Wired to Wireless DoorbellHow to add wireless capabilities to a doorbell button?Diagnosing a doorbell faultConnecting the motor to 12/2 wire and a 6 position dial in an evaporative swamp coolerDouble Doorbell?Moving a doorbell transformerDoor bell partially rings randomly since Nest doorbell installationDoorbell wiringIs my 4-way switch replacement job safe and up to code?What options do I have to replace a failed service panel?
Present value heuristics problem
Enumeration with direct and indirect properties
truck makes a tapping/knocking sound only happen the first start of the day and stops after truck is warm
Employer wants me to do something explicitly illegal
Got $2 in the mail from the Pew Research Center, is this a scam?
How should I handle cases like this where the documentation for Bitcoin Core states one thing, and the actual program does something else?
Is there a theory challenging the "strict" distinction between Thai and Vietnamese?
Did the US embassy in Kyiv resist hanging Trump's picture while Yovanovitch was ambassador?
Are there any exemplars of the 'trope of the exiled poet' prior to CE 8?
Do the hole patterns drilled in laps really help ensure uniform expansion and contraction?
Why didn't Philippine Airlines 113 dump fuel prior to forced landing?
How can I see Explorer.exe's frames per second?
Because things smell, is everything evaporating?
Why would Earth be long-term unsuitable for an advanced alien species that's already colonized it?
How to delete my name and initials from the title bar of Microsoft Word
What was Jeremy Corbyn’s involvement in the Northern Ireland peace process?
Peaceable Bishops on an 8x8 grid
Is there no way in Windows 10 to type the Euro symbol € on a US English keyboard that has neither numeric keypad nor "alt gr" key?
Why do laptop batteries have so many terminals?
Messed up my .bash_profile remotely, can't ssh back in
Can I call the airport to see if my boyfriend made it through customs?
Banking system in C++
Center a DIV unequally using CSS
How often are there lunar eclipses on Jupiter
Wired to Wireless Doorbell
How to add wireless capabilities to a doorbell button?Diagnosing a doorbell faultConnecting the motor to 12/2 wire and a 6 position dial in an evaporative swamp coolerDouble Doorbell?Moving a doorbell transformerDoor bell partially rings randomly since Nest doorbell installationDoorbell wiringIs my 4-way switch replacement job safe and up to code?What options do I have to replace a failed service panel?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I am looking at replacing my doorbell (original to the house, circa 1978) with something more modern looking. Now, the problem I have is that most of the modern doorbells are wireless. Mine is wired...and I can't find any information about terminating the power to the doorbell and ideally burying it in the wall to be forgotten about. Is this possible? Or if it isn't what are feasible, ethical and non-burn my house down options?
electrical doorbell canada
add a comment
|
I am looking at replacing my doorbell (original to the house, circa 1978) with something more modern looking. Now, the problem I have is that most of the modern doorbells are wireless. Mine is wired...and I can't find any information about terminating the power to the doorbell and ideally burying it in the wall to be forgotten about. Is this possible? Or if it isn't what are feasible, ethical and non-burn my house down options?
electrical doorbell canada
add a comment
|
I am looking at replacing my doorbell (original to the house, circa 1978) with something more modern looking. Now, the problem I have is that most of the modern doorbells are wireless. Mine is wired...and I can't find any information about terminating the power to the doorbell and ideally burying it in the wall to be forgotten about. Is this possible? Or if it isn't what are feasible, ethical and non-burn my house down options?
electrical doorbell canada
I am looking at replacing my doorbell (original to the house, circa 1978) with something more modern looking. Now, the problem I have is that most of the modern doorbells are wireless. Mine is wired...and I can't find any information about terminating the power to the doorbell and ideally burying it in the wall to be forgotten about. Is this possible? Or if it isn't what are feasible, ethical and non-burn my house down options?
electrical doorbell canada
electrical doorbell canada
asked Sep 17 at 20:27
J CrosbyJ Crosby
3611 silver badge16 bronze badges
3611 silver badge16 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Don‘t tear the wires out
Some newer doorbells are going wireless. But this is not a universal trend. Better doorbells are actually wired, because they do things that take power. They are lighted (like, the button glows), they have cameras or WiFi, motion sensors, microphones, speakers, etc. Those things are not possible on battery.
Also, the wireless doorbells I have seen are not well built, and don't last. I would expect quality ones to work both wired or wireless.
It would be silly to, a few years later, pay an electrician to re-run the wires... Or have to forego a nice doorbell because of no wires.
In other words, I think "wireless" is a fad.
I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them. The other end will be the chime, and it's quite likely the transformer is near that. Sometimes, doorbells coattail on the furnace/thermostat transformer.
7
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and insulate them
– Alexander
Sep 18 at 5:35
If you want to add a doorbell to a Victorian house (which would originally have been fitted with a door knocker or a an actual bell hanging by the door), a wireless doorbell is very useful indeed (and avoids having to try and run power to the doorbell). I don't think they are a fad - but they probably are rather niche.
– Martin Bonner supports Monica
Sep 18 at 8:58
2
The big advantage of a wireless doorbell is lower installation cost if you don't happen to have compatible wiring already in place where you need it. That doesn't just apply to old houses, like @MartinBonner mentions, but to any situation where you might want to add a doorbell where there wasn't one before. As it makes no sense to pay $100 (on top of the cost of the bell itself) to have a wired doorbell installed, when you can buy a wireless one for $10 and install it yourself in minutes, most cheap doorbells sold directly to consumers are likely to stay wireless for the foreseeable future.
– Ilmari Karonen
Sep 18 at 12:41
3
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and make sure to keep them from falling into the wall cavity.
– stannius
Sep 18 at 17:41
2
@JCrosby A lot of wireless kits seem to come with 2 receivers, which only reinforces my agreement with Harper about their quality/longevity. A good SINGLE wireless receiver should be able to support two transmitters all on its own, there's no reason you should need a second receiver just to add a side-door bell. (Heck, our wired door chime growing up took two inputs, with distinct tones.) These dual-receiver packages (typically with only a single transmitter) tell me A: they're cheap throwaway hardware, and B: they're not loud enough for one chime to cover a reasonable-sized dwelling.
– FeRD
Sep 19 at 7:56
|
show 1 more comment
Those wires going to your doorbell button hook up to a transformer somewhere. Maybe it's behind your chime, or maybe its in the attic, but it's there somewhere. Find the transformer and completely disconnect it (but leave it there in case anyone wants to hook it up again), and then you can bury the doorbell wires in the wall. Again, try to make the wires accessible even if you tie a string onto them in case someone else needs it later.
If you can't find the transformer, you can cap off the doorbell wires with wire nuts, but that transformer is going to still be live in the house somewhere using a small amount of power. Not really recommended.
1
Gotcha! In essence - find and disconnect completely the transformer - even if it becomes a real crappy game of "where's waldo".
– J Crosby
Sep 17 at 20:34
3
@JCrosby, right - the low voltage isn't going to hurt anything or start a fire, but if the wires do get shorted out it could make the transformer heat up and burn out. Might be a where's waldo, but really should be done.
– JPhi1618
Sep 17 at 20:36
1
Quite likely the transformer is right next to the chime. It's not that hard to follow the sound, yes?
– Harper - Reinstate Monica
Sep 17 at 22:12
2
@Harper, maybe likely in your hood, but in mine they are all in the attic...
– Jimmy Fix-it
Sep 18 at 1:00
4
My transformer is right next to my fuse box, YMMV
– Cinderhaze
Sep 18 at 16:27
add a comment
|
There are "wireless" doorbells that can actually take power from the low voltage doorbell wiring, though you may need to adjust the wiring to make it a power delivery circuit instead of a "short-circuit to ring" circuit.
These have the advantage that you don't have to worry about charging the battery every so often.
add a comment
|
To power the wired doorbell, there will be a transformer that converts the house voltage to a lower voltage. To decomission the wiring you'll have to find that transformer and remove it.
The other option would be to cap them off and leave them inside the box of the new doorbell. That lets you or a future homeowner use them in the future.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "73"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174607%2fwired-to-wireless-doorbell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Don‘t tear the wires out
Some newer doorbells are going wireless. But this is not a universal trend. Better doorbells are actually wired, because they do things that take power. They are lighted (like, the button glows), they have cameras or WiFi, motion sensors, microphones, speakers, etc. Those things are not possible on battery.
Also, the wireless doorbells I have seen are not well built, and don't last. I would expect quality ones to work both wired or wireless.
It would be silly to, a few years later, pay an electrician to re-run the wires... Or have to forego a nice doorbell because of no wires.
In other words, I think "wireless" is a fad.
I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them. The other end will be the chime, and it's quite likely the transformer is near that. Sometimes, doorbells coattail on the furnace/thermostat transformer.
7
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and insulate them
– Alexander
Sep 18 at 5:35
If you want to add a doorbell to a Victorian house (which would originally have been fitted with a door knocker or a an actual bell hanging by the door), a wireless doorbell is very useful indeed (and avoids having to try and run power to the doorbell). I don't think they are a fad - but they probably are rather niche.
– Martin Bonner supports Monica
Sep 18 at 8:58
2
The big advantage of a wireless doorbell is lower installation cost if you don't happen to have compatible wiring already in place where you need it. That doesn't just apply to old houses, like @MartinBonner mentions, but to any situation where you might want to add a doorbell where there wasn't one before. As it makes no sense to pay $100 (on top of the cost of the bell itself) to have a wired doorbell installed, when you can buy a wireless one for $10 and install it yourself in minutes, most cheap doorbells sold directly to consumers are likely to stay wireless for the foreseeable future.
– Ilmari Karonen
Sep 18 at 12:41
3
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and make sure to keep them from falling into the wall cavity.
– stannius
Sep 18 at 17:41
2
@JCrosby A lot of wireless kits seem to come with 2 receivers, which only reinforces my agreement with Harper about their quality/longevity. A good SINGLE wireless receiver should be able to support two transmitters all on its own, there's no reason you should need a second receiver just to add a side-door bell. (Heck, our wired door chime growing up took two inputs, with distinct tones.) These dual-receiver packages (typically with only a single transmitter) tell me A: they're cheap throwaway hardware, and B: they're not loud enough for one chime to cover a reasonable-sized dwelling.
– FeRD
Sep 19 at 7:56
|
show 1 more comment
Don‘t tear the wires out
Some newer doorbells are going wireless. But this is not a universal trend. Better doorbells are actually wired, because they do things that take power. They are lighted (like, the button glows), they have cameras or WiFi, motion sensors, microphones, speakers, etc. Those things are not possible on battery.
Also, the wireless doorbells I have seen are not well built, and don't last. I would expect quality ones to work both wired or wireless.
It would be silly to, a few years later, pay an electrician to re-run the wires... Or have to forego a nice doorbell because of no wires.
In other words, I think "wireless" is a fad.
I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them. The other end will be the chime, and it's quite likely the transformer is near that. Sometimes, doorbells coattail on the furnace/thermostat transformer.
7
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and insulate them
– Alexander
Sep 18 at 5:35
If you want to add a doorbell to a Victorian house (which would originally have been fitted with a door knocker or a an actual bell hanging by the door), a wireless doorbell is very useful indeed (and avoids having to try and run power to the doorbell). I don't think they are a fad - but they probably are rather niche.
– Martin Bonner supports Monica
Sep 18 at 8:58
2
The big advantage of a wireless doorbell is lower installation cost if you don't happen to have compatible wiring already in place where you need it. That doesn't just apply to old houses, like @MartinBonner mentions, but to any situation where you might want to add a doorbell where there wasn't one before. As it makes no sense to pay $100 (on top of the cost of the bell itself) to have a wired doorbell installed, when you can buy a wireless one for $10 and install it yourself in minutes, most cheap doorbells sold directly to consumers are likely to stay wireless for the foreseeable future.
– Ilmari Karonen
Sep 18 at 12:41
3
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and make sure to keep them from falling into the wall cavity.
– stannius
Sep 18 at 17:41
2
@JCrosby A lot of wireless kits seem to come with 2 receivers, which only reinforces my agreement with Harper about their quality/longevity. A good SINGLE wireless receiver should be able to support two transmitters all on its own, there's no reason you should need a second receiver just to add a side-door bell. (Heck, our wired door chime growing up took two inputs, with distinct tones.) These dual-receiver packages (typically with only a single transmitter) tell me A: they're cheap throwaway hardware, and B: they're not loud enough for one chime to cover a reasonable-sized dwelling.
– FeRD
Sep 19 at 7:56
|
show 1 more comment
Don‘t tear the wires out
Some newer doorbells are going wireless. But this is not a universal trend. Better doorbells are actually wired, because they do things that take power. They are lighted (like, the button glows), they have cameras or WiFi, motion sensors, microphones, speakers, etc. Those things are not possible on battery.
Also, the wireless doorbells I have seen are not well built, and don't last. I would expect quality ones to work both wired or wireless.
It would be silly to, a few years later, pay an electrician to re-run the wires... Or have to forego a nice doorbell because of no wires.
In other words, I think "wireless" is a fad.
I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them. The other end will be the chime, and it's quite likely the transformer is near that. Sometimes, doorbells coattail on the furnace/thermostat transformer.
Don‘t tear the wires out
Some newer doorbells are going wireless. But this is not a universal trend. Better doorbells are actually wired, because they do things that take power. They are lighted (like, the button glows), they have cameras or WiFi, motion sensors, microphones, speakers, etc. Those things are not possible on battery.
Also, the wireless doorbells I have seen are not well built, and don't last. I would expect quality ones to work both wired or wireless.
It would be silly to, a few years later, pay an electrician to re-run the wires... Or have to forego a nice doorbell because of no wires.
In other words, I think "wireless" is a fad.
I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them. The other end will be the chime, and it's quite likely the transformer is near that. Sometimes, doorbells coattail on the furnace/thermostat transformer.
answered Sep 17 at 22:11
Harper - Reinstate MonicaHarper - Reinstate Monica
108k7 gold badges82 silver badges241 bronze badges
108k7 gold badges82 silver badges241 bronze badges
7
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and insulate them
– Alexander
Sep 18 at 5:35
If you want to add a doorbell to a Victorian house (which would originally have been fitted with a door knocker or a an actual bell hanging by the door), a wireless doorbell is very useful indeed (and avoids having to try and run power to the doorbell). I don't think they are a fad - but they probably are rather niche.
– Martin Bonner supports Monica
Sep 18 at 8:58
2
The big advantage of a wireless doorbell is lower installation cost if you don't happen to have compatible wiring already in place where you need it. That doesn't just apply to old houses, like @MartinBonner mentions, but to any situation where you might want to add a doorbell where there wasn't one before. As it makes no sense to pay $100 (on top of the cost of the bell itself) to have a wired doorbell installed, when you can buy a wireless one for $10 and install it yourself in minutes, most cheap doorbells sold directly to consumers are likely to stay wireless for the foreseeable future.
– Ilmari Karonen
Sep 18 at 12:41
3
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and make sure to keep them from falling into the wall cavity.
– stannius
Sep 18 at 17:41
2
@JCrosby A lot of wireless kits seem to come with 2 receivers, which only reinforces my agreement with Harper about their quality/longevity. A good SINGLE wireless receiver should be able to support two transmitters all on its own, there's no reason you should need a second receiver just to add a side-door bell. (Heck, our wired door chime growing up took two inputs, with distinct tones.) These dual-receiver packages (typically with only a single transmitter) tell me A: they're cheap throwaway hardware, and B: they're not loud enough for one chime to cover a reasonable-sized dwelling.
– FeRD
Sep 19 at 7:56
|
show 1 more comment
7
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and insulate them
– Alexander
Sep 18 at 5:35
If you want to add a doorbell to a Victorian house (which would originally have been fitted with a door knocker or a an actual bell hanging by the door), a wireless doorbell is very useful indeed (and avoids having to try and run power to the doorbell). I don't think they are a fad - but they probably are rather niche.
– Martin Bonner supports Monica
Sep 18 at 8:58
2
The big advantage of a wireless doorbell is lower installation cost if you don't happen to have compatible wiring already in place where you need it. That doesn't just apply to old houses, like @MartinBonner mentions, but to any situation where you might want to add a doorbell where there wasn't one before. As it makes no sense to pay $100 (on top of the cost of the bell itself) to have a wired doorbell installed, when you can buy a wireless one for $10 and install it yourself in minutes, most cheap doorbells sold directly to consumers are likely to stay wireless for the foreseeable future.
– Ilmari Karonen
Sep 18 at 12:41
3
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and make sure to keep them from falling into the wall cavity.
– stannius
Sep 18 at 17:41
2
@JCrosby A lot of wireless kits seem to come with 2 receivers, which only reinforces my agreement with Harper about their quality/longevity. A good SINGLE wireless receiver should be able to support two transmitters all on its own, there's no reason you should need a second receiver just to add a side-door bell. (Heck, our wired door chime growing up took two inputs, with distinct tones.) These dual-receiver packages (typically with only a single transmitter) tell me A: they're cheap throwaway hardware, and B: they're not loud enough for one chime to cover a reasonable-sized dwelling.
– FeRD
Sep 19 at 7:56
7
7
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and insulate them
– Alexander
Sep 18 at 5:35
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and insulate them
– Alexander
Sep 18 at 5:35
If you want to add a doorbell to a Victorian house (which would originally have been fitted with a door knocker or a an actual bell hanging by the door), a wireless doorbell is very useful indeed (and avoids having to try and run power to the doorbell). I don't think they are a fad - but they probably are rather niche.
– Martin Bonner supports Monica
Sep 18 at 8:58
If you want to add a doorbell to a Victorian house (which would originally have been fitted with a door knocker or a an actual bell hanging by the door), a wireless doorbell is very useful indeed (and avoids having to try and run power to the doorbell). I don't think they are a fad - but they probably are rather niche.
– Martin Bonner supports Monica
Sep 18 at 8:58
2
2
The big advantage of a wireless doorbell is lower installation cost if you don't happen to have compatible wiring already in place where you need it. That doesn't just apply to old houses, like @MartinBonner mentions, but to any situation where you might want to add a doorbell where there wasn't one before. As it makes no sense to pay $100 (on top of the cost of the bell itself) to have a wired doorbell installed, when you can buy a wireless one for $10 and install it yourself in minutes, most cheap doorbells sold directly to consumers are likely to stay wireless for the foreseeable future.
– Ilmari Karonen
Sep 18 at 12:41
The big advantage of a wireless doorbell is lower installation cost if you don't happen to have compatible wiring already in place where you need it. That doesn't just apply to old houses, like @MartinBonner mentions, but to any situation where you might want to add a doorbell where there wasn't one before. As it makes no sense to pay $100 (on top of the cost of the bell itself) to have a wired doorbell installed, when you can buy a wireless one for $10 and install it yourself in minutes, most cheap doorbells sold directly to consumers are likely to stay wireless for the foreseeable future.
– Ilmari Karonen
Sep 18 at 12:41
3
3
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and make sure to keep them from falling into the wall cavity.
– stannius
Sep 18 at 17:41
"I would simply disconnect the wires at both ends without cutting or damaging them" -> and make sure to keep them from falling into the wall cavity.
– stannius
Sep 18 at 17:41
2
2
@JCrosby A lot of wireless kits seem to come with 2 receivers, which only reinforces my agreement with Harper about their quality/longevity. A good SINGLE wireless receiver should be able to support two transmitters all on its own, there's no reason you should need a second receiver just to add a side-door bell. (Heck, our wired door chime growing up took two inputs, with distinct tones.) These dual-receiver packages (typically with only a single transmitter) tell me A: they're cheap throwaway hardware, and B: they're not loud enough for one chime to cover a reasonable-sized dwelling.
– FeRD
Sep 19 at 7:56
@JCrosby A lot of wireless kits seem to come with 2 receivers, which only reinforces my agreement with Harper about their quality/longevity. A good SINGLE wireless receiver should be able to support two transmitters all on its own, there's no reason you should need a second receiver just to add a side-door bell. (Heck, our wired door chime growing up took two inputs, with distinct tones.) These dual-receiver packages (typically with only a single transmitter) tell me A: they're cheap throwaway hardware, and B: they're not loud enough for one chime to cover a reasonable-sized dwelling.
– FeRD
Sep 19 at 7:56
|
show 1 more comment
Those wires going to your doorbell button hook up to a transformer somewhere. Maybe it's behind your chime, or maybe its in the attic, but it's there somewhere. Find the transformer and completely disconnect it (but leave it there in case anyone wants to hook it up again), and then you can bury the doorbell wires in the wall. Again, try to make the wires accessible even if you tie a string onto them in case someone else needs it later.
If you can't find the transformer, you can cap off the doorbell wires with wire nuts, but that transformer is going to still be live in the house somewhere using a small amount of power. Not really recommended.
1
Gotcha! In essence - find and disconnect completely the transformer - even if it becomes a real crappy game of "where's waldo".
– J Crosby
Sep 17 at 20:34
3
@JCrosby, right - the low voltage isn't going to hurt anything or start a fire, but if the wires do get shorted out it could make the transformer heat up and burn out. Might be a where's waldo, but really should be done.
– JPhi1618
Sep 17 at 20:36
1
Quite likely the transformer is right next to the chime. It's not that hard to follow the sound, yes?
– Harper - Reinstate Monica
Sep 17 at 22:12
2
@Harper, maybe likely in your hood, but in mine they are all in the attic...
– Jimmy Fix-it
Sep 18 at 1:00
4
My transformer is right next to my fuse box, YMMV
– Cinderhaze
Sep 18 at 16:27
add a comment
|
Those wires going to your doorbell button hook up to a transformer somewhere. Maybe it's behind your chime, or maybe its in the attic, but it's there somewhere. Find the transformer and completely disconnect it (but leave it there in case anyone wants to hook it up again), and then you can bury the doorbell wires in the wall. Again, try to make the wires accessible even if you tie a string onto them in case someone else needs it later.
If you can't find the transformer, you can cap off the doorbell wires with wire nuts, but that transformer is going to still be live in the house somewhere using a small amount of power. Not really recommended.
1
Gotcha! In essence - find and disconnect completely the transformer - even if it becomes a real crappy game of "where's waldo".
– J Crosby
Sep 17 at 20:34
3
@JCrosby, right - the low voltage isn't going to hurt anything or start a fire, but if the wires do get shorted out it could make the transformer heat up and burn out. Might be a where's waldo, but really should be done.
– JPhi1618
Sep 17 at 20:36
1
Quite likely the transformer is right next to the chime. It's not that hard to follow the sound, yes?
– Harper - Reinstate Monica
Sep 17 at 22:12
2
@Harper, maybe likely in your hood, but in mine they are all in the attic...
– Jimmy Fix-it
Sep 18 at 1:00
4
My transformer is right next to my fuse box, YMMV
– Cinderhaze
Sep 18 at 16:27
add a comment
|
Those wires going to your doorbell button hook up to a transformer somewhere. Maybe it's behind your chime, or maybe its in the attic, but it's there somewhere. Find the transformer and completely disconnect it (but leave it there in case anyone wants to hook it up again), and then you can bury the doorbell wires in the wall. Again, try to make the wires accessible even if you tie a string onto them in case someone else needs it later.
If you can't find the transformer, you can cap off the doorbell wires with wire nuts, but that transformer is going to still be live in the house somewhere using a small amount of power. Not really recommended.
Those wires going to your doorbell button hook up to a transformer somewhere. Maybe it's behind your chime, or maybe its in the attic, but it's there somewhere. Find the transformer and completely disconnect it (but leave it there in case anyone wants to hook it up again), and then you can bury the doorbell wires in the wall. Again, try to make the wires accessible even if you tie a string onto them in case someone else needs it later.
If you can't find the transformer, you can cap off the doorbell wires with wire nuts, but that transformer is going to still be live in the house somewhere using a small amount of power. Not really recommended.
answered Sep 17 at 20:30
JPhi1618JPhi1618
15.7k2 gold badges31 silver badges55 bronze badges
15.7k2 gold badges31 silver badges55 bronze badges
1
Gotcha! In essence - find and disconnect completely the transformer - even if it becomes a real crappy game of "where's waldo".
– J Crosby
Sep 17 at 20:34
3
@JCrosby, right - the low voltage isn't going to hurt anything or start a fire, but if the wires do get shorted out it could make the transformer heat up and burn out. Might be a where's waldo, but really should be done.
– JPhi1618
Sep 17 at 20:36
1
Quite likely the transformer is right next to the chime. It's not that hard to follow the sound, yes?
– Harper - Reinstate Monica
Sep 17 at 22:12
2
@Harper, maybe likely in your hood, but in mine they are all in the attic...
– Jimmy Fix-it
Sep 18 at 1:00
4
My transformer is right next to my fuse box, YMMV
– Cinderhaze
Sep 18 at 16:27
add a comment
|
1
Gotcha! In essence - find and disconnect completely the transformer - even if it becomes a real crappy game of "where's waldo".
– J Crosby
Sep 17 at 20:34
3
@JCrosby, right - the low voltage isn't going to hurt anything or start a fire, but if the wires do get shorted out it could make the transformer heat up and burn out. Might be a where's waldo, but really should be done.
– JPhi1618
Sep 17 at 20:36
1
Quite likely the transformer is right next to the chime. It's not that hard to follow the sound, yes?
– Harper - Reinstate Monica
Sep 17 at 22:12
2
@Harper, maybe likely in your hood, but in mine they are all in the attic...
– Jimmy Fix-it
Sep 18 at 1:00
4
My transformer is right next to my fuse box, YMMV
– Cinderhaze
Sep 18 at 16:27
1
1
Gotcha! In essence - find and disconnect completely the transformer - even if it becomes a real crappy game of "where's waldo".
– J Crosby
Sep 17 at 20:34
Gotcha! In essence - find and disconnect completely the transformer - even if it becomes a real crappy game of "where's waldo".
– J Crosby
Sep 17 at 20:34
3
3
@JCrosby, right - the low voltage isn't going to hurt anything or start a fire, but if the wires do get shorted out it could make the transformer heat up and burn out. Might be a where's waldo, but really should be done.
– JPhi1618
Sep 17 at 20:36
@JCrosby, right - the low voltage isn't going to hurt anything or start a fire, but if the wires do get shorted out it could make the transformer heat up and burn out. Might be a where's waldo, but really should be done.
– JPhi1618
Sep 17 at 20:36
1
1
Quite likely the transformer is right next to the chime. It's not that hard to follow the sound, yes?
– Harper - Reinstate Monica
Sep 17 at 22:12
Quite likely the transformer is right next to the chime. It's not that hard to follow the sound, yes?
– Harper - Reinstate Monica
Sep 17 at 22:12
2
2
@Harper, maybe likely in your hood, but in mine they are all in the attic...
– Jimmy Fix-it
Sep 18 at 1:00
@Harper, maybe likely in your hood, but in mine they are all in the attic...
– Jimmy Fix-it
Sep 18 at 1:00
4
4
My transformer is right next to my fuse box, YMMV
– Cinderhaze
Sep 18 at 16:27
My transformer is right next to my fuse box, YMMV
– Cinderhaze
Sep 18 at 16:27
add a comment
|
There are "wireless" doorbells that can actually take power from the low voltage doorbell wiring, though you may need to adjust the wiring to make it a power delivery circuit instead of a "short-circuit to ring" circuit.
These have the advantage that you don't have to worry about charging the battery every so often.
add a comment
|
There are "wireless" doorbells that can actually take power from the low voltage doorbell wiring, though you may need to adjust the wiring to make it a power delivery circuit instead of a "short-circuit to ring" circuit.
These have the advantage that you don't have to worry about charging the battery every so often.
add a comment
|
There are "wireless" doorbells that can actually take power from the low voltage doorbell wiring, though you may need to adjust the wiring to make it a power delivery circuit instead of a "short-circuit to ring" circuit.
These have the advantage that you don't have to worry about charging the battery every so often.
There are "wireless" doorbells that can actually take power from the low voltage doorbell wiring, though you may need to adjust the wiring to make it a power delivery circuit instead of a "short-circuit to ring" circuit.
These have the advantage that you don't have to worry about charging the battery every so often.
answered Sep 18 at 8:11
ratchet freakratchet freak
5,5221 gold badge11 silver badges17 bronze badges
5,5221 gold badge11 silver badges17 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
To power the wired doorbell, there will be a transformer that converts the house voltage to a lower voltage. To decomission the wiring you'll have to find that transformer and remove it.
The other option would be to cap them off and leave them inside the box of the new doorbell. That lets you or a future homeowner use them in the future.
add a comment
|
To power the wired doorbell, there will be a transformer that converts the house voltage to a lower voltage. To decomission the wiring you'll have to find that transformer and remove it.
The other option would be to cap them off and leave them inside the box of the new doorbell. That lets you or a future homeowner use them in the future.
add a comment
|
To power the wired doorbell, there will be a transformer that converts the house voltage to a lower voltage. To decomission the wiring you'll have to find that transformer and remove it.
The other option would be to cap them off and leave them inside the box of the new doorbell. That lets you or a future homeowner use them in the future.
To power the wired doorbell, there will be a transformer that converts the house voltage to a lower voltage. To decomission the wiring you'll have to find that transformer and remove it.
The other option would be to cap them off and leave them inside the box of the new doorbell. That lets you or a future homeowner use them in the future.
answered Sep 17 at 20:33
beswaldbeswald
3115 bronze badges
3115 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174607%2fwired-to-wireless-doorbell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown