Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?Does the offhand attack from Crossbow Expert get a Dex bonus?Does the double-bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?What function does the “light” weapon property serve on the hand crossbow?How do you load a hand crossbow?Extra Attack, Crossbow Expert, and hand crossbow: 4 shots per turn?Do monks add their ability modifier to their additional attacks?Crossbow Expert + Mobile FeatDoes Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?Does Crossbow Expert let me fire a hand crossbow as a bonus action after using a one-handed weapon's versatile property?Can you attack multiple times a turn with a light/heavy crossbow and the Crossbow Expert feat?Can you attack with a two-handed weapon, drop it, and then use Crossbow Expert's bonus action via an Extra Attack with a hand crossbow?

Would the professor leave the classroom if only 1 student uses their cellphone during class?

How to inflict ESD-damage on a board?

What elements would be created in a star composed entirely of gold?

Letters associated with prime numbers

instead of pressurizing an entire spacesuit with oxygen could oxygen just pressurize the head and the rest of the body be pressurized with water?

How does kinetic energy work in braking a vehicle?

What does exhaust smell on oil and transmission dipstick mean?

Can I take the high-speed bullet train Beijing–Hong Kong under Chinese 144 h visa-free transit rules?

What term can we propose for someone who prioritizes equipment over musicianship?

How could a sequence of random dates be generated, given year interval?

What does “studies need to be taken with more than the usual grain of salt” mean?

SAME DIGIT NUMBER PUZZLE

How can an immortal member of the nobility be prevented from taking the throne?

Can one attune multiple items at the same time?

Why would an elected (absentionist) Sinn Féin MP resign from the House of Commons?

Artificially isolated pawn in the Caro-Kann

Why do some web servers still provide information on vendor and version in the HTTP response headers

Plain Hunt Bell-Ringing

Antonym for “boilerplate” or “cookie-cutter”

where does black come from in CMYK color mode?

What type of key profile is this?

Dynamic SOQL in Map with unknow sobject?

How can I filter an EntityClass by _not_ having a property?

What is this second smaller runway next to London City Airport?



Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?


Does the offhand attack from Crossbow Expert get a Dex bonus?Does the double-bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?What function does the “light” weapon property serve on the hand crossbow?How do you load a hand crossbow?Extra Attack, Crossbow Expert, and hand crossbow: 4 shots per turn?Do monks add their ability modifier to their additional attacks?Crossbow Expert + Mobile FeatDoes Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?Does Crossbow Expert let me fire a hand crossbow as a bonus action after using a one-handed weapon's versatile property?Can you attack multiple times a turn with a light/heavy crossbow and the Crossbow Expert feat?Can you attack with a two-handed weapon, drop it, and then use Crossbow Expert's bonus action via an Extra Attack with a hand crossbow?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









14














$begingroup$


The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.










share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32

















14














$begingroup$


The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.










share|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32













14












14








14





$begingroup$


The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.










share|improve this question












$endgroup$




The Two-Weapon Fighting rule says:




When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
hand. You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus
attack, unless that modifier is negative.



If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon,
instead of making a melee attack with it.




With Two-Weapon Fighting, I can only add my ability modifier to the damage of the first attack. Even if I get the Dual Wielder feat (PHB, p. 165), it doesn't say anything about adding the ability score to the damage.



The Crossbow Expert feat (PHB, p. 165) says:




Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following
benefits:



  • You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.

  • Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage
    on your ranged attack rolls.

  • When you use the Attack action and attack with a one-handed weapon,
    you can use a bonus action to attack with a loaded hand crossbow you
    are holding.



When I attack using the bonus action granted by Crossbow Expert, do I add my ability modifier to the damage? I don't know whether I should follow the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, or roll damage as for a normal weapon attack.







dnd-5e feats damage attack






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 30 at 5:13









V2Blast

34.7k5 gold badges127 silver badges218 bronze badges




34.7k5 gold badges127 silver badges218 bronze badges










asked May 30 at 2:35









solen'yasolen'ya

736 bronze badges




736 bronze badges










  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
    $endgroup$
    – Oblivious Sage
    May 30 at 2:38






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:23










  • $begingroup$
    Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 30 at 5:24











  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
    $endgroup$
    – Tiggerous
    May 30 at 7:32







6




6




$begingroup$
Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
$endgroup$
– Oblivious Sage
May 30 at 2:38




$begingroup$
Welcome to the site! Please take the tour when you get the chance. It looks like you're asking about the 5th edition of D&D, can you confirm that for us?
$endgroup$
– Oblivious Sage
May 30 at 2:38




1




1




$begingroup$
Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:23




$begingroup$
Looks good now! I've made a few edits to add links and page numbers and clean things up. It should be reopened shortly. I'm surprised this question hasn't been asked before! I searched RPG.SE and found no questions that ask quite what this one does.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:23












$begingroup$
Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:24





$begingroup$
Related but not a duplicate (though the answer there might answer this one): Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 30 at 5:24













$begingroup$
Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
$endgroup$
– Tiggerous
May 30 at 7:32




$begingroup$
Also related: Does the double bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?
$endgroup$
– Tiggerous
May 30 at 7:32










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















18
















$begingroup$

You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



The general rule for damage rolls is:




When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




So far, so good.



But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    May 30 at 13:16


















10
















$begingroup$

Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$






















    1
















    $begingroup$

    The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



    So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
      $endgroup$
      – krb
      May 30 at 14:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      May 30 at 15:18











    • $begingroup$
      I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
      $endgroup$
      – krb
      May 30 at 15:32






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      May 30 at 15:33







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
      $endgroup$
      – V2Blast
      May 30 at 22:07













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148963%2fdo-i-add-my-ability-modifier-to-the-damage-of-the-bonus-action-attack-granted-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18
















    $begingroup$

    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16















    18
















    $begingroup$

    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16













    18














    18










    18







    $begingroup$

    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.






    share|improve this answer












    $endgroup$



    You can add your ability modifier to damage from the bonus action attack



    The general rule for damage rolls is:




    When attacking with a weapon, you add your ability modifier--the same modifier used for the attack roll--to the damage.




    In short: You can add your ability modifier to your crossbow attack because nothing tells you that you cannot.



    Unofficial guidance from Jeremy Crawford (5e's lead rules designer), which some may consider authoritative, agrees with this interpretation:




    When making a weapon attack, you add your ability modifier to the damage, unless a feature tells you not to.




    So far, so good.



    But, does this rule for two-weapon fighting, which also grants a bonus action, confuse matters?




    You don't add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.




    Dont worry - this rule can be safely ignored. The bonus action granted by the Crossbow Expert feat is not the same as the bonus action granted by two-weapon fighting. Thus the two-weapon fighting rules are completely irrelevant to your situation.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited May 30 at 10:59

























    answered May 30 at 7:06









    TiggerousTiggerous

    15.9k5 gold badges69 silver badges123 bronze badges




    15.9k5 gold badges69 silver badges123 bronze badges










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
      $endgroup$
      – Zibbobz
      May 30 at 13:16







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    May 30 at 13:16




    $begingroup$
    This also follows from the general rule philosophy of 5e - "There are no hidden rules". Two-Weapon Fighting and Crossbow Expert describe what they do in full - no 'hidden' rules about one would exist in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    May 30 at 13:16













    10
















    $begingroup$

    Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



    As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



    Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$



















      10
















      $begingroup$

      Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



      As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



      Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$

















        10














        10










        10







        $begingroup$

        Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



        As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



        Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.






        share|improve this answer










        $endgroup$



        Yes, because it's not Two-Weapon Fighting.



        As you correctly point out, the rules for using a hand crossbow with Crossbow Expert don't mention losing out on your stat bonus. Since using your off-hand crossbow in this way doesn't actually use the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, you don't need to refer to them at all when using Crossbow Expert.



        Since Crossbow Expert effectively gives you an entirely new way of spending your bonus action to attack, you get your full ability modifier to damage.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered May 30 at 7:02









        DuckTapeAlDuckTapeAl

        40.3k9 gold badges139 silver badges233 bronze badges




        40.3k9 gold badges139 silver badges233 bronze badges
























            1
















            $begingroup$

            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07
















            1
















            $begingroup$

            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07














            1














            1










            1







            $begingroup$

            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.






            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



            The other answers are correct but they fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons. The only way that the rules for dual weapon could apply to your hand crossbow would be if you swung the crossbow itself at somebody as an improvised club.



            So long as you are using the crossbow as a ranged weapon to fire crossbow bolts at enemies, the 2 weapon style rule does not apply and you only need to worry about the rules of the feat that allows you to fire it as a bonus action.







            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer










            answered May 30 at 14:03









            krbkrb

            3,3141 gold badge7 silver badges20 bronze badges




            3,3141 gold badge7 silver badges20 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07

















            • $begingroup$
              I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 14:55






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:18











            • $begingroup$
              I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
              $endgroup$
              – krb
              May 30 at 15:32






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              May 30 at 15:33







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              May 30 at 22:07
















            $begingroup$
            I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 14:55




            $begingroup$
            I normally don't care, but in this case I am curious why somebody downvoted this answer. Is this an actual disagreement with my interpretation of the rules?
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 14:55




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:18





            $begingroup$
            I didn't downvote, but I also didn't upvote because while you are very right, you didn't support it with the relevant rules citations. TIggerous kind of addresses it in their last sentence.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:18













            $begingroup$
            I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 15:32




            $begingroup$
            I see what you mean, but in this case the relevant rules are quoted in the actual question.
            $endgroup$
            – krb
            May 30 at 15:32




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:33





            $begingroup$
            DuckTapeAl also covers this,so I'm not sure that it's exlicitly not covered in their answer. But even then, I usually reference "as you've quoted" in answers that have the relevant quotes in the question (I didn't upvote Al's answer either because of this, too.) But you asked, and I answered. How you want to proceed is up to you :) - although i don't know why someone downvoted.
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            May 30 at 15:33





            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            May 30 at 22:07





            $begingroup$
            "The other answers [...] fail to explicitly state the factor that makes them correct: The rules for 2-weapon style do not apply in this case because they only apply to melee weapons." - The TWF rules are irrelevant not because of the weapon type that the feat lets you make a bonus-action attack with - but because the feat is what's letting you make that bonus-action attack, not TWF. Even if the feat let you make a bonus-action attack with a specific melee weapon (e.g. a spear), it still wouldn't relate to TWF, because the feat is what grants you the ability to make that attack, not TWF.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            May 30 at 22:07



















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148963%2fdo-i-add-my-ability-modifier-to-the-damage-of-the-bonus-action-attack-granted-by%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

            Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

            Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?