpmatrix .
          $$

          Then $det (A(t)+1) = 1$, so $-1notin S$, but clearly the spectrum of $A(t)$ is not constant (for example, $0$ is in the spectrum if and only if $t=0$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the example, I guess sometimes $2times 2$ isn't big enough :P
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:06










          • $begingroup$
            Actually @Omnomnomnom, $2times 2$ can be enough. Consider [[t 1] [1 0]], which spectrum $mathbbCsetminus0$. :) For any t, having an eigenvalue of 0 would imply a determinant of 0, but the determinant of that matrix is always -1.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Meiburg
            Sep 19 at 8:29











          • $begingroup$
            @AlexMeiburg Nice one, guess I really had no excuse here then
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 8:34












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );














          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341924%2fspectrum-of-a-subspace-of-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown


























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3

















          $begingroup$

          To expand on Christian Remling's answer a bit: in his example, setting $det(A(t) - lambda) = 0$ becomes $(1-lambda)t+lambda^3=0$, and solving for $t$ gives $t = x^3/(x-1)$ -- so for any $lambda in mathbbC$, we have $x in S$ by choosing this $t$, with the exception of $lambda=1$.



          In general for an affine subspace of dimension $d$, we can define the space by $A(t_1,t_2,dots t_d)$, and all entries in $A$ are linear in the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t) - lambda)$ is an $n$th degree polynomial in all the $t_i$ and $lambda$. It is possible that the determinant has no dependence on any $t_i$, in which case we have a finite spectrum. Otherwise, we have a dependence on the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t)-lambda)=0$ has a solution in $t_1$ whenever at least one of the non-constant coefficients is nonzero. (In the above example, as long as the linear coefficient $1-lambdaneq 0$.) Since the leading coefficient (that is not a constant 0 polynomial) is an $n-1$th degree polynomial in $lambda$, it is zero at a most $n-1$ different places, and this is at most $n-1$ places that the spectrum can fail to be continuous. The spectrum only fails to be continuous when all of the coefficients in the $t_1$ polynomial are zero, so this is an upper bound. So, theorem:



          For an affine subspace of $ntimes n$ matrices, the spectrum is either finite (of size at most $n$), or it is $mathbbCsetminus K$, where $K$ is a finite set of exceptions (of size at most $n-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Excellent! Thank you for a clear and thorough answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:01















          3

















          $begingroup$

          To expand on Christian Remling's answer a bit: in his example, setting $det(A(t) - lambda) = 0$ becomes $(1-lambda)t+lambda^3=0$, and solving for $t$ gives $t = x^3/(x-1)$ -- so for any $lambda in mathbbC$, we have $x in S$ by choosing this $t$, with the exception of $lambda=1$.



          In general for an affine subspace of dimension $d$, we can define the space by $A(t_1,t_2,dots t_d)$, and all entries in $A$ are linear in the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t) - lambda)$ is an $n$th degree polynomial in all the $t_i$ and $lambda$. It is possible that the determinant has no dependence on any $t_i$, in which case we have a finite spectrum. Otherwise, we have a dependence on the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t)-lambda)=0$ has a solution in $t_1$ whenever at least one of the non-constant coefficients is nonzero. (In the above example, as long as the linear coefficient $1-lambdaneq 0$.) Since the leading coefficient (that is not a constant 0 polynomial) is an $n-1$th degree polynomial in $lambda$, it is zero at a most $n-1$ different places, and this is at most $n-1$ places that the spectrum can fail to be continuous. The spectrum only fails to be continuous when all of the coefficients in the $t_1$ polynomial are zero, so this is an upper bound. So, theorem:



          For an affine subspace of $ntimes n$ matrices, the spectrum is either finite (of size at most $n$), or it is $mathbbCsetminus K$, where $K$ is a finite set of exceptions (of size at most $n-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Excellent! Thank you for a clear and thorough answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:01













          3















          3











          3







          $begingroup$

          To expand on Christian Remling's answer a bit: in his example, setting $det(A(t) - lambda) = 0$ becomes $(1-lambda)t+lambda^3=0$, and solving for $t$ gives $t = x^3/(x-1)$ -- so for any $lambda in mathbbC$, we have $x in S$ by choosing this $t$, with the exception of $lambda=1$.



          In general for an affine subspace of dimension $d$, we can define the space by $A(t_1,t_2,dots t_d)$, and all entries in $A$ are linear in the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t) - lambda)$ is an $n$th degree polynomial in all the $t_i$ and $lambda$. It is possible that the determinant has no dependence on any $t_i$, in which case we have a finite spectrum. Otherwise, we have a dependence on the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t)-lambda)=0$ has a solution in $t_1$ whenever at least one of the non-constant coefficients is nonzero. (In the above example, as long as the linear coefficient $1-lambdaneq 0$.) Since the leading coefficient (that is not a constant 0 polynomial) is an $n-1$th degree polynomial in $lambda$, it is zero at a most $n-1$ different places, and this is at most $n-1$ places that the spectrum can fail to be continuous. The spectrum only fails to be continuous when all of the coefficients in the $t_1$ polynomial are zero, so this is an upper bound. So, theorem:



          For an affine subspace of $ntimes n$ matrices, the spectrum is either finite (of size at most $n$), or it is $mathbbCsetminus K$, where $K$ is a finite set of exceptions (of size at most $n-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$



          To expand on Christian Remling's answer a bit: in his example, setting $det(A(t) - lambda) = 0$ becomes $(1-lambda)t+lambda^3=0$, and solving for $t$ gives $t = x^3/(x-1)$ -- so for any $lambda in mathbbC$, we have $x in S$ by choosing this $t$, with the exception of $lambda=1$.



          In general for an affine subspace of dimension $d$, we can define the space by $A(t_1,t_2,dots t_d)$, and all entries in $A$ are linear in the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t) - lambda)$ is an $n$th degree polynomial in all the $t_i$ and $lambda$. It is possible that the determinant has no dependence on any $t_i$, in which case we have a finite spectrum. Otherwise, we have a dependence on the $t_i$. Then $det(A(t)-lambda)=0$ has a solution in $t_1$ whenever at least one of the non-constant coefficients is nonzero. (In the above example, as long as the linear coefficient $1-lambdaneq 0$.) Since the leading coefficient (that is not a constant 0 polynomial) is an $n-1$th degree polynomial in $lambda$, it is zero at a most $n-1$ different places, and this is at most $n-1$ places that the spectrum can fail to be continuous. The spectrum only fails to be continuous when all of the coefficients in the $t_1$ polynomial are zero, so this is an upper bound. So, theorem:



          For an affine subspace of $ntimes n$ matrices, the spectrum is either finite (of size at most $n$), or it is $mathbbCsetminus K$, where $K$ is a finite set of exceptions (of size at most $n-1$).







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer




          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 18 at 19:54









          Alex MeiburgAlex Meiburg

          8413 silver badges13 bronze badges




          8413 silver badges13 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Excellent! Thank you for a clear and thorough answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:01
















          • $begingroup$
            Excellent! Thank you for a clear and thorough answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:01















          $begingroup$
          Excellent! Thank you for a clear and thorough answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Sep 19 at 3:01




          $begingroup$
          Excellent! Thank you for a clear and thorough answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Sep 19 at 3:01











          6

















          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Consider
          $$
          A(t) = beginpmatrix 0 & t & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 & 0
          endpmatrix .
          $$

          Then $det (A(t)+1) = 1$, so $-1notin S$, but clearly the spectrum of $A(t)$ is not constant (for example, $0$ is in the spectrum if and only if $t=0$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the example, I guess sometimes $2times 2$ isn't big enough :P
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:06










          • $begingroup$
            Actually @Omnomnomnom, $2times 2$ can be enough. Consider [[t 1] [1 0]], which spectrum $mathbbCsetminus0$. :) For any t, having an eigenvalue of 0 would imply a determinant of 0, but the determinant of that matrix is always -1.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Meiburg
            Sep 19 at 8:29











          • $begingroup$
            @AlexMeiburg Nice one, guess I really had no excuse here then
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 8:34















          6

















          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Consider
          $$
          A(t) = beginpmatrix 0 & t & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 & 0
          endpmatrix .
          $$

          Then $det (A(t)+1) = 1$, so $-1notin S$, but clearly the spectrum of $A(t)$ is not constant (for example, $0$ is in the spectrum if and only if $t=0$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the example, I guess sometimes $2times 2$ isn't big enough :P
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:06










          • $begingroup$
            Actually @Omnomnomnom, $2times 2$ can be enough. Consider [[t 1] [1 0]], which spectrum $mathbbCsetminus0$. :) For any t, having an eigenvalue of 0 would imply a determinant of 0, but the determinant of that matrix is always -1.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Meiburg
            Sep 19 at 8:29











          • $begingroup$
            @AlexMeiburg Nice one, guess I really had no excuse here then
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 8:34













          6















          6











          6







          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Consider
          $$
          A(t) = beginpmatrix 0 & t & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 & 0
          endpmatrix .
          $$

          Then $det (A(t)+1) = 1$, so $-1notin S$, but clearly the spectrum of $A(t)$ is not constant (for example, $0$ is in the spectrum if and only if $t=0$).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$



          This is not true. Consider
          $$
          A(t) = beginpmatrix 0 & t & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 & 0
          endpmatrix .
          $$

          Then $det (A(t)+1) = 1$, so $-1notin S$, but clearly the spectrum of $A(t)$ is not constant (for example, $0$ is in the spectrum if and only if $t=0$).







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer




          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 18 at 18:27









          Christian RemlingChristian Remling

          13.3k2 gold badges24 silver badges45 bronze badges




          13.3k2 gold badges24 silver badges45 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the example, I guess sometimes $2times 2$ isn't big enough :P
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:06










          • $begingroup$
            Actually @Omnomnomnom, $2times 2$ can be enough. Consider [[t 1] [1 0]], which spectrum $mathbbCsetminus0$. :) For any t, having an eigenvalue of 0 would imply a determinant of 0, but the determinant of that matrix is always -1.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Meiburg
            Sep 19 at 8:29











          • $begingroup$
            @AlexMeiburg Nice one, guess I really had no excuse here then
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 8:34
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the example, I guess sometimes $2times 2$ isn't big enough :P
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 3:06










          • $begingroup$
            Actually @Omnomnomnom, $2times 2$ can be enough. Consider [[t 1] [1 0]], which spectrum $mathbbCsetminus0$. :) For any t, having an eigenvalue of 0 would imply a determinant of 0, but the determinant of that matrix is always -1.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Meiburg
            Sep 19 at 8:29











          • $begingroup$
            @AlexMeiburg Nice one, guess I really had no excuse here then
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Sep 19 at 8:34















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for the example, I guess sometimes $2times 2$ isn't big enough :P
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Sep 19 at 3:06




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for the example, I guess sometimes $2times 2$ isn't big enough :P
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Sep 19 at 3:06












          $begingroup$
          Actually @Omnomnomnom, $2times 2$ can be enough. Consider [[t 1] [1 0]], which spectrum $mathbbCsetminus0$. :) For any t, having an eigenvalue of 0 would imply a determinant of 0, but the determinant of that matrix is always -1.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex Meiburg
          Sep 19 at 8:29





          $begingroup$
          Actually @Omnomnomnom, $2times 2$ can be enough. Consider [[t 1] [1 0]], which spectrum $mathbbCsetminus0$. :) For any t, having an eigenvalue of 0 would imply a determinant of 0, but the determinant of that matrix is always -1.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex Meiburg
          Sep 19 at 8:29













          $begingroup$
          @AlexMeiburg Nice one, guess I really had no excuse here then
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Sep 19 at 8:34




          $begingroup$
          @AlexMeiburg Nice one, guess I really had no excuse here then
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Sep 19 at 8:34


















          draft saved

          draft discarded















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341924%2fspectrum-of-a-subspace-of-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown









          Popular posts from this blog

          Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

          Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

          Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?