Adding Apache to User GroupUser permissions on upload directorywwwdata user not working when permissions are 400-500 - 403 forbidden accessApache permissions issueUnderstanding Group PermissionsUser access to FTP and at same time set www-data as owner/groupWordpress: Unpacking the package… Could not create directoryApache - Allow access to user home directories
I shift the source code, you shift the input!
I keep rewriting the same section of my story. How do I move forward?
What are the downsides of being a debt-free country (no foreign national debt)?
To find number of real roots
What does it mean to play in a mode?
Finding the time domain equation corresponding to a given DFT
Can the President be impeached twice?
Secure Implementation of Password Database
Why is Trump not being impeached for bribery?
Will the same Javascript fetched by HTTP and HTTPS be cached separately by the browser?
Does the basis graph of a matroid determine it?
Is it Possible to Catch an Unknown Exception?
Is it possible for a tiger's tail to be taken off and replaced with a living cobra, with both creatures still alive?
Did all integrated Commodore PET monitors always use 60 Hz refresh?
Countable and uncountable number
How did 達 (~tachi) come to mean `pluralize` something?
How do I force `sudo` to ask for a password each time when a specific command is used?
Why is 1>a.txt 2>&1 different from 1>a.txt 2>a.txt ? (Example shown)
Why is there a preference to use the cumulative distribution function to characterise a random variable instead of the probability density function?
Why didn't the British consider the USS President's attempted flight as a fake surrender?
How to answer my 5 year old why I can tell her what she has to do, and why she can't tell me what to do
Unexpected large rent payments, by moneygram, for my apartment, not by me
Can I ignore an open source license if I checkout a version that was released prior to the code having any license?
Can we use a Cryptographic hash function to generate infinite random numbers?
Adding Apache to User Group
User permissions on upload directorywwwdata user not working when permissions are 400-500 - 403 forbidden accessApache permissions issueUnderstanding Group PermissionsUser access to FTP and at same time set www-data as owner/groupWordpress: Unpacking the package… Could not create directoryApache - Allow access to user home directories
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
We have a small LAMP server running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS which contains a few sites. Access to the vhosts directories is set to root:AndSpecialSFTPGroup
. This works fine in general. However, some of the sites run on a CMS which need write access to particular folders. This is now not working, because the Apache user is www-data
.
Simple question: Is OK to add the www-data
to the AndSpecialSFTPGroup
group in order to grant it rwx
permissions. Or is this the wrong approach altogether.
Or should the owner of the website folders be www-data
?
12.04 permissions apache2
add a comment
|
We have a small LAMP server running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS which contains a few sites. Access to the vhosts directories is set to root:AndSpecialSFTPGroup
. This works fine in general. However, some of the sites run on a CMS which need write access to particular folders. This is now not working, because the Apache user is www-data
.
Simple question: Is OK to add the www-data
to the AndSpecialSFTPGroup
group in order to grant it rwx
permissions. Or is this the wrong approach altogether.
Or should the owner of the website folders be www-data
?
12.04 permissions apache2
add a comment
|
We have a small LAMP server running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS which contains a few sites. Access to the vhosts directories is set to root:AndSpecialSFTPGroup
. This works fine in general. However, some of the sites run on a CMS which need write access to particular folders. This is now not working, because the Apache user is www-data
.
Simple question: Is OK to add the www-data
to the AndSpecialSFTPGroup
group in order to grant it rwx
permissions. Or is this the wrong approach altogether.
Or should the owner of the website folders be www-data
?
12.04 permissions apache2
We have a small LAMP server running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS which contains a few sites. Access to the vhosts directories is set to root:AndSpecialSFTPGroup
. This works fine in general. However, some of the sites run on a CMS which need write access to particular folders. This is now not working, because the Apache user is www-data
.
Simple question: Is OK to add the www-data
to the AndSpecialSFTPGroup
group in order to grant it rwx
permissions. Or is this the wrong approach altogether.
Or should the owner of the website folders be www-data
?
12.04 permissions apache2
12.04 permissions apache2
edited Sep 30 at 16:55
Eliah Kagan
96.8k25 gold badges262 silver badges453 bronze badges
96.8k25 gold badges262 silver badges453 bronze badges
asked Nov 6 '12 at 5:25
Adrian WagnerAdrian Wagner
531 gold badge1 silver badge3 bronze badges
531 gold badge1 silver badge3 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There are a few ways you could approach this, but you can add www-data
to that group like so:
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
As far as "Is it the right way to do this?" Like I said, there are many ways to accomplish this, but it's similar to asking me what's the best way to arrange your desk. In many facets of IT, development, and OS, there are choices left up to preference.
This is the way I prefer to handle permissions like this because if I screw something up, I can easily remove the user from the group again. You might like using chown
to give all the files to www-data
, or something else altogether.
My way is a right way to do this, which is why I most likely won't get flagged for being subjective, but there are other ways. (Like I mentioned chown
, create another user, chmod
to change the permissions overall, etc...)
Thanks, Kyle. What I am mostly 'wondering' about, is if this is an appropriate approach....
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 6 '12 at 7:28
It is @AdrianWagner
– Rinzwind
Nov 6 '12 at 7:35
@AdrianWagner See my updated answer
– Kyle Macey
Nov 6 '12 at 14:34
Thanks again, Kyle. That was the answer I needed. I knew I could solve it this way, but was wondering if there were be no-no's attached to it.
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 7 '12 at 2:55
useradd
(likeusermod
) is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:32
|
show 1 more comment
This is an old post, but I got to it via Google as the top result for "ubunut add apache to a group".
Since the www-data user already exists the command should be usermod, which is used to modify an existing user.
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
You can then confirm the change by executing
id www-data
usermod
is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:29
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f213489%2fadding-apache-to-user-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are a few ways you could approach this, but you can add www-data
to that group like so:
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
As far as "Is it the right way to do this?" Like I said, there are many ways to accomplish this, but it's similar to asking me what's the best way to arrange your desk. In many facets of IT, development, and OS, there are choices left up to preference.
This is the way I prefer to handle permissions like this because if I screw something up, I can easily remove the user from the group again. You might like using chown
to give all the files to www-data
, or something else altogether.
My way is a right way to do this, which is why I most likely won't get flagged for being subjective, but there are other ways. (Like I mentioned chown
, create another user, chmod
to change the permissions overall, etc...)
Thanks, Kyle. What I am mostly 'wondering' about, is if this is an appropriate approach....
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 6 '12 at 7:28
It is @AdrianWagner
– Rinzwind
Nov 6 '12 at 7:35
@AdrianWagner See my updated answer
– Kyle Macey
Nov 6 '12 at 14:34
Thanks again, Kyle. That was the answer I needed. I knew I could solve it this way, but was wondering if there were be no-no's attached to it.
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 7 '12 at 2:55
useradd
(likeusermod
) is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:32
|
show 1 more comment
There are a few ways you could approach this, but you can add www-data
to that group like so:
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
As far as "Is it the right way to do this?" Like I said, there are many ways to accomplish this, but it's similar to asking me what's the best way to arrange your desk. In many facets of IT, development, and OS, there are choices left up to preference.
This is the way I prefer to handle permissions like this because if I screw something up, I can easily remove the user from the group again. You might like using chown
to give all the files to www-data
, or something else altogether.
My way is a right way to do this, which is why I most likely won't get flagged for being subjective, but there are other ways. (Like I mentioned chown
, create another user, chmod
to change the permissions overall, etc...)
Thanks, Kyle. What I am mostly 'wondering' about, is if this is an appropriate approach....
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 6 '12 at 7:28
It is @AdrianWagner
– Rinzwind
Nov 6 '12 at 7:35
@AdrianWagner See my updated answer
– Kyle Macey
Nov 6 '12 at 14:34
Thanks again, Kyle. That was the answer I needed. I knew I could solve it this way, but was wondering if there were be no-no's attached to it.
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 7 '12 at 2:55
useradd
(likeusermod
) is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:32
|
show 1 more comment
There are a few ways you could approach this, but you can add www-data
to that group like so:
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
As far as "Is it the right way to do this?" Like I said, there are many ways to accomplish this, but it's similar to asking me what's the best way to arrange your desk. In many facets of IT, development, and OS, there are choices left up to preference.
This is the way I prefer to handle permissions like this because if I screw something up, I can easily remove the user from the group again. You might like using chown
to give all the files to www-data
, or something else altogether.
My way is a right way to do this, which is why I most likely won't get flagged for being subjective, but there are other ways. (Like I mentioned chown
, create another user, chmod
to change the permissions overall, etc...)
There are a few ways you could approach this, but you can add www-data
to that group like so:
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
As far as "Is it the right way to do this?" Like I said, there are many ways to accomplish this, but it's similar to asking me what's the best way to arrange your desk. In many facets of IT, development, and OS, there are choices left up to preference.
This is the way I prefer to handle permissions like this because if I screw something up, I can easily remove the user from the group again. You might like using chown
to give all the files to www-data
, or something else altogether.
My way is a right way to do this, which is why I most likely won't get flagged for being subjective, but there are other ways. (Like I mentioned chown
, create another user, chmod
to change the permissions overall, etc...)
edited Oct 26 '13 at 16:28
answered Nov 6 '12 at 5:33
Kyle MaceyKyle Macey
1,65916 silver badges25 bronze badges
1,65916 silver badges25 bronze badges
Thanks, Kyle. What I am mostly 'wondering' about, is if this is an appropriate approach....
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 6 '12 at 7:28
It is @AdrianWagner
– Rinzwind
Nov 6 '12 at 7:35
@AdrianWagner See my updated answer
– Kyle Macey
Nov 6 '12 at 14:34
Thanks again, Kyle. That was the answer I needed. I knew I could solve it this way, but was wondering if there were be no-no's attached to it.
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 7 '12 at 2:55
useradd
(likeusermod
) is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:32
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks, Kyle. What I am mostly 'wondering' about, is if this is an appropriate approach....
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 6 '12 at 7:28
It is @AdrianWagner
– Rinzwind
Nov 6 '12 at 7:35
@AdrianWagner See my updated answer
– Kyle Macey
Nov 6 '12 at 14:34
Thanks again, Kyle. That was the answer I needed. I knew I could solve it this way, but was wondering if there were be no-no's attached to it.
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 7 '12 at 2:55
useradd
(likeusermod
) is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:32
Thanks, Kyle. What I am mostly 'wondering' about, is if this is an appropriate approach....
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 6 '12 at 7:28
Thanks, Kyle. What I am mostly 'wondering' about, is if this is an appropriate approach....
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 6 '12 at 7:28
It is @AdrianWagner
– Rinzwind
Nov 6 '12 at 7:35
It is @AdrianWagner
– Rinzwind
Nov 6 '12 at 7:35
@AdrianWagner See my updated answer
– Kyle Macey
Nov 6 '12 at 14:34
@AdrianWagner See my updated answer
– Kyle Macey
Nov 6 '12 at 14:34
Thanks again, Kyle. That was the answer I needed. I knew I could solve it this way, but was wondering if there were be no-no's attached to it.
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 7 '12 at 2:55
Thanks again, Kyle. That was the answer I needed. I knew I could solve it this way, but was wondering if there were be no-no's attached to it.
– Adrian Wagner
Nov 7 '12 at 2:55
useradd
(like usermod
) is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use -G
and not -g
.– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:32
useradd
(like usermod
) is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use -G
and not -g
.– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:32
|
show 1 more comment
This is an old post, but I got to it via Google as the top result for "ubunut add apache to a group".
Since the www-data user already exists the command should be usermod, which is used to modify an existing user.
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
You can then confirm the change by executing
id www-data
usermod
is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:29
add a comment
|
This is an old post, but I got to it via Google as the top result for "ubunut add apache to a group".
Since the www-data user already exists the command should be usermod, which is used to modify an existing user.
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
You can then confirm the change by executing
id www-data
usermod
is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:29
add a comment
|
This is an old post, but I got to it via Google as the top result for "ubunut add apache to a group".
Since the www-data user already exists the command should be usermod, which is used to modify an existing user.
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
You can then confirm the change by executing
id www-data
This is an old post, but I got to it via Google as the top result for "ubunut add apache to a group".
Since the www-data user already exists the command should be usermod, which is used to modify an existing user.
sudo usermod -a -G AndSpecialSFTPGroup www-data
You can then confirm the change by executing
id www-data
answered Oct 26 '13 at 6:33
thetitanthetitan
212 bronze badges
212 bronze badges
usermod
is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:29
add a comment
|
usermod
is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use-G
and not-g
.
– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:29
usermod
is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use -G
and not -g
.– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:29
usermod
is always a bit dangerous -- be careful to use -G
and not -g
.– guntbert
Oct 26 '13 at 11:29
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f213489%2fadding-apache-to-user-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown